Connect with us

Health

Menopause Facial Hair: Dermatologists Reveal the Best Ways To Remove It At Home

Published

on

Menopause Facial Hair: Dermatologists Reveal the Best Ways To Remove It At Home

What is as certain as death and taxes? Menopause. If you’re a woman over 40, it’s either creeping up on you or it’s already arrived. Along with it you’ve likely experienced symptoms like hot flashes, night sweats, vaginal and bladder problems, bone density loss and mood swings which can last months or even years. One of the more common, slightly less bothersome, but certainly unflattering symptoms of menopause, facial hair. In fact, one study found that 40% of women over 45 experience unwanted facial hair, especially on the chin.

But there’s hope, no matter what hairs have popped up, from added peach fuzz and chin strays to the dreaded menopause mustache. Read on for the easy ways to remove them all.

What causes menopause facial hair?

According to the National Institute of Aging, over a million women experience menopause annually, typically between the ages of 45 and 55. It usually lasts about seven years but can be as long as double that. Hot flashes are the most common symptom experienced by 75% of women due to rapidly decreasing estrogen levels. 

And while those changing hormone levels can cause many women to experience thinning hair on the head, it can also cause an increase in hair in other body parts, like the face.

“Hirsutism describes excess hair in areas of a woman’s body in a male-like pattern, like on the face, usually due to excess sex hormones like testosterone. Androgens usually cause fine, thin hairs in these areas to grow and become coarser and thicker,” explains Kseniya Kobets, MD, Director of Cosmetic Dermatology at Montefiore-Einstein Advanced Care in New York. 

Advertisement

“During perimenopause and menopause, women start to have reduced female hormones like estrogen, which used to balance out the male hormones like testosterone; the latter is not reduced in menopause,” Dr. Kobets adds. 

Even worse? “The hormonal imbalance can cause new hair to grow, or it can influence already existing thinner hairs to become darker and thicker on the face, chest, back and abdomen,” says Ryan Turner, MD, a dermatologist practicing in New York City. 

That means we’re not just dealing with peach fuzz but with dark, coarse hairs that stand out. The most common areas for these hairs to crop up are the upper lip and the chin, and they can even go as far as to mimic a beard and a mustache. This menopause facial hair can be extremely embarrassing and make us self-conscious in our daily life. (Click through to learn how spearmint tea can get rid of facial hair caused by PCOS.)

The best methods to remove menopause facial hair

Now that we know why it happens, what can we do about it? Dermatologists say several methods exist to keep you fuzz-free safely. 

The best method for removing strays 

If you’re like us, you waste precious time in front of the mirror trying to pluck that one stubble of hair that you know will be 6 inches long tomorrow if you don’t get it out today!

Advertisement

But all that picking and pulling can leave behind red marks and scabs, says Dr. Kobets. And odds are, there are more of those pesky strands waiting to pop out next. Waxing is one alternative—but ouch! Instead, opt for a method that easily targets individual hairs without ripping at or scratching your skin. 

What can work: Sugaring. A natural wax-like paste made of sugar, lemon juice and water gently extracts hairs at the root. Unlike plucking or waxing, which can pull on and inflame skin, the sugar paste only latches on to hairs — not sensitive skin, says hair-removal expert Shobha Tummala, of Shobha salons.

To do: In a saucepan, bring 2 cups of sugar, ¼  cup of lemon juice and ¼ cup of water to a boil. Let cool for 20 minutes, then pour into a glass jar. Use a clean Popsicle stick to apply the paste to areas prone to strays, spreading it in the opposite direction of growth. Let it harden, then quickly lift away in the direction of growth. 

Watch this video for a more in-depth how to:

Another option: An electric facial hair removal device like Flawless, (Buy from Amazon, $19.99). It’s painless, portable (the size of a lipstick) and its head is perfectly sized for navigating the small areas of the face, although it may not be powerful enough to combat super thick or coarse hairs. 

Advertisement

The best method for removing upper lip hair 

Through the years, we’ve tried harsh bleaches, waxing (ouch!) and even shaving to rid our upper lip of that masculine patch of hair. The problem? The older we get, the more sensitive skin becomes, and these methods end up replacing all that hair with a mustache of red, bumpy inflamed skin instead.

An easy at home option to removing this kind of menopause facial hair? Easy-to-apply and fast-acting creams use chemicals (like calcium thioglycolate) that work quickly to dissolve proteins in the hair so you can swipe both cream and hair right off less than 10 minutes after applying. And the newest options like Completely Bare ctrl+hair+DEL Facial Hair Removal Cream (Buy from Completely Bare, $11) come infused with ingredients like soothing aloe vera, moisturizing shea butter and protective vitamin E to counteract any of the inflammation that used to be common with depilatories and leave skin feeling smooth. 

The best method for removing peach fuzz

Zigres/Shutterstock

“Dermaplaning is a good option for the temporary treatment of facial hair, as it uses a scalpel or razor blade to remove hair and exfoliate the skin, which in turn helps smooth skin and reduce dullness. However, since a scalpel or razor blade is involved, there are some things to consider and be cognizant of,” advises Dr. Turner. 

There are two different methods of dermaplaning. The first is done in a licensed aesthetician or doctor’s office. “Wet dermaplaning is done using a surgical steel razor blade and is usually only performed by professionals. This method involves adding oil (like jojoba oil) to the skin to help the blade glide over the skin and is better for coarser hair,” explains Bankson. Professional dermaplaning can cost anywhere from $75 to $200, depending on where you live. The other method is doing it yourself at home using devices such as Dermaflash (Buy from Dermaflash, $199), which an aesthetician developed tool or the less expensive Venus’ facial razor (Buy from Amazon, $15.79).

“When it comes to dermaplaning at home, proceed with caution — and a deft hand — as it may cause skin irritation and possibly infection as tiny breaks in the skin may occur,” advises Dr. Turner. “It’s essential to use a new sterile blade for each treatment. Also, be careful around the eyebrows and crevices of the nose – navigating those areas with this tool can be difficult,” he adds. 

To do:

Advertisement
  1. Hold the device at a 45-degree angle and hold the skin taut with the other hand and gently glide the device across the cheek in short, feathery strokes to remove dead skin cells, debris, and other peach fuzz quickly and effectively. Continue until all hair is removed.
  2. Apply a soothing serum, face oil, balm, or cream to nourish or hydrate the skin immediately after dermaplaning. 

Click through to learn all about how to dermaplane at home.

Don’t want to remove menopause facial hair? Lighten them instead

At-home bleaching kits like those from Sally Hansen (Buy from Walgreens, $5.49) allow you to lighten the hairs instead of removing them, which can be a good option if you don’t mind the hairs staying there but being less visible. 

Like with depilatory creams, you could get a reaction from the bleach mixture and should do a patch test first to be safe. 


Looking for more ways to combat the annoying symptoms of menopause?

Check out our articles on the best menopause supplements, the best pajamas for menopause and the surprising impact of soy on hot flashes.


Jene Sena

Woman’s World aims to feature only the best products and services. We update when possible, but deals expire and prices can change. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission.

Questions? Reach us at shop@womansworld.com

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Health

Dance Your Way to Weight Loss: Burn Fat and Have Fun in 30 Minutes!

Published

on

Dance Your Way to Weight Loss: Burn Fat and Have Fun in 30 Minutes!


Advertisement


Dance Your Way to Weight Loss: Burn Fat and Have Fun in 30 Minutes! | Woman’s World




















Advertisement














Advertisement


Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.


Use escape to exit the menu.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Health

‘I’m a pediatrician: I get these top 11 questions about measles’

Published

on

‘I’m a pediatrician: I get these top 11 questions about measles’

As measles cases continue to spread throughout the U.S. — with 12 states reporting official outbreaks, according to the latest CDC data — concern is growing among high-risk groups.

Children under the age of 5 are most vulnerable to measles, health experts confirm.

The CDC recommends that children receive two doses of the MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccine, starting with the first dose at 12 to 15 months of age, and a second dose at 4 through 6 years of age. 

MEASLES OUTBREAKS EMERGE ACROSS US: SEE WHICH STATES HAVE REPORTED CASES

That means children under 5 may not have full protection.

Advertisement

As measles cases continue to spread throughout the U.S. — with 12 states reporting official outbreaks, according to the latest CDC data — concern is growing among high-risk groups. (iStock)

Allison Croucher, DO, a pediatrician and doctor of osteopathic medicine with Duly Health and Care in Illinois, said she frequently gets questions from concerned parents looking to protect their children from the highly contagious virus.

Chroucher shared some of the most common inquiries she receives, along with her responses.

1. Should I be worried about measles where I live or where I’m traveling to?

Measles cases have been reported in 20 states so far (according to the CDC): Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York City, New York State, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia and Washington.

Baby with measles

Children under the age of 5 are most vulnerable to measles, health experts confirm. (iStock)

Even if you do not live in one of those areas, keep a close eye on local health alerts, since the disease is rapidly evolving. 

Advertisement

Your state’s Department of Health website, which should end in “.gov,” is a great place to start. If you plan on traveling to an area with reported cases, be sure to seek guidance from your doctor beforehand.

2. How do I know if my child is fully vaccinated?

A child is considered fully vaccinated for measles if they have received two doses of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine at least four weeks apart. 

The first dose is typically given to children between 12 and 15 months old, followed by the second at four to six years.

Child at pediatrician

In the early stages, symptoms to watch out for include fever, cough, runny nose, and red, irritated eyes.  (iStock)

3. Can my infant get the vaccine early? 

In certain cases, yes. Infants who are high-risk or traveling to areas with active cases may be eligible to get the MMR vaccine between six months and 12 months of age. This depends on individual circumstances, so it’s important to talk with your pediatrician. 

Keep in mind that an early dose doesn’t count on the regular vaccination schedule — your child will still need two additional doses after their first birthday.

Advertisement

ANOTHER STATE CONFIRMS MEASLES CASE WITH INFECTED CHILD ITS FIRST OF YEAR

4. What if my infant is too young to get the MMR vaccine? 

If your infant is too young for the vaccine, it’s important to take extra precautions to limit their exposure to others who are or might be ill. Don’t be afraid to decline travel or gatherings — you have every right to protect your child’s health.

5. How early can my child get their second MMR vaccine? 

For children over one year, the second MMR dose can be given as early as four weeks after the first. Once they’ve received both doses, children are considered fully vaccinated and don’t require any additional doses.

“One to three of every 1,000 children infected with measles will die due to complications from the disease.”

6. We have been around other people who recently traveled. What symptoms should we watch for?  

In the early stages, symptoms to watch out for include fever, cough, runny nose, and red, irritated eyes. 

Advertisement

These symptoms usually appear seven to 14 days after initial exposure. 

7. My child is showing signs of a cold. Could this be early-stage measles?

It’s not always easy to tell, since measles shares symptoms with many other illnesses. One key differentiator is that children with measles typically display very high fevers, around 104°F. They also tend to be very fussy. 

Around the second or third day of symptoms, many patients develop small, bluish-white spots on their inner cheeks, referred to as Koplik spots — though not every child will develop these spots. The telltale red rash typically develops three to five days into the illness.

Measles outbreak across America

A child is considered fully vaccinated for measles if they have received two doses of the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine at least four weeks apart.  (Jan Sonnenmair/Getty Images)

8. What does the measles rash look like? 

This rash typically starts three to five days after the initial symptoms. It begins as small spots on the face near the hairline, then spreads downwards and can cover the entire body.

Advertisement

9. Why is measles dangerous? 

Measles can have many complications, ranging from mild to severe. About one in 10 people will develop ear infections or diarrhea. 

About one in five unvaccinated children with measles will require hospitalization. Up to one in 20 children will contract pneumonia, which is the most common cause of death from the disease. 

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

About one in 1,000 children will develop encephalitis, or inflammation and swelling of the brain. This can lead to seizures, lifelong disability or even death. In all, one to three of every 1,000 children infected with measles will die due to complications from the disease.

10. Why aren’t some people getting their kids the MMR vaccine? 

There is a growing amount of misinformation and disinformation circulating about vaccines, which has led some parents to delay or skip them altogether. 

Advertisement

The MMR vaccine has been safely administered to millions of people and has an excellent safety record — and research has repeatedly debunked the myth that the vaccine is linked to autism. 

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health

11. What should I do if I think my child might have the measles? 

Don’t wait — contact your doctor right away. They can guide you through the next steps.

The above questions and answers were provided by Allison Croucher, DO, a pediatrician and doctor of osteopathic medicine with Duly Health and Care in Illinois.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Health

‘Vaguely Threatening’: Federal Prosecutor Queries Leading Medical Journal

Published

on

‘Vaguely Threatening’: Federal Prosecutor Queries Leading Medical Journal

A federal prosecutor in Washington has contacted The New England Journal of Medicine, considered the world’s most prestigious medical journal, with questions that suggested without evidence that it was biased against certain views and influenced by external pressures.

Dr. Eric Rubin, the editor in chief of N.E.J.M., described the letter as “vaguely threatening” in an interview with The New York Times.

At least three other journals have received similar letters from Edward Martin Jr., a Republican activist serving as interim U.S. attorney in Washington. Mr. Martin has been criticized for using his office to target opponents of the administration.

His letters accused the publications of being “partisans in various scientific debates” and asked a series of accusatory questions about bias and the selection of research articles.

Do they accept submissions from scientists with “competing viewpoints”? What do they do if the authors whose work they published “may have misled their readers”? Are they transparent about influence from “supporters, funders, advertisers and others”?

Advertisement

News of the letter to N.E.J.M. was reported earlier by STAT, a health news outlet.

Mr. Martin also asked about the role of the National Institutes of Health, which funds some of the research the journals publish, and the agency’s role “in the development of submitted articles.”

Amanda Shanor, a First Amendment expert at the University of Pennsylvania, said the information published in reputable medical journals like N.E.J.M. is broadly protected by the Constitution.

In most cases, journals have the same robust rights that apply to newspapers — the strongest the Constitution provides, she added.

“There is no basis to say that anything other than the most stringent First Amendment protections apply to medical journals,” she said. “It appears aimed at creating a type of fear and chill that will have effects on people’s expression — that’s a constitutional concern.”

Advertisement

It’s unclear how many journals have received these letters or the criteria that Mr. Martin used to decide which publications to target. The U.S. attorney’s office in Washington did not respond to a request for comment.

Our job is to evaluate science and evaluate it in an unbiased fashion,” Dr. Rubin said. “That’s what we do and I think we do it well. The questions seem to suggest that there’s some bias in what we do — that’s where the vaguely threatening part comes in.”

Jeremy Berg, the former editor in chief of the journal Science, said he thought the letters were designed to “intimidate journals to bend over backward” to publish papers that align with the administration’s beliefs — on climate change and vaccines, for example — even if the quality of the research is poor.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the nation’s health secretary, singled out N.E.J.M in an interview with the “Dr. Hyman Show” podcast last year as an example of a medical journal that has participated in “lying to the public” and “retracting the real science.”

Andrew Nixon, a spokesman for the Health and Human Services Department, declined to comment on whether Mr. Kennedy had any involvement with the letters.

Advertisement

In the interview, Mr. Kennedy said he would seek to prosecute medical journals under federal anti-corruption laws.

“I’m going to litigate against you under the racketeering laws, under the general tort laws,” he said. “I’m going to find a way to sue you unless you come up with a plan right now to show how you’re going to start publishing real science.”

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the new director of N.I.H., has vigorously criticized the leadership of scientific journals. Recently he co-founded a new journal as an alternative to traditional scientific publishing. It has published contrarian views on Covid.

Other prominent journals said they had not received the letter. On Friday, The Lancet, which is based in Britain, published a scathing editorial in solidarity, calling the letters “an obvious ruse to strike fear into journals and impinge on their right to independent editorial oversight.”

“Science and medicine in the U.S.A. are being violently dismembered while the world watches,” the editorial said.

Advertisement

One of Mr. Martin’s letters was sent to the journal Chest, a low-profile publication that publishes highly technical studies on topics like lung cancer and pneumonia. The New York Times reported last week that at least two other publishers had received nearly identically worded letters.

They declined to speak publicly for fear of retribution from the Trump administration.

Dr. Rubin said he, too, was worried about political backlash. Scientific journals rely on public funds in several indirect ways — for example, universities often use federal grants to pay for subscriptions.

“Are we concerned? Of course we are,” he said. “But we want to do the right thing.”

Mr. Martin gave the journals until May 2 to respond to his questions. N.E.J.M. has already responded to Mr. Martin with a statement that pushes back against his characterization of the journal.

Advertisement

“We use rigorous peer review and editorial processes to ensure the objectivity and reliability of the research we publish,” the statement read. “We support the editorial independence of medical journals and their First Amendment rights to free expression.”

This is not the N.E.J.M’s first brush with a Trump administration.

In 2020, the journal published an editorial condemning the president’s response to the pandemic — the first time the journal had supported or condemned a political candidate in its 208-year history.

Dr. Rubin said he doubted Mr. Martin’s letter was related to the editorial. The journal Chest didn’t write about Trump’s first term yet received a letter, he noted.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending