Connect with us

Finance

Paris climate finance summit delivers momentum but few results

Published

on

Paris climate finance summit delivers momentum but few results

Developing nations called for a “transformation” of the world’s financial system at French President Emmanuel Macron’s Summit for a New Global Financing Pact. Western countries offered tweaks. 

However, the two-day summit — which sought to turbocharge reform efforts aimed at unlocking the trillions of dollars required to tackle climate change — did deliver a sense of growing momentum. 

Yet despite progress on some fronts, the Paris summit ended Friday barely having addressed the underlying problems preventing developing countries from investing in development and climate measures — in particular, their crushing debt levels. 

In her opening speech on Thursday, Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley, who co-hosted the summit alongside Macron, called on attendees to deliver a path to “transformation, not reform” of the global financial system. 

A sprinkling of announcements followed: The International Monetary Fund said it reached a target of making $100 billion in special drawing rights (SDRs), a reserve currency, available to climate-vulnerable countries; And the World Bank said developing nations hit by climate disasters would be able to suspend debt repayments. 

Advertisement

Rich countries announced a €2.5 billion clean energy agreement with Senegal and Zambia struck a deal to restructure $6.3 billion of its debt. A push for taxing shipping emissions also gained support. 

But Macron, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and the heads of financial institutions were met with an outpouring of frustration at Friday’s closing ceremony. 

“A number of the commitments that have been made have not really been fully lived up to,” said South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, referring to rich countries’ failure to deliver the promised $100 billion in annual climate finance by 2020 as one example. 

“Sometimes we’ll sit at conferences like this and say, ‘Yes, we will make this available and that available,’ and we believe you. We believe you, but now … we must now see action flowing from that,” he added. 

Macron — who said Friday that the overdue $100 billion pledge had now finally been met — responded by defending the summit. “We can’t say that we are not doing anything, it’s not true.”

Advertisement

The French team putting the summit together had framed it as a momentum- and confidence-building event. It was to be just one stop in a long journey to reconfiguring decades-old institutions that predated independence for many of the countries in attendance.

Macron proposed meeting again in Paris in two years at the latest and setting up a monitoring mechanism to ensure promises are kept, while warning against “engaging in repetitive indignation” about the lack of progress at summit after summit. 

Avoiding the debt debate

In recent years, as conflicts over money increasingly held up progress at global climate summits and the pandemic threw global inequalities into stark relief, Western countries have shown a greater willingness to budge on finance issues. 

But current efforts fall far short of the needs of developing countries, which require an estimated $2.4 trillion a year to reduce emissions and deal with climate impacts, according to a report commissioned by the U.K. and Egypt ahead of COP27.

Macron’s summit, many hoped, would set the tone for meaningful progress on climate finance ahead of this year’s COP28 climate conference in Dubai. 

Advertisement

The forward movement on disaster debt suspension clauses, reallocation of SDRs and discussions around global taxes was welcomed by attendees. Rich countries, however, barely engaged with the Global South’s key demands on debt relief and new financing. 

Major World Bank shareholders like the U.S. emphasized making institutions more efficient and stretching their lending before pouring in new capital. Any recapitalization would also potentially involve ratcheting up voting representation for China, something many G7 countries would rather avoid.

During a panel on Thursday evening, Mottley called out Western countries — and Europeans in particular — on debt. 

The EU’s Maastricht Treaty, Mottley noted, sets a debt-to-GDP ratio limit of 60 percent. “The hypocrisy of the moment … is found in the fact that almost every country in Europe is now facing debt-to-GDP ratios of over 90 percent,” she said. 

“The U.K. took 100 years to repay its debt for WWI. And Germany had all the benefits of having its debt service capped … to rebuild Germany after WWII,” she added. “We are people too. We are countries too. And we deserve similar treatment.”

Advertisement

A ‘sense of hope’

In Friday’s closing ceremony, Zambian President Hakainde Hichilema thanked countries and creditors for making his country’s debt restructuring deal possible. 

But, he said, the agreement had taken too long to hammer out, criticizing “the speed at which we do things … Every day we don’t deliver these things we are basically increasing the costs.” 

Brazil’s Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva used his closing speech to hit out at the setup of global institutions like the World Bank, the IMF, the United Nations and the World Trade Organization, decrying the “return of protectionism” and unequal trade agreements. 

“If we don’t change our institutions, the world will remain the same,” he said. “And the rich will go on being rich, and the poor will go on being poor.” 

Still, many attendees left Paris on Friday with a sense of optimism. Marshall Islands envoy Albon Ishoda said the summit had “renewed a sense of urgency and hope for many of us.”

Advertisement

France on Friday evening published a roadmap setting out the way forward up until mid-2024, alongside a chair’s summary.

That investing flows, borrowing rates and the international financial architecture have become so ingrained in the climate conversation underscores progress in addressing the needs that emerging and climate-vulnerable countries have pointed out for years.

“It says something really important,” said Alex Michie, head of the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net-Zero, an investor-led pact seeking to drive private capital into clean energy. “It now basically has become mainstream.”

Avinash Persaud, Mottley’s climate envoy, told reporters after the summit ended that he saw Paris as an “important inflection point.” 

He added: “Nine months ago, if I’d said to you that there will be widespread adoption of disaster debt clauses … you’d be saying, what are you smoking?”

Advertisement

Clea Caulcutt and Giorgio Leali contributed reporting from Paris.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

US SEC obtained record financial remedies in fiscal 2024, agency says

Published

on

US SEC obtained record financial remedies in fiscal 2024, agency says

NEW YORK (Reuters) -The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission obtained $8.2 billion in financial remedies, the highest amount in its history, in fiscal 2024, the agency said in a statement on Friday.

The SEC filed 583 enforcement actions in the year that ended in September, down 26% from a year earlier, it said in a statement.

The $8.2 billion in financial remedies included $6.1 billion in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, a record, and $2.1 billion in civil penalties, the second-highest amount on record, according to the SEC’s statement.

Much of the total financial remedies came from a single action: a $4.5 billion settlement with the now-bankrupt crypto firm Terraform Labs, following a unanimous jury verdict against the firm and its founder Do Kwon. The SEC is expected to collect little of that settlement amount because it agreed to be paid only after Terraform satisfies crypto loss claims as part of its bankruptcy wind-down.

The SEC also obtained orders barring 124 individuals from serving as officers and directors of public companies, the second-highest number of such prohibitions in a decade. Holding individuals accountable for misconduct has been a priority of the agency under Chair Gary Gensler, who is stepping down in January.

Advertisement

“The Division of Enforcement is a steadfast cop on the beat, following the facts and the law wherever they lead to hold wrongdoers accountable,” Gensler said in a statement about the agency’s 2024 enforcement results.

(Reporting by Chris Prentice; Editing by Leslie Adler and Jonathan Oatis)

Continue Reading

Finance

Cop29: $250bn climate finance offer from rich world an insult, critics say

Published

on

Cop29: 0bn climate finance offer from rich world an insult, critics say

Developing countries have reacted angrily to an offer of $250bn in finance from the rich world – considerably less than they are demanding – to help them tackle the climate crisis.

The offer was contained in the draft text of an agreement published on Friday afternoon at the Cop29 climate summit in Azerbaijan, where talks are likely to carry on past a 6pm deadline.

Juan Carlos Monterrey Gómez, Panama’s climate envoy, told the Guardian: “This is definitely not enough. What we need is at least $5tn a year, but what we have asked for is just $1.3tn. That is 1% of global GDP. That should not be too much when you’re talking about saving the planet we all live on.”

He said $250bn divided among all the developing countries in need amounted to very little. “It comes to nothing when you split it. We have bills in the billions to pay after droughts and flooding. What the heck will $250bn do? It won’t put us on a path to 1.5C. More like 3C.”

According to the new text of a deal, developing countries would receive a total of at least $1.3tn a year in climate finance by 2035, which is in line with the demands most submitted before this two-week conference. That would be made up of the $250bn from developed countries, plus other sources of finance including private investment.

Advertisement

Poor nations wanted much more of the headline finance to come directly from rich countries, preferably in the form of grants rather than loans.

Civil society groups criticised the offer, variously describing it as “a joke”, “an embarrassment”, “an insult”, and the global north “playing poker with people’s lives”.

Mohamed Adow, a co-founder of Power Shift Africa, a thinktank, said: “Our expectations were low, but this is a slap in the face. No developing country will fall for this. It’s not clear what kind of trick the presidency is trying to pull. They’ve already disappointed everyone, but they have now angered and offended the developing world.”

The $250bn figure is significantly lower than the $300bn-a-year offer that some developed countries were mulling at the talks, to the Guardian’s knowledge.

The offer from developed countries, funded from their national budgets and overseas aid, is supposed to form the inner core of a “layered” finance settlement, accompanied by a middle layer of new forms of finance such as new taxes on fossil fuels and high-carbon activities, carbon trading and “innovative” forms of finance; and an outermost layer of investment from the private sector, into projects such as solar and windfarms.

Advertisement

These layers would add up to $1.3tn a year, which is the amount that economists have calculated is needed in external finance for developing countries to tackle the climate crisis. Many activists have demanded more: figures of $5tn or $7tn a year have been put forward by some groups, based on the historical responsibilities of developed countries for causing the climate crisis.

skip past newsletter promotion

This latest text is the second from an increasingly embattled Cop presidency. Azerbaijan was widely criticised for its first draft on Thursday.

Advertisement

There will now be further negotiations among countries and possibly a new or several new iterations of this draft text.

Avinash Persaud, a former adviser to the Barbados prime minister, Mia Mottley, and now an adviser to the president of the Inter-American Bank, said: “There is no deal to come out of Baku that will not leave a bad taste in everyone’s mouth, but we are within sight of a landing zone for the first time all year.”

Continue Reading

Finance

US Treasury Selects BNY as Financial Agent for Direct Express Program | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

US Treasury Selects BNY as Financial Agent for Direct Express Program | PYMNTS.com

The Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) will serve as the financial agent for the Direct Express program, which provides 3.4 million Americans with a prepaid debit card to receive monthly federal benefits.

The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service said in a Thursday (Nov. 21) press release that it selected BNY for this role after evaluating proposals from multiple financial institutions and seeing the bank’s offering of features and customer service options.

The new agreement will begin Jan. 3 and will last five years, according to the release.

“Since 2008, the Direct Express program has paid federal beneficiaries seamlessly, inclusively and securely, while sparing taxpayers and customers the costs and risk associated with cashing paper checks,Fiscal Service Commissioner Tim Gribben said in the release.This new agreement will further our goals of delivering a modern customer experience and strengthening Treasury’s commitment to paying the right person, in the right amount, at the right time.”

With this agreement, BNY will add to the cardholder experience features like online/digital funds access, bill pay, cardless ATM access, omnichannel chat and text customer service, online dispute filing and in-person authentication options, the bank said in a Thursday press release.

Advertisement

“Drawing on our leading platform capabilities, we look forward to advancing the program’s goal of providing high-quality financial services to individuals and communities throughout the U.S.,Jennifer Barker, global head of treasury services and depositary receipts at BNY, said in the release.

Seventy-seven percent of the recipients of disbursements opt for instant payments when given the option, according to the PYMNTS Intelligence and Ingo Payments collaboration,Measuring Consumers’ Growing Interest in Instant Payouts.”

That’s because consumers looking for disbursements — paychecks, government payments, insurance settlements, investment earnings — want their money quickly, the report found.

In October, the Treasury Department credited the Office of Payment Integrity, within the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, with enhancing its fraud prevention capabilities and expanding offerings to new and existing customers.

The department said itstechnology and data-driven” approach allowed it to prevent and recover more than $4 billion in fraud and improper payments, up from $652 million in 2023.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending