Connect with us

Kansas

This fast-tracked disability tax credit bill is the first new Kansas law of 2024

Published

on

This fast-tracked disability tax credit bill is the first new Kansas law of 2024


Kansas politicians have enacted their first new law of 2024: a fast-tracked single-subject bill that reinstates an expired tax credit.

Gov. Laura Kelly signed Senate Bill 15 into law on Thursday after it passed the House 117-1 and 34-0. The legislation reinstates and makes changes to a tax credit designed to incentivize employment of Kansans with disabilities.

The tax credit had broad bipartisan support last session, too, but failed because of political logrolling by Republican legislators and the Democratic governor’s veto. That meant the tax credit expired at the end of 2023, prompting lawmakers to fast-track the legislation this session and make it retroactive to the start of 2024.

“Kansans with disabilities deserve a fair wage for the work they perform,” Kelly said in a statement. “I’m signing this bipartisan legislation to create more opportunities for people with disabilities, grow our workforce and ensure every Kansan can work with dignity and respect.”

Advertisement

The income tax credit is for goods and services purchased from qualified businesses that employ disabled workers and pay them at least as much as the minimum wage. The legislation also creates a new matching grant program to help transition sheltered workshop employers toward paying the minimum wage.

“By incentivizing businesses that purchase products from companies with integrated workforces, we are creating more jobs for Kansans with disabilities,” said Rep. Sean Tarwater, R-Stilwell, in a statement via the governor’s office. “This bill also helps those that make below minimum wage to get a pay increase. This spurs local economies across the state as the workforce grows and has additional money in their pockets.”

The minimum wage requirement was added last year following a contentious public hearing at which disability rights advocates took issue with the previous allowance for employers to pay less than $7.25 an hour.

Advertisement

Kansas Commission on Disability Concerns executive director Martha Gabehart said the new law is “a win-win for Kansans with disabilities and businesses.”

“The transition grants hold the opportunity to help providers switch from sheltered work to providing competitive integrated employment, enabling Kansas to join the growing list of states that have equalized the pay for people with disabilities by eliminating subminimum wage,” Gabehart said in a statement via the governor’s office.

Why lawmakers failed to get the tax credit renewed last year

Last session, the tax credit went through the normal legislative process in the House. The commerce committee, which Tarwater chairs, held a public hearing on House Bill 2275 before it was later passed by the full chamber 124-0.

But the Senate never took up the bill.

Instead, it came up in a conference committee, where top legislators on tax policy bundled dozens of separate bills into three packages.

Advertisement

The tax credit became part of the Senate Bill 8 bundle that was debated and voted on by the House on in the wee hours of the last day of regular session without time for legislators to read the legislation. It was passed by the Senate three weeks later.

Some of the pieces in the bundle were controversial, and Kelly vetoed it, saying the Legislature’s bundling “has made it impossible to sort out the bad from the good.” Lawmakers never attempted an override because they had already adjourned for the year, and they didn’t have veto-proof majorities anyway.

That meant the tax credit expired before legislators returned to Topeka for the 2024 session.

This session, instead of the Senate taking up HB 2275, legislators again turned to a conference committee. But this time, they didn’t bundle it with anything else. Instead, they gutted SB 15 to use as a shell for HB 2275, which was tweaked at the request of senators, who had not held a public hearing on the legislation.

Sen. Caryn Tyson, R-Parker, called it “a unique situation.”

Advertisement

“We know the urgency on this is because the program has sunset, and everybody understands that we are trying to get this done as quickly as possible,” Tyson said.

She initially said either the Senate tax or commerce committee could hold a hearing but acquiesced to negotiating in the conference committee.

“I don’t know why we would wait any longer,” Tarwater said.

Jason Alatidd is a Statehouse reporter for the Topeka Capital-Journal. He can be reached by email at jalatidd@gannett.com. Follow him on X @Jason_Alatidd.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Kansas

Too cold for school? Districts across Kansas face winter weather dilemma

Published

on

Too cold for school? Districts across Kansas face winter weather dilemma


SALINA, Kan. (KWCH)—School districts across Kansas responded differently to winter conditions on Tuesday morning, which brought subzero temperatures and dangerous windchills. With the air temperature and windchill being the biggest concerns, the question for districts was whether buses could get running and if students would be safe to wait on the buses.

The Salina school district held school on Tuesday after ensuring that buses were running. The district encouraged parents to bundle their children in layers, but excused absences for students who stayed home due to the weather.

“Ultimately, our parents and guardians have the option to keep their children home when they have concerns about getting to school safely in the bitter cold. At Salina Public Schools, the absence is excused by reporting it in keeping with regular reporting procedures at the child’s school,” the district said.

In Western Kansas, the Garden City school district canceled classes on Tuesday because the cold weather was too much for their buses. The district issued a statement saying, “Diesel fuel began to gel due to the temperature. This was creating an issue of getting the buses started and running correctly.

Advertisement

In the Wichita area, responses varied based on bus availability and the time that students had to spend outside. The Wichita school district canceled classes on Tuesday, as did several surrounding districts including Maize, Valley Center, Goddard and Haysville.

Several districts throughout Kansas, including McPherson, opted to start two hours late on Tuesday.

With cold weather and how school districts respond, Salina parent Terry Hill said that ultimately as parents, it’s important to remember one thing.

“I’m sure the school district makes their decisions based [on] many, many, many different criteria, weather being one of them,” he said. “It all comes down to if you feel that loss of a school day is that important.”

Hill said Salina Public Schools made the right call on Tuesday by leaving the decision as to whether or not students attended up to their parents.

Advertisement

“Giving us parents the option is good because it allows us to make a decision on if we want to subject our children to it or not,” he said. “if they feel like it’s safe enough to get buses out and get kids to and from school then I’m sure they’re making the right decision on that.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Kansas

Kansas organizations seek repeal of property tax tied to state building projects • Kansas Reflector

Published

on

Kansas organizations seek repeal of property tax tied to state building projects • Kansas Reflector


TOPEKA —  Three agriculture organizations, a lobbyist for real estate interests and a conservative think tank endorsed legislation Tuesday repealing a statewide property tax delivering $84 million to public building projects in Kansas.

Under a Senate bill, the state’s 1.5-mill property tax for constructing, equipping and repairing state buildings would be deleted. The state’s general treasury would be responsible for $75 million — a $9 million cut from this year’s property-tax allocation — dedicated to projects at universities, veterans’ homes and cemeteries, schools for blind and deaf children, state hospitals for people with mental illness or developmental disabilities, and the state’s juvenile correctional facility.

The bill says the general fund, which includes sales and income tax revenue, would be the source of $50 million earmarked for university building priorities. Separately, $25 million would be designated for other state building projects. The measure says lawmakers should raise appropriations to both funds by 2% annually.

The Legislature, however, would retain authority to reset on a yearly basis state spending on building maintenance.

Advertisement

The proposal was part of the Republican-led Legislature’s response to complaints about high property taxation in Kansas. During the 2024 legislative session, the House, Senate and Gov. Laura Kelly approved a $1.2 billion, three-year plan that concentrated on income tax policy. There were sales and property tax changes in that law, but the public was disappointed property tax adjustments took a back seat.

“This bill is a great starting point to provide much-needed relief to all Kansas property taxpayers,” said John Donley of Kansas Farm Bureau. “As we have testified in the past, the state and local government’s reliance on property taxes has reached a point where action must be taken.”

The Kansas Livestock Association and Kansas Grain and Feed Association shared comparable testimony with the Senate Assessment and Taxation Committee.

Mark Tomb, lobbyist with the Kansas Association of Realtors, said changing the source of funding for building projects at Kansas Board of Regents universities and other state agencies was overdue.

“The two funds addressed in this legislation support institutions that work with Kansas’ most vulnerable residents as well as support construction and repair of buildings under control of the Kansas Board of Regents,” he said. “Removing these property tax levies does not eliminate the state’s obligation to support these important programs.”

Advertisement

There was no question the state of Kansas could afford property tax relief simply by finding efficiencies in the state budget, said Dave Trabert, CEO of the Kansas Policy Institute.

Under Senate Bill 35, the change would occur in the fiscal year starting July 1, 2026. On July 1, 2027, an additional 2% would be allocated to the building funds. In that second year, it would equate to a $1 million bump for universities and a $500,000 upgrade for the other building fund. The law would sunset in 10 years, which means the Legislature would have to reconsider the program in 2036.

Blake Flanders, CEO of the state Board of Regents, offered conditional support for removal of a “vital and stable” source of funding for building objectives at state universities. The educational building fund had been the only consistent source of state dollars for academic and research building projects for 80 years, he said.

“We absolutely appreciate that property taxes in Kansas need to be addressed,” Flanders said. “Because facilities and the stewardship of those facilities are such an important aspect of what we offer our students, we can support the legislation with amendments I have in my testimony.”

He proposed the initial state general fund appropriation to universities be set at $56 million rather than $50 million. Annual increases should be pegged to the preceding three years’ growth in property valuations in Kansas, he said.

Advertisement

Flanders said the Board of Regents was implementing a capital renewal initiative requiring annual investment by universities in facilities maintenance equal to 2% of the building asset replacement values.

Colton Gibson, executive director of University Contractors Association of Kansas, said there were many examples of government failing to meet commitments for building maintenance through annual discretionary appropriations.

“Make no mistake, if we don’t pay for this now, we will pay for it later at a higher cost,” he said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Kansas

Chiefs vs. Texans Snap Counts: What’s the Plan for DeAndre Hopkins?

Published

on

Chiefs vs. Texans Snap Counts: What’s the Plan for DeAndre Hopkins?


The Kansas City Chiefs did enough to win against the Houston Texans in the divisional round of the NFL playoffs, but now it’s time for the reigning back-to-back champions to evaluate Saturday’s win while preparing for the Buffalo Bills in the AFC championship game.

What surprises came from the Chiefs’ usage of noteworthy players against Houston? A closer look at Kansas City’s snap counts tells several stories worth following.

The Chiefs’ tight end usage was largely par for the course with Travis Kelce recording 76% of Kansas City’s offensive snaps while Noah Gray took 57% and Peyton Hendershot took 27%, though those are season-low numbers for Kelce.

Kelce’s single-game low-percentage mark in 2024 was 77%, while his lowest total snap count number in the regular season was 44. It’s worth noting the slightly decreased workload for Kelce, but KC’s 51 total offensive snaps on Saturday were also a season-low for the Chiefs’ offense with Mahomes at quarterback.

Advertisement

The wide receiver rotation is where the Chiefs’ personnel usage becomes even more interesting.

Rookie Xavier Worthy led Chiefs receivers by taking 42 of the Chiefs’ 51 offensive snaps (82%). Worthy was also the only Chiefs wide receiver to catch a pass on Saturday. Kelce led KC’s pass catchers with Worthy and Gray in tow.

Meanwhile, Marquise “Hollywood” Brown took 34 snaps (67%) but received two incomplete targets. JuJu Smith-Schuster took 21 reps (41%) and was targeted once. DeAndre Hopkins took just 16 snaps (31%) and also received just one target. Justin Watson received his lightest workload of the season by a wide margin, recording only four snaps (8%). Watson’s previous season-low was his 21-snap day (34%) against the Pittsburgh Steelers on Christmas.

Hopkins’s snap count is also his lowest mark of the season after playing at least 23 snaps in every other game as a Chief. That 23-snap game (32%) was Hopkins’s Chiefs debut.

It’s hard to imagine Hopkins not receiving a larger workload in the AFC championship game, but it would have been hard to envision the veteran getting fewer than 20 snaps in the divisional round. While Watson appears to be largely phased out as the postseason rotation tightens, will Hopkins remain a niche player, or will the game plan evolve for Buffalo?

Cornerback Jaylen Watson took 40 of the Chiefs’ 68 defensive snaps (59%) on Saturday, giving Watson the second-highest workload among Chiefs cornerbacks, trailing only Trent McDuffie (63 snaps, 93%). The Chiefs’ next choice at cornerback was clearly defined as Steve Spagnuolo chose to play Nazeeh Johnson for 34 snaps (50%) while Chris Roland-Wallace took three snaps and Joshua Williams took zero.

Assuming that Watson felt good following Saturday’s showdown, his workload should increase against Buffalo. Still, the Chiefs will need to rely on at least three cornerbacks in coverage on a regular basis. With Chamarri Conner (50 snaps, 74%) back in the slot corner role for the vast majority of his work on Saturday, the Chiefs will likely plan on McDuffie, Watson and Conner staying on the field for the majority of the AFC championship game, while Johnson appears to have the clear upper hand over Williams as the next man up.

The Chiefs’ defensive line controlled much of the divisional round matchup, ending the game with eight sacks of Texans quarterback C.J. Stroud. Defensive end George Karlaftis led Chiefs D-linemen in sacks (three) and snaps taken (58, 85%), with defensive tackle Chris Jones (one sack, 52 snaps, 76%) close behind.

Advertisement

Mike Danna was next in snaps taken (43 snaps, 63%), just ahead of Tershawn Wharton (39, 57%) and Charles Omenihu (35, 51%). The rotation was rounded out by run-stuffers Mike Pennel (20 snaps, 29%) and Derrick Nnadi (nine snaps, 13%) in addition to second-year end Felix Anudike-Uzomah, who recorded a sack on one of his six snaps (9%).

Read More: NFL Announces Refereeing Crew for Chiefs vs. Bills AFC Championship Game





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending