Connect with us

Missouri

Messenger: Are there still debtors’ prisons in Missouri? This case suggests yes.

Published

on

Messenger: Are there still debtors’ prisons in Missouri? This case suggests yes.


BENTON, Mo. — Carl Rose is in debtors’ prison.

It pretty much says so on the order that Scott County Associate Circuit Court Judge Julia Koester signed to send Rose to jail for at least seven days. It was for a civil contempt charge related to a business dispute lawsuit. Rose can’t get out of the Scott County Jail, Koester’s order says, unless he pays the court $10,500.

He doesn’t have it. He said so in a court document he filed himself to seek his release. His husband says Rose doesn’t have any money. His lawyers in another case say he doesn’t have any money.

He’s been in jail 11 days and counting.

Advertisement

“He’s exhausted all his resources and he’s going to let fate run its course,” says Rose’s husband, Drew Rodgers-Rose.






Advertisement

Carl Rose, left, and his husband, Drew Rodgers-Rose, pose for a photo with their daughter, Novie, and their dog, Maggie.




The couple has lived in Scott County, in southwest Missouri, for more than a dozen years. It’s where Rose grew up, where he used to be a police officer and a sheriff’s deputy.

People are also reading…

Advertisement

Rose was sent to jail because the judge found him in civil contempt amid a two-year-old legal battle with his former business partner, John Caudle.

The two men started a funeral home business together in 2020. Things went sour. Caudle accused Rose of improper financial transactions and using company money to buy a truck and an SUV. Caudle, who is represented by attorney Phil Dormeyer of Cape Girardeau, filed a lawsuit. Rose hired an attorney, later fired him and ended up representing himself.

Advertisement

Last year, as the case was about to go to trial, Rose was charged with 50 counts of criminal fraud, including 47 felonies, related to the dispute. After seven days in jail, he bonded out. He has been monitored by an ankle bracelet, which costs him $160 every two weeks. That case, based on the same underlying issues as the civil case, was moved to Butler County and is scheduled for a trial in October.

But the civil trial, with Rose representing himself, took place last summer. In a one-day trial — Rose skipped the afternoon part of it — Koester ruled against him. She also issued a civil judgment of more than $400,000 against him.

Caudle tried to collect, including seizing items from the Sikeston house where Rose and Rodgers-Rose live. That’s when St. Louis attorneys Hugh Eastwood and Chris Hoell got involved. When the sheriff showed up at the house with Caudle and Dormeyer to seize Rose’s assets, they started taking at least some things that were marital property.

“Basically, anything that wasn’t bolted down, they took,” Rodgers-Rose says.

That’s an unconstitutional taking of marital property, Eastwood and Hoell contend. They filed a federal civil rights lawsuit in February, naming former Scott County Sheriff Wes Drury, Dormeyer, Caudle and Scott County as defendants.

Advertisement


Tony Messenger | Post-Dispatch



The search was meant to “humiliate and harm” the homeowners, not to collect on the civil judgment, the lawsuit contends.

Advertisement

In the suit, Rose’s attorneys address the underlying small-town drama that is difficult to separate from the case. Rose used to be a sheriff’s deputy. Drury fired him after Rose announced a plan to run for sheriff against his boss. Drury won the race. Rose later ran and lost a race for coroner.

Last year, as Rose and Caudle were involved in their legal dispute over the failing business partnership, Caudle ran for and won the office of coroner.

The sheriff’s sale of the property that was seized from Rose and Rodgers-Rose netted only a couple thousand dollars. Then, Dormeyer filed a motion for contempt in the Scott County case because Rose hadn’t fulfilled elements of the civil judgment.

Earlier this month, the judge found Rose in contempt, in part because he didn’t follow her instructions to open an account at a specific bank to track deposits he would have to make.

Though it’s not clear in court records how she determined it, Koester found Rose was “willfully” refusing to comply with her order. That’s important, says Peter Joy, a Washington University law professor. Joy says a judge can only hold a person in jail over a failure to pay monetary damages if the judge believes they have the ability to pay.

Advertisement

“If the person doesn’t have the capacity to pay, then they can’t be put in jail,” Joy says.

Eastwood and Hoell say Rose doesn’t have any money. He’s unemployed. Caudle and Dormeyer already took whatever possessions they could, including Rose’s truck. He isn’t going to magically come up with the money to get out of jail, his husband says.

“It is shocking and outrageous that in a 2025, a judge is willing to indefinitely lock up a person until they pay a $10,000 ransom that they cannot afford simply at the request of an overzealous attorney,” Hoell says.

Because of ethics rules, Eastwood and Hoell can’t represent Rose in the civil lawsuit in Scott County to try to get him out of jail. That’s because they filed the federal lawsuit that also names Dormeyer, an attorney on the state case.

Attorneys for Caudle, Dormeyer and the other Scott County defendants have said in court documents that the search and seizure of Rose’s property was lawful. They have sought to get the federal lawsuit dismissed, arguing it is essentially a state matter already being handled by a different judge.

Advertisement

“Plaintiffs’ repeated casting of Mr. Rose as a victim of ‘political lawfare’ is a transparently disingenuous framing of the underlying civil and criminal cases against him,” Dormeyer alleges in a filing.

To date, Rose hasn’t been convicted of a criminal offense. But he sits in jail, with an ankle monitor attached, as a judge tries to help the elected county coroner collect a business debt. The folks at the jail, under the supervision of a new sheriff, have been nice, Rodgers-Rose says. They don’t seem to understand why Rose is there, he says.

“How long is Carl supposed to sit behind bars before the judge decides enough is enough and releases the man whose only crime is not having $10,000 laying around?” Hoell asks.


Messenger: A post-tornado plea from north St. Louis: ‘We don’t want to feel alone.’

Advertisement


Messenger: A siren is blaring in storm-weary America. Is Trump administration listening?


Messenger: SLU law school grad is ready to fight for the ‘defenseless and oppressed’


Messenger: Want to get charges dropped in St. Louis? Promise not to sue.

Advertisement



Source link

Missouri

See how much new unemployment claims in Missouri fell last week

Published

on

See how much new unemployment claims in Missouri fell last week


Initial filings for unemployment benefits in Missouri dropped last week compared with the week prior, the U.S. Department of Labor said Thursday.

New jobless claims, a proxy for layoffs, fell to 2,182 in the week ending February 21, down from 2,462 the week before, the Labor Department said.

U.S. unemployment claims rose to 212,000 last week, up 4,000 claims from 208,000 the week prior on a seasonally adjusted basis.

Advertisement

Rhode Island saw the largest percentage increase in weekly claims, with claims jumping by 132.0%. Michigan, meanwhile, saw the largest percentage drop in new claims, with claims dropping by 49.9%.

USA TODAY Co. is publishing localized versions of this story on its news sites across the country, generated with data from the U.S. Department of Labor’s weekly unemployment insurance claims report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri Lottery Pick 3, Pick 4 winning numbers for Feb. 26, 2026

Published

on


The Missouri Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at Feb. 26, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Pick 3 numbers from Feb. 26 drawing

Midday: 9-4-0

Midday Wild: 0

Advertisement

Evening: 5-3-9

Evening Wild: 1

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from Feb. 26 drawing

Midday: 9-7-1-7

Midday Wild: 5

Advertisement

Evening: 4-8-6-3

Evening Wild: 8

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Cash Pop numbers from Feb. 26 drawing

Early Bird: 10

Morning: 10

Advertisement

Matinee: 14

Prime Time: 10

Night Owl: 12

Check Cash Pop payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Show Me Cash numbers from Feb. 26 drawing

05-20-24-28-33

Advertisement

Check Show Me Cash payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

All Missouri Lottery retailers can redeem prizes up to $600. For prizes over $600, winners have the option to submit their claim by mail or in person at one of Missouri Lottery’s regional offices, by appointment only.

To claim by mail, complete a Missouri Lottery winner claim form, sign your winning ticket, and include a copy of your government-issued photo ID along with a completed IRS Form W-9. Ensure your name, address, telephone number and signature are on the back of your ticket. Claims should be mailed to:

Ticket Redemption

Advertisement

Missouri Lottery

P.O. Box 7777

Jefferson City, MO 65102-7777

For in-person claims, visit the Missouri Lottery Headquarters in Jefferson City or one of the regional offices in Kansas City, Springfield or St. Louis. Be sure to call ahead to verify hours and check if an appointment is required.

For additional instructions or to download the claim form, visit the Missouri Lottery prize claim page.

Advertisement

When are the Missouri Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 9:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 10 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Pick 3: 12:45 p.m. (Midday) and 8:59 p.m. (Evening) daily.
  • Pick 4: 12:45 p.m. (Midday) and 8:59 p.m. (Evening) daily.
  • Cash4Life: 8 p.m. daily.
  • Cash Pop: 8 a.m. (Early Bird), 11 a.m. (Late Morning), 3 p.m. (Matinee), 7 p.m. (Prime Time) and 11 p.m. (Night Owl) daily.
  • Show Me Cash: 8:59 p.m. daily.
  • Lotto: 8:59 p.m. Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Powerball Double Play: 9:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Missouri editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri lawmakers propose water and power usage requirements for data centers

Published

on

Missouri lawmakers propose water and power usage requirements for data centers


Data centers in Missouri would have to follow a set of requirements on electricity and water usage under legislation recently introduced in the House.

“It’s going to work on keeping our utility rates stable so that our folks throughout Missouri, not just St. Charles, but throughout Missouri, are not subject to price jolts and shocks,” said Rep. Colin Wellenkamp, R-St. Charles.

Wellenkamp and another St. Charles County Republican, Rep. Mike Costlow of Dardenne Prairie, have filed legislation titled the AI Infrastructure, Grid Integrity and Water Resource Protection Act. They spoke to reporters about the bill on Wednesday.

The legislation focuses on both electricity and water regarding data centers and, according to the sponsors, extends off a utility bill passed last year in the legislature.

Advertisement

On the electric side, the legislation requires large-load consumers, like data centers, that come to Missouri to pay for the necessary costs to provide them with electricity, including grid infrastructure upgrades.

“We have to make sure that that cost is not passed on in any situation to consumers. We want to protect our residents first, before we start to look to reap the benefits of this kind of investment into our state,” Costlow said.

The water infrastructure section of the bill involves a permit requirement from the Department of Natural Resources for large water users.

“If your facility is going to use more than 2 million gallons of fresh water per day, which is a lot, or 80% of the available capacity of that locality, you have to seek a DNR permit to do that,” Wellenkamp said.

If water usage goes even further, Wellenkamp said the bill would require the building out of freshwater capacity for the locality so that “no one is left in an insecure water environment.”

Advertisement

“We want AI infrastructure. We want a data driven economy. We want that development in our city. We want it in our county. It has to be done right,” Wellenkamp said.

According to Wellenkamp, doing it right means not compromising resources.

Cities are grappling with how to proceed concerning the increase in data centers in Missouri.

Wellenkamp’s district includes part of the city of St. Charles, where a yearlong moratorium on data centers was enacted last year. The St. Charles Planning and Zoning Commission voted this month to delay a vote on a proposed ban on data center development.

In March, St. Louis’ Zoning Section will hear a data center proposal after months of debate over the project.

Advertisement

Ultimately, Costlow said his bill is not intended to be against data centers or AI.

“We have a lot of the strengths that data centers are looking for. We have a lot of water. We have some of the cheapest power in the United States. We have some of the best data connectivity on long haul, dark fiber of anywhere in the Midwest,” Costlow said. “This is a place that data centers can come with very little impact, as long as we put the right guardrails around them.”

The legislation in the House hasn’t been sent to a committee yet, meaning it still has a long path to passing both the House and Senate.

Wellenkamp hopes the legislation gets a hearing quickly.

“It has a lot of interest. It has a lot of movement. But I would say, more importantly, and this is the best arrow in the quiver, it has a lot of urgency,” Wellenkamp said.

Advertisement

The legislation is HB 3362 and HB 3364





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending