Connect with us

Missouri

Messenger: Are there still debtors’ prisons in Missouri? This case suggests yes.

Published

on

Messenger: Are there still debtors’ prisons in Missouri? This case suggests yes.


BENTON, Mo. — Carl Rose is in debtors’ prison.

It pretty much says so on the order that Scott County Associate Circuit Court Judge Julia Koester signed to send Rose to jail for at least seven days. It was for a civil contempt charge related to a business dispute lawsuit. Rose can’t get out of the Scott County Jail, Koester’s order says, unless he pays the court $10,500.

He doesn’t have it. He said so in a court document he filed himself to seek his release. His husband says Rose doesn’t have any money. His lawyers in another case say he doesn’t have any money.

He’s been in jail 11 days and counting.

Advertisement

“He’s exhausted all his resources and he’s going to let fate run its course,” says Rose’s husband, Drew Rodgers-Rose.






Advertisement

Carl Rose, left, and his husband, Drew Rodgers-Rose, pose for a photo with their daughter, Novie, and their dog, Maggie.




The couple has lived in Scott County, in southwest Missouri, for more than a dozen years. It’s where Rose grew up, where he used to be a police officer and a sheriff’s deputy.

People are also reading…

Advertisement

Rose was sent to jail because the judge found him in civil contempt amid a two-year-old legal battle with his former business partner, John Caudle.

The two men started a funeral home business together in 2020. Things went sour. Caudle accused Rose of improper financial transactions and using company money to buy a truck and an SUV. Caudle, who is represented by attorney Phil Dormeyer of Cape Girardeau, filed a lawsuit. Rose hired an attorney, later fired him and ended up representing himself.

Advertisement

Last year, as the case was about to go to trial, Rose was charged with 50 counts of criminal fraud, including 47 felonies, related to the dispute. After seven days in jail, he bonded out. He has been monitored by an ankle bracelet, which costs him $160 every two weeks. That case, based on the same underlying issues as the civil case, was moved to Butler County and is scheduled for a trial in October.

But the civil trial, with Rose representing himself, took place last summer. In a one-day trial — Rose skipped the afternoon part of it — Koester ruled against him. She also issued a civil judgment of more than $400,000 against him.

Caudle tried to collect, including seizing items from the Sikeston house where Rose and Rodgers-Rose live. That’s when St. Louis attorneys Hugh Eastwood and Chris Hoell got involved. When the sheriff showed up at the house with Caudle and Dormeyer to seize Rose’s assets, they started taking at least some things that were marital property.

“Basically, anything that wasn’t bolted down, they took,” Rodgers-Rose says.

That’s an unconstitutional taking of marital property, Eastwood and Hoell contend. They filed a federal civil rights lawsuit in February, naming former Scott County Sheriff Wes Drury, Dormeyer, Caudle and Scott County as defendants.

Advertisement


Tony Messenger | Post-Dispatch



The search was meant to “humiliate and harm” the homeowners, not to collect on the civil judgment, the lawsuit contends.

Advertisement

In the suit, Rose’s attorneys address the underlying small-town drama that is difficult to separate from the case. Rose used to be a sheriff’s deputy. Drury fired him after Rose announced a plan to run for sheriff against his boss. Drury won the race. Rose later ran and lost a race for coroner.

Last year, as Rose and Caudle were involved in their legal dispute over the failing business partnership, Caudle ran for and won the office of coroner.

The sheriff’s sale of the property that was seized from Rose and Rodgers-Rose netted only a couple thousand dollars. Then, Dormeyer filed a motion for contempt in the Scott County case because Rose hadn’t fulfilled elements of the civil judgment.

Earlier this month, the judge found Rose in contempt, in part because he didn’t follow her instructions to open an account at a specific bank to track deposits he would have to make.

Though it’s not clear in court records how she determined it, Koester found Rose was “willfully” refusing to comply with her order. That’s important, says Peter Joy, a Washington University law professor. Joy says a judge can only hold a person in jail over a failure to pay monetary damages if the judge believes they have the ability to pay.

Advertisement

“If the person doesn’t have the capacity to pay, then they can’t be put in jail,” Joy says.

Eastwood and Hoell say Rose doesn’t have any money. He’s unemployed. Caudle and Dormeyer already took whatever possessions they could, including Rose’s truck. He isn’t going to magically come up with the money to get out of jail, his husband says.

“It is shocking and outrageous that in a 2025, a judge is willing to indefinitely lock up a person until they pay a $10,000 ransom that they cannot afford simply at the request of an overzealous attorney,” Hoell says.

Because of ethics rules, Eastwood and Hoell can’t represent Rose in the civil lawsuit in Scott County to try to get him out of jail. That’s because they filed the federal lawsuit that also names Dormeyer, an attorney on the state case.

Attorneys for Caudle, Dormeyer and the other Scott County defendants have said in court documents that the search and seizure of Rose’s property was lawful. They have sought to get the federal lawsuit dismissed, arguing it is essentially a state matter already being handled by a different judge.

Advertisement

“Plaintiffs’ repeated casting of Mr. Rose as a victim of ‘political lawfare’ is a transparently disingenuous framing of the underlying civil and criminal cases against him,” Dormeyer alleges in a filing.

To date, Rose hasn’t been convicted of a criminal offense. But he sits in jail, with an ankle monitor attached, as a judge tries to help the elected county coroner collect a business debt. The folks at the jail, under the supervision of a new sheriff, have been nice, Rodgers-Rose says. They don’t seem to understand why Rose is there, he says.

“How long is Carl supposed to sit behind bars before the judge decides enough is enough and releases the man whose only crime is not having $10,000 laying around?” Hoell asks.


Messenger: A post-tornado plea from north St. Louis: ‘We don’t want to feel alone.’

Advertisement


Messenger: A siren is blaring in storm-weary America. Is Trump administration listening?


Messenger: SLU law school grad is ready to fight for the ‘defenseless and oppressed’


Messenger: Want to get charges dropped in St. Louis? Promise not to sue.

Advertisement



Source link

Missouri

Missouri Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 winning numbers for March 25, 2026

Published

on


The Missouri Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at March 25, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from March 25 drawing

07-21-55-56-64, Powerball: 26, Power Play: 4

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Pick 3 numbers from March 25 drawing

Midday: 3-2-0

Midday Wild: 7

Evening: 0-0-5

Evening Wild: 5

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Pick 4 numbers from March 25 drawing

Midday: 2-6-3-9

Midday Wild: 4

Evening: 9-5-6-8

Evening Wild: 1

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Cash Pop numbers from March 25 drawing

Early Bird: 07

Morning: 09

Matinee: 04

Prime Time: 14

Night Owl: 07

Advertisement

Check Cash Pop payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Show Me Cash numbers from March 25 drawing

12-14-22-26-28

Check Show Me Cash payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Powerball Double Play numbers from March 25 drawing

35-38-41-43-62, Powerball: 08

Check Powerball Double Play payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

All Missouri Lottery retailers can redeem prizes up to $600. For prizes over $600, winners have the option to submit their claim by mail or in person at one of Missouri Lottery’s regional offices, by appointment only.

To claim by mail, complete a Missouri Lottery winner claim form, sign your winning ticket, and include a copy of your government-issued photo ID along with a completed IRS Form W-9. Ensure your name, address, telephone number and signature are on the back of your ticket. Claims should be mailed to:

Ticket Redemption

Missouri Lottery

Advertisement

P.O. Box 7777

Jefferson City, MO 65102-7777

For in-person claims, visit the Missouri Lottery Headquarters in Jefferson City or one of the regional offices in Kansas City, Springfield or St. Louis. Be sure to call ahead to verify hours and check if an appointment is required.

For additional instructions or to download the claim form, visit the Missouri Lottery prize claim page.

When are the Missouri Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 9:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 10 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Pick 3: 12:45 p.m. (Midday) and 8:59 p.m. (Evening) daily.
  • Pick 4: 12:45 p.m. (Midday) and 8:59 p.m. (Evening) daily.
  • Cash4Life: 8 p.m. daily.
  • Cash Pop: 8 a.m. (Early Bird), 11 a.m. (Late Morning), 3 p.m. (Matinee), 7 p.m. (Prime Time) and 11 p.m. (Night Owl) daily.
  • Show Me Cash: 8:59 p.m. daily.
  • Lotto: 8:59 p.m. Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Powerball Double Play: 9:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Missouri editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri AG orders 13 unlicensed Kansas City dispensaries to stop selling products

Published

on

Missouri AG orders 13 unlicensed Kansas City dispensaries to stop selling products


KANSAS CITY, Mo. (KCTV) – Dozens of dispensaries have been ordered to close after Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway said they are selling without licenses.

The AG’s office sent cease-and-desist letters to 33 dispensaries. Of those, 13 are in the Kansas City area, according to information provided by the state.

Each location is accused of selling cannabis or marijuana products without a state license, or selling other products deceptively marketed as marijuana, according to Hanaway.

Hanaway’s office also said testing found some products contained things such as lead, arsenic, and ethanol. They also used deceptive labeling and packaging, including designs that may target children, according to a news release.

Advertisement

Here are the locations named by the AG’s office:

  • Big Chiefs Kush Waldo (Kansas City)
  • Dr. Smoke (Kansas City)
  • It’s A Dream (Kansas City)
  • KC Kush (Kansas City)
  • Main Smoke Shop KC (Kansas City)
  • Mr. Niceguy (Kansas City)
  • Prohibition Cannabis (Kansas City)
  • Center Smoke Shop (Independence)
  • Gray Area Cannabis (Independence)
  • Herb Depot (Independence)
  • Sacred Leaf (Independence)
  • Super E Cig Smoke Shop (St. Joseph)
  • Vapor Maven (Cameron)

The letters demand each of the above the businesses stop selling the products in question.

The full letter sent to the businesses is below.

Copyright 2026 KCTV. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri Senate committee hears bill on private school bathroom policies for transgender students

Published

on

Missouri Senate committee hears bill on private school bathroom policies for transgender students


SPRINGFIELD, Mo. (KY3) – Missouri lawmakers are once again debating restrictions involving transgender students.

A Missouri Senate committee heard testimony on a bill that would allow private schools to enforce bathroom and locker room policies based on gender assigned at birth on Tuesday morning. Senate Bill 1558 would prevent cities, counties, or other local municipalities from adopting ordinances that would force a private school to change its bathroom policy, and defend private schools from lawsuits about bathroom use with state funds.

The bill was introduced following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year that students can use the bathroom that matches their preferred gender. Republican lawmakers want to keep that ruling from applying to private schools in Missouri.

Senate Education Chairman, Republican Sen. Rick Brattin, defended the legislation during the committee hearing.

Advertisement

“I think this is common sense, and it’s unfortunate we have to actually pass legislation like this,” Brattin said. “Now all of a sudden it’s like, we’ve created this social contagion that no one knows what sex they are or that it’s a ‘construct’, but society for all of human history has been male and female.”

Guillermo Villa-Trueba, PhD, a lobbyist for the Missouri Catholic Conference, testified in support of the bill on behalf of religious private schools.

“It’s very helpful for Catholic schools and private religious schools in general so we can enact policies that align with our religious beliefs and with biology,” Villa-Trueba said.

Democratic State Sen. Maggie Nurrenbern said the legislature spends too much time on bathroom-related legislation.

“Here in the education committee, we have spent a tremendous amount of time talking about these issues,” Nurrenbern said. “And I can say in the last six years working in the education committees, both in the House and Senate, I am tired of talking about bathrooms, and I wish we could spend a heck of a lot more time talking about classrooms.”

Advertisement

Samantha Jones, a Missourian who testified against the bill, said the measure is based on incorrect assumptions. Jones drew on her own experiences as an intersex person.

“It is an incorrect assumption that gender is rigidly binary and that sex is as well,” Jones said. “Attacking the transgender and nonbinary and intersex community is an unnecessary waste of time, tax dollars and other state resources.”

The bill is one of 52 measures dealing with transgender issues being considered by Missouri lawmakers. Missouri currently has no statewide regulations on which bathrooms transgender people can use in public. Twenty-one other states, including Kansas, have some kind of regulation in place.

To report a correction or typo, please email digitalnews@ky3.com. Please include the article info in the subject line of the email.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending