Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Film Review: Record of A Tenement Gentleman (1947) by Yasujiro Ozu

Published

on

Film Review: Record of A Tenement Gentleman (1947) by Yasujiro Ozu

The stark reality of what Ozu saw around him: the fragmentation of both self and society, a theme that would haunt him throughout his cinematic life

“Record of A Tenement Gentleman” is one of Ozu’s great early films, and one which was also screened last year at Cannes as part of their Classics section.  

The plot outline of “Record”, like most of Ozu’s works, is deceptively simple (and also full of comic touches). In post-war Japan, a man living in an impoverished Tokyo tenement brings home an abandoned child (Kohei). O-Tane, a hard-hearted widow living in the same tenement, is forced to take care of Kohei. In what follows, we gradually see O-Tane’s change of heart, from her initial anger at Kohei’s bedwetting, her endless tricks to get rid of the boy, to finally growing fond of him.

What is most remarkable is how each scene, character, and setting is ingrained with the disastrous after-effects of WW2. Tashiro, Tamekichi, and O-Tane, the three residents of the tenement we are introduced to, each suffer from the economic consequences of the war: Tashiro is a street fortune teller, Tamekichi mends pots and pans, while O-Tane does odd jobs to make ends meet. Indeed, most conversations in “Record” centre around deprivation and hardship. When Tamekichi’s Americanised daughter suddenly turns up for lunch, Tamekichi reprimands her for not bringing anything and then wanting to eat his lunch. Moreover, the implications of societal turmoil here are not just economic but also moral: when the Kawayashis throw a dinner party for everyone with the money their son has won in the lottery, everyone unanimously agrees on how luck only falls on pure-minded and innocent children, unlike their adult counterparts. This thematic layer – the breakdown of traditional structures and the corresponding advent of modernity – is integral to Ozu’s cinema. These were for him events which had an irreversible impact on both Japanese society and individual morality.

Subscribe to AMP by clicking on the image below

Though “Record” features a wider variety of shots that one is used to in an Ozu film – more medium shots and long shots, an oftentimes panning camera – it also provides some nascent glimpses of what would go on to characterise his signature style of filmmaking. There is for instance the distinctive Tatami-mat shot, directly frontal, stationary, and filmed from a low height, as if from the eye level of a person kneeling on a tatami mat. “Record” is also replete with ‘pillow’ shots, those seemingly random cutaways of everyday life that provide a break from the narrative: clothes swaying in the breeze, smoke rising out of chimneys…

Equally intriguing to behold are the conscious experiments with pacing, with scenes ending always a beat or two later than they ought to. Early in the film, O-Tane warns Kohei not to wet the bed again, and ruminates on what kind of a cold-hearted father the kid must have. Throughout, the scene goes from mid shot coverage to individual close ups. And yet, it doesn’t end when the monologue ends. Instead, we goes back again to Kohei sleeping on a large bed, now accompanied by silence, and then see a deliberately stretched out shot of O-Tane staring at her nails and looking straight ahead. Here, we see an instance of plot points taking a backseat for what has been called ‘dead time’, something which will go on to form an integral part of Ozu’s famous Noriko Trilogy.

Advertisement

In similar fashion, there is very little sentimentality on display. There is for instance no major build up to the boy being found (or even when he runs away). It simply happens, and what we are studiously shown is the before-and-after of events. This lack of sentimentality also seeps into the acting.  Thus, Choko Iida plays O-Tane with a restrained expressivity, always keeping herself in check despite being prone to heightened emotions. There is a sense in which the action is directly acted out rather than being interpreted. When O-Tane scolds Kohei (Hohi Aoki) after another bedwetting session, he scrunches up his face and raises his hands to his eyes as if to wipe tears, even though there is no actual crying involved. It is the action rather than the interpretation that is important, something that might have more to do with traditional Japanese theatre performance than than what we today understand as realist acting.

Towards the end, just when O-Tane gets extremely attached to Kohei, and is almost beginning to treat him like her own son, the little kid’s father suddenly turns up to take him back. Kohei, it turns out, was merely lost and not abandoned. Later, Tashiro and Tamekichi visit O-tane and congratulate her for finally being free. Without no much as a warning, O-Tane, who for so long has kept up a restrained facade, suddenly breaks down. It is a singularly touching moment, in a film that has so far kept all things sentimental at bay (one is immediately reminded of other crying scenes in Ozu’s films, be it Noriko in “Late Spring” or Ayako in “Late Autumn”). O-tane remarks that she is crying not because she is sad, but because of how happy Kohei and his father were. The emotional outburst then leads to a realisation; being selfish won’t do, and one has to stop worrying only about oneself.

Yet again, we encounter a tendency strewn across Ozu’s works, of seemingly inconsequential everyday acts and events that acquire the magnitude of a soul-shattering revelation. Here, as in other places, it is the ephemerality of everything, and ultimately of life itself.

“Record” ends with a sobering image, a montage of boys orphaned and made homeless by the war, aimlessly wandering around the influential samurai Saigo Takamori’s statue. There is hope in O-Tane’s changed personality, but also the stark reality of what Ozu saw around him: the fragmentation of both self and society, a theme that would haunt him throughout his cinematic life.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

What If Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway Had a Mother-Off, and We All Lost?

Published

on

What If Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway Had a Mother-Off, and We All Lost?

The strange case of Mothers’ Instinct.
Photo: Neon

There’s a new movie starring Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway out this week, which is normally the sort of thing you’d expect to have heard about. But, after its release in the U.K. months ago, Mothers’ Instinct is slipping into U.S. theaters with as little splash as an Olympic diver nailing a triple somersault tuck. The film, a thriller directed by Benoît Delhomme, is getting the treatment typically reserved for a disaster, which is a shame, because I’ve been dying to discuss it with someone, and that’s hard when no one has any idea what you’re on about. Mothers’ Instinct is, indeed, pretty terrible, and not in the so-bad-it’s-good sense, and yet there’s something strangely moving about it. It’s a poignant example of how what looks like rich material to actors can turn out to be lousy material for audiences. Mothers’ Instinct is a remake of a 2018 Belgian film adapted from a novel by Barbara Abel, and watching it, you can appreciate exactly why these two major actors signed on to star in it. Funnily enough, those same qualities go a long way toward explaining why the movie doesn’t work.

Mothers’ Instinct isn’t camp, but it’s close enough that if you squint, you can almost see a version of the film that tips into something broader. Of course, if you squint, you wouldn’t be able to appreciate how immaculately Chastain and Hathaway are costumed. They look incredible — not like two 1960s housewives, which is what they’re playing, so much as two people who keep switching outfits because they can’t decide what to wear to the high-end Mad Men–themed party they’re headed to later. As Alice, Chastain is styled like a Hitchcock blonde in pin-curled ash updos and cardigan sets, while as Alice’s neighbor and friend Céline, Hathaway is given a Jackie O. look that involves a shoulder-length bouffant, pillbox hats, and gloves. They’re cosplayers in a gorgeous, airless setting, adjoining houses on a street that might as well be floating in space, the husbands (played by Anders Danielsen Lie and Josh Charles) vanishing to work for long stretches. The artificiality of this intensely manicured re-creation isn’t to any particular end, which gives the whole movie the air of a Don’t Worry Darling situation in which no one ever wakes up to the twist, instead sleepwalking through a stylized dream of Americana.

Advertisement

In fact, while Alice is restless over having given up her job as a journalist to take care of her son Theo (Eamon O’Connell), and Céline gets ostracized by the community after the death of her son, Max (Baylen D. Bielitz), Mothers’ Instinct isn’t actually all that interested in the pressures of living under a repressive 1960s patriarchy. Instead, it’s about another time-tested theme, one that’s best summed up as: Bitches be crazy. The perfect sheen of its surfaces — Delhomme, who’s making his directorial debut, is a cinematographer who started his career with The Scent of Green Papaya and has since worked with everyone from Tsai Ming-liang to Anton Corbijn — is paired with a score that shrieks unease from the opening scene, in which Céline is thrown a surprise birthday party. The source of this suspense isn’t revealed until later, after Max takes an unintended swan dive off the porch and the women’s friendship is threatened by grief, guilt, and suspicion. Is Céline in mourning, or does she actually irrationally blame Alice for what happened while developing an alarming fixation on Theo? Is Alice right to be suspicious of her bestie, who’s unable to have another baby, or is she being paranoid because the mental illness that previously resulted in her hospitalization has returned? Is it odd that two feminist actors jumped to participate in a film that traffics so freely in unexamined stereotypes about women and hysteria?

Not, it seems, when the opportunities to stare coldly into space or look on in glassy betrayal are this good. I’m not trying to sound snide here — the characters in Mothers’ Instinct have no convincing inner lives at all, but the exterior work of the actors playing them is choice stuff. When Alice and Céline are getting along, Chastain and Hathaway nuzzle together supportively like long-necked swans. When things start to go south, Chastain opts for an aloof distance with stricken eyes, while Hathaway prefers a labored smile that drops as soon as she’s alone. Theirs is a brittle-off no one can win, but both try their hardest anyway. The effort reaches its crescendo at Max’s funeral, where Hathaway’s enormous eyes glimmer through the barrier of a black lace veil and Chastain tilts her face up so that the elegant tracks of past tears can gleam in the light. The scene ends with Céline collapsing in anguish while Alice rushes her tantrumming child out of the church, an explosion of drama that would be so much more effective if the movie had left any room for modulation instead of starting at 10 and staying there. Mothers’ Instinct gets much sillier before it ends, but given how little it establishes as its baseline tone, it doesn’t feel fair to say it goes off the rails. Rather, as Hathaway stares brokenly into the dark and Chastain tears apart her nightstand drawer in panic, what comes to mind is how great a set of GIFs this movie will make someday. That’s not much, but I guess it’s something?

See All

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Twisters – Kenbridge Victoria Dispatch

Published

on

Movie Review: Twisters – Kenbridge Victoria Dispatch

Movie Review: Twisters

Published 11:15 am Friday, July 26, 2024

Let me immediately cut to the chase (pun intended) and answer the question you’re all wondering. TWISTERS is a fun and entertaining summer blockbuster, but it in no way holds a candle to its predecessor TWISTER (1996). Still, the CGI is intense, the sound design is loud and immersive, and the lead performances — especially from Glen Powell — are sure to wow.

Advertisement

Following a horrible tragedy, meteorologist Kate Carter (Daisy Edgar-Jones) has spent years out of the storm chasing business. She now lives in the largely tornado-less New York City, using her innate understanding of storm systems to direct weather alerts. But when her old friend Javi (Anthony Ramos) begs her to join his privately-funded start-up, which is designed to use military-grade radars to learn more about tornadoes and save communities in Oklahoma, she agrees to give him a week of her time. It’s not too long before “tornado wrangler” influencer Tyler Owens (Glen Powell) enters the scene with his ragtag group of weather enthusiasts, creating a competition between scientific research and entertainment. Each group races to be the first on the scene, with Kate and Javi seeking to model the tornado and Tyler trying to get the most likes on social media. But can the two groups find a way to work together or will the competition be more vicious than the tornadoes?

I am admittedly judging myself for caring too much about a summer blockbuster’s plot, because that’s not really what any of us sign up for with these films. But the various encounters with tornadoes begins to feel slightly repetitive and creates pacing issues, making a two-hour film feel like its runtime. And for some reason, it seems like there is something missing when it comes to portraying the sheer terror of experiencing F5 tornadoes, unlike the original film; the main set pieces were not as memorable.

The film does little to make you care about whether the characters live or die, relying on Glen Powell and Daisy Edgar-Jones’s chemistry and natural charisma to do the heavy lifting. The second Powell steps out of his gigantic truck, with his cowboy hat and belt buckle sparkling in the sun… sorry, I just lost my train of thought… and that’s what TWISTERS is hoping. Powell’s magnetism is sure to knock you off your feet and distract you from the film’s middling plot. And while Edgar-Jones’s performance is more muted, due to her character’s battle with PTSD, she brings an important level of humanity to the film and a character to both see yourself in and root for. More than that, her chemistry with Powell is off the charts and will certainly leave you wanting their relationship explored more in a sequel. The supporting characters are not given much to work with and as such, don’t really engender much concern when they are in deadly situations.

One element of TWISTERS I liked more than TWISTER is it showed the emotional and financial toll tornadoes ravage on communities. Of course, that is an element of the first film, but TWISTERS does a great job showcasing the speed in which tornadoes can overtake and devastate a community, both in loss of life and loss of property. This, juxtaposed with the “fun” in chasing storms brings a real human element to the film. I also want to give a shoutout to the movie not having any sad animal scenes (apart from a possible run-in with a chicken). So for all of you sickos excited to see another flying cow, this isn’t for you.

TWISTERS is the exact kind of movie you need to see in a theater so you can get the full experience. Where else can you admire the cinematography, get immersed in the sound design, and lose yourself in Glen Powell’s cowboy hat and million dollar smile? I saw it in a Dolby theater and was blown away.

Advertisement

There is no end credit scene.

My Review: B

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Raayan Telugu Movie Review, Dhanush, Sundeep Kishan

Published

on

Raayan Telugu Movie Review, Dhanush, Sundeep Kishan

Movie Name : Raayan

Release Date : July 26, 2024

123telugu.com Rating : 2.75/5

Starring : Dhanush, Sandeep Kishan, Kalidasu Jairam, Aparna Balamurali, SJ Surya, Saravanan

Director : Dhanush

Producers : Kalanithi Maran

Advertisement

Music Director: A. R. Rahman

Cinematographer: Om Prakash

Editor: Prasanna GK

Related Links : Trailer

Raayan is Dhanush’s 50th film as an actor and his second as a director. The film released in cinemas worldwide today amid moderate expectations. This review explores how the film performed. Read on.

Advertisement

 

Story:

Kaartavaraayan aka Raayan (Dhanush), enjoys a quiet life in Anjanaouram with his brothers Muthuvelaraayan (Sundeep Kishan), Maanikyaraayan (Kalidas Jayaram), and sister Durga (Dushara Vijayan). Their tranquility is shattered when Muthu gets into a fight with the local don Dorai’s (Saravanan) men, setting off a dangerous rivalry. Sethuram (SJ Suryah), another gangster, steps into the fray with a deadly plan to eliminate Raayan. What drives Sethuram’s desire to kill Raayan? Who is Raayan beneath the surface? What is his true purpose? The film unveils all these secrets.

 

Plus Points:

Advertisement

Expectations were high when the film was announced, as it is directed by Dhanush. Besides his intense acting, Dhanush demonstrates his directing skills neatly.

Sundeep Kishan takes on a significant role and delivers an exceptional performance with his portrayal of a character with grey shades. His scenes with Dhanush and Aparna Balamurali are enjoyable.

Dushara Vijayan is unexpectedly strong in her role, which becomes more intense in the second half. SJ Suryah, as usual, gives an exemplary performance. Aparna Balamurali, Selvaraghavan, and others perform decently in their respective roles.

 

Minus Points:

Advertisement

The movie doesn’t offer much that’s new for viewers. Dhanush presents a routine story with very few twists, but the slow-paced screenplay diminishes the story’s impact.

There is no strong hook to illustrate the conflict between SJ Suryah and Dhanush. The reasons provided are unconvincing, and SJ Suryah’s potential is not fully utilised.

Advertisement

The film caters mainly to action movie enthusiasts and may not be suitable for family audiences due to its violent content.

Prakash Raj’s character lacks originality, and Varalaxmi Sarathkumar has minimal relevance to the plot. Additionally, including more emotional depth might have improved the film. The second half feels dragged out, with unnecessary scenes added to extend the film.

 

Technical Aspects:

As a director, writer, and actor, Dhanush displays his skills, but as a writer and director, he could have crafted a more engaging story. The sluggish second half could have been tightened.

Advertisement

Given the high expectations, AR Rahman’s work is noticeable but slightly disappointing. The cinematography by Om Prakash is decent, while editing by Prasanna GK could have been better. Production values are satisfactory.

 

Verdict:

On the whole, Raayan offers nothing new but remains passable due to the strong performances by Dhanush, Sundeep Kishan, Dushara Vijayan, and SJ Suryah. The action scenes are adequate but not suitable for family audiences. The lack of a strong hook point and a dragging second half are notable drawbacks. If you still decide to watch it, manage your expectations accordingly.

123telugu.com Rating: 2.75/5

Advertisement

Reviewed by 123telugu Team

Click Here For Telugu Review

Articles that might interest you:

Advertisement


Advertisement



Continue Reading

Trending