Connect with us

Milwaukee, WI

Bizarre lawsuit accuses billionaire Milwaukee Brewers owner of using EXTREME methods to maintain the coastline by his Malibu home

Published

on

Bizarre lawsuit accuses billionaire Milwaukee Brewers owner of using EXTREME methods to maintain the coastline by his Malibu home


Malibu billionaires are at each other’s throats in a scramble to stop their multi-million dollar homes tumbling into the sea, with one accused of stealing the sand that is holding them all up.

Financier James Kohlberg is suing neighbor Mark Attanasio after the Milwaukee Brewers owner allegedly sent his diggers onto the beach to grab ballast for his own personal sea wall.

Attanasio, who seized control of England’s Norwich City soccer club on Monday, is accused of snatching the fast-disappearing sands of Broad Beach where celebrities including Dustin Hoffman, Pierce Brosnan and Robert DeNiro dip their toes.

[perform-sport]

Advertisement

In its place he has left gasoline residue in the water, and prevented his well-heeled neighbors from accessing the beach, it is alleged.

‘This case is about a private property owner using a public beach as their own personal sandbox, and the disturbing conversion of a public natural resource (ie sand from Broad Beach) for a nearby homeowner’s personal, private use,’ the lawsuit claims.

Milwaukee Brewers owner Mark Attanasio is being sued for ‘using a public beach as their own personal sandbox’ by his well-heeled neighbors in Malibu, California

The billionaire financier allegedly sent his diggers onto Broad Beach to steal the sand

The billionaire financier allegedly sent his diggers onto Broad Beach to steal the sand  

Attanasio, 66, is the co-founder of the Los Angeles-based Crescent Capital Group which had more than $43 billion under management earlier this year.

He bought his beachfront home for $23 million in 2007 and snapped up the empty lot next door for $6.6 million ten years later.

Kohlberg, his immediate neighbor is the chairman of the eponymous private equity firm which he co-founded with his father, the Wall Street financier Jerry Kohlberg in 1987.

Advertisement

He has dabbled in film-making and writing fiction, and bought his beachfront house for $14.2 million in 2021.

But the powerful ocean currents of the Malibu coast have been scooping 35,000 cubic yards of sand from the beach each year for the last five years leaving the foundations of the homes perilously exposed.

A consortium of neighbors including Hoffman, Brosnan, and comedian Ray Romano came together in 2015 to fund a $31 million project to protect the beach’s sand, but the rate of erosion is expected to reach 60,000 cubic yards per year.

The Bronx-born Attanasio who bought his Wisconsin baseball team in September 2004 secured permits to repair a damaged section of the seawall outside his home in March this year, the lawsuit states.

Neighbor James Kohlberg described the move as 'indecent and offensive to the senses'

Neighbor James Kohlberg described the move as ‘indecent and offensive to the senses’

Kohberg bought his beachfront house at 31444 (left) for $14.2 million in 2021, moving in next door to Attanasio who bought his at 31430 (right) for $23 million in 2007

Kohberg bought his beachfront house at 31444 (left) for $14.2 million in 2021, moving in next door to Attanasio who bought his at 31430 (right) for $23 million in 2007

The Kohlberg & Company founder whipped out his phone when he saw the diggers plowing up the beach outside his home

He claims the diggers have polluted the environment and blocked access to the beach

The Kohlberg & Company founder whipped out his phone when he saw the diggers plowing up the beach outside his home 

Two months later his excavators were on the beach, dragging the sand back to his now $34 million property.

Advertisement

The lawsuit claims that the work is imperiling local sea life and demand he be fined for the alleged damaged, ordered to stop work, and forced to replace the sand he is accused of stealing.

‘His intended and unlawful actions are potentially harmful to health, are indecent and offensive to the senses, obstruct the free use of public property and interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of Broad Beach and the surrounding properties.’

The Malibu sand grab is just the latest in a series of legal spats involving Californian billionaire beach boys accused of eroding the rights of other users.

Venture capitalist Vinod Khosla has been fighting for more than a decade to keep a secluded beach to himself next to his 89-acre, $32.5 million property in Half-Moon Bay, 35 miles south of San Francisco.

In May a California state judge threw out his bid to stop a lawsuit by the California State Lands Commission and Coastal Commission which would allow the public to return.

Advertisement

The state Constitution guarantees public access to all beaches below the high tide line.

But private landowners are not always required to allow access to the coastline across their properties.

Khosla’s legal team has slammed what is describes an attempt to ‘seize our client´s private property without compensation’.

Attanasio, pictured with the Brewers' Ryan Braun and wife Debbie, bought his baseball team in 2004 and seized control of England¿s Norwich City soccer club on Monday

Attanasio, pictured with the Brewers’ Ryan Braun and wife Debbie, bought his baseball team in 2004 and seized control of England’s Norwich City soccer club on Monday 

‘While such tactics are commonplace in communist systems, they have never been tolerated in the American system where the US Constitution precludes the government from simply taking private property and giving it to the public,’ said lawyer Dori Yob Kilmer.

Lawyers for Attanasio, who sold another house up the beach for $24 million in August last year insist he and his company, 2XMD Partners LLC, have done nothing wrong.

Advertisement

‘2XMD is in the midst of a fully-permitted emergency repair of the property to protect it from ocean forces,’ lawyer Kenneth Ehrlich told the LA Times.

‘It has secured all permits necessary for the repairs from the City of Malibu and LA County as well as thoroughly vetted all contractors and sub-contractors involved in the project.’



Source link

Milwaukee, WI

Supervisor calls for referendum on Milwaukee County courthouse revamp

Published

on

Supervisor calls for referendum on Milwaukee County courthouse revamp


play

  • A Milwaukee County supervisor is calling for a public vote on the financing of the county’s courthouse renovation project.
  • The estimated cost to overhaul the nearly 100-year-old complex has doubled to approximately $897 million.
  • Officials have described the current courthouse complex as outdated and a public safety concern.
  • The proposed referendum would require County Board approval for any additional financing needed for the project’s construction phase.

A Milwaukee County Board supervisor wants the public to weigh in on the county’s multi-million dollar project to revamp the the county’s downtown courthouse complex.

In early July, the county updated its project estimate to $897 million to overhaul the crumbling downtown courthouse complex, roughly doubling initial projections.

Advertisement

Supervisor Justin Bielinski, who has been the biggest opponent to the project on the board, authored a resolution calling for a contingent referendum on the Nov. 3 ballot. The referendum would ask voters whether they would require County Board approval for any additional financing needed for the construction phase of the courthouse project.

The resolution, which will go before the finance committee on July 23, also asks for the transfer of $18,000 from the appropriation for contingencies to the Milwaukee County Election Commission to offset the cost of the referendum.

“A capital project of this size is likely to require substantial long-term borrowing, debt service, and future budget commitments by Milwaukee County, which may place upward pressure on the property tax levy to service the debt issued to finance the project,” Bielinski’s resolution says.

The more than 320,000-square-foot Courthouse Complex is almost 100 years old and is home to the county’s criminal courts, County Jail as well as the Sheriff’s and District Attorney’s offices. The existing judicial buildings have been called “severely outdated” and “functionally obsolete,” creating public safety and security concerns over the years as its maintenance backlog exceeds $75 million.

Advertisement

Upon the release of new project estimates, County Executive David Crowley argued he expects his administration’s funding approach to cover the increased costs of the courthouse project and cut the cost to county property tax payers by more than $400 million by tapping other sources.

Crowley has described the project as urgent.

“The Public Safety Building has well surpassed the end of its life. The question in front of us isn’t whether we replace it, but when we will do it and how responsibly we can get it done,” Crowley said in a statement July 2.

The design phase of the new courthouse complex began in late 2024 and with initial timelines expecting to wrap up in 2028 and demolition set to start that year. Construction is expected to take place between 2029 and 2032.

Advertisement

So far, the county has allocated roughly $38.6 million between fiscal years 2024 and 2026 for the preliminary planning, design and consulting work for the project. Approximately $858 million will be needed for the remaining construction.

The county’s adopted capital budget for 2026 was limited to the approved bonding cap of $56.8 million, which leaves $63.3 million in requested bonding authority unfunded, Bielinski’s resolution says, adding that substantial borrowing for the project could limit the county’s ability to finance other major infrastructure needs, such as parks, transit, bridges, roads as well as other public facilities.

“Because of the magnitude and potential countywide fiscal impact of this project, Milwaukee County voters should have a voice through a contingent referendum before the County makes a final construction-phase funding commitment for the [courthouse] project,” the resolution said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

Milwaukee leaders condemn ICE arrests as agency ignores City mask ordinance

Published

on

Milwaukee leaders condemn ICE arrests as agency ignores City mask ordinance


MILWAUKEE, Wis. – Several Milwaukee leaders are condemning recent Immigrations and Customs Enforcement activity in the city, though questions remain whether actions meant to limit the agency within city limits can be enforced.

The group led by U.S. Congresswoman Gwen Moore expressed anger at the nature of the at least 57 confirmed arrests made by ICE agents across Wisconsin during “targeted operations” that began in late June.

“They’re ​being ​kidnapped. They’re ​being ​disappeared. ​They’re ​being ​rushed ​through ​a ​judicial ​process ​without ​due ​process because ​they ​don’t ​have ​any ​money. ​And ​we’re ​here ​to ​decry ​​that,” said Moore during a press conference July 9.

Back in April, Milwaukee Common Council members unanimously passed one of the key pieces of their “ICE Out MKE” package: an ordinance that prohibited ICE agents from wearing masks while working in the city. But the Department of Homeland Security has indicated they will not adhere to the ordinance, with representatives asserting the US Constitution’s Supremacy Clause allows for federal laws to supersede any local ordinance.

Advertisement

“State and local sanctuary politicians attempting to ban our federal law enforcement from wearing masks is despicable and a flagrant attempt to endanger our officers,” said an ICE spokesperson in a statement to WTMJ. “To be crystal clear: we will not abide by unconstitutional bans. The Supremacy Clause makes it clear that state and local sanctuary politicians do not control federal law enforcement.”

During the recent arrests, ICE agents were spotted by groups like Voces de la Frontera wearing masks despite the ordinance. Agents also used the Milwaukee Police Department District 2 parking lot for staging purposes, which is against another “ICE Out” city ordinance. A statement from MPD said they were not told in advance that ICE intended to use the parking lot, and then asked them to leave.

No citations have been written by Milwaukee Police against any agents who have violated the mask ban, with the department citing the need for legal clarity from City Attorney Evan Goyke.

“We’re ​waiting ​to ​see what ​the ​city ​attorney’s ​advice ​will ​be ​on ​that,” said Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson July 9 when asked by WTMJ if any of the “ICE Out” package is enforceable.

ICE says those arrested will remain in custody pending removal proceedings.

Advertisement

TOP STORIES FROM THE WTMJ NEWSROOM:



Source link

Continue Reading

Milwaukee, WI

Milwaukee shooting Wednesday; 1 wounded near 11th and Locust

Published

on

Milwaukee shooting Wednesday; 1 wounded near 11th and Locust


Milwaukee Police Department (MPD)

A shooting in Milwaukee on Wednesday, July 8 left one person wounded. 

11th and Locust

Advertisement

What we know:

According to the Milwaukee Police Department, a 23-year-old was shot around  6:30 p.m. near 11th and Locust. 

The victim arrived at the hospital for treatment.    

Advertisement

The circumstances leading up to the shooting are under investigation.

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android

Advertisement

MPD tips

What you can do:

Milwaukee police are seeking information to identify a suspect in connection with this incident.   

Advertisement

Anyone with information is asked to contact Milwaukee police at 414-935-7360 or to remain anonymous, contact Crime Stoppers at 414-224-TIPS or P3 Tips.

The Source: The information in this post was provided by the Milwaukee Police Department. 

Crime and Public SafetyMilwaukeeNews
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending