Connect with us

Entertainment

Dolly Parton is a total rock star (even if she doesn’t think so)

Published

on

Dolly Parton is a total rock star (even if she doesn’t think so)

When the Rock & Roll Corridor of Fame introduced seventeen new nominees for induction final month, many had been shocked to see Dolly Parton on the record, proper there alongside rapper Eminem and soul crooner Lionel Richie. The commonest responses appeared divided between “Wait, isn’t she a nation artist” and “Wait, isn’t she already in?” In any other case, folks had been in settlement: Dolly Parton was a lock to be voted into the Corridor when inductees are introduced in Could — and she or he would deserve it.

That consensus got here to us, in fact, due to her smart and beneficiant songs, and her dulcet voice. It was additionally due to her big-hearted embrace of artifice (“It value some huge cash to look this low cost,” she likes to say) and to a finely cultivated persona that’s directly down-to-earth and bigger-than-life. And it’s even due to her model of kinder, gentler entrepreneurship (If we are able to’t make faculty free for all, can we at the least all get jobs at Dollywood?). It’s a cliché, however as near true as a cliché can ever be: In our polarized instances, the one factor everybody agrees on is that Dolly Parton rocks.

Properly, not everybody. Seems one determine who disagreed about placing her into the Rock Corridor was Parton herself. In a press release shared yesterday on social media, Parton introduced that whereas she was “extraordinarily flattered and grateful to be nominated,” she didn’t assume she had “earned that proper.” She didn’t “need votes to be break up due to” her, and she or he was going to “respectfully bow out.”

Parton’s announcement was surprising, to place it mildly, and raised extra questions than it answered: Would the Corridor honor her needs and retract her nomination? As ballots have already been accomplished and returned by some voters, what if Parton wins induction anyway? Would she boycott the ceremony? In fact, the largest query was: Why?

The reasoning Parton shared for declining her nomination was self-effacing and assertive — and characteristically inscrutable. She exhibited humility at the same time as she emphasised her ambition to be inducted sometime “if I’m worthy.” Then, within the final a part of her demurral, amounting to barely greater than half of her temporary assertion, she teased a possible new undertaking. This Corridor of Fame episode had “impressed [her] to place out a terrific rock ‘n’ roll album in some unspecified time in the future sooner or later, which [she had] all the time needed to do,” the 76-year-old defined.

Advertisement

No disrespect meant to maybe the best singer-songwriter America has ever produced, however none of that makes a lot sense.

Dolly Parton performs in 1979.

(Tsugufumi Matsumoto / Related Press)

Parton appears to be suggesting that she hasn’t earned induction as a result of she hasn’t but recorded any rock ‘n’ roll music (that big-tent mix of nation, R&B, blues, gospel, soul and extra), not to mention any rock music (rock ‘n’ roll’s post-Beatles, post-Dylan subgenre, intently recognized with the drug tradition, the sexual revolution, longer and louder electrical guitar solos, plus different signifiers of the 60s). However that stance reveals a far-too-rigid understanding of musical style. What’s extra, it diminishes the interdependent significance, breadth and complexity of each rock and nation music — and of Dolly Parton.

Advertisement

Parton grew up within the rural Blue Ridge Mountains, however she turned 10 the 12 months Elvis Presley went nationwide. No shock then that her first single, lower in 1959, was a spry rockabilly referred to as “Pet Love.” Over the following a number of years, her recordings break up the distinction between Elvis-y ballads and Brill Constructing-styled “woman group” tunes. By the point Parton was constantly scoring nation hits within the early Seventies, such old-time rock ‘n’ roll had grown largely passé on the rock music scene, however its fashion and sound, and even a few of its stars, had migrated to Nashville. Consider Rock Corridor of Famer Jerry Lee Lewis’ second profession as a rustic hitmaker.

Or consider Dolly. One among Parton’s early solo hits, for instance, was a model of “Muleskinner Blues,” a tune by the so-called Father of Nation Music, Jimmie Rodgers, himself inducted as an “Early Affect” within the Rock Corridor’s inaugural class. Parton offers the hoary tune new life by flipping the gender of Rodgers’ lyric — she’s a “woman muleskinner” — and by goosing it with a hurtling rock-and-soul rhythm monitor.

In 1974, Parton launched what, at this level, might be her most well-known quantity, “I Will All the time Love You,” sung in a method that doesn’t borrow a lot from nation singers reminiscent of Hank Williams, one other Early Affect inductee, or Johnny Money, each a Nation Music Corridor of Fame and Rock Corridor member, because it evokes the tenderly dramatic types of Nineteen Fifties rock ‘n’ roll (née rhythm and blues) vocal teams reminiscent of Rock & Roll Corridor of Fame members the Platters. In case that connection was missed, Parton launched “The Nice Pretender,” a synth-drenched album of rock ‘n’ roll covers, in 1984.

Parton’s influences by way of her profession have confirmed almost as ecumenical because the Rock Corridor of Fame’s assorted roster. “Dolly needed to be extra like Aretha Franklin …,” her one-time boss and mentor Porter Wagoner as soon as remembered of his former “woman singer’s” pop ambitions and of the inventive tensions that contributed to their break up. “She had all [Franklin’s] information, she needed extra punch.” Take heed to that coolly rock regular groove on “Jolene,” and you already know she discovered it. Take heed to variations of Parton’s songs as carried out by Whitney Houston, Linda Ronstadt, the White Stripes, Lil Nas X, Shania Twain and Kacey Musgraves and on and on, and you already know Parton has helped others trend their very own genre-bending grooves.

Parton could merely be feeling a way of loyalty to the neighborhood that raised her up — she simply co-hosted the Academy of Nation Music awards. In fact, she has the correct to establish her music nevertheless she needs. And she will change her thoughts about how she frames her musical story as usually as she sees match — self-invention and even reinvention are integral rock ‘n’ roll values. Keep in mind that on the peak of her profession, when she was crossing over from nation radio to pop with hits reminiscent of “Right here You Come Once more,” “9 to five” and “Islands within the Stream,” Parton argued for a extra inclusive big-tent method to style than she appears to be defending now. “I’m not leaving nation music,” she argued then. “I’m taking it with me.”

Advertisement

Right here’s hoping Parton will change her thoughts once more and take nation music together with her to the Rock & Roll Corridor of Fame. For Parton, it could be yet one more recognition of the perpetual interaction amongst genres and audiences that has made her music so beloved by so many for thus lengthy — and of the way in which her standing as a feminist icon and embrace of the LGBTQ neighborhood have aligned her with rock’s sense of freedom. For all of us, it could be yet one more crucial antidote to the poisonous, hidebound discuss of style purity that we’re nonetheless struggling to maneuver past when fascinated by fashionable music. Parton was “genre-fluid,” because it’s now referred to as, earlier than it had a reputation. However she’s been an arms-wide-open rock star all alongside.

David Cantwell is the writer of “The Operating Form: Listening to Merle Haggard,” to be printed in Could by College of Texas Press.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: “Mufasa,” everything we didn’t need to know about “The Lion King”

Published

on

Movie Review: “Mufasa,” everything we didn’t need to know about “The Lion King”

The CGI animated savannahs, rivers and rock formations of Africa are photo-real, and the animals populating it have never been more realistically rendered than they are in “Mufasa: The Lion King.”

Disney felt the need to have the lions, warthog and meercat’s lips move when they sing, which is saying something.

But let’s keep this review short and not-exactly-sweet, unlike this boardroom-ordered prequel to one of Disney’s most popular intellectual properties. “Mufasa: The Lion King” never makes the case that it’s a story that needed to be told or a movie that needed to be made.

It’s about how Mufasa got separated from his birth-parents’ pride of lions, and joined another, becoming “brothers” with the lion cub who “saved” him, but who will come to be called “Scar.”

So the object of this prequel is to show how Mufasa became Lion King and how Scar got his scar and became the bitter rival in their pride.

The “story” is framed as a “story” Rafiki the ape (John Sani) tells Simba’s cub, and that cub’s protectors/babysitters, Timon (Billy Eichner) and Pumbaa (Seth Rogen).

Advertisement

The tale is of another coming-of-age quest, with two young-lions on their own this time, paired-up, depending on each other, on the run from a pride of albino lions led by the killer Kiros (Mads Mikkelsen).

There are new songs of a far more forgettable nature than those from the animated classic “The Lion King.”

“The circle is broken,” he growls, and we believe him.

There are harrowing moments of drama in their quest, but there’s precious little humor to the movie, all of it provided by the same duo who have always been the comic relief, Timon and Pumbaa.

“We’ve been singing ‘Hakuna Matata’ since forever!”

Advertisement

“Who hasn’t?

The messaging, about taking in “strays,” and that “To be lost is to learn the way,” is weak tea.

Story failings aside, it’s not a bad movie. But “Mufasa” never lets us forget the limited-entertainment-value of the entire undertaking. Oscar winner Barry Jenkins (“Moonlight”) was hired to direct, but aside from a few voice casting decisions (Keith David, Anika Noni Rose, with Aaron Pierre and Kelvin Harrison, Jr. as Mufasa and Taka/Scar), he brings nothing to this that makes a difference.

Disney’s tech/animators telling their bosses that “Yes, we can make it look like a movie with real singing lions and bathing hippos on the veldt without using real animals or shooting on location” is no justification for showcasing that technology.

Story matters, and this one didn’t need to be told.

Advertisement

Rating: PG, some violence

Cast: The voices of Aaron Pierre, Kelvin Harrison, Jr., Tiffany Boone, John Kani, Mads Mikkelsen, Thandiwe Newton, Keith David, Billy Eichner and Seth Rogen.

Credits: Directed by Barry Jenkins, scripted by Jeff Nathanson, based on characters from Disney’s “The Lion King.” A Walt Disney release.

Running time: 1:58

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Justin Baldoni's ex-publicist sues over alleged Blake Lively smear campaign

Published

on

Justin Baldoni's ex-publicist sues over alleged Blake Lively smear campaign

As Blake Lively’s allegations against her “It Ends With Us” director and co-star Justin Baldoni continue to reverberate through Hollywood, a new lawsuit has further raised the stakes.

Stephanie Jones, Baldoni’s former publicist, filed a complaint Tuesday in New York Supreme Court, accusing the actor’s crisis PR team of waging a coordinated effort to undermine her and deflect blame for what she calls a retaliatory smear campaign targeting Lively.

The new lawsuit adds to the mounting fallout from Lively’s legal complaint filed last week in California. In it, the actor accused Baldoni of sexually harassing her on the set of the romantic drama and orchestrating a campaign to discredit her after she raised concerns about a “hostile work environment.” Her complaint detailed allegations of “improvised physical intimacy” during scenes, pressure from Baldoni to perform greater nudity than originally agreed upon and a calculated effort to spread damaging stories about her in the press.

Jones alleges that Jennifer Abel, formerly a senior figure at her PR firm Jonesworks, collaborated with crisis manager Melissa Nathan on a “no-holds-barred strategy” to shield Baldoni from Lively’s misconduct allegations while simultaneously undermining Jones’ own reputation. According to her lawsuit, the plan involved planting negative stories about Lively in the media, creating fake social media accounts to amplify the attacks and leveraging Baldoni’s public image as a feminist ally to discredit her.

“Behind Jones’s back, [Abel and Nathan] secretly coordinated with Baldoni and [his studio] Wayfarer to implement an aggressive media smear campaign against Baldoni’s film co-star,” the lawsuit states.

Advertisement

Jones, who represented Baldoni and Wayfarer from 2017 until her termination in August 2024, claims the alleged scheme destroyed her professional relationship with the actor-director. Abel is accused of using confidential company information to poach clients and lay the groundwork for a competing PR firm.

“Defendants Abel and Nathan secretly conspired for months to publicly and privately attack Jones and [her PR firm] Jonesworks,” the lawsuit alleges, describing efforts to “steal clients and business prospects” while pinning the blame for the smear campaign on Jones herself.

The filing includes excerpts from thousands of pages of text messages and emails that Jones says were extracted from Abel’s company-issued phone after her firing from Jonesworks in August, shortly before the company’s relationship with Baldoni and Wayfarer came to an end. In one exchange, Abel allegedly described Baldoni as “pompous” and mocked his decision to attend a men’s retreat during the film’s release, writing, “He doesn’t need a retreat. He needs to be humbled.”

Jones accuses Abel and Nathan of weaponizing the controversy to “drive a wedge” between her and Baldoni, isolating her in the industry and damaging her career. Her lawsuit seeks damages and a court order to halt what she describes as ongoing harassment and professional sabotage. “This lawsuit seeks to finally put a stop to their continued misconduct and to compensate Jones and Jonesworks for the damage Defendants’ conduct and scheme has inflicted,” the filing reads.

Bryan Freedman, an attorney representing Baldoni and the other defendants, could not immediately be reached for comment but has previously dismissed Lively’s claims against his clients as “false, outrageous, and intentionally salacious.”

Advertisement

As lawsuits from both Lively and Jones unfold in the courts and the public eye, the controversy has cast a harsh spotlight on Hollywood’s PR playbook, exposing the darker corners of reputation management in an industry facing calls for greater transparency and accountability.

The allegations have already had professional repercussions for Baldoni. Earlier this week, his talent agency, WME, dropped him as a client and the nonprofit Vital Voices Global Partnership rescinded an award honoring him as an advocate for women’s empowerment. In a statement, the organization said Baldoni’s alleged “abhorrent conduct” detailed in Lively’s lawsuit was “contrary to the values of Vital Voices and the spirit of the Award.”

Author Colleen Hoover, whose bestselling novel “It Ends With Us” was based on, has also expressed support for Lively, writing on Instagram: “Blake’s ability to refuse to sit down and ‘be buried’ has been nothing short of inspiring.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Better Man (2024) – Movie Review

Published

on

Better Man (2024) – Movie Review

Better Man, 2024.

Directed by Michael Gracey.
Starring Robbie Williams, Jonno Davies, Steve Pemberton, Damon Herriman, Raechelle Banno, Alison Steadman, Kate Mulvany, Frazer Hadfield, Tom Budge, Anthony Hayes, Jake Simmance, Jesse Hyde, Liam Head, Chase Vollenweider, Rose Flanagan, Jack Sherran, Karina Banno, Asmara Feik, Leo Harvey-Elledge, Elyssia Koulouris, Frazer Hadfield, Chris Gun, Ben Hall, Kaela Daffara, and Chase Vollenweider.

SYNOPSIS:

Follow Robbie Williams’ journey from childhood, to being the youngest member of chart-topping boyband Take That, through to his unparalleled achievements as a record-breaking solo artist – all the while confronting the challenges that stratospheric fame and success can bring.

Advertisement

During a conversation exploring the possibility of a biopic, British popstar Robbie Williams told well-regarded musical director Michael Gracey that he saw himself as a monkey performing for others. That became the window into telling the story of this singer/songwriter with Better Man, a film that, as the title implies, also shows that Robbie Williams is self-aware of his flaws, mistakes, and shortcomings without being afraid to put them front and center. Yes, rather than go through the arduous casting process, Michael Gracey ran with that comment literally, making the creative choice to have the pop star played by a CGI monkey (voiced by Jonno Davies, with Robbie Williams lending his vocals.)

It’s a smart move to roll a short clip of subject and filmmaker conversing before the film starts proper, not just because other parts of the world might not be familiar with Robbie Williamss music (consistently accidentally reading it as a biopic about musician Robin Williams if you’re anything like me), but also since this is such a bold concept for a biopic that it’s helpful to get an idea of what this man looks like and the personality he puts out there before it’s all monkey business.

Going one step further, this turns out to not fall into the trappings of a flailing gimmick but ties into themes of pressures of the music industry, fame causing stunted behavior, family drama, and an unflinching portrayal of self that doesn’t smooth over any rough edges. Better Man is an invigorating biopic; a shot of adrenaline to the most overplayed, clichéd genre. After this, no one should be allowed to make biopics (at least ones about musicians) unless they have an equally creative angle or some compelling X factor behind it. Simply put, this film puts most recent offerings from the genre to shame, especially the ones that get trotted out at the end of every year as familiar awards bait.

Even though the life trajectory and story beats aren’t anything new to anyone who has ever seen a biopic about a musician before, it gets to be told with boundless imagination, typically coming from several dazzling musical sequences. Not only are they dynamic in presentation (whether it be jubilantly unfolding across the streets of London or something more melancholy regarding fatherly abandonment), but they are sometimes highwire concepts themselves; Better Man has one of the most thrilling, fantastically clever, visually stunning, and exciting takes on battling one’s demons.

The characters (including Robbie’s family, friends, lover, hell, and even Oasis) don’t interact or react to Robbie Williams as a monkey. It’s a visual treat for us (this film would fall apart without the astonishingly expressive technical wizardry from Weta, who already have proven themselves as outstanding in this field when it comes to the recent Planet of the Apes movies) but another personal, self-deprecating, honest interpretation of how Robbie saw himself during these life stages. Initially, this feels like it will end up as a missed opportunity for further creativity or humor. One of the more surprising elements here is that the filmmakers (with Michael Gracey co-writing alongside Oliver Cole and Simon Gleeson) are playing this material straight and not going for laughs. That confidence pays off, allowing a maximalist, melodramatic side to come out with sincere, absorbing emotional heft.

Advertisement

That story follows a standard rise and fall structure, with Robbie Williams finding inspiration from his initially supportive singing father (Steve Pemberton), exhibiting a relatable drive to make his grandmother (Alison Steadman proud, getting his start in boy band Take That before his insecurities and worsening substance abuse and egocentric behavior gets him kicked out, stumbling into a rocky relationship with Nicole Appleton (Raechelle Banno), and then not only finding the courage to put some meaningful lyrics out into the world through a successful solo career but managing the anxieties that come with performing in front of humongous crowds while constantly struggling with drug addiction. 

Some of those aspects feel glossed over and aren’t as explored as they possibly could have been (the film is already 135 minutes, but some of it is given a broad strokes treatment), but it’s affecting anyway due to the creativity, artistry, musical numbers, and blunt honesty enhancing those character dynamics. Better Man is a biopic that starts with a confessional about being a narcissist and having a punchable face and ends up somewhere beautifully moving that perfectly captures the essence of that title. There is also a healthy dose of Frank Sinatra here, given that he was a major source of inspiration for Robbie Williams, so let’s say he and Michael Gracey did this biopic their way, and the result is something no one should want any other way.

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association and the Critics Choice Association. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews, follow my Twitter or Letterboxd, or email me at MetalGearSolid719@gmail.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading

Trending