Connect with us

Entertainment

Commentary: Hollywood relies on LGBTQ audiences. In return, it’s failing us miserably

Published

on

Commentary: Hollywood relies on LGBTQ audiences. In return, it’s failing us miserably

Rainbow logos and statements of assist from leisure corporations have turn into a routine a part of Satisfaction celebrations every June. However their recurring reluctance to talk out towards these harming the LGBTQ+ neighborhood when it issues most has proven again and again that we are able to’t rely on them as allies.

Final week, Walt Disney Co. Chief Government Bob Chapek fumbled the corporate’s response to Florida’s HB 1557 — higher often known as the “Don’t Say Homosexual” invoice — by refusing to take a public stance on the laws regardless of Disney’s giant footprint within the state. However there isn’t a such factor as neutrality with regards to the rights of marginalized communities, and Chapek was pushed to reevaluate his strategy greater than as soon as.

Launched in Florida’s statehouse earlier this yr, Home Invoice 1557 would prohibit lecturers from discussing sexual orientation or gender id by way of the third grade and would restrict conversations about these subjects in larger grades to these deemed “age applicable or developmentally applicable.” And though the legislation lacks any steerage on what can be thought of “applicable,” it will permit dad and mom to sue the district for violations. Critics of the invoice have identified that it might maintain educators from acknowledging the existence of queer, trans and non-binary folks in any respect.

The pushback from Disney’s LGBTQ+ workers and allies — in addition to queer followers and advocates — was swift and intense. However the frustration runs deeper than one invoice threatening the humanity and security of LGBTQ+ folks, notably kids. Chapek’s preliminary makes an attempt to defend Disney’s contributions to politicians supporting the invoice, or to counsel that company statements “do little or no” to create change on necessary points, inadvertently uncovered the corporate’s allyship as mere lip service, if not outright hypocrisy.

Disney is simply the newest leisure firm to find that the need to domesticate queer audiences, who’re recognized for his or her loyal engagement with the tradition they eat, additionally creates a way of mutual obligation: Within the present local weather, taking our cash in return for what Chapek known as “inspiring content material” is not satisfactory.

Advertisement

Dave Chappelle has been known as out for his transphobic materials in “The Nearer.”

(Mathieu Bitton / Netflix)

The Disney maelstrom arrives within the wake of comparable scrutiny Netflix confronted final yr for its dealing with of Dave Chappelle’s newest comedy particular, “The Nearer.” LGBTQ+ Netflix workers and viewers known as out the comic’s transphobic materials, and the corporate’s failure to correctly tackle considerations by its trans workers and allies culminated in a extremely publicized workers walkout. (Disney workers are following go well with.)

Chappelle’s transphobic bit grew out of the controversy surrounding “Harry Potter” writer J.Okay. Rowling. Lately, the acclaimed writer has routinely made hurtful and dangerous antitrans remarks — as if affirming trans ladies poses a menace to cis ladies. Wizarding World actors from Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson to Eddie Redmayne have condemned these statements, nevertheless it has not stopped Warner Bros. from persevering with to develop tasks with Rowling connected, together with the upcoming “Implausible Beasts: The Secrets and techniques of Dumbledore.”

Advertisement

No company might be known as an ally that compartmentalizes harmful anti-LGBTQ laws as mere partisan disagreement or tacitly endorses the damaging discourse of distinguished figures by offering them a platform, continued employment or each.

As Disney’s LGBTQ+ workers identified as they shared their ache, fears and anger in public and firm channels, the corporate has an extremely quick historical past of “inspiring” queer illustration to cover behind anyway. The studio has been known as out on its lack of significant LGBTQ+ on-screen illustration for years. And in keeping with Pixar workers, the corporate censors “almost each second of overtly homosexual affection” within the animation studio’s tasks.

For all that Netflix has been hailed for internet hosting nuanced portrayals of the LGBTQ+ neighborhood in sequence similar to “Orange Is the New Black” and documentaries similar to “Disclosure,” its missteps prolong past standing by Chapelle. The streamer’s docuseries “Tiger King,” for instance, misgenders and deadnames a trans zoo supervisor featured on the present. Its worldwide hit “Cash Heist,” has been known as out for casting a cis actor to play a trans character.

And regardless of Rowling’s personal extra-textual assertion that “Harry Potter” character Albus Dumbledore is homosexual, his sexual orientation has been barely hinted at on display in his subsequent look within the “Implausible Beasts” sequence of movies.

Chapek has since apologized to workers and introduced Disney would pause political contributions in Florida. Netflix Chief Government Ted Sarandos shortly acknowledged that he “screwed up” his preliminary response to the backlash — together with telling his workers in a memo that “content material on display doesn’t immediately translate to real-world hurt” — however continued to defend “The Nearer.”

Advertisement

And whereas Warner Bros. has beforehand issued an announcement affirming its dedication to range and inclusion in response to Rowling’s hateful feedback, the corporate has not publicly addressed its working relationship with the writer. Rowling’s look within the current HBO “Harry Potter” reunion was restricted to archive footage, however she stays a screenwriter on the “Implausible Beats” movies.

 J.K. Rowling in Nov. 8, 2018.

J.Okay. Rowling has made quite a few antitrans assertions lately.

(Christophe Ena / Related Press)

None of those controversies have but been addressed sufficiently. However it’s price noting that the criticism of Disney’s poor dealing with of the uproar over HB 1557 extends past a single lightning-rod creator. As a family-friendly leisure firm that has constructed its model round endearing itself to folks from childhood by way of fantasy and surprise, Disney is in a singular place.

In any case, tales assist us determine the world, who we’re and even who we need to be. For many individuals who grew up on Disney movies, each the tales and the recollections round watching these tales performed not less than some half in shaping who we ultimately turned. (And that’s to not point out the Disney theme parks that develop on these fantasies and switch them into real-world experiences.)

Advertisement

Regardless of its historic lack of recognizably LGBTQ+ characters — except for queer-coded villains — queer and trans youngsters have been in a position to see themselves in characters similar to a mermaid who longs to be part of a world the place they really feel like they belong; a cursed beast who most individuals worry as an alternative of attempting to know; and a daughter who wonders why her look doesn’t mirror who she actually is inside. That is even earlier than studying that there have been LGBTQ+ creatives that helped convey these tales to life.

Years of conversations across the significance of illustration — in addition to an understanding that LGBTQ+ individuals are additionally customers — led to Disney’s more moderen development of blink-and-you’ll-miss-it situations of “first” LGBTQ+ moments in Star Wars, Pixar, Walt Disney Footage and Marvel movies. Although this restricted inclusion arrived lengthy after LGBTQ+ characters and storylines turned extra widespread at different movie studios and tv, they have been usually preceded by teases, as if there was an expectation that these nuggets of illustration can be lauded — and quell critics.

However illustration alone, irrespective of how vital, is simply not sufficient at a time the place quite a few states are advancing a report variety of anti-LGBTQ laws. Republican politicians in states together with Georgia, Tennessee, Indiana and Kansas have launched payments this yr that might restrict classroom discussions about sexual orientation and gender id. Eleven states, together with Iowa and South Dakota, have handed legal guidelines that prohibit trans scholar athletes from competing in class sports activities in keeping with their gender. And following Texas’ lead, Idaho is contemplating a legislation that can punish dad and mom for permitting their trans kids to obtain life-saving gender-affirming care.

Leisure corporations have stated again and again how a lot they worth range and purpose to advocate for a extra inclusive future. Perhaps someday they’ll show it.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Mother’s Instinct movie review: Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway shine in Hitchcockian thriller

Published

on

Mother’s Instinct movie review: Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway shine in Hitchcockian thriller

Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway are two of the best actors of this generation, capable of elevating every film they star in. They were previously cast together in Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar, although the incredulous design of the film meant they were barely in a scene together. Benoît Delhomme’s Mother’s Instinct-a remake of Olivier Masset-Depasse’s 2018 Belgian thriller, thankfully does not do the same. (Also read: Best acting performances of 2024: From Fahadh Faasil in Aavesham to Kani Kusruti in All We Imagine As Light)

Jessica Chastain and Anne Hathaway in a still from Mother’s Instinct.

The premise

The two actors play next-door neighbours whose lives become interlinked with guilt, tragedy, and manipulations. The premise has it all: campiness, costumes, and a spiral of melodrama. But alas, the result is a movie too sunlit, too heavy-handed, and a bit too serious for its own good.

Celine (Anne Hathaway) and Alice (Jessica Chastain) are suburban housewives who become the best of friends, understanding each other’s dreams and moods like long-lost sisters. Alice is holding together well considering how delicate her condition was at one point, and Celine provides her able support- two women who share the joys and worries of motherhood. Their pitch-perfect lives come crashing down with the shocking death of Celine’s son Max (Baylen D Bielitz), who slips and falls from his home’s balcony above. Alice blames herself, and Celine can no longer stand to face her.

Advertisement

This devastating loss tears apart the domestic idyll of Celine and Alice’s lives. Celine’s husband Damian (Josh Charles) takes to the bottle, and their relationship gets a little worse every passing day. Her depression threatens to ruin the façade that the neighbours try to pull in the months after, even as Alice cannot seem to understand how to save a friend.

What works

Alice has her own anxieties along the way, which become more real as she realizes that Celine might be plotting something way more sinister behind those empty stares. Her husband Simon (Anders Danielsen Lie) does not believe her. Is she daydreaming? Can this be real?

Mother’s Instinct has so much potential to be one of those campy, highly entertaining yet morbid psychodrama of the year that make for a perfect repeat watch. However, the telling lacks nuance and a keen eye for character. The tone, often punctuated with brightly lit frames of pastel-coloured outfits, rings decidedly off to pull this melodrama to its pulpiest potential.

Final thoughts

Jessica Chastain is wonderful in the rather thankless part and makes Alice’s fragility her greatest weapon. She is matched beautifully by Hathaway’s razor-sharp assessment of Celine—a woman slowly losing a sense of herself. One wishes they had the chance to go more theatrical with these roles; these women had all the elements to go for a Joan Crawford-Bette Davis-like dirt-slinging. However, it lacks the killer instinct of a Hitchcockian thriller.

Nevertheless, Mother’s Instinct manages to be a willingly safe melodrama that settles its dust without much trouble.

Advertisement

Mother’s Instinct is now available to watch on Lionsgate Play.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

George Perez turned a painful life as an ex-con into laughs as a comedy veteran

Published

on

George Perez turned a painful life as an ex-con into laughs as a comedy veteran

On a recent Saturday night on Sunset Boulevard, a pair of black 1940s low-riders guided the diverse, sold-out crowd into the Comedy Store. Cypress Hill hung out in the green room. Los Angeles photographer and director Estevan Oriol oversaw six cameras and the taping of George Perez’s debut hour special, “Misunderstood,” presented by Foos Gone Wild.

“There were no fights,” Perez enthuses. “And,” with the mark of a successful Perez show traditionally measured in beer sales, “they sold out of 805s, Coors Lights and Peronis!”

Originally from Orange County (“the Republican L.A.,” he calls it), Perez’s material combines deeply personal narrative with sociopolitical insight. Before releasing “Misunderstood” in 2025, he headlines New Year’s Eve at the two-year-old Stand Up Comedy Club. He’s already working on new material for the occasion.

“That club has my culture all around it,” he says of the Bellflower venue. “Mexicans walk there; they don’t even drive. It’s by houses, apartments, by downtown, and every time I go there, it sells out. And I don’t even do Friday and Saturday. I do Tuesdays and Wednesdays, and I love that club. I love the crowd. It’s dark and comics like to hang out.”

In Orange, Perez adored Cheech and Chong and was joking for his family by age 13. Later, he kept his construction co-workers cracking up. A girlfriend dragged him to an underground Wednesday comedy show at a Fullerton club called Rio. He recalls the warm-up comedians on the show being pretty corny. Toward the end when a headliner put his roasting skills against anyone in the crowd, Perez took the challenge.

Advertisement

“Prison was the best thing for me; it humbled me,” he says. “There’s no more fighting. There is only using your words,” Perez said.

(Estevan Oriol)

“I went up there, I beat him, and I got the itch that day,” he recalls. “Then the next day, I quit construction.”

The show was hosted by Edwin San Juan (“SlantEd Comedy”), who mistook Perez for a ringer. The two remain close to this day. Perez recently bought a swap meet bootleg DVD of the 2001 evening labeled, “George Perez’s first time doing comedy.” Within eight months, he made his television debut on “LATV Live,” the primetime flagship series of L.A.’s first bilingual station.

Advertisement

Early grinding involved “the craziest s—,” including shows for 30 people at tweaker houses where his cousin sold meth and a spot called the Wild Coyote, “the Mexican Apollo” where Felipe Esparza, Gabriel Iglesias and Ralphie May hung out. He started setting up chairs and doing bringer shows at Casa Latina in Rosemead. A year later, he was hosting to 300 people every Tuesday as well as doing spots at the Hollywood Improv. Whatever the venue, Perez knew tickets had sold well when venue managers laughed, “The Coronas are done! You did your job!”

Audiences and industry reacted with surprise. “You thought [I] was going to talk about drive-bys, tortillas and lowriders and [I’m] up there talking about Shakespeare,” Perez says. He subverted stereotypes about growing up in the streets, got deep about being a young dad and discussed politics as a lifelong local.

Perez appeared on MTV, Showtime and Comedy Central before a previous version of his life caught up to him. Before comedy, he had been a gang member since seventh grade. There was vandalism, carjacking, gun charges and a steadfast refusal to walk from fights. Perez was a felon at 18, the same year his son was born.

Nearly two years later, he recalls, “The guy that I beat up sees me on MTV’s ‘Yo Mama,’ and he’s like, ‘That’s the guy that beat me up!’ ” Then the gang unit raided the strip club he was DJing at. “I fight it, I lose, and I’m in prison. There’s no more freedom of speech. So the comedian is completely gone. I’m now in survival mode.” He did three years.

Guards remembered seeing him perform at the Ontario Improv. Everyone knew he was on TV. He did perform inside sometimes, including for the warden and 500 inmates.

Advertisement

Most tattoos he sports today, he got as an inmate . He hid tobacco up his ass in a latex glove so he could sell it. He also saw riots, an OD, murder and fights, during one of which he lost a tooth. He continues experiencing nightmares and PTSD. When he got out in 2009, he met iPhones and his new baby daughter.

“Prison was the best thing for me; it humbled me,” he says. “There’s no more fighting. There is only using your words. It showed me discipline and being sober in there, I got to look outside myself and realize all the people that I hurt, that love me. I learned in prison when you make a mistake, you confess to it, you fix it and you grow.”

Fifteen years later, Perez’s credits include Netflix, HBO and the film “Taco Shop” with Carlos Alazraqui, Esparza and Brian Huskey. He records his first-hand “George Perez Stories” podcast and YouTube videos in a studio wallpapered with every vinyl comedy album he can find. His own January 2024 vinyl album “This Cholo Is Crazy” even featured sketch and music.

George Perez

“I mean, you can’t cancel me. I went to prison for three years when my comedy was in its prime, came out and I’m doing better than I was before,” Perez said. “I’m not looking to be on a sitcom. I want to be an artistic comedian.”

(Estevan Oriol)

Advertisement

Something else had happened that he didn’t address for years. “I dig deep,” he says of the impetus for “Misunderstood.” “I had a son that passed away because the babysitter left him in the tub.” He wasn’t allowed to attend services. Following three years out on parole, he tangled with cocaine. “Drugs would numb me and I wouldn’t think about my son and the bad things that have happened to me in my life, friends that I’ve lost.”

Today he continues to be more honest about past tragedies and new growth than ever. At most, there’s a little tequila now and then to celebrate. His time in prison, journeys with addiction and struggles with mental health; all of it part of Perez’s artistic expression. “I just started writing. I’m no longer up there going, ‘Latinos make some noise!’ It’s, ‘This hurts, and I have to find a way out.’ It’s personal.”

“I mean, you can’t cancel me. I went to prison for three years when my comedy was in its prime, came out and I’m doing better than I was before. I’m not looking to be on a sitcom. I want to be an artistic comedian. When someone sees me onstage, like, ‘This guy looks like me. He’s gone through the same thing I’ve gone through.’ That’s what I want to accomplish.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Sonic the Hedgehog 3 (2024) – Movie Review

Published

on

Sonic the Hedgehog 3 (2024) – Movie Review

Sonic the Hedgehog 3, 2024.

Directed by Jeff Fowler.
Starring Ben Schwartz, Jim Carrey, Keanu Reeves, Idris Elba, Colleen O’Shaughnessey, Krysten Ritter, James Marsden, Tika Sumpter, Alyla Browne, Lee Majdoub, Natasha Rothwell, Shemar Moore, Adam Pally, Tom Butler, James Wolk, Jorma Taccone, Cristo Fernández, and Sofia Pernas.

SYNOPSIS:

Sonic, Knuckles, and Tails reunite against a powerful new adversary, Shadow, a mysterious villain with powers unlike anything they have faced before. With their abilities outmatched, Team Sonic must seek out an unlikely alliance.

Advertisement

Watching Sonic the Hedgehog 3 is a vindicating experience. For years (possibly decades by now), whether it be the first two Sonic the Hedgehog movies, Bayformers, and plenty of other examples that exist out there, there has always been a firm feeling among many that if these filmmakers and studios forced aside the damn human characters and focused on who viewers are here to see (which doesn’t mean crowded, embarrassing fan service), the results would likely be worthwhile.

This might be the first live-action/CGI hybrid feature of its kind that almost entirely does away with its already established human characters (discounting staples of the game people actually want to see, such as Jim Carrey’s returning Dr. Robotnik, once again with ample screen time) and trust that there is enough compelling story within the source material to adapt sincerely that fans and nonfans alike will come away satisfied.

Granted, in the case of Sonic the Hedgehog, director Jeff Fowler (who has directed all three of these firms) didn’t have much to work with since the Sega Genesis games weren’t necessarily known for story or characterization (as the games branched out into different gameplay mechanics and evolved with the industry’s technology, so came attempts at telling stories within them), somewhat forced to bring human characters into a cinematic adaptation. However, over the previous two films, he and screenwriters Pat Casey, Josh Miller, and John Whittington have gradually and gracefully brought in more nonhuman characters to join forces with the lightning-fast Sonic (voiced by a returning Ben Schwartz), such as tech gadget specialist fox Tails (voiced by Colleen O’Shaughnessey) and brawling, literal-minded Echidna warrior Knuckles (another amusing voiceover performance from Idris Elba.)

This installment brings Shadow the Hedgehog into the mix, bursting with chaos energy and hell-bent on revenge-fueled destruction. Toss in a long-lost grandfather Robotnik (also played by Jim Carrey, opening up an entire separate dimension for his reliably impressive brand of physical comedy and strange noises), and the filmmakers now have enough characters to where the likable but also intrusive human additions can be pushed off into the background, making an appearance for cameo purposes or when it actually fits the story being told. Despite that, some human cameos don’t need to be here, aren’t funny, and feel contractually obligated more than anything. For the most part, though, everything is much more tolerable and sensible.

Aside from the prologue, when Sonic’s human best friend Tom (James Marsden) and his partner Maddie (Tika Sumpter) pop up, it’s not solely for jokes but typically to push forward a specific central theme regarding loved ones, dealing with anger, and important choices in life that directly correlate to with what Shadow (voiced by Keanu Reeves in John Wick mode, which is pleasantly fitting for the character) is going through.

Advertisement

Having been contained and studied for roughly 50 years upon being discovered in a meteorite crash, Shadow has escaped and is obsessed with bringing forth chaos and ensuring others feel his pain. Such torment movingly plays out in flashbacks, revealing that while he was frequently experimented on, Commander Walters’ daughter Maria (Furiosa‘s Alyla Browne, already a notable effusive presence from these two movies alone) occasionally broke him out to play and developed a close bond. She became the only bright spot in his experience on Earth, meaning that one doesn’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that something tragic eventually happened.

It appears that whoever is cooperating with Shadow is also utilizing whatever is left of Dr. Robotnik’s technological weapons. The mad scientist turns out to still be alive and has put on a few pounds (although not quite as heavy as the character’s depiction in the video games, but considering there are more movies to come, one presumes he might not be done gaining weight) while watching Spanish soap operas and chilling with his loyal minion Agent Stone (Lee Majdoub.) Enemies decide to join forces to discover who is behind the commotion temporarily. Agent Stone realizes that Sonic and company aren’t just a team but also friends, a dynamic he wishes he could have with Dr. Robotnik. As previously mentioned, Dr. Robotnik discovers that his grandfather (just as diabolically insane and intelligent) is alive, paving the way for another familial dynamic and some nutty off-the-wall chemistry between two Jim Carreys.

And while there are unquestionably brief stretches of horrendously delivered dramatic dialogue from supporting characters and cringe gags (dancing across a hallway filled with lasers), there is a moving-through line of heroes and villains forced to look within themselves and determine who they ultimately want to be, especially as betrayals occur. Perhaps most importantly, it leads to impressively staged action that is epic in scale, showcasing Sonic and Shadow beating each other senseless across the entire planet and into outer space, amplified by genuinely emotional stakes regarding love and loss.

With Sonic the Hedgehog 3, Jeff Fowler and company have found the right balance of humor (even Jim Carrey feels reinvigorated and energized more than in the first two, up for the goofy acting challenge presented that is right inside his slapstick wheelhouse, while also simply given mostly funnier material to work with) and frenzied action elevated by strong, vibrant CGI (this is unquestionably one of the better-looking special-effects extravaganzas of recent memory) alongside an engaging story. There is a case to be made that Shadow’s back story could have been even longer and not limited to a couple of flashbacks, but the right characters here are put front and center, which makes all the difference for a Sonic adaptation to click.

Sonic the Hedgehog 3 is aware it doesn’t always “gotta go fast,” occasionally slowing down to ensure we care about these characters while laying out its themes with affecting sincerity.

Advertisement

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ ★ ★ / Movie: ★ ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association and the Critics Choice Association. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews, follow my Twitter or Letterboxd, or email me at MetalGearSolid719@gmail.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending