Connect with us

Finance

Issuing bonds to tackle Hong Kong deficit not ‘monstrous’: ex-minister Henry Tang

Published

on

Issuing bonds to tackle Hong Kong deficit not ‘monstrous’: ex-minister Henry Tang

Hong Kong’s plan to issue bonds to tackle a dire deficit is not “monstrous” but rather a legitimate short- to medium-term solution to improve capital flow, former finance minister Henry Tang Ying-yen has said.

Tang on Tuesday defended the government’s plan, which Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po announced in his budget blueprint, after his successor, John Tsang Chun-wah, warned the measure could affect the city’s credit ratings.

According to Chan’s budget speech last week, Hong Kong planned to issue HK$120 billion (US$15.3 billion) in silver, green and infrastructure bonds to cover the government’s recurring expenses. He remained confident that the city would balance the books within three years.

Financial Secretary Paul Chan announced in his budget blueprint a plan to issue HK$120 billion in bonds. Photo: Elson Li

Tsang, the longest-serving financial secretary from 2007 to 2017, earlier said in a social media post that the city needed to look beyond bond issuances to cover government spending. He also argued the government had “undeniably fallen into an era of structural deficit”.

Speaking in Beijing as a member of the Standing Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), Tang, who was the financial secretary before Tsang, called the plan “completely legitimate” as long as there was market demand.

Advertisement

“Bond issuance for the purpose of maintaining government operations is not monstrous,” Tang said.

“It is acceptable if it is used to strengthen capital flow, and raise funds in the short and medium term when the capital chain is broken.”

Hong Kong’s West Kowloon arts hub funding crisis ‘threatens to halt event deals’

Hong Kong’s budget deficit is expected to balloon to HK$101.6 billion for the current financial year ending in March, almost double last year’s forecast given by the government. Chan said more borrowing would enable the government to maintain cash flow to finance major projects, such as the Northern Metropolis.

Tang, who served as finance chief from 2003 to 2007, ducked a question on whether Hong Kong had already plunged into a structural deficit as Tsang argued.

Advertisement

But he stressed that Chan had a duty to follow the principle stipulated in the Basic Law, the city’s mini-constitution, that the government needed to avoid deficits and keep expenditure within the limits of revenues.

“If you can be candid to citizens [about the dire financial situation], they can feel your respect and understand the rationale of the measures amid the challenges,” he said, referring to the city’s property downturn and soaring recurring expenditure.

Former finance minister Henry Tang has also expressed support for the city’s coming national security legislation. Photo: Natalie Wong

Tang said that back in 2004 when he proposed issuing HK$20 billion in bonds, bankers described it as “a museum piece” as it was a rarely used tool then to solve the deficit problem.

Following measures to lure mainland Chinese tourists and launch renminbi business that year, he posted the city’s first budget surplus in five years in 2005.

Tang argued that Hong Kong was on the right track to revive its economy by finding new engines in technology and deepening cross-border integration.

Tsang’s remarks on the budget measures triggered heated debate on social media. He said that amid the high-interest rate environment, government bonds might not be as attractive to buyers as depositing their money in banks to secure higher rates of return.

Advertisement

30,000 yuan in duty-free? Hong Kong CPPCC members want new cap for mainland visitors

He also worried that the city would eventually need to pay the debt’s interest expenses, which could affect its credit ratings, as well as saddle future generations with higher taxes and fewer public services.

On Monday, Tang also expressed support for the city’s coming national security legislation, a requirement under Article 23 of the city’s mini-constitution.

“Without stability, it’s hard to talk about economic development and livelihood improvements,” he said.

He added that countries, including Singapore, had been strengthening their own security legislation, urging the proposed law should be utilised effectively to gain investors’ confidence.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Dividend Stability and Regional Strength: The Case for Truist Financial (TFC)

Published

on

Dividend Stability and Regional Strength: The Case for Truist Financial (TFC)

Truist Financial Corporation (NYSE:TFC) is included among the 11 Best Bank Dividend Stocks to Buy.

Dividend Stability and Regional Strength: The Case for Truist Financial (TFC)

Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

Truist Financial Corporation (NYSE:TFC) is a prominent American commercial bank with a strong footprint in the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic regions. Ranking among the top ten banks in the country, it enjoys a solid market position in high-growth states like Florida and Georgia. Recently, the bank has prioritized digital innovation and technology development to improve service delivery and remain competitive against fintech firms.

Regulatory compliance remains a key focus for Truist Financial Corporation (NYSE:TFC), as it operates under enhanced prudential standards and capital requirements as a Category III banking organization. Adhering to these standards is essential for sustaining its operations and long-term strategies. At the same time, Truist’s disciplined approach to capital management allows it to maintain financial stability while pursuing strategic growth opportunities, including potential mergers and acquisitions.

Truist Financial Corporation (NYSE:TFC) is also popular among investors because of its dividend policy. The company has been making regular payments to shareholders since 1997. Currently, it offers a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.53%, as of September 24.

Advertisement

While we acknowledge the potential of TFC as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you’re looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.

EAD NEXT: 12 Best Stocks to Buy Now for Passive Income and 12 Best Retail Dividend Stocks to Buy Now

Disclosure: None.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Financing opportunity: Q&A with Harold Pettigrew on the future of the CDFI Sector – Kresge Foundation

Published

on

Financing opportunity: Q&A with Harold Pettigrew on the future of the CDFI Sector – Kresge Foundation

As the community finance field enters a new era—shaped by economic uncertainty, shifting capital flows, and growing calls for accountability—how can CDFIs prepare for what’s ahead? The Kresge Foundation spoke with Harold Pettigrew, the president and CEO of the Opportunity Finance Network (OFN) to help answer that questionThis article is part of a series highlighting the impact of CDFIs and how the sector is adapting to the current environment. 

MD: CDFIs play a unique role in our financial ecosystem, often serving communities that mainstream banks overlook. Why are CDFIs so critical for advancing economic growth and creating opportunities in underserved communities?

HP: In every corner of America, CDFIs show that impact and financial performance aren’t at odds—they reinforce each other. We address market gaps and go where traditional capital doesn’t: listening first, solving for need, and providing capital to people and financing projects that strengthen families and communities. Whether it’s a small business on Main Street or a housing development in a rural town, CDFIs make investments that build wealth and create opportunities that reach people and communities that need it most. 

MD: CDFIs seem to have broad support in Congress, even when some administrations have looked to reduce funding or support. Is bipartisan support materially different today? What role has OFN played in telling the CDFI story and maintaining that support?

HP: Bipartisan support for CDFIs remains strong because our work cuts across political divides — we’re about creating jobs, building businesses and revitalizing communities. What’s different today is the urgency and scale of the need, and the growing recognition that CDFIs are essential partners in solving some of our nation’s toughest challenges. OFN and CDFIs tell real stories of impact—stories of people across the country whose lives and livelihoods have changed thanks to the capital provided by CDFIs. Through advocacy, research, and direct engagement with policymakers, we’ve elevated a clear, consistent message: For over 30 years, CDFIs have delivered results addressing market gaps in providing access to capital to communities across the country.  

MD: Beyond federal funding concerns, what are the current challenges and needs CDFIs are facing in their day-to-day efforts to support communities?

HP: CDFIs are navigating a complex economic environment— rising interest rates, tighter capital markets, and growing community needs are stretching our resources like never before. Many CDFIs are being asked to do more with less, while also investing in their own operations to scale effectively and sustainably. OFN is working to develop diverse pools of flexible capital, make deeper investments in talent and technology, and new policy frameworks that support and recognize the unique value CDFIs bring. The demand is clear —  what’s needed now is bold investments to meet the moment and craft new solutions for the future. 

MD: Philanthropies and community development departments of banks and insurance companies have always been crucial partners for CDFIs — how can they best support and invest in CDFIs right now?

HP: Our partners in philanthropy and financial services have been critical to the success of CDFIs, and now they have a critical opportunity to strengthen the CDFI industry for the future. That means moving beyond transactional grantmaking to long-term, trust-based partnerships. It means offering flexible, risk-tolerant capital that lets CDFIs innovate and expand, and it means investing in the infrastructure — people, systems, data — that helps us operate at scale.

Advertisement
MD: What keeps you optimistic about the future of the CDFI sector?

HP: What keeps me optimistic is the impact and commitment I see every day, from the entrepreneurs we finance, to the communities we serve, to the CDFI leaders innovating with courage and conviction. The sector is growing, diversifying and deepening its impact. We’re not just responding to the moment — we’re helping define the future of expanded access to finance and financial services. And with every new loan, every new partnership, every life changed, we’re proving that when we expand access to opportunity — we don’t just finance projects, we shape the future of communities across the country.  

Harold Pettigrew is the President and CEO of Opportunity Finance Network (OFN) 

Continue Reading

Finance

Reimagining Finance: Derek Kudsee on Coda’s AI-Powered Future

Published

on

Reimagining Finance: Derek Kudsee on Coda’s AI-Powered Future

Derek Kudsee is a veteran of the enterprise software industry, with senior leadership roles at industry giants such as SAP, Salesforce, and Microsoft under his belt. So, when he took the helm as the new Managing Director for Unit4 Financials by Coda, ERP Today sat down with Kudsee to discuss his vision for Coda, the promise of agentic AI to make work feel lighter for finance teams, and his mission to transform the classic system of record into a dynamic system of intelligence for the Office of the CFO.

What was it about the opportunity at Unit4, and specifically the challenge of modernizing Coda, that convinced you to take this role? 

A rare combination of having a deeply trusted platform and a clear opportunity to reimagine the finance function drew me to Unit4, and specifically the Coda business. Some of the largest enterprise customers have been running on this platform for decades. I’ve been brought in to help these finance teams run more efficiently and provide greater insight through agent-driven automation. We live in a world where technology has converged in our consumer and professional lives. Therefore, modernization is not only about addressing complex systems, but also about enhancing the user experience. This combination of running a deeply trusted platform, reimagining its capabilities in an AI-driven world, and modernizing the user experience was attractive. 

Unit4 Financials by Coda’s goal is to deliver an “AI-fueled office for the CFO” using agentic AI. How will a finance team using Coda experience this in their day-to-day work? 

When one thinks of an AI-fueled Office of the CFO, it’s about having agents deep inside those finance processes that will suggest, explain, and act within guardrails that finance teams can set. The work should feel like the machine is performing tasks that were previously done manually or laboriously. 

Advertisement

A simple example is in an accounts payable department. An agent can automate everything from invoice capture using AI-driven OCR, verify that the invoices are within policy, queue them for approval, send them to the respective individuals, and flag exceptions along the way. Users can see how the work feels lighter because the machine handles everything from capture to the final stage, including payment release. 

How do the AI functionalities offered by Coda differ from what competitors are offering right now? 

Many vendors today have a finance module. However, we aim to be the best standalone financial management system, not a generic suite. We’re not trying to be finance because we want to sell an HR or CRM system. That means we need to embed intelligence deeply within the finance processes so that the software acts, takes action, and performs activities for the finance function. For that, the agentic AI needs to operate with autonomy, understand financial context, and learn from user behavior. 

Moreover, fundamentally, Coda has always been built on a unified financial model. We’ve never had Accounts Payable separate from Accounts Receivable that needed to be consolidated. Our AI works on clean, structured data from day one, and that’s the foundation for accuracy. We don’t need to chase hype to incorporate AI. We’re going to redefine the finance function with AI at its core. 

How do you plan to balance the introduction of these cutting-edge innovations without disrupting the core stability that Coda is known for? 

Advertisement

The safest way to modernize finance is to add certainty around the core, rather than disrupting it. Our core is why customers have been running Coda for 20-30 years. Thus, stability is not a nice-to-have; it’s non-negotiable. Our customers run mission-critical processes, and that trust is sacred to us. Therefore, every innovation we deliver, whether it’s UX modernization or AI, will be built on one simple principle: if it compromises stability, we don’t build it. We don’t ship it. 

With that rock-solid foundation in place, we can layer intelligence and usability on top. While some software providers are still determining the stability of their platform, we can offer customers the best of both worlds. They’ll have the reliability they’ve counted on for decades, and now we bring them the innovation they need to stay ahead. 

What This Means for ERP Insiders 

Your biggest enemy is decision latency. According to Kudsee, the primary challenge for modern finance is the gap between a business event occurring and the ability to respond intelligently. This decision latency, caused by fragmented data, batch processes, and manual workarounds that are standard in traditional ERP environments, prevents finance from being a proactive and strategic partner. Coda’s goal is to shrink that gap from weeks or days to near-real-time. 

Shift the ERP mindset from system of record to system of intelligence. For decades, the primary function of ERP finance modules has been to record transactions accurately. This is no longer sufficient, as Kudsee notes. A modern financial platform must function as a system of intelligence that not only records data but also analyzes, predicts, and automates actions within core financial processes, effectively acting as the intelligent brain of the CFO’s office. 

Advertisement

Prioritize financial depth over suite breadth. Kudsee suggests that the single ERP for everything strategy can result in a finance module that is a jack-of-all-trades but master of none. The alternative approach is to prioritize depth and best-in-class functionality for the critical finance function. Instead of settling for the generic finance module within a larger suite, consider how a dedicated platform like Unit4 Financials for Coda, focused on deep financial control, insight, and automation, can deliver more agility and tackle core challenges, such as decision latency, more effectively. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending