Connect with us

Health

Is cord blood banking a worthwhile investment in your child’s future?

Published

on

Is cord blood banking a worthwhile investment in your child’s future?

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

The umbilical cord — the lifeline between mother and baby — was historically discarded as medical waste after birth.

Today, an increasing number of parents are choosing to preserve the cord blood for its potential to safeguard their child’s future health. 

Advertisement

The birth of a baby comes with an overwhelming number of decisions, one of which is whether to bank the newborn’s cord blood cells. 

MEET THE AMERICAN WHO HELPED SAVE MILLIONS OF NEWBORN BABIES, DR. VIRGINIA APGAR, PHYSICIAN AND MUSICIAN

Whether cord blood banking is worth it for a family hinges on various factors, including the present health of their child, the existence of twins in the family and many other individual considerations.

What is cord blood banking?

Cord blood banking involves the collection and storage of stem cells derived from the blood of a newborn’s umbilical cord immediately after birth. 

The reason is its potential life-saving abilities, as the hematopoietic stem cells found in cord blood have the unique ability to differentiate into various types of blood cells. 

Advertisement

There are two main types of banks for cord blood: public and private. (BSIP/UIG)

Preserving the cord blood cells provides an option for future therapeutic use in treating a range of diseases for the child or siblings. 

These stem cells are less likely to face rejection during transplant due to their immature nature. This widens the blood cells’ applicability in medical procedures for the donor or family members.

Cord blood banking process

Cord blood banking can be done from either a vaginal or surgical birth, and regardless of whether the labor was induced or occurred naturally. 

Once the parents decide to store the blood, the doctor will clamp the umbilical cord in two places and cut the cord, separating the mother from the child. 

Advertisement

Once the blood has been collected and sealed, it will be sent to a cord blood bank for storage. 

The doctor will inject a needle into the cord and collect, in general, between 60 and 300 milliliters (mL) of cord blood. The collected volume can vary, however, and not all collections will be sufficient for future therapeutic use for the child or siblings. 

Once the blood has been collected and sealed, it will be sent to a cord blood bank for storage. 

In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates cord blood banking and donation. (Education Images/Universal Images Group )

Collecting fluid in this process is relatively easy and does not cause pain to the mother or baby, according to webmd.com. 

Advertisement

The collection process generally takes around five minutes to complete.

The blood can be stored at several different sites, based on the family’s decisions and circumstances. 

  • Public cord banks. These are free to use, but donations made are available to anyone.
  • Private cord banks. These blood banks will store the blood for use only by the donor and family members of the donor. This can be an expensive option as there is a processing fee and an annual storage fee.
  • Direct-donation banks. These are a mixture of public and private banks. They store cord blood for public use but also accept donations to reserve the stem cells for the child.

Cord blood is collected immediately after birth in a painless process that does not harm the mother or the baby. (BSIP/Universal Images Group)

When discussing the options, cord blood banking often refers to private banking, while cord blood donation generally refers to public banking. 

Private cord banking may not be worth the financial expense for the family, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Academy of Pediatrics. The reason is that the price is steep for the chance that the child will need to use the blood at some point in time. 

PARENTS WELCOME 14-POUND BABY, THE LARGEST ON RECORD SINCE 2010: ‘EVERYBODY WAS MAKING BETS’

Advertisement

These organizations suggest that routine storage of cord blood for stem cells as a sort of insurance is unproven, and therefore they caution parents when considering it. 

Donating to a public storage bank could benefit the community, however, according to these organizations. 

There is usually no cost to donate cord blood to a public bank, but private banking can be pricey, involving initial collection fees and annual storage fees. (BSIP/UIG)

What are the uses of cord blood banking?

Cord blood banking can be beneficial because the stem cells are hematopoietic stem cells, meaning they are immature but can become mature cells of different types within the body.

Not only do they require less matching, they also cause fewer infections. 

Advertisement

BABY SLEEP DANGERS REVEALED IN NEW STUDY AS NEARLY 70% OF INFANT DEATHS WERE DUE TO CO-SLEEPING

The stem cells within the umbilical cord can provide life-saving assistance for several conditions later in life.

Stem cells from the umbilical cord can treat a variety of conditions, including:

  • Cancer
  • Anemia
  • Immune system disorders

Once the cord blood is collected and stored, it can remain viable for a long time. Research suggests that cord blood can be stored for at least 10 years but often much longer. (QAI Publishing/Universal Images Group )

A benefit of using cord blood stem cells is that they rarely result in infectious diseases.

They are also highly effective as they are half as likely to be rejected compared to other stem cells because they are immunogenic due to their immature nature.

Advertisement

What are the cons of cord blood banking?

There is only about an 8% usage rate of blood that has been stored through this process, according to a study cited by the National Library of Medicine. 

Part of the reason for the low rate is that the blood is not always useful for a disease that develops later on in life.

HEALTH BENEFITS OF CONSUMING VINEGAR, PLUS TIPS FROM A DIETITIAN

Many factors go into whether cord blood can be used, such as from a set of twins when one twin is healthy and the other is born with a genetic disorder. 

The blood drawn from the ill child can not be used later on for the healthy child, but the reverse could be true if the blood is a good match.

Advertisement

Patients are more likely to find a genetic match among donors of their own ethnic background. (BSIP/Universal Images Group)

There are many circumstances that the American Academy of Pediatrics lays out as not ideal conditions for cord blood banking. 

Identical twins are not often the best match for each other because a slight genetic difference in the blood cells is recommended. 

                                                                                               

Additionally, public blood banks can only accept donations from umbilical cords from a mother carrying a single child. This is due to the possibility that the blood units could get mixed up during the collection with twins.

Advertisement

Another downside of using cord blood cells is that it takes longer for them to create the therapeutic effect desired because they are hematopoietic stem cells.

How much does cord blood banking cost?

Typically, there are two separate fees involved when preserving a child’s cord blood cells, according to the American Pregnancy Association. The initial fee covers the enrollment and collection. 

Then, there is an annual storage fee.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Those who go this route can expect to pay in the range of $1,350 and $2,350 for the initial collection, testing and registering, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics. Annual storage fees often range from $100 to $175, but the costs of individual storage banks will vary.

Advertisement

Currently, research into cord blood stem cells is ongoing. Scientists are investigating the potential for treating conditions such as cerebral palsy and Type 1 diabetes. (iStock)

If the parents donate the blood cells from the umbilical cord, there is no cost. 

The future of cord blood banking

The future trajectory of cord blood banking remains uncertain. Nonetheless, preserving cord blood cells today may have significant health benefits, offering new avenues for disease treatment as the field advances. 

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews/health 

Considering the first successful umbilical cord blood stem cell transplant was performed as recently as 1988, as documented by the National Library of Medicine, the science around this practice is relatively young. 

Advertisement

With ongoing research, the scope and efficacy of cord blood use are bound to expand.

Health

Melissa Joan Hart, 49, Opens up About Weight Loss in Perimenopause

Published

on

Melissa Joan Hart, 49, Opens up About Weight Loss in Perimenopause


Advertisement




Melissa Joan Hart Opens up About Weight Loss in Perimenopause | Woman’s World




















Advertisement





Advertisement


Use left and right arrow keys to navigate between menu items.


Use escape to exit the menu.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Health

Alzheimer’s prevention breakthrough found in decades-old seizure drug

Published

on

Alzheimer’s prevention breakthrough found in decades-old seizure drug

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A drug that has long been used to treat seizures has shown promise as a potential means of Alzheimer’s prevention, a new study suggests.

The anti-seizure medication, levetiracetam, was first approved by the FDA in November 1999 under the brand name Keppra as a therapy for partial-onset seizures in adults. The approval has since expanded to include children and other types of seizures.

Northwestern University researchers recently found that levetiracetam prevented the formation of toxic amyloid beta peptides, which are small protein fragments in the brain that are commonly seen in Alzheimer’s patients.

The medication was found to prevent the formation of amyloid-beta 42 in both animal models and cultured human neurons, according to the study findings, which were published in Science Translational Medicine.

Advertisement

The effect was also seen in post-mortem human brain tissue obtained from individuals with Down syndrome, who are at high risk for Alzheimer’s disease.

The medication was found to prevent the formation of amyloid-beta 42 in both animal models and cultured human neurons. (iStock)

“While many of the Alzheimer’s drugs currently on the market, such as lecanemab and donanemab, are approved to clear existing amyloid plaques, we’ve identified this mechanism that prevents the production of the amyloid‑beta 42 peptides and amyloid plaques,” said corresponding author Jeffrey Savas, associate professor of behavioral neurology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, in a press release. 

“Our new results uncovered new biology while also opening doors for new drug targets.”

HIDDEN BRAIN CONDITION MAY QUADRUPLE DEMENTIA RISK IN OLDER ADULTS, STUDY SUGGESTS

Advertisement

The brain is better able to avoid the pathway that produces toxic amyloid‑beta 42 proteins in younger years, but the aging process gradually weakens that ability, Savas noted. 

“This is not a statement of disease; this is just a part of aging. But in brains developing Alzheimer’s, too many neurons go astray, and that’s when you get amyloid-beta 42 production,” he said. 

The effect was also seen in post-mortem human brain tissue obtained from individuals with Down syndrome, who are at high risk for Alzheimer’s disease. (iStock)

That then leads to tau (“tangles”) — abnormal clumps of protein inside brain neurons — which can kill brain cells, trigger neuroinflammation and lead to dementia.

In order for levetiracetam to function as an Alzheimer’s blocker, high-risk patients would have to start taking it “very, very early,” Savas said — up to 20 years before elevated amyloid-beta 42 levels would be detected.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

“You couldn’t take this when you already have dementia, because the brain has already undergone a number of irreversible changes and a lot of cell death,” the researcher noted.

The researchers also did a deep dive into previous human clinical data to determine whether Alzheimer’s patients who were taking the anti-seizure drug had slower cognitive decline. They reported that the patients in that category had a “significant delay” in the span from cognitive decline to death compared to those not taking the drug.

“This analysis supports the positive effect of levetiracetam to slow the progression of Alzheimer’s pathology,” the researcher said. (iStock)

“Although the magnitude of change was small (on the scale of a few years), this analysis supports the positive effect of levetiracetam to slow the progression of Alzheimer’s pathology,” Savas said.

Advertisement

Looking ahead, the research team aims to find people who have genetic forms of Alzheimer’s to participate in testing, Savas said.

Limitations and caveats

The study had several limitations, including that it relied on animal models and cultured cells, with no human trials conducted.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Because the study was observational in nature, it can’t prove that the medication caused the prevention of the toxic brain proteins, the researchers acknowledged.

Savas noted that levetiracetam “is not perfect,” cautioning that it breaks down in the body very quickly.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The team is currently working to create a “better version” that would last longer in the body and “better target the mechanism that prevents the production of the plaques.”

“You couldn’t take this when you already have dementia, because the brain has already undergone a number of irreversible changes and a lot of cell death.”

The medication’s common documented side effects include drowsiness, weakness, dizziness, irritability, headache, loss of appetite and nasal congestion.

It has also been linked to potential mood and behavior changes, including anxiety, depression, agitation and aggression, according to the prescribing information. In rare cases, it could lead to severe allergic reactions, skin reactions, blood disorders and suicidal ideation.

Advertisement

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

Funding for the study was provided by the National Institutes of Health and the Cure Alzheimer’s Fund.

Fox News Digital reached out to the drug manufacturer and the researchers for comment.

Related Article

Alzheimer’s decline could slow dramatically with one simple daily habit, study finds
Continue Reading

Health

Seniors over 80 who eat specific diet may be less likely to reach 100 years old

Published

on

Seniors over 80 who eat specific diet may be less likely to reach 100 years old

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Older adults who avoid meat in their golden years may be less likely to reach age 100 than their meat-eating counterparts, new research suggests.

Researchers tracked more than 5,000 adults aged 80 or older who were enrolled in the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey.

Between 1998 and 2018, data showed that those who did not eat meat were less likely to reach their 100th birthday than those who consumed animal products regularly.

The findings seem to contradict previous studies that have linked vegetarianism and plant-based diets to lower risks of heart disease, stroke, diabetes and obesity.

Advertisement

Most evidence supporting the benefits of plant-based diets comes from studies tracking younger populations, the researchers noted. 

The findings contrast with previous research praising plant-based diets for their positive influence on heart health. (iStock)

The study, published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, points to losses in muscle mass and bone density with age, shifts that can increase the risk of malnutrition and frailty in the “oldest old.”

As people enter their 80s and 90s, the nutritional priority often shifts from preventing long-term chronic diseases to maintaining day-to-day physical function, experts say.

HOW MUCH RED MEAT IS TOO MUCH? EXPERTS WEIGH IN ON FOOD PYRAMID UPDATES

Advertisement

“The headline ‘vegetarians over 80 less likely to reach 100’ sounds surprising, because it contrasts with decades of data linking plant‑forward diets to lower chronic disease risk earlier in life,” Erin Palinski-Wade, a New Jersey-based registered dietitian, told Fox News Digital. 

“However, once you see that this research is limited to adults over the age of 80 who are also underweight — and that this link disappears with the consumption of eggs, dairy and fish — the results are less surprising.”

While diets earlier in life tend to emphasize avoiding long-term disease, older age necessitates nutrients and weight maintenance, experts say. (iStock)

In those over 80, restricting animal proteins may be less likely to promote longevity, according to Palinski-Wade, who was not involved in the study.

Eliminating all animal protein — particularly in a population that may already experience diminished hunger cues — can make it more difficult to meet adequate protein needs, potentially increasing the risk of nutrient deficiencies, the nutritionist said.

Advertisement

ALZHEIMER’S SYMPTOMS COULD BE PREDICTED YEARS IN ADVANCE THROUGH ONE SIMPLE TEST

In addition to a higher tendency to be underweight, older populations also face a greater risk of bone fractures due to lower calcium and protein intake.

Potential limitations

The lower rate of vegetarians reaching 100 was only observed in participants identified as underweight, the researchers noted. No such association was found in people who maintained a healthy weight.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Because being underweight is already linked to greater frailty and mortality risk, the researchers noted that body weight may partly explain the findings, making it difficult to determine whether diet itself played a direct role.

Advertisement

Those incorporating animal-sourced products other than meat were just as likely to live to 100. (iStock)

Additionally, the shortened lifespans were not found in people who continued to eat non-meat animal products, such as fish, dairy and eggs. 

Older adults with these more flexible diets were just as likely to live to 100 as those eating meat, as these foods may provide the nutrients necessary for maintaining muscle and bone health, the researchers noted.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“This is an observational study, so it can only show associations, and does not prove that avoiding meat directly reduces the odds of reaching 100,” Palinski-Wade added.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

The researchers suggested that including small amounts of animal-sourced foods could help older seniors maintain essential nutrients and avoid the muscle loss often seen in those who stick strictly to plants.

Eliminating all animal protein — particularly in a population that may already experience diminished hunger cues — can make it more difficult to meet adequate protein needs, potentially increasing the risk of nutrient deficiencies. (iStock)

Palinski-Wade offered some guidance for those looking to optimize nutrition later in life.

“For adults in their 80s and beyond, especially anyone losing weight or muscle, the priority should be maintaining a healthy weight and meeting protein and micronutrient needs — even if that means adding or increasing fish, eggs, dairy or well‑planned, fortified plant proteins and supplements.”

Advertisement

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

Strict vegan or very low‑protein patterns at that age should be carefully monitored by a dietitian or clinician, with attention to B12, vitamin D, calcium and total protein, according to Palinski-Wade.

“Younger and healthier adults can still confidently use plant‑forward or vegetarian patterns to lower long‑term chronic disease risk,” she added.

Related Article

Scientists reveal the one practice that could prevent dementia as you age
Continue Reading

Trending