Connect with us

Crypto

What is the strategic bitcoin reserve that Trump is promising and how would it work?

Published

on

What is the strategic bitcoin reserve that Trump is promising and how would it work?

The US election results are monopolizing the debate in the crypto world. Donald Trump’s victory has taken Bitcoin to levels never seen before. In fact, for days now, a single Bitcoin is nearing $100,000, which has investors holding their breath. Other altcoins are joining in this euphoria, breaking new records. This includes Solana, as well as XRP — Ripple’s currency — which has seen triple-digit growth.

The cryptocurrency sector — already euphoric about the election of a pro-crypto president who wants to gut financial regulations — is now awaiting the materialization of the numerous promises that the Republican candidate made during the 2024 campaign.

Experts warn that it remains to be seen whether the tycoon will actually be able to honor his announcements. But, for the moment, the industry’s wishes seem to be fulfilled. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler — who has been skeptical and sometimes hostile to cryptocurrencies over the years — has already announced that he will step down as head of the securities market supervisor on January 20 at noon, just as Trump takes office. Meanwhile, the Republican recently named Scott Bessent as his nominee for the Department of the Treasury.

Bessent — in an interview with Fox Business earlier this year — said that cryptocurrencies “are about freedom and the crypto economy is here to stay. These assets are attracting young people, who haven’t participated in the [stock market].” But one of the promises that most excites the industry and investors is the possibility of creating a strategic reserve of bitcoins in the U.S. Trump mentioned this project back in June, during the Bitcoin 2024 conference held in Nashville, Tennessee. The proposal has deeply resonated with the sector.

What is a strategic bitcoin reserve?

A strategic reserve is a set of external assets that are immediately available and under the control of the monetary authorities. They’re meant to meet the financing needs of the balance of payments, or to intervene in the foreign exchange markets in order to influence the exchange rate, to name just some examples. In this way, a bitcoin reserve would be similar to the gold and foreign currency reserves held by central banks. There are also strategic reserves of basic raw materials, such as oil.

Advertisement

The pioneering cryptocurrencies would be incorporated into the mix of assets that the North American country has on its balance sheet, with the aim of diversifying reserves. However, the project isn’t clearly laid out and there’s still much speculation on the matter, starting with the basic question of which authority would be responsible for managing it. Would it be the Federal Reserve? Or another institution? And the no less important question concerns how to pay for it. Bitcoins could be purchased after selling off other assets — such as gold or bonds — increasing debt, or expanding the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet, an operation that is colloquially known as “printing money.”

This reserve would also include the bitcoins that the U.S. administration has seized to-date: some 208,109, worth almost $20 billion at the current market price. These include the cryptocurrencies confiscated in 2013 from Ross Ulbricht, the founder of Silk Road, a dark web that operated exclusively in bitcoin. Users would traffic drugs and hire hitmen, among other things. During the election campaign, Donald Trump promised to commute Ulbricht’s life sentence upon reaching the White House.

What does the proposal look like?

The most concrete proposal so far is that of pro-crypto Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis, who introduced her Bitcoin Act of 2024 (Boosting Innovation, Technology and Competitiveness through Optimized Investment Nationwide Act) in the Senate. This project provides for the Treasury and the Federal Reserve to buy 200,000 bitcoins each year for a period of five years, until reaching one million units. This would represent about 5% of the total global supply of bitcoins, which is around 21 million. The reserve would subsequently be maintained for a minimum of 20 years. The idea is that this reserve would serve as a hedge against the devaluation of the U.S. dollar, to strengthen national balance sheets and support future debt issues.

In the legislation, the proposed mechanism to purchase the cryptocurrency has two elements: on the one hand, the surplus that the Federal Reserve returns to the Treasury (i.e. the profits of the U.S. central banking system) would be used to buy bitcoin. On the other hand, it proposes that the central banks of each state reassess the gold certificates they hold, to better reflect the value of the metal in the current market. They must then deliver the difference to the Treasury, which will use the funds to buy bitcoin.

Noelle Achenson — author of the Crypto is Macro Now newsletter — explains that the Fed has certificates on its balance sheet that represent the gold held by the Treasury. The total valuation is approximately $10.5 billion. However, this value is based on a legal price that, since 1973, has remained constant at $42 per ounce. If valued at current prices, the stored gold would be worth about $643 billion.

Advertisement

Beyond the federal administration, states are also moving to have their own bitcoin reserves. Mike Cabell — a member of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives — recently introduced a bill for the creation of a strategic bitcoin reserve to allow the state treasury to invest up to 10% of its funds in bitcoin. The aim of this legislation is for the cryptocurrency to serve as a hedge against inflation. However, the details of the proposed regulations are still unknown.

What have other countries done?

El Salvador has been a pioneer in creating a strategic crypto reserve. In fact, the Central American country was the first to adopt bitcoin as legal tender in September of 2021. The government has since acquired up to 5,944 bitcoin, valued at more than $560 million at the current market price, according to the country’s Bitcoin Office. Added to this is the kingdom of Bhutan, which owns 12,218 bitcoins, valued at $1.2 billion, according to data from the firm Arkham Intelligence. The firm details that the fortune of this crypto state comes from bitcoin mining operations (taking advantage of the national orography for the generation of electrical energy) carried out by the country’s investment arm, the state-owned conglomerate Druk Holdings.

Other nations that own the pioneering cryptocurrency have mainly accumulated it through confiscations, as is the case of the United States. But beyond the North American country, other states have been collecting bitcoin in recent years. The United Kingdom, in fact, has an account with 61,245 tokens, worth more than $6 billion.

Experts also point to China as one of the largest holders of this cryptocurrency. In November of 2020, authorities confiscated 194,775 bitcoin from members of the PlusToken Ponzi scheme, a scam operating in the Asian country that promised its victims “constant” double-digit returns. The perpetrators of this scam collected cryptocurrencies worth billions of dollars, which they then used to buy properties and luxury cars for themselves or their relatives. However — according to Arkham Investments — it’s unclear whether the Chinese government still owns these seized bitcoins, or has since sold them.

What do the analysts say?

The experts consulted by EL PAÍS disagree on the possibility of this project being carried out. Luis Garvía — director of the Financial Risk graduate program at the Madrid-based Catholic Institute of Business Administration (ICADE) — is blunt: “It seems absolutely reasonable to me that any government should have a part of its reserves in bitcoin. Diversification is very important,” he emphasizes.

Advertisement

Carlos Salinas — a professor in the master’s degree program in Blockchain and Digital Asset Investment at the IEB — believes that the promise of creating a bitcoin reserve is one of the main drivers of the asset’s surging price. However, he doubts that the U.S. can accumulate such a large quantity of bitcoin, although he doesn’t rule it out entirely. And, if the proposed legislation indeed sees the light of day, other nations — such as Russia, China, Brazil, or India — wouldn’t want to be left out: “At the last highs of bitcoin in 2021, we saw the FOMO, but in this current bullish phase, we’re [dealing] with institutional FOMO. We don’t know how big this can become,” he warns

For his part, Javier Molina — a senior market analyst at eToro — doubts that bitcoin can ever be considered a store of value like gold, nor that there will ever be a large-scale adoption of the currency by governments, at least in the short and medium-term. “While the idea that bitcoin could one day play a role similar to that of gold as a store of value — like ‘digital gold’ — may be interesting, I think we’re still far from seeing a race for digital reserves at the government level,” he opines.

David Tercero-Lucas is a professor of Economics at ICADE. He specializes in cryptoassets and digital currencies. He highlights that, while bitcoin shares certain characteristics with traditional assets — such as gold, for example, given its scarcity and its independence from centralized entities — it lacks other essential characteristics typical of reliable reserve assets. “Gold has a millennia-old history as a store of value; it’s widely-accepted and has industrial uses that reinforce its usefulness. Currencies, such as the dollar, are backed by robust states and financial systems. Bitcoin, on the other hand, is extremely volatile and its value depends more on speculative expectations than on tangible fundamentals,” he details.

Therefore, according to this expert, selling gold to buy this cryptocurrency is risky, especially since its capacity to serve as a strategic reserve in crisis contexts has never been validated in the long-term. He also points out that the idea that this asset cannot be sold for 20 years — one of the requirements included in the Bitcoin Act — doesn’t offer financial resilience in the short-term. In fact, it contradicts the purpose of a strategic reserve, which should be available to stabilize the economy in emergency situations.

Santiago Carbó — a professor of Economics at the University of Valencia — agrees with this analysis. He warns that the proposed U.S. legislation sets a dangerous precedent: “Bitcoin has been anything but a stable value until now.” He trusts in the orthodoxy of the Federal Reserve to prevent this project from being approved, while still recognizing the growing acceptance of this cryptocurrency among investors. He also points to the lack of transparency in the crypto market, its lack of maturity and high levels of risk that make it unreliable as a reserve asset.

Advertisement

The expert consulted by EL PAÍS who’s most wary about the launch of a strategic reserve is Manuel Villegas, a digital asset analyst at Julius Baer. For him, there’s still a lot of noise around the idea. “The market has anticipated a lot and I think it hasn’t yet fully understood that this is [a serious] proposal. There’s a lot of speculation about what may happen. But the Federal Reserve is an independent authority and, in recent months, Jerome Powell hasn’t been very favorable to this issue,” he warns. Moreover, unlike SEC Chair Gary Gensler, the Fed chairman already made it clear at the last Fed meeting that he doesn’t intend to resign and that Trump cannot fire him.

Add to this another factor: market concentration. According to Villegas, buying 200,000 bitcoins a year in a market as illiquid as the current one could drive prices up excessively. And, on the other hand, it could concentrate a large part of the supply of this cryptocurrency in the hands of the U.S.: “It would become one of the largest holders of the asset, with 5% in reserves. [We also must add] the 3% held by MicroStrategy [which already has about $17 billion worth of bitcoin on its balance sheet] plus the holdings of Marathon and BlackRock,” he concludes.

While Bitcoin investors and the industry are rubbing their hands gleefully at the prospect of the pioneering cryptocurrency’s value skyrocketing even further, prediction markets indicate that this project won’t happen: the odds of the U.S. having its own Bitcoin strategic reserve stand at just 30% on Polymarket.

Translated by Avik Jain Chatlani.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition

Advertisement

Crypto

Nonprofits face challenges with cryptocurrency | Samuel French

Published

on

Nonprofits face challenges with cryptocurrency | Samuel French
play

  • Nonprofits can either convert crypto donations to cash immediately or hold them as an investment.
  • Cryptocurrency is treated as a property donation by the IRS, not as a currency donation.
  • Experts advise nonprofits to seek professional financial guidance before accepting and managing cryptocurrency.

Nonprofits and cryptocurrency donations are increasingly being used to put old-fashioned money in the bank.

Cryptocurrency valuations over time are such that more nonprofits are opening up to accepting crypto and converting it to cash, or holding on to it for hoped-for long-term value increases.

Advertisement

Principal factors that have held back nonprofits’ acceptance of crypto donations are uncertainty about how it works, valuation volatility, tax implications and regulatory considerations. But the strains on traditional fundraising and the potential gain nonprofits can realize from crypto are driving them to explore — or accept — this nontraditional funding source. Other issues are not having a vehicle in place to accept crypto, and many nonprofits as regards crypto haven’t updated their internal investment policies and donation acceptance policies.

Crypto’s name is based on combining cryptography (encrypted codes) with currency. There is no government central bank or other authority creating crypto. An internet artificial intelligence overview explains crypto creation as follows, and don’t be surprised if it seems almost a foreign language: “Cryptocurrency is created through decentralized digital processes, primarily mining or validation, rather than being minted by a central bank. New coins are generated as rewards for securing the blockchain network, verifying transactions, and solving complex mathematical problems, using specialized computer hardware.”

Crypto valuation has something in common with the plush toys called Beanie Babies. Beginning in 1993, Beanie Babies were a craze for a short time. As the idea of a collectible toy spread, demand grew; scarcity and restrained production drove costs higher. Long lines formed at stores so the newest ones could be grabbed as they went on shelves. Today, many Beanie Babies can be bought on eBay for $5.99, though some rare, mint-condition Babies sell for thousands. Why the high and the low? That’s what people are willing to pay.

Basically, crypto has value because it’s believed and accepted to have value. Key valuation factors include supply and demand and crypto’s controlled, decentralized nature outside the traditional fiat currency structure. There are many forms of crypto; Bitcoin, the largest crypto variation, has seen spectacular gains in value as well as encountering substantial valuation declines.

Advertisement

Bitcoin debuted in 2009 with essentially no value. On Oct. 6, 2025, Bitcoin reached its high-water mark of $126,198.07. At 2 p.m. on March 11, Bitcoin was at $70,268.35. Bankrate.com explains Bitcoin’s value driver: “The price of Bitcoin is notoriously driven by sentiment. When the market shifts to its ‘greed’ phase, Bitcoin soars amid the utopian promises and speculators dismiss the risks of an asset that generates no cash flow. In the ‘fear’ phase, Bitcoin’s price seems to find no traction, as sellers push its price lower amid bad news or general market malaise.” In short, Bitcoin, or any crypto, is worth what the buyer will pay.

The IRS treats crypto as a digital asset, along with stablecoin (stable because it’s tied to stable assets like gold or the U.S. dollar) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs, one-of-a-kind cryptographic tokens on a blockchain, that can’t be replicated.) Nonprofits receiving crypto donations must treat them for tax purposes as property donations rather than currency donations. The IRS’s “Frequently asked questions on virtual currency transactions” page lists IRS notices and links to pages dealing with crypto’s tax implications.

A nonprofit with crypto donations can’t go down to the bank and hand them to a teller to cash in the donations. Financial institutions use third-party processors, just as a nonprofit would use an exchange or processor to make the conversion. The National Council of Nonprofits provides a detailed look at crypto donations and conversion in “What Your Nonprofit Needs to Know About Cryptocurrency Donations.”

Nonprofits can seek to convert their crypto donations to cash as soon as the donation is in hand. If Bitcoin, the amount, even if well off the high, will still likely be substantial. Other types, not so much. The question confronting every nonprofit looking at a crypto donation is whether to sell or buy and hold? The decision depends substantially on the organization’s immediate needs — and if they’re willing to bet the value will increase — because that’s what it is, a bet.

Advertisement

Nonprofits are best advised to seek the advice of accounting or finance professionals fluent and experienced in cryptocurrency language and disposition strategies, and who walk nonprofit leaders through the substance of crypto merits and demerits. The outcome will give a stronger basis for decisions on if, when and how much money from a crypto donation will actually go into the bank.

Samuel French is president of the accounting and business consulting firm Rodefer Moss & Co. PLLC, headquartered in Knoxville. The company’s website is rodefermoss.com.

Continue Reading

Crypto

Trust Wallet Adds AI Transaction Layer to Self-Custody Wallet Infrastructure

Published

on

Trust Wallet Adds AI Transaction Layer to Self-Custody Wallet Infrastructure

Trust Wallet Agent Kit: AI Can Now Act on Your Crypto — With Your Permission

The kit ships in two configurations. In the first, developers set up a dedicated wallet built specifically for AI agent activity, where users define permissions upfront, and the agent can run automated strategies like dollar-cost averaging, limit orders, and price alerts, without asking for approval on every transaction.

In the second configuration, an AI agent connects to a user’s existing Trust Wallet through Walletconnect, proposes transactions, and waits for the user to approve them before anything moves. The firm notes that the user’s custody stays intact throughout.

The release follows Trust Wallet’s Developer Portal, which opened last week with read-only access to crypto data across more than 100 blockchains, including live prices, token metadata, and onchain risk signals. The Agent Kit extends that foundation by adding the ability to act, not just observe.

At launch, supported networks include Ethereum-compatible chains, Solana, Bitcoin, BNB Chain, Cosmos, TON, Aptos, Tron, NEAR, and Sui. Trust Wallet says that coverage makes it the broadest chain-compatible AI wallet infrastructure currently available.

The kit integrates with Model Context Protocol (MCP), the standard developers use to connect AI systems to external platforms, and is available through a command line interface. According to the company’s announcement, a developer can go from account creation to a working AI agent in under 15 minutes.

Advertisement

Out-of-the-box features include token swaps, limit orders, automated strategies, ENS resolution, ERC-20 approvals, message signing, portfolio tracking, wallet auto-lock, and a REST API for deeper integrations.

Felix Fan, CEO of Trust Wallet, remarked in a statement that AI agents need a trusted layer before they can safely act on a user’s finances. The Agent Kit, he said, gives developers the tools to build agents that execute on real wallets within rules the user sets.

Trust Wallet, which reports more than 220 million downloads, describes its broader goal as becoming the self-custody infrastructure for AI-powered finance, a foundational layer that lets AI participate in crypto workflows without users surrendering ownership of their assets.

The company plans to bring AI features directly to end users inside the Trust Wallet app over the coming months, with in-wallet insights, automated strategies, and personalized alerts. A separate Agent Marketplace is also on the roadmap, where developers can publish reusable agent strategies and trading bots for users to deploy directly from their wallets.

Trust Wallet’s development arrives as a growing number of crypto firms roll out services and features tailored to the emerging agentic economy. Since the debut of Openclaw, interest in AI agents has accelerated profoundly, with companies such as Circle, Binance, Coinbase, and a myriad of others unveiling tools and infrastructure focused squarely on this evolving segment.

Advertisement

FAQ 🔎

  • What is the Trust Wallet Agent Kit? It is a developer tool that allows AI agents to execute real crypto transactions on a user’s wallet across more than 25 supported blockchains.
  • How does Trust Wallet keep users in control of AI transactions? Users can require per-transaction approval through WalletConnect or configure preset permissions on a dedicated agent wallet before any automation runs.
  • What blockchains does the Trust Wallet Agent Kit support? At launch it supports Ethereum-compatible chains, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Cosmos, TON, Aptos, Tron, NEAR, and Sui.
  • Where can developers access the Trust Wallet Agent Kit? The kit is available now via the Trust Wallet Developer Portal at portal.trustwallet.com.
Continue Reading

Crypto

Cedar Falls delays public hearing on crypto mining operation, power plant

Published

on

Cedar Falls delays public hearing on crypto mining operation, power plant

CEDAR FALLS, Iowa (KCRG) – Cedar Falls city officials postponed a public hearing on zoning and code changes needed for a proposed power plant and cryptocurrency mining operation.

The hearing was pushed back to April 22 amid concerns from residents about environmental impacts and utility costs.

Cedar Falls Utility and Simple Mining, the company behind the cryptocurrency operation, say their projects will not negatively impact the public or the environment. Residents at Tuesday night’s meeting showed skepticism about those claims.

People are concerned about noise levels and water and electricity usage. Simple Mining says its crypto mining will use a closed loop water cooling system, which will allow the operation to use very little water. The company also says it can be shut down quickly when energy rates are higher.

Matt Hein, Simple Mining Director of Energy Infrastructure, said the company’s energy usage is a benefit to Cedar Falls.

Advertisement

“Our large consumption of electricity is an economic benefit to the city of Cedar Falls,” Hein said. “We help pay for schools, we help pay for roads.”

People worry high energy usage will push their utility bills up.

Cedar Falls Utility says the power plant was planned for years before the crypto operation became part of the picture.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending