Finance
This week in Bidenomics: Uh-oh, reflation
Is the dragon slain? Or just wounded?
Inflation has been the scourge of the economy for the last three years. It spiked from a benign 1.4% when President Biden took office in 2021 to a searing 9% some 18 months later. The Federal Reserve took aim with speedy interest rate hikes, and it seemed to work. By September, inflation was down to 2.4%, almost in the normal zone.
Then, an upward blip. The latest data shows inflation ticked back up to 2.6% in October. That could be a spot on the X-ray that turns out to be nothing. Or it could signal that inflation is making a comeback, which would scramble the outlook for interest rates, financial markets, and the policies of the incoming Trump administration.
The inflation uptick in October wasn’t a fluke based on hurricanes or other one-time anomalies. Most important goods and services categories rose, including food, energy, rent, and vehicles. This came one month after the Fed basically declared victory over inflation. In September, the Fed reversed monetary policy and started cutting interest rates, signaling that the time had come to worry more about keeping growth humming than about getting prices down.
The Fed is staying the course for now. It cut short-term rates again on Nov. 14 and may do so again at its next policy meeting in December. But the odds of more rate cuts are dropping, with policymakers waiting for more lab results in the form of forthcoming inflation data.
“Inflation might soon be front-page news again,” Capital Economics announced in a Nov. 13 analysis. The forecasting firm argues that the currently inflationary trend is OK, but the future outlook is more worrisome — in large part because of what Donald Trump plans to do once he takes office next January.
At least two elements of Trump’s agenda are inflationary: new tariffs on imports and the mass deportation of undocumented migrants. Tariffs are taxes that raise the cost of imported goods directly. Deporting migrants would reduce the size of the labor force, especially targeting lower-wage workers. Replacing them with workers who might demand higher pay — or with costly machines — would raise costs one way or another, with producers passing as much as they could on to consumers.
A third inflation concern is Trump’s desire to cut taxes further, which can have a stimulus effect by putting more money in people’s pockets, boosting spending and demand and sometimes leading to higher prices.
Drop Rick Newman a note, follow him on Twitter, or sign up for his newsletter.
“Given all that President-elect Trump has promised to do quickly — such as hike tariffs, cut taxes further and slash immigration — one can easily foresee a re-acceleration of inflation next year,” Bernard Baumohl, chief global economist at Economic Outlook Group, wrote on Nov. 13. “The Federal Reserve is now in a real quandary.”
Finance
Four things we learned from Wisconsin’s 2024-25 NCAA financial filing
Fickell explains the value of players being on board in January
Wisconsin Badgers head coach Luke Fickell explains the value of players being on board in January.
Provided by Wisconsin Badger Football
MADISON – The cost of doing business for the Wisconsin Badgers is nearing the $200 million mark.
The Wisconsin athletic department had $197.9 million in total operating revenue and $193.6 million in total operating expenses in the 2024-25 fiscal year, according to the annual financial report that was due to the NCAA this month and obtained by the Journal Sentinel.
Those figures are up from $190.6 million and $186.7 million, respectively, in the 2023-24 fiscal year. They are nearly identical to UW’s $197.7 million in revenue and $194 million in expenses in 2022-23.
The annual NCAA financial filing comes with several caveats. The way that the NCAA measures revenue and expenses are different from the way that universities may internally count revenue and expenses in their operating budgets. (So the $4.3 million difference in revenue and expenses on the NCAA report does not necessarily equate to a $4.3 million profit.)
The 2024-25 fiscal year ended on June 30, 2025, so the report that becomes available in January 2027 will be more illuminating regarding how Wisconsin is using its resources in the era of direct player compensation following the House vs. NCAA settlement.
That being said, here are three takeaways from the financial report:
Wisconsin’s revenue increasingly tied to media rights
As Wisconsin’s revenue continues to increase, the portion that comes from media rights income unsurprisingly also continues to rise.
The Badgers reported $62.9 million in media rights income in 2024-25 – the second year of the Big Ten’s massive media rights deal with Fox, CBS and NBC – which was up $15.5 million from the $47.4 million in 2023-24. That represented 31.8% of UW’s total reported revenue for 2024-25.
The only other categories that made up more than 10% of total revenue were ticket sales (19.4%), contributions (12.9%) and royalties, licensing, advertisement and sponsorships (12.5%).
Wisconsin reported significantly fewer contributions in the 2024-25 report than in the 2023-24 report – a $16.2 million decrease from $41.8 million in 2023-24 to $25.6 million in 2024-25. But Wisconsin reports the philanthropic funding drawn from the UW Foundation rather than how many contributions the foundation received. So a decrease in reported contributions simply indicates less of a reliance on donations for that fiscal year.
Team travel costs are lower in first season of expanded Big Ten
One of Wisconsin’s biggest areas of savings was in team travel.
After spending $13.7 million in team travel in the 2023-24 fiscal year, Wisconsin reported only $11.2 million in spending on team travel in 2024-25 – an 18.1% decrease. The drop in team travel spending was despite the Big Ten’s addition of USC, UCLA, Oregon and Washington.
Much of that increase can be tied to men’s basketball, which went from spending $2.4 million on travel in 2023-24 to $1.5 million in 2024-25. Football also saw a drop in travel costs from $3.7 million to $3.2 million, which is unsurprising given the proximity of road games at Iowa and Northwestern.
Ticket revenue was booming for volleyball, stagnant for basketball programs
The Kelly Sheffield-led Wisconsin volleyball program has kept winning on the court and in the box office.
Wisconsin volleyball ticket sales jumped from $1.6 million in the 2023-24 fiscal year to $2.3 million in the 2024-25 fiscal year. It is a 36.8% one-year increase and a remarkable 216.3% three-year increase since Wisconsin’s national-championship-winning season.
Football ticket sales revenue increased from $24.1 million in 2023-24 to $25.8 million in 2024-25 despite subpar results in Luke Fickell’s second season. The Badgers went 5-7 in 2024 and missed a bowl game for the first time since 2001. (The ticket sales figures from Fickell’s most recent 4-8 season will be in the 2025-26 NCAA financial report that comes out in January 2027.)
Men’s and women’s basketball each experienced decreases in ticket sales in 2024-25. Greg Gard’s program saw a slight dip from roughly $6.7 million to $6.6 million in ticket sales, and women’s basketball saw a drop from $333,584 to $265,680 in Marisa Moseley’s final season at the helm.
Wisconsin women’s basketball benefited in 2023-24 from a home game against Caitlin Clark and Iowa women’s basketball, which drew sellouts across the country. With Clark off to the WNBA and Iowa not on the home slate in 2024-25, UW did not have that same boost.
An athletic department spokesman said the 2024-25 women’s basketball ticket sales were in line with expectations, and the slight fluctuation for men’s basketball was a result of the home schedule being “less conducive for single-game ticket sales.”
Which Wisconsin teams had biggest budgets in 2024-25
Nearly half of Wisconsin’s total operating expenses – $88.9 million of the $193.6 million – were not attributed to a specific team. That keeps any comparisons between different programs at different schools – Wisconsin football vs. Illinois football, for example – from being apples-to-apples.
But the total operating expenses reported for each team does give some idea of where the Badgers are devoting their financial resources within the athletic department. Here are the six teams that had the highest team-specific total operating expenses in 2024-25:
- Football: $41.5 million
- Men’s basketball: $12.4 million
- Men’s ice hockey: $5.5 million
- Women’s volleyball: $5.3 million
- Women’s basketball: $5.2 million
- Women’s ice hockey: $4.3 million
All other UW teams were below $4 million. Men’s tennis had the lowest total operating expenses of any UW team at just over $1 million.
Finance
German finance minister supports Macron on readying EU trade ‘bazooka’ against Trump
“Everything must be prepared now,” he added, while also emphasizing “we are ready to find solutions. We are extending our hand, but we are not prepared to be blackmailed.”
French President Emmanuel Macron’s office had announced Sunday that France would ask the EU to activate the bloc’s Anti-Coercion Instrument, nicknamed the trade bazooka.
Germany is usually more reluctant to take such far-reaching measures, not least to protect its ailing and export-dependent economy. But Klingbeil’s latest comments signal a willingness to take a harder line with Washington — at least on the part of his Social Democrats, that govern in a coalition government with Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s conservatives.
“We are constantly experiencing new provocations. We are constantly experiencing new antagonism, which President Trump is seeking. And here we Europeans must make it clear that the limit has been reached,” Klingbeil said.
All eyes are now on Merz, who will speak to journalists later on Monday and has in the past been more conciliatory toward the Trump administration than the center-left vice chancellor.
Finance
Newton Finance Committee Allocates $300,000 For New Management Positions in Mayor’s Office
The Newton Finance Committee gathered on Monday to discuss the allocation of a $300,000 transfer to two new management positions in the mayor’s office, chief of community services and chief of staff.
Chief Operating Officer (COO) Josh Morse, explained that these two new positions are aimed at both supporting the ongoing work and reducing the amount of work that comes to the COO’s table.
“It’s a growth period—more of an institutional growth, not necessarily budget growth,” Morse said.
Maureen Lemieux, chief financial officer (CFO) for the mayor’s office, emphasized that the funding request relies on repurposing existing salary funds that will not be used this fiscal year, rather than drawing from reserves or new revenue sources.
“We didn’t want to ask to take money from free cash or even the budget reserve,” Lemieux said. “We wanted to repurpose funds that had already been budgeted this year for salaries for these couple of positions.”
Instead of drawing smaller amounts of funds from several different departments, they decided to draw greater amounts from fewer departments to make the process simpler, explained Lemieux.
“We’re asking to take the money from three different departments,” Lemieux said.
Morse has worked for the city for the past 18 years, five of which he’s spent in the executive office, and he explained how past COOs have been trampled by their workload.
“It was always one single person managing all of the departments, supporting all of our city councilors, supporting 88,000 residents and 13 villages,” Morse said. “There were so many things that those incredible employees wanted to accomplish, but they just struggled to even get away from their desk because they were triple, quadruple booked every hour of the day.”
Morse also believes that working directly with people and stepping into the community is more important than looking at paperwork all day.
“Opportunities to really discuss what we can do as a city to help improve working conditions or just make sure that we’re adequately supporting and maximizing efficiencies with our frontline staff are important,” Morse said. “And conveying, you know, the message, about how much we support them and how much we really appreciate the work that they do and listening, really listening to them.”
This $300,000 transfer will not only benefit Morse and his ability to remain in close contact with the city, but it will also allow Lemieux to step down for retirement and train the new CFO, Lemieux explained.
“In addition to that, what we’re asking for is funding to allow me to retire in about 6 months, for us to be able to search for and bring on a new CFO before I go, so that we can have some time for an overlap between my tenure and when the new CFO would take over,” Lemieux said.
Although the committee ultimately agreed to the $300,000 budget transfer, they raised concerns about whether the vacant positions from which the funds were reallocated could be filled.
“We are absolutely not putting those positions on hold … there is absolutely no intent to be shorting that department,” Lemieux said.
Lemieux reiterated that the funds would be taken out of practicality rather than necessity, meaning that those departments could still hire if needed.
Morse then emphasized that these positions would provide needed growth to Newton by allowing the Mayor’s office to continue working efficiently and growing.
“If people see that upward mobility and support, they’re more likely to stick around, and it’s better for us because it makes us more resilient as a city,” Morse said.
-
Montana1 week agoService door of Crans-Montana bar where 40 died in fire was locked from inside, owner says
-
Virginia1 week agoVirginia Tech gains commitment from ACC transfer QB
-
Montana1 week ago‘It was apocalyptic’, woman tells Crans-Montana memorial service, as bar owner detained
-
Minnesota1 week agoICE arrests in Minnesota surge include numerous convicted child rapists, killers
-
Detroit, MI5 days agoSchool Closings: List of closures across metro Detroit
-
Lifestyle5 days agoJulio Iglesias accused of sexual assault as Spanish prosecutors study the allegations
-
Oklahoma1 week agoMissing 12-year-old Oklahoma boy found safe
-
Oregon1 week agoDan Lanning Gives Oregon Ducks Fans Reason to Believe