Connect with us

Entertainment

Feedback: Hollywood history and the Academy Museum’s stumble

Published

on

Movie museum’s massive image

The feedback by Mary McNamara on the Academy Museum [“Jewish Erasure Outcry Was Needed,” March 2”] have been on track in regard to leaving out the names of the Jews who began the movement image enterprise in a everlasting assortment on the Academy Museum of Movement Footage.

That’s akin to leaving out the names of outstanding African Individuals resembling Alex Haley, Barbara Jordan, Sojourner Reality or Maya Angelou in a museum of well-known Black Individuals.

Barry Solomon
Redondo Seaside

::

Advertisement

Earlier than and after I visited the Academy Museum of Movement Footage, my fellow Jews exhorted me to be outraged — “there are not any Jews.” In studying Mary McNamara’s article, she supplies a case for historic context of the origins of the trade. However to the outrage, my response was, I noticed the Steven Spielberg video space, the David Geffen theater, the Barbra Streisand bridge. The Jews have been in all places! They paid for many of it. Heck, even the entrance of the constructing had the title of a outstanding Jew, George Soros, carved within the entrance. In order for the Jews being “absent” from the museum, so far as I’m involved, they’re there.

Marcia Greenberg
Los Angeles

::

::

Give attention to the true drawback

Relating to “Falling for the Rip-off” [by Meredith Blake, March 22]: We nonetheless reside in a neoliberal age the place our society’s massive issues are filtered and addressed by people quite than seen as systemic. Working example: the damaging results of contemporary unregulated capitalism. These new TV exhibits in regards to the grifters who stole tens of millions and ruined lives could also be instructional and entertaining, however they might additionally mislead by portraying the issue because the fault of only some “unhealthy apples.”

Advertisement

How about creating exhibits that immediately go after the ecosystem that permits the normal company — the businesses that are each day elements of our lives — to drive earnings inequality, environmental degradation, poor well being outcomes, the erosion of democracy? And the special-interest-controlled governments that permit such injustices to occur? I’d watch that Netflix present.

Zareh Delanchian
Tujunga

::

Drama consists of battle, good in opposition to unhealthy, protagonists and antagonists. With such cinematic creations as “Goodfellas” and “The Godfather,” Martin Scorsese and Francis Ford Coppola have laid declare to being among the many best auteurs in movie historical past. However their material usually focuses on characters that aren’t in alignment with morality or the legislation as most of us perceive it.

To understand the prison thoughts, the con man or the widespread shyster by a screenplay, with actors and with circumstantial re-creations, has been a part of our human inventive heritage since we have been carving pictures on the partitions of caves. Allow us to proceed to shine an inventive gentle on the shadow aspect of the human psyche.

Advertisement

Ben Miles
Huntington Seaside

Not such a sensible transfer

Actually? This was definitely worth the ink spent on Mikael Wooden’s column [“Aaron Lewis Lets It All Out,” March 23]? A full web page dedicated to a man who says “I’m truly actually good …” and goes on to reward Tucker Carlson?

Fox Information received a court docket case by arguing that no affordable viewer takes Carlson severely. Polls have proven that individuals who watch solely Fox Information are much less educated than individuals who watch no information in any respect. Evidently Aaron Lewis makes ignorant and disrespectful feedback each time he opens his mouth and Mikael Wooden and the L.A. Occasions suppose it’s value publishing? Pandering to the fringes?

Gaylon Monteverde
Camarillo

::

Advertisement

What a waste of area printing an interview with a singer who will get his information from Dan Ball and different pretend information sources. Your readers have no real interest in seeing lies and false statements revealed within the L.A. Occasions. By doing so, you contribute to the unfold of misinformation. Identical to publishing photographs of the previous man, we don’t must see this.

Susan Rosenberg
La Quinta

::

I don’t get it. I understand everybody has a proper to a voice, however why within the face of shrinking information area would you waste a complete worthwhile web page of print on the delinquent spewing of a man who flaunts his ignorance of science, fuels his misinformation from Fox Information, admittedly drives away would-be followers, and may’t carry out until he smokes a joint on his technique to the stage? If you happen to’re operating low on folks to profile, I’ve a brand new novel popping out in November, and I’m out there.

Barbara Pronin
Placentia

Advertisement

Do your personal analysis

Why achieve this many readers write to complain that Justin Chang is just too clever in his movie evaluations? Sure, it’s true that in contrast to studying a e-book, watching a film requires much less effort. For essentially the most minimal understanding, you simply have to take a seat there with out falling asleep. This can be why so many viewers suppose their very own opinion is as worthy as an knowledgeable opinion. The newest grievance was that Chang, in his evaluate of the film “After Yang” [“Robot Story on a Human Level,” March 4], made reference to Japanese director Yasujiro Ozu.

The newest letter author pleaded: “How about writing evaluations for individuals who may wish to see films, quite than for different critics?”

I might recommend a fast Google or Wikipedia seek for Yasujiro Ozu, should you don’t know who he’s. Imagine it or not, Ozu and Akira Kurosawa are the contrasting masters of Japanese cinema, each among the many most influential worldwide administrators of all time.

For over 70 years individuals who wish to actually see films have sought out the movies by each, and have been immeasurably enriched. Each movie viewer ought to know them.

Would this letter author have complained a few e-book reviewer who referenced Shakespeare or Tolstoy or Camus or Woolf or Agatha Christie? The promulgation of a extra expansive movie tradition amongst moviegoers is just not a straightforward job.

Advertisement

Charles Derry
Palm Springs

A defining position

Is it attainable that Calendar would roll out a prolonged tackle the nice Mark Rylance [“Tailoring His Role,” March 18] with out mentioning, even alluding to his signature, Emmy-nominated (shoulda-won) transcendence as Thomas Cromwell within the restricted sequence “Wolf Corridor”?

Was “Wolf Corridor” tapped out in code? Hiding someplace in Emily Zemler’s 44 inches of copy to keep away from being outed as a significant work in Rylance’s profession? Nope, simply not there, a surprising omission.

Howard Rosenberg
Los Angeles
Observe: The letter author is a former tv critic for The Occasions.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Top 5 Movies to Watch This Father's Day June 16, 2024 –

Published

on

Movie Review: Top 5 Movies to Watch This Father's Day June 16, 2024 –

A staff report

June 16, 2024 – Happy Father’s Day! What better way to celebrate than by sitting down with your dad and enjoying some quality films together? Whether you’re looking for heartwarming classics or thought-provoking dramas, here are five movies that are sure to make this Father’s Day special:

1. To Kill a Mockingbird (1962)

Gregory Peck delivers an unforgettable performance as Atticus Finch, a principled lawyer in the American South who teaches his children valuable lessons about morality and justice. Based on Harper Lee’s novel, this timeless film is a poignant exploration of fatherhood and standing up for what is right.

Watch it: To Kill a Mockingbird on Prime Video

Advertisement

2. Moneyball (2011)  

For the baseball-loving dads out there, “Moneyball” offers a fresh take on the sport with Brad Pitt portraying Billy Beane, the innovative general manager of the Oakland A’s. This David-vs.-Goliath story, based on a true story and Michael Lewis’ book, showcases how unconventional thinking can lead to unexpected victories.

Watch it: Moneyball on NetflixPrime Video

3. National Lampoon’s Vacation (1983)

Chevy Chase stars as the well-intentioned but hapless Clark Griswold, who embarks on a disastrous cross-country road trip with his family to the elusive Walley World. Full of humor and iconic moments, this comedy is a perfect choice for a lighthearted Father’s Day movie marathon.

Advertisement

Watch it: National Lampoon’s Vacation on Prime Video

4. Minari (2020)

“Minari” tells the heartfelt story of a Korean American family striving for a better life in rural Arkansas. Steven Yeun’s portrayal of the father, Jacob, navigating the challenges of farming and family dynamics, is both tender and powerful. This critically acclaimed film offers a touching exploration of immigrant experiences and familial bonds.

Watch it: Minari on MaxPrime Video

5. Sr. (2022)

Advertisement

In this moving documentary, Robert Downey Jr. pays tribute to his father, Robert Downey Sr., a pioneering filmmaker known for his avant-garde works. Through personal interviews and archival footage, the film celebrates their unique relationship and explores themes of legacy and artistic influence.

Watch it: Sr. on Netflix

This Father’s Day, honor your dad with a cinematic journey through these diverse and enriching stories that celebrate the complexities of fatherhood, family, and the human experience. Whether you prefer classic tales of courage, inspiring underdog stories, or intimate documentaries, these films are sure to create lasting memories and meaningful conversations with your dad.

About Author

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Beyoncé and Jay-Z: Malibu renaissance couple

Published

on

Beyoncé and Jay-Z: Malibu renaissance couple

Jay-Z was born in Brooklyn, N.Y., and Beyoncé in Houston. But Exhibit A of their global entertainment dominance sits squarely in Southern California on the Malibu coast, a gleaming 40,000-square-foot concrete-and-glass mansion that the couple bought last year for $200 million, a record sum for a single-family home in California. Their combined net worth, according to Forbes, is estimated at more than $3 billion.

Discover the changemakers who are shaping every cultural corner of Los Angeles. This week we bring you The Money, a collection of bankers, political bundlers, philanthropists and others whose deep pockets give them their juice. Come back each Sunday for another installment.

The power that hip-hop’s premier couple wields goes well beyond the symbolic. They have teamed up on some of the most storied collaborations of the last decade, traversing stadiums across North America, along with two shows in Paris, for the sometimes bumpy On the Run tour in 2014. Four years later, they ran it back with the more harmonious On the Run II, which grossed more than $250 million. In between, in 2016, they rented out the Louvre and outshone the “Mona Lisa” in the six-minute music video for “Apeshit,” in which Beyoncé shunned her signature vocal runs to instead rap bar-for-bar alongside her husband. (The family collaborations have extended to the couple’s children, with eldest child Blue Ivy Carter joining her mother on the 2023 Renaissance world tour.)

Advertisement

They have teamed up on some of the most storied collaborations of the last decade.

The last few years, though, have belonged to Beyoncé, who outpaced Jay-Z — and most of the recording industry — while touring behind the 2022 blockbuster “Renaissance” album and then releasing “Cowboy Carter,” another record-breaking album that saw the artist plant her flag firmly in country music terrain. The Renaissance tour, which was her highest-grossing (and the eighth highest of all time) included four late-summer stops at SoFi Stadium and a concert movie, which former Times reporter Marissa Evans called “a grandiose dare to anyone who tried to ask us to be less of ourselves.” Meanwhile, the “Renaissance” album continued to shake dance floors across the globe, while also earning Beyoncé, 42, a 32nd Grammy, making her the most decorated artist in the history of the awards show.

Beyoncé in a silver body suit, hat and boots singing on a stage surrounded by backup dancers in similar attire

Beyoncé performs on stage during the Renaissance tour at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood on Sept. 4.

(Kevin Mazur / WireImage / Parkwood)

Even in an “off year,” Jay-Z, 54, still went where few others have gone. Last summer, the Brooklyn Public Library honored him with “The Book of HOV,” a multimedia exhibit showcasing unseen photos, archived artifacts and some of his original masters. Visitors didn’t even have to step inside the library to marvel at his greatness; some of his most timeless lyrics were stamped along the building’s towering exterior. It’s another reason why galaxy-brained entrepreneurs would line up to pay $500,000 for the chance to pick his mind over dinner — even if the man himself says it’d be a fool’s decision.

Advertisement

More from L.A. Influential

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Joel Edgerton: ‘Bright' Didn’t Deserve “Harsh” Reviews — World of Reel

Published

on

Joel Edgerton: ‘Bright' Didn’t Deserve “Harsh” Reviews — World of Reel

I’m all for audiences embracing critically reviled films, that’s why I still regularly check out user scores on IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes, just to not be totally lost in my critical bubble, which is such an easy place to get sucked into.

Knowing the world of film criticism all too well, I realize that cliques happen, waves of peer-pressured bandwagon fervor wreak havoc. If it happens that you don’t agree with the flock, then you run the risk of being chastised and mocked. I couldn’t care less, but there are some who do. The hive mind mentality is most definitely part of today’s film criticism.

In 2017, critics seemed to be in universal agreement that David Ayer’s “Bright,” starring Will Smith and Joel Edgerton, was a terrible action movie. The film, which garnered a 26% on RT and 29 on Metacritic, was widely mocked by the critical community, with many proclaiming it to be the worst film of the year.

The critical response was so bad that Ayer ended up scolding a few of the detracting critics, including IndieWire’s David Ehrlich, going as far as daring Ehrlich to try to write his own script. One might understand Ayer’s ire, a lot was riding on his film which, at the time, was the most expensive Netflix ever produced at a reported budget of $90M.

In a rather surprising twist of fate, audience reactions for the film were the polar opposite of the critical community. “Bright” ended up receiving an RT audience score of 90% —which has since lowered to 84— and on Google the film was at 90%. On Netflix, based on 1,469 user submission, the reviews were also overwhelmingly positive, with most being 4 or 5 stars.

Advertisement

Speaking to Inverse, Edgerton is now opening up about Bright’s nasty reviews. The actor praises the film’s blend of high fantasy with the police procedural genre, but acknowledges the impact of the negative reviews, stating they may have derailed plans for a sequel.

I have a lot of feelings about “Bright”. I’m fascinated by the disparity between critical and audience responses to movies. Often, the audience score is low, but critics love it, or vice versa. Occasionally, you get a double win or a double loss. My brother’s TV series, “Mr Inbetween”, is one of the rare double wins. But “Bright” was in the low 30s with critics, yet it resonated with viewers. Netflix’s algorithms would confirm that, as many people rated it highly, showing a clear appetite for more. I think critics were a bit too harsh on it.

About that sequel to “Bright,” it didn’t happen for a number of reasons, but the movie’s critical reputation wasn’t one of them. It was delayed a few times, due to co-star Will Smith’s busy schedule and due to Netflix’s inability to find a director (Ayer didn’t want to return). Eventually, Netflix canceled the whole thing after Smith’s “Oscar slap” scandal.

Ayer has never been embraced by critics, “Bright” is just one of many films he’s directed that got panned — the others include the likes of “The Tax Collector,” “Suicide Squad,” “Sabotage,” and “Street Kings.”

Continue Reading

Trending