Finance
Blended finance and female entrepreneurs
Female entrepreneurs often encounter greater challenges in securing funding compared to their male counterparts (Klapper and Parker 2011, Nanda and Howell, 2020). This disparity can be attributed to various factors, including biased loan officers (Alesina 2008, Brock and De Haas 2023), restrictive gender norms, and discriminatory legal arrangements. The resulting frictions may impede the growth and productivity of businesses run by women. Several countries have therefore initiated blended finance programmes for female entrepreneurs, with the goal of creating a more equitable financial landscape.
In a typical blended finance programme, a development finance institution provides private banks with loans containing a use-of-proceeds clause. These banks then pool (‘blend’) this public finance with commercial funding of their own, and on-lend the combined funds to the type of borrowers specified in the use-of-proceeds clause. Two other elements are common. The first is technical assistance to banks, such as for staff training and IT upgrading. The second is risk sharing via a partial credit guarantee by the development finance institution or a third party.
Recent examples of blended finance programs for female entrepreneurs include the Women Entrepreneurs Opportunity Facility by the International Finance Corporation (IFC) (US$4.5 billion); the Banking on Women programme, also by the IFC ($3 billion); the Affirmative Finance Action for Women in Africa by the African Development Bank ($1.3 billion); the SheInvest programme by the European Investment Bank ($2 billion); and the Women Entrepreneurship Banking programme by the Inter-American Development Bank ($0.8 billion).
The Women in Business programme
In a recent paper (Aydin et al. 2024), we aim to establish whether and how blended finance programmes help targeted firms to borrow and grow. Our focus is on the Women in Business (WIB) programme for female entrepreneurs in Türkiye. This programme was rolled out through five Turkish banks during 2014–2019 with the goal of stimulating these banks to lend more to women-run small businesses. The programme comprised three components: public credit lines to five banks for a total of €300 million, a risk-mitigation mechanism in the form of a first-loss risk cover (FLRC) that guaranteed up to 10% of each participating bank’s portfolio, and technical assistance. The latter involved tailored consultancy packages that included classroom training on gender-responsive sales, online training for loan officers on gender awareness and overcoming behavioural constraints, and support in developing new financial products and procedures that cater to women entrepreneurs.
Banks had to blend the credit lines with their own funding and, by the end of 2017, a total of €417 million had been disbursed to more than 12,000 female-run small businesses. Figure 1 shows the district-level market shares of the participant banks as measured by their branch presence in 2014.
Figure 1 Pre-programme market share of branches operated by treated banks
Notes: This district-level map of Turkey shows for each district the share of bank branches that are operated by treated banks as of end-2014.
Because banks received the programme funding at different points in time, they started to disburse sub-loans at different times as well. The vertical red lines in Figure 2 indicate these staggered start dates, a feature that we exploit to measure programme impact. The graph also shows a gradual and partial closing of the gap between treated banks (those partaking in the blended finance programme) and other (control) banks in terms of the gender composition of their portfolio of small business loans. This is some first descriptive evidence on the bank-level impact of the programme.
Figure 2 Staggered roll-out of the blended finance programme and the share of lending to female entrepreneurs
Notes: This figure shows total outstanding loans to female entrepreneurs as a percentage of the total outstanding stock of loans to all entrepreneurs for treated (WiB) banks in red and non-treated (non-WiB) banks in blue. The vertical dashed lines indicate when each of the five treated banks disbursed their first loan as part of the WiB blended finance program: May 2015, July 2015, February 2016, June 2016, and April 2017.
Data and methodology
The main dataset we use is the Turkish credit registry, which allows us to track firms’ borrowing over time and across lenders, and gauge their risk profile based on credit history and repayment performance. These data are merged with various firm-level administrative records from the Ministry of Treasury and Finance. Using these data, we aim to answer three questions. First, can blended finance durably increase bank lending to female entrepreneurs? Second, which female-owned businesses (if any) gain better access to credit? Third, what are the real-economic impacts (if any) on these firms?
To identify programme effects, a two-way fixed effect model is built around the staggered programme introduction. Because of the by now well-known pitfalls of two-way fixed effects estimators when treatment effects vary across units and time, a ‘stacking’ difference-in differences methodology is used. We also apply a synthetic difference-in-differences estimator, which creates a synthetic control bank for each of the five banks in the programme.
The impact of the blended finance programme on participating banks
Figure 3 shows that before banks entered the blended finance programme, to-be-treated banks (auburn line) and control banks (blue line) were on similar trajectories in terms of the gender composition of their small business loans. Once banks got access to blended finance, at time 0, they started to allocate more credit to female-run firms (auburn line). Nothing changes for control banks (blue line).
Figure 3 Change in the share of lending to female entrepreneurs around WIB entry
Notes: This figure shows the average bank-level change in the share of female entrepreneurs in the stock of outstanding loans to all entrepreneurs before and after banks start participating in the programme. For each of the five treated banks, we normalize the month in which the bank disbursed its first loan as part of the programme to 0. For banks that never participated in the program, we use their monthly observations corresponding to the normalized time scale for each participant bank. We then calculate the average share of lending to female entrepreneurs in each month, relative to the start of the program, for participant banks and for non-participant banks separately.
Further analysis of the micro data confirms that the blended finance programme durably increased lending to female entrepreneurs – both in absolute terms and relative to male-owned firms. Participating banks expand new loan issuance to female entrepreneurs much faster than control banks (Figure 4 shows this for each of the five treated banks). More specifically, treated banks increased the share of all business lending allocated to women by 2 percentage points on average. This is an economically meaningful effect (an increase of 22%), given that treated banks allocated only around 9.0% of their total lending to female entrepreneurs in 2014. Over time, programme impacts do not mean revert but settle at a higher steady state for each of the treated banks, although treatment effects are heterogeneous in terms of size and dynamics (as can again be seen in Figure 4).
Figure 4 Blended finance and lending to female entrepreneurs: Event-study estimates based on synthetic difference-in-differences
Notes: This figure shows estimates for each individual WiB bank in an event-study set-up using the synthetic difference-in-differences methodology of Arkhangelsky et al. (2021). The dependent variable is (log) total loan volume to female entrepreneurs. Error bands show 95% confidence intervals.
Who benefited? The data show that the blended finance programme helped banks to lend more to their existing female clients. This accounts for about 50% of the increase in the share of lending allocated to women. The other half reflects lending to new borrowers: 31% of the increased lending is to female borrowers poached from other lenders and 19% is to firms that had never previously borrowed from any bank. In short, the programme expanded credit to existing borrowers that were still credit-constrained (intensive margin) while also crowding in new female borrowers (extensive margin).
Did loan quality suffer?
A comparison of female first-time borrowers who received their first loan from a treated bank with those borrowing for the first time from a control bank reveals no evidence that the blended finance programme undermined credit quality. First-time female borrowers are equally likely to default – either on bank credit or on debts to suppliers – irrespective of whether they borrow from a treated or control bank. They are also as likely to receive a follow-up loan from their first lender or, in contrast, to leave that bank in the medium-term.
The impact of access to blended finance on female-run businesses
An important question is whether the positive credit supply shocks caused by the blended finance programme helped female-owned firms perform better. This turns out to be the case: a 10% increase in the supply of bank credit to a female entrepreneur due to the WIB programme resulted in an increase in investment of 1.3%. Firms also increase their sales and profits by on average 1.3% and 8.2%, respectively, due to this positive credit shock. Combined, these impacts ensure that beneficiary firms are 2.4 percentage points more likely to remain in business one year after the start of the programme. Importantly, not all firms benefited equally from the programme: those that initially had a higher capital productivity borrow and invest more. This suggests that the programme was effective in helping to improve the allocation of capital across small and medium-sized firms.
Conclusions
Blended finance programmes bundle liquidity support, comprehensive training, and risk sharing. The analysis summarised in this column indicates that this can be an effective approach to motivate and enable banks to lend more to underserved business segments.
A large part of the programme impact occurred on the intensive margin. A higher (temporary) first-loss risk cover might help to entice banks to expand their lending to new female borrowers even more. Another option to strengthen programme impact (other than scaling up) would be to introduce performance-based incentives. Participating banks then receive an interest discount on their credit lines that is conditional on achieving specific goals at the portfolio level, such as a higher share of female borrowers among all clients or among all first-time clients. Such high-powered incentives, applied temporarily and phased out over time, may help to further shift bank lending towards underserved target segments in a profitable and durable way.
References
Alesina, A (2008), “Are Women Discriminated Against in Credit Markets in Italy?”, VoxEU.org, 30 September.
Aydın, H, Ç Bircan, and R De Haas (2024), “Blended Finance and Female Entrepreneurship”, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 18763.
Brock, J M and R De Haas (2023), “Discriminatory Lending: Evidence from Bankers in the Lab”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 15(2): 31-68.
Klapper, L F and S C Parker (2011), “Gender and the Business Environment for New Firm Creation”, World Bank Research Observer 26(2): 237-257.
Nanda, R and S Howell (2020), “Networking Frictions in Venture Capital and the Gender Gap in Entrepreneurship”, VoxEU.org, 29 February.
Finance
Why has the UAE closed its stock exchanges?
The United Arab Emirates has closed its main stock exchanges amid a widening conflict in the region following the United States and Israel’s attacks on Iran.
The UAE’s financial regulator on Sunday announced that its key exchanges in Dubai and Abu Dhabi would not immediately reopen after the weekend break amid the fallout of the US-Israeli attacks that killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
list of 4 itemsend of listRecommended Stories
The announcement that the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange and Dubai Financial Market would remain closed on Monday and Tuesday came after the UAE was hit with hundreds of Iranian missile and drone attacks, including a strike on Abu Dhabi’s main airport that killed one person and wounded seven others.
The UAE’s Capital Markets Authority said in a statement that it would continue to monitor developments in the region and “assess the situation on an ongoing basis, taking any further measures as necessary”.
Here is all you need to know about the move.
Why has the UAE decided to shut its main stock exchanges?
The financial regulator did not elaborate on the rationale for its decision, only saying that it was taken in accordance with its “supervisory and regulatory role” in managing the country’s financial markets.
While closing the stock market outside of scheduled breaks is relatively unusual worldwide, especially in the era of electronic trading, it is not unprecedented.
Typically, when financial authorities halt stock trading during a crisis, it is because they are concerned about panic selling.
During periods of extreme volatility, such as wars and financial crises, investors often rush to sell their holdings to avoid suffering big losses.
As investors sell their stocks, the market value falls further.
This dynamic can spur a vicious cycle that, left unchecked, can lead to a full-blown market crash.
Since the US-Israeli attacks on Iran, stock markets around the world have seen significant – though not catastrophic – losses, while oil prices have risen sharply.
Saudi Arabia’s benchmark Tadawul All Share Index fell more than 4 percent on Sunday, while Egypt’s EGX 30 dropped about 2.5 percent.
In Asia, major stock markets closed lower on Monday, with Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index down about 1.4 percent and 2.2 percent, respectively.
The practice of shutting the market to prevent panic selling is controversial among economists and investors.
Closing the market prevents investors from accessing cash they might need in a hurry.
Critics also argue that such closures only exacerbate the sense of panic they seek to prevent and distort important signals about the market.
“Investors don’t like uncertainty, and at times of market stress, liquidity is most important. It appears the UAE just took that away,” Burdin Hickok, a professor at New York University’s School of Professional Studies, told Al Jazeera.
“This move has the potential of diminishing the status of Dubai as a true major market and weaken investor confidence in the Dubai markets. There has to be some concern about capital flight and negative ripple effects.”
Has this happened before?
The UAE has closed its stock exchanges before, though not due to regional conflict.
In 2022, the UAE halted trading as part of a period of mourning declared to mark the death of President Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan.
The emirate announced a similar pause following the death of Dubai’s ruler, Sheikh Maktoum bin Rashid Al Maktoum, in 2006.
“Historically, to the best of my knowledge, no Middle Eastern state, including Israel, has closed its stock exchange during a time of regional conflict,” Hickok said.
“In prior conflicts, Israel has modified hours of their exchange, but we are talking hours, not days.”
Other countries have shuttered their stock markets during periods of major turmoil in recent years.
After Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, authorities shut the Moscow Exchange for nearly a month.
In 2011, Egypt shut its stock exchange for nearly two months as the country was grappling with the upheaval of the Arab Spring.
After the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq halted trading for six days, the longest suspension since the Great Depression.
How important is the UAE’s stock market?
The UAE is a relatively small player in the world of capital markets, though it has made significant inroads in recent years.
The Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange and Dubai Financial Market have a combined market capitalisation of about $1.1 trillion.
By comparison, the New York Stock Exchange, the world’s biggest bourse, has a market capitalisation of about $44 trillion.
Saudi Arabia’s Saudi Exchange, the biggest exchange in the Middle East, is valued at more than $3 trillion.
Still, the UAE’s stature among financial markets has been on the rise.
Before the latest crisis, UAE-listed stocks had been on a winning streak.
The Dubai Financial Market General Index, which includes companies such as Emirates NBD and Emaar Properties, rose more than 29 percent in the 12 months to February 27.
Haytham Aoun, an assistant professor of finance at the American University in Dubai, said while the UAE could see some outflow of foreign capital, the country’s economy remains on a strong footing.
“A temporary stock market closure will have a limited impact on long-term economic variables, provided the fundamentals remain strong,” Aoun told Al Jazeera.
“In the UAE case, it’s a precautionary intervention, and not a sign of structural weakness.”
Finance
Canton High School students find success in personal finance
CANTON, Miss. (WLBT) – A group of juniors at Canton High School has won back-to-back state championships in Mississippi’s Personal Finance Challenge.
The team’s work can be seen through the school’s reality fair, where students are assigned careers and salaries and must make the same financial decisions adults face each month.
Teena Ruth, a personal finance teacher, said the exercise resonates beyond the classroom.
“It’s an eye-opening experience,” Ruth said. “They kind of see what it’s like for even their parents when they have to make these decisions every day — when they are writing out those checks.”
For student Jalynn Dunigan, the program carries personal significance.
“To be known for something else outside of cheer and not just what I do on a court, on a field. I can do something and put my brains to it and people can know that I’m not just pretty,” Dunigan said. “I’m smart as well.”
Student Henser Vicente said the team’s success sends a broader message.
“We’re making a statement that we’re not what you think we are,” Vicente said. “Like, we’re greater than what you think. We can do better than what you think we can do.”
A proposed financial literacy bill in Mississippi would require students to pass a semester of personal finance as a graduation requirement.
Alexandria Luckett said the team’s national success is already motivating others at the school.
“I’m so happy that people are getting more involved in things like this and stepping out of their comfort zone and just putting themselves out there,” Luckett said. “Because I know there’s a lot of shy students [who] don’t necessarily join clubs or anything. So, when they see a group like this going to nationals two times in a row, I feel like that motivates a lot of students.”
Nelly Rosales said competing at the national level has given the team a platform beyond the competition floor.
“We’ve gone to Cleveland, Ohio, we’ve gone to Atlanta, and then hopefully this year we get to go out of state again,” Rosales said. “Being able to be a role model to a lot of children — like especially Hispanic girls who don’t see a lot of role [models] especially in the community — being able to be a role model is a really big thing.”
The students are currently gearing up for this year’s State Personal Finance Challenge set to take place next month.
Want more WLBT news in your inbox? Click here to subscribe to our newsletter.
See a spelling or grammar error in our story? Please click here to report it and include the headline of the story in your email.
Copyright 2026 WLBT. All rights reserved.
Finance
A 27-year-old drew down half of her stock portfolio to buy real estate. It’s part of her plan to hit financial independence.
A few years into her accounting career, Carolyn Yu began thinking seriously about financial independence.
“I’d feel very stressed and tired,” Yu, who was working at a Big Four firm at the time, told Business Insider. “I thought, maybe someday I could have more freedom and not spend 24/7 working at a very demanding job.”
She picked up “Rich Dad, Poor Dad” and started listening to the popular real estate podcast, BiggerPockets. One takeaway stood out: focus on buying assets that can grow in value.
Yu, who’d been consistently investing in the stock market since college, felt compelled to make a move. In late 2024, she drained about half her stock portfolio in order to pay cash for a two-bedroom, two-bathroom condo in Fort Worth, Texas.
The Bay Area-based Gen Zer had been eyeing Texas in part for its tax advantages, including the absence of state income tax. She considered other Texas markets, but Fort Worth stood out for its affordability and growth potential.
“The population growth, the crime rate, the property value growth — they all looked good to me,” she said.
She flew to Fort Worth, toured the condo, signed a contract the next day, and closed within a month. Yu intentionally kept her first purchase under $100,000, unsure whether she had the capital or experience to take on something larger.
“Pretty much 50% of my stock portfolio was gone,” she said. But the drawdown didn’t faze her. “I knew that $80,000 transitioned into another investment.”
Scaling to 5 properties in 2 years by recycling capital
Yu grew her portfolio by reinvesting equity from one property into the next.
Her strategy centers on buying below market value, improving the property, allowing it to appreciate, and then tapping into the built-up equity to help finance another purchase.
As her portfolio expanded, her financing evolved. She moved from paying all cash for her first condo to using conventional loans and later DSCR (debt service coverage ratio) loans, which are designed for investors and rely heavily on a property’s cash flow.
Her second purchase was a two-bedroom, one-bath single-family home. She bought it in June 2025 for about $105,000, putting down 25%. After investing about $50,000 in renovations, she said the home appraised at $195,000 and rented for $1,500 a month.
“This property allowed me to execute the BRRRR strategy successfully,” she said, referring to buy, rehab, rent, refinance, repeat. She said she was able to pull out about 70% of the appraised value to help fund her next purchases.
Within about two years of buying her first condo, Yu had a five-property portfolio. Her first three are cash-flowing, while her fourth is currently listed for rent, and her fifth is being prepared for tenants. Business Insider reviewed mortgage documents to confirm ownership and lease agreements to verify rental rates.
Courtesy of Carolyn Yu
One of the challenges she’s faced since buying property has been vacancy.
She purchased her first condo in late 2024 — “probably the worst time to rent because of winter vacancy,” she said — and it sat empty for six months. She eventually lowered the asking rent by about $100 a month before securing a tenant.
The vacancy was stressful, but manageable because she had paid cash and didn’t carry a mortgage. Still, she owed about $600 a month in HOA dues.
Her advice to other investors: keep at least six months of reserves, know your numbers inside and out, and expect vacancies and repairs.
Why she prefers real estate to stocks
Yu still invests in stocks, but said she prefers real estate because it feels more controllable and scalable. In addition to generating a few thousand dollars a month in rental income, she’s also building equity in her properties.
“Real estate gave me more control, more tangible assets, more tax efficiency,” she said, pointing to depreciation, mortgage interest deductions, and the ability to refinance without selling. She also enjoys negotiating deals.
She funnels most of her rental income back into her stock portfolio. Her end goal is financial independence and work flexibility.
Yu wants to own at least eight properties by 2027 and have her portfolio appraised at roughly $2 million. By then, she hopes rental income will cover her expenses and provide enough cushion to leave her W-2 job, so she can focus solely on her real estate business.
She’s also changed how she thinks about spending. Early in her career, she said she coped with work stress by traveling frequently. Now, she prioritizes investing over lifestyle upgrades.
“I would rather put my money into investments right now in exchange for vacations in the future,” she said. “I think it’s totally worth it because I think in two years, I could be financially free.”
-
World5 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts5 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO5 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Technology1 week agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Politics1 week agoOpenAI didn’t contact police despite employees flagging mass shooter’s concerning chatbot interactions: REPORT
-
Technology1 week agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making
-
News1 week agoWorld reacts as US top court limits Trump’s tariff powers