Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Movie Review | Tom Blyth, Rachel Zegler shine in latest ‘Hunger Games’ movie

Published

on

Movie Review | Tom Blyth, Rachel Zegler shine in latest ‘Hunger Games’ movie

“The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes” is to its hugely popular universe what “Star Wars: Episode I — The Phantom Menace” is to a galaxy far, far away, but with a couple of key differences.

First, “Ballad” does not appear to be the first in a trilogy of prequels set in the dystopian world created by author Suzanne Collins but instead a stand-alone story.

Also, it’s a better movie.

Instead of the backstory of fallen Jedi Anakin Skywalker, we get the origin of Coriolanus Snow, future tyrannical president of Panem and persistent thorn in the side of “Hunger Games” franchise protagonist Katniss Everdeen. The world may not have been clamoring for a tale built around a pivotal chapter in the life of Coriolanus, but the 2020 novel from which this movie is adapted was well-received.

The screen version illustrates why, as it is a reasonably compelling narrative about a conflicted young man, a man torn between his ambitious nature and his moral compass and feelings for a charming and beautiful young woman.

Advertisement

After a brief prologue featuring Coriolanus as a boy during the Dark Days, precisely three years before the first Hunger Games, we move ahead to catch up with the 18-year-old version (Tom Blyth). His deceased father once a powerful man in Panem’s Capital, Coriolanus now lives with cousin Tigris (Hunter Schafer of “Euphoria”) and their Grandma’am (Fionnula Flanagan, “Waking Ned Devine”) in a meager home. When he’s among his classmates at the Academy, Coriolanus does his best to project that he still comes from wealth, like the rest of them.

Rachel Zegler’s Lucy Gray Baird competes in the 10th Hunger Games in “The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes.” (Courtesy of Lionsgate)

Right before the Reaping ceremony for the upcoming 10th Hunger Games, in which the “tributes” from Panem’s various districts will be chosen for the fight-to-the-death tournament, Coriolanus and other students learn they will be serving as mentors to those future combatants. He becomes the mentor for Lucy Gray Baird (“West Side Story” star Rachel Zegler) of District 12 — which, several decades later, will produce Katniss for the contest.

Coriolanus, as well as everyone else who watches her selection, is taken by Lucy Gray’s impromptu singing, which will become a constant (and welcome) occurrence throughout the movie.

If she wins the Hunger Games, it could be great for the aspiring Coriolanus, who has a nemesis in the Academy’s dean, Casca Highbottom (Peter Dinklage), but a potential champion in Dr. Volumnia Gaul (Viola Davis), an Academy instructor and the head gamesmaker.

However, Coriolanus develops feelings for Lucy Gray, which are heightened after he sneaks aboard a truck carrying her and other tributes to the Capital Zoo, where they are kept behind bars until they are faced with killing one another.

Advertisement

As the story continues, the pair — both orphans, he proudly wears his father’s dress shirt and she finds comfort in being in her mother’s dress — grow closer, and Coriolanus does all he can to help her survive. The Hunger Games are far from the elaborate, high-tech affair they will become in 60-plus years, but they’re just as dangerous given the stakes, and Lucy Gray isn’t exactly the out-for-blood type, so she’ll need some assistance.

Another key player in Coriolanus’ story is classmate and friend Sejanus Plinth (Josh Andrés Rivera, another “West Side Story” alum), who comes from a powerful family but yearns for great change in how the opulent Capital oppresses the poverty-plagued districts. Coriolanus also finds himself protecting Sejanus, but the latter’s actions make that increasingly difficult.

Told in three parts, “Ballad” probably is a little longer than it needs to be at about two and a half hours, and yet it still rushes through its all-important final few minutes.

That aside, it is fairly well told by screenwriters Michael Lesslie (Assassin’s Creed”) and Michael Arndt (“Hunger Games: Catching Fire”), the script holding little nods to the existing saga that fans will appreciate.

That the film is deftly directed by Francis Lawrence is hardly surprising given that he helmed all but the first of the original four “Hunger Games” entries. He understands Collins’ world and always seems confident and comfortable when conducting the goings-on within it.

Advertisement

Franchise producer Nina Jacobson and others responsible also did well with the casting of its leads.

A lot is asked of Blyth (“Billy the Kid”) as Coriolanus: He must make the character likable while infusing him with qualities that allow the viewer to believe he could become the future authoritarian we know and loathe. (It doesn’t hurt that, at least if you squint, you can picture Blyth becoming Donald Sutherland-esque in his later years.)

And Zegler is a no-brainer choice for Lucy Gray, the actress lighting up the screen, just as she does in 2021’s “West Side Story,” and enhancing the proceedings with her lovely singing voice. (Don’t be surprised if, after seeing “Ballad,” you find yourself spending a good bit of time with its soundtrack thanks to the movie’s many enjoyable songs.) Zegler also brings a hint of mystery to the character, as well, which helps make the whole formula of this romance work.

Effective comic relief is provided by Jason Schwartzman’s (“Asteroid City”) Lucretius “Lucky” Flickerman, host of the Games’ TV broadcast — and Panem weatherman — and an ancestor of Stanley Tucci’s Caesar Flickerman.

On the other hand, while they are excellent actors, Davis (“Fences”) and Dinklage (“Game of Thrones”) aren’t all that impactful in portraying their rather uninteresting characters. Gaul calls for the former to go way over the top, wild hair and all, and it’s not where the Academy Award winner excels, while Highbottom is a bit of a bore.

Advertisement

Although Coriolanus’s fall to the dark side is better executed than Anakin’s in the “Star Wars” prequel trilogy, it’s nice to think that his story now has been told.

The guess here is Collins at some point will return to her fertile world for another novel — later resulting in another movie — but that she’ll make a game of another aspect of it.

“The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes” is rated PG-13 for strong violent content and disturbing material. Runtime: 2 hours, 37 minutes.

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

What If Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway Had a Mother-Off, and We All Lost?

Published

on

What If Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway Had a Mother-Off, and We All Lost?

The strange case of Mothers’ Instinct.
Photo: Neon

There’s a new movie starring Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway out this week, which is normally the sort of thing you’d expect to have heard about. But, after its release in the U.K. months ago, Mothers’ Instinct is slipping into U.S. theaters with as little splash as an Olympic diver nailing a triple somersault tuck. The film, a thriller directed by Benoît Delhomme, is getting the treatment typically reserved for a disaster, which is a shame, because I’ve been dying to discuss it with someone, and that’s hard when no one has any idea what you’re on about. Mothers’ Instinct is, indeed, pretty terrible, and not in the so-bad-it’s-good sense, and yet there’s something strangely moving about it. It’s a poignant example of how what looks like rich material to actors can turn out to be lousy material for audiences. Mothers’ Instinct is a remake of a 2018 Belgian film adapted from a novel by Barbara Abel, and watching it, you can appreciate exactly why these two major actors signed on to star in it. Funnily enough, those same qualities go a long way toward explaining why the movie doesn’t work.

Mothers’ Instinct isn’t camp, but it’s close enough that if you squint, you can almost see a version of the film that tips into something broader. Of course, if you squint, you wouldn’t be able to appreciate how immaculately Chastain and Hathaway are costumed. They look incredible — not like two 1960s housewives, which is what they’re playing, so much as two people who keep switching outfits because they can’t decide what to wear to the high-end Mad Men–themed party they’re headed to later. As Alice, Chastain is styled like a Hitchcock blonde in pin-curled ash updos and cardigan sets, while as Alice’s neighbor and friend Céline, Hathaway is given a Jackie O. look that involves a shoulder-length bouffant, pillbox hats, and gloves. They’re cosplayers in a gorgeous, airless setting, adjoining houses on a street that might as well be floating in space, the husbands (played by Anders Danielsen Lie and Josh Charles) vanishing to work for long stretches. The artificiality of this intensely manicured re-creation isn’t to any particular end, which gives the whole movie the air of a Don’t Worry Darling situation in which no one ever wakes up to the twist, instead sleepwalking through a stylized dream of Americana.

Advertisement

In fact, while Alice is restless over having given up her job as a journalist to take care of her son Theo (Eamon O’Connell), and Céline gets ostracized by the community after the death of her son, Max (Baylen D. Bielitz), Mothers’ Instinct isn’t actually all that interested in the pressures of living under a repressive 1960s patriarchy. Instead, it’s about another time-tested theme, one that’s best summed up as: Bitches be crazy. The perfect sheen of its surfaces — Delhomme, who’s making his directorial debut, is a cinematographer who started his career with The Scent of Green Papaya and has since worked with everyone from Tsai Ming-liang to Anton Corbijn — is paired with a score that shrieks unease from the opening scene, in which Céline is thrown a surprise birthday party. The source of this suspense isn’t revealed until later, after Max takes an unintended swan dive off the porch and the women’s friendship is threatened by grief, guilt, and suspicion. Is Céline in mourning, or does she actually irrationally blame Alice for what happened while developing an alarming fixation on Theo? Is Alice right to be suspicious of her bestie, who’s unable to have another baby, or is she being paranoid because the mental illness that previously resulted in her hospitalization has returned? Is it odd that two feminist actors jumped to participate in a film that traffics so freely in unexamined stereotypes about women and hysteria?

Not, it seems, when the opportunities to stare coldly into space or look on in glassy betrayal are this good. I’m not trying to sound snide here — the characters in Mothers’ Instinct have no convincing inner lives at all, but the exterior work of the actors playing them is choice stuff. When Alice and Céline are getting along, Chastain and Hathaway nuzzle together supportively like long-necked swans. When things start to go south, Chastain opts for an aloof distance with stricken eyes, while Hathaway prefers a labored smile that drops as soon as she’s alone. Theirs is a brittle-off no one can win, but both try their hardest anyway. The effort reaches its crescendo at Max’s funeral, where Hathaway’s enormous eyes glimmer through the barrier of a black lace veil and Chastain tilts her face up so that the elegant tracks of past tears can gleam in the light. The scene ends with Céline collapsing in anguish while Alice rushes her tantrumming child out of the church, an explosion of drama that would be so much more effective if the movie had left any room for modulation instead of starting at 10 and staying there. Mothers’ Instinct gets much sillier before it ends, but given how little it establishes as its baseline tone, it doesn’t feel fair to say it goes off the rails. Rather, as Hathaway stares brokenly into the dark and Chastain tears apart her nightstand drawer in panic, what comes to mind is how great a set of GIFs this movie will make someday. That’s not much, but I guess it’s something?

See All

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Twisters – Kenbridge Victoria Dispatch

Published

on

Movie Review: Twisters – Kenbridge Victoria Dispatch

Movie Review: Twisters

Published 11:15 am Friday, July 26, 2024

Let me immediately cut to the chase (pun intended) and answer the question you’re all wondering. TWISTERS is a fun and entertaining summer blockbuster, but it in no way holds a candle to its predecessor TWISTER (1996). Still, the CGI is intense, the sound design is loud and immersive, and the lead performances — especially from Glen Powell — are sure to wow.

Advertisement

Following a horrible tragedy, meteorologist Kate Carter (Daisy Edgar-Jones) has spent years out of the storm chasing business. She now lives in the largely tornado-less New York City, using her innate understanding of storm systems to direct weather alerts. But when her old friend Javi (Anthony Ramos) begs her to join his privately-funded start-up, which is designed to use military-grade radars to learn more about tornadoes and save communities in Oklahoma, she agrees to give him a week of her time. It’s not too long before “tornado wrangler” influencer Tyler Owens (Glen Powell) enters the scene with his ragtag group of weather enthusiasts, creating a competition between scientific research and entertainment. Each group races to be the first on the scene, with Kate and Javi seeking to model the tornado and Tyler trying to get the most likes on social media. But can the two groups find a way to work together or will the competition be more vicious than the tornadoes?

I am admittedly judging myself for caring too much about a summer blockbuster’s plot, because that’s not really what any of us sign up for with these films. But the various encounters with tornadoes begins to feel slightly repetitive and creates pacing issues, making a two-hour film feel like its runtime. And for some reason, it seems like there is something missing when it comes to portraying the sheer terror of experiencing F5 tornadoes, unlike the original film; the main set pieces were not as memorable.

The film does little to make you care about whether the characters live or die, relying on Glen Powell and Daisy Edgar-Jones’s chemistry and natural charisma to do the heavy lifting. The second Powell steps out of his gigantic truck, with his cowboy hat and belt buckle sparkling in the sun… sorry, I just lost my train of thought… and that’s what TWISTERS is hoping. Powell’s magnetism is sure to knock you off your feet and distract you from the film’s middling plot. And while Edgar-Jones’s performance is more muted, due to her character’s battle with PTSD, she brings an important level of humanity to the film and a character to both see yourself in and root for. More than that, her chemistry with Powell is off the charts and will certainly leave you wanting their relationship explored more in a sequel. The supporting characters are not given much to work with and as such, don’t really engender much concern when they are in deadly situations.

One element of TWISTERS I liked more than TWISTER is it showed the emotional and financial toll tornadoes ravage on communities. Of course, that is an element of the first film, but TWISTERS does a great job showcasing the speed in which tornadoes can overtake and devastate a community, both in loss of life and loss of property. This, juxtaposed with the “fun” in chasing storms brings a real human element to the film. I also want to give a shoutout to the movie not having any sad animal scenes (apart from a possible run-in with a chicken). So for all of you sickos excited to see another flying cow, this isn’t for you.

TWISTERS is the exact kind of movie you need to see in a theater so you can get the full experience. Where else can you admire the cinematography, get immersed in the sound design, and lose yourself in Glen Powell’s cowboy hat and million dollar smile? I saw it in a Dolby theater and was blown away.

Advertisement

There is no end credit scene.

My Review: B

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Raayan Telugu Movie Review, Dhanush, Sundeep Kishan

Published

on

Raayan Telugu Movie Review, Dhanush, Sundeep Kishan

Movie Name : Raayan

Release Date : July 26, 2024

123telugu.com Rating : 2.75/5

Starring : Dhanush, Sandeep Kishan, Kalidasu Jairam, Aparna Balamurali, SJ Surya, Saravanan

Director : Dhanush

Producers : Kalanithi Maran

Advertisement

Music Director: A. R. Rahman

Cinematographer: Om Prakash

Editor: Prasanna GK

Related Links : Trailer

Raayan is Dhanush’s 50th film as an actor and his second as a director. The film released in cinemas worldwide today amid moderate expectations. This review explores how the film performed. Read on.

Advertisement

 

Story:

Kaartavaraayan aka Raayan (Dhanush), enjoys a quiet life in Anjanaouram with his brothers Muthuvelaraayan (Sundeep Kishan), Maanikyaraayan (Kalidas Jayaram), and sister Durga (Dushara Vijayan). Their tranquility is shattered when Muthu gets into a fight with the local don Dorai’s (Saravanan) men, setting off a dangerous rivalry. Sethuram (SJ Suryah), another gangster, steps into the fray with a deadly plan to eliminate Raayan. What drives Sethuram’s desire to kill Raayan? Who is Raayan beneath the surface? What is his true purpose? The film unveils all these secrets.

 

Plus Points:

Advertisement

Expectations were high when the film was announced, as it is directed by Dhanush. Besides his intense acting, Dhanush demonstrates his directing skills neatly.

Sundeep Kishan takes on a significant role and delivers an exceptional performance with his portrayal of a character with grey shades. His scenes with Dhanush and Aparna Balamurali are enjoyable.

Dushara Vijayan is unexpectedly strong in her role, which becomes more intense in the second half. SJ Suryah, as usual, gives an exemplary performance. Aparna Balamurali, Selvaraghavan, and others perform decently in their respective roles.

 

Minus Points:

Advertisement

The movie doesn’t offer much that’s new for viewers. Dhanush presents a routine story with very few twists, but the slow-paced screenplay diminishes the story’s impact.

There is no strong hook to illustrate the conflict between SJ Suryah and Dhanush. The reasons provided are unconvincing, and SJ Suryah’s potential is not fully utilised.

Advertisement

The film caters mainly to action movie enthusiasts and may not be suitable for family audiences due to its violent content.

Prakash Raj’s character lacks originality, and Varalaxmi Sarathkumar has minimal relevance to the plot. Additionally, including more emotional depth might have improved the film. The second half feels dragged out, with unnecessary scenes added to extend the film.

 

Technical Aspects:

As a director, writer, and actor, Dhanush displays his skills, but as a writer and director, he could have crafted a more engaging story. The sluggish second half could have been tightened.

Advertisement

Given the high expectations, AR Rahman’s work is noticeable but slightly disappointing. The cinematography by Om Prakash is decent, while editing by Prasanna GK could have been better. Production values are satisfactory.

 

Verdict:

On the whole, Raayan offers nothing new but remains passable due to the strong performances by Dhanush, Sundeep Kishan, Dushara Vijayan, and SJ Suryah. The action scenes are adequate but not suitable for family audiences. The lack of a strong hook point and a dragging second half are notable drawbacks. If you still decide to watch it, manage your expectations accordingly.

123telugu.com Rating: 2.75/5

Advertisement

Reviewed by 123telugu Team

Click Here For Telugu Review

Articles that might interest you:

Advertisement


Advertisement



Continue Reading

Trending