Connect with us

Illinois

Supreme Court rejects Trump’s bid to deploy National Guard in Illinois

Published

on

Supreme Court rejects Trump’s bid to deploy National Guard in Illinois


WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday rebuffed the Trump administration over its plan to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois over the strenuous objections of local officials.

The court in an unsigned order turned away an emergency request made by the administration, which said the troops are needed to protect federal agents involved in immigration enforcement in the Chicago area.

Although the decision is a preliminary one involving only Chicago, it will likely bolster similar challenges made to National Guard deployments in other cities, with the opinion setting significant new limits on the president’s ability to do so.

The decision marked a rare defeat for President Donald Trump at the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, after the administration secured a series of high-profile wins this year.

Advertisement

In doing so, the court at least provisionally rejected the Trump administration’s view that the situation on the ground is so chaotic that it justifies invoking a federal law that allows the president to call National Guard troops into federal service in extreme situations.

Those circumstances can include when “there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion” or “the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

The court ruled against the administration on a threshold question, finding that the law’s reference to the “regular forces” only allows for the National Guard to be called up if regular military forces are unable to restore order.

The court order said that Trump could only call up the military where they could “legally execute the laws” and that power is limited under another law called the Posse Comitatus Act.

“At this preliminary stage, the Government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois,” the court said.

Advertisement

As a result, the Trump administration has failed to show that the National Guard law “permits the President to federalize the Guard in the exercise of inherent authority to protect federal personnel and property in Illinois,” the court added.

The decision saw the court’s six conservative justices split, with three in the majority and three in dissent. The court’s three liberals were in the majority.

The dissenters were Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.

“I have serious doubts about the correctness of the court’s views. And I strongly disagree with the manner in which the court has disposed of this application,” Alito wrote in a dissenting opinion.

“There is no basis for rejecting the President’s determination that he was unable to execute the federal immigration laws using the civilian law enforcement resources at his command,” he added.

Advertisement

Trump’s unusual move to deploy the National Guard, characteristic of his aggressive and unprecedented use of executive power, was based on his administration’s stated assessment that the Chicago area was descending into lawless chaos.

That view of protests against surging immigration enforcement actions in Chicago is rejected by local officials as well as judges who have ruled against the administration.

The deployment was challenged in court by the Democratic-led state of Illinois and the city of Chicago, with their lawyers saying Trump had an ulterior motive for the deployment: to punish his political opponents.

They argued in court papers that Trump’s invocation of the federal law was not justified and that his actions also violated the Constitution’s 10th Amendment, which places limits on federal power, as well as the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally bars the military from conducting law enforcement duties.

U.S. District Judge April Perry said she “found no credible evidence that there is a danger of rebellion” and issued a temporary restraining order in favor of the state.

Advertisement

The Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals largely reached the same conclusion, saying “the facts do not justify the president’s actions.”

The court did narrow Perry’s order, saying that Trump could federalize the troops, but could not deploy them.

The Supreme Court has frequently ruled in Trump’s favor in recent months as the administration has rushed to the justices when policies are blocked by lower courts.

Trump’s efforts to impose federal control over cities led by Democrats who vociferously oppose his presidency are not just limited to Chicago. He has also sought to deploy the National Guard in the District of Columbia, Los Angeles and Portland, Oregon.

Most recently, hundreds of National Guard troops deployed in Illinois and Oregon were set to return to their home states.

Advertisement

The deployment in the District of Columbia, which is a federal enclave with less local control, has been challenged in court, but there has been no ruling yet.

A federal appeals court allowed the Los Angeles deployment, and a different panel of judges on Oct. 20 ruled similarly in relation to Portland.



Source link

Illinois

Giant Illinois interstate sign collapses after truck strike, ‘major delays’ expected

Published

on

Giant Illinois interstate sign collapses after truck strike, ‘major delays’ expected


A busy stretch of I-64 in Illinois near St. Louis remains closed after a truck hit an overhead sign Wednesday night, with shocking photos showing beams of metal collapsed on the roadway.

The Illinois Department of Transportation posted about the closure, in St. Clair County, just before 8 a.m. Thursday.

“Heads up, Metro East travelers! Westbound I-64 approaching I-255 is currently closed due to a truck that hit a sign trust overnight,” IDOT said in a Facebook post. “Our crews are on it, working hard to get things cleared up and the road reopened ASAP. Expect major delays this morning, so if you can, try to steer clear of the area.”

According to the Illinois State Police, about 10:50 p.m., truck tractor semi trailer was in the construction zone on I-64 near Washington Park when it failed to lower its dump bed and struck the overhead road sign.

Advertisement

The structure holding the sign then failed and fell onto the roadway, ISP said. No injuries were reported.

Photos shared by IDOT showed the damage, with two giant green road signs over the interstate nearly touching the road, with the metal structure crushed and folded.

As of Thursday morning, all four westbound lanes remained closed due to the damage. Cleanup was expected to last for hours, with traffic diverted to IL 157, ISP said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Illinois

Capitol News Illinois | Illinois lawmakers begin days of deep dives on data centers

Published

on

Capitol News Illinois | Illinois lawmakers begin days of deep dives on data centers







Advertisement

Environmental advocates rally for greater data center regulation in Illinois at the Capitol on Wednesday. 




SPRINGFIELD — Illinois lawmakers are digging deep on data centers, with a House committee hearing from mayors, labor groups and agriculture representatives about the facilities’ local impacts in the first of three planned meetings.

Advertisement

Rep. Ann Williams, D-Chicago, the chair of the House Executive Committee, said she wanted to hear about the benefits and challenges of data centers as the General Assembly considers regulations like the POWER Act.

“Whatever we do here, we have to put people first,” she said Wednesday. “We have to put communities first. Data’s important, business is important, revenues are important, but people must come first.”

Water use, energy use, noise and how community benefit agreements are constructed were the primary concerns lawmakers wanted to address on Wednesday.

Generally, the speakers acknowledged data centers are part of a growing economy and are needed to support technology like AI, cloud computing and data storage used by various industries, from education to health care.

Some cautioned against regulation, saying it could dissuade companies from investing in Illinois while others aired different concerns they’ve encountered.

Advertisement

An Illinois Senate committee has two data center-related hearings scheduled for later this week as well. Environmental advocates on Wednesday also lobbied in the Capitol for data center regulation.

Local government perspective

Mayors from Aurora and DeKalb offered competing views of the benefits and tradeoffs data centers bring. DeKalb Mayor Cohen Barnes praised the Meta data center that started construction in 2020 and was finished in 2023.

“When Meta first came to our community, they specifically said they want to make a significant impact in everything they do where they have a physical presence, and that’s just what they did,” Barnes said.

Meta, he said, has invested heavily in DeKalb by contributing to the nonprofit community and paying tens of millions of dollars in property and utility taxes, helping to fund schools and local police. It has also partnered with Northern Illinois University to bring STEM classes to area high schools.

According to the Rockford Register Star, the Meta facility’s 2024 tax bill was $32.1 million, or 11 percent of the total $287.3 million in taxes generated in all of DeKalb County.

Advertisement

Barnes said DeKalb didn’t require Meta to meet any standards or requirements before construction began, and he said he worries that requirements might drive further development away.

“I would encourage you, let’s always think about how can we foster more economic development rather than inhibiting it with regulation and rules and requirements. And if we do that, then we do it for every industry in the state of Illinois,” he said.

Aurora Mayor John Laesch, on the other hand, said residents have raised concerns about noise from data centers and the impact on the power grid.

“Residents living near data centers have described a constant low frequency hum day and night,” he said. “It’s not loud in a traditional sense, but persistent. People have described trouble sleeping, increased stress, loss of quiet in their own homes.”

Aurora currently has five data centers in operation and five more under construction.

Advertisement

In March, Aurora enacted ordinances that would require data center developers to conduct and submit studies dealing with noise, water consumption and energy needs. The ordinances also require future data centers to meet standards for noise, vibrations, water use and energy use. They will also need to get power from renewable energy sources.

Laesch said while the city has tried to address the issues locally, he urged the state to take broader action.

“Water and energy in particular, need to be addressed regionally or at the state level,” he said.

Those requirements mimic provisions in the POWER Act, a major data center regulation bill now under consideration in both chambers of the General Assembly.

Sangamon County on Tuesday approved the zoning proposal for a CyrusOne data center project, and Marc Ayers, a former member of the Sangamon County Board who resigned after Tuesday’s vote, said residents also aired worries about noise and water at those meetings.

Advertisement

Ayers, who voted against the proposal, said he was happy to see the $500 million investment in Sangamon County, but he wanted to have more discussions before approving the project.

He said he also wanted more information from companies about their hiring practices for construction and for long-term operations. And he wanted transparency about a community benefit agreement between the data center and a local development group, especially considering the company also owns the data centers in Aurora.

“Rather than fixing the noise in Aurora, they’re expanding with a bigger project in Sangamon County,” he said. “So this aspect of being a good neighbor, we’re torn with that because they’re not really being a good neighbor right now in Aurora.”

Labor perspective

Representatives from labor were generally opposed to regulations. They said too many rules would risk companies choosing to do business elsewhere.

“The fact of the matter is data centers are going to be built. They are being built. The question is whether Illinois is ready to build them here,” said Marc Poulos, the executive director of Indiana, Illinois, Iowa Foundation for Fair Contracting and a member of Local 150.

Advertisement

Poulos said there’s high demand for labor to work on these long-term construction projects in surrounding states, including hundreds of his own members. Without “smart standards,” he said, Illinois could lose out on that investment.

Joe Duffy with Climate Jobs Illinois, said finding a line between economic development and environmental protections should be the priority, but pausing perks like the data center tax credits — as Gov. J.B. Pritzker has proposed — is the wrong approach.

“We believe Illinois can maintain its lead in this race with the right balance of incentives, labor standards, local protections and infrastructure planning,” Duffy said. “We can attract investment while ensuring communities benefit workers are treated fairly, and our energy and water resources are responsibly managed.”

Land use

Farmers are most concerned about how data centers use land and water, said Bill Bodine of the Illinois Farm Bureau.

He said farmers support “bring your own energy” proposals but want reassurance that new renewable energy sources aren’t developed on land that could be used for farming.

Advertisement

“Those proposals should prioritize projects that place renewable energy on, say, center rooftops, parking areas, land already impacted by data center development,” he said.

He also called for water use reports and water withdrawal plans that are reviewed by the Illinois State Water Survey as well as efficiency standards for energy and water use.

Bodine said farmers are also concerned about data centers being abandoned if their technology becomes obsolete, or they reach the end of their lifespan. He asked for a decommissioning plan or process so the facilities could be removed easily.

“We don’t want it to turn into a dangerous situation or an eyesore,” he said.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

District 87 Superintendent Honored by Illinois Association

Published

on

District 87 Superintendent Honored by Illinois Association


Enter your email and we’ll send a secure one-click link to sign in.

CIProud.com is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

Advertisement

CIProud.com is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending