Connect with us

Indiana

2 people hurt when car crashes through Indiana Borough home

Published

on

2 people hurt when car crashes through Indiana Borough home


INDIANA BOROUGH, Pa. — A massive mess was left behind at a home in Indiana County after a car slammed into it early Saturday morning.

The Indiana Borough Police Department says the crash happened around 2:30 a.m. on Philadelphia Street near East Avenue.

Photos from the Indiana Fire Association show a car went through the first floor of the home, taking out a corner of the structure.

First responders temporarily placed a strut to keep the house from falling, then replaced them with sistered 2x4s. The car was lifted out of the backyard with a rotator.

Advertisement

Police say the home was occupied at the time of the crash, and a child was taken to hospital. His injuries are said to be minor.

The driver, who police identify as a man in his early 40s, was also taken to the hospital for minor injuries.

Fire officials with the Indiana Fire Association said this isn’t the first time this house has been hit by a car.

The residents were displaced for the night, and Channel 11 was told the property owner was on scene making arrangements for repairs.

Download the FREE WPXI News app for breaking news alerts.

Advertisement

Follow Channel 11 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch WPXI NOW





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Indiana

Emissions, mishaps from Northwest Indiana BP refinery draw ire of residents and activists

Published

on

Emissions, mishaps from Northwest Indiana BP refinery draw ire of residents and activists


WHITING, Ind. (CBS) — A series of mishaps at the BP Refinery in Whiting, Indiana brought hundreds of people to a contentious meeting with state regulators Thursday night.

This came as the company’s air permit is set to be renewed.

Residents and environmental activists have raised a number of concerns about the new permit. They want to know what will be done to prevent future incidents, and are calling for tighter emission limits.

Thick, dark smoke filled the skies above Whiting and beyond back on Thursday, Feb. 1 – as the refinery experienced a power outage. As a precaution, some employees were forced to evacuate, and fires typically seen shooting out of the refinery’s stacks were increased to burn off extra oil during the outage.

Advertisement
bp-refinery-flares.png

CapturedNews


This was described by BP as a normal process.

In January, a leak at the refinery sent the smell of natural gas wafting across state lines into Illinois.

“The bad air from Indiana comes to Illinois on a regular basis,” said concerned resident Mary Griswald.

Advertisement

A group of Northwest Indiana residents gathered in Whiting Thursday night – fueled by health concerns and armed with signs.

“We are fighting for public health,” said Thomas Frank of East Chicago.

The majority spoke against the refinery and its emissions.

“How are we living in a first-world country where you can’t even provide clean air to us?” said Grace Tafoya of Gary.

“This is not fantasy,” said Ashley Williams of Michigan City. “This is life in the sacrifice zone of Northwest Indiana.”

Advertisement

Leaders with the Indiana Department of Environmental Management – or IDEM – are responsible for renewing BP’s air permit, which is set to expire.

“We are hoping that they will deny this permit,” said Susan Thomas. “I think these communities are very tired of being dumped on.”

Environmental justice advocates say the permit does not go far enough to protect the people of Northwest Indiana.

“We also want better fence-line monitoring for the facility, given the events that have happened the last two months,” said Ellis Walton, an associate attorney at the Environmental Law & Policy Center.

“How much longer can we continue like this?” said Thomas. “It’s unsustainable.”

Advertisement

Last year, BP was fined a record $40 million by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for violating environmental regulations.

BP did not respond to a request for comment Thursday night, but has previously said they are interested in public input.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Indiana Pacers vs. Detroit Pistons live stream info, start time, TV channel: How to watch NBA on TV, stream online

Published

on

Indiana Pacers vs. Detroit Pistons live stream info, start time, TV channel: How to watch NBA on TV, stream online


Who’s Playing

Detroit Pistons @ Indiana Pacers

Current Records: Detroit 8-46, Indiana 31-25

How To Watch

  • When: Thursday, February 22, 2024 at 7 p.m. ET
  • Where: Gainbridge Fieldhouse — Indianapolis, Indiana
  • TV: Bally Sports – Detroit
  • Follow: CBS Sports App
  • Online streaming: fuboTV (Try for free. Regional restrictions may apply.)
  • Ticket Cost: $8.42

What to Know

The Pacers will be playing the full four quarters on Thursday, but they’re expected to have things wrapped up well before that. They will take on the Detroit Pistons at 7:00 p.m. ET at Gainbridge Fieldhouse after having had a few days off. The Pistons took a loss in their last matchup and will be looking to turn the tables on the Pacers, who come in off a win.

The oddsmakers set the bar high, but the Pacers and the Raptors didn’t disappoint and broke past the 245.5 point over/under last Wednesday. Indiana had just enough and edged the Raptors out 127-125. Winning is a bit easier when you nail 11 more threes than your opponent, as the Pacers did.

The Pacers’ success was the result of a balanced attack that saw several players step up, but Tyrese Haliburton led the charge by shooting 5-for-9 from long range and dropping a double-double on 21 points and 12 assists. Haliburton didn’t help the Pacers’ cause all that much against the Hornets last Monday but the same can’t be said for this game. The team also got some help courtesy of Pascal Siakam, who scored 23 points along with seven assists and five rebounds.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the Pistons’ recent rough patch got a bit rougher last Wednesday after their third straight defeat. The match between them and Phoenix wasn’t a total blowout, but with Detroit falling 116-100 on the road it was darn close to turning into one. The defeat unfortunately continues a disappointing trend for the Pistons in their matchups with the Suns: they’ve now lost seven in a row.

Indiana’s victory bumped their record up to 31-25. As for Detroit, they have been struggling recently as they’ve lost six of their last eight games, which is in line with their 8-46 record this season.

The Pacers were able to grind out a solid win over the Pistons in their previous meeting back in December of 2023, winning 131-123. Will the Pacers repeat their success, or do the Pistons have a better game plan this time around? We’ll find out soon enough.

Odds

Indiana is a big 11.5-point favorite against Detroit, according to the latest NBA odds.

The oddsmakers were right in line with the betting community on this one, as the game opened as a 11.5-point spread, and stayed right there.

Advertisement

The oddsmakers are expecting fireworks from the offense and set the over/under at a high 246.5 points.

See NBA picks for every single game, including this one, from SportsLine’s advanced computer model. Get picks now.

Series History

Indiana and Detroit both have 5 wins in their last 10 games.

  • Dec 11, 2023 – Indiana 131 vs. Detroit 123
  • Nov 24, 2023 – Indiana 136 vs. Detroit 113
  • Apr 07, 2023 – Detroit 122 vs. Indiana 115
  • Mar 13, 2023 – Detroit 117 vs. Indiana 97
  • Mar 11, 2023 – Indiana 121 vs. Detroit 115
  • Oct 22, 2022 – Indiana 124 vs. Detroit 115
  • Apr 03, 2022 – Detroit 121 vs. Indiana 117
  • Mar 04, 2022 – Detroit 111 vs. Indiana 106
  • Dec 16, 2021 – Indiana 122 vs. Detroit 113
  • Nov 17, 2021 – Detroit 97 vs. Indiana 89





Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Changes to Indiana antisemitism bill drains support from many in Hoosier Jewish community – Indiana Capital Chronicle

Published

on

Changes to Indiana antisemitism bill drains support from many in Hoosier Jewish community – Indiana Capital Chronicle


A major change to a bill that would define and ban antisemitism at Indiana’s public education institutions led to a reversal of support and opposition among those who testified on the proposal at the Statehouse Wednesday.

In contention is the removal of a definition of antisemitism adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), which was included in the original version of House Bill 1002

The IHRA’s “working definition” includes contemporary examples of antisemitism, like “denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor,” and “holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the State of Israel.”

Rep. Chris Jeter, R-Fishers (Photo courtesy of Indiana House Republicans)

Lawmakers in the Senate education committee amended the legislation on Wednesday to remove mention of IHRA and its examples of antisemitism, however. The newest draft of the bill instead defines antisemitism as “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews.”

Advertisement

The measure was unanimously approved by the committee and now heads to the Senate floor.

“We’ve made some changes to try to ensure that we’re not referencing outside entities, but that we’re making the definition our own in the code, and the bill really tries to strike a balance of not impeding on any free speech, but just saying if we fund state education, we want that education to reflect our values as a body,” said Rep. Chris Jeter, R-Fishers, who authored the priority measure for the House GOP caucus.

“We wanted to be careful about referencing sort of outside groups, because if their definition changes, we don’t want anybody to impose that ours is supposed to be changed,” he continued.

But numerous members of Indiana’s Jewish community said they can’t support the bill unless it codifies the IHRA definition into state law.

“I’m extremely disappointed that the amendment that passed did not include reference to the IHRA statement. This essentially gutted the bill we wrote, and now leaves Jews without equal protection,” said Allon Friedman, president of the Jewish Affairs Committee of Indiana, which helped craft the bill. “This is essentially abandonment of the Indiana Jewish community and unwittingly rewards our enemies. … The Jewish community is absolutely united on this issue — we do not want the bill without IHRA.”

Advertisement

What is the IHRA definition?

Indiana law already bans discrimination on the basis of race and “creed,” which means religion. The legislation specifies that antisemitism — bias against Jewish people — is religious discrimination and is not allowed within the public education system.

The definition approved by the Senate committee is part — but not all — of IHRA’s overall definition of antisemitism. 

By removing reference to IHRA, the bill excludes the alliance’s examples of contemporary antisemitism that would have also been outlawed in Indiana, including:

  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
  • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
  • Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.

Jeter filed an identical bill in 2023. It passed out of the House in a 97-0 vote but never received a committee hearing in the Senate, effectively killing the proposal. 

He conceded Wednesday “there was some issue with some of those examples,” though. 

“Anytime we do lists in bills and legislation, I feel like it gets a little iffy,” he told the Senate committee.

Advertisement

Before the amendment, critics of the proposal maintained it limits free speech and suggests criticism of a foreign government would count as anti-Jewish rhetoric.

More than two dozen people who testified against the original bill emphasized that criticism of the Israeli government does not amount to antisemitism. Some warned of witch hunts under the vague definition.

Many of those issues appeared to be resolved with the updated version of Jeter’s bill.

“Most of our concerns with this bill were related to very specific language that was in there that conflated antisemitism with criticism against the State of Israel. As this amendment stands now, most of those concerns have been addressed,” said Syed Ali Saeed, president of the Indiana Muslim Advocacy Network. “I don’t think the IHRA definition is the best definition. It’s not the most complete, most fluid definition that’s out there.”

Indiana lawmakers move forward with bills to ban antisemitism, expand workforce training funds

Advertisement

Maliha Zafar, executive director of the Indiana Muslim Advocacy Network, added that although the examples in the IHRA definition “undeniably address antisemitic sentiments,” the list is “concurrently overly broad and would have inadvertently stifled legitimate criticism and analysis of Israeli policies.”

Daniel Segal, representing Jewish Voice for Peace – Indiana, said the group “strongly objected” to the IHRA definition’s examples of anti semitism and its “confusing criticism of the State of Israel, and its policies, with antisemitism.”

“We believe that the amendments that have been made render this bill acceptable — the harmful elements have been removed,” Segal said. “The previous bill, we thought, was harmful to our Arab brothers and sisters, and we committed as Jews to ensuring that ‘never again’ is for everybody. And that includes Palestinians. As Jews, that is part of our faith and is part of what we learned from the horrible experience of the Holocaust.”

Jewish community withdraws support

Although originally in support of the bill, many from Indiana’s Jewish community said “hateful” and “harmful” acts of semitism will continue across the state’s colleges and universities unless the IHRA definition is added back in.

“As a Jewish student, we navigate a world where concealing our identity has become a necessity. On a campus where 10 to 12% of students are Jewish, incidents of antisemitism have skyrocketed by over 800%,” said Indiana University junior Kaylee Werner, who is also chair of the school’s Antisemitism Prevention Task Force. 

Advertisement

She pointed to vandalism and swastikas “stained” on campus walls, as well as “unfair treatment” against Jewish students by some professors.

“This is the harsh reality that we face daily. The House-passed IHRA statement offers a beacon of hope in this darkness. It equips our administration with the necessary tools to combat antisemitism effectively and educate our community,” Werner said. “In this conversation, there is no room for ambiguity. There is either hate, or there is acceptance. There’s either right, or there’s wrong. We urgently need this statement to clearly identify and denounce these acts as antisemitism.”

Rabbi Sue Silberberg, executive director at IU Hillel, additionally emphasized that “we need the bill as passed through the House in order to protect the Jewish students on campus who are suffering every single day.”

In this conversation, there is no room for ambiguity. There is either hate, or there is acceptance. There’s either right, or there’s wrong. We urgently need this statement to clearly identify and denounce these acts as antisemitism.

Advertisement

– Indiana University junior Kaylee Werner

“We must recognize that Jewish students are marginalized, hated and discriminated against based on their spiritual connection, and this is antisemitism. … They are being harassed, they are being bullied, and they are being marginalized,” she said, noting that — since the Hamas attack in October — she has been “working with and seeing students who are facing severe antisemitism on campus every single day, in a way that I have not seen in the past 35 years.”

Even so, Sen. John Crane, R-Avon, said antisemitism and mistreatment of “Jews or any ethnic or racial group” is “absolutely abhorrent, the challenge is whether “government will be able to solve that.” 

Advertisement

“I don’t think so,” Crane said. “I’m of a mind of a gentleman named Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who survived in the Russian Gulag, who said the line separating good and evil runs straight through the human heart. And at the end of the day, it’s a human problem that we’re going to have to be able to address, irrespective of whatever steps we attempt to take through governmental action.”

Several other Republican senators said Wednesday they were concerned about the amended bill, citing oppositional testimony from those in the Hoosier Jewish community. 

Those lawmakers still voted in favor of the bill but said they want additional changes on the chamber floor to address those grievances.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending