Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Dream Scenario movie review: (un)likely boogeyman – FlickFilosopher.com

Published

on

Dream Scenario movie review: (un)likely boogeyman – FlickFilosopher.com

The term “Cage rage” is used, approvingly, by fans of the over-the-top acting style that Nicolas Cage sometimes deploys in his film performances, usually in movies that feature extreme violence and explore deranged personalities: there’s lots of unhinged fury, often drenched in blood, as his eyes bulge and he screams furiously. Ethan Hawke, in a 2013 AMA on Reddit, praised Cage’s approach: “He’s the only actor since Marlon Brando that’s actually done anything new with the art of acting; he’s successfully taken us away from an obsession with naturalism.”

Indeed, Cage told Indiewire in a 2018 interview that his technique is “all very thought out and carefully planned,” an expression of his “abstract and more ontological fantasies with film performance.” So the actor finds it “frustrating” and a “disservice” to the films and his work that those performances are often detached from their cinematic contexts and edited by fans into clip collections, or supercuts: long montages of, well, Cage rage. These amuse fans. They don’t amuse Cage.

So it’s easy to see what may have drawn Cage to Dream Scenario, and why he’s so profoundly moving in it. I only wish the film was more deserving of what he’s doing here.

Thoughts on Andy Warhol’s prediction about 15 minutes of fame?

Cage (Sympathy for the Devil, Renfield) plays extremely mildmannered college professor Paul Matthews, a nobody of a man who, for mysterious and unexplained reasons, suddenly starts appearing in the dreams of people all over the world. People he doesn’t know and who have no way of knowing him. He doesn’t do anything in the dreams, just observes whatever surreal oddness is occuring. The phenomenon itself is beyond dreamlike oddness, to say the least, and once it becomes known that the strange man everyone is seeing in their dreams is the same individual, an actual real person, Paul becomes a bit of a media sensation, to his baffled but also, maybe, secretly pleased surprise.

This is not a Cage-rage performance — quite the opposite. Cage is so naturalistic, so down-to-earth that he frequently and completely appropriately induces cringes in the viewer with Paul’s utterly human awkwardness and his banal desperation to be liked. His work here is comedic in the driest, subtlest, most nakedly painful way, very much akin to his brilliant turn in 2002’s Adaptation. And it becomes even more so when “Paul’s” benign presence in people’s dreams turns nasty and violent, and suddenly this harmless schlub has become a menacing figure lodged in the collective subconscious, one that also terrifies those dreamers in a way that carries over to their waking minds.

Advertisement
Dream Scenario Nicolas Cage
Nicolas Cage’s early-morning scream of horror…

Now, it’s explicit that Norwegian writer-director Kristoffer Borgli wants to examine modern concepts of fame, especially when it is unexpected and unwanted. “How does it feel to go viral?” one of Paul’s students asks. (This is Borgli’s third feature, and his first wholly in the English language. His 2022 film Sick of Myself and his 2014 short “Internet Famous” both appear to consider similar themes; I haven’t seen either, though Sick is high on my watchlist.) But where the filmmaker takes it from here never quite gelled for me. Metaphors don’t have to be perfect analogs to be effective, of course, but it seems to me that even unexpected and unwanted fame is the result of overt actions on someone’s part, even if they never wanted those actions to be made quite so public. Just because, say, a surreptitiously shot video of an angry Karen demanding to speak to a manager went viral doesn’t mean that it’s not an accurate representation of her behavior.

But poor Paul! People are suddenly terrified of him — are, ahem, cancelling him, even — because of something that isn’t real, that he didn’t do, and that bears no resemblance whatsoever to anything he would do. Paul wouldn’t mind some recognition for his work: his field is the evolutionary biology of insects, and he has a book about “antelligence” that he’d love to write and get a little bit famous for, but he’s so ineffectual that the book is only the germ of an idea right now. Paul isn’t even a threat to his own procrastinating ineptitude, never mind to anyone else.

Cage crafts a palpable misery in Paul’s, well, stuckness in his own life, in his befuddled benign neglect of himself, and in his own clueless lack of self-awareness. This is a horror movie in which the horror is the protagonist’s own insipid inability to follow through on his ambitions, which he probably can’t even see. And there are extra layers of horror for a viewer who may see him- or her- or themself in that incredibly common aspect of Paul’s personality. Borgli and cinematographer Benjamin Loeb add to that heavy weight with a carefully studied atmosphere of intentional drabness: Paul’s reality isn’t merely mundane, it’s muted and gray.

Dream Scenario Nicolas Cage Julianne Nicholson
This is not my beautiful wife…

On the other hand, the violent dreams Paul appears in are practically parodies of memeified “Cage rage.” Surely the actor’s own displeasure with how his work is sometimes received fuels his portrayal of both dream-Paul’s outrageous violence and actual-Paul’s bewilderment at how his dream “audience” responds.

But that’s tangential, behind-the-scenes color, and not anything to do with what Dream Scenario is actually about. And, sadly, the longer Dream Scenario goes on, the less confident Borgli is about any of it. The only vibe I was getting — and this snuck up on me until it felt like an unpleasant certainty — is one not of the vagaries of fame but the terror too many men have now that our society is beginning to hold them to account for their bad behavior, such as with the #MeToo movement, and how we’re starting to talk about rape culture as a thing to be deconstructed and dismantled.

Of course, hashtag–not all men. Not Paul! He’s harmless, as we can plainly see. Wouldn’t hurt a fly, truly. And yet people — men as well as women — are suddenly afraid of him merely because they imagined him doing something awful. It’s not right. It’s unfair!

Dream Scenario
Oh, for sure, the modern world has it out for men, cannot get a break, etc….

And it is unfair. Paul doesn’t deserve what he gets here. People may behave strangely in dreams, but the way people around Paul — such as his wife, Janet (Julianne Nicholson: I, Tonya, Black Mass) — react in the dull mundanity of his real world ultimately makes little sense and feels wildly implausible. Not that fictional characters always have to deserve what they get… but what they get should at least make a sort of narrative sense. But here, either the calculus of Borgli’s tale is off and he derailed his own intriguing concept because he didn’t know where to take it… or he really is saying, “Won’t someone think of the trauma men are going through now that women have stopped pretending we don’t have good reasons to be afraid of some of you?”

Alas, it isn’t mere nightmares that have made women finally speak our truths, and even given that, no man is getting “cancelled” — not that that even actually happens, certainly not like it does for Paul here — for no reason whatsoever. Men who have done bad things are, very occasionally, having to face consequences. Plenty of men are still getting away with their crimes. Innocent men are not being targeted, unfairly or otherwise.

Advertisement

I haven’t been a fan of Cage’s “Cage-rage” performances; I’ve characterized them in the past as “indulging tropes of toxic masculinity,” though I might reconsider that in light of Hawke’s praise. But what we see in Dream Scenario, which looks a helluva lot like it’s straining to build up a strawman siege of poor Paul? That is pretty toxic.


more films like this:
• Being John Malkovich [Prime US | Prime UK | Apple TV]
• Inception [Prime US | Prime UK | Apple TV | BFI Player UK]

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

What If Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway Had a Mother-Off, and We All Lost?

Published

on

What If Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway Had a Mother-Off, and We All Lost?

The strange case of Mothers’ Instinct.
Photo: Neon

There’s a new movie starring Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway out this week, which is normally the sort of thing you’d expect to have heard about. But, after its release in the U.K. months ago, Mothers’ Instinct is slipping into U.S. theaters with as little splash as an Olympic diver nailing a triple somersault tuck. The film, a thriller directed by Benoît Delhomme, is getting the treatment typically reserved for a disaster, which is a shame, because I’ve been dying to discuss it with someone, and that’s hard when no one has any idea what you’re on about. Mothers’ Instinct is, indeed, pretty terrible, and not in the so-bad-it’s-good sense, and yet there’s something strangely moving about it. It’s a poignant example of how what looks like rich material to actors can turn out to be lousy material for audiences. Mothers’ Instinct is a remake of a 2018 Belgian film adapted from a novel by Barbara Abel, and watching it, you can appreciate exactly why these two major actors signed on to star in it. Funnily enough, those same qualities go a long way toward explaining why the movie doesn’t work.

Mothers’ Instinct isn’t camp, but it’s close enough that if you squint, you can almost see a version of the film that tips into something broader. Of course, if you squint, you wouldn’t be able to appreciate how immaculately Chastain and Hathaway are costumed. They look incredible — not like two 1960s housewives, which is what they’re playing, so much as two people who keep switching outfits because they can’t decide what to wear to the high-end Mad Men–themed party they’re headed to later. As Alice, Chastain is styled like a Hitchcock blonde in pin-curled ash updos and cardigan sets, while as Alice’s neighbor and friend Céline, Hathaway is given a Jackie O. look that involves a shoulder-length bouffant, pillbox hats, and gloves. They’re cosplayers in a gorgeous, airless setting, adjoining houses on a street that might as well be floating in space, the husbands (played by Anders Danielsen Lie and Josh Charles) vanishing to work for long stretches. The artificiality of this intensely manicured re-creation isn’t to any particular end, which gives the whole movie the air of a Don’t Worry Darling situation in which no one ever wakes up to the twist, instead sleepwalking through a stylized dream of Americana.

Advertisement

In fact, while Alice is restless over having given up her job as a journalist to take care of her son Theo (Eamon O’Connell), and Céline gets ostracized by the community after the death of her son, Max (Baylen D. Bielitz), Mothers’ Instinct isn’t actually all that interested in the pressures of living under a repressive 1960s patriarchy. Instead, it’s about another time-tested theme, one that’s best summed up as: Bitches be crazy. The perfect sheen of its surfaces — Delhomme, who’s making his directorial debut, is a cinematographer who started his career with The Scent of Green Papaya and has since worked with everyone from Tsai Ming-liang to Anton Corbijn — is paired with a score that shrieks unease from the opening scene, in which Céline is thrown a surprise birthday party. The source of this suspense isn’t revealed until later, after Max takes an unintended swan dive off the porch and the women’s friendship is threatened by grief, guilt, and suspicion. Is Céline in mourning, or does she actually irrationally blame Alice for what happened while developing an alarming fixation on Theo? Is Alice right to be suspicious of her bestie, who’s unable to have another baby, or is she being paranoid because the mental illness that previously resulted in her hospitalization has returned? Is it odd that two feminist actors jumped to participate in a film that traffics so freely in unexamined stereotypes about women and hysteria?

Not, it seems, when the opportunities to stare coldly into space or look on in glassy betrayal are this good. I’m not trying to sound snide here — the characters in Mothers’ Instinct have no convincing inner lives at all, but the exterior work of the actors playing them is choice stuff. When Alice and Céline are getting along, Chastain and Hathaway nuzzle together supportively like long-necked swans. When things start to go south, Chastain opts for an aloof distance with stricken eyes, while Hathaway prefers a labored smile that drops as soon as she’s alone. Theirs is a brittle-off no one can win, but both try their hardest anyway. The effort reaches its crescendo at Max’s funeral, where Hathaway’s enormous eyes glimmer through the barrier of a black lace veil and Chastain tilts her face up so that the elegant tracks of past tears can gleam in the light. The scene ends with Céline collapsing in anguish while Alice rushes her tantrumming child out of the church, an explosion of drama that would be so much more effective if the movie had left any room for modulation instead of starting at 10 and staying there. Mothers’ Instinct gets much sillier before it ends, but given how little it establishes as its baseline tone, it doesn’t feel fair to say it goes off the rails. Rather, as Hathaway stares brokenly into the dark and Chastain tears apart her nightstand drawer in panic, what comes to mind is how great a set of GIFs this movie will make someday. That’s not much, but I guess it’s something?

See All

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Twisters – Kenbridge Victoria Dispatch

Published

on

Movie Review: Twisters – Kenbridge Victoria Dispatch

Movie Review: Twisters

Published 11:15 am Friday, July 26, 2024

Let me immediately cut to the chase (pun intended) and answer the question you’re all wondering. TWISTERS is a fun and entertaining summer blockbuster, but it in no way holds a candle to its predecessor TWISTER (1996). Still, the CGI is intense, the sound design is loud and immersive, and the lead performances — especially from Glen Powell — are sure to wow.

Advertisement

Following a horrible tragedy, meteorologist Kate Carter (Daisy Edgar-Jones) has spent years out of the storm chasing business. She now lives in the largely tornado-less New York City, using her innate understanding of storm systems to direct weather alerts. But when her old friend Javi (Anthony Ramos) begs her to join his privately-funded start-up, which is designed to use military-grade radars to learn more about tornadoes and save communities in Oklahoma, she agrees to give him a week of her time. It’s not too long before “tornado wrangler” influencer Tyler Owens (Glen Powell) enters the scene with his ragtag group of weather enthusiasts, creating a competition between scientific research and entertainment. Each group races to be the first on the scene, with Kate and Javi seeking to model the tornado and Tyler trying to get the most likes on social media. But can the two groups find a way to work together or will the competition be more vicious than the tornadoes?

I am admittedly judging myself for caring too much about a summer blockbuster’s plot, because that’s not really what any of us sign up for with these films. But the various encounters with tornadoes begins to feel slightly repetitive and creates pacing issues, making a two-hour film feel like its runtime. And for some reason, it seems like there is something missing when it comes to portraying the sheer terror of experiencing F5 tornadoes, unlike the original film; the main set pieces were not as memorable.

The film does little to make you care about whether the characters live or die, relying on Glen Powell and Daisy Edgar-Jones’s chemistry and natural charisma to do the heavy lifting. The second Powell steps out of his gigantic truck, with his cowboy hat and belt buckle sparkling in the sun… sorry, I just lost my train of thought… and that’s what TWISTERS is hoping. Powell’s magnetism is sure to knock you off your feet and distract you from the film’s middling plot. And while Edgar-Jones’s performance is more muted, due to her character’s battle with PTSD, she brings an important level of humanity to the film and a character to both see yourself in and root for. More than that, her chemistry with Powell is off the charts and will certainly leave you wanting their relationship explored more in a sequel. The supporting characters are not given much to work with and as such, don’t really engender much concern when they are in deadly situations.

One element of TWISTERS I liked more than TWISTER is it showed the emotional and financial toll tornadoes ravage on communities. Of course, that is an element of the first film, but TWISTERS does a great job showcasing the speed in which tornadoes can overtake and devastate a community, both in loss of life and loss of property. This, juxtaposed with the “fun” in chasing storms brings a real human element to the film. I also want to give a shoutout to the movie not having any sad animal scenes (apart from a possible run-in with a chicken). So for all of you sickos excited to see another flying cow, this isn’t for you.

TWISTERS is the exact kind of movie you need to see in a theater so you can get the full experience. Where else can you admire the cinematography, get immersed in the sound design, and lose yourself in Glen Powell’s cowboy hat and million dollar smile? I saw it in a Dolby theater and was blown away.

Advertisement

There is no end credit scene.

My Review: B

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Raayan Telugu Movie Review, Dhanush, Sundeep Kishan

Published

on

Raayan Telugu Movie Review, Dhanush, Sundeep Kishan

Movie Name : Raayan

Release Date : July 26, 2024

123telugu.com Rating : 2.75/5

Starring : Dhanush, Sandeep Kishan, Kalidasu Jairam, Aparna Balamurali, SJ Surya, Saravanan

Director : Dhanush

Producers : Kalanithi Maran

Advertisement

Music Director: A. R. Rahman

Cinematographer: Om Prakash

Editor: Prasanna GK

Related Links : Trailer

Raayan is Dhanush’s 50th film as an actor and his second as a director. The film released in cinemas worldwide today amid moderate expectations. This review explores how the film performed. Read on.

Advertisement

 

Story:

Kaartavaraayan aka Raayan (Dhanush), enjoys a quiet life in Anjanaouram with his brothers Muthuvelaraayan (Sundeep Kishan), Maanikyaraayan (Kalidas Jayaram), and sister Durga (Dushara Vijayan). Their tranquility is shattered when Muthu gets into a fight with the local don Dorai’s (Saravanan) men, setting off a dangerous rivalry. Sethuram (SJ Suryah), another gangster, steps into the fray with a deadly plan to eliminate Raayan. What drives Sethuram’s desire to kill Raayan? Who is Raayan beneath the surface? What is his true purpose? The film unveils all these secrets.

 

Plus Points:

Advertisement

Expectations were high when the film was announced, as it is directed by Dhanush. Besides his intense acting, Dhanush demonstrates his directing skills neatly.

Sundeep Kishan takes on a significant role and delivers an exceptional performance with his portrayal of a character with grey shades. His scenes with Dhanush and Aparna Balamurali are enjoyable.

Dushara Vijayan is unexpectedly strong in her role, which becomes more intense in the second half. SJ Suryah, as usual, gives an exemplary performance. Aparna Balamurali, Selvaraghavan, and others perform decently in their respective roles.

 

Minus Points:

Advertisement

The movie doesn’t offer much that’s new for viewers. Dhanush presents a routine story with very few twists, but the slow-paced screenplay diminishes the story’s impact.

There is no strong hook to illustrate the conflict between SJ Suryah and Dhanush. The reasons provided are unconvincing, and SJ Suryah’s potential is not fully utilised.

Advertisement

The film caters mainly to action movie enthusiasts and may not be suitable for family audiences due to its violent content.

Prakash Raj’s character lacks originality, and Varalaxmi Sarathkumar has minimal relevance to the plot. Additionally, including more emotional depth might have improved the film. The second half feels dragged out, with unnecessary scenes added to extend the film.

 

Technical Aspects:

As a director, writer, and actor, Dhanush displays his skills, but as a writer and director, he could have crafted a more engaging story. The sluggish second half could have been tightened.

Advertisement

Given the high expectations, AR Rahman’s work is noticeable but slightly disappointing. The cinematography by Om Prakash is decent, while editing by Prasanna GK could have been better. Production values are satisfactory.

 

Verdict:

On the whole, Raayan offers nothing new but remains passable due to the strong performances by Dhanush, Sundeep Kishan, Dushara Vijayan, and SJ Suryah. The action scenes are adequate but not suitable for family audiences. The lack of a strong hook point and a dragging second half are notable drawbacks. If you still decide to watch it, manage your expectations accordingly.

123telugu.com Rating: 2.75/5

Advertisement

Reviewed by 123telugu Team

Click Here For Telugu Review

Articles that might interest you:

Advertisement


Advertisement



Continue Reading

Trending