Connect with us

Illinois

7th Circuit Affirms Dismissal of GOP Challenge to Illinois’ Mail-in Ballot Receipt Deadline

Published

on

7th Circuit Affirms Dismissal of GOP Challenge to Illinois’ Mail-in Ballot Receipt Deadline


Image of a mail-in ballot. (Adobe Stock)

As a result of a decision from the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Illinois election officials can continue to count mail-in ballots for up to two weeks after an election so long as they are postmarked or certified by Election Day. 

The 7th Circuit’s ruling affirms a Trump-appointed judge’s previous dismissal of a lawsuit from GOP Congressman Michael Bost and Republican voters who sought to invalidate Illinois’ post-election ballot receipt deadline.

“Because Plaintiffs have not alleged an adequate injury, we agree that they lack standing to bring this suit and affirm the district court’s dismissal of the case on jurisdictional grounds,” the 7th Circuit’s decision states. Judge John Lee, a Biden appointee, authored the ruling.

Today’s rejection of Bost’s suit comes as the Republican National Committee (RNC) and the Trump campaign are currently litigating similar challenges to mail-in ballot receipt deadlines in Mississippi and Nevada, both of which were rejected by district courts in recent weeks and are now on appeal.

Advertisement

Since the beginning of this year, Republicans and conservative groups have lost a total of four lawsuits challenging mail-in ballot receipt deadlines.

Aside from Illinois, approximately 20 other states and U.S. territories have post-election ballot receipt deadlines, which ensure that voters are not disenfranchised due to postal delays beyond their control. 

Bost predicated his legal challenge on the notion that Illinois’ 14-day mail-in ballot receipt deadline effectively “expands” Election Day in violation of the U.S. Constitution and federal law, which requires states to hold Election Day on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November.

Bost and his Republican co-plaintiffs — who were represented by the right-wing legal group Judicial Watch — also alleged that the two-week receipt deadline for mail-in ballots burdens their right to vote by allowing “illegal ballots” to “dilute the value of timely ballots cast and received on or before Election Day.”

The RNC and Trump campaign’s ongoing lawsuits in Mississippi and Nevada put forth largely similar arguments, which have fallen flat even among Republican-appointed judges.

Advertisement

While all three 7th Circuit judges in today’s ruling agreed that the plaintiffs cannot adequately demonstrate that their votes are “diluted” by the state’s deadline, Judge Michael Scudder — a Trump appointee — dissented in part after concluding that Bost, as a congressional candidate, has standing.

In particular, Scudder wrote that the state’s ballot receipt deadline “will increase Bost’s campaign costs this November—a fact that gives Bost a concrete stake in the resolution of this lawsuit.”

In February, a Trump-appointed federal judge dismissed a lawsuit brought by the right-wing Public Interest Legal Foundation challenging North Dakota’s mail-in ballot receipt deadline, which allows for the counting of mail-in ballots up to 13 days after Election Day. 

In the Illinois, Mississippi and North Dakota cases, the U.S. Department of Justice chimed in to underscore the importance of post-Election Day mail-in ballot deadlines for military and overseas voters, who often face logistical challenges with transporting ballots from distant locations. 

The Democratic Party of Illinois highlighted in an amicus brief how the state’s receipt deadline “guards against the disenfranchisement of all qualified voters, including Bost’s constituents and supporters.” 

Advertisement

Read the ruling here.

Learn more about the case here.



Source link

Advertisement

Illinois

Missed the lunar eclipse? See when the next one will be over Illinois

Published

on

Missed the lunar eclipse? See when the next one will be over Illinois


play

Millions across the United States who woke up early Tuesday were treated to a “blood moon,” the only total lunar eclipse occurring in North America in 2026, according to NASA.

Advertisement

Illinois residents who missed it will be waiting some time for the next total lunar eclipse to shine above the U.S. — several years, in fact. But a partial lunar eclipse is coming sooner.

When is the next total lunar eclipse in Illinois?

After March 3, Illinois’ next visible total lunar eclipse won’t happen again until June 2029, writes Time and Date. There is a partial lunar eclipse coming sooner, however.

Others are reading: Free Full Moon Queso at Qdoba. How to get in Illinois

When is the next lunar eclipse?

A partial lunar eclipse will be visible in Illinois on Aug. 27-28, shining over the Americas, Europe, Africa and parts of Asia, according to NASA.

Provided you’re willing to stay up late to see it, the partial lunar eclipse will be at its maximum around 11:12 p.m., Thursday, Aug. 27, in Illinois.

Advertisement

Until then, here’s what people in parts of the U.S. were seeing Tuesday morning.

See photos of the March 3 total lunar eclipse

Calendar of upcoming eclipses

When is the next solar eclipse?

The next solar eclipse will be visible to roughly 980 million people on Aug. 12, 2026, writes Time and Date.

A total solar eclipse will occur over Greenland, Iceland, Spain, Russia and a small area of Portugal, while a partial eclipse will be visible in Europe, Africa, North America, the Atlantic Ocean, Arctic Ocean and Pacific Ocean, NASA reports.

Advertisement

Need help finding stars, planets and constellations? Try these free astronomy apps

The following free astronomy apps can help you locate stars, planets, and constellations.



Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

Illinois lawmakers consider tightening DUI law to 0.05 BAC

Published

on

Illinois lawmakers consider tightening DUI law to 0.05 BAC


COLLINSVILLE, Ill. (First Alert 4) – Right now, in Illinois, Missouri and most of the country, drivers must be at or over 0.08 to get a DUI. A proposal in the Illinois Statehouse would lower that threshold.

“Make it as safe as you possibly can out there,” said John Sapolis.

Collinsville resident John Sapolis said while lowering Illinois’ DUI threshold would not affect him, as he rarely drinks, he likes the idea of getting drinkers off the road.

“It’s bad enough out there driving around with people who are not drinking,” said Sapolis.

Advertisement

If a bill passes in the Illinois House of Representatives, the blood alcohol limit would be lowered, meaning fewer drinks could put somebody over the line for a DUI.

Two Chicago-area lawmakers propose lowering the threshold from 0.08 to 0.05.

“Your body still is not in a proper state to really be behind the wheel,” said Erin Doherty, Regional Executive Director for Mothers Against Drunk Driving.

Doherty said even at 0.05, drivers are less coordinated and cannot track moving objects as well as when they are sober.

Utah is the only state in the country to have the 0.05 limit, and Doherty said one in five drivers there changed their behavior.

Advertisement

“There are so many other options before getting behind the wheel,” said Doherty.

Sara Floyd used to live in Utah and now calls Collinsville home.

“The Midwest people like to have a few beers while they watch their Little League games

“In Utah, you can barely get alcohol at a gas station,” said Floyd.

She said the culture in Utah is very different and thinks there should be some wiggle room for drivers.

Advertisement

“If one person had a beer within an hour period and then drove, they shouldn’t get a DUI for one drink,” said Floyd.

Doherty said they do not recommend driving even after a single drink.

“You really should not get behind the wheel when you’re any kind of impaired, one drink, five drinks, whatever that looks like, just don’t drive,” said Doherty.

While each body processes alcohol differently, according to the National Library of Medicine, in a two-hour period it takes a 170-pound man three to four drinks to reach 0.05, and it takes a 137-pound woman two to three drinks to reach the same state.

April Sage said she does not think this law would work, saying instead it would help more if the state added more public transit.

Advertisement

“I could have three beers and get a ride home safely,” said Sage.

First Alert 4 reached out to a spokesman for the Illinois Department of Transportation to see if they had any comments on this bill. The spokesperson said they are not going to comment because it is pending legislation.

According to the Illinois Department of Public Health, fatal crashes involving one driver who had been drinking increased 4% from 2019 to 2022, despite multiple studies showing fewer Americans are drinking.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Illinois

Voters had no choice in nearly 9-in-10 primary elections

Published

on

Voters had no choice in nearly 9-in-10 primary elections



Illinois voting data shows voters had no choice of candidate in nearly 9-in-10 Democratic and Republican primaries for state and federal office in 2024.

Voters had no choice of candidate in nearly nine out of every 10 Republican and Democratic primary elections for state and federal office in 2024.

Analysis of Illinois voting data shows Democrats ran one or no candidate in 135 of the 155 primary elections for the U.S. House, Illinois Senate and Illinois House. That left voters with a choice between candidates in just 20 races.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Republicans only ran one or no candidate in 137 of the 155 primary elections last year for non-judicial state and federal positions, giving voters of a choice in just 18 races.

In total, there were 155 primaries for the U.S. House of Representatives, Illinois Senate and Illinois House in 2024. Democrats did not run a candidate in 28 of these races while Republicans failed to run a candidate in 50.

And in the 107 Democratic primaries and 87 Republican primaries were only one candidate ran for the position, those candidates secured their spot on the general election ballot with a single primary vote.

To get on the primary ballot for Illinois Senate, the Illinois General Assembly mandates established party candidates to get 1,000 petition signatures from district party members. Illinois House candidates need 500 signatures. For U.S. House, either party’s candidates need signatures from 0.5% of all primary voters from their party in the district.

Advertisement

This lack of choice between candidates for Democratic and Republican party primaries also left general election voters with fewer choices on the ballot.

In the 2024 election cycle, 65 of the 155 non-judicial state and federal general elections had only one candidate on the ballot. That means in 65 districts, it only took one vote for a candidate to win a seat representing the entire district.

Illinoisans already suffer from a lack of choice in candidates. Research shows an average of 4.7 million Illinois voters had no choice in their state representative between the 2012 and 2020 election cycles.

Research shows more choice drives voter participation and makes legislators less susceptible to the influence of lobbyists and special interests. Lightly contested elections also tend to skew policies in favor of powerful special interests.

Illinois should consider reforms that will give voters more choices at the ballot box, such as making it easier for independents to enter the general election like they do in Iowa, Wisconsin and Tennessee.

Advertisement

Until that happens, Illinoisans will continue to see elections with too few choices and too much influence handed to those already in power.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending