Connect with us

Lifestyle

‘Kony 2012,’ 10 Years Later

Published

on

‘Kony 2012,’ 10 Years Later

Initially of 2012, a lot of the world had by no means heard of Joseph Kony, a Central African warlord accountable, by UNICEF’s rely, for abducting tens of 1000’s of kids to enslave them and use them as troopers, and for displacing greater than 2.5 million folks all through the area.

However that may change on March 5. Jason Russell, a founding father of the nonprofit Invisible Youngsters, had directed a movie known as “Kony 2012” that was meant to reveal a violent disaster.

“We felt if folks within the Western world knew about this atrocity, it’d cease in days,” Mr. Russell, 43, stated in a cellphone interview.

Within the video, launched on YouTube by Invisible Youngsters, Mr. Russell explains the battle in easy phrases suited to his 5-year-old son, Gavin, who seems within the video alongside inspirational photos of defiant Ugandan youngsters and activists in North America. On the finish, Mr. Russell points a name to motion: for celebrities, policymakers and anybody else watching to assist make Joseph Kony a family title.

When Oprah Winfrey tweeted “Kony 2012,” its views rose from 66,000 to 9 million, in response to Gilad Lotan, an information scientist who compiled a visible evaluation of its unfold. Justin Bieber, Rihanna and Kim Kardashian shared it, too. Inside every week, the video had hit 100 million — a report on YouTube on the time — and Mr. Kony had turn into the goal of a world civilian manhunt.

Advertisement

Ten years on, Mr. Kony stays at massive, Gavin has began highschool, and Mr. Russell remains to be grappling with the combined legacy of “Kony 2012.” At a time when a continuing stream of movies on TikTok, Instagram and Twitter is illustrating the real-time destruction of Ukrainian cities by Russian forces, the movie reads as each a relic of what specialists have described as a techno-optimistic post-Arab Spring digital panorama and a precursor to an period of seemingly countless footage of violence and battle on social media.

Invisible Youngsters, which was based in 2004 by Mr. Russell, Bobby Bailey and Laren Poole, had screened movies about Mr. Kony and his insurgent group, the Lord’s Resistance Military, at occasions across the nation, reaching a complete of 5 million viewers, in response to Mr. Russell. “Kony 2012,” he stated, was “the primary time we aggressively went after social media.”

In his evaluation of the video’s unfold, Mr. Lotan, the information scientist, famous dense clusters of exercise in Dayton, Ohio, and Birmingham, Ala., two cities the place Invisible Youngsters had stopped on tour.

The unfold of the movie on the web opened the group as much as every kind of critiques. Folks on-line debated the movie’s racial politics, the ethics of humanitarianism and the utility of “slacktivism,” the equation of likes and shares with motion.

“The highest criticism that I’ve examine through the years is the oversimplification of a posh subject,” Mr. Russell stated. “To that I’d say, ‘I hear you, however to make one thing go viral’ — our purpose was to simplify a posh subject — ‘that’s what it’s important to do.’ In a way it’s meant as a criticism, however I noticed it as a praise.”

Advertisement

On the time, the eye the movie acquired turned overwhelming for Mr. Russell, who was filmed strolling bare round his neighborhood, yelling obscenities simply over every week after its launch. “There are only a few examples of people that have been publicly shamed and put beneath that white-hot mild that don’t have some sort of breakdown,” he stated.

The footage was bought to TMZ, in response to Mr. Russell, and #Horny2012 overtook #Kony2012 in trending hashtags on Twitter, as inaccurate stories surfaced that he had been masturbating in public. What started as an earnest try at consciousness elevating had turn into a meme.

However the movie clearly struck a chord with viewers, tapping into what Jonah Berger, a advertising and marketing professor on the Wharton Faculty of the College of Pennsylvania and the creator of “Contagious: Why Issues Catch On,” refers to as STEPPS: social forex, triggers, emotion, public sensible worth and story. These elements attraction to our psychological make-up and primary human motivations, Professor Berger stated.

Eric Meyerson, the previous head of companion advertising and marketing at YouTube, stated that, on the time, “Kony 2012” leaned on the emotional qualities of the web’s most resonant movies. Its first three minutes embody footage of the Arab Spring and a toddler driving his bike for the primary time.

“They had been the movies that we at YouTube had been attempting to advertise on the time, to submit for Webbys, the sorts of movies that may encourage good emotions, that are what convey folks again to a platform,” Mr. Meyerson stated. He added that in some circumstances viewers had been left with the sensation that by consuming and sharing content material, “they had been serving to to alter the world.”

Advertisement

When Mr. Meyerson joined Fb in 2015 to guide its video advertising and marketing staff, that earnest sense of chance nonetheless stood. However after the introduction of Fb Dwell in August, the temper shifted, as graphic live-streamed footage began to seem.

“Then we had the rise of faux information, Brexit, Trump’s election,” he stated, “and rapidly, by the tip of 2016, it went from ‘social media can change the world for the higher’ to ‘Fb and YouTube and Twitter are destroying democracy.’” The conversations that quickly adopted had been targeted on algorithms, echo chambers and “post-truth” politics.

“The early 2010s was extremely pivotal in altering our present info setting, and it doesn’t get the eye it deserves,” Mr. Meyerson stated.

Now, the earliest photos of battle and disaster usually come to us by means of social media, and are knowledgeable by the platforms the place they’re shared. “The appearance of digital conflict has challenged the mainstream media and different elite actors of their capability to form what conflict appears like,” stated Andrew Hoskins, an interdisciplinary analysis professor on the College of Glasgow.

“Taking a look at Twitter proper now may be very attention-grabbing,” he stated, referring to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which has been known as the primary TikTok conflict. The immense quantity of “footage that floods our consciousness of battle,” he stated — open-source intelligence, citizen journalism on TikTok — “may revolutionize conflict, however it may make no distinction in any respect.”

Advertisement

In 2017, the USA and Uganda scaled again a mission to seize Mr. Kony, stating that he not represented a regional risk. “Atrocities dedicated by the L.R.A. have been diminished by 80 %,” Samuel Enosa Peni, the archbishop of the Western Equatoria State, wrote in an e-mail. (He has misplaced three siblings to the military.)

As we speak, Invisible Youngsters is targeted solely on native applications in Central Africa. Social media performs a minor position in its technique.

Mr. Russell has additionally dialed again his digital presence. “Whereas we now have the media literacy to debunk issues like QAnon theories,” he stated, “I can’t assist that the web nonetheless type of triggers me.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Lifestyle

The jury's in: You won't miss anything watching this movie from the couch

Published

on

The jury's in: You won't miss anything watching this movie from the couch

Nicholas Hoult (front row, center) plays Justin Kemp in Juror #2.

Warner Bros.


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Warner Bros.

There’s been a bit of consternation flying around about the fact that the theatrical release of Juror #2, directed by Clint Eastwood, was very muted. (It’s now on Max.) It has struck some people, particularly some Eastwood fans, as unfair to give short shrift to the 94-year-old director’s latest work.

But this is a movie that is perfect to watch at home. It belongs at home.

(Some mild early-plot spoilers follow, but they are not important to your enjoyment of the movie.)

Advertisement

The film has a terrific premise: Justin (Nicholas Hoult) gets called for jury duty, which he’s not excited about, since his wife is extremely pregnant and he’d rather just get out of it. But he can’t, and he ends up serving on a case where a man (Gabriel Basso) is accused of beating his girlfriend to death and leaving her by the side of the road after they had a drunken fight at a bar. But Justin quickly realizes that he was at the bar that night, and while he didn’t drink, he was upset. When he left, he took his eyes off the road and hit a deer — or so he thought. Now he wonders: Might he actually have hit this woman himself? And what is he supposed to do now?

The maneuvering that has to happen to make this even mildly plausible is impressive in its precision: He is a recovering alcoholic who went to a bar but didn’t drink, but his sponsor (Kiefer Sutherland) assures him that nobody will believe he was sober and he will rot in jail if he tells the truth. There are both a giant deer-crossing sign and a bridge at the exact point where the incident happened, so that when, in flashbacks, Justin gets out of the car to find out what he hit, he sees the sign, but might just miss the woman’s body, because it may have flown over the side of the bridge.

The legal plot, too, has so many holes in it that it’s more holes than plot itself. As the prosecutor (Toni Collette) prepares to bring the case, nobody thinks that maybe this woman found by the side of the road who left a bar in the dark in the rain was hit by a car, rather than beaten to death with a weapon — of which there’s no sign? (The case against the defendant, her boyfriend, amounts to “we don’t know what happened to her, so she was probably, what? Beaten to death? And it was probably you, since we don’t know anybody else who would have done it.”) Justin’s sponsor (who’s a lawyer!) doesn’t point out that it’s still entirely possible he did hit a deer, given that sign, and that proving otherwise would be a very tall order, especially after they put somebody else on trial?

Suffice it to say that this is a classic hum-through plot, meaning you have to hum loudly to yourself at the silly parts so that you don’t notice how silly they are. But that’s OK! That’s true of many perfectly serviceable courtroom dramas, which is what this is. I miss serviceable courtroom dramas. There should be more of them. And I’ve got nothing against this one, particularly. Clint Eastwood is an experienced and knowledgeable director; you’re not going to suddenly get a bad product. It’s fine!

But the serviceable courtroom drama is a genre that’s well-suited to being watched at home. They could have made this a mid-level Max streaming series, to be honest, dragging it out to six episodes or so, and that would have been fine, too. (Might have given J.K. Simmons, who has a strangely abbreviated role as a fellow juror, more to do.)

Advertisement

It would certainly be nice to see a healthier theater environment, where courtroom dramas could become hits like they could in the olden days (A Few Good Men was the tenth highest-grossing movie of 1993!) The same could be said of sports movies, romantic comedies, adult dramas – I mean, the rest of the domestic top ten of 1993 includes Jurassic Park, The Fugitive, The Firm, Sleepless in Seattle, Mrs. Doubtfire, Indecent Proposal, In the Line of Fire, Aladdin and Cliffhanger. This year’s domestic top 10 (thus far) is nine sequels and Wicked. That’s a bummer.

But that’s happening across the board. Clint Eastwood was not singled out for disrespect; the couch is just where people see regular movies now. And if viewing is going to shift toward home, this film, which is thoroughly and entirely OK, belongs there as much as any.

This piece also appeared in NPR’s Pop Culture Happy Hour newsletter. Sign up for the newsletter so you don’t miss the next one, plus get weekly recommendations about what’s making us happy.

Listen to Pop Culture Happy Hour on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

No turf wars, no sexism: Meet the queer Gen Z women giving billiards a rebrand in L.A.

Published

on

No turf wars, no sexism: Meet the queer Gen Z women giving billiards a rebrand in L.A.

In the summer of 2023, Alix Max, new to town with a cigarette in their mouth, was shooting pool on the patio of 4100 Bar in Silver Lake. They were pretty good, too — good enough to catch the eye of two regulars, Andrea Lorell and Julianne Fox, who recruited them to join their practice group. Their proposal was simple: “We have this group chat, and we play together and get better. The goal is to beat men at pool.”

It’s a plotline that could be lifted from the classic billiards film “The Hustler: an up-and-coming pool prodigy, James Dean-cool, comes to town and gets seduced by the green-felted world of dive bar pool — an aspiring pool shark meet-cute over an ashtray. A cherished motto Max introduced to the group: “Pool is blue-collar golf.”

The pool night was born after Andrea Lorell, pictured, and other players kept experiencing hostility around the sport at other bars.

(Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

The pool-playing group, which started as a group chat titled “Women in STEM,” was composed of pool amateurs, usually young women Julianne “drunkenly met” at 4100 Bar who had a burgeoning interest in pool. Soon, the group chat mutated into a tournament series and community titled “Please Be Nice.” If billiards has the reputation of being a pastime for gamblers, hustlers and hanger-oners, the female-centric biweekly pool tournament at 4100 Bar offers a friendly, supportive alternative. “I don’t know if the goal necessarily was to build community, but it was a natural byproduct,” says Fox. The tournament is both a party and competition where women practice pool, trade tips and compete in an encouraging environment. It was created as an antidote to the prickly, male-dominated world of dive bar pool — all the exhilaration without the bickering turf wars with bar regulars.

 Julianne Fox tallies the score for the "Please Be Nice to Me,"

Julianne Fox tallies the score.

(Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times)

The founders, Lorell and Fox, began shooting pool at 4100 Bar in April 2023 and were bonded by their mutual hunger for the game. Growing up as an only child, Lorell spent hours playing on her aunt’s pool table. As an adult, she traveled across the country for work, always seeking out pool halls to “find a good hang.” She’s since joined a league and even played in a tournament in Las Vegas, where her team won the Sportsmanship Award. The team that knocked her out was disqualified in the next round. On the patio, she details the melodrama so amusingly that her love for the game is infectious — almost romantic.

The infamous Silverlake Gen-Z TikTok bar 4100 hosts a queer, female-forward pool tournament on Tuesday nights

“It’s a community cheering for each other and seeing each other get good,” says co-founder Andrea Lorell.

(Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

Until recently, Lorell lived in a cluttered studio apartment with a pool table beside her bed. She jokes being a pool shark is her dream job. “I give myself a little pep talk before important matches: ‘You’re the greatest pool player in the world,’” she says, laughing with a cigarette in hand. For her, the intention of “Please Be Nice” is to make pool accessible to young women: “It’s a community cheering for each other and seeing each other get good. It expedites people’s learning.”

Julianne Fox, a co-founder, says the tournament also operates as a workshop: “If you’ve never shot a pool ball before, come through. We’ll metaphorically or literally hold your hand.” It’s not about showing up the boys, even if that still happens. “I think it’s even more fun to learn the game to play with your girls,” says Fox. “I want to win, but I also want my opponent to have fun,” she adds, emphasizing the competition’s good-natured energy.

Pool tables in Los Angeles can be hostile places. “I’ll walk into a random bar in Koreatown, and there’s a pool table, and a bunch of older men are playing. You walk in, and they assume you’ll be bad at it,” says Max.

Adds Lorell, “They’re either giving you tips or checking you out, so it’s uncomfortable.”

Advertisement
trhe infamous Silverlake Gen-Z TikTok bar 4100 hosts a queer, female-forward pool tournament on Tuesday nights

Players say there’s a good-natured energy at “Please Be Nice” tournaments.

(Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times)

Molly Sievert, another “Please Be Nice” player, has also experienced sexism while playing pool. She explains that people assume her interest in pool stems from wanting to impress a father or boyfriend. She began shooting pool at 21 in bars across cities and is still baffled by men’s casual condescension toward female pool players. ”Men have never complimented me on my defensive shots because they think it’s an accident,” she says. When they inevitably lose to Sievert, they toss it up to a bad beat rather than their opponent’s skillset. She won her first tournament at “Please Be Nice” and has been a frequent competitor ever since. She’s a proud critic of 4100 Bar regulars — she says people keep walking into her cue stick, throwing off her shots, and not apologizing. “I always have that little part of me that is like, would you do that to a man?”

Sievert explains a personal theory that women take naturally to pool. Above all, it’s a game of brokering one’s circumstances, calling one’s shot, and making one’s own luck. It’s the type of hazards and presentiment that feel inherent to womanhood. Bravado, Molly argues, doesn’t serve the game. “Men will say, ‘I can make shots. I’m a shot maker.’ Many women are like, ‘I like the side pockets and weird angles. I don’t like the long table shots. I don’t like hitting it real. I like to think about the interaction of all the balls.”

April Clark, a comedian and pool player, chalks up antagonism at pool tables in L.A. to a scarcity issue. “When I first got sucked into playing pool, I was living in New York City; there were so many bars with pool tables.” For Clark, the game’s appeal is the spontaneous encounters with strangers that pool invites. The fewer the tables, the worse the ecosystem, the worse the vibe, Clark argues.

Advertisement
 Jaden Levinson, left and Taylor Garcia watch the action in the Please Be Nice to Me pool tournament

Jaden Levinson, left, and Taylor Garcia watch the action.

(Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times)

It is often remarked that pool halls look like morgues; the dimly lit blue-felted table inside 4100 Bar is no exception. The competitors are in a trancelike state, building a stratagem. The pool tournaments often run till the bar closes at 2 a.m. The players take breaks to socialize, buy drinks and watch each other play.

Part of the success of “Please Be Nice” is tied to the recent renaissance of 4100 Bar, which transformed from a neighborhood dive into a Silver Lake nightlife institution thanks to TikTok. Mouse, a bartender at 4100 Bar for eight years, explains the bar’s rise began in 2020 when it became a popular spot for outdoor drinking during COVID restrictions.

The infamous Silverlake Gen-Z TikTok bar 4100 hosts a queer, female-forward pool tournament

Participants of all levels are welcome — even those who’ve never shot a pool ball before.

(Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

Now, it’s not unusual to have a run-in with a celebrity at 4100 Bar on a weekend with its new reputation as a charmingly sleazy playground for the internet-famous. Due to TikTok, the bar gained a cult following in Europe and Japan, with tourists flocking to the bar to be photographed in front of the avocado-green wall, Mouse explains. “Foreigners come here just to take photos with the 4100 sign and won’t even order,” he says. “People come and spend 100 bucks on the photo booth and not even get a drink.” The wall, he notes, closely resembled the now-infamous shade of neon green from Charli XCX’s “Brat” album.

For Lorell, the dive bar exists as a third space. “If you spend four out of seven days seeing the same people, you’re not just bar friends on that point; you’re chosen family.”

Diana Brennan sizes up the playing field while participating in the "Please Be Nice to Me" pool tournament at bar 4100.

Diana Brennan sizes up the playing field.

(Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

Rumors swirl that 4100 Bar might close in the coming year with the expansion of Erewhon. “Over my dead body,” Fox exclaims.

For the future of “Please Be Nice,” Lorell and Fox hope the pool-loving community develops even further. “We would love to solidify a beginner-centric event since that’s where this all started, learning pool with women and nonbinary people who were too scared to try it at a normal bar,” says Fox. “We hope to continue to train up the troops and run every single table in L.A.,” she adds with a smirk.

There’s a beloved pool adage from “The Hustler,” spoken by the protagonist, Fast Eddie Felson: “Even if you beat me, I’m still the best.” Fox thinks the quote doesn’t align with her attitude toward pool. “There’s something Andrea says all the time when someone beats her, she says: ‘I don’t lose to losers. So you better win the whole thing.’”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Is “The Godfather: Part II,” the perfect sequel? : Consider This from NPR

Published

on

Is “The Godfather: Part II,” the perfect sequel? : Consider This from NPR

The “Kiss of Death” in “The Godfather: Part II”, directed by Francis Ford Coppola, based on the novel ‘The Godfather’ by Mario Puzo. Seen here from left, John Cazale (back to camera) as Fredo Corleone and Al Pacino as Don Michael Corleone.

Photo by CBS via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Photo by CBS via Getty Images


The “Kiss of Death” in “The Godfather: Part II”, directed by Francis Ford Coppola, based on the novel ‘The Godfather’ by Mario Puzo. Seen here from left, John Cazale (back to camera) as Fredo Corleone and Al Pacino as Don Michael Corleone.

Photo by CBS via Getty Images

Given the fact that it seems like Hollywood churns out nothing but sequels, you would think the industry would have perfected the genre by now.

Some sequels are pretty darn good, but many believe the perfect movie sequel came out 50 years ago this month.

Advertisement

Of course, we’re talking about Francis Ford Coppola’s The Godfather: Part II. It’s not only considered the greatest sequel of all time, it’s also considered one of the greatest movies of all time.

So why does Godfather II work, and where so many other sequels fall short?

NPR producer Marc Rivers weighs in.

For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.

Email us at considerthis@npr.org.

Advertisement

This episode was produced by Brianna Scott and Marc Rivers. It was edited by Courtney Dorning. Our executive producer is Sami Yenigun.

Continue Reading

Trending