Connect with us

Crypto

US rise of cryptocurrency and fall of regulation pose ‘profound risks’ – report

Published

on

US rise of cryptocurrency and fall of regulation pose ‘profound risks’ – report

A new report warns of “profound risks” in American politics as cryptocurrency companies increase their political spending and Donald Trump oversees regulatory retreat while promising to create a “crypto strategic reserve”.

The situation “illustrate[s] the profound risks that unchecked corporate political spending presents, particularly within the volatile and often unpredictable cryptocurrency industry”, reads the report, from the Center for Political Accountability (CPA), a non-profit that advocates for corporate political disclosure.

“The aggressive push for deregulation, combined with opaque and unaccountable political contributions, has not only raised red flags among regulators but also eroded investor confidence and public trust in the long-term viability of these companies.”

In the CPA’s definition, cryptocurrency, “often shortened to ‘crypto’, is a monetary technology that emerged in the early 2010s … meant to circumvent traditional central authorities like banks to allow decentralized, peer-to-peer transactions, recorded in heavily encrypted digital ledgers”.

The new report notes that “some public companies active in these fields have begun engaging in substantial political spending at both the national and state level – to the tune of more than $134m during the 2024 election alone”.

Advertisement

After the election, the CPA notes, the crypto companies Kraken and Coinbase were among “a number of … public companies making $1m donations to the Trump Inaugural Fund”. With Trump in power, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has dropped lawsuits against both Kraken, which it formerly alleged to be an “unregistered securities exchange”, and Coinbase.

Such moves followed the departure on inauguration day, 20 January, of Gary Gensler, confirmed as SEC chair under Joe Biden but whom Trump had vowed to remove. Caroline Crenshaw, a commissioner confirmed in Trump’s first term but like Gensler opposed by crypto interests, was set to serve a second four-year term but is now to be replaced.

“Crypto money played such an important role in the election,” Bruce Freed, CPA president, said. “Take a look at some of the candidates who went down where there was heavy crypto spending.

“Take a look at the case of [the progressive representative and crypto skeptic] Katie Porter in the [US Senate] primary in California. Adam Schiff [a more crypto-friendly Democrat] benefited from that. You had the heavy crypto spending against Sherrod Brown [an incumbent Democrat, defeated in Ohio by the crypto-friendly Republican Bernie Moreno], because he was chair of the Senate banking committee [and a crypto skeptic].

“And then you take a look at the SEC, and you take a look at oversight and regulation of crypto, and some of the enforcement actions that were brought under Gary Gensler against crypto now have been dropped. So you can see a very significant impact in a short period of time, of crypto money.”

Advertisement

Ben Schaffzin, CPA assistant director of research and primary report author, said crypto companies “far and away blew every other industry out the water in terms of outside spending” in 2024. “We haven’t seen something like that before … and now we’re seeing the Trump administration move very quickly around their idea of this ‘crypto strategic reserve’,” Schaffzin said.

This month, Trump, who has launched his own crypto ventures, wrote on his social media platform that using taxpayer money to create “a US Crypto Reserve” would “elevate this critical industry after years of corrupt attacks by the Biden administration”, amid a push to “make sure the US is the Crypto Capital of the World”.

On Thursday, Trump signed an executive order to establish the reserve. On Friday, he held a White House “cryptocurrency summit”, followed by a reception hosted by Coinbase.

Schaffzin and fellow report author Jeanne Hanna, CPA vice-president of research, note Trump’s appointment of David Sacks, a South African entrepreneur and crypto investor, as “crypto czar”.

Sacks “has reportedly divested his personal crypto holdings”, the authors write, but “it remains to be seen if [he] will divest from his investment firm as well, of which he remains a partner and [which] stands to profit from the coins mentioned in the executive order if purchased in large numbers by the US government.

Advertisement
skip past newsletter promotion

“This specter of impropriety does nothing to assuage concerns about the pay-to-play nature of cryptocurrency.”

Asked whether the outlook on crypto would have been less concerning had Kamala Harris become president, Hanna said: “This spending was incredibly bipartisan … [but] like a lot of things over the last six weeks [since Trump took power], I think the pace of what’s unfolded in the crypto industry has been accelerated by some of the executive appointments Trump has made in this space. But I think maybe the overall regulatory environment through Congress possibly wouldn’t have been dramatically different under Harris compared to Trump.”

Advertisement

Freed said: “With Trump, you have a much more transactional approach to politics and policymaking, and I think that’s very, very significant on [crypto]. When you see the money that poured in, for instance, against Sherrod Brown, you see basically crypto wanting to free itself from any oversight and regulation.

“There clearly was tremendous interest in what happens at the SEC … crypto clearly did not want to be encumbered in any way by oversight or regulation.”

To illustrate the dangers of crypto in politics, the CPA report cites recent events in Argentina, where Javier Milei – like Trump, a rightwing populist president – promoted “a scam coin called $Libra that lost all of its value, nearly $4.6bn in mere hours.

“While President Milei quickly deleted his endorsement of the token after the fact, his political opposition has filed over 100 fraud complaints with the government, prompting a judge to open an investigation” amid calls for Milei to be impeached.

“This scandal has only served to further highlight the systemic risks surrounding crypto,” the CPA authors write.

Advertisement

Schaffzin said Argentina should stand as a warning to Trump’s administration, adding: “Preaching this stuff from the top, from an executive that really doesn’t understand the mechanisms of crypto and how risky it is to ordinary consumers who don’t know the pitfalls in this product, is extremely dangerous.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Crypto

Better Cryptocurrency to Buy With $5,000 and Hold Forever: XRP vs. Ethereum | The Motley Fool

Published

on

Better Cryptocurrency to Buy With ,000 and Hold Forever: XRP vs. Ethereum | The Motley Fool

Both Ethereum (ETH 6.03%) and XRP (XRP 3.76%) are tried-and-tested blockchains which have survived (and sometimes thrived) for years on end. That means they’re both sturdy enough to be candidates for a big investment, like $5,000, and for holding over the very long term, or even forever.

So which of these two leading coins is the better option for a forever hold?

Image source: Getty Images.

Ethereum has more ways to grow

Forever is a long time, especially for an investment in an emerging sector like crypto. Therefore, an asset’s optionality regarding where it can derive growth is a key factor, as today’s growth drivers might peter out and new ones are likely to emerge.

On that front, Ethereum has plenty of options. It already hosts a large decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem worth more than $53 billion today, powered by a massive stablecoin base of $159 billion. That existing base of capital is a strategic asset because it gives developers and financial institutions a reason to build new products right where liquidity already lives. It also gives investors exposure to many possible growth lanes at once, from the onboarding of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) to the development of new settlement rails for payments between AI agents.

Advertisement
Ethereum Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-6.03%) $-123.58

Current Price

$1924.97

Another advantage is that Ethereum has a track record of consistently shipping large protocol upgrades. The Pectra upgrade, for example, landed on the mainnet in May 2025, followed by the Fusaka upgrade in December. Two similarly large feature packages are expected for 2026, and they should help to build the chain’s ability to scale up without spiking transaction costs.

If you plan to hold an asset indefinitely, this network’s culture of iterative improvement reduces the risk that its technical capabilities will become irrelevant as emerging opportunities for growth arise. Its habit of attracting and retaining substantial capital also helps prevent that outcome.

XRP has to keep winning specific fights over time

XRP is not a bad crypto asset by any means, but its long-term burden is its far narrower positioning than Ethereum.

Ripple, the coin’s issuer, built the XRP Ledger (XRPL) ecosystem as a toolkit of financial technologies to support specific workflows in institutional finance, especially cross-border payments and money transfers, and, more recently, the management of tokenized asset capital. The coin’s value is thus derived from the utility of its ledger.

Advertisement

That focus could pay off if the financial companies the chain targets like what it’s offering, but it also concentrates risk. Financial institutions move cautiously, and winning them over is a slow, grinding process of catering to their needs and building strong relationships. Their technology adoption process can stall for years, even when the product works, and decision-makers broadly want to adopt the new tech.

To Ripple’s credit, the XRP Ledger includes plenty of features that match institutional requirements and seek to minimize their potential pain points. The network’s authorized trust lines, for instance, let tokenized asset issuers whitelist who can hold their issued tokens, which is a feature that supports regulatory constraints around who can legally custody an asset. Similarly, the ledger supports freezing tokens when suspicious activity appears, which is a control that traditional finance teams tend to expect in regulated asset workflows.

XRP Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-3.76%) $-0.05

Current Price

$1.35

Advertisement

But holding a coin forever is unforgiving of sustained competitive pressure, which XRP doubtlessly faces. Its competitors include fintech companies and other cryptocurrencies, not to mention the internal tech development capabilities of many of its target users in big banks. So it’ll need to continuously one up the other players in its space if it’s going to grow over the long term, and it’s hard to believe that it’ll win every round that counts.

The verdict

The decision here is about resilience and resources.

Advertisement

Ethereum’s “grizzled veteran” reputation today stems from surviving numerous shifts in user demand patterns while maintaining a large on-chain capital pool and growing it all the while. Its success or failure in any given crypto market segment is not guaranteed, nor was it in the past, but its constant evolution has ensured that failures are not fatal, and also that missed opportunities aren’t very damaging overall.

XRP, on the other hand, is only just starting to scale up its on-chain capital base; it has only $418 million in stablecoins. Furthermore, while it has succeeded in attracting some financial institutions to its chain, the truth is that its growth trajectory has not yet been seriously tested, and is still finding an appropriate product-market fit. Its real competitive challenges have only just begun.

So if you want a coin to buy with $5,000 and hold forever, pick the asset that can win without needing to be perfect: Ethereum. XRP is still a decent long-term hold, assuming it’s part of a diversified crypto portfolio, but it’s riskier.

Continue Reading

Crypto

Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban

Published

on

Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban

Lawmakers Consider Crypto ATM Ban as Scam Losses Rise — Including in Central Minnesota

Minnesota lawmakers are considering banning cryptocurrency kiosks as scam losses continue to rise across the state—including in Central Minnesota.

There are currently about 350 crypto kiosks operating statewide, located in places like gas stations, convenience stores, and grocery stores. These machines allow users to deposit cash and convert it into cryptocurrency, which can then be sent electronically.

Law enforcement officials say scammers are increasingly directing victims to use these kiosks because once the money is sent, it is extremely difficult—if not impossible—to recover.

Police say scams often begin with a phone call, text, or online message. In many cases, scammers pose as government officials, tech support workers, or even romantic partners. Victims are eventually told to withdraw cash and deposit it into a crypto kiosk to “protect” their money or resolve a supposed emergency.

Central Minnesota has seen similar cases. Because St. Cloud serves as a regional hub for shopping and services, crypto kiosks are available locally, giving scammers access points to target area residents.

Advertisement

Some say kiosks also serve legitimate users

Despite the concerns, crypto kiosks do offer legitimate benefits. They allow people to purchase cryptocurrency quickly using cash, without needing a traditional bank account, credit card, or online exchange. Supporters say this can make cryptocurrency more accessible, especially for people who prefer cash transactions or have limited access to banking services.

Crypto kiosks can also be used to send money quickly, including international transfers, without relying on traditional wire services. Some users view them as a convenient way to invest in cryptocurrency or move money electronically without going through a bank.

Companies that operate the machines say the vast majority of transactions are legitimate and that kiosks include warnings about scams. They argue the focus should be on stopping scammers, not banning the machines entirely.

Lawmakers weighing next steps

Supporters of the proposed ban say removing the kiosks could help prevent fraud and protect vulnerable residents, particularly older adults. Law enforcement officials told lawmakers that crypto kiosk scams have resulted in significant financial losses statewide.

Minnesota passed regulations in 2024 requiring some safeguards, including limits on deposits for new users and refund requirements in certain fraud cases. But officials say scammers have continued to adapt.

Advertisement

The bill remains under consideration at the Capitol.

In the meantime, authorities urge Central Minnesota residents to be cautious. Officials emphasize that legitimate government agencies, law enforcement, and businesses will never ask someone to deposit cash into a cryptocurrency kiosk.

As cryptocurrency becomes more common, lawmakers are now weighing whether the risks to consumers outweigh the convenience and accessibility these machines provide.

10 (More) Hilariously Bad Google Reviews of Central MN Landmarks

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud: Bizman loses Rs 2.6 cr to crypto, investment fraud | Hyderabad News – The Times of India

Published

on

Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud: Bizman loses Rs 2.6 cr to crypto, investment fraud | Hyderabad News – The Times of India

Hyderabad: A 69-year-old businessman from Somajiguda lost 2.65 crore allegedly in a cryptocurrency and stock investment fraud. Based on his complaint, Hyderabad Cyber Crime police have registered a case.The complainant was first contacted by a fraudster posing as Ramya Krishnan on Aug 30, 2025 through Facebook. She persuaded the victim to invest in a cryptocurrency and stock trading platform, Polyus Finance PFP Gold, hosted at the domain pfpgoldfx.vip, promising high returns to finance his proposed resort and apparel ventures.Fraudsters provided the victim a contact number for daily communication and sent screenshots showing notional profits credited in his wallet in USDT cryptocurrency. To build trust, the fraudster even allowed the victim a token withdrawal of 4,300 on Sept 12, 2025.Encouraged, the victim transferred over 2.65 crore in 10 transactions between Sept 10 and Dec 39, 2025 to various current accounts provided by the accused.When he attempted to withdraw his ‘earnings’, the accused demanded an additional 15% conversion commission. After he refused, the website became inaccessible and calls to the fraudsters went unanswered.Realising that he was duped, the victim filed an online report on the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (NCRP) before approaching the Cyber Crime police on Feb 25.Based on his complaint, a case was registered under Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act and Sections 111(2)(b) (Organised crime), 318(4) (Cheating), 319(2) (Cheating by personation), 336(3) (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 338 (Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.) and 340(2) (Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita on Wednesday. Police were analysing financial transactions to identify and arrest the accused.

Continue Reading

Trending