Movie Reviews
Kensuke's Kingdom Review: Simple & Heartfelt Animation
Kensuke’s Kingdom takes full advantage of its simple story with vivid animation and detail that evoke heartfelt childlike wonder.
Directors: Neil Boyle & Kirk Hendry
Genre: Animated, Adventure
Run Time: 84′
UK & Irish Release: August 2, 2024
US Release: TBA
Where to watch: in cinemas
Kensuke’s Kingdom is a British 2-D animated film … which, the more I think about it, I can’t remember the last time I ever saw one of those. This work of animation is based on Michael Morpurgo’s 1999 novel that I had never even heard of, but having seen the film and then read the summary of the book’s plot, I can almost guarantee it would have moved me had I read it as a kid.
Thankfully, this film adaptation brought out that reaction of childlike wonder in a distinctly simple, heartfelt way that very few animated films – hell, very few films, period – manage to do.
In Kensuke’s Kingdom, Michael (Aaron MacGregor) is a boy who’s traveling at sea with his family. But when a storm throws him and his dog overboard, they’re washed up on a remote island. They eventually come across a former Japanese World War II soldier named Kensuke (Ken Watanabe, of Godzilla), who’s turned the island into his own haven. Michael soon assimilates into his … well, kingdom, and the two of them fill in missing pieces of each other as they survive together … along with Stella the dog. Stella the dog is very important.
I know this premise may not sound too extraordinary, and at its core, it’s really not. You’ve seen some variation of this type of story before. But in the case of Kensuke’s Kingdom, it’s all about the execution that takes full advantage of its simplicity. The film doesn’t try to throw a bunch of zany jokes at you, it doesn’t fall back on hand-holding or excessive verbal exposition for the kids, and it absolutely doesn’t suffer from the rushed pacing that I’ve criticized other family-oriented animated films ad nauseum for doing (which is shocking, considering the movie’s length of just 84 minutes).
I really need to stick to that last point, because it contributes to what a graceful film Kensuke’s Kingdom is. It wants you to relish in the beauty of its landscapes, sharply naturalistic sound work, and smaller details that a lot of animated films wouldn’t necessarily think to include, like the unspoken hesitation of a character to go somewhere while another moves unwaveringly, or the proper seconds needed for a delayed reaction to a certain revelation, or every lifelike movement of Stella. Much more time than I was expecting is spent on Michael stranded on the island before he meets Kensuke, making you feel not just every sight, sound, and touch of such a remote environment, but the passage of days he spends stuck there all alone and the almost jarring contrast when he finds another person to talk with and receive help from.
The animation has an almost sketchy quality to it that, for the most part, really complements that rugged, simple story. That doesn’t even include the couple of scenes where the form is switched up. The first instance is cute and fitting of a good old family bonding scene, but the second one is downright chilling as it delivers backstory in a remarkable paint-like style that’s married to brilliant, multilayered visuals. I just don’t like the facial animations on Michael and his family. They’re a little stiff and occasionally lifeless, especially when compared to Kensuke’s expressions that I get a lot more emotion out of (despite him being the most reserved character of the film).
At the core of Kensuke’s Kingdom is the relationship between Michael, Kensuke, and Stella. Yes, I’m including her because dogs are better than people and deserve equal billing. Especially this one. Both human characters are missing something crucial, with Michael’s being obvious – a sense of responsibility and maturity – and Kensuke’s being revealed later. On the surface, this is your typical young-boy-befriends-old-wise-man storyline, but the pacing and visual storytelling are so good and bolstered by the fact that Kensuke himself speaks no English. This was apparently changed from the book, and it’s a really smart decision that makes their bond stick out in a unique way and feel all the more impactful that it happens at all. It even adds a cultural undercurrent to their connection that a lot of kids – and let’s be honest, many adults – could really learn from.
I was even starting to dread the possibility of Michael reuniting with his family because he’d grown so close to Kensuke and his home, and Kensuke clearly came to see him as a son. But obviously, Michael could never forget about the loved ones he would leave behind forever by staying. The more I thought about it – and the film quietly lets you think about it a lot – the more my heart broke at the thought of either scenario. Without revealing the outcome, the ending genuinely got me emotional for all of these reasons.
Going into Kensuke’s Kingdom, however, I had one major fear, because I saw one of the major developments of the film in its trailer: a group of poachers arrives to terrorize the island and the main cast’s animal friends. I was dreading this as potential film-ruining because it would turn this warm, minimalist story of friendship with no forced conflict into another evil-white-man-versus-nature story that we’ve seen a billion times. The Wild Robot’s already gonna make that mistake later this year, so I was ready to have this film tainted as a whole for the same reason.
But despite what the marketing may tell you, this is not the film’s focus or even one of the main driving forces of the plot. It happens for around ten minutes, the characters reel in response and grow closer … and then the story moves on. There’s no big climax where our heroes join forces to save their home or anything like that. We just get to see more of the proper progression and endgame of their journey together. Words can’t describe how relieved I am to say that. Sure, the character growth yielded from this could have been done more organically, but screw it. I’ll take it.
As a story, Kensuke’s Kingdom isn’t spectacular, but it’s told in such an engaging way that puts razor-sharp focus on all of its strengths. I can see a lot of people coming out of it thinking it was simply “cute” and not much more, and I would understand that. But as someone who’s had an admittedly complicated relationship with more eccentric animated films and shows, I think I just appreciate this one for not falling into most of tropes and stylistic choices that others do. That, and Kensuke’s Kingdom brought me back to childhood memories of reading similar survival tales like The Hatchet or The Cay, so that chord was struck with enough intensity to penetrate my rusty, cynical heart. There was clearly a lot of love put into this film, and I’m happy to give my own love back to it.
Kensuke’s Kingdom will be released in UK and Irish cinemas on August 2, 2024.
Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind Film Review – Loud And Clear Reviews
Miyazaki’s Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind has an engaging narrative, strong leads, spectacular visuals, and an environmental theme.
Movie Reviews
‘Hoppers’ review: Pixar’s best original movie in years
“So it’s like Avatar?” one character quips in Disney and Pixar’s “Hoppers,” bluntly translating the film’s high-concept premise for the sugar-fueled kids in the audience. And yes, the comparison is apt. The story follows a nature-obsessed teenage girl who manages to quite literally “hop” her consciousness into the body of a robotic beaver in order to spark an animal rebellion against a greedy mayor determined to bulldoze their forest for a freeway.
It’s a clever hook. The kind of big, elastic idea Pixar used to make look effortless. “Hoppers” does not reach the rarified air of “Up,” “Wall-E,” or “Inside Out,” but after a stretch of uneven originals like “Turning Red” and “Luca,” and outright misfires such as “Elemental” and “Elio,” this feels like a genuine course correction. The environmental messaging is clear without being preachy, the animals are irresistibly anthropomorphized, and the studio’s once-signature emotional sincerity is back in sturdy form.
Pixar can afford to gamble on originals when it has a guaranteed cash cow like this summer’s “Toy Story 5” waiting in the wings, but “Hoppers” earns its place in the catalogue. Director Daniel Chong crafts a warm, heartfelt film that occasionally strains under the weight of its own ambition, yet remains grounded by character and theme. Its meditation on conservation and animal displacement feels timely in a way that never tips into after-school-special territory.
We meet Mabel, voiced with bright conviction by Piper Curda, as a child liberating her classroom pets and returning them to the wild. Her moral compass is shaped by her grandmother, voiced by Karen Huie, who imparts wisdom about nature’s sanctity. True to both Pixar tradition and the broader Disney playbook, this beacon of guidance does not survive past the opening act. Loss, after all, is Pixar’s favorite inciting incident.
Years later, Mabel is still fighting the good fight, squaring off against the smarmy Mayor Jerry, voiced with slick menace by Jon Hamm. He plans to flatten the glade where Mabel and her grandmother once found solace. Mabel’s resistance feels noble but futile. The animals have already mysteriously vanished, the machinery is coming, and her last-ditch plan involves luring a beaver back to the abandoned forest in hopes of jumpstarting the ecosystem.
That’s when the film gleefully pivots into mad-scientist territory. At Beaverton University, Mabel discovers her professor, voiced by Kathy Najimy, has developed a device that can project human consciousness into synthetic animals. The process, dubbed “hopping,” allows Mabel to inhabit a robotic beaver and infiltrate the forest from within. It’s an inspired escalation that keeps the film buoyant even when the plotting grows predictable.
Her new posse includes King George, a lovably beaver voiced by Bobby Moynihan with distinct Bing Bong energy; a sharp-tongued bear voiced by Melissa Villaseñor; a regal bird king voiced by the late Isiah Whitlock Jr.; and a fish queen voiced by Ego Nwodim. As is often the case with Pixar, even in its lesser efforts, the world-building is meticulous. The animal hierarchy, complete with titles like “paw of the king,” is layered with jokes that play for kids while slyly winking at adults.
The plot ultimately follows a familiar template. Scrappy underdog rallies community. Corporate villain twirls metaphorical mustache. Emotional third-act sacrifice looms. At times, you can feel the machinery working a little too cleanly. Pixar, and Disney at large, has grown increasingly reliant on sequels and established IP, and “Hoppers” does not radically reinvent the wheel. In an animated landscape where films like “K-Pop: Demon Hunters,” “Across the Spider-Verse,” and “Goat” are pushing stylistic and narrative boundaries, being safe and sturdy may not always be enough.
And yet, there is something refreshing about a Pixar original that remembers how to tug at the heart without squeezing it dry. “Hoppers” is playful, peppered with cheeky needle drops, and builds to a sweet emotional catharsis that may or may not have left this critic a little misty-eyed. It feels earnest and engaged.
“Hoppers” may not be top-tier Pixar. But it is a welcome return to form, a reminder that the studio still knows how to marry big ideas with a bigger heart.
HOPPERS opens in theaters Friday, March 6th.
Movie Reviews
‘Hoppers’ review: Who can argue with hilarious talking animals?
Just when you think Pixar’s petting-zoo cute new movie “Hoppers” is flagrantly ripping off James Cameron, the characters come clean.
movie review
HOPPERS
Running time: 105 minutes. Rated PG (action/peril, some scary images and mild language). In theaters March 6.
“You guys, this is like ‘Avatar’!,” squeals 19-year-old Mabel (Piper Curda), the studio’s rare college-age heroine.
Shoots back her nutty professor, Dr. Fairfax (Kathy Kajimy): “This is nothing like ‘Avatar!’”
Sorry, Doc, it definitely is. And that’s fine. Placing the smart sci-fi story atop an animated family film feels right for Pixar, which has long fused the technological, the fantastical and the natural into a warm signature blend. Also, come on, “Avatar” is “Dances With Wolves” via “E.T.”
What separates “Hoppers” from the pack of recent Pix flix, which have been wholesome as a church bake sale, is its comic irreverence.
Director Daniel Chong’s original movie is terribly funny, and often in an unfamiliar, warped way for the cerebral and mushy studio. For example, I’ve never witnessed so many speaking characters be killed off in a Pixar movie — and laughed heartily at their offings to boot.
What’s the parallel to Pandora? Mabel, a budding environmental activist, has stumbled on a secret laboratory where her kooky teachers can beam their minds into realistic robot animals in order to study them. They call the devices “hoppers.”
Bold and fiery Mabel — PETA, but palatable — sees an opportunity.
The mayor of Beaverton, Jerry (Jon Hamm), plans to destroy her beloved local pond that’s teeming with wildlife to build an expressway. And the only thing stopping the egomaniacal pol — a more upbeat version of President Business from “The Lego Movie” — is the water’s critters, who have all mysteriously disappeared.
So, Mabel avatars into beaver-bot, and sets off in search of the lost creatures to discover why they’ve left.
From there, the movie written by Jesse Andrews (“Luca”) toys with “Toy Story.” Here’s what mischief fuzzy mammals, birds, reptiles and insects get up to when humans aren’t snooping around. Dance aerobics, it turns out.
Per the usual, “Hoppers” goes deep inside their intricate society. The beasts have a formal political system of antagonistic “Game of Thrones”-like royal houses. The most menacing are the Insect Queen (Meryl Streep — I’d call her a chameleon, but she’s playing a bug), a staunch monarch butterfly and her conniving caterpillar kid (Dave Franco). They’re scheming for power.
Perfectly content with his station is Mabel’s new best furry friend King George (Bobby Moynihan), a gullible beaver who ascended to the throne unexpectedly. He happily enforces “pond rules,” such as, “When you gotta eat, eat.”
That means predators have free rein to nosh on prey, and everybody’s cool with it. Because of bone-dry deliveries, like exhausted office drones, the four-legged cast members are hilarious as they go about their Animal Planet activities.
No surprise — talking lizards, sharks, bears, geese and frogs are the real stars here. They far outshine Mabel, even when she dons beaver attire. Much like a 19-year-old in a job interview, she doesn’t leave much of an impression.
Yes, the teen has a heartfelt motivation: The embattled pond was her late grandma’s favorite place. Mabel promised her that she’d protect it.
But in personality she doesn’t rank as one of Pixar’s most engaging leads, perhaps because she’s past voting age. Mabel is nestled in a nebulous phase between teenage rebellion and adulthood that’s pretty blasé, even if a touch of tension comes from her hiding her Homo sapien identity from her new diminutive pals. When animated, kids make better adventurers, plain and simple.
“Hoppers” continues Pixar’s run of humble, charming originals (“Luca,” “Elio”) in between billion-dollar-grossing, idea-starved sequels (“Inside Out 2,” probably “Toy Story 5”). The Disney-owned studio’s days of irrepressible innovation and unmatched imagination are well behind it. No one’s awed by anything anymore. “Coco,” almost 10 years ago, was their last new property to wow on the scale of peak Pixar.
Look, the new movie is likable and has a brain, heart and ample laughs. That’s more than I can say for most family fare. “A Minecraft Movie” made me wanna hop right out of the theater.
Movie Reviews
Review | Hoppers: Pixar’s new animation is a hilarious, heartfelt animal Avatar
4/5 stars
Bounding into cinemas just in time for spring, the latest Pixar animation is a pleasingly charming tale of man vs nature, with a bit of crazy robot tech thrown in.
The star of Hoppers is Mabel Tanaka (voiced by Piper Curda), a young animal-lover leading a one-girl protest over a freeway being built through the tranquil countryside near her hometown of Beaverton.
Because the freeway is the pet project of the town’s popular mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who is vying for re-election, Mabel’s protests fall on deaf ears.
Everything changes when she stumbles upon top-secret research by her biology professor, Dr Sam Fairfax (Kathy Najimy), that allows for the human consciousness to be linked to robotic animals. This lets users get up close and personal with other species.
-
World6 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts6 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO6 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Oregon4 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Florida3 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Maryland3 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Culture1 week agoTry This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies
