Connect with us

Kansas

Kansas City traffic deaths keep going up, while its effort to make roads safer is underfunded

Published

on

Kansas City traffic deaths keep going up, while its effort to make roads safer is underfunded


You’re trying to cross the street, only to jump back after a speeding car blazes through the crosswalk. You’re biking to work but nearly get hit after someone runs a red light. You’re driving back from the grocery store and have to swerve to avoid a reckless driver.

Kansas City residents know these experiences all too well, but many aren’t lucky enough to avoid being hit. In 2023, 102 people died in traffic crashes, according to the Kansas City Police Department.

That’s an increase from 2022, when 89 people died in crashes, and the opposite direction that Kansas City hoped it would see.

For the last three years, the city’s Vision Zero program has worked to change roadways with the goal of eliminating traffic fatalities entirely by the end of the decade.

Advertisement

But Kansas City still has one of the country’s highest rates of fatal car crashes, and local advocates and leaders say the city’s fortune won’t change without more funding.

“There is a lack of political will to make all of the investments and changes necessary to not only allow Vision Zero to take root but to enable it to succeed,” says Michael Kelley, policy director with transit advocacy group BikeWalkKC and a member of the Vision Zero task force.

“Until that changes, we are going to continue to be in this rut where it is somewhat making progress,” Kelley continued. “We are making some strides, but we’re not moving entirely in the direction of a safer Kansas City for everyone.”

Behind Vision Zero

Carlos Moreno

Advertisement

/

KCUR 89.3

Cracked and root-pushed concrete disrupts the sidewalk along Locust Street between East Armour Boulevard and Gillham Road. Twenty percent of all people killed in traffic fatalities this year have been pedestrians.

In a city split by massive highways and imposing six-lane streets, Kansas City’s Vision Zero program tries to correct roads to be safer for all kinds of users — not just cars. Of those killed this year in crashes, 20% were pedestrians and 4% were on a bicycle.

Kansas City has multiple options for making existing roads safer, with varying degrees of difficulty and cost, depending on the specific needs of the area.

Across the metro, Kansas City has been slowly making intersection and crosswalk improvements and implementing “road diets,” reducing the number of driving lanes in favor of things like bike lanes, medians, widened sidewalks and even dedicated streetcar lanes.

Advertisement

Kansas City Council adopted the plan in 2020, but the city didn’t publish a final action plan until 2022. In the interim, the Public Works Department adapted road projects to the principles of the program.

City Manager Brian Platt said he believes that the new group of city council members, elected in August 2023, understand the urgency of Vision Zero.

“If anything, I’d say that the discussion and deliberation is more around how we do that and not if we should do that,” Platt said.

So far, most of the Vision Zero projects have been cheaper and quicker to build. Platt said that helps the city finalize the design and get feedback before making larger, more permanent changes.

One example is the Gillham Cycle Track — a two-way protected pedestrian and bike lane that connects the Plaza to the Crossroads — which the city is now trying to make stronger and more permanent.

Advertisement

However, the vast majority of fatal and serious injury crashes happen on just 12% of Kansas City roads, most notably Southwest Trafficway, Independence Avenue, Truman Road and Troost Avenue.

The city is slowly targeting those roads, known as the high injury network, but that requires more intricate fixes, and a lot more money.

Kansas City currently dedicates $500,000 a year to Vision Zero through General Obligation Bonds, which are paid off by property tax money but do not require a voter-approved tax increase. That money is only set to last through the 2025-26 fiscal year, however.

It’s also not enough to fund the projects the city already has planned.

“If you look at these projects we have, we’re only addressing intersections that are on the high injury network,” said Kansas City chief mobility officer Bailey Waters at a Vision Zero Taskforce meeting in December. “We’re not even able to go and look at doing corridors… with our existing funding, I don’t foresee us reaching our goal by 2030.”

Advertisement

What’s next for Vision Zero

Wide angle photo shows a section of roadway that is separated from vehicle traffic by white stanchions and six-inch concrete beams along the road. A large, white figure of a cyclist riding a bicycle lies on the pavement in the foreground.

Carlos Moreno

/

KCUR 89.3

The Gillham Cycle track is one of the most notable Vision Zero improvements. Platt said projects like this could be getting a more permanent redesign in the coming years.

The Public Works Department has 13 road improvement projects scheduled for 2024 under the Vision Zero program, which will use bonds and neighborhood PIAC funding. Those projects span the city, from the Northland to Waldo, from the Westside to 18th and Vine.

Advertisement

But they are still a fraction of the road improvements that Kansas City needs.

Public Works says it receives 200 neighborhood traffic calming requests each year through its 311 system. According to Waters, addressing those requests alone — with changes like speed humps and curb extensions — would cost about $5.4 million on their own.

Platt said he’s working with City Council and Mayor Quinton Lucas to consolidate and increase the money given to Vision Zero in the next budget.

Plus, a new federal Safe Streets and Roads for All grant will support a citywide speed limit review, where the city can analyze appropriate limits and investigate roads that have excessive speeding.

“We know that the data shows that the slower vehicles go, the less serious the injuries are and the fewer crashes we see,” Platt said. “That’s one of the main ways we help make our streets safer.”

Advertisement

Since Vision Zero began, minor injuries have decreased, but crashes where people are seriously injured or killed have remained consistently high.

The city will also update its Traffic Engineering and Operations manual to align with the mission, and help create a streets design guide — centralizing city planning resources for roads and green infrastructure so they include Vision Zero and Complete Streets priorities.

In that vein, Kansas City is also trying to fit projects that don’t fall directly under Vision Zero to align with the program’s principles.

That includes a recently announced $14 million plan at 75th and Wornall Road in Waldo, which includes upgraded pavement, intersection improvements and new sidewalks. The projected completion date is fall 2025.

In its 2022 action plan, the city found that fatal or serious injury crashes were twice as likely to happen in a transportation-disadvantaged area — where people have to spend more or take longer to get where they need to go. In Kansas City, those areas are primarily located east of Troost and in the Historic Northeast.

Advertisement

The report also found that Black people were twice as likely to be killed and nearly four times as likely to be injured in a traffic crash than white people.

Kansas City’s ordinance creating Vision Zero makes it clear that the program is meant to address such inequities. But not all of its projects are made the same.

A white, reflective sign sits in the foreground attached to a steel pole. The sign shows the silhouette of a bicycle and a person walking. There is a two-way arrow with the words "2-way crossing" below it. In the background a person riding a bicycle rides near rows of white stanchions marking a bicycle path which is also near a wide intersection marked with white-striped pedestrian markers.

Carlos Moreno

/

Advertisement

KCUR 89.3

Intersection and crosswalk improvements made under Vision Zero have helped decrease minor injuries from traffic crashes. But serious injuries and fatalities remain high, and the program needs more funding to be successful.

While most of the completed projects so far have been in the 3rd and 4th City Council districts, which covers those transportation-disadvantaged neighborhoods and much of downtown, those have also tended to be lower-cost efforts like speed humps and improved crosswalk signals.

Due to the scarcity of funding, most of the more permanent and more effective fixes have yet to be undertaken.

The other roadblock is external: Road safety projects aren’t always welcomed by their intended communities, something Kelley blames on a lack of engagement by the city.

Last year, bike lanes added to the 3rd district along Truman Road — a project that complimented, but wasn’t technically part of, Vision Zero — faced the threat of removal after residents and business owners complained. While City Council considered a compromise that would take away a bike lane on one side of the street, no action has been taken yet.

Advertisement

In other instances, Kelley said projects have been changed or held up because of controversy over where projects should go, and who deserves them first.

“There is still this mindset of, ‘If I give this place more, that means that I’m getting less,’” Kelley said. “We can’t continue to operate in a scarcity mindset because that inevitably means that the people who need it the most will continue to receive less than what they need to be safer.”

The Vision Zero task force says it’s working on an education campaign to make road improvement projects more understandable to residents, as well as less controversial. The city has also added a button to the 311 app and website so that residents can more easily make traffic-calming requests.

Kelley said the hardest part of his job is helping grieving families deal with the death of a loved one, “knowing they’re being killed on streets that we knew as a city were unsafe.”

Kelley wants to remain optimistic, though, that Kansas City will find a way to meet its goal.

Advertisement

“I have to be,” Kelley said, “because the alternative is I have more crying folks on the phone. More funerals and memorial services I’m asked to go to. I don’t want to think about a reality where we have more of that.”





Source link

Kansas

Kansas Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 winning numbers for Nov. 1, 2025

Published

on


The Kansas Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at Nov. 1, 2025, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from Nov. 1 drawing

02-26-43-44-62, Powerball: 22, Power Play: 2

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 3 numbers from Nov. 1 drawing

Midday: 0-7-2

Advertisement

Evening: 6-2-1

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning 2 By 2 numbers from Nov. 1 drawing

Red Balls: 25-26, White Balls: 09-18

Check 2 By 2 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Lucky For Life numbers from Nov. 1 drawing

06-19-28-38-46, Lucky Ball: 08

Advertisement

Check Lucky For Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Lotto America numbers from Nov. 1 drawing

08-11-23-31-47, Star Ball: 06, ASB: 02

Check Lotto America payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Super Kansas Cash numbers from Nov. 1 drawing

06-14-22-25-29, Cash Ball: 19

Check Super Kansas Cash payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

All Kansas Lottery retailers will redeem prizes up to $599. For prizes over $599, winners can submit winning tickets through the mail or in person at select Kansas Lottery offices.

By mail, send a winner claim form and your signed lottery ticket to:

Kansas Lottery Headquarters

128 N Kansas Avenue

Advertisement

Topeka, KS 66603-3638

(785) 296-5700

To submit in person, sign the back of your ticket, fill out a claim form, and deliver the form along with your signed lottery ticket to Kansas Lottery headquarters. 128 N Kansas Avenue, Topeka, KS 66603-3638, (785) 296-5700. Hours: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. This office can cash prizes of any amount.

Check previous winning numbers and payouts at Kansas Lottery.

When are the Kansas Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT Tuesday and Friday.
  • Pick 3 Midday/Evening: 1:10 p.m. and 9:10 p.m. CT daily.
  • 2 By 2: 9:30 p.m. CT daily.
  • Lucky for Life: 9:38 p.m. CT daily.
  • Lotto America: 9:15 p.m. CT Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Super Kansas Cash: 9:10 p.m. CT Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Kansas editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Kansas

Free rides offered for Kansas Mobility Week including Election Day

Published

on

Free rides offered for Kansas Mobility Week including Election Day


OCCK Transportation is offering free rides on Election Day, Nov. 4, as part of Kansas Mobility Week.

The free rides will be available on Salina CityGo, regional paratransit, GoAbilene, GoConcordia, 81 Connection and KanConnect, according to a community announcement. However, OCCK OnDemand services in Salina are not included.

Kansas Mobility Week, which runs from Nov. 2-8, is a statewide initiative aimed at promoting efficient and safe transportation choices. Public transportation providers, mobility managers, the Kansas Department of Transportation and other partners will host events throughout the week to encourage the use of multimodal transportation options and introduce new initiatives and policies.

OCCK normally offers free rides on Election Day each year to help increase voter turnout.

Advertisement

“We are excited to provide free rides again for Election Day and as a way to celebrate Mobility Week,” said Trell Grinter, transportation director for OCCK. “It’s a great opportunity for people to experience public transit and increase their mobility choices.”

For more information about OCCK, visit occk.com. For more information about CityGo and OCCK Transportation, visit salinacitygo.com or contact the OCCK Transportation Center at 785-826-1583.

More information on how to participate in this year’s Mobility Week is available at ksrides.org/mobility-week.

More information about the state’s Mobility Managers can be found at ksrides.org/our-team.

Advertisement

This story was created by reporter Charles Rankin, crankin@salina.com, with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journalists were involved in every step of the information gathering, review, editing and publishing process. Learn more at cm.usatoday.com/ethical-conduct.



Source link

Continue Reading

Kansas

The North Kansas City stadium site might just be the best one

Published

on

The North Kansas City stadium site might just be the best one


A lot has happened since John Sherman, principal owner of the Kansas City Royals franchise, first floated the idea of a new stadium in November of 2021. The road since then has been winding and frustrating, and four years and one failed vote later and we don’t know where the stadium is going or what it will look like.

But there is a light at the end of the tunnel. The Royals’ lease with the Truman Sports Complex ends after the 2030 season, which means they have to start on construction relatively soon to be ready by the 2031 season. Missouri and Kansas have both passed state-level funding. And the Royals had planned on announcing their final plan earlier this year, which implies they are close to an answer themselves.

Lately, there has been a lot of smoke surrounding the North Kansas City option. The office of NKC mayor Jesse Smith put out a press release on October 16 stating that:

The City of North Kansas City continues to have conversations with the Kansas City Royals regarding the possibility of a stadium and related development in North Kansas City. These discussions are substantial and will ultimately involve collaboration among the State of Missouri, Clay County, and the City in any final framework.

Additionally, the Missouri legislature had previously passed a bill that allows Clay County to create a sports complex authority that would govern the stadium. And we can’t forget that North Kansas City was one of two initial proposed sites by the Royals back in August 2023.

Advertisement

Like many folks, my reaction to the proposed Clay County site was one of skepticism. What was the point? To just leave a suburban area to go to another suburban area? Why not just stay in Kauffman Stadium?

I have since come around, and not because I am being paid off by the Royals. I have no idea what they’re doing and they have declined to comment on media requests about the stadium for a while now. No; I genuinely think that the North Kansas City site is the best one outside the East Village site, which seems dead. Let’s dig into why.

The Royals’ new stadium goals

So much has happened that it’s worth re-visiting the first real piece of official communication the Royals put into the world: an open letter from Sherman about what the Royals wanted to accomplish.

There are two things that stand out as clear benchmarks for what the Royals wanted the stadium to be from the very start of this project. First, though downtown was the primary goal, the Royals were cognizant that there were other sites that could work. They were pursuing sites “both in downtown Kansas City and close to it.”

Advertisement

Second, and most importantly, the Royals wanted to build a ballpark district, with “residential, commercial, and community components.” As Sherman wrote, their version was to construct “a new ballpark district and all that comes with it – one that is woven into the fabric of our city, can host events and concerts, and boosts our local economy.”

Why North Kansas City works

Kauffman Stadium is a beautiful park that exists within an ugly car dystopia that sucks the life out of the entire area. It’s surrounded by acres and acres of useless concrete. It’s cut off from goods, services, housing, and lodging. It is an unwalkable island wasteland.

Contrast that with walkable areas, where you don’t have to drive a car to get to where you want to go. More importantly, there are people already there. People live in walkable areas in multiunit apartments and condos, and walkable areas have narrower streets, more public transit, and a significantly higher density of resources and services than car-centric areas.

Downtowns are usually the only areas in American cities that have walkability and density. But suburbs can be walkable, too. Consider the area around Johnson Drive and Lamar in Mission, Kansas, versus the area around 119th Street and Strang Line Road in Olathe. Both Kansas City suburbs, but one is significantly prettier, more lively, and livable than the other.

Advertisement

North Kansas City is one of the only areas in the metro that has the ingredients for significant walkability. Indeed, the Armour Road area is already walkable and bikeable.

The above screenshot of Google Maps shows roughly where the Royals have proposed their site: bordered by Armour Road on the north and 16th Avenue on the south, and from Erie Street on the west to Howell Street on the east. North of Armour Road, there are rows and rows of houses, a public library, North Kansas City High School, and multiple new apartment complexes.

Add the streetcar into the equation, and the area quickly becomes an opportunity to transform into the type of urban neighborhood that is a destination. RideKC has already created an extensive and recent study of what an extension would look like up to North Kansas City, and their plan is to extend the line over the Heart of America Bridge and then up Swift Street.

And though walkability is key, car access is still easy. I-35 is immediately to the east, and there’s access to I-29, I-635, and Highway 169—along with access to downtown and I-70 via Highway 9.

So why wasn’t NKC the first choice?

Advertisement

No site is perfect, which I’m sure the Royals have grappled with significantly.

At the same time, there are some pretty big reasons why downtown is a better option than North Kansas City. One is population; the downtown KC population is about 32,000 people, compared to under 5,000 people in NKC as of the 2020 census. Furthermore, Jackson County has over two and a half times as many residents as Clay County, which is a significant difference when it comes to tax revenue and the inevitable “public” part of the “public-private partnership” that the Royals want.

And, of course, that streetcar thing? It’s already downtown.

But at this point in the juncture, North Kansas City is also the only place that fulfills all of the Royals’ initial desires for the project. The Washington Square Park site downtown is tiny and there is not space for a “ballpark village.” No site in Johnson County or Wyandotte County makes much sense for that, either, and a Legends site would end up as Kauffman Stadium West (derogatory).

If the Royals aren’t going to pull the trigger on the East Village site—which has always been the best choice—for whatever reason, North Kansas City provides a way to catalyze some public transit investment and transform the area into something the Royals can be proud of.

Advertisement

At least, if the public isn’t on the hook for too much money. But that, as they say, is a whole different ball game.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending