Crypto
What is the strategic bitcoin reserve that Trump is promising and how would it work?
The US election results are monopolizing the debate in the crypto world. Donald Trump’s victory has taken Bitcoin to levels never seen before. In fact, for days now, a single Bitcoin is nearing $100,000, which has investors holding their breath. Other altcoins are joining in this euphoria, breaking new records. This includes Solana, as well as XRP — Ripple’s currency — which has seen triple-digit growth.
The cryptocurrency sector — already euphoric about the election of a pro-crypto president who wants to gut financial regulations — is now awaiting the materialization of the numerous promises that the Republican candidate made during the 2024 campaign.
Experts warn that it remains to be seen whether the tycoon will actually be able to honor his announcements. But, for the moment, the industry’s wishes seem to be fulfilled. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler — who has been skeptical and sometimes hostile to cryptocurrencies over the years — has already announced that he will step down as head of the securities market supervisor on January 20 at noon, just as Trump takes office. Meanwhile, the Republican recently named Scott Bessent as his nominee for the Department of the Treasury.
Bessent — in an interview with Fox Business earlier this year — said that cryptocurrencies “are about freedom and the crypto economy is here to stay. These assets are attracting young people, who haven’t participated in the [stock market].” But one of the promises that most excites the industry and investors is the possibility of creating a strategic reserve of bitcoins in the U.S. Trump mentioned this project back in June, during the Bitcoin 2024 conference held in Nashville, Tennessee. The proposal has deeply resonated with the sector.
What is a strategic bitcoin reserve?
A strategic reserve is a set of external assets that are immediately available and under the control of the monetary authorities. They’re meant to meet the financing needs of the balance of payments, or to intervene in the foreign exchange markets in order to influence the exchange rate, to name just some examples. In this way, a bitcoin reserve would be similar to the gold and foreign currency reserves held by central banks. There are also strategic reserves of basic raw materials, such as oil.
The pioneering cryptocurrencies would be incorporated into the mix of assets that the North American country has on its balance sheet, with the aim of diversifying reserves. However, the project isn’t clearly laid out and there’s still much speculation on the matter, starting with the basic question of which authority would be responsible for managing it. Would it be the Federal Reserve? Or another institution? And the no less important question concerns how to pay for it. Bitcoins could be purchased after selling off other assets — such as gold or bonds — increasing debt, or expanding the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet, an operation that is colloquially known as “printing money.”
This reserve would also include the bitcoins that the U.S. administration has seized to-date: some 208,109, worth almost $20 billion at the current market price. These include the cryptocurrencies confiscated in 2013 from Ross Ulbricht, the founder of Silk Road, a dark web that operated exclusively in bitcoin. Users would traffic drugs and hire hitmen, among other things. During the election campaign, Donald Trump promised to commute Ulbricht’s life sentence upon reaching the White House.
What does the proposal look like?
The most concrete proposal so far is that of pro-crypto Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis, who introduced her Bitcoin Act of 2024 (Boosting Innovation, Technology and Competitiveness through Optimized Investment Nationwide Act) in the Senate. This project provides for the Treasury and the Federal Reserve to buy 200,000 bitcoins each year for a period of five years, until reaching one million units. This would represent about 5% of the total global supply of bitcoins, which is around 21 million. The reserve would subsequently be maintained for a minimum of 20 years. The idea is that this reserve would serve as a hedge against the devaluation of the U.S. dollar, to strengthen national balance sheets and support future debt issues.
In the legislation, the proposed mechanism to purchase the cryptocurrency has two elements: on the one hand, the surplus that the Federal Reserve returns to the Treasury (i.e. the profits of the U.S. central banking system) would be used to buy bitcoin. On the other hand, it proposes that the central banks of each state reassess the gold certificates they hold, to better reflect the value of the metal in the current market. They must then deliver the difference to the Treasury, which will use the funds to buy bitcoin.
Noelle Achenson — author of the Crypto is Macro Now newsletter — explains that the Fed has certificates on its balance sheet that represent the gold held by the Treasury. The total valuation is approximately $10.5 billion. However, this value is based on a legal price that, since 1973, has remained constant at $42 per ounce. If valued at current prices, the stored gold would be worth about $643 billion.
Beyond the federal administration, states are also moving to have their own bitcoin reserves. Mike Cabell — a member of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives — recently introduced a bill for the creation of a strategic bitcoin reserve to allow the state treasury to invest up to 10% of its funds in bitcoin. The aim of this legislation is for the cryptocurrency to serve as a hedge against inflation. However, the details of the proposed regulations are still unknown.
What have other countries done?
El Salvador has been a pioneer in creating a strategic crypto reserve. In fact, the Central American country was the first to adopt bitcoin as legal tender in September of 2021. The government has since acquired up to 5,944 bitcoin, valued at more than $560 million at the current market price, according to the country’s Bitcoin Office. Added to this is the kingdom of Bhutan, which owns 12,218 bitcoins, valued at $1.2 billion, according to data from the firm Arkham Intelligence. The firm details that the fortune of this crypto state comes from bitcoin mining operations (taking advantage of the national orography for the generation of electrical energy) carried out by the country’s investment arm, the state-owned conglomerate Druk Holdings.
Other nations that own the pioneering cryptocurrency have mainly accumulated it through confiscations, as is the case of the United States. But beyond the North American country, other states have been collecting bitcoin in recent years. The United Kingdom, in fact, has an account with 61,245 tokens, worth more than $6 billion.
Experts also point to China as one of the largest holders of this cryptocurrency. In November of 2020, authorities confiscated 194,775 bitcoin from members of the PlusToken Ponzi scheme, a scam operating in the Asian country that promised its victims “constant” double-digit returns. The perpetrators of this scam collected cryptocurrencies worth billions of dollars, which they then used to buy properties and luxury cars for themselves or their relatives. However — according to Arkham Investments — it’s unclear whether the Chinese government still owns these seized bitcoins, or has since sold them.
What do the analysts say?
The experts consulted by EL PAÍS disagree on the possibility of this project being carried out. Luis Garvía — director of the Financial Risk graduate program at the Madrid-based Catholic Institute of Business Administration (ICADE) — is blunt: “It seems absolutely reasonable to me that any government should have a part of its reserves in bitcoin. Diversification is very important,” he emphasizes.
Carlos Salinas — a professor in the master’s degree program in Blockchain and Digital Asset Investment at the IEB — believes that the promise of creating a bitcoin reserve is one of the main drivers of the asset’s surging price. However, he doubts that the U.S. can accumulate such a large quantity of bitcoin, although he doesn’t rule it out entirely. And, if the proposed legislation indeed sees the light of day, other nations — such as Russia, China, Brazil, or India — wouldn’t want to be left out: “At the last highs of bitcoin in 2021, we saw the FOMO, but in this current bullish phase, we’re [dealing] with institutional FOMO. We don’t know how big this can become,” he warns
For his part, Javier Molina — a senior market analyst at eToro — doubts that bitcoin can ever be considered a store of value like gold, nor that there will ever be a large-scale adoption of the currency by governments, at least in the short and medium-term. “While the idea that bitcoin could one day play a role similar to that of gold as a store of value — like ‘digital gold’ — may be interesting, I think we’re still far from seeing a race for digital reserves at the government level,” he opines.
David Tercero-Lucas is a professor of Economics at ICADE. He specializes in cryptoassets and digital currencies. He highlights that, while bitcoin shares certain characteristics with traditional assets — such as gold, for example, given its scarcity and its independence from centralized entities — it lacks other essential characteristics typical of reliable reserve assets. “Gold has a millennia-old history as a store of value; it’s widely-accepted and has industrial uses that reinforce its usefulness. Currencies, such as the dollar, are backed by robust states and financial systems. Bitcoin, on the other hand, is extremely volatile and its value depends more on speculative expectations than on tangible fundamentals,” he details.
Therefore, according to this expert, selling gold to buy this cryptocurrency is risky, especially since its capacity to serve as a strategic reserve in crisis contexts has never been validated in the long-term. He also points out that the idea that this asset cannot be sold for 20 years — one of the requirements included in the Bitcoin Act — doesn’t offer financial resilience in the short-term. In fact, it contradicts the purpose of a strategic reserve, which should be available to stabilize the economy in emergency situations.
Santiago Carbó — a professor of Economics at the University of Valencia — agrees with this analysis. He warns that the proposed U.S. legislation sets a dangerous precedent: “Bitcoin has been anything but a stable value until now.” He trusts in the orthodoxy of the Federal Reserve to prevent this project from being approved, while still recognizing the growing acceptance of this cryptocurrency among investors. He also points to the lack of transparency in the crypto market, its lack of maturity and high levels of risk that make it unreliable as a reserve asset.
The expert consulted by EL PAÍS who’s most wary about the launch of a strategic reserve is Manuel Villegas, a digital asset analyst at Julius Baer. For him, there’s still a lot of noise around the idea. “The market has anticipated a lot and I think it hasn’t yet fully understood that this is [a serious] proposal. There’s a lot of speculation about what may happen. But the Federal Reserve is an independent authority and, in recent months, Jerome Powell hasn’t been very favorable to this issue,” he warns. Moreover, unlike SEC Chair Gary Gensler, the Fed chairman already made it clear at the last Fed meeting that he doesn’t intend to resign and that Trump cannot fire him.
Add to this another factor: market concentration. According to Villegas, buying 200,000 bitcoins a year in a market as illiquid as the current one could drive prices up excessively. And, on the other hand, it could concentrate a large part of the supply of this cryptocurrency in the hands of the U.S.: “It would become one of the largest holders of the asset, with 5% in reserves. [We also must add] the 3% held by MicroStrategy [which already has about $17 billion worth of bitcoin on its balance sheet] plus the holdings of Marathon and BlackRock,” he concludes.
While Bitcoin investors and the industry are rubbing their hands gleefully at the prospect of the pioneering cryptocurrency’s value skyrocketing even further, prediction markets indicate that this project won’t happen: the odds of the U.S. having its own Bitcoin strategic reserve stand at just 30% on Polymarket.
Translated by Avik Jain Chatlani.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition
Crypto
Crypto industry squeezed by falling trading volume, tougher regulations – The Korea Times
Bitcoin prices are displayed at the Bithumb Lounge in Seoul’s Gangnam District, March 4. Yonhap
The domestic cryptocurrency industry is grappling with mounting concerns over a market downturn as trading activity sharply weakens amid the ongoing stock market boom and as financial authorities move to tighten regulations, industry officials said Sunday.
According to data the Bank of Korea submitted to Rep. Cha Gyu-geun of the minor Rebuilding Korea Party, both domestic investors’ crypto holdings and transaction volumes have fallen by more than half over the past year.
The value of digital assets held by investors at the country’s five cryptocurrency exchanges — Upbit, Bithumb, Korbit, Coinone and Gopax — fell to 60.6 trillion won ($41.4 billion) at the end of February from 121.8 trillion won recorded at the end of January last year.
Average daily trading volume also fluctuated sharply during the period. After climbing to 17.1 trillion won in December last year, trading volume plunged to around 4.5 trillion won by the end of February this year.
“The sharp drop in domestic cryptocurrency holdings appears to have been driven by both capital flowing into the strong local stock market and declines in crypto prices,” Hong Sung-wook, an analyst at NH Investment & Securities, said.
At the same time, the industry is bracing for tighter regulations as financial authorities prepare to implement revised rules under the Act on Reporting and Use of Specified Financial Transaction Information in August to strengthen anti-money laundering oversight.
Under the law, financial institutions and virtual asset service providers are required to comply with obligations such as customer identity verification and suspicious transaction reporting to prevent illicit activities, including money laundering and terrorist financing.
Industry officials are particularly concerned about a proposed rule requiring cryptocurrency transactions exceeding 10 million won involving overseas exchanges or private wallets to be automatically classified as suspicious and reported to the Financial Intelligence Unit.
Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA), which represents major domestic crypto exchanges, argued that the strengthened regulations could undermine market activity by placing excessive compliance burdens on the industry.
“Applying a blanket suspicious transaction reporting requirement to all crypto transfers above 10 million won fails to reflect the unique nature of digital assets,” DAXA said in its report. “In the United States, transactions involving overseas crypto exchanges or private wallets are not automatically subject to additional reporting requirements. Instead, reporting obligations arise only when transactions above $2,000 are accompanied by clear signs of suspicious activity.”
The alliance has submitted a comment letter to the Ministry of Government Legislation on behalf of virtual asset service providers, urging authorities to reconsider the proposed amendments amid concerns they could further weaken market activity.
A representation of virtual cryptocurrency bitcoin / Korea Times photo by Shim Hyun-chul
Debate over fairness is also intensifying over the government’s plan to introduce cryptocurrency taxation next year. The change would make cryptocurrency gains subject to a 22 percent tax, despite the removal of tax obligations for general equity investors following the repeal of the financial investment income tax in late 2024.
Park Soo-young of the main opposition People Power Party noted that authorities are currently capable of tracking transactions only at the country’s five won-based cryptocurrency exchanges.
“The policy could accelerate capital outflows to overseas trading platforms such as Binance,” he said.
Oh Moon-sung, an adjunct professor at Kyung Hee University’s Graduate School of Business, argued that many of the reasons cited for abolishing the financial investment income tax, including concerns over weakening market activity and insufficient tax infrastructure, are equally relevant to the digital asset market.
“Applying taxes exclusively to cryptocurrency investments while excluding stock investments conflicts with the constitutional principle of equal taxation,” Oh said.
He added that cryptocurrency taxation should be postponed until critical conditions are in place, such as establishing clear tax guidelines for emerging digital asset transactions and building an integrated reporting system connecting domestic exchanges with the National Tax Service.
Crypto
Lagarde Blocks Euro Stablecoin Push, Calls $300B Market a Stability Risk for ECB Policy
Key Takeaways
- ECB President Lagarde called euro-denominated stablecoins a financial stability risk on May 8, 2026.
- Lagarde mentioned that USDC depegged to $0.877 during SVB’s 2023 collapse, exposing $3.3 billion in Circle reserves.
- The ECB’s Pontes project launches in September 2026 to anchor DLT settlement in central bank money.
Lagarde Warns European Banks That Euro Stablecoins Could Narrow ECB Rate Channel
Lagarde delivered her remarks at the Banco de España Latam Economic Forum in Roda de Bará, Spain. The speech, titled “ Stablecoins and the future of money: separating functions from instruments,” came as the global stablecoin market has grown from under $10 billion six years ago to more than $300 billion today.
“The case for promoting euro-denominated stablecoins is far weaker than it appears,” Lagarde remarked.
The market remains heavily dollar-dominated, with nearly 98% of stablecoins pegged to the U.S. dollar. Tether and Circle control a massive share of that market. The U.S. GENIUS Act, currently advancing through Congress, explicitly frames stablecoin expansion as a tool to cement the dollar’s global dominance and sustain demand for U.S. Treasuries.
Lagarde acknowledged that euro stablecoins operating under the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR), which took effect in 2024, could generate additional demand for euro-area safe assets, compress sovereign yields, and extend the euro’s international reach. She did not dismiss those potential gains outright.
But she argued that two risks make the trade-off unfavorable. The first is financial stability. Stablecoins are private liabilities whose backing can come under sudden pressure during periods of stress. She highlighted that when Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) collapsed in March 2023, Circle disclosed that $3.3 billion of USDC’s reserves were held there. During that window, Lagarde said, USDC briefly traded at $0.877, more than 12 cents below its $1 peg.
“These trade-offs outweigh the short-term gains in financing conditions and international reach that euro-denominated stablecoins might provide,” Lagarde stated during her speech.
The second concern is monetary policy transmission, she explained. In the euro area, banks remain the primary channel through which ECB interest rate decisions reach firms and households. If retail deposits migrate into non-bank stablecoins and return to banks as more expensive wholesale funding, that channel narrows. ECB research published in March 2026 (Working Paper No. 3199) found that large-scale deposit substitution would weaken bank lending and monetary policy pass-through, an effect the paper noted is more pronounced in bank-heavy economies like Europe than in the U.S.
Lagarde’s position puts her at odds with Bundesbank President Joachim Nagel, also an ECB Governing Council member. In a Feb. 16, 2026, keynote at the New Year’s Reception of AmCham Germany, Nagel expressed support for the instruments. “I also see merit in euro-denominated stablecoins, as they can be used for cross-border payments by individuals and firms at low cost,” Nagel explained.
The divergence reflects a broader internal debate within the Eurosystem over how to respond to dollar stablecoin dominance and the risk of what Lagarde called “digital dollarisation.”
Rather than match U.S. stablecoin policy, Lagarde pointed to the Eurosystem’s own infrastructure plans. The Pontes project, launching in September 2026, will link distributed ledger platforms to TARGET, the ECB’s existing settlement system, allowing DLT-based transactions to settle in central bank money. The Appia roadmap, published in March 2026, sets a path to a fully interoperable European tokenized financial ecosystem by 2028.
“Our task is not to replicate instruments developed elsewhere, but to build the foundations and the infrastructure that serve our own objectives, so that we can harness the benefits of innovation without importing the fragilities,” Lagarde said.
European banks and payment firms that have already begun preparing regulated euro stablecoin products under MiCAR may now face added scrutiny as the ECB signals it prefers central bank-anchored solutions over private alternatives.
Crypto
New Alabama law targets cryptocurrency kiosk scams
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (WBRC) – Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed the Cryptocurrency Kiosk Fraud Prevention Act into law this week, putting rules and regulations on cryptocurrency ATMs.
In Hoover, community members have lost more than $800,000 to scammers luring them to crypto kiosks over the last five years. Many of these ATMs are found in places like gas stations or grocery stores.
“A lot of people who are victims of these scams they’re not stupid people. They’re people who are educated and have good jobs, and many times I have lived a very full life. They just fall victim because the scammers know what language to use,” said Capt. Daniel Lowe with the Hoover Police Department.
Under the Cryptocurrency Kiosk Fraud Prevention Act, transactions will be capped, fraud warnings displayed on machines and refund mechanisms set in place for confirmed fraud cases.
“Now that we have some parameters around these kiosks to hopefully prevent some of this fraud, especially the daily limits alone will at least lower the dollar amount that people can put into one of these at one time,” Lowe said.
The law also requires the kiosks to have a customer service line based in the United States. Anyone who violates it can face civil and criminal charges.
“It’s been a really prevalent problem, and we’re glad that our state is taking some steps to help get some parameters on this and hopefully keep our citizens’ money in their pockets because they’ve earned it,” Lowe said.
Police in Hoover do want to remind you that law enforcement would never ask anyone to pay a fine by using cryptocurrency. If someone gets a call asking them to do this, they should hang up and call police.
Get news alerts in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store or subscribe to our email newsletter here.
Copyright 2026 WBRC. All rights reserved.
-
South Dakota3 minutes ago
SD Lottery Powerball, Lotto America winning numbers for May 9, 2026
-
Tennessee9 minutes agoReport suggests Tennessee middle class income grew 18% in 10 years
-
Texas15 minutes agoCruise ship linked to hantavirus outbreak heads to Spain
-
Utah21 minutes agoThree motorcycles crash on Trapper’s Loop in northern Utah
-
Vermont27 minutes ago
VT Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for May 9, 2026
-
Virginia33 minutes agoDing! Ding! Virginia Beach trolley season kicks off May 10
-
Washington39 minutes agoStorm Team4 Forecast: Beautiful Mother’s Day morning with chance of late showers
-
Wisconsin45 minutes ago
Wisconsin Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for May 9, 2026