Connect with us

Movie Reviews

‘Bottle Radha’ movie review: Guru Somasundaram powers a scathing drama that goes for heart over intellect

Published

on

‘Bottle Radha’ movie review: Guru Somasundaram powers a scathing drama that goes for heart over intellect

The opening of Bottle Radha is an overhead shot of Chennai, with a speaker somewhere playing ‘Thanni Thotti’ from Sindhu Bhairavi (it’s a staple booze anthem in Tamil). There are over a dozen shots of alcohol being poured into glasses in this film, and of men downing bottle after bottle to the point you wonder how they are even alive. Towards the end, there is a bar song with men dancing ecstatically. But before you jump to conclusions, this isn’t the film that celebrates alcoholism.

Debutant director Dhinakaran Sivalingam’s film is a two-hour drama that persistently focuses on the prevalent issue of alcohol addiction. That bar song I mentioned? It’s an intriguing tactic to send a dark message, in a medium that has often used such songs to celebrate boozing.

Radhamani a.k.a Sorakkapalyam Radha (Guru Somasundaram) is a middle-aged man who spends much of his time and money in the liquor shop, chugging bottles and engaging in petty quarrels. He is a deadbeat with no redeeming qualities, and Sivalingam holds no bars in depicting the flaws of his protagonist. Radha appears drunk even at his work site, and his job as a construction worker is an irony by itself. He knows nothing about building a home — the one you build with affection, responsibility, a longing for peace and comfort, and a million other little things — but claims to be an expert in building houses — empty structures made with bricks, cement and sand that are brought to life by families. That he builds houses for other families while squandering the future of his wife Anjalam (a fantastic Sanchana Natarajan) and their two kids says a subtle something about who alcoholism more often ends up affecting, and the whys and hows of its prevalence among the working-class (in umpteen instances, the film humorously points out how many addicts refuse to take responsibility because “it’s the government that has a liquor shop every corner,” but it also shows what easy accessibility can do to addicts in recovery).

In an unexpected turn for Radha, his wife, tired of making this ill-behaved man see some sense, forcibly enrols him in a one-of-a-kind de-addiction centre. In a dilapidated room are lodged dozens of addiction patients. Much of these initial portions are treated with humour, and many scenes featuring Lollu Sabha Maaran leave you in splits. However, this de-addiction centre is where issues with Bottle Radha also begin. Firstly, many of the characters we see in this de-addiction centre add nothing to our understanding of how these places function, or what goes in the mind of an addict.

Bottle Radha (Tamil)

Director: Dhinakaran Sivalingam

Advertisement

Cast: Guru Somasundaram, Sanchana Natarajan, John Vijay, Lollu Sabha Maaran

Runtime: 146 minutes

Storyline: An alcoholic gets stuck in a vortex that sucks all happiness from his life, and ends up seeking help at a de-addiction centre

Ashokan (John Vijay) runs the place with a firm, fair hand — he minces no words when the patients justify their acts and reprimands his subordinate Elango, a strange man with a compulsion for cruelty. But except for a patient’s passing remark on the centre’s budget, we are never told what Ashokan feels about the concerning state of this strange place. As much as they help the film’s humour, the patients add little value to Radha’s story. Also, what was the point of that romance between two mentors that goes nowhere? Sure, Elango’s case, and the sorry state of his victims, paint a stark picture of how these centres function, but what good does it do when we don’t understand what goes behind Elango’s hunger for power? You also wonder if Elango’s violence towards a patient had to be so excessive. Similar is the case with a scene in which The Shawshank Redemption is played at the centre; though you are impressed by this fresh take on a timeless classic, you are left with a sense of unease in how the sequence ends.

Bottle Radha chooses heart over intellect, relying solely on drama to do all the heavy lifting, and ends up offering scattered returns. In one of the hard-hitting stretches, Radha is consumed by darkness, anything resembling light devoured by his almost life-threatening addiction. His bloodshot eyes mince all that self-loathing into a contempt for the world, and you almost forget that this is an enactment. No slight emotions escape Guru Somasundaram’s face, and many scenes feature the performer pouring his heart out. Yet, in another scene, when he listens to a man open up on how alcoholism destroyed his family, Somasundaran appears….only as Somasundaram. Make no mistake, the issue isn’t with the actor; in fact, it is he who powers the film to become something more than what it settles to be.

Advertisement

The performance appears as such because the story’s didactic pursuit leads to many contrived situations and scenes. The film is so focused on taking us through the highs and lows of Radha’s alcoholism that it forgets to make him whole. This is disappointing because in a scene he tells Anjalam about how despite starting his days with a lot of resoluteness to not drink, ‘something’ pulls him back to the bottle. This something sometimes is external — like his friend Shake (Pari Elavazhagan) whose idea of a grand death is to die drinking — but except for a detail about his childhood, we don’t get much to understand the internal struggle of Radha. The film repeatedly tells us that every time he feels low, he goes on a bender and that he hasn’t seen all that lies beyond the bottle. But why does he chase the high of alcohol in the first place? Is it after a sense of security? Or, does it come from having grown up without a proper support system? Or maybe a disease is a disease and it can never be understood; maybe it’s a vortex to oblivion, but if that’s the case, why can’t we see, say, Ashokan speak about all that?

A still from ‘Bottle Radha’

A still from ‘Bottle Radha’
| Photo Credit:
Think Music India/YouTube

ALSO READ:‘Kudumbasthan’ movie review: Manikandan maintains his winning streak with this entertaining comedy caper

Instead, all we get are repetitions of Radha’s drinking, relapses and otherwise, and after a point, you hardly care about what lies ahead of him. Fascinatingly, you are more drawn towards the story of Anjalam and how she deals with this precarious marriage. Her arc wonderfully underlines how alcoholism, like most other social crises, affects women from poorer sections of society. In one of the initial scenes, a police officer warns Anjalam of punishment, pinning responsibility on her for how her husband behaves; in another heartbreaking scene with splendid performances, she heartbrokenly confesses all that she endured in the absence of her deadbeat husband. How her arc shapes up might be a tad too predictable, but what she stands for compels you to look beyond the flaws in the film.

The flaws, however, don’t diminish the importance of a film like Bottle Radha. And for a feature debutant, this is a commendable start by Sivalingam. As in a beautiful scene between Anjalam and Radha in the rain, many moments hint at a filmmaker with a lot of heart and ambition.

Bottle Radha is currently running in theatres

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

‘Minecraft’ Movie Reviews Are In, And A Billion Dollar Haul Is Nigh

Published

on

‘Minecraft’ Movie Reviews Are In, And A Billion Dollar Haul Is Nigh

I’m not sure I’ve seen worse trailers than the spots that have aired for A Minecraft Movie, the live-action hybrid of the famed video game starring Jack Black and Jason Momoa. Now, reviews are in for what looked like a likely disaster of a movie and they are…honestly, better than expected.

No, the Minecraft movie did not reach “fresh” among critics, but it does have a 53% score, a coinflip over which critics liked it and which did not. The trailer told me it didn’t look like a movie that would grab above a 20%, but there is reportedly chemistry between Black and Momoa, a great Jennifer Coolidge subplot, and there are enough fun integrations with the game to be enjoyable, bad greenscreens or otherwise.

Why do I believe that Minecraft is headed toward a billion dollar haul at the box office despite middling reviews? Two main reasons:

  • This is Minecraft, we’re talking about, the literal best-selling game in the history of time, moving an estimated 300 million units since its debut in 2011, becoming a childhood staple of million of kids across the world as they’ve grown up, and it remains hugely popular to this day. And Minecraft fans are not picking apart the quality of greenscreens in a trailer. They see their beloved world, they see Jack Black being silly, they see Jason Momoa in a funny outfit and that’s enough. Reportedly, estimates have opening weekend at $135 million to $150 million globally on a $150 million budget.
  • Second, this is almost exactly what happened with The Super Mario Bros. Movie. The animated feature that had a close to identical 59% critic scores, but a stellar 95% audience score among fans who were always going to love the (admittedly somewhat average) movie no matter what. Super Mario Bros. went on to earn $1.3 billion globally. While Mario is a massive video game icon, do not underestimate how iconic Minecraft itself is among a certain generation (or two). I doubt that Minecraft will top Mario Bros., but can it hit a billion dollars? My guess is yes.

There are just some things that movie critics and snobbier viewers don’t “get,” and much of the time, that has been video game adaptations that are beloved by either core gamers or young audiences that are allowed to be just “okay”.” I’m also reminded of the $291 million that Five Nights at Freddy’s earned on an impossibly small budget. This happens more often than you think, and I think we are definitely on the way to this happening with Minecraft, and of course, that will mean sequels are in tow.

Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, Bluesky and Instagram.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

A Minecraft Movie (2025) – Movie Review

Published

on

A Minecraft Movie (2025) – Movie Review

A Minecraft Movie, 2025.

Directed by Jared Hess.
Starring Jason Momoa, Jack Black, Danielle Brooks, Emma Myers, Sebastian Hansen, Jennifer Coolidge, Rachel House, Matt Berry, Kate McKinnon, Jemaine Clement, Valkyrae, Jared Hess, and Jens Bergensten.

SYNOPSIS:

Four misfits are suddenly pulled through a mysterious portal into a bizarre, cubic wonderland that thrives on imagination. To get back home, they’ll have to master this world while embarking on a quest with an unexpected, expert crafter.

Advertisement

Sometime after siblings Henry (Sebastian Hansen) and Natalie (Emma Myers) inadvertently discover the Overworld, where everything from buildings to environments to animals to food to other random objects are block-shaped, the former uses his child genius creativity to instantly start building elaborate constructions, as one does in the mostly plotless, sandbox video game Minecraft, but his sister struggles. She criticizes him for being a regular screwup in the real world (a heat-of-the-moment outburst she immediately regrets) while proclaiming that none of this makes any sense. Her character practically feels like a vessel for those of us coming into director Jared Hess’ A Minecraft Movie with minimal exposure.

However, despite never having played the game, I know one thing through cultural osmosis: it is intended to encourage and foster creativity in children and teenagers, which Jared Hess understands. That’s not to say the movie is any good, but “getting it” is a rarity regarding video game adaptations. It’s wonderful that this is an adaptation in conversation with not only why the games are popular, but that parents (in the case of this film, a slightly older sister looking after her younger brother while still grieving the loss of their mother) wrongfully assume that it’s a waste of time and rotting their brains, failing to realize that the game is entirely built on imagination and whatever the player wants it to be.

The punishment of removing or deleting a child’s Minecraft world is admittedly an over-the-top punishment that not only refuses to engage with the game itself but also with what they are getting from the world-building experience. It’s an instant, permanent removal of something unique, most likely impossible to duplicate. Hence, the shattering feeling of losing an entire world. Sure, it’s digital, but was lovingly put together by a human.

Jared Hess unfortunately doesn’t necessarily get to do much with this, as one imagines a gun held to he and his overcrowded screenwriting team’s (Chris Bowman, Hubbel Palmer, Neil Widener, Gavin James, and Chris Galletta) heads forcing them to shove Easter eggs and references down viewers’ throats in every single CGI, green-screened to hell and back image. This is mainly done through Jack Black portraying Steve, the default avatar from the game’s original launch (in games like these, players are encouraged to customize and project their personality onto the character), which obnoxiously amounts to that star playing himself, shouting out locations, objects, and enemy types with the demented energy of someone who just got done chugging five Red Bulls and is yelling all of this into your ear at 7 AM on a Monday when your alarm for work has gone off.

Perhaps that sounds like a hypercritical complaint after acknowledging an individual’s identity is meant to be grafted onto the avatar, but Jack Black is insufferable here. This is an embarrassing use of star power, serving as nothing more than a means to get a cheap pop out of the fans, which is especially fitting terminology since there is a scene that takes place in a wrestling ring. Everyone else will likely sit there dumbfounded. Surprisingly, they won’t necessarily be confused (most items, gear, and tools are self-explanatory), but speechless at the excessive depths of fan service. At the same time, a couple of interesting characters and ideas are ignored.

Advertisement

Other characters include Jason Momoa’s real-world faded superstar legendary arcade gamer Garrett “The Garbage Man” Garrison, a cocky dimwit facing foreclosure on his gaming store. Through some chance interactions with Henry, he also ends up in the Overworld, hoping to find some treasures to solve his financial woes. Initially, it’s also amusing that the character is a skilled cooperative gamer who routinely messes up inside a fantasy world while failing to work together. However, like most aspects of A Minecraft Movie, this aspect is worn down and tiring.

Similarly, this is an action-packed adventure with a number of explosions on par with a Michael Bay film, except they rarely look visually exciting here since the bright nature of the world and commercial-like photography causes every image to appear fake with washed-out colors. There is strong attention to detail regarding the aesthetics and designs, but this is otherwise a hideous film; one can’t help but wonder what could have been done using more practical effects. There is no wonderment or movie magic here, with no suspension of disbelief that everyone didn’t spend several hours a day in front of a green screen. Once in a while, there is a moderately entertaining sequence, such as a chase in a minecart that runs off a special type of energy, but it’s often weightless and doesn’t pop.

Rounding out the set of main characters is Dawn, a real estate agent, settling Henry and Natalie into their new home. Struggling to pay the bills, she works numerous jobs, including one working with animals, which is handy when finding herself in the Overworld. She is also a consistently funny presence and the only one not overdoing their role into flat-out annoyance.

Together, they must search for a magical object to reopen a portal that will take them home, while aiding Steve in a war against the Nether world’s evil pig race, led by their leader, Malgosha (a voiceover performance by Rachel House). Speaking of Steve, his basic origins as a real-world person and years in the Overworld could have been an entire movie alone. Thankfully, it isn’t, because Jack Black is already irritating enough here. Still, it goes to show the lengths to which A Minecraft Movie goes in cramming in as much as possible, with zero consideration as to what it serves in the context of a narrative. 

Unsurprisingly, A Minecraft Movie‘s most inspired moments involve creativity, mainly through using materials to craft wacky weapons such as a tater tot gun or bucket nunchucks. Despite Jared Hess (and maybe one of the five screenwriters) showing a fundamental understanding of the game, it’s a shame the film is predominantly concerned with fan service and abrasively loud energy from its stars that comes across as desperately begging viewers to care. It mostly chooses laziness over imagination, directly insulting everything Minecraft stands for.

Advertisement

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association, Critics Choice Association, and Online Film Critics Society. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews and follow my BlueSky or Letterboxd 

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Locked’ movie review: Anthony Hopkins traps Bill Skarsgård in claustrophobic thriller

Published

on

‘Locked’ movie review: Anthony Hopkins traps Bill Skarsgård in claustrophobic thriller

NOW STREAMING ON:

A down-on-his-luck father finds himself trapped in a state-of-the-art car in Locked, a (mostly) riveting thriller opening in local cinemas this weekend that was introduced by star Bill Skarsgård and Czech producer Petr Jákl at its European premiere in Prague last weekend. This high-concept, white-knuckle thriller benefits greatly from two powerhouse performances and inventive filmmaking from director David Yarovesky (Brightburn), which help keep things interesting through an underwhelming climax.

Locked stars Skarsgård as Eddie Barrish, a pitiful courier stuck between a rock and a hard place: his van is in the shop and he’s short of the repair cost to get it out, meaning he can’t make money or even pick up his young daughter Sarah (Ashley Cartwright) from school. With his last few bucks, he buys some scratch-offs at a convenience store as one last gut-shot hope.

Eddie’s down, but he’s not quite out: from his tatted neck and bright hoodie, we infer he’s something of a hustler even before he touts his street smarts and confirms a criminal record. Walking around dystopian-modern city streets, he tests car door handles for any that might have accidentally been left open, and thinks he’s scored big when he gets inside a luxury SUV.

But Eddie couldn’t be more wrong. Not only is there nothing inside the car, which was built for the film and modeled after the Land Rover Defender—Eddie can’t get out. The doors are locked and the frame impenetrable and soundproof, the windows fully tinted, and a voice coming from the in-vehicle entertainment display informs Eddie that he’s trapped.

Advertisement

That man behind the voice is William (Anthony Hopkins), who tells Eddie that his car has been broken into multiple times, and the police have failed him. So he’s built this SUV as a trap to teach the next thief a lesson—one that gets increasingly dangerous as Eddie runs low on food and water, and William tortures him with electric shocks and extreme climate control settings.

Locked establishes its nifty premise within the first fifteen minutes of screentime, and culminates with a masterfully-executed sequence: as Eddie crawls through the SUV and slowly comes to the realization that he’s trapped, Michael Dallatorre’s camera impossibly swirls around Skarsgård in a single unbroken take through the tight, enclosed space. Director Yarovesky pays homage to David Fincher here, who did this kind of thing in Panic Room, while playing off his lead character’s growing anxiety.

The early scenes in Locked also do a great job of establishing the urban jungle that Eddie lives in, set against a backdrop of graffiti and concrete (the location is not specified, but Locked was shot on the streets of Vancouver). There’s some genuine affection for Eddie’s street culture that recalls 80s classics like They Live; it nicely contrasts later scenes of street life viewed from William’s point of view, vagrants and junkies glimpsed from behind the tinted glass of a luxury SUV.

Locked does such a nice job of building tension early on—and Skarsgård and Hopkins create such compelling characters—that we can look past an uneventful screenplay, adapted by Michael Arlen Ross from the 2011 Argentinean film 4 x 4, written by Mariano Cohn and Gastón Duprat. Still, it would have been nice to learn more about William’s ultimate plan, or see Eddie employ more of those street smarts.

The film really only lets us down during the finale, which operates on the level of a much more traditional thriller than the battle of wits and wills that has preceded it. The screenplay wants us to be rooting for Eddie and against his captor, but it doesn’t take into account the utterly compelling and largely sympathetic performance from Hopkins, which cries out for a more nuanced conclusion.

Advertisement

Still, Locked is a thoroughly captivating ride for most of the ride, fueled by strong performances, stylish direction, and a gripping premise. While the finale may not fully capitalize on the psychological cat-and-mouse game that came before it, this an entirely engaging thriller that delivers enough claustrophobic tension to keep audiences hooked from start to finish.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending