Connect with us

Finance

How Budget 2024 Reforms Shape Your Personal Finance – Forbes India Blogs

Published

on

How Budget 2024 Reforms Shape Your Personal Finance – Forbes India Blogs

Image: Shutterstock

Budget Day is always a momentous occasion, sparking keen interest as we dissect its implications on our finances. While the certainty of taxes is something we all face, our primary concern is often how these changes impact our take-home pay, particularly for salaried individuals. Let’s break down this year’s Budget and see what it means for you.

As we adapt to these updates, keep your focus on what you can control: your personal growth and income. Investing in yourself and working to enhance your earnings can make a significant difference. Although taxes are a constant, steering your financial future lies in your hands.

Changes in your tax slab:

The Budget has revised the tax slabs in the new tax regime to enhance its appeal to taxpayers. Under this regime, the standard deduction is proposed to increase from ₹50,000 to ₹75,000.

Pay No Tax on an Income of up to ₹7.75 Lakh

Advertisement

The recent changes in tax slabs will result in significant savings for lower and middle-income groups, while those in higher-income brackets will see minimal impact. These adjustments allow salaried employees in the new tax regime to save up to ₹17,500 in income tax.

The higher standard deduction of ₹75,000 means that anyone with an annual income of ₹7.75 lakh will not have to pay any tax. Additionally, under the new regime, taxpayers with an annual income of up to ₹7 lakh are eligible for a full tax rebate under Section 87A.

This is the second change in the new tax regime’s slab structure in as many years. Last year’s Budget reduced the number of slabs from seven to six and extended the standard deduction to the new regime. Let me explain:

shutterstock_717032236_SM

Improved Financial Stability for Pensioners

The Budget 2024 proposes increasing the family pension deduction from ₹15,000 to ₹25,000, providing greater financial stability for pensioners. Meanwhile, taxpayers who prefer the old tax regime will see no changes in their tax liabilities, as no updates were announced for that system.

Simplification of capital gains on real estate transactions:

The Budget 2024 has removed the indexation benefit for property sales, changing how capital gains are calculated. Previously, sellers could adjust their purchase price for inflation, reducing their taxable gains, and were taxed at 20 Percent on long-term capital gains (LTCG). Now, the LTCG tax rate is reduced to 12.5 percent, but without the inflation adjustment.

Advertisement

Here is an example to illustrate this change:

Mr. A bought a property for ₹50 lakh in FY 2004-2005. He sells the property in FY 2023-2024 for ₹1.5 crore. Under the previous rules, the purchase price of ₹50 lakh would be adjusted for inflation using the Cost Inflation Index (CII) numbers provided by the Income Tax Department. However, under the new rules, there will be no adjustment for inflation. The capital gains will be calculated by directly subtracting the purchase price from the sale price. Although the good news is that the LTCG tax rate has been reduced from 20 percent to 12.5 percent, the lack of indexation requires careful calculation to determine the actual tax impact.

Also Read- Budget 2024: Higher taxes for markets investors, F&O clampdown

The objective is to simplify capital gains taxation by reducing the LTCG tax rate to 12.5 percent and removing the indexation benefit. This change is intended to make capital gains calculations easier for both taxpayers and tax authorities.

How the Indexation Removal Affects Real Estate Investors

The elimination of indexation benefits poses a challenge for long-term real estate investors. Without this adjustment, taxable capital gains are likely to rise, increasing the tax burden on property sales. This could reduce net profits and potentially deter investment in real estate, especially for those who have held properties for an extended period where inflation has had a greater impact.

Advertisement

New Tax Relief for Multiple Properties and Short-Term Rentals

Under the new tax rules, individuals can now designate up to two properties as self-occupied. This change is advantageous for homeowners with multiple properties or those renting out homes on short-term platforms like Airbnb, providing relief and simplifying tax management.

Increased Long-Term Capital Gains Tax on financial assets

The long-term capital gains tax (LTCG) has been raised from 10 percent to 12.5 percent across all financial and non-financial assets. Short-term capital gains (STCG) on specific assets will now be taxed at 20 percent. The exemption limit for LTCG has also increased from ₹1 lakh to ₹1.25 lakh. The Budget clarifies that listed financial assets held for over a year will be deemed long-term, while unlisted financial assets and non-financial assets must be held for at least two years to qualify.

Also Read- Budget 2024 is a quest for equitable growth: CRISIL

I see these changes may create concerns about potential future tax increases, but it’s essential to remember that equity gains could offset some of these taxes. Equity mutual funds remain a compelling investment option. As I always say, “Death and taxes are certain,” so focusing on increasing income and controlling what you can is key.

shutterstock_717032236_SM

 

Budget 2024 Highlights: STT Hike and NPS Enhancements

STT Increase for Futures and Options:

Advertisement

Futures and Options (F&O) traders will face a significant tax increase as the Security Transaction Tax (STT) rises from 0.01 percent to 0.02 percent. This adjustment will effectively double the tax on equity and index trades.

Boost in NPS Tax Deductions:

The deduction limit for employer contributions to the New Pension Scheme (NPS) is set to rise from 10 percent to 14 percent. This enhancement will benefit both public and private sector employees, aligning their tax advantages with those of government employees.

Introduction of NPS Vatsalya for Minors:

The new NPS Vatsalya scheme allows parents to contribute to a minor’s NPS account, which will convert to a regular NPS plan upon the child’s 18th birthday. This scheme fosters early financial discipline and seamlessly transitions to a standard NPS plan.

Advertisement

Changes to Buyback Taxation and Reporting Requirements

Buybacks Taxed as Dividends:

Starting October 1, buybacks will be taxed as dividend income, significantly reducing their appeal to investors. This proposal may alter investment strategies, making buybacks less attractive compared to before.

Relaxed Penalties for Foreign Assets:

The Budget introduces a relaxation in penalties for not reporting foreign assets up to ₹20 lakh. This change aims to ease the burden on small taxpayers who may have inadvertently overlooked reporting overseas assets.

Eased TDS for Salaried Employees:

Advertisement

From October 1, salaried employees will benefit from reduced Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) as they can now declare Tax Collected at Source (TCS) to their employers. This update will help manage cash flow better and allow any refunds due to be adjusted directly against TDS.

These changes bring both challenges and opportunities. The shift in buyback taxation may prompt investors to reconsider their strategies, while relaxed penalties and adjusted TDS rules offer significant relief to taxpayers. It’s crucial to stay informed and adapt to these updates to optimise your financial planning.

The writer is a Chartered Accountant and founder of NRP Capitals.

The thoughts and opinions shared here are of the author.

Check out our end of season subscription discounts with a Moneycontrol pro subscription absolutely free. Use code EOSO2021. Click here for details.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Cornell Administrator Warren Petrofsky Named FAS Finance Dean | News | The Harvard Crimson

Published

on

Cornell Administrator Warren Petrofsky Named FAS Finance Dean | News | The Harvard Crimson

Cornell University administrator Warren Petrofsky will serve as the Faculty of Arts and Sciences’ new dean of administration and finance, charged with spearheading efforts to shore up the school’s finances as it faces a hefty budget deficit.

Petrofsky’s appointment, announced in a Friday email from FAS Dean Hopi E. Hoekstra to FAS affiliates, will begin April 20 — nearly a year after former FAS dean of administration and finance Scott A. Jordan stepped down. Petrofsky will replace interim dean Mary Ann Bradley, who helped shape the early stages of FAS cost-cutting initiatives.

Petrofsky currently serves as associate dean of administration at Cornell University’s College of Arts and Sciences.

As dean, he oversaw a budget cut of nearly $11 million to the institution’s College of Arts and Sciences after the federal government slashed at least $250 million in stop-work orders and frozen grants, according to the Cornell Daily Sun.

He also serves on a work group established in November 2025 to streamline the school’s administrative systems.

Advertisement

Earlier, at the University of Pennsylvania, Petrofsky managed capital initiatives and organizational redesigns in a number of administrative roles.

Petrofsky is poised to lead similar efforts at the FAS, which relaunched its Resources Committee in spring 2025 and created a committee to consolidate staff positions amid massive federal funding cuts.

As part of its planning process, the committee has quietly brought on external help. Over several months, consultants from McKinsey & Company have been interviewing dozens of administrators and staff across the FAS.

Petrofsky will also likely have a hand in other cost-cutting measures across the FAS, which is facing a $365 million budget deficit. The school has already announced it will keep spending flat for the 2026 fiscal year, and it has dramatically reduced Ph.D. admissions.

In her email, Hoekstra praised Petrofsky’s performance across his career.

Advertisement

“Warren has emphasized transparency, clarity in communication, and investment in staff development,” she wrote. “He approaches change with steadiness and purpose, and with deep respect for the mission that unites our faculty, researchers, staff, and students. I am confident that he will be a strong partner to me and to our community.”

—Staff writer Amann S. Mahajan can be reached at [email protected] and on Signal at amannsm.38. Follow her on X @amannmahajan.

Continue Reading

Finance

Where in California are people feeling the most financial distress?

Published

on

Where in California are people feeling the most financial distress?

Inland California’s relative affordability cannot always relieve financial stress.

My spreadsheet reviewed a WalletHub ranking of financial distress for the residents of 100 U.S. cities, including 17 in California. The analysis compared local credit scores, late bill payments, bankruptcy filings and online searches for debt or loans to quantify where individuals had the largest money challenges.

When California cities were divided into three geographic regions – Southern California, the Bay Area, and anything inland – the most challenges were often found far from the coast.

The average national ranking of the six inland cities was 39th worst for distress, the most troubled grade among the state’s slices.

Bakersfield received the inland region’s worst score, ranking No. 24 highest nationally for financial distress. That was followed by Sacramento (30th), San Bernardino (39th), Stockton (43rd), Fresno (45th), and Riverside (52nd).

Advertisement

Southern California’s seven cities overall fared better, with an average national ranking of 56th largest financial problems.

However, Los Angeles had the state’s ugliest grade, ranking fifth-worst nationally for monetary distress. Then came San Diego at 22nd-worst, then Long Beach (48th), Irvine (70th), Anaheim (71st), Santa Ana (85th), and Chula Vista (89th).

Monetary challenges were limited in the Bay Area. Its four cities average rank was 69th worst nationally.

San Jose had the region’s most distressed finances, with a No. 50 worst ranking. That was followed by Oakland (69th), San Francisco (72nd), and Fremont (83rd).

The results remind us that inland California’s affordability – it’s home to the state’s cheapest housing, for example – doesn’t fully compensate for wages that typically decline the farther one works from the Pacific Ocean.

Advertisement

A peek inside the scorecard’s grades shows where trouble exists within California.

Credit scores were the lowest inland, with little difference elsewhere. Late payments were also more common inland. Tardy bills were most difficult to find in Northern California.

Bankruptcy problems also were bubbling inland, but grew the slowest in Southern California. And worrisome online searches were more frequent inland, while varying only slightly closer to the Pacific.

Note: Across the state’s 17 cities in the study, the No. 53 average rank is a middle-of-the-pack grade on the 100-city national scale for monetary woes.

Jonathan Lansner is the business columnist for the Southern California News Group. He can be reached at jlansner@scng.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Why Chime Financial Stock Surged Nearly 14% Higher Today | The Motley Fool

Published

on

Why Chime Financial Stock Surged Nearly 14% Higher Today | The Motley Fool

The up-and-coming fintech scored a pair of fourth-quarter beats.

Diversified fintech Chime Financial (CHYM +12.88%) was playing a satisfying tune to investors on Thursday. The company’s stock flew almost 14% higher that trading session, thanks mostly to a fourth quarter that featured notably higher-than-expected revenue guidance.

Sweet music

Chime published its fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 results just after market close on Wednesday. For the former period, the company’s revenue was $596 million, bettering the same quarter of 2024 by 25%. The company’s strongest revenue stream, payments, rose 17% to $396 million. Its take from platform-related activity rose more precipitously, advancing 47% to $200 million.

Image source: Getty Images.

Meanwhile, Chime’s net loss under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) more than doubled. It was $45 million, or $0.12 per share, compared with a fourth-quarter 2024 deficit of $19.6 million.

Advertisement

On average, analysts tracking the stock were modeling revenue below $578 million and a deeper bottom-line loss of $0.20 per share.

In its earnings release, Chime pointed to the take-up of its Chime Card as a particular catalyst for growth. Regarding the product, the company said, “Among new member cohorts, over half are adopting Chime Card, and those members are putting over 70% of their Chime spend on the product, which earns materially higher take rates compared to debit.”

Chime Financial Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(12.88%) $2.72

Current Price

$23.83

Advertisement

Double-digit growth expected

Chime management proffered revenue and non-GAAP (adjusted) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) guidance for full-year 2026. The company expects to post a top line of $627 million to $637 million, which would represent at least 21% growth over the 2024 result. Adjusted EBITDA should be $380 million to $400 million. No net income forecasts were provided in the earnings release.

It isn’t easy to find a niche in the financial industry, which is crowded with companies offering every imaginable type of service to clients. Yet Chime seems to be achieving that, as the Chime Card is clearly a hit among the company’s target demographic of clientele underserved by mainstream banks. This growth stock is definitely worth considering as a buy.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending