Crypto
Why Cryptocurrency Is Back in the Art Market
Art Market
Arun Kakar
Maurizio Cattelan, Comedian, 2019. Courtesy of Sotheby’s.
It may not have been the most expensive sale from last week’s marquee slate of auctions in New York, but there was no question that Maurizio Cattelan’s Comedian (2019) was the most talked-about lot of the week.
The work, a banana duct-taped to a wall, sold for $6.2 million at Sotheby’s, including fees, well above its $1 million–$1.5 million estimate. But the sale was also notable for another reason: Sotheby’s confirmed that the winning bidder, cryptocurrency entrepreneur Justin Sun, would pay in cryptocurrency.
The sale was part of a growing trend that’s been gathering steam once again in the art world: the growth in prominence of cryptocurrencies. Museum acquisitions, new collectors, and even a meme coin have all made their way into art world headlines in recent months, sparking discussion about the role of these tokens in the market.
Sun, in speaking about the sale, recognized its significance as a case study of how the crypto community could be involved in the conversation around artworks, particularly those with viral potential online. “This is not just an artwork; it represents a cultural phenomenon that bridges the worlds of art, memes, and the cryptocurrency community,” said Sun. “I believe this piece will inspire more thought and discussion in the future and will become a part of history.”
Cryptocurrencies in the art market
The sale of Comedian in crypto has shocked corners of the art world but comes as less of a surprise to others.
“Cryptocurrency wealth is now encroaching on spaces once dominated by traditional collectors and has become hard for the art world to ignore,” said Alejandro Cartagena, co-founder of Fellowship, a gallery specializing in human-machine collaboration. “Crypto entrepreneurs are bringing new energy to the art world, challenging its established hierarchies and expanding its horizons in an exciting new dynamic.”
While they have been around since the creation of Bitcoin in 2009, cryptocurrencies first entered the art market mainstream in 2021 when they gained a huge rise in public popularity. This came mainly in the growth of non-fungible tokens (NFTs), unique digital identifiers that use blockchain technology to certify ownership of artworks, along with other assets. While NFTs are distinct from cryptocurrencies, both rely on blockchain technology and are associated with each other.
While the fervor around the NFT market has cooled since they initially burst onto the market, demand for this type of work is, like other cryptocurrencies, rallying towards the end of 2024. According to MSN, the NFT market is on track to close November with “strong momentum,” following an October where there was $356 million in sales volume—an 18% increase from September.
“Interest in cryptocurrencies within the art market is growing, although not as fervently as during the crypto boom of 2020–21,” said Stefanie De Regel, head of development for digital art platform TAEX. “This steady growth reflects the evolving integration of blockchain technology and the art world, driven by opportunities…such as NFTs, and innovative platforms for creative expression.”
Why cryptocurrencies are surging
The frenzy around the Cattelan sale underscored the fact that crypto is back in a big way, more than ever following the reelection of Donald Trump in the U.S. Though most cryptocurrencies slumped in the “crypto winter” of 2022 (a sign of their essential volatility), they are now on the rise again.
Earlier this month, the global crypto market reached a $3.2 trillion high, spurred on by a belief that the incoming president will enact crypto-friendly regulatory policies. This was boosted further last week when Trump nominated the pro-crypto hedge fund manager Scott Bessent as his treasury secretary, which caused Bitcoin to surge to a new all-time high.
There are other cultural signals for crypto market watchers, showing that the incoming administration intends to acknowledge its importance. Another Trump appointment, Elon Musk, will co-lead a newly set-up “Department of Governmental Efficiency,” (abbreviated to DOGE, likely in a sly reference to the meme coin Dogecoin). Musk is a crypto enthusiast, and once vowed to send Dogecoin “to the moon,” a popular slang used in crypto circles to express conviction. The cryptocurrency with the new department’s name has surged to a three-year high this month.
What is a memecoin?
Bitcoin isn’t the only cryptocurrency on the market: There are thousands more blockchain-backed currencies and tokens that are traded online. And the Cattelan sale also led to a bull run of its own. The cryptocurrency $BAN or Comedian is unaffiliated with Sotheby’s but describes itself as “inspired by Maurizio Cattelan’s artwork, featuring a banana taped to a wall.” The coin was picked up in the chatter of speculators online, who began trading it at high volumes. The meme coin (a term given to cryptocurrencies that are typically inspired by internet and cultural trends) saw its market cap—the total value of all its coins—surge to $300 million. It is now listed on major crypto exchanges such as Binance and Bybit—a significant sign of legitimacy in the crypto world.
Later, it was revealed that Michael Bouhanna, head of digital art and NFTs at Sotheby’s, created the cryptocurrency $BAN as what he called a “spontaneous project and a personal hobby” inspired by the “conceptual questioning of value,” which Comedian as an artwork represents.
As the price began to climb and the coin gained traction in crypto circles, Bouhanna was accused on social media of “insider trading.” Bouhanna took to X to deny accusations that he’d made $1 million in profit, noting that he did not “promote $BAN or encourage anyone to buy it.”
Cryptocurrency and museums
Yatreda ያጥሬዳ, Abyssinian Queen, 2024. Courtesy of Yatreda ያጥሬዳ.
Institutional support for NFTs has also become more widespread. NFTs are in the collections of the Centre Pompidou and LACMA. Last week, the Toledo Museum of Art in Ohio became the first major museum to acquire artwork using cryptocurrency when it purchased the digital artwork Abyssinian Queen (2024) by the Ethiopian artist collective Yatreda ያጥሬዳ. The purchase was made using USDC, a stable coin (a cryptocurrency that is pegged to a traditional, or “fiat” currency like USD or euro).
The decision to purchase the work, explained Adam Levine, the museum’s president, director, and CEO, was to “respect and align with the practices of the artist collective we were working with.”
“Just as we would pay in euros when purchasing from a French gallery or in pounds when dealing with an English auction house, it felt appropriate to transact in the preferred currency of Yatreda ያጥሬዳ, a web3 artist collective,” he told Artsy.
Where next for cryptocurrencies in the art market?
Comedian is unlikely to be the last headline-grabbing sale to be paid for in a blockchain-backed currency.
Cryptocurrencies are bringing new collectors into the art market with their own set of motivations, Cartagena points out. “We’re seeing a convergence of tech entrepreneurs and traditional collectors that fosters new dialogues,” he said. “We’ve also noticed that crypto collectors are less interested in singular ownership and more fascinated by shared authorship, networked systems, and ideas of co-creation. This dovetails with how artists are thinking about AI, decentralized platforms, and collaborative processes.”
This is reflected in auction sales, too. For example, Sotheby’s announced that it would accept cryptocurrency for A.I. God. Portrait of Alan Turing (2024), the first artwork to be painted by a humanoid robot. It sold for $1.08 million, far outstripping its estimate. Sales such as this are unlikely to be the last of their kind as crypto’s role in the art market becomes increasingly hard to ignore.
“Since Bitcoin’s inception only 16 years ago, the combined market capitalization of cryptocurrency globally has grown from $0 to more than $3 trillion; that value surpasses the GDP of the U.K. or France and is more than the market capitalization of any company in the world except NVIDIA and Apple,” said Levine. “Seen this way, it is hard to imagine how such value accumulation will not impact the art world.”
Arun Kakar
Arun Kakar is Artsy’s Art Market Editor.
Crypto
US Treasury to offer free cybersecurity intelligence to crypto firms
Crypto
Bitcoin and Ether ETFs Add Combined $443 Million in Strong Inflow Day
Key Takeaways:
- Bitcoin ETFs saw $358.17 million inflows on April 9, led by Blackrock IBIT, restoring momentum.
- Ether ETFs added $85.19 million as ETHA gained $90.94 million, showing selective but rising demand.
- XRP lost $661K while Solana saw no flows, suggesting capital is still fluctuating between altcoin ETFs.
Market Turns Decisively Positive for Bitcoin and Ether ETFs
No day is ever the same in the exchange-traded fund (ETF) market, and on Thursday, April 9, the tide turned again. This time, with force.
After a stretch of uneven flows and fading conviction, crypto ETFs snapped back into positive territory, delivering one of the week’s strongest sessions. The recovery was broad, decisive, and led by familiar names.
Bitcoin ETFs recorded a powerful $358.17 million in net inflows, marking a clean reversal from the prior day’s losses. Notably, every major fund contributed, and no outflows were recorded.
Blackrock’s IBIT once again dominated the field, pulling in $269.34 million, roughly three-quarters of total inflows. The scale of that contribution underscored its continued role as the market’s anchor. Fidelity’s FBTC followed with a solid $53.33 million, while Morgan Stanley’s newly launched MSBT added $14.87 million, building on its early momentum.
Further support came from Bitwise’s BITB with $11.73 million, Ark & 21Shares’ ARKB at $4.78 million, Vaneck’s HODL with $2.04 million, and Franklin’s EZBC at $2.08 million. Trading volume reached $1.99 billion, and net assets climbed to $93.29 billion.
Ether ETFs mirrored the rebound, though with a more mixed internal picture. The group posted $85.19 million in net inflows, driven by strong demand for select funds.
Blackrock’s ETHA led with $90.94 million, while its ETHB product added another $13.67 million, continuing its steady rise in investor preference. Grayscale’s Ether Mini Trust contributed $9.67 million.
Yet selling pressure persisted elsewhere. Fidelity’s FETH recorded a $20.98 million outflow, followed by 21Shares’ TETH with $5.53 million. Smaller outflows were seen in Franklin’s EZET at $1.68 million and Grayscale’s ETHE at $900,440. Despite these exits, inflows held firm. Trading volume came in at $831.08 million, with net assets closing at $12.69 billion.
Outside the majors, activity was limited. XRP ETFs posted a modest $661,160 outflow, entirely from 21Shares’ TOXR. Trading volume stood at $11.03 million, with net assets at $955.13 million.
Solana ETFs remained inactive for the session, with no recorded flows. Net assets held steady at $803.03 million.
The broader pattern is becoming clearer. Capital is returning, but it is concentrated. Investors are favoring scale, liquidity, and established names, particularly in bitcoin and select ether products. The market is not fully stable, but confidence is rebuilding in visible pockets.
Crypto
Morgan Stanley Low-Fee Bitcoin ETF Sparks Fee War Across Issuers, Analyst Says
Key Takeaways:
- Morgan Stanley launched MSBT with a 0.14% fee, undercutting Blackrock IBIT and escalating a bitcoin ETF fee war.
- Bloomberg analyst says the fee war could squeeze issuer margins while expanding investor access.
- Blackrock dominance may persist unless outflows rise or a 10 bps Vanguard entrant disrupts pricing power.
Morgan Stanley Sparks Bitcoin ETF Fee War With Aggressive Pricing
The launch of a lower-cost bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) is intensifying structural competition across digital asset markets. Morgan Stanley, a global investment bank, rolled out its bitcoin ETF (NYSE Arca: MSBT) with a 0.14% expense ratio on April 8, undercutting Blackrock’s Ishares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and signaling a new phase of aggressive pricing pressure. This shift highlights how fee compression could redefine issuer margins and investor allocation strategies.
Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Eric Balchunas addressed the implications of Morgan Stanley’s pricing move. He stated on social media platform X:
“MSBT coming at 14bps could entice others to cut, or new entrants to come in even lower.”
The remark signals that MSBT’s ultra-competitive fee could reset industry benchmarks, accelerating price competition among incumbents while lowering barriers for new ETF entrants.
Across the competitive landscape, MSBT now ranks among the lowest-cost bitcoin ETFs, undercutting Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ( BTC) at 0.15% and Franklin Templeton’s EZBC at 0.19%. Other major issuers, including Bitwise (BITB), Vaneck (HODL), and ARK 21Shares (ARKB), cluster between 0.20% and 0.21%, while Blackrock’s IBIT, Fidelity’s FBTC, and several peers maintain 0.25% fee structures. At the higher end, Grayscale’s legacy GBTC remains at 1.50%, reflecting its structural differences and earlier market entry. This spread highlights a rapidly compressing fee band, with new entrants increasingly targeting sub-20 basis point pricing to gain share.
Fee Pressure Threatens Margins While Strengthening Investor Power
Morgan Stanley’s broader strategy suggests ambitions beyond simple fee disruption, with projections pointing to as much as $160 billion in potential inflows tied to its bitcoin ETF initiative. That scale could materially pressure Blackrock’s IBIT, which benefits from deep liquidity, tight spreads, and strong institutional adoption. The firm’s positioning underscores a growing trend where traditional financial giants leverage distribution advantages to capture crypto market share.
Balchunas emphasized the broader economic consequences of intensifying fee competition across the ETF sector. He remarked:
“Fee wars are part of life in the Terrordome = hell for issuers, but heaven for investors. That said, prob won’t see any cut from IBIT.”
The observation underscores a structural reality: declining fees enhance investor access while compressing issuer margins, forcing providers to rely on scale, flows, and operational efficiency.
Despite mounting pressure, market leadership continues to provide pricing resilience for dominant funds. Balchunas stressed that IBIT’s scale and liquidity concentration preserve its pricing power, with disruption likely only if competitors generate sustained outflows or if Vanguard files a near-10 basis point product, a scenario he considers highly improbable. This dynamic indicates that IBIT’s fee stability remains anchored in its liquidity advantage unless a significant competitive shift materializes.
-
Atlanta, GA6 days ago1 teenage girl killed, another injured in shooting at Piedmont Park, police say
-
Education1 week agoVideo: YouTube’s C.E.O. on the Rise of Video and the Decline of Reading
-
Movie Reviews1 week agoVaazha 2 first half review: Hashir anchors a lively, chaos-filled teen tale
-
Georgia3 days agoGeorgia House Special Runoff Election 2026 Live Results
-
Education1 week agoVideo: Toy Testing with a Discerning Bodega Cat
-
Pennsylvania4 days agoParents charged after toddler injured by wolf at Pennsylvania zoo
-
Milwaukee, WI4 days agoPotawatomi Casino Hotel evacuated after fire breaks out in rooftop HVAC system
-
Entertainment1 week agoInside Ye’s first comeback show at SoFi Stadium