Connect with us

Health

Alabama woman with two uteruses is pregnant with twins, one in each womb: ‘1 in 50 million’ chance

Published

on

Alabama woman with two uteruses is pregnant with twins, one in each womb: ‘1 in 50 million’ chance

Kelsey Hatcher was just 17 when she learned she had a double uterus.

Fifteen years later, the Alabama woman got a second shock: She’s pregnant with twins, one in each uterus.

Fox News Digital spoke to the 32-year-old mother and fitness coach — she already has three children — about her extremely rare pregnancy.

MISTREATMENT IN THE MATERNITY WARD? DOCTORS WEIGH IN ON A NEW CDC REPORT: ‘OVERSTRETCHED HEALTH SYSTEM’

“I was having some minor complications that led us to set up an OB appointment, and upon examination and ultrasound, they discovered it,” she said.

Advertisement

Known as uterus didelphys, Hatcher’s condition affects only about 0.3% of the population, according to Cleveland Clinic.

Kelsey Hatcher, a 32-year-old mother and fitness coach in Alabama, spoke with Fox News Digital about her extremely rare pregnancy. (Caleb Shaver/Kelsey Hatcher)

“Essentially, the uteri are the size of one split in half.”

Hatcher had her first three children in “normal” pregnancies — Raelynn (6), River (4) and Rhemy (2).

PREGNANT WOMEN STRUGGLE TO FIND CARE IN ‘MATERNITY DESERTS,’ NEW STUDY FINDS: ‘WE NEED MORE SUPPORT’

Advertisement

For her next pregnancy, she was a little nervous going into the eight-week ultrasound. 

“As the tech scanned and said everything looked great, I confirmed, ‘There is only one, right?’” Hatcher said.

“She smiled and said yes, so I took a breath and relaxed. But I then told her, ‘I’m not sure if it’s on my chart, but I do have a second uterus, just so you aren’t alarmed.’”

Kelsey Hatcher with family

Hatcher and her husband, Caleb, have three children — Raelynn (6), River (4) and Rhemy (2). She is pregnant with two more babies, one in each uterus. (Caleb Shaver/Kelsey Hatcher)

The tech scanned over to find the other uterus.

“She didn’t even have a chance to speak before I blurted out, ‘Oh my goodness, there is another one!’” she recalled.

Advertisement

Hatcher was “in utter shock,” she said.

“I blurted out, ‘Oh my goodness, there is another one!’”

“All I could do was laugh,” she said. “I immediately called my husband, Caleb, to tell him, as he was not at the appointment with me. He and I just laughed together.”

Hatcher’s doctors were also in shock, she said, repeating how “rare and special” her case was.

The odds of any given woman having this type of pregnancy is about one in 50 million, as an OB/GYN at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston told Scientific American.

Advertisement
Kelsey and Caleb Hatcher

 “I immediately called my husband, Caleb, to tell him, as he was not at the appointment with me,” Hatcher said of the day she found out about her rare pregnancy. “He and I just laughed together.” (Caleb Shaver/Kelsey Hatcher)

Shweta Patel, M.D., assistant professor at the University of Alabama at Birmingham’s Department of OBGYN, who is also Hatcher’s obstetrician, described the pregnancy as “very surprising.”

“It’s rare enough to have a uterine didelphys, more commonly known as a double uterus, but even more rare to have a pregnancy in each uterus,” she told Fox News Digital. 

SECRETLY PREGNANT WOMAN ASKS IF SHE WAS WRONG TO ATTEND A PARTY FOR HER SISTER, WHO RECENTLY MISCARRIED

“I had to see the images of the ultrasound myself to believe it.”

Genetically, the babies — both girls — fit the definition of fraternal twins.

Advertisement

“We just have the added separation of different wombs,” Hatcher said.

Twin pregnancies ultrasound

Ultrasound photos show the twin girls, who are each in their own uterus.  (Caleb Shaver/Kelsey Hatcher)

“Since the pregnancies are in separate uteri, we know that they occurred with two separate eggs and two separate sperm, meaning they will be fraternal twins,” Patel added.

“It is so rare to have a pregnancy in each uterus that I am not sure that we know to call it anything else but a twin pregnancy.”

Risks involved with rare pregnancy

The risks involved with Hatcher’s two pregnancies are the same as with a single pregnancy, she told Fox News Digital.

“There is always a risk of preterm labor, miscarriage or uterine rupture if the baby goes too long — but all of these things are a risk with any pregnancy,” she said.

Advertisement

SPORTSCASTER ERIN ANDREWS TALKS MOTHERHOOD, FERTILITY CHALLENGES AND HEALTH SUPPLEMENTS: SO ‘IMPORTANT’

So far in Hatcher’s pregnancy, her prenatal care hasn’t been any different — “mostly because I’ve had three successful deliveries previous to the twin pregnancy,” she noted.

Her third trimester has been “a little more invasive,” however, as it’s being co-managed by her regular obstetrician and the high-risk team. 

“They are mostly just watching the girls more closely, to make sure they are growing properly and to discuss all our options for delivery,” Hatcher said.

Kelsey Hatcher pregnant

Hatcher’s doctors are allowing her to carry longer than most twin moms, in hopes that her body will go into spontaneous labor — either in both uteruses or just one.  (Caleb Shaver/Kelsey Hatcher)

Patel agreed, noting that the risks of having a twin pregnancy with one baby in each uterus are similar to having a twin pregnancy in one uterus — for example, giving birth prematurely, developing pre-eclampsia and bleeding after delivery.

Advertisement

“Kelsey has had routine prenatal care for the most part, especially in the beginning of the pregnancy,” Patel told Fox News Digital. 

“She will need more frequent ultrasound and prenatal care visits in the third trimester to monitor the babies, especially their growth.” 

“I have complete faith that this delivery will be great and will continue to beat the odds.”

The current plan is for Hatcher to have a natural, vaginal delivery. 

“We believe that because my body has done this three times before, it should be able to deliver the twins in the same way,” she said. 

Advertisement

“There are just so many factors that have to be considered.”

Kelsey Hatcher

“I have complete faith that this delivery will be great and will continue to beat the odds,” Hatcher told Fox News Digital. (Caleb Shaver/Kelsey Hatcher)

Hatcher’s doctors are allowing her to carry longer than most twin moms, in hopes that her body will go into spontaneous labor — either in both uteruses or just one. 

“They will allow me to deliver one completely if only one side goes into labor, as long as the other baby and I are well. Then they will start an induction for the second baby,” Hatcher said.

If neither uterus goes into labor on its own, the plan is for Hatcher to be induced on Dec. 22. 

Advertisement

A double Cesarean delivery is the last resort. 

“The most unpredictable part is delivery,” Patel said. “Do we deliver vaginally? Do we deliver by C-section? Besides published case studies, there is limited guidance.”

Kelsey and Caleb Hatcher

Hatcher’s doctors have told her how “rare and special” her current pregnancy is. (Caleb Shaver/Kelsey Hatcher)

“Ultimately, with the help of our UAB maternal-fetal medicine colleagues and considering Kelsey’s wishes, we were able to make our recommendations.”

Added Patel, “It takes a team to take care of such a rare pregnancy, and I am grateful that Kelsey is at UAB, where we can provide that interdisciplinary care.” 

“I’ve been extremely blessed and grateful,” Hatcher said of her experience.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

“I’ve carried all three of my previous babies to full term, two of the three even to 41 weeks,” she went on.

“I have complete faith that this delivery will be great and will continue to beat the odds.”

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Health

Nutritionists react to the red food dye ban: 'Took far too long'

Published

on

Nutritionists react to the red food dye ban: 'Took far too long'

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a ban this week on red dye No. 3, or erythrosine, from foods and oral medications due to a potential cancer risk.

Food manufacturers have until Jan. 2027 to remove the dye (Red 3) from their products, and drug manufacturers have until Jan. 2028, the Associated Press reported.

Advertisement

The dye was removed from cosmetics nearly 35 years ago for the same cancer-related concerns.

FDA BANS RED FOOD DYE DUE TO POTENTIAL CANCER RISK

Following the Wednesday announcement of the new ban, nutritionists and other health experts applauded the removal of the additives from America’s food supply.

Los Angeles-based registered dietitian nutritionist Ilana Muhlstein shared excitement about the FDA “finally” banning the synthetic dye that has been in candy, cereals and strawberry-flavored drinks for “far too long.”

Red 3 can be found in a variety of food products, most commonly candies and colorful sweets. (iStock)

Advertisement

“What is wild is that this decision comes over three decades after the same dye was banned in cosmetics like lipstick because there was enough evidence linking it to cancer in animals,” she told Fox News Digital.

CALIFORNIA PROPOSES BILL TO BAN SOME FOOD PRODUCTS WHILE NUTRITIONISTS FRET ABOUT ‘GROSS’ INGREDIENTS

“For years, consumer advocacy groups and researchers have pushed for this change, citing not only cancer risks but also potential links to hyperactivity and ADHD in kids.”

Certified holistic nutritionist and The Power of Food Education founder Robin DeCicco, based in New York, commented that “it’s about time” Red 3 was banned.

Woman eating candy

A certified holistic nutritionist (not pictured) warned that red dye No. 3 appears in some products that “you’d never expect.” (iStock)

“It never made sense to me why the dye was taken out of lipsticks and blushes 30 years ago but has been allowed to be in our food supply,” she reiterated to Fox News Digital. “There has been evidence of the dye causing cancer in rats for decades.”

Advertisement

“Our kids deserved better, and it’s frustrating that it took this long for action to be taken.”

While the ban is an “obvious win for public health,” she still feels “frustrated” that it took so long, she said.

“The FDA became aware of the risks in the 1980s, and other countries, like those in the EU, banned red dye No. 3 years ago,” she noted. “Yet big food manufacturers lobbied hard to delay this decision because these artificial dyes are cheap, convenient and profitable.”

strawberry milk

Red dye No. 3 is often used in strawberry flavoring, according to experts. (iStock)

The dye was commonly used in products that are primarily marketed to children, she noted, such as colorful lollipops, candies and breakfast cereals.

“Our kids deserved better, and it’s frustrating that it took this long for action to be taken,” Muhlstein added.

Advertisement

‘Stay informed’

The ban is a “step forward,” but Muhlstein said it’s also a reminder to “stay informed about what we’re feeding our families.”

Red dye No. 3 is included in other products that aren’t so obvious, including some pre-packaged vegan meats, fruit cups, mini muffin snacks, mashed potatoes, yellow rice and sugar-free water flavors, according to experts.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

DeCicco encouraged consumers to always read the ingredient label and to look for natural replacements for these products.

Kid eating sugary cereal

The dye was commonly used in products that are primarily marketed to children, such as colorful lollipops, candies and breakfast cereals. (iStock)

“It’s not about deprivation or restriction – I always say it’s about eating foods with high-quality ingredients,” she said. “The ingredients matter more than anything else, and they’re out there.”

Advertisement

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health

“I have worked with many families with kids who have ADHD, and removing sugar and artificial food dyes and additives can in some cases lessen symptoms (as one part of treatment),” DeCicco added.

Colorful food without carcinogens

While nutritionists recommend that consumers stay away from foods that contain red dye or erythrosine on the label, there are healthier, natural alternatives to keep food fun.

pink cupcakes in a tray

Using alternatives for red dye like pomegranate juice or fruit powder can keep food fun, according to nutritionists. (iStock)

Muhlstein recommended adding 1 to 2 tablespoons of pomegranate juice to a baking recipe, such as vanilla cake, to give the batter a natural red hue.

She also suggested mixing crushed-up, freeze-dried strawberries into white frosting or whipped cream.

Advertisement

“Beetroot powder, hibiscus powder and even mashed raspberries are great alternatives, too,” she added.

Fox News Digital’s Melissa Rudy contributed reporting. 

Continue Reading

Health

Mom’s Gripes About Sister-in-Law Put Daughter in a Bind

Published

on

Mom’s Gripes About Sister-in-Law Put Daughter in a Bind

My mother is hypercritical of my brother’s wife, to the point that she blames my sister-in-law for my brother’s “failings” (not getting a better job, not taking better care of his health, etc.). It has gotten worse now that there are grandchildren. My mother constantly criticizes how my sister-in-law is raising the kids, who are lovely and adore their grandparents.

Although my mother will occasionally raise criticisms with my sister-in-law and brother, I am mostly her audience.

I have a great relationship with my sister-in-law, and when my mother goes off on one of her rants, I defend her. I tell my mother how lucky she is to have such wonderful grandchildren, and point out that my brother is an adult who makes his own decisions. This just leads to an argument between my mother and me.

When I finally told my mother how much it hurts me to hear her say these things about my sister-in-law, she said that she needed to air her frustrations with someone. I want to be there for my mother, but I don’t like being put in this position. How do I navigate this?

From the Therapist: The short answer to your question is that you can navigate this by no longer engaging in these conversations. But I imagine you already know this. What you might be less aware of is that you aren’t being “put in this position” of supportive daughter, protective sister-in-law and unwilling confidante. You’ve chosen it, and it’s worth examining why you’ve signed up for a job you don’t want — and what makes it hard to resign.

Advertisement

Usually when we find ourselves repeatedly engaging in uncomfortable family patterns, it’s because they echo familiar roles from our childhood. It sounds as if you’re struggling with enmeshment, a relationship pattern in which boundaries between family members become blurred or are nonexistent.

Think of enmeshment as being like two trees that have grown so close together that their branches have become intertwined. While this might look like closeness, it actually prevents either tree from growing in a healthy way. In your case, your mother’s emotions and grievances have become so entangled with your own emotional life that it’s hard to distinguish where her feelings end and yours begin.

You mention wanting to “be there” for your mom even though these conversations hurt you. Many adult children who struggle to say no to their parents grew up serving as their parents’ emotional support system, or absorbing their parents’ feelings, even at the expense of their own. When you told your mother how much her venting hurt you, she responded not by acknowledging your feelings, but by asserting her need to “air her frustrations.” Her response reveals something important: She sees you as a vessel for her emotional overflow rather than as someone with valid feelings of your own. And yet, despite your hurt, you’re still more concerned about her feelings than yours.

You’re asking how to navigate this situation, but I think the deeper question is: How can you begin to value your own emotional needs?

You can start by reframing what it means to make a reasonable request, which is essentially what setting a boundary is. A boundary isn’t about pushing someone away. Instead, it’s about making a bid for connection. It’s saying:I want to feel good being close to you, but when you do X, it makes me want to avoid you. Help me come closer.”

Advertisement

Establishing a boundary consists of three steps:

  • State the issue and the desire to come closer (what will make this possible): “Mom, I love you and want to support you, but these conversations about my sister-in-law put me in an impossible position and make me want to avoid talking with you, which I know isn’t what either of us wants. I’m happy to talk about other things together, but in order to keep our relationship strong, I need this topic to be off limits.”

  • Set the boundary (what you will do): “If you’re struggling with their choices, I’m happy to support you in finding a therapist who can help you work through these feelings. But if you bring up these frustrations with me, I’m going to end the conversation and we can talk another time about other things.”

  • Hold the boundary (do what you say): A boundary isn’t about what the other person will or won’t do. A boundary is a contract with yourself. If you say you’ll end the conversation when your mom brings up your sister-in-law, you need to hold that boundary every single time. If you end the conversation only 90 percent of the time, then why would the other person honor your request when 10 percent of the time, you can’t honor it yourself? Honoring your request might sound like: “Mom, I’m going to end the conversation now because I’m not comfortable talking about my sister-in-law. I love you, and we’ll talk later.”

If you start to feel guilty, remember that just because someone sends you guilt doesn’t mean you have to accept delivery. Remind yourself that when you become your mother’s outlet for criticism of your sister-in-law, you’re participating in a cycle that strains loyalties and causes you personal distress. And keep in mind that being a good daughter means setting boundaries that encourage our parents to grow, rather than enabling patterns that harm our family relationships.

Want to Ask the Therapist? If you have a question, email askthetherapist@nytimes.com. By submitting a query, you agree to our reader submission terms. This column is not a substitute for professional medical advice.

Continue Reading

Health

Cancer death rates decline yet new diagnoses spike for some groups, says report

Published

on

Cancer death rates decline yet new diagnoses spike for some groups, says report

A major annual cancer report has revealed a mix of good news and points of concern.

Cancer diagnoses are expected to exceed two million in 2025, with approximately 618,120 deaths predicted, according to the American Cancer Society’s annual cancer trends report, which was published today in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.

ACS researchers compiled data from central cancer registries and from the National Center for Health Statistics.

ALCOHOL LINKED TO CANCER RISK IN US SURGEON GENERAL’S NEW ADVISORY

Advertisement

While mortality rates have declined, certain groups are seeing a spike in diagnoses, the report noted.

Cancer diagnoses are expected to exceed two million in 2025, with approximately 618,120 deaths predicted. (iStock)

“Continued reductions in cancer mortality because of drops in smoking, better treatment and earlier detection is certainly great news,” said lead author Rebecca Siegel, senior scientific director of surveillance research at the ACS in Georgia, in a press release.

“However, this progress is tempered by rising incidences in young and middle-aged women, who are often the family caregivers, and a shifting cancer burden from men to women, harkening back to the early 1900s, when cancer was more common in women.”

Overall decline in death rates

Cancer death rates dropped 34% between 1991 and 2022, according to the ACS report.

Advertisement

That equates to approximately 4.5 million deaths avoided due to early detection, reductions in smoking, and improvements in treatment, the report stated.

Cancer death rates dropped 34% between 1991 and 2022.

Several factors likely contributed to this decline, noted John D. Carpten, Ph.D., chief scientific officer at City of Hope, a national cancer research and treatment organization in California.

“I think a big one is smoking cessation and the battle against lung cancer, which has always been the most common form of cancer and is tied to tobacco use,” Carpten told Fox News Digital in an on-camera interview.

Cancer screenings

“Screening programs are a critical component of early detection, and expanding access to these services will save countless lives.” (iStock)

“But without a doubt, I think new and better methods for early detection, and screening for colorectal cancer and other forms of the disease, have also allowed us to see a decrease.” 

Advertisement

Lifestyle improvements have also helped to decrease mortality, he said, along with the development of new and better therapies for cancer.

LIVER CANCER PATIENT GIVEN 6 MONTHS TO LIVE LOSES 76 POUNDS EATING SPECIFIC FOODS

Despite overall declines in mortality, the report revealed that death rates are rising for cancers of the oral cavity, pancreas, uterine corpus and liver (for females).

Some common cancers have also seen an increase in diagnoses, including breast (female), prostate, pancreatic, uterine corpus, melanoma (female), liver (female) and oral cancers associated with the human papillomavirus, the report stated.

Increased diagnoses among certain groups

Diagnoses for many cancer types are increasing among certain groups.

Advertisement

Cancer rates for women 50 to 64 years of age have surpassed those for men, the report revealed. For women under 50, rates are 82% higher than males in that age group.

Doctor with cancer patient

The report revealed that diagnoses of colorectal cancer in men and women under 65 and cervical cancer in women between 30 and 44 years of age has increased. (iStock)

As far as what is influencing the “disconcerting trend” in women’s cancers, Carpten said it is likely “highly nuanced” and will require additional research.

“The decrease in fertility and increases in obesity that we’ve seen are risk factors for breast cancer, especially in postmenopausal middle-aged women,” he said. 

“But there could be other modifiable risk factors at play, like alcohol and physical activity.”

Cancer rates for women 50 to 64 years of age have surpassed those for men.

Advertisement

Another trend in the increase in early cancers is occurring in individuals under the age of 50, Carpten noted.

In particular, the report revealed that diagnoses of colorectal cancer in men and women under 65 and cervical cancer in women between 30 and 44 years of age has increased.

Woman cancer mother

Some common cancers have also seen an increase in diagnoses, including breast (female), prostate, pancreatic, uterine corpus, melanoma (female), liver (female) and oral cancers associated with the human papillomavirus. (iStock)

The report also discusses inequities in cancer rates among certain ethnic groups, with Native American and Black people experiencing higher diagnoses of some cancer types.

“Progress against cancer continues to be hampered by striking, wide static disparities for many racial and ethnic groups,” said senior author Dr. Ahmedin Jemal, senior vice president of surveillance and health equity science at the ACS, in the release.

AI DETECTS OVARIAN CANCER BETTER THAN HUMAN EXPERTS IN NEW STUDY

Advertisement

The report shows mixed trends for children, with diagnoses declining in recent years for patients 14 years of age and younger, but rising for adolescents between 15 and 19.

“Mortality rates have dropped by 70% in children and by 63% in adolescents since 1970, largely because of improved treatment for leukemia,” the ACS stated in the release.

Pancreatic cancer a growing concern

The ACS report also warns about “lagging progress” against pancreatic cancer, the third-leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. 

pancreatic cancer 3D rendering

The ACS report also warns about “lagging progress” against pancreatic cancer, the third-leading cause of cancer death in the U.S.  (iStock)

Rates of diagnoses and deaths from the disease type are on the rise.

“Pancreatic is an incredibly deadly form of cancer,” Carpten said. 

Advertisement

One of the main issues with pancreatic cancer, he said, is that it sometimes can grow in an individual for up to 10 years before it’s detected.

“If we can identify those cancers when they’re at at a curable stage, we can improve outcomes.”

One of the best opportunities for beating pancreatic cancer is early detection, Carpten said. 

“By the time those cancers have advanced, they’ve spread to the liver or other organs, and they’re almost impossible to cure at that stage,” he said.

      

Advertisement

“If we can identify those cancers when they’re at a curable stage, we can improve outcomes.”

‘It takes a village’

Making progress in fighting cancer “takes a village,” Carpten told Fox News Digital.

“It will require partnerships between the community, the health care system, cancer researchers, government, industry — we all have to work together if we want to continue to see a decrease and an ultimate increase in cures,” he said.

young doctor researches in lab

“We all have to work together if we want to continue to see a decrease and an ultimate increase in cures,” a cancer researcher said. (iStock)

Dr. Wayne A. I. Frederick, interim chief executive officer of the American Cancer Society and the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN), stated that the report highlights the need to “increase investment in both cancer treatment and care, including equitable screening programs.”

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Advertisement

“Screening programs are a critical component of early detection, and expanding access to these services will save countless lives,” he said in the release.

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health

“We also must address these shifts in cancer incidence, mainly among women. A concerted effort between health care providers, policymakers and communities needs to be prioritized to assess where and why mortality rates are rising.”

Fox News Digital reached out to the ACS for further comment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending