Connect with us

Missouri

LDS Church unloading even more Missouri land. What’s up in this former and future Zion?

Published

on

LDS Church unloading even more Missouri land. What’s up in this former and future Zion?


For the second time in less than a month, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has put a large chunk of prime real estate up for sale in Missouri, a state of great historical and, many members believe, future significance for the Utah-based faith.

The latest listing includes 533 acres of vacant land in a fast-growing Kansas City suburb, according to the listing agent, which describes it as a multibillion-dollar development spread across 18 individual tracts in Clay County.

The posting comes mere weeks after news spread of the church putting more than 1,800 acres up for grabs in Lee’s Summit, a city of 103,000 straddling Jackson and Cass counties. Municipal officials applauded that decision to sell the property, according to Kansas City’s WDAF-TV. saying the wildland will serve as a shot of adrenaline to the economy upon development.

The combined nearly 3,000 acres from the two listings represent a small fraction of the church’s real estate portfolio in Missouri, however, including in Lee’s Summit.

Advertisement

Even so, the news is likely to raise eyebrows among Latter-day Saint faithful who believe God will one day call on members to return to Jackson County in preparation for the Second Coming of Jesus.

Why sell and why now?

A spokesperson for Property Reserve, a principal real estate arm of the church, cited “market opportunities” and a “look to the long term” as the main drivers behind the latest listings.

“In selling land we own in the greater Kansas City area,” communications director Dale Bills said, “we are responding to both local government planning, as well as interest from developers in the market.”

He continued: “For example, we have worked closely with officials in Lee’s Summit since 2019 to ensure that development of Property Reserve land there proceeds in alignment with city plans for healthy community growth, including providing essential services such as utilities, school transportation and public safety.”

David Slater, executive director of the Clay County Economic Development Council, said he is “excited” to work with the church’s real estate officials in developing the parcels in the Kansas City area.

Advertisement

“The tracts of land at the intersection of Highway 152 and Interstate 435,” Slater wrote in an email, “can be a game changer for the entire metro [area].”

What the church owns in Missouri

(Image courtesy of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints) Church founder Joseph Smith envisioned a Zion emerging in Independence, Mo.

Property records reveal extensive Missouri landholdings by the church, much of it located near sites tied to the faith’s history.

A 2019 pre-pandemic snapshot showed nearly 22,571 acres owned in the Midwestern state by the church or its land management affiliates such as Property Reserve, Suburban Land Reserve and Farmland Reserve.

Almost 60% of that land falls within five western Missouri counties centered around Independence, Lee’s Summit and Liberty as well as in the state’s two largest cities, Kansas City and St. Louis, which is located in eastern Missouri.

Advertisement

That same data shows the church’s holdings statewide were worth about $69 million in total market value in 2019, though nearly $42 million was pegged to religious properties.

The records — drawn from a database obtained in 2020 and released two years later by the Truth & Transparency Foundation (formerly known as MormonLeaks) and published in The Salt Lake Tribune — detail a nearly 16,000-parcel collection of 1.7 million acres held by identified church firms.

Its biggest tracts in Missouri, perhaps not surprisingly, are in Jackson County on the Kansas border, with Independence as its county seat. The faith has more than 10,000 acres countywide, with 5,920 acres held in and around Independence’s city limits.

Second is the nearly 6,400 acres in Clay County, site of the city of Liberty and its jail, where church founder Joseph Smith was held at one point.

Records show nearly 20,000 acres of church land in Missouri is agricultural, with notably large contiguous parcels of farmland northwest of Independence along the Missouri River.

Advertisement

Missouri, a past and future Zion

(The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints) Partial reconstruction of the Liberty Jail in Missouri, where the faith’s founder, Joseph Smith, was held for more than four months. The church is selling more than 1,800 acres in nearby Lee’s Summit and another 500-plus acres in the Kansas City area.

For most Americans, Missouri represents the epitome of flyover country. Even its most recognizable feature, the iconic Gateway Arch, reveals a self-awareness that its role in the story of the United States has always been a supporting one — a launching pad for those seeking the glittering, gold-filled West.

Not so for Latter-day Saints. All around the world, believers recount the revelations and struggles their spiritual foremothers and forefathers experienced during their brief and fraught stay there in the 1830s. First in Jackson and later in Clay, Caldwell and Daviess counties, the fledgling faith tried and failed to gain a foothold, its ambitions of creating a Zion community constantly crashing against the distrust of wary locals.

The group eventually bowed out of the Show Me State — but not, they believed, for good. In an 1831 revelation still read by Latter-day Saints, God promised church founder Joseph Smith that one day the righteous would be instructed to gather once more in Jackson County and, in particular, Independence, where together they would weather the turbulent last days before Jesus’ return.

R. Jean Addams, an independent scholar who has published extensively on the role of Missouri in the Latter-day Saint tradition, said Jackson County “is sacrosanct” for members. True, top church leaders have largely abandoned the topic of a literal gathering in Missouri in their public addresses (former apostle Marion G. Romney may have been the last to do so explicitly in General Conference, which he did in 1966). Nevertheless, Addams said it very much remains “a tenet of the church … even if it’s not talked about.”

Advertisement

Visit Sunday services at any Latter-day Saint congregation in the area and the region’s outsized role in the faith becomes obvious, Addams said. Meeting attendance has swelled there through the years he has returned, with newcomers coming from as far as Tonga and Samoa.

“They want to be there,” he said, “when it’s all wrapped up.”

The church has temples in Kansas City and St. Louis, with plans for a third, in Springfield. But many members are awaiting that long-promised temple in Independence, where Joseph Smith dedicated a site to greet the returning Lord.

Editor’s note • This story is available to Salt Lake Tribune subscribers only. Thank you for supporting local journalism.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Missouri

Three Takeaways From Missouri’s Frustrating Loss to Memphis

Published

on

Three Takeaways From Missouri’s Frustrating Loss to Memphis


At halftime, the Missouri Tigers looked like they had the game out of reach.

The bench production was clicking on all levels, the Tigers were forcing turnovers out of its zone defense and were running in transition, seemingly developing the start of an identity for this newly molded-together team. That quickly fell apart in the second half as Memphis did the same thing to them, with Missouri not having any answers on either side of the floor.

When you lead by 10 points at halftime, it’s a reasonable claim to expect to win. It’s not as if Missouri walked out in the second half relaxed because they had a lead, but everything in the first half pointed to them running away with it. Memphis matched their intensity on defense and began to force turnovers and bad shot attempts while getting star guard PJ Haggerty into transition. The flipping of the game plan on Missouri eventually resulted in the loss.

That being said, here are three takeaways from Missouri’s game-one defeat.

Advertisement

The Tigers brought out a fascinating starting lineup, one that did not feature transfer guards Tony Perkins and Marques Warrick. The first player off the bench was Perkins, who did not necessarily give the Tigers the production head coach Dennis Gates would have liked.

In the first half, sophomore forward Trent Pierce looked amazing, seemingly out of nowhere. He hit two threes in his first-half showing and finished with ten points in the half and 13 overall as the team’s second-leading scorer. Forward Aidan Shaw also made his presence felt, finishing with nine first-half points, all of which were momentum-building scores. Pierce and Shaw were the two biggest surprises off the bench, giving the Tigers much-needed scoring.

Though Perkins did not start, he gave Missouri a quality 21 minutes, a number that could likely ramp up and turn into a starting role. His four assists were the most helpful, primarily playing the point guard role when he was on the floor. He grabbed one steal and a block as well on the defensive end of the court.

The Tigers’ two-three zone defense clearly gave the Tigers the most effective results on the defensive side of the ball. Even when Memphis was hitting threes in the second half, many came in scramble situations.

Starting the half, forcing Memphis to score from the perimeter wasn’t a bad idea. They shot only 4-for-14 in that period and could not manage to put points on the board to close the gap with Missouri. The attempts Memphis was getting at that time were not comfortable ones either, many of which were contested or coming from a bad pass.

Advertisement

For some odd reason, the Tigers backed out of its zone when Memphis went on its run midway through the second half. They were getting to the free-throw line easily and had Missouri in foul trouble within five minutes of the start of the second period.

One thing was made evident in the solid first half from Missouri: the zone defense worked. Everyone was flying around and forcing steals and deflections and it allowed the Tigers to get out and run in transition. Zone defenses aren’t always sustainable for a whole game and can slow down the pace, but if it works, it works.

It looked like Gates and the Tigers had its rotation figured out in the first half. They were getting out in transition with Pierce and Anthony Robinson II, a surprising but effective decision. Pierce scored 10 points in the first half, knocking down two triples, a take at the rim and a massive fast break dunk. Nobody expected Robinson to play the minutes he did and the explosiveness from Pierce, as well as the lack of production from transfer forward Mark Mitchell, but what the Tigers put on the floor in the first half clearly worked.

That will be the over-arching theme the Tigers take away from the loss, being the first-half success. Gates saw firsthand five-man units that worked well together on both sides of the ball, even if that meant people were not getting in the game at all.

Gates sacrificed the playing time of star guard Tamar Bates in the first half because Robinson and company were clicking in multiple ways. Pierce and Shaw, who excelled in the first half, saw the floor in the following period for only five minutes each. Gates attributed that to the need for ball-handlers on the floor, but the length, defense and surprising offensive production both provided would have also been of assistance.

Advertisement

It is still very early in the season, and Gates and the staff are trying to find what works the best. Last season, Gates was not afraid to completely empty his bench for answers. Some consistency in that department might aid in team success, but for right now, it’s evident he is still searching.

Everything Dennis Gates Said Following Missouri’s Loss to Memphis
Dennis Gates Explains Quiet Second Halves for Shaw, Pierce in Mizzou’s Debut
Familiar Struggles Creep Up in Mizzou’s Season-Opening Loss to Memphis



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Memphis comes back to take down Missouri 83-75

Published

on

Memphis comes back to take down Missouri 83-75


The season seemed to be starting on the right foot for the Missouri Tigers.

The team was diving for loose balls, Aidan Shaw and Trent Pierce had clearly taken steps forward in the offensive games, the Tigers were off and running turning steals into alley-oops much more reminiscent of the 2022-23 season than last year.

Then the second half came and a very familiar feeling fell over the game.

Missouri led by as many as 14 points, but Memphis was able to charge back for an 83-75 season-opening win Monday in Memphis.

Advertisement

“In that first half, I don’t think we executed on the turnovers and the mistakes like I thought we should,” Missouri coach Dennis Gates said. “The second half, they did a tremendous job of getting to the paint and getting to the free-throw line. Being able to shoot that many free throws to obviously begin that half and our inability to keep them out the lane. Those two categories were the categories that allowed them to get 51 total points in the second half.”

After not starting, Iowa transfer Tony Perkins was the first player off the bench for the Tigers and hit a layup with 13:28 left to put Missouri in front 7-5, then a Tamar Bates jumper with 10:22 left gave Missouri the lead it would keep the rest of the first half at 13-12.

Shaw slammed down a dunk off an Anthony Robinson steal, then hit a right-wing 3 to put Missouri up 18-14.

Caleb Grill dished an alley-oop to Shaw before Robinson hit a free throw and dished an assist to Pierce for a fast break dunk to increase the lead to 23-16.

Robinson hit a step-back 3 from the left corner to extend the lead to 29-19 with 6:44 left, but was immediately called for a technical foul for taunting the Memphis bench.

Advertisement

Pierce hit a 3 to extend the lead to 36-22, Missouri’s largest of the night, with 5:04 left in the first half, then hit a layup off a Grill steal to make it 38-25.

Pierce ended with 10 points in the first half and 13 overall, a career high after beating his best mark of 12 that came against Illinois last year as a freshman.

Tyrese Hunter hit two free throws for Memphis to cut Missouri’s lead to 42-32 going into halftime.

Missouri extended back to a 13-point advantage early in the second half when Duke transfer Mark Mitchell turned a steal into an assist to Grill for a fast break dunk, but Memphis quickly cut it back to a 9-point game as Moussa Cisse slammed down a dunk and PJ Haggerty drove for a layup.

Cisse ended with 14 points, seven rebounds and two blocks, while Haggerty had a game-high 25 points on 7-of-16 shooting (10-of-11 at the free-throw line), six rebounds and five assists..

Advertisement

Missouri got back to an 11-point lead with 14:22 left when Tamar Bates hit a pull-up 3, but a Haggerty response 3 cut the lead under 10 points for good.

Dain Dainja used a Haggerty assist for a layup to bring the game to 55-51, then Hunter hit a fast break layup to bring it to 55-53 before Hunter hit a 3 to give Memphis its first lead since the 10:23 mark of the first half.

Gates called a timeout, but the damage was done. Missouri would not retake the lead.

Haggerty extended the lead to five with a layup with 6:39 left, then he made it eight with a free throw at the 5:30 mark.

Hunter created a double-digit margin with a layup that gave Memphis a 76-65 advantage with 1:54 left to play and a PJ Carter 3 gave Memphis its biggest lead of the night at 79-67 with 1:18 left.

Advertisement

Robinson led Missouri with 16 points and seven assists to go with four rebounds, while Bates had 13 points, three assists and three boards.Shaw had 11 points on a perfect shooting night as he was 4-of-4 overall, 1-of-1 from 3 and 2-of-2 at the free-throw line.

Missouri shot 26-of-57 (45.6 percent) overall, 7-of-24 (29.2 percent) from 3 and 16-of-25 (64.0 percent) at the free-throw line.

After shooting 18-of-33 (55 percent) from the floor in the first half, Missouri hit just 8-of-24 (33.3 percent) in the second.

Memphis won the rebounding battle 37-30, but Missouri held a 24-16 lead in points off turnovers and had 11 steals to Memphis’ eight.

“I liked what I saw from a standpoint of our connectivity, our team,” Gates said. “Memphis is a good team, they were able to get on some runs. We weren’t able to execute and we threw the ball away. Having four assists and 11 turnovers in that second half compared to those numbers in the first, that’s where the game got away.”

Advertisement

Missouri (0-1) will return to Mizzou Arena for its home opener against Howard at 7 p.m. Friday.

Head on over to the Tiger Walk to discuss this game and so much more.



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Scouting report: Missouri

Published

on

Scouting report: Missouri


Scouting report: Missouri

Oklahoma and Missouri isn’t a “rivalry” game, but it’s likely a game that both fanbases have had circled for some time.

Though for the Sooners, the stakes might be a little higher.

Advertisement

The Sooners (5-4, 1-4 SEC) got back on track last weekend against Maine, but they still face the task of attaining bowl eligibility. Considering their remaining schedule includes Alabama and at LSU, and they’ve struggled significantly in SEC play this season, this weekend is likely their best chance to snap a three-game conference losing streak and snag a highly-coveted sixth win.

The Tigers (6-2, 2-2) have a fine record, but the season has been a sight disappointment so far. Considered a dark horse candidate to win the SEC, and potentially make the College Football Playoff, they’ve lost two of their last three games by a combined score of 74-10. Three of their wins have come by six points or fewer, and that includes a 27-21 victory over Boston College.

But they’ve been a bit hamstrung by injuries particularly to quarterback Brady Cook, who sustained a hand injury in last month’s 34-0 loss to Alabama. Cook’s status is unclear for this weekend, and if backup Drew Pyne is forced back into action, that would present a major blow to the Tigers’ offense.

The Tigers are a 3.5-point home favorite this weekend. The Sooners need a win to secure bowl eligibility. The Tigers need a win to keep themselves viable in the playoff race. Considering the recent history between these two teams — the battles for Cayden Green and Williams Nwaneri come to mind — and that this’ll be the first time these two teams have faced off since 2011 when they were Big 12 foes, there’s a lot of anticipation for this one.

Here’s an early look at the Tigers and what the Sooners can expect:

Advertisement

GAME INFO

When: 6:45 p.m. CT

Where: Faurot Field at Memorial Stadium, Columbia, Missouri

TV: SEC Network

Radio: 107.7 FM

SERIES HISTORY

All time series record: OU leads 67-24-5

Advertisement

Last meeting: OU won 38-28, Sept. 24, 2011

MISSOURI STATS

Scoring offense: 27.8 points per game (70th nationally)

Scoring defense: 17.88 points per game (17th)

Total offense: 399.5 yards per game (61st)

Total defense: 299.6 yards per game (13th)

Advertisement

Rushing offense: 171.6 yards per game (55th)

Rushing defense: 134.9 yards per game (54th)

Passing offense: 227.9 yards per game (70th)

Passing defense: 164.8 yards per game (10th)

Key players

Brady Cook, QB

Advertisement

196.88 yards per game, 62.8% completion, 11 total TD, 1 INT

Drew Pyne, QB

49.6 yards per game, 63.6% completion, 0 TD, 3 INT

Nate Noel, RB

503 yards, 85 carries, 5.9 yards per carry, 2 TD

Advertisement

Marcus Carroll, RB

83 carries, 401 yards, 4.8 yards per carry, 6 TD

Theo Wease Jr., WR

37 receptions, 482 yards, 13.03 yards per reception

Luther Burden, WR

Advertisement

40 receptions, 450 yards, 4 TD

Marvin Burks Jr., S

47 tackles, 1 INT

Corey Flagg Jr., LB

43 tackles, 3.5 TFLs, 1 sack, 1 INT

Advertisement

Johnny Walker Jr., DE

21 tackles, 5.5 TFLs, 4.0 sacks

STORYLINES

OU’s rushing attack

The Sooners have found a rhythm running the ball the last two weeks. They rushed for 207 yards against Ole Miss — not including yards lost from sacks — on over four yards per carry. They kept that going last weekend against Maine, rushing for 386 yards on over seven yards per carry. Jovantae Barnes has been the engine, rushing for 340 yards on 6.7 yards per carry.

They have an excellent chance to keep that going against a suspect Missouri rushing defense. Their weak point has been defending the run — they’ve allowed 4.4 yards per carry this season, which ranks 76th nationally. In their losses to Texas A&M and Alabama, they allowed 6.56 and 7.32 yards per carry, respectively.

Advertisement

Considering the Tigers have been much better at defending the pass, the Sooners are going to have to establish the run. It’s not going to be easy, particularly as Michael Tarquin, Jacob Sexton and Jake Taylor work through issues. But given the Sooners’ success running the ball, and Missouri’s struggling to defend it, that’s going to have to be a focus on Saturday.

Who is at quarterback for Missouri?

It’s unclear whether Cook or Pyne will be at quarterback, and that will arguably have the biggest impact on the game.

Cook has been efficient this season and has done a good job of taking care of the ball. He’s averaging 11.5 yards per completion and has shown an ability to move the ball down the field.

When Pyne is in the game, the offense completely stalls. Not only has he been turnover prone, he’s shown incapable of operating a viable offense. He’s averaging fewer than 7.1 yards per completion. He played most of the game against Alabama after Cook exited with an injury, completing six of 12 passes for 42 yards and three interceptions.

Advertisement

If it’s Pyne at quarterback, the OU defense will be able to let loose. They’ll be able to blitz Pyne while not being afraid of anything hurting them down the field. But if it’s Cook at quarterback, it’ll be a much different task for OU’s defense.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending