Connect with us

Movie Reviews

Darren Aronofsky’s The Whale is hate disguised as tough love

Published

on

Darren Aronofsky’s The Whale is hate disguised as tough love

Polygon has a group on the bottom on the 2022 Toronto Worldwide Movie Competition, reporting on the horror, comedy, drama, and motion motion pictures meant to dominate the cinematic dialog as we head into awards season. This evaluate was printed together with the movie’s TIFF premiere.

A24’s The Whale drops all of Darren Aronofsky’s worst tendencies right into a fats go well with. It’s an train in abjection within the mode of Aronofsky’s torturous Requiem for a Dream, nevertheless it’s targeted on an much more susceptible goal than Requiem’s addicts. It’s additionally stuffed with the pet biblical wankery of Mom!, Noah, and The Fountain, however centered on a Christ determine whose masochistic superpower is to soak up the cruelty of everybody round him and retailer it safely inside his large body.

To be honest, some folks get pleasure from this sort of miserabilism. However these viewers are additionally warned that not solely is that this movie troublesome to endure and more likely to be actively dangerous to some audiences, it’s additionally a self-serving reinforcement of the established order — which is among the most boring issues a film could be.

For a film that, in probably the most beneficiant studying doable, encourages viewers to contemplate that perhaps there’s a painful backstory behind our bodies they contemplate “disgusting” (the film’s phrase), The Whale appears to have little curiosity within the perspective of its protagonist, Charlie (Brendan Fraser). Charlie is a middle-aged divorcé dwelling in a small residence someplace in Idaho, the place he teaches English composition courses on-line. Charlie by no means turns his digicam on throughout lectures, as a result of he’s fats — very fats, round 600 kilos. Charlie has bother getting round with out a walker, and he has adaptive gadgets like grabber sticks stashed round his home.

If an alien landed on Earth and questioned whether or not the human species discovered its largest members engaging or repellent, The Whale would clearly talk the reply. Aronofsky turns up the foley audio each time Charlie is consuming, to emphasise the moist sound of lips smacking collectively. He performs ominous music below these sequences, so we all know Charlie’s doing one thing very dangerous certainly. Fraser’s neck and higher lip are perpetually beaded with sweat, and his T-shirt is soiled and coated in crumbs. At one level, he takes off his shirt and slowly makes his strategy to his mattress, sagging rolls of prosthetic fats dangling off his physique as he slouches towards the digicam just like the tough beast he’s. In case viewers nonetheless don’t get that they’re supposed to search out him disgusting, he recites an essay about Moby-Dick and the way a whale is “a poor huge animal” with no emotions.

Advertisement

And that’s simply what Aronofsky communicates about him by means of the movie’s directing. The story in The Whale’s first half is a gauntlet of humiliation, starting as an evangelical missionary named Thomas (Ty Simpkins) walks in on Charlie as he’s having a coronary heart assault, homosexual porn nonetheless taking part in on his laptop computer from a pathetic try at masturbation. Charlie’s nurse and solely good friend, Liz (Hong Chau), is usually variety to him, though she allows him with meatball subs and buckets of fried hen. So is Thomas, though he’s much less all in favour of Charlie as an individual than as a soul to save lots of. However Charlie’s 17-year-old daughter Ellie (Sadie Sink) brazenly despises him, and says probably the most vicious issues she will be able to consider to punish Charlie for leaving her and her mother, Mary (Samantha Morton), when Ellie was 8.

Aronofsky and author Samuel D. Hunter (adapting his personal stage play) don’t reveal the condescending level of all of this till the second half of the film: Charlie is a saint, a Christ determine, the fats man who so cherished the world that he let folks in his life deal with him like full dogshit with a purpose to absolve them of their hatred, and him of his sins. In the meantime, a subplot involving Thomas’ previous life in Iowa makes the weird assertion that persons are really attempting to assist once they deal with others unkindly, which may solely be true if the goal of that hostility doesn’t know what’s good for them. So which is it? Ought to an individual flip the opposite cheek, or be merciless to be variety? Relies on whether or not they’re fats, it appears. Charlie by no means feedback on different characters’ smoking and consuming, however they certain do touch upon his weight.

Maybe probably the most irritating factor about The Whale is how shut it involves some kind of perception. Aronofsky and Hunter simply wanted to indicate some empathy and curiosity about folks Charlie’s dimension, fairly than paternalistically guessing at their motivations. The principle perpetrator here’s a plot level the place Charlie refuses to go to the hospital, despite the fact that his blood stress is dangerously excessive and he’s displaying signs of congestive coronary heart failure. At first, he lies to Liz and says he doesn’t have the cash to pay the large medical payments he’d rack up as an uninsured affected person. Then it emerges that Charlie has greater than $100,000 tucked away in financial savings.

Advertisement

Picture: Niko Tavernise/A24

Advertisement

The Whale understands this as a mixture of selflessness — he’s hoping to offer that cash to Ellie after he dies — and suicidality. What offers away Aronofsky and Hunter’s projection about Charlie’s motivations is that intensive research have proven why overweight sufferers keep away from medical remedy, and it has nothing to do with self-sacrificing messiah-complex bullshit. Medical doctors are simply merciless to fats folks — and disproportionately more likely to dismiss, demean, and misdiagnose them.

The opposite irritating factor is that Brendan Fraser is definitely a major asset within the title function. He performs Charlie as a wise, humorous, considerate man who loves language and creativity, and refuses to let the tragic circumstances of his life flip him right into a cynic. He sees the most effective in everybody, even Ellie, whose insults he counters with affirmations and assist. (She’s hurting, you see.) Fraser’s eyes are variety, and his eyebrows are furrowed with disappointment and fear.

But when there’s any rage behind these eyes, we don’t see it. If Charlie is simply telling folks what they need to hear in hopes of minimizing their abuse, that doesn’t translate. The movie appears happy along with his surface-level protestations that he’s nice and joyful and only a naturally optimistic man, which once more betrays its lack of curiosity in Charlie’s interior emotional life — Fraser’s delicate try to discover a man contained in the image however.

Aronofsky and his group are extra all in favour of their very own cleverness. A few of the barbs thrown round in Charlie’s residence are literally fairly humorous. (The film brazenly reveals its theatrical roots: The complete story takes place throughout the confines of Charlie’s residence and entrance porch.) Chau particularly brings a prickly heat to her function as Liz, the kind of good friend whose love language is playful insults, and whose goal in life is as a fierce defender. Liz is hurting, too, after all; everyone seems to be right here. However whereas everyone seems to be hurting, Charlie has to endure probably the most for it.

In case you have a look at The Whale as a fable, its ethical is that it’s the duty of the abused to like and forgive their abusers. The film thinks it’s saying, “You don’t perceive; he’s fats as a result of he’s struggling.” But it surely finally ends up saying, “You don’t perceive; now we have to be merciless to fats folks, as a result of we are struggling.” Aronofsky and Hunter’s biblical metaphor apart, fats folks didn’t volunteer to function repositories for society’s rage and contempt. Nobody agrees to be bullied so the bully can really feel higher about themselves — that’s a self-serving lie bullies inform themselves. That is an externally imposed martyrdom, which negates the purpose of the train.

Advertisement

In The Whale, Aronofsky posits his sadism as an mental experiment, difficult viewers to search out the humanity buried below Charlie’s thick layers of fats. That’s not as benevolent of a premise as he appears to assume it’s. It proceeds from the idea {that a} 600-pound man is inherently unlovable. It’s like strolling as much as a stranger on the road and saying, “You’re an abomination, however I really like you anyway,” in step with the robust pressure of self-satisfied Christianity that the movie purports to critique. Viewers members get to stroll away pleased with themselves that they shed a couple of tears for this disgusting whale, whereas gaining no new perception into what it’s really wish to be that whale. That’s not empathy. That’s pity, buried below a thick, smothering layer of contempt.

The Whale will debut in theaters on Dec. 9.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘The Village Next to Paradise’ Review: Somali Family Drama Doubles as a Potent Portrait of Life in the Shadow of War

Published

on

‘The Village Next to Paradise’ Review: Somali Family Drama Doubles as a Potent Portrait of Life in the Shadow of War

Mo Harawe’s debut feature The Village Next to Paradise is a haunting offering. The film, which premiered at Cannes in the Un Certain Regard section and is the first Somali film to ever screen on the Croisette, presents a compelling narrative of one family’s survival in a sleepy Somali town. But it’s the devastating backdrop against which their drama plays out that lingers long after the credits roll. 

The siren wails of drones soundtrack each scene of Harawe’s film, which opens with footage of a real-life report of a United States drone strike on Somalia. Since the U.S. began using drones in the East African country in the early 2000s, Somalis have suffered at the hands of an enveloping and ravenous counterterrorism operation. According to data from the New America foundation, there have been more than 300 documented uses of drones resulting in hundreds of known civilian deaths.

The Village Next to Paradise

The Bottom Line

Uneven but affecting.

Advertisement

Venue: Cannes Film Festival (Un Certain Regard)
Cast: Ahmed Ali Farah, Ahmed Mohamud Saleban, Anab Ahmed Ibrahim
Director-screenwriter: Mo Harawe

2 hours 13 minutes

The fatal impact of contemporary warfare organizes life in Paradise village, a locale whose name seems more melancholic with time. Marmargade (Ahmed Ali Farah), a principal character in Harawe’s languorous film, makes money doing odd jobs, but one of his most lucrative gigs involves burying the dead. Some of the people for whom he finds a place in the sandy terrain died of natural causes, but many of them are victims of foreign airstrikes. When this business slows, Marmargade reluctantly smuggles a truck full of goods — the contents of which play a pivotal role later — to a nearby city. 

Because Marmargade knows the realities of living in a place shrouded by the shadow of death, he strives for a better life for his son Cigaal (Ahmed Mohamud Saleban), a buoyant kid who thinks nothing of the constant buzzing coming from the sky. When the local school cancels classes for the year because of chronic absenteeism among the teachers, Marmargade works to send Cigaal to a school in the city, where safety is more than an illusion. But Cigaal doesn’t want to leave his family, friends or his life in the village. When Marmargade proposes this new life to him, the child rejects the idea. 

Advertisement

The main narrative of The Village Next to Paradise revolves around the conflicting desires within this makeshift family. Marmargade lives with his sister Araweelo (Anab Ahmed Ibrahim), a recently divorced woman who wants to build her own tailoring shop. The two have the kind of fractious relationship resulting from years of mistrust. She thinks her brother should be honest with Cigaal instead of trying to trick the young one into going to school. Marmargade wants his sister’s financial support more than her advice. After she refuses to lend him the money for tuition, Marmargade makes a series of decisions that threatens all their livelihoods. 

Harawe’s film contains many admirable elements. With its unhurried pacing and tender focus on a single family, The Village Next to Paradise recalls Gabriel Martins’ 2022 feature Mars One. And the way Harawe structures the film around a broader geopolitical conflict resembles the role the Chadian civil war played in Mahamet Saleh Haroun’s  2010 film A Screaming Man, which also premiered at Cannes. The cinematography (by Mostafa El Kashef) offers truly striking images that conjure up the ghostly atmosphere of this village without turning its people into caricatures for a Western gaze hungry for a particular kind of poverty porn. 

But The Village Next to Paradise is also hobbled in places by its meandering narrative and occasionally wooden performances from Harawe’s cast of local nonprofessional actors. The sharpness of Harawe’s vision is dulled by a story that takes one too many detours before settling into itself. Characters with dubious relevance are introduced and then dropped, while ones who come to play crucial roles don’t get an appropriate amount of screen time.

The film becomes more dynamic in its latter half, when Marmargade’s desperation leads him to questionable decisions that clash with Araweelo’s desires. Indeed, it’s also during these parts of the film that Harawe pulls the strongest performances from his actors, who otherwise struggle to shake off an understandable stiffness. 

Despite these flaws, Harawe’s film does have a real staying power. The Village Next to Paradise orients itself around a quiet optimism and surprising humor that mirror real life. There are moments throughout that serve as a reminder that even in places where death feels close, hope for tomorrow is still alive.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Short Film Review: Karita (2023) by Virginia de Witt and Koji Ueda

Published

on

Short Film Review: Karita (2023) by Virginia de Witt and Koji Ueda

“So I came here…”

Headed by actress-turned-director Virginia de Witt and Koji Ueda, a Kyoto-born Tokyo-based director, photographer, and filmmaker, “Karita” is a film inspired by the manga series “Nana”, while trying to answer the question, what if “Lost in Translation” was cast with the “Fleabag” character. The 17-minute short will be premiering at the Dances With Films Festival on June 22nd in Los Angeles.

The film begins with a series of impressive images from nighttime Tokyo, while the ominous music suggests that something dangerous is about to happen. The next scene has two women walking in the streets during the day, as Nico, an American, is shown around Tokyo by her friend
and supervisor at a local record store, Rumi. The camera is shaky and the cuts frantic, while there is a different dialogue heard in the background. The next, dominated by neon pink lights scene, brings us to the location the dialogue is taking place, inside a bar, where the two girls are talking to two boys and one girl, with Nico asking them if they have ever done anything dangerous. One of the boys, Ren, starts talking about people stealing cars. Nico shares her own experience in the US, which makes everyone in the table rather amused.

The night continues with a lot of drinking and eventually, Rumi decides to go home, cautioning her friend not to do anything stupid, before she goes. The next scene takes place in a garage with a sports car, which belongs to the uncle of the second of the boys in the company, Kenji. Suki, the other girl, who is quite drunk, insists they take the car for a drive, despite the yakuza-like uncle having specifically cautioned his nephew otherwise. In the end, with Ren in the driver’s seat, they take a drive around Tokyo.

Advertisement

Unfolding much like a road-movie/music video, “Karita” will definitely stand out due to its impressive visuals, with Koi Ueda’s cinematography, in combination with the impressive lighting and coloring, capturing night time Tokyo in the most impressive fashion. Curtis Anthony Williams’s frequently frantic editing also adds to this sense, while the rather fast pace definitely suits the overall aesthetics here.

At the same time, there is a part of the movie that is quite realistic as the group visit various locations, as a pier, a convenience store, the record store, and the aftermaths of getting drunk and doing stupid things is also highlighted. A pinch of humor, as in the whole concept of the uncle and Suki’s actions, and some notions of romance, cement the rather entertaining narrative here.

Virginia de Witt plays the foreigner that tries to appear cool in order to fit in with gusto, while Haruka Hirata as Rumi is quite convincing as the “cautious” friend, with the chemistry of the two also being on a very high level, presenting a rather kawaii relationship between them. The other actress that stands out here is Mika Ushiko, who is quite convincing as the drunk Suki.

As mentioned before though, the aspect that makes “Karita” stand out is definitely its production values, which are on a level very rarely met in short films, while being the main reason the movie definitely deserves a watch. All in all, a very appealing film, in an effort that intrigues on what the filmmakers could do with a bigger budget in their hands, that would allow them to explore the script and the characters more.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Woof Woof Daddy: Aaron Kwok plays a reincarnated mutt in doggy mess

Published

on

Woof Woof Daddy: Aaron Kwok plays a reincarnated mutt in doggy mess

1/5 stars

Filmmakers’ relationship with dogs over the years has proved just as rewarding as other people’s bond with their loyal, four-legged companions. They have produced classic weepies (Old Yeller), thrilling adventures (The Call of the Wild), uproarious comedies (Beethoven), and countless animated favourites.

Asian cinema has supplied many memorable entries, including Hachiko and Koreyoshi Kurahara’s Antarctica, both of which inspired Hollywood remakes.

The secret to a compelling canine caper is either brilliantly trained animal performers or engaging animated characters – whatever effectively brings a dog’s personality to the fore – and showing them having meaningful relationships with human characters around them.

Sadly, Aaron Kwok Fu-shing’s new movie Woof Woof Daddy accomplishes none of this; it is an underwhelming combination of lazy writing, unlikeable performances and woefully subpar visual effects.

There is so much wrong with the film it is difficult to know where to begin. Suffice to say that, even within the fuzzy lines of its own insultingly half-baked premise, the film does not make a lick of sense.

Advertisement

Kwok plays single father Siwang, who moonlights as a rock star between shifts at a confectionery factory. His only fan is his nine-year-old daughter Lulu (Xing Yunjia), who is left to fend for herself when Siwang is killed in a freak accident.

Banished to the afterlife, the desperate dad rebels against his assigned fate and, 24 years later, is magically reincarnated as a puppy.

Xing Yunjia as a young Lulu (centre) in a still from Woof Woof Daddy.

With remarkable ease he tracks down Lulu (Lyric Lan Yingying), who is a failing pop singer trapped in a loveless engagement to her sleazebag manager (Darren Wang Da-lu).

Siwang muscles his way back into Lulu’s, determined to help his daughter get back on her feet, despite being trapped in a small furry body.

Chief among Woof Woof Daddy’s many failings is its visual effects; the dog looks absolutely rotten, even for a modestly budgeted mainland Chinese quickie like this.

Advertisement

On the page, the film fares even worse. Siwang the dog is essentially magic: he walks on two legs, holds objects between his paws, and responds to literally anything said to him; he even plays the guitar. Yet nobody bats an eyelid.

Why Siwang does not make Lulu a millionaire simply by existing is never discussed. All director Kexin Lu Ke deems to be of value is Kwok’s immature father earning a redemptive reunion with his daughter; that, and the fact the dog lays a few scatological poop jokes along the way.

Lyric Lan (front) as the adult Lulu in a still from Woof Woof Daddy.

Laboured from start to finish, Woof Woof Daddy is one bad dog that deserves to go straight to the pound.

Want more articles like this? Follow SCMP Film on Facebook
Continue Reading

Trending