The meeting was only one-third of the way through, but the exasperation in the air was palpable.
“There’s a level of frustration that’s happening throughout the room, and I don’t mean just up here, I think it’s everybody,” said South Pasadena Councilmember Janet Braun, who serves as the City Council’s liaison to the city’s Finance Commission.
Braun’s comments at this week’s Finance Commission meeting came as tensions continue to mount over the proposed fiscal year ’24-’25 budget, which the South Pasadena City Council is set to adopt next Wednesday, July 31.
South Pasadena City Hall is seen on Friday, July 26, 2024. The city is facing financial challenges after an analysis in the beginning of this year projected a $3.7 million deficit. (Photo by Sarah Reingewirtz, Los Angeles Daily News/SCNG)
Police pass the Fair Oaks Pharmacy, a South Pasadena landmark since 1915, on Friday, July 26, 2024. The city is facing financial challenges after an analysis in the beginning of this year projected a $3.7 million deficit. (Photo by Sarah Reingewirtz, Los Angeles Daily News/SCNG)
Advertisement
People pass the Fair Oaks Pharmacy, a South Pasadena landmark since 1915, on Friday, July 26, 2024. The city is facing financial challenges after an analysis in the beginning of this year projected a $3.7 million deficit. (Photo by Sarah Reingewirtz, Los Angeles Daily News/SCNG)
South Pasadena City Hall is seen on Friday, July 26, 2024. The city is facing financial challenges after an analysis in the beginning of this year projected a $3.7 million deficit. (Photo by Sarah Reingewirtz, Los Angeles Daily News/SCNG)
South Pasadena City Hall is seen on Friday, July 26, 2024. The city is facing financial challenges after an analysis in the beginning of this year projected a $3.7 million deficit. (Photo by Sarah Reingewirtz, Los Angeles Daily News/SCNG)
1 of 5
Advertisement
South Pasadena City Hall is seen on Friday, July 26, 2024. The city is facing financial challenges after an analysis in the beginning of this year projected a $3.7 million deficit. (Photo by Sarah Reingewirtz, Los Angeles Daily News/SCNG)
Expand
Despite efforts to finalize the financial document, its adoption has already been delayed by about a month after city officials expressed concerns about discrepancies on June 27.
While the Finance Commission meetings are meant to solve these issues, recent events suggest the budget may face further delays, adding to uncertainties about the city’s financial outlook after it narrowly avoided a $3.7 million deficit.
“Based on an impasse between the Finance Commission and the Finance Director during its two commission meetings on July 16th and July 23rd, I am not sure if the Finance Director can close the gap,” Mayor Evelyn Zneimer said in an email on Thursday, July 25.
Zneimer expressed concerns about the “true numbers of the revenues and expenditures,” noting that the Finance Department has not reconciled the city’s monthly bank statements since February 2024.
Advertisement
“If the Council is not satisfied with the explanation from the Finance Director and the Finance Commission does not recommend adoption, then we might have to postpone the July 31st meeting to the next regular council meeting,” she said.
South Pasadena Finance Director John Downs announced his retirement in April but was brought back on a temporary basis to finalize the FY 24-25 budget, city officials said.
When reached by the phone on Thursday, July 25, Downs, citing a busy schedule, declined the interview at the time. However, during the Tuesday, July 23, Finance Commission meeting, Downs defended his approach. He also said the staff will present an updated budget document to the City Council next week.
“That will be presented to both of you at the time,” he told the commissioners. “Everyone here has received a copy of the punch list, so everybody has a list of the punch list, those things will be incorporated into the document.”
But the commissioners expressed concerns that they won’t have a copy of the budget report before next week’s meeting.
Advertisement
“My assumption was that these working sessions last week and this week would be included in a revised document. John was working under a different set of assumptions. I’m glad it finally came out,” Finance Commission Chair Peter Giulioni Jr. said.
According to the proposed FY 24-25 budget, as of July 1, 2024, the general fund balance is estimated to be $22 million. For FY 24-25, the city expects to receive $41.2 million in revenue and spend $39.9 million.
South Pasadena has faced a tumultuous year, beginning with budgetary missteps that included a projected $3.7 million deficit.
During a joint City Council and Finance Commission meeting on Feb. 21, a third-party consultant, NHA Advisors, LLC, estimated that the city’s expenses would outpace its general fund revenues over the next five years, with deficits ranging from $1.8 million this fiscal year to $3.9 million in FY 28-29.
In response to this dire forecast, Braun recommended forming an ad hoc committee “to address the immediate financial and operational situation.”
Advertisement
According to her, the city’s financial problems began even earlier with the City Council’s adoption of the FY 23-24 budget in June 2023, which included a $2 million deficit.
That budget was approved on the condition that the Finance Commission would work with staff to understand the negative fund balances and provide a five-year projection, she said. The City Council received this projection on Feb. 21, along with a mid-year budget report.
“Accompanying that report was the mid-year budget report, which projects not the $2 million deficit originally approved and on which the five-year projections were built, but maybe that is incorrect, I’ve learned,” Braun said. “But an actual deficit for the current year of $3.7 million. We have been delivered a financial nuclear bomb.”
She also criticized what she described as “the staff’s resistance to work with the Finance Commission over the past several months, despite the direction from the City Council last June.”
Following Braun’s alarming assessment, the ad hoc committee was formed. It consisted of Zneimer, Braun, Giulioni, and Finance Commission Vice Chair Sheila Rossi.
Advertisement
However, this committee was nearly dissolved after complaints from former Finance Commissioner Ed Elsner, who argued that the committee violated Brown Act because its discussion and formation were not listed on the Feb. 21 meeting agenda.
During a meeting on March 20, Councilmember Jon Primuth argued that the committee “had a very strong political agenda.” Councimember Michael A. Cacciotti described the committee as “a duplicative body” and “a waste of time, a waste of our resources”.
The City Council subsequently voted 3-2 against reauthorizing the committee, with Primuth, Cacciotti and Councilmember Jack Donovan voting against reauthorizing, Zneimer and Braun voting in favor.
But public concern over the deficit projections grew, prompting the City Council to reinstate the committee on May 1. The panel decided that the committee would be resurrected after July 1, by which time the FY 24-25 would’ve been adopted.
Nevertheless, that plan also fell short.
Advertisement
While the City Council had hoped to adopt the FY 24-25 budget before the current fiscal year ends on June 30. However, during a June 27 meeting, the panel, citing discrepancies in the numbers in the financial report, voted to go with the Finance Commission’s recommendation to delay the budget adoption.
Instead, the panel approved a resolution of continuing appropriations, authorizing the city to use appropriations for ongoing projects for 60 days or until the adoption of the budget, whichever comes first.
Using continuing appropriations could lead to administrative inefficiencies, restricted financial management and uncertainty for long-term planning, according to a staff report. However, the pros of this method are that it could help avoid government shutdown, maintains the status quo and provides more time for budget negotiations.
According to a staff report, the proposed FY 24-25 budget is balanced and shows a projected surplus. In addition, the previously projected $3.7 million deficit was mitigated by the discovery of unused funds.
But there are several problems with the proposed budget, Rossi said in a recent interview.
Advertisement
“I don’t really have a lot of trust in the numbers that are in the budget, because we still haven’t received the third quarter financials,” she said. “They gave us the third quarter summary, but it turns out that they haven’t finished their bank reconciliations for February. “
Rossi also expressed concerns that the revenue projections in the proposed budget are overstated by $700,000 to $900,000 based on the projections from two third party consultants the city hired.
Meanwhile, the city has hired LSL finance consultants to help with back-office accounting and reconcile the bank statements, the mayor said.
“Hopefully LSL could clarify the true numbers so that by August 21, we might be able to adopt the budget subject to any conditions that the Council might impose,” she said. “But then I have the other four Councilmembers to weigh in on the situation and I don’t know where they stand. So everything will depend on how the meeting will go on July 31.”
The city has also been dealing with a string of staff departures, which culminated in the stepping down of former City Manager Arminé Chaparyan on June 24. She received a lump-sum severance benefit in the amount of $307,500, $1,727.10 of unused management leave and a cash payment for all properly accrued and unused vacation time.
Advertisement
On Friday, July 26, the City Council approved a resolution appointing Donald Penman to serve as interim manager. Penman previously served as city manager for the cites of Arcadia, San Fernando and Baldwin Park.
He will start on Monday, July 29.
Rossi said “nothing is at stake” if the City Council doesn’t passes the budget next week.
But one thing was expected: A long night.
“The best we can do is to create a punch list and that we all need to bring our pajamas and cots on the evening of the 31st, that it’s going to be an extraordinarily long evening, if we are going to ask the City Council to either reject or accept each line item that we’re discussing right now,” Giulioni said.
Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has responded to renewed criticism about the network’s total value locked (TVL) and relatively sluggish decentralized finance (DeFi) growth.
On October 31, Hoskinson acknowledged the gap between Cardano’s DeFi activity and leading blockchains like Ethereum and Solana. However, he said the numbers fail to capture the network’s broader participation and governance strength.
Sponsored
Cardano Bets on Bitcoin Interoperability to Unlock Billions in DeFi Liquidity
Hoskinson pushed back on the long-standing belief that introducing major stablecoins such as USDT or USDC would automatically transform Cardano’s DeFi ecosystem.
“No one’s ever made the argument and explained how the existence of one of these larger stablecoins is magically going to make Cardano’s entire DeFi problem go away, make the price go up, massively improve our MAUs, our TVL, and all these other things,” he said.
He argued that their arrival alone would not solve the network’s structural challenges or guarantee growth.
Advertisement
According to him, Cardano already has native, asset-backed stablecoins like USDM and USDA that can be minted at will and rarely lose their peg.
Sponsored
Instead, Hoskinson pointed to user behavior as the main reason Cardano’s DeFi TVL remains small.
For context, he noted that the network has about 1.3 million users who stake or participate in governance, collectively holding more than $15 billion in ADA.
However, those figures don’t count toward TVL metrics, and most ADA holders remain passive participants rather than active liquidity providers.
Advertisement
“Cardano has a fertile ecosystem. There’s a lot of people floating around. There’s a lot of people who hold ADA, who have Cardano wallets, who have been in our ecosystem — in many cases more than five years. But not a lot of those people have crossed the chasm to use DeFi in Cardano,” he stated.
Sponsored
He added that this distinction creates a “chicken-and-egg” loop for Cardano’s ecosystem. According to Hoskinson, the network’s low activity deters partnerships and liquidity, while the lack of external integrations further limits on-chain adoption.
To counter these limitations, Hoskinson outlined a multi-year roadmap that ties DeFi growth to real-world finance and Bitcoin interoperability.
He highlighted the Midnight network—a privacy-focused sidechain—and RealFi, a microfinance platform targeting African markets, as key initiatives.
Both will integrate with Bitcoin DeFi, allowing ADA and BTC to be lent, converted into stablecoins, and used in real-world lending products.
Advertisement
Sponsored
Hoskinson expects this combination to drive “billions of dollars” in new liquidity while attracting Bitcoin’s vast capital base. He also cited ongoing projects such as Leios, as proof that Cardano continues to evolve at the protocol level.
Still, he conceded that Cardano’s core issue is coordination and accountability, not technology.
“It’s not a technology problem. It’s not a node problem. It’s not a problem of imagination and creativity. It’s not a problem of execution. We can pretty much do anything. It’s a problem of governance and coordination and ultimately accountability and responsibility,” Hoskinson said.
To fix this, he proposed delegating clear responsibility for ecosystem expansion. He also called for targeted marketing and event strategies to mobilize ADA holders toward DeFi participation.
“The problem isn’t the ability to do a marketing campaign. The problem isn’t our ability to ship great software. It’s that there’s no one accountable to actually conceive of it, execute it, and be held accountable to the outcome of it. That’s the problem in a nutshell. So that is the problem we have to solve next year as we look to 2026,” He stated.
Our advice columnists have heard it all over the years—so we’re diving into the Pay Dirt archives to share classic letters with our readers. Submit your own questions about money here. (It’s anonymous!)
Dear Pay Dirt,
I am a mid-30s single woman with no kids, and because of my credit score—low 500s—I feel like I am invisible. I don’t qualify for a credit card, I can’t rent a car, I can’t get an apartment without my parents co-signing. I have “modest” student loans—$38,000—that because of the CARES Act have finally come out of collections, but nothing on my credit score has changed.
I don’t know where to begin to resolve this, and I feel like I’m failing at life. I’m even embarrassed to seriously date anyone because of my financial status. I work in the restaurant industry in an expensive city, and so even though I make decent money, when it comes down to it I’m still living paycheck to paycheck. How do I get out of this?
—I Don’t Exist
Advertisement
Dear I Don’t Exist,
You are not alone. Millions of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, and not because they’re irresponsible or have done anything wrong. There are probably many people you know who are struggling with similar issues, and you’re unaware of it because people are embarrassed to talk about financial struggles. We live in a country where people equate money with success and hard work, even though financial security is often determined by other factors, and there are plenty of people who work incredibly hard and still have trouble making ends meet.
There are also trade-offs we choose to make that mean forgoing options that might be financially more secure. If you work in the restaurant industry in an expensive city, I imagine you’re in a competitive job and that to some extent you enjoy it and the things that come with the expensive city, or you’d consider a move. It’s worth thinking about what these trade offs are, and how you value them—good and bad.
But also know that your situation is not unusual and try to be kinder to yourself. First, you should consider talking to a credit counselor. There are non-profits that specialize in helping people repair credit and get on track financially. I know it probably creates some anxiety for you to talk about these things, but having a plan will reduce your anxiety about it longer-term, and taking that first step will make you feel a lot better. When you have debt and no concrete plan for getting out of it, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed and that the situation is insurmountable. Talking to a professional will help you envision and figure out a path out of it.
Lastly, you shouldn’t be embarrassed to date because you have debt. Lots of people have debt, and a date is not a lifelong commitment to combine assets. Just be upfront about your situation to anyone it seems like you might be developing feelings for—and not just as a matter of disclosure, but because it’s important to you and shapes how you’re making decisions in your life right now. There plenty of people out there who are potential partners who can sympathize with your situation, and anyone who can’t probably isn’t for you anyway.
Advertisement
—E.S.
From: I’m Worried The Government Will Force Me To Pay For My Stepkids’ College. (February 10th, 2022).
Please keep questions short (
Thanks! Your question has been submitted.
Dear Pay Dirt,
Advertisement
My spending habits are hard to categorize. I’m sometimes frugal and sometimes a splurger, depending on the situation. The only thing is I hate splurging when I don’t want to. This has come up recently with my new boyfriend. He loves to spend a lot of money on takeout. I don’t. I hate cooking, but I like getting the most bang out of my buck when I eat out, unless there is something I really, really like on the menu. I’d prefer just to get a main course, and then if I want an appetizer or more food, it would be something I bought from the store. My boyfriend really likes taking care of me, and that sometimes means he orders extra food.
The problem is we’ve started trading off who pays, and I don’t want to pay a ton for all the extra food he wants. This last time we picked up a to-go order, I was driving home and he had to order. He ordered a bunch of food, including an entire meal of fried rice (which I think is an absolutely idiotically overpriced dish) as a leftover. I’m fine with having leftovers from a meal, but not an entire dish.
This type of frugality just seems absolutely ridiculous when I say it out loud. We’re not going out right now, but we knew each other before the pandemic and he knows I’ve had no trouble in the past spending a ton of money at the bar and I still don’t. I just worry that financially I am somehow a minefield and telling him this is just going to be so confusing. On top of it, this isn’t just a preference (it always has been), it’s a necessity because of my current financial situation, and frankly, he doesn’t make a ton of money, so I don’t know how this isn’t an issue for him either.
I just feel like an overbearing girlfriend by saying “Hey, I don’t want us to spend a ton of money eating out.” Am I overthinking this? Do I just need to be open about this? How do I say this without making him feel bad about how he likes to spend his money?
—Am I Being a Weirdo?
Advertisement
Dear Am I Being a Weirdo,
Part of the reason this column exists is because people have a hard time talking about money, but everyone needs to be comfortable doing it. I understand your anxiety about discussing it because you don’t want to be perceived as cheap or arbitrary in your logic by someone you love.
But it sounds as if you’re living together, and when you’re cohabitating, I think money conversations are necessary. (And this would be true even if he was just your roommate and you were sharing food expenses.)
I would begin the conversation by saying that you realize your spending might sometimes seem random, but there are just certain types of expenses that make you anxious, and you’d like to find a way to handle the question of food expenses in a way that doesn’t make him feel deprived, and doesn’t make you feel like you’re wasting money on food you don’t need or want. There are a lot of different potential solutions. One is that you create a joint food budget and stick to it. Another is that you pick up individual tabs in restaurants. Yet another is that you plan, at the beginning of the week, to figure out how much you want to spend and where. Regardless, the point is to come to some agreement about what you both feel comfortable spending.
This also requires that you be empathetic to his position. Even if your boyfriend doesn’t make a lot of money, it could be that not having to think too much about buying food, specifically, is what makes him feel secure and comfortable. I had some food insecurity my freshman year of college and, perhaps as a result, I’m more likely to spend on extra food than anything else, now that I’m relatively stable. Of course, your boyfriend may just not be thinking about the issue very much, but people’s spending priorities are often shaped by their history of feeling financially secure or not. And he may be forgoing expenses in other areas because food is important to him.
Advertisement
But you won’t know either way, unless you talk about it. You both need to be open about your anxieties around the issue so you understand and can sympathize with each other’s spending habits and can come to some compromise.
—E.S.
From: I’m Really Concerned About My Daughter’s Strange Financial Arrangement With Her Boyfriend. (January 27th, 2022).
More Advice From Slate
I have two very young children with severe developmental disabilities who will need lifelong care. My brother has seen them twice for a few hours each time and never calls or emails. Recently we redid our wills and had to decide who we wished to be guardians of our kids if something were to happen to both my husband and me. Because of the physical strength needed to care for the kids, we decided it wouldn’t be right to ask the grandparents to take that on when my husband and I each have a brother. My brother-in-law is a great guy and agreed to be first in line. But our attorney suggested we name a second guardian just in case.
Advertisement
Get the latest from Prudie and our columnists in your inbox each weekday, plus special bonus letters on Saturdays.
HOLYOKE — Amid a financial crisis in Holyoke, city Auditor Tanya Wdowiak gave her two weeks’ notice to the mayor and City Council president on Thursday.
Holyoke Mayor Joshua Garcia said Thursday that he received Wdowiak’s email resignation but hasn’t had a chance to talk with her.
Garcia said he came into the office to an email that requested he accept her formal resignation, effective Nov. 28.
If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.