Milwaukee, WI
Police question Milwaukee city attorney settlements
IN BRIEF
- Police union criticized City Attorney Evan Goyke over police misconduct settlements.
- Cases included multimillion-dollar payouts and missed legal deadlines.
- Goyke defended settlement decisions as ethical and fiscally responsible.
Milwaukee’s city attorney is under scrutiny after the police officers’ union criticized the office’s decision to reach settlements in police misconduct cases.
In a letter to city officials, Milwaukee Police Association President Alex Ayala pointed to costly settlements City Attorney Evan Goyke’s office approved and the union says raise questions over the office’s legal defense of police officers.
The targets of the criticisms include an assistant city attorney who missed a deadline in a case that ended in a $185,000 settlement and the office’s decision not to fight another case that ended in a $2.5 million settlement.
“It is not clear to us whether the City Attorney’s Office currently has a litigator with sufficient expertise or competence to actually litigate complex civil rights cases through jury trial,” Ayala’s letter to Goyke reads.
In a statement, Goyke defended his office’s work and said his office “remains committed to lawful, ethical and professional service, careful stewardship of taxpayer resources, and ensuring that the City of Milwaukee acts within the bounds of the law.”
“As an elected office, the City Attorney is accountable to the voters and has a professional obligation to provide independent, objective legal advice to City officials and departments,” he said. “Our attorneys make decisions based on the law, the facts and their ethical duties. We are charged with providing our clients with the highest level of legal service, and I am confident we meet that standard.”
In the statement, Goyke, in turn, voiced his disappointment that the MPA and its attorneys did not engage directly with him.
“I know them, we’ve met previously and I’ve offered a direct line to me if issues arise,” he said. “It’s unfortunate they’ve ignored that invitation and engaged in a political game instead.”
Since Goyke started a four-year term as city attorney in April 2024, his office has agreed to large settlements in the cases for Danny Wilber and Keishon Thomas. Both are among the city’s most expensive settlements ever.
Wilber’s was for $6.96 million and is the second largest ever. It was not mentioned by the police union. It came after the man spent almost 18 years in prison and was released after a court deemed his court hearing was unfair.
The settlement in Thomas’ case, however, was one of three cases the police union pointed to.
Thomas was a 20-year-old Milwaukee man who in 2022 died of a drug overdose while in police custody for about 16 hours. On Dec. 2, a $2.5 million settlement was approved in that case.
It came after Thomas spent 16 hours in police custody before dying. Officers were convicted of criminal charges in the incident and faced department discipline for their inaction. Officers failed to check on Thomas’ condition and did not send him to the hospital even after he told officers he ingested drugs.
The Thomas case was resolved quickly as it seemed likely the city would lose a verdict, Goyke’s statement said. Engaging in a lengthy litigation would “only delay the outcome, risk incurring greater costs, and withholding settlement from the children of a man that died while in the City’s care,” the statement said.
The other case mentioned was that of Sedric Smith, whom the city settled with for $180,000. That came after his lawsuit said he was stabbed by a man police failed to remove a knife from.
That occurred in 2024 when Smith was working as a hospital security guard, according to court records. It came after Smith and other security restrained a man who had become threatening toward him.
When police arrived, they called an ambulance for the man and did not take away a knife in his belongings, according to the court records. The man was taken to the hospital Smith worked at and later stabbed him.
Smith filed a lawsuit in February, and an assistant city attorney missed a response deadline in the case. U.S. District Judge J.P. Stadtmueller, who was overseeing the case, was critical of the missed deadlines.
In a court filing, Assistant City Attorney Naomi Sanders cited staffing shortages, a hefty caseload and a staffer failing to submit deadlines to her calendar as among the issues she was facing.
The case was headed to a default judgment before the city and attorney’s office reached the settlement.
Goyke acknowledged and took the responsibility of the error made in the Smith case, noting that there were “consequences for the error and improvements implemented to ensure it does not happen again.”
Ayala did not respond to a Journal Sentinel request for comment.
A spokesperson for the Milwaukee Police Department referred questions to the police union and Goyke’s office.
The union’s decision to point to the cases of Keishon Thomas and Isaiah Taylor drew criticism from the attorney who represented both.
To fight the Thomas case and others Ayala highlighted would be a waste of taxpayer money, attorney Mark Thomsen said.
“The Milwaukee Police Association should not be defending officers and former officers that pled guilty or were found responsible for their criminal conduct,” said Thomsen, an attorney with Gingras, Thomsen and Wachs. “The reputational harm to the Milwaukee police officers were the result of the officer’s criminal conduct, not the resolution of a case.”
In his letter, Ayala said Goyke’s handling of the Thomas case was part of the reason he was questioning the city attorney’s legal representation for officers. Ayala described the case as “very defensible.” He suggested it should’ve been taken to a federal jury trial.
“We believe that ineffective legal representation is the real reason that cases like Thomas are settled for astronomical sums,” he said.
The union should be “ashamed” of its defense of the officers involved in the case, Thomsen told the Journal Sentinel.
Thomsen also represented another case Ayala pointed to, that of Isaiah Taylor, the son of Lena Taylor, a Milwaukee County circuit judge and former member of the Wisconsin State Senate. The city paid out $350,000 in the Taylor case.
Taylor’s lawsuit said the officers racially profiled him and he was subject to unreasonable seizure and search.
At the time of Taylor’s arrest, he was 16 and delivering a turkey to a neighbor in December 2015 when two officers stopped him.
Officers frisked him, searched his bag and detained him in their squad car while they checked to see if he had any outstanding warrants, according to court records. Robberies had been reported in the area beforehand.
Officers involved in his arrest were initially cleared by a jury, but a federal appeals court granted Taylor a new jury trial on appeal. The city then settled the case.
Thomsen said the officers’ actions were unjustified and illegal.
The police union has previously not shied from criticizing the city’s handling of police misconduct settlements, which have a long history of being costly in Milwaukee.
In 2021, the city approved a $750,000 settlement in the case of former Milwaukee Bucks player Sterling Brown, after police grew confrontational and aggressive, including using a taser on him. Police body camera footage showed Brown staying calm throughout the incident and led to a rework of several police policies.
The police union and the Milwaukee Police Supervisors Organization were critical of that settlement, in the months before its final approval.
“We have no confidence in your ability to legally and ethically represent our members on, at the very least, this case,” a joint letter to then-City Attorney Tearman Spencer read in 2020.
The city has settled at least 290 of the cases since 1986, according to data provided by the City Attorney’s Office. That totals over $65.5 million.
At times, the cases’ costs have increased as the city has hired outside legal counsel to fight them. For instance, in 2025, the city hired a Chicago-based law firm for the Danny Wilber case that ended in a settlement.
That’s been the case from before Goyke’s tenure as well. In 2017, then-City Attorney Grant Langley spent $1.5 million to help with an illegal strip search lawsuit.
The city is self-insured, which means taxpayers bear the costs of any settlements.
Milwaukee, WI
Landmark Credit Union Live officially opens in Milwaukee
MILWAUKEE – Landmark Credit Union Live, Milwaukee’s newest concert venue, opened its doors on Friday. And with the Bucks playing next door at the same time, the whole area was hopping.
What they’re saying:
Fans flocked to Fiserv Forum to watch the team play the New York Knicks, and music lovers stood in line to see Rainbow Kitten Surprise on the opening night of Landmark Credit Union Live.
FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android
“Very busy, very crowded the bars and restaurants,” said Ashley Evans. “That’d be great to add to the city again, to continue to bring more tourists out.”
“This is going to be amazing. I’ve been wanting to see them for a very long time, so I’m very excited,” said Rachel Lococo.
Fans line up for the official opening of Landmark Credit Union Live
Landmark Credit Union Live can host up to 4,500 people. Friday night’s show was sold out, drawing fans from places like Chicago, Minnesota, Iowa and elsewhere.
“Some people have driven from Indiana, so there’s a lot of people coming out tonight,” said Kade McCane, who came from Madison. “Honestly, really exciting to be among the first people who get to be there, and for RKS to be among the first people who will ever perform here, I hope this venue gets huge and big and becomes very popular.”
The excitement was felt all around Milwaukee. Even the competition rolled out the welcome mat.
SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News
“Our goal to grow as a city means that a lot of things have to happen. This is the very, tiny, small work that has to happen,” said Gary Witt, president and CEO of The Pabst Theater Group, which runs six nearby venues.
“The introduction of any new business in the city, especially one that pays attention to the fact that we have spent 24 years growing the live culture economy in the city of Milwaukee, says to me that we’ve done our job.”
Witt said live entertainment is an industry Milwaukee’s economy has been dependent on coming from visitors like those who turned out Friday.
The Source: FOX6 News interviewed the people in this story and referenced prior coverage related to the opening of Landmark Credit Union Live.
Milwaukee, WI
Sheriff’s Office backpedals on controversial facial recognition deal
Drone view shows Milwaukee’s County Courthouse
Built in 1931, Milwaukee’s historic County Courthouse is in dire need of repair and upgrades. Here’s a recent drone view of the MacArthur Square building.
The Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Office will not move forward on a potential deal to use facial recognition technology, Sheriff Denita Ball announced Friday.
In a statement on Feb. 27, Ball said after “thoughtful evaluation” and “meaningful dialogue” with community stakeholders and leaders, she decided to stop pursuing a contract with Biometrica, a Las Vegas-based company whose technology allows authorities to compare photos to a large database of photos for matches.
“While we recognize the potential of this software as an investigative tool, we also recognize that trust between the MCSO and the people we serve is important,” she said.
“My discussions with local advocates highlighted valid concerns regarding how such data could be accessed or perceived in the current national climate. This decision is not a retreat from innovation but rather an understanding that timing matters, too,” Ball said.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported on Feb. 17 that the Sheriff’s Office was on the verge of signing off on the use of facial recognition technology after news broke at a community advisory board meeting held by the office.
The update on the office’s sign-off on an intent to enter into a contract with Biometrica blindsided local officials and advocates because it contradicted earlier claims that the office had not moved forward with a controversial contract.
At the time, supervisors on the county’s judiciary and legislation committee called for more information from the Sheriff’s Office about the nature of the then-potential contract.
Supervisor Justin Bielinski, who chairs the committee, said Ball’s decision to step away from the deal was good news, but said he was still feeling wary.
“I would like to see more I guess,” he said of the two paragraph statement from Ball. “At what point would she reconsider, right?”
County Executive David Crowley, who is running for governor as a Democrat, had also voiced concerns about a possible contract when news came to light earlier this month.
After learning of Ball’s decision to not move forward with Biometrica, Crowley thanked community members who voiced concerns about facial recognition technology, saying he will “continue doing everything in my authority to ensure our residents’ First Amendment rights, civil liberties, and personal data are protected.”
In recent months, Milwaukee politicians and residents rebuffed local law enforcement’s efforts to pursue the use of such technology at both the city and county levels, with many citing concerns over racial bias and unjust surveillance of residents.
The Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors voted last summer to recommend the development of a policy framework for the use of facial recognition technology as worries about its use by local law enforcement grew in the community.
The policy emphasized that the use of such technology doesn’t “suppress First Amendment-related activities, violate privacy, or otherwise adversely impact individuals’ civil rights and liberties,” and called for a pause on acquiring new facial recognition technology until regulatory policies were in place to monitor any existing and new surveillance technology.
In early February, the Milwaukee Police Department paused its pursuit of facial recognition technology after almost a year of pushback from activists and some public officials at public meetings. The department also noted that community feedback was a part of its final decision as well as a volatile political climate amid the federal government’s immigration crackdown.
(This story was updated to add new information.)
Milwaukee, WI
Milwaukee judge calls out marijuana odor in courthouse
A Milwaukee County judge on Thursday, Feb. 26, criticized the smell of marijuana inside the courthouse during a sentencing hearing, calling it inappropriate and illegal as visitors described the odor as common.
-
World3 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts3 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Montana1 week ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Louisiana5 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Denver, CO3 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Technology1 week agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Technology1 week agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making
-
Politics1 week agoOpenAI didn’t contact police despite employees flagging mass shooter’s concerning chatbot interactions: REPORT