Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Film Review: DIG! XX – SM Mirror

Published

on

Film Review: DIG! XX – SM Mirror

DIG! XX is the reconceptualized version of one of the most celebrated rock documentaries ever made, DIG!. It is the story of The Brian Jonestown Massacre and The Dandy Warhols, two bands from the late 90s who were both considered “Next Big Things” by record company A&R representatives and label heads. It is the tale of the friendship and rivalry of the two band’s leaders, the brilliant “mad genius” Anton Newcombe, and the much more amenable and socially acceptable Courtney Taylor-Taylor, as much as it is about the fight between artists and record labels. You can watch DIG! XX online until Sunday, along with other Sundance films, on the film festival’s website.

The film’s synopsis is this: “DIG! XX is the 20th anniversary extended edition of the rock documentary DIG!, which adds new narration by The Brian Jonestown Massacre’s Joel Gion, features 40+ minutes of never-before-seen footage, and brings this epic tale to today.”

“DIG! XX looks at the collision of art and commerce through the star-crossed friendship and bitter rivalry of dueling rock bands — The Dandy Warhols and The Brian Jonestown Massacre. Through their loves and obsessions, gigs, arrests, and death threats, uppers and downers, and ultimately, their chance at a piece of the profit-driven music business, they stage a self-proclaimed revolution in the music industry.”

Ondi Timoner, director, camera operator, musician wrangler, and editor of DIG! and David Timoner, camera operator, interviewer, and editor of DIG! XX definitely deserve so much credit for spending seven years filming the documentary when the two bands were not yet as successful as they would eventually turn out to be.  The film’s images, shot on several different formats, have been gloriously upscaled, and the sound mix and quality have been enormously improved.

The Timoners filmed on faith and with the cinematic instinct that they had chosen worthy subjects. They would be rewarded beyond belief by that faith as the film went on to win the Grand Jury Prize for Documentary at Sundance 2004. They should be commended for listening to that same instinct when it came time to film. When I interviewed Ondi, she said, “So, a lot of the magic of Dig! is just kind of knowing when to show up.” The proof is in the film.

Advertisement

The screening of DIG! XX at Sundance was prefaced by a short video from fan and musician Dave Grohl of Nirvana and The Foo Fighters, who named DIG! as his favorite rock documentary and thinks just as highly of DIG! XX. Ondi has named several rock and pop legends who are fans of the film, but Grohl has gone on the record at the festival. He also said that the film shows you what it is really like to be in a band. 

Courtesy of the Sundance Institute

One thing that I would recommend to you as a viewer of the film, and I definitely recommend that everyone watch DIG! XX, a new and even better film, is to view it from the perspective of what is currently going on in our society regarding A.I. Artists, musicians, actors, fine artists, and writers are feeling the existential threat of A.I. since many people have decided that it is a way to make art and consume art without having to deal with those pesky artists. Or pay them.

People love art but seem to hate, fear, and misunderstand artists. I believe that stems from the fear that the average consumer feels when faced with the concept of the creative urge. Many want fame and approval, but putting themselves on the line in front of a crowd and exposing their emotions and vulnerabilities is something they are terrified of.

They can’t understand the creative process, and it frightens them. It also angers them that these sometimes arrogant and strange musicians and other creatives can do it. It stirs envy that curdles into a hatred of the creators, and I think this is essentially why corporations and executives, depressed about their lack of creative ability, seek to take advantage of artists and take the majority of the profit from art that is commercially available. They enjoy swindling artists that they feel inferior to because it gives the crime that extra zest. Make no mistake: the music industry has been stealing from artists for decades.

Anton Newcombe is a highly intelligent musical savant, polymath, multi-instrumentalist, musician, band leader, producer, and fine artist who has primarily been misunderstood because of his anger and dark humor. When I interviewed him for The Recording Academy, I found out how much he loves creating music and how his live shows have actually morphed into events where he puts so much energy into creating a mystical experience. 

Newcombe has also spent many years and some time in the documentary telling anyone who will listen that the music industry is a “Mafia.” If you think of some of his “antics” as being similar to the testing that Jim Morrison used to be known for, he might be slightly easier for you to understand, but remember that to him, this is a deadly serious fight for his life. Making music and art is everything to him; when he feels that his creative autonomy and survival are being threatened, he will react badly. No one else is quite like him, even though his importance in music has been likened to that of Bob Dylan by no less than Anthony Bourdain. He is one of the most extraordinary musical talents of the late Twentieth and early Twenty-first centuries.

Advertisement

When you watch DIG! Xan audience’s natural tendency is to side with the group that seems more normal and happy, The Dandy Warhols, and deride the seemingly more dangerous band, The Brian Jonestown Massacre – even though rock and roll are supposed to be dangerous. When you watch both bands snort coke, the audience seems to give the Dandies a pass and only consider BJM as the dangerous druggies. 

They’re both doing the same drugs. 

One of the advantages of DIG! XX over the original is that the Timoners added the narration of Joel Gion, The Brian Jonestown Massacre’s percussionist and frontman. The first DIG! only had the somewhat snide observations of Courtney Taylor-Taylor, where he would talk about how well-adjusted and successful his band was and what a bunch of screw-ups BJM supposedly was. Occasionally, he would admit that BJM was a better band and that Anton was more of a visionary than he, but his version of the events colored the audience’s perception in a very real way. That’s called P.R. One of the things that Taylor-Taylor and the Dandies excel at projecting an image of success and normality. Gion’s witty ripostes rip back some of the narrative control of the film and are highly entertaining and enlightening. 

The other advantage that Ondi and David Timoner gave to this update is that they could use the vast archive of footage sitting in Ondi’s garage and add scenes that give more context to the events. This is integral to this new version of the film because it shines a light on the band members’ personal motivations and, sometimes, changes scenes and the course of the film with new information. Film is a visual medium, and while voiceover and telling the audience what is happening is important, showing the audience what happened is even more crucial to storytelling.

Courtesy of the Sundance Institute

For example, in one fight that BJM had on tour in Chicago, you can see Anton peacefully napping while the others argue. Does that mean that Anton is totally innocent? No, but it does show that not all of the angry arguments involved him. DIG! XX also shows his more sensitive, gentle, and hugely magnetic side that attracts so many people. Along with the tragic sequence about his parents and their emotional neglect of Anton, it goes a long way toward showing where his anger comes from, but also why people really want to be in his orbit. 

Another is that the Timoners were also able to add newer footage almost up to the current day that shows that far from being a failure, Anton Newcombe and The Brian Jonestown Massacre had not only survived but were thriving while touring the world. One thing that happens at screenings of DIG! is that people assume that the ending means the end of BJM, which is far from the truth. 

Advertisement

It is also important to remember that musicians, as more free-thinking and emotional people, have had a tendency to engage in substances and violence. Also, when one is drinking or doing drugs, there is a pronounced tendency to behave very badly. As Courtney Taylor-Taylor observes, “When you have a pack of junkies on the road, not eating, not sleeping and drinking. A lot. Will some of them get grumpy and start fighting? No, probably not.” 

A fairly recent example of a musician engaging in violence in public is Cardi B reacting to having water thrown at her onstage and hurling her mic back at the person in the crowd. 

Joel Gion’s new narration and additional footage give some perspective to the infamous Viper Room fight, in particular, which is needed. While violence is not cool, it does put the fights in perspective. It’s not just random violence from a terrible person.

Ultimately, the crowning success of DIG! XX is the willingness of the filmmakers, Ondi and David Timoner, to go back and add so much that it creates a much more vivid and accurate portrait of the events in the two bands’ lives. It is the best and most truthful rock documentary ever made because it takes such an unflinching and honest look at what musicians do, how they create, and what it is really like to deal with the music industry, which is nothing but a trap.

The filmmaker’s choice to show the unvarnished words and actions of Newcombe, in particular, are very instructive to musicians in the audience. It is a cautionary tale, but not against sticking up for yourself as Newcombe insists on doing, in his own darkly charismatic way, but against believing what record companies are telling you and conforming to rules that only apply to some. 

Advertisement

The new edition gives the audience even more of an inkling of what Newcombe is actually saying about music industry exploitation and a view of Taylor-Taylor’s lament, “If I was just a little bit smarter.” There is also a revelation about Taylor-Taylor that takes some of the shiny halo off his head, which is only fair.  During the Q&A at Sundance, Dandy Zia McCabe also admitted that the inner workings of The Dandies were far from what was advertised as “the most well-adjusted band in the world.”

It gives the observant viewer the message that the system is exploitative and that unless you chart your own course, as difficult as that may be, you will lose. But concurrently, it tells you that you will pay a price for choosing your own path. 

DIG! XX is magnificent and fiery, an artistic telling of a story that is frequently misunderstood because of our society’s tendency to put a premium on obedience rather than free will, even in art. Highly entertaining and shocking, it delves into the artistic soul and the insecurities that artists give to themselves and, inadvertently, to the audience.

DIG! XX is truly a new film that gives the audience the opportunity to understand everyone in the two bands better and discover why they did what they did—the beauty of music up against the greed and despair of humanity’s worst urges. It also gives people a humanistic portrait of how difficult it is to be an artist in a culture that only values artistic success in the form of wealth and fame. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Hoppers’ review: Pixar’s best original movie in years

Published

on

‘Hoppers’ review: Pixar’s best original movie in years

“So it’s like Avatar?” one character quips in Disney and Pixar’s “Hoppers,” bluntly translating the film’s high-concept premise for the sugar-fueled kids in the audience. And yes, the comparison is apt. The story follows a nature-obsessed teenage girl who manages to quite literally “hop” her consciousness into the body of a robotic beaver in order to spark an animal rebellion against a greedy mayor determined to bulldoze their forest for a freeway. 

It’s a clever hook. The kind of big, elastic idea Pixar used to make look effortless. “Hoppers” does not reach the rarified air of “Up,” “Wall-E,” or “Inside Out,” but after a stretch of uneven originals like “Turning Red” and “Luca,” and outright misfires such as “Elemental” and “Elio,” this feels like a genuine course correction. The environmental messaging is clear without being preachy, the animals are irresistibly anthropomorphized, and the studio’s once-signature emotional sincerity is back in sturdy form.

Pixar can afford to gamble on originals when it has a guaranteed cash cow like this summer’s “Toy Story 5” waiting in the wings, but “Hoppers” earns its place in the catalogue. Director Daniel Chong crafts a warm, heartfelt film that occasionally strains under the weight of its own ambition, yet remains grounded by character and theme. Its meditation on conservation and animal displacement feels timely in a way that never tips into after-school-special territory.

We meet Mabel, voiced with bright conviction by Piper Curda, as a child liberating her classroom pets and returning them to the wild. Her moral compass is shaped by her grandmother, voiced by Karen Huie, who imparts wisdom about nature’s sanctity. True to both Pixar tradition and the broader Disney playbook, this beacon of guidance does not survive past the opening act. Loss, after all, is Pixar’s favorite inciting incident.

Years later, Mabel is still fighting the good fight, squaring off against the smarmy Mayor Jerry, voiced with slick menace by Jon Hamm. He plans to flatten the glade where Mabel and her grandmother once found solace. Mabel’s resistance feels noble but futile. The animals have already mysteriously vanished, the machinery is coming, and her last-ditch plan involves luring a beaver back to the abandoned forest in hopes of jumpstarting the ecosystem.

Advertisement

That’s when the film gleefully pivots into mad-scientist territory. At Beaverton University, Mabel discovers her professor, voiced by Kathy Najimy, has developed a device that can project human consciousness into synthetic animals. The process, dubbed “hopping,” allows Mabel to inhabit a robotic beaver and infiltrate the forest from within. It’s an inspired escalation that keeps the film buoyant even when the plotting grows predictable.

Her new posse includes King George, a lovably beaver voiced by Bobby Moynihan with distinct Bing Bong energy; a sharp-tongued bear voiced by Melissa Villaseñor; a regal bird king voiced by the late Isiah Whitlock Jr.; and a fish queen voiced by Ego Nwodim. As is often the case with Pixar, even in its lesser efforts, the world-building is meticulous. The animal hierarchy, complete with titles like “paw of the king,” is layered with jokes that play for kids while slyly winking at adults.

The plot ultimately follows a familiar template. Scrappy underdog rallies community. Corporate villain twirls metaphorical mustache. Emotional third-act sacrifice looms. At times, you can feel the machinery working a little too cleanly. Pixar, and Disney at large, has grown increasingly reliant on sequels and established IP, and “Hoppers” does not radically reinvent the wheel. In an animated landscape where films like “K-Pop: Demon Hunters,” “Across the Spider-Verse,” and “Goat” are pushing stylistic and narrative boundaries, being safe and sturdy may not always be enough.

And yet, there is something refreshing about a Pixar original that remembers how to tug at the heart without squeezing it dry. “Hoppers” is playful, peppered with cheeky needle drops, and builds to a sweet emotional catharsis that may or may not have left this critic a little misty-eyed. It feels earnest and engaged. 

“Hoppers” may not be top-tier Pixar. But it is a welcome return to form, a reminder that the studio still knows how to marry big ideas with a bigger heart.

Advertisement

HOPPERS opens in theaters Friday, March 6th.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Hoppers’ review: Who can argue with hilarious talking animals?

Published

on

‘Hoppers’ review: Who can argue with hilarious talking animals?

Just when you think Pixar’s petting-zoo cute new movie “Hoppers” is flagrantly ripping off James Cameron, the characters come clean.


movie review

HOPPERS

Advertisement

Running time: 105 minutes. Rated PG (action/peril, some scary images and mild language). In theaters March 6.

Advertisement

“You guys, this is like ‘Avatar’!,” squeals 19-year-old Mabel (Piper Curda), the studio’s rare college-age heroine. 

Shoots back her nutty professor, Dr. Fairfax (Kathy Kajimy): “This is nothing like ‘Avatar!’”

Sorry, Doc, it definitely is. And that’s fine. Placing the smart sci-fi story atop an animated family film feels right for Pixar, which has long fused the technological, the fantastical and the natural into a warm signature blend. Also, come on, “Avatar” is “Dances With Wolves” via “E.T.”

What separates “Hoppers” from the pack of recent Pix flix, which have been wholesome as a church bake sale, is its comic irreverence. 

Director Daniel Chong’s original movie is terribly funny, and often in an unfamiliar, warped way for the cerebral and mushy studio. For example, I’ve never witnessed so many speaking characters be killed off in a Pixar movie — and laughed heartily at their offings to boot.

What’s the parallel to Pandora? Mabel, a budding environmental activist, has stumbled on a secret laboratory where her kooky teachers can beam their minds into realistic robot animals in order to study them. They call the devices “hoppers.”  

In Pixar’s “Hoppers,” a teen girl discovers a secret device that can turn her into a talking beaver. AP

Bold and fiery Mabel — PETA, but palatable — sees an opportunity. 

The mayor of Beaverton, Jerry (Jon Hamm), plans to destroy her beloved local pond that’s teeming with wildlife to build an expressway. And the only thing stopping the egomaniacal pol — a more upbeat version of President Business from “The Lego Movie” — is the water’s critters, who have all mysteriously disappeared. 

So, Mabel avatars into beaver-bot, and sets off in search of the lost creatures to discover why they’ve left.

Advertisement

From there, the movie written by Jesse Andrews (“Luca”) toys with “Toy Story.” Here’s what mischief fuzzy mammals, birds, reptiles and insects get up to when humans aren’t snooping around. Dance aerobics, it turns out. 

Mabel (Piper Curda) meets King George (Bobby Moynihan). AP

Per the usual, “Hoppers” goes deep inside their intricate society. The beasts have a formal political system of antagonistic “Game of Thrones”-like royal houses. The most menacing are the Insect Queen (Meryl Streep — I’d call her a chameleon, but she’s playing a bug), a staunch monarch butterfly and her conniving caterpillar kid (Dave Franco). They’re scheming for power. 

Perfectly content with his station is Mabel’s new best furry friend King George (Bobby Moynihan), a gullible beaver who ascended to the throne unexpectedly. He happily enforces “pond rules,” such as, “When you gotta eat, eat.”   

That means predators have free rein to nosh on prey, and everybody’s cool with it. Because of bone-dry deliveries, like exhausted office drones, the four-legged cast members are hilarious as they go about their Animal Planet activities. 

Mayor Jerry (Jon Hamm) plans to destroy a local pond to build an expressway. AP

No surprise — talking lizards, sharks, bears, geese and frogs are the real stars here. They far outshine Mabel, even when she dons beaver attire. Much like a 19-year-old in a job interview, she doesn’t leave much of an impression. 

Advertisement

Yes, the teen has a heartfelt motivation: The embattled pond was her late grandma’s favorite place. Mabel promised her that she’d protect it. 

But in personality she doesn’t rank as one of Pixar’s most engaging leads, perhaps because she’s past voting age. Mabel is nestled in a nebulous phase between teenage rebellion and adulthood that’s pretty blasé, even if a touch of tension comes from her hiding her Homo sapien identity from her new diminutive pals. When animated, kids make better adventurers, plain and simple.

AP

“Hoppers” continues Pixar’s run of humble, charming originals (“Luca,” “Elio”) in between billion-dollar-grossing, idea-starved sequels (“Inside Out 2,” probably “Toy Story 5”). The Disney-owned studio’s days of irrepressible innovation and unmatched imagination are well behind it. No one’s awed by anything anymore. “Coco,” almost 10 years ago, was their last new property to wow on the scale of peak Pixar.

Look, the new movie is likable and has a brain, heart and ample laughs. That’s more than I can say for most family fare. “A Minecraft Movie” made me wanna hop right out of the theater.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Review | Hoppers: Pixar’s new animation is a hilarious, heartfelt animal Avatar

Published

on

Review | Hoppers: Pixar’s new animation is a hilarious, heartfelt animal Avatar

4/5 stars

Bounding into cinemas just in time for spring, the latest Pixar animation is a pleasingly charming tale of man vs nature, with a bit of crazy robot tech thrown in.

The star of Hoppers is Mabel Tanaka (voiced by Piper Curda), a young animal-lover leading a one-girl protest over a freeway being built through the tranquil countryside near her hometown of Beaverton.

Because the freeway is the pet project of the town’s popular mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who is vying for re-election, Mabel’s protests fall on deaf ears.

Everything changes when she stumbles upon top-secret research by her biology professor, Dr Sam Fairfax (Kathy Najimy), that allows for the human consciousness to be linked to robotic animals. This lets users get up close and personal with other species.

Advertisement
“This is like Avatar,” Mabel coos, and, in truth, it is. Plugged into a headset, Mabel is reborn inside a robotic beaver. She plans to recruit a real beaver to help populate the glade, which is set to be destroyed by Jerry’s proposed road.
Continue Reading

Trending