Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Don’t Worry Darling’ Review: Burning Down the Dollhouse

Published

on

‘Don’t Worry Darling’ Review: Burning Down the Dollhouse

Quickly into the candy-colored feminist gothic “Don’t Fear Darling,” the director Olivia Wilde suggestions her hand. The film takes place in a desert city, Victory, the place every thing appears good and fairly, together with the midcentury properties on the finish of a cul-de-sac. It’s a pleasant neighborhood and, on condition that the story is ready within the Fifties, extra various than you’d count on. However Wilde lets you recognize straightaway that there’s one thing off right here: Every thing is just too tidy, too uniform and too, too good, together with the ladies’s smiles.

Shy, daring, coquettish or mocking, a girl’s smile is richly signifying, one thing that Wilde, an actress turned director, definitely is aware of. It may be a thriller, an invite, a deflection; generally it’s a reward, though one which comes with a price. “It’s the Sleeping Magnificence’s smile that crowns the efforts of Prince Charming,” as Simone de Beauvoir writes in “The Second Intercourse,” the captive princess’ gratitude validating the prince’s heroism. The lads within the film aren’t charming or heroic, but the ladies smile consistently, stretching their lipsticked mouths so extensive, it’s a marvel their faces don’t crack.

One does, although it takes an interminably very long time for the fissures to grow to be seismic. One thing begins troubling Alice (Florence Pugh) quickly after the film opens. She lives on the cul-de-sac, and like the opposite wives, she waves goodbye to her husband, Jack (Harry Kinds), as he drives off to work. At night time, cocktail in hand, Alice greets him, an impeccably coifed and dressed current that he eagerly unwraps. A lot of the remainder of the time, she cleans their home, sprucing and vacuuming and washing — the cinematography is suitably shiny and crisp — to the sound of a thriller man’s droning voice.

It’s an excellent, intriguing setup. Every thing has been buffed to gleam, together with Wilde, who performs Bunny, one among Alice’s neighbors. However you rapidly discover the dearth of mess, and particularly the relative absence of these brokers of chaos, a.ok.a. kids. There’s a contact of Stepford to this comfortable, shiny place, and a touch of comedy in its excesses. But it surely’s apparent and blunt, and early on when the wives wave bye, all following comparable choreography, I flashed on the evil planet in Madeleine L’Engle’s novel “A Wrinkle in Time,” the place every thing — homes, adults and youngsters bouncing balls — appears eerily near-identical.

Alice has clearly tumbled down a bizarre rabbit gap. However one downside with “Don’t Fear Darling” is that Wilde is so taken with the world that she’s meticulously created — with its colourful veneer, martini glasses and James Bond poster — that she will’t let it go. So, as Alice floats by means of her dream-life, Wilde exhibits off this dollhouse, taking the character to a rustic membership, onto a trolley and to go to Jack’s charismatic boss, Frank (a silkily menacing Chris Pine), whose house appears like a bachelor’s pad out of an vintage challenge of Playboy, besides that this one comes with a spouse, Shelley (Gemma Chan).

Advertisement

Frank and his male workers’ excessive deference to him counsel there’s extra to this world than its shiny exterior, as do some period-inappropriate particulars, just like the topless girl strolling poolside in public and Alice carrying solely a person’s gown shirt outdoors her entrance door. However even because the dissonance builds and Alice grasps that one thing is amiss, the film stalls. Alice turns into misplaced in thought, appears puzzled, hallucinates, appears much less puzzled and so forth as Wilde embraces a visible motif — the circle — that, after the second, third, fourth time she deploys it, loses its punch and usefulness, turning into an unintended metaphor for a film that retains returning to the identical level.

Wilde does some high-quality work right here, regardless of hammering the identical notes early and sometimes. (The screenplay is by Katie Silberman, one of many writers of “Booksmart,” Wilde’s extra profitable function directing debut.) However she isn’t a robust sufficient filmmaker at this level to navigate across the story’s weaknesses, a lot much less transcend them. That’s particularly robust on the actors, who — except for Pine — ship one-dimensional performances that by no means trace at what is likely to be churning inside their engaging heads. For her half, Pugh is just too vibrant, too alive and simply too vigorously full-bodied from the get-go for a job that requires a slow-dawning awakening.

If Pugh’s efficiency by no means will get beneath the shiny, satirical floor, it’s as a result of there’s no place for it or her to go. The film’s tackle gender roles is stinging, however its targets are amorphous (sure, agreed, sexism is unhealthy) and thoroughly nonpartisan, and its tackle the prison-house of the normal female position — what Betty Friedan known as the “comfortable housewife heroine” in her 1963 traditional “The Female Mystique” — is shallow. Many cycles of feminist progress and sexist backlash have occurred since that guide hit, however, pretty or not, the present political local weather and assaults on ladies’s rights demand greater than a intelligent mash-up between “Mad Males” and “Get Out.”

Don’t Fear Darling
Rated R for intercourse, language and violence. Operating time: 2 hours 2 minutes. In theaters.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: 'Despicable Me 4' – Catholic Review

Published

on

Movie Review: 'Despicable Me 4' – Catholic Review

NEW YORK (OSV News) – Though it comes across as somewhat unfocused, the animated comedy “Despicable Me 4” (Universal) retains much of the charm that has characterized the whole series of films to which it belongs. It’s an agreeable piece of fun that’s suitable for all but the very youngest.

This latest chapter in the adventures of Gru (voice of Steve Carell), the would-be supervillain whose heart of gold long ago turned him into a loving dad and a crimefighter, opens with him assisting in the arrest and imprisonment of French criminal Maxime Le Mal (voice of Will Ferrell). Le Mal vows vengeance on Gru’s family and manages to escape in short order.

With Le Mal on the loose, Gru and the clan — Kristen Wiig voices his sensible wife, Lucy — have to go into hiding and assume false identities. But Poppy (voice of Joey King), the daughter of their preppy, country club patronizing new neighbors, the Prescotts (voices of Stephen Colbert and Chloe Fineman), discovers their secret and uses it to blackmail Gru.

While the comic chaos wrought by Gru’s trademark Twinkie-shaped minions continues to evoke laughs, director Chris Renaud’s addition to a franchise he helped to establish goes down too many plot paths at once. Some of the details of the story — Le Mal’s goal is to kidnap infant Gru Jr., for instance — also seem a bit challenging for kids.

Genuinely objectionable ingredients are kept out of the mix. And there’s a morally interesting, though underdeveloped, subplot about the refusal of one of Gru’s adopted daughters to use the pseudonym she’s been given on the grounds that it would constitute lying.

Advertisement

Yet scenes of danger, a touch of potty humor and a minion mooning may give the parents of the littlest moviegoers pause.

The film contains characters in peril, a flash of nonhuman rear nudity and a scatological sight gag. The OSV News classification is A-I — general patronage. The Motion Picture Association rating is PG — parental guidance suggested. Some material may not be suitable for children.

Read More Movie & TV Reviews

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Ti West – 'MaXXXine' movie review

Published

on

Ti West – 'MaXXXine' movie review

Mia Goth has reprised her widely beloved role of Maxine Minx in MaXXXine, the third instalment of Ti West‘s X film series, previously comprised of 2022’s X and its prequel Pearl. Modern scream queen Goth is joined by an impressive cast, including Elizabeth Debicki, Moses Sumney, Michelle Monaghan, Halsey, Lily Collins, Giancarlo Esposito, and Kevin Bacon.

Such a roster of actors and musicians proves the kind of reputation West has earned in recent years and shows the increasing calibre of entertainment figures wanting to work with him. The real question, though, is whether the films themselves stand up to those performing in them. Three movies into his 2020s era, West has largely been revealed as a director who knows how to make a horror films look fun and flashy even if they lack originality.

MaXXXine takes place six years after the events of X as Goth’s character has left behind the “Texas porn star massacre” of the first movie to find her fame and fortune in Hollywood. Initially making her way as an adult entertainment actor, Maxine eventually finds herself making a ‘proper’ film; well, at least a dodgy horror B-movie by the name of ‘The Puritan II’, directed by Elizabeth Debicki’s domineering filmmaker, Elizabeth Bender.

At the same time, 1985 Los Angeles is suffering the crimes of notorious serial killer Richard Ramirez, dubbed in the media the ‘Night Stalker’, who appears to be targeting Maxine’s stripper and porn star buddies as his victims. MaXXXine’s Hollywood is generously doused in all the nostalgic expectations of the most excessive decade of the 20th century with neon lights on every corner, shitty horror movie rental stores (including one owned by Moses Sumney’s Leon) and a groovy soundtrack comprised of ZZ Top and, of course, Kim Carnes’ ‘Bette Davis Eyes’.

Advertisement

Narratively and aesthetically somewhat typical, then, but where MaXXXine excels the most is in its many moments of self-aware homage. At one point, our hero Maxine is chased to the Bates Motel (from Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho) on the Universal studio lot by Kevin Bacon’s seedy private eye John Labat, while a later moment sees Lily Collins’ dodgy-accented Molly Bennett have her mouth splattered with blood by Bender in a scene likely paying respect to Andrzej Zulawski’s horror classic Possession and its iconic Isabelle Adjani performance.

In addition, West seems to have fun positing the notion that horror movies in the latter part of the 1980s were deemed B at best, toying with the idea that they could never be taken seriously. Judging from the popularity of his X series, though, such a belief has been proven wrong ten times over. Still, there are a handful of issues with MaXXXine, as well as with the films that preceded it, that prevent admittance to the canon of horror greatness.

One of the film’s most engaging and genuinely exciting moments is when Maxine’s past finally catches up with her, and a motive for the entire series, which had been starkly missing (whether supernatural, religious or just downright maniacal), is finally revealed. However, by the time this antagonism finally arrives, one can’t help but feel that it’s somewhat too late and that West has only managed to deliver a pastiche of the horror world’s past with a 1980s gloss rather than provide an effort of originality or even one that genuinely feels scary.

Sure, there are some brilliantly gory set pieces, including the splattering of a man in a car crusher and the decimation of an even more unfortunate gentleman’s genitals (let’s not forget that the X series is undoubtedly feminist in tone). Still, such standout moments do not guarantee a good horror movie and West’s most recent entry seems to suffer from a lack of an overall haunting spectre or suchlike. MaXXXine is exciting, flashy, funny, sassy, self-aware and incredibly sexy, but it fails to be anything more than the sum of its parts: a neon-lit homage to the horrible history of Hollywood horror rather than a fear-inducing glimpse into the genre’s future.

Advertisement

Related Topics

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Tiny Lights’ Review: Empathetic Czech Drama Sees the World Through a Child’s Eyes

Published

on

‘Tiny Lights’ Review: Empathetic Czech Drama Sees the World Through a Child’s Eyes

If you’re lucky enough to remember memories from your early childhood, you’ll know they tend to be fragmentary, skewed from an outlook incapable of fully grasping the adult world. Czech filmmaker Beata Parkanova captures that feeling beautifully in her film receiving its world premiere at the Karlovy Vary International Film Festival. Related entirely through the viewpoint of a six-year-old girl, Tiny Lights emerges as a small gem.

It helps that the little girl, Amalka, is played by adorable child actress Mia Banko, possessing wide, saucer eyes that are endlessly expressive and long red hair of which Heidi would be jealous. In the opening scene, Amalka hears voices emanating from a closed-door room and, naturally curious, attempts to listen. She hears her grandmother angrily say to her mother, “Happiness? Save it for the fairy tales,” but she has no idea of what it means.

Tiny Lights

The Bottom Line

Skillfully observed.

Advertisement

Venue: Karlovy Vary International Film Festival
Cast: Mia Banko, Elizaveta Maximova, Marek Geisberg, Veronika Zilkova, Martin Finger
Director-screenwriter: Beata Barkanova

1 hour 16 minutes

So she goes to play with her very submissive cat, apparently named Mr. Cat. But she tests Mr. Cat’s patience by putting him inside a wooden chest, from which her grandfather (Martin Finger) soon rescues him. She returns to the room, and when she opens the door, the adults grow silent. “I’m bored,” Amalka says petulantly, and her grandmother (Veronika Zilkova) tries to assuage her by promising that she’ll take her to the lake that afternoon.

After naughtily picking flowers that we later learn came from a neighbor’s garden, Amalka has soup for lunch, unaware of the tensions surrounding her. Her grandparents live up to their promise by taking her to the lake, where her grandfather teaches her how to dive. They hike in the woods and pick blueberries, but Amalka throws a tantrum when told they have to leave.

Advertisement

And so the film goes, with Amalka trying to amuse herself as the adults seem to be engaged in tense confrontations, especially when her mother (Elizaveta Maximova) shows up with a strange French man and announces that she’s going with him to Prague. Amalka, of course, doesn’t comprehend what’s happening except when it relates to her, as when her father (Marek Geisberg) gently upbraids her for picking the flowers and tells her that she’ll have to apologize to the neighbor. As the day ends, she goes to bed, unaware of the fissure in her parents’ relationship, and her father wearily reads her a bedtime story that she’s heard a thousand times before but clearly still finds fascinating.

Even with its brief running time, Tiny Lights demands a certain degree of patience with its intense focus on banal childhood preoccupations. The filmmaker also indulges in stylistic flourishes — principally quick inserted shots that look like they were captured on 8mm and feature a series of close-up views of objects and facial features ­— that are more distracting than illuminating. The strained attempts at artiness just feel self-conscious.

But for most of the film’s running time, Parkanova maintains tight control over her material, making us fully identify with little Amalka and her preoccupations. The film presents things from her viewpoint, even physically; DP Tomas Juricek often places the camera low down, aligning with her diminutive size. The story takes place over the course of a single day, and its poignancy derives from the fact that we, if not Amalka, are fully aware that her life is going to change, possibly forever.

Or maybe she does realize it, as evidenced by the haunting, lingering final shot, in which we see the silhouette of her body as she peers through the large windows of her bedroom, as if trying to see the world beyond her limited perspective.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending