Entertainment
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ $100-million sexual assault default judgment, explained
![Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ 0-million sexual assault default judgment, explained Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ 0-million sexual assault default judgment, explained](https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/0ce564e/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3000x1575+0+376/resize/1200x630!/quality/75/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia-times-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fa8%2Fa0%2F6e53b43f4ce084a7fbdb79163d2c%2Fsexual-misconduct-lawsuits-sean-combs-11412.jpg)
Billionaire rap mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs has been mired in numerous accusations of sexual assault and other misconduct in the last year.
On Monday, a Lenawee County circuit court judge in Michigan issued a $100-million default judgment against Combs, who was sued for sexual assault by inmate Derrick Lee Cardello-Smith.
Cardello-Smith, 51, reportedly filed a civil suit in June that alleged Combs, 54, drugged and sexually assaulted him in 1997 at a party in Detroit. During a virtual hearing in August regarding a request for a temporary restraining order, Cardello-Smith indicated he would be requesting a default judgment in the case since Combs had failed to respond to the lawsuit within the mandated timeline. Combs was absent from Monday’s hearing.
Judge Anna Marie Anzalone set Combs’ payment schedule to $10 million a month for 10 months starting Oct. 1.
Attorney Ann Olivarius, the chair and senior partner of law firm McAllister Olivarius, told The Times via email that while “default judgments are common … the stakes involved here are high.”
“Generally false accusations of sexual assault are rare and it is uncommon for a defendant to simply ignore proper service,” said Olivarius. “Combs and his attorney must have known that Judge Anzalone had deemed Derrick Lee Cardello-Smith’s service to be proper. I can only conclude that they took a calculated risk by refusing to respond to that service.”
Combs, through his legal representatives, denied the allegations and accused Cardello-Smith of “committing fraud on the court from prison.”
“Mr. Combs has never heard of him let alone been served with any lawsuit,” Combs’ attorney Marc Agnifilo said in a statement to The Times on Tuesday. “Mr. Combs looks forward to having this judgment swiftly dismissed.”
In addition to being named in numerous civil lawsuits alleging sexual misconduct, Combs has been the subject of a federal inquiry into sex trafficking allegations that led to the March raids of his homes in L.A. and Miami. Combs has denied nearly every sexual misconduct allegation levied against him but publicly apologized for assaulting Cassie Ventura, after video surfaced of him violently attacking his then-girlfriend.
“While raids on Combs’ properties have been conducted as part of a criminal sex trafficking probe, no criminal charges have yet been filed against him,” said Olivarius. “The ongoing scrutiny of Combs’ past is a reminder that the civil justice system can add firepower to a criminal system that is often struggling to cope. Civil courts can help bring serial predators to justice through media attention.”
Here is everything we know about Cardello-Smith’s lawsuit against Combs.
Who is the accuser?
Cardello-Smith was described as an “inmate known for his long history of challenging the judicial system with civil lawsuits” by the Detroit Metro Times. He is currently serving time at the Earnest C. Brooks Correctional Facility on numerous counts of criminal sexual conduct and kidnapping, according to online records. It was previously reported that between 2020 to 2024, Cardello-Smith was a named plaintiff in more than 30 civil lawsuits, some concerning prisoner rights.
“[Cardello-Smith] has filed multiple suits while incarcerated and has represented himself in each case,” said Olivarius. “I have no idea how accurate his testimony is, but I would expect the defense to push hard on this, seeking to undermine the credibility of his allegations.”
What are the allegations?
In his lawsuit, Cardello-Smith claims that he met Combs while working in the restaurant and hospitality industry around Detroit. He alleges he was drugged and sexually assaulted by Combs while he was working at a party in 1997.
What is a default judgment?
A default judgment is generally a ruling found in favor of the plaintiff when the defendant fails to properly respond to a court summons or appear in court. The specific criteria and procedures vary by jurisdiction, but the plaintiff usually requests the judge to decide the case without the defendant’s input since the defendant didn’t respond to the official notice that they are being sued.
Can Combs appeal?
According to Olivarius, “Failing to engage with the courts is not a good defense strategy, but it’s also a relatively easy thing for the defense to put aside.”
“It all comes down to whether Combs has a meritorious defense,” said Olivarius. “The courts are more likely to engage with the argument that the suit was without merit than they are to enforce a $100-million default judgment.”
A defendant subject to a default judgment can file a motion that asks a court to vacate the judgment in some situations. This includes a defendant providing a valid reason for not appearing in court or ignoring the summons, such as not knowing about the lawsuit because they were not properly served.
Adds Olivarius: “Beyond this, Combs and his attorney can appeal the $100-million judgment, even if the verdict holds. The courts have broad discretion here so it’s not a foregone conclusion that the default judgment will hold and it’s far from certain that the award will hold.”
There have been some questions raised about whether Cardello-Smith served Combs properly in connection with this lawsuit. Agnifilo has stated Combs was never served. But during the August virtual hearing, Judge Anzalone noted that the court has proof of proper service. At the same hearing, Cardello-Smith claimed that Combs had visited him in prison to discuss the lawsuit.
![](https://newspub.live/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/np-logo.png)
Movie Reviews
Movie review: ‘Speak No Evil’ remake needs to be talked about
![Movie review: ‘Speak No Evil’ remake needs to be talked about Movie review: ‘Speak No Evil’ remake needs to be talked about](https://www.thelantern.com/files/2024/09/ENTER-MOVIE-FAMREVIEWS-1-MCT.jpeg)
James McAvoy in “Speak No Evil.” Credit: (Jay Maidment/Universal Pictures and Blumhouse/TNS)
Disclaimer: “Speak No Evil” has not yet been released in theaters, with its wide-scale distribution officially set to begin Friday. The Lantern recently participated in an early film screening as well as a virtual roundtable interview with lead actress Mackenzie Davis.
Snakes. Heights. The dark. These common fears are widely acknowledged as daunting.
“Speak No Evil” — director James Watkins’ English-language remake of Danish director Christian Tafdrup’s 2022 film by the same name — draws attention to another primordial fear that may just be more frightening than any other: dinner parties.
Whether it’s dinner with in-laws, drinks with co-workers or high school reunions, everyone has had to begrudgingly put on a good face to maintain the fragile balance of politeness and decorum that keeps an awkward situation from getting ugly.
In “Speak No Evil,” an American family befriends an overly exuberant British couple while on vacation, eventually agreeing to spend a few days at their house so their shy children can bond with one another.
What starts as a seemingly successful playdate quickly turns into a fascinating battle of wills between the two sets of parents, as the British couple’s eccentric personalities begin to make the Americans question if their hosts are hiding a dark secret.
“Speak No Evil” isn’t a horror movie in the traditional sense of the term. It lacks the jumpscares and consistent frights necessary to consistently conform to the genre, but what it does offer is arguably more terrifying.
The film explores how much people will excuse in the name of courtesy, even if it comes at the expense of their own well-being — or their immediate safety.
Though it may not be the most textbook horror flick, “Speak No Evil” is overpoweringly uneasy.
The sometimes-cringe, sometimes-disturbing feeling permeating through the screen isn’t caused by gore or monsters; rather, this discomfort emerges from filmmakers pointing a mirror at viewers, suggesting that if they were in a similar situation, they’d express similar behaviors to avoid an uncomfortable conversation or two.
The main controversy surrounding “Speak No Evil” is its remake status, seeing as the original film was released just two years ago. Some have criticized the apparent need to pander to English-speaking audiences that are too lazy to read subtitles.
It’s true the newest “Speak No Evil” doesn’t do much to justify its existence, apart from featuring a terrifying performance from James McAvoy — arguably his best showing since his role as a young Professor X in the “X-Men” franchise.
The film is essentially a beat-for-beat remake of its Danish predecessor, with the only notable difference being its slightly more comedic tone.
Debates around remakes aside, “Speak No Evil” is here, and it’s undoubtedly an entertaining, well-paced horror-comedy that features great performances from its leads, including McAvoy and Mackenzie Davis (“Black Mirror,” “The Martian”).
Ultimately, “Speak No Evil” is an uncomfortably relatable film that adds to 2024’s growing slate of underappreciated horror flicks.
Rating: 3.5/5
Movie Reviews
‘Saturday Night’ review: A madcap backstage ode to Lorne Michaels’ legendary show
![‘Saturday Night’ review: A madcap backstage ode to Lorne Michaels’ legendary show ‘Saturday Night’ review: A madcap backstage ode to Lorne Michaels’ legendary show](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/09/image-released-sony-pictures-shows-89457325.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=1024)
movie review
SATURDAY NIGHT
Running time: 109 minutes. Rated R (language throughout, sexual references, some drug use and brief graphic nudity). In theaters Sept. 27.
Lorne Michaels should send a check to Sony.
Because the studio’s sent him a love letter. In their new movie “Saturday Night,” a madcap comedy about the 90-minute dash leading up to the 1975 debut episode of “SNL,” the show’s famously enigmatic creator is lionized.
Michaels, the most important behind-the-scenes comedic force of the past 50 years, is placed on an innovator pedestal alongside the likes of Steve Jobs and Mark Zuckerberg, only without their personal downsides.
He’s portrayed as an optimistic young underdog with an improbably bold vision: a completely live, weekly sketch series starring inexperienced, unpolished nobodies in a desert island of time slots.
His “This is Sparta!” speech comes during the climax, when Lorne (Gabriel LaBelle) is grilled by NBC exec David Tebet (Willem Dafoe) about what “Saturday Night Live” exactly is.
Michaels, finding his confidence in real time, tells doubting David it’s discovering a hot new comic at the back of a bar downtown, or being swept up by the music at a tucked-away jazz club.
“It’s everything you think is going to happen when you move to the city,” says a then-30-year-old Michaels. “That’s ‘Saturday Night.’”
And that’s the stuff of goose bumps.
The David-and-Goliath confrontation is the best and most grounded scene in Jason Reitman’s never-less-than-likable film, which had its international premiere Tuesday at the Toronto International Film Festival.
The plot barrels forward like the brakes are broken. And, being a Tour de Frantic, it can be hard to keep up. The gist is that this massive TV hit that spawned countless stars was nearly a disaster that didn’t make it to air. Execs were ready to roll a “Tonight Show” rerun instead.
Knowing this is his only chance, Michaels races around 30 Rock and Studio 8H attempting to get his scrappy creation up and running.
He must control his boisterous young stars, who treat the office as a kegger — or worse. John Belushi (Matt Wood, a find) refuses to sign his contract and heads to a bar. George Carlin (Matthew Rhys), the first host, gets lockjaw from snorting too much cocaine.
The set’s not finished and the dress rehearsal ran three hours. An NBC page (Finn Wolfhard) stands outside on 48th Street begging passersby to be audience members.
On the periphery of the art, there are corporate concerns. The affiliates are in town to decide if they even want to air whatever this is. And whiny network stars Milton Berle (J.K. Simmons) and Johnny Carson are threatened by the annexation of their late-night turf.
For a movie that’s barely longer than an episode of “SNL,” that’s a lot of ground to cover. And those “Noises Off”-style backstage snafus are just a small sampling of all the action. But Reitman ably crams it in, even if the onslaught occasionally gives us whiplash.
Always in motion, “Saturday Night” can be a bit like if Joan Cusack’s sprint at the start of “Broadcast News” lasted for an hour and 45 minutes.
Since the characters barely get a chance to catch their breath, let alone say their piece, we don’t learn much about them beyond familiar traits. However, Reitman’s aim isn’t to seriously illuminate that fateful night so much as to energetically add to showbiz mythology.
The director said onstage at the premiere that, during interviews, the real talents’ accounts of that first show all contradicted each other. We can tell, but the absurdity is part of the fun.
On Oct. 11, 1975, Gilda Radner, Chevy Chase and Dan Aykroyd were not yet household names. They barely mattered in their own studio. But over the course of that year, they’d explode.
So it’s fitting that, in casting actors to play them, Reitman chose some of Hollywood’s most talented rising stars who America will soon know very well.
LaBelle, a revelation as a young Steven Spielberg in “The Fabelmans,” wows once again as Michaels, another dreamer.
I never guessed that Cory Michael Smith, who I’ve watched for years onstage and in Todd Haynes’ films, would make such an uncanny and hilarious Chase with a gift for punch lines.
Cooper Hoffman, whose star-is-born moment came in “Licorice Pizza,” brings that same charming gumption to producer Dick Ebersol. And Ella Hunt exudes Radner’s easy effervescence.
The cast is sadly too gigantic to list off. Some are skilled impressionists, while others manage to get to the meat of their person. Like the aftermath of a sketch being cut from an “SNL” episode, there are times when you wish you could see a lot more of certain performers.
In any case — and who would’ve thought I’d be saying this about a man who barely speaks — the real magic here is LaBelle’s Michaels. Live from New York, it’s Lorne!
Entertainment
Justin Timberlake reportedly reaches plea deal in DWI case ahead of Hamptons hearing
![Justin Timberlake reportedly reaches plea deal in DWI case ahead of Hamptons hearing Justin Timberlake reportedly reaches plea deal in DWI case ahead of Hamptons hearing](https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/6212cbb/2147483647/strip/true/crop/5000x2625+0+0/resize/1200x630!/quality/75/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia-times-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F3c%2Fe2%2F19e1e5134513a610b11846654266%2Fjustin-timberlake-puntos-clave-26019.jpg)
Justin Timberlake is nearing a resolution in his driving while intoxicated case, months after he was arrested in the Hamptons in June.
The “Can’t Stop the Feeling” and “Mirrors” pop star is expected to enter a plea during a Friday hearing where he is set to appear in-person at New York’s Sag Harbour Court, the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office confirmed to The Times. The singer, 43, agreed to plead guilty to a less serious offense than his original driving while intoxicated charge, the Associated Press reported.
Timberlake’s attorney Edward Burke Jr. did not comment to The Times.
The 10-time Grammy Award winner was arraigned June 18 in Sag Harbor Village Justice Court, on the eastern end of Long Island. The musician allegedly failed to stop at a stop sign and struggled to stay in his lane while driving, the Sag Harbor Police Department said. He pleaded not guilty.
Police described Timberlake during the arrest as having “bloodshot and glassy” eyes with a “strong odor of an alcoholic beverage” on his breath, according to court papers obtained by The Times. Police said the singer also had slowed speech and performed poorly on sobriety tests.
Timberlake, amid his Forget Tomorrow World Tour, was released on his own recognizance.
A month after his arrest, lawyer Burke denied his client was intoxicated when he was stopped and alleged there were errors with officials’ arrest documents. In response, a spokesperson for the district attorney told AP, “We stand ready to litigate the underlying facts of this case in court, rather than in the press.”
A police photo of singer Justin Timberlake taken after his June 18, 2024 arrest on suspicion of driving while intoxicated in the Hamptons.
(Sag Harbor Police Department)
Days after his arrest, the former ‘N Sync frontman got candid with fans at a Chicago concert, telling them “it’s been a tough week.”
“Nothing can change this moment right now,” the singer said in June. “I know sometimes I’m hard to love, but you keep on loving me and I love you right back. Thank you so much.”
Timberlake continues his Forget Tomorrow tour later this month with a stop at New Jersey’s Prudential Center. He is slated to play shows in Toronto, Detroit, Orlando and Atlanta, among other cities, before the end of the year.
Times staff writer Nardine Saad contributed to this report.
-
Politics1 week ago
Michigan becomes a top GOP Senate target as Mike Rogers ties with Dem opponent among older voters
-
World7 days ago
Meloni says 'we are making history' as Italy’s FDI reviews progress
-
Business1 week ago
How Self-Driving Cars Get Help From Humans Hundreds of Miles Away
-
World1 week ago
Taiwan court orders release of ex-Taipei mayor arrested in corruption probe
-
Politics1 week ago
Margin of error race between Harris and Trump as 2024 election enters final stretch
-
World1 week ago
Seven EU members hadn’t received any post-Covid funding by end-2023
-
World1 week ago
Israeli forces using ‘war-like’ tactics in occupied West Bank: OCHA
-
World1 week ago
Frontex chief: NGO rescue ships don't embolden Mediterranean migration