Connect with us

Business

Texas Observer Reverses Plan to Shut Down and Lay Off Its Staff

Published

on

Texas Observer Reverses Plan to Shut Down and Lay Off Its Staff

The board of the nonprofit proprietor of The Texas Observer voted on Wednesday to rescind plans to put off the workers of the small journal, a bastion of liberal opinion and investigative journalism in a crimson state, the board president mentioned.

The announcement got here sooner or later after The Observer reported that the Texas Democracy Basis, the nonprofit writer of the journal and web site, had informed workers this week that it deliberate to cease publication on Friday after 68 years.

The deliberate shutdown prompted former and present workers members to combat the choice and to attempt to avert layoffs with a last-minute on-line fund-raising marketing campaign. They’ve raised greater than $290,000 since Monday.

“At present, upon receiving vital monetary pledges over the previous few days, The Texas Observer Board gathered to vote to rethink earlier board actions,” the board president, Laura Hernandez Holmes, mentioned in an announcement on Wednesday.

“The vote to rescind layoffs was unanimous, and the board is keen to maneuver the publication to its subsequent section,” Ms. Hernandez Holmes mentioned. “I need to categorical my heartfelt thanks and gratitude to those that donated to and expressed assist for The Texas Observer, in addition to gratitude to The Observer’s workers for stepping up and dealing onerous to maintain the publication alive.”

Advertisement

Gabriel Arana, the editor in chief, known as the choice to rescind layoffs “great information.”

The workers of 16 had spent the week believing that they might be let go after studying of the board’s vote to enact cuts on Sunday from an article in The Texas Tribune, Mr. Arana mentioned.

“Ecstatic,” he mentioned, describing the response among the many workers to the board’s reversal. “Individuals are very enthusiastic about that and about persevering with to maneuver ahead.”

The Texas Observer is probably greatest referred to as the house of Molly Ivins, the liberal columnist who developed her voice as a workers member there within the Nineteen Seventies. Ms. Ivins, who died in 2007, at age 62, as soon as wrote that The Observer was a spot the place “you’ll be able to inform the reality with out the bark on it, snigger at anybody who’s ridiculous, and go after the unhealthy guys with all of the vitality you might have, so long as you get the information proper.”

It additionally has a historical past of inside strife and, in line with that custom, Mr. Arana, had implored readers in an article on Tuesday to present cash below the headline “Save The Texas Observer!”

Advertisement

Earlier this week, Ms. Hernandez Holmes had delay questions in regards to the board’s determination to put off workers. In her assertion on Wednesday, she mentioned that, “My intent in voting for layoffs and hiatus was by no means about closing down the publication.”

“The actions I took as board president had been meant to permit house for The Observer to be reconstituted, and reimagined in a extra sustainable type,” she mentioned.

Ms. Hernandez Holmes had informed The Tribune earlier this week that assaults on her and the board “type of simply sucked all of the vitality and focus away from sustaining the monetary well being of the org within the final couple of months.”

“I don’t know if it’s as a result of I’m a younger girl of colour speaking to males,” she informed The Tribune. “I typically surprise if my requests and directives would have been higher obtained coming from a person. I used to be not revered because the board president by senior workers.”

Mr. Arana and a former workers member, James Canup, mentioned that Ms. Hernandez Holmes had introduced a whole shutdown with layoffs throughout a video name with the workers on Monday. Mr. Canup, who was managing director, mentioned he resigned in protest after the decision.

Advertisement

The Observer has about 4,000 subscribers to the print journal, which publishes six instances a yr, along with its on-line readers, however survives totally on donations and grants, in accordance with Robert R. Frump, a former board member who had been working enterprise operations as a particular adviser. He, too, resigned in protest.

Mr. Frump mentioned The Observer had struggled to draw youthful progressive donors and that its core supporters had been “getting older out and never as lively and never as beneficiant as they as soon as had been.”

Nonetheless, he mentioned that the board’s authentic determination seemed to be about greater than funds.

“I feel the board is simply drained,” Mr. Frump mentioned. “They’ve run via a lot of these controversies a number of years in the past. They’d a blowup the place 70 p.c of the workers left. They’re simply uninterested in one more battle.”

Below the founding editor, Ronnie Dugger, the publication, then a weekly newspaper, proclaimed its independence in its first subject on Dec. 13, 1954. “We’ll serve no group or occasion however will hew onerous to the reality as we discover it and the fitting as we see it,” it mentioned.

Advertisement

Its writers have lengthy prided themselves on overlaying tales about political corruption, company affect and racial and financial injustice.

Ms. Ivins as soon as wrote that essentially the most placing factor about The Texas Observer was its journalistic excellence.

“The second most placing factor about this small journal is what a frayed shoestring it operates on,” she wrote in “Fifty Years of the Texas Observer,” a set of its journalism, revealed in 2004. “The Observer has simply by no means had any cash. It’s the journalistic equal of the loaves and fishes.”

In 2001, she and Louis Dubose donated proceeds from their guide, “Shrub: The Brief however Comfortable Political Lifetime of George W. Bush,” to assist pay workers salaries.

The shutdown drama got here as different media shops, together with NPR, Vox Media, CNN and The Washington Publish, have introduced workers cuts in latest months.

Advertisement

Mr. Canup mentioned it was a disgrace that The Observer didn’t have extra readers. “The phrases are highly effective and should be influential.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Business

Fast food chains launch 'value menu' war after cost complaints. Will it last?

Published

on

Fast food chains launch 'value menu' war after cost complaints. Will it last?

Millions of American families are hitting the road to start summer vacation, and ordering food on the run tends to be par for the course. It couldn’t come at a better time. Fast food joints are in the midst of a budget-meal war, offering promotions to lure customers back to their restaurants despite inflation woes and a minimum-wage increase in California and other states.

Starting June 25, McDonald’s will offer a month-long deal featuring a combo meal —either a McChicken, a McDouble or four-piece chicken nuggets, small fries and a small drink — for $5.

After McDonald’s announcement last month, other fast food restaurants followed suit. Wendy’s announced its $3 limited-time breakfast combo meal and Burger King trumpeted that it planned to bring back its $5 Your Way Meal.

In addition, fast food mobile apps continue to offer deep discounts.

App relief

Earlier this week, a Big Mac with medium fries and medium drink cost $11.79 before tax at a McDonald’s in Santa Ana. That same meal ordered via a mobile app for pickup at the same location cost $6.50 before tax, a savings of $5.29.

Advertisement

But the prices and deals tend to vary depending on the user.

Diners have taken to complaining on Reddit about the McDonald’s mobile app. Some say the deals decrease with use. Others say their friends or partners were getting a better deal on the app than they were getting. A few mentioned that they could find better deals by just walking in and ordering at their local McDonald’s.

The plethora of promotional deals come after diners blasted fast food companies on social media earlier this year for rising prices.

In response, Joe Erlinger, president of McDonald’s USA, said in an open letter last month that the average price of McDonald’s menu items is up an estimated 40% since 2019.

The McDonald’s restaurant logo and golden arch is lit up in Chicago. McDonald’s plans to introduce a $5 meal deal in the U.S. in June 2024 to counter slowing sales and customers’ frustration with high prices.

Advertisement

(Jeff Roberson / Associated Press)

“Recently, we have seen viral social posts and poorly sourced reports that McDonald’s has raised prices significantly beyond inflationary rates. This is inaccurate,” Erlinger wrote.

“The average price of a Big Mac in the U.S. was $4.39 in 2019,” he said. “Despite a global pandemic and historic rises in supply chain costs, wages and other inflationary pressures in the years that followed, the average cost is now $5.29. That’s an increase of 21% (not 100%),” as unsubstantiated claims allege on social media.

Quick-service restaurants said the increases were in response to rising inflation and labor costs — partly due to hikes in minimum wage not just in California but throughout the country.

Advertisement

It’s true that quick-service restaurants such as McDonalds have had to contend with increased costs, but they are by no means hurting, said Shubhranshu Singh, an associate professor at Johns Hopkins University who specializes in quick-service marketing.

“They are not struggling,” Singh said. “Inflation is going up. Wage rates are going up. But profit for McDonald’s is also going up.”

Global comparable sales for McDonald’s grew nearly 2% in the first quarter of the year, according to the latest statistics made available by the company. The fast-food giant described this profit increase as having “benefited from average check growth driven by strategic menu price increases.”

Price-weary diners have taken notice and become fed up with the price hikes, choosing to eat less fast food and protesting on social media that their go-to budget meals were no longer wallet-friendly, Singh said.

Several diners took aim at McDonald’s, griping on TikTok about the company charging more for food that’s supposed to be affordable.

Advertisement

“This is $3 worth of food,” said a customer who held up a hash brown. “Something doesn’t seem right here.”

“McDonald’s has gotten too cocky,” said another customer. “Y’all not supposed to be expensive.”

One diner called it “absurd” that she’d paid $4.59 for a medium order of french fries.

And then there was the uproar over a McDonald’s location in Connecticut charging $18 for a Big Mac combo meal. The photo sparked a nationwide debate on soaring fast-food prices.

Making choices

Most McDonald’s in the United States are independently franchised, so prices vary depending on where one visits.

Advertisement

Increased fast food prices ultimately led to slower-than-expected sales at various quick-service restaurants, such as McDonald’s, Starbucks and Pizza Hut.

“Consumers are always making choices,” said restaurant analyst Sara Senatore at Bank of America. “When the value proposition starts to diminish, consumers will make other choices.”

Up until fairly recently, consumers were willing to pay more for quick-service food. When fast food prices started to soar in 2022, consumers just went along because prices everywhere had surged due to inflation, Senatore said.

But now inflation has lessened. Grocery prices have fallen and budget-conscious consumers may no longer see fast food as the clear-cut affordable choice, she said.

Enter the value meals.

Advertisement
People carrying red and yellow flags rally outside Los Angeles City Hall.

Fast food workers rally in favor of a proposed minimum wage increase outside Los Angeles City Hall in 2022. The approved increase went into effect on April 1 and was considered a victory for organized labor.

(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times)

Budget meals aren’t new. In the 1980s, McDonald’s, Wendy’s and Burger King engaged in a series of advertising campaigns known as the Burger Wars competing for customers in the then-flourishing fast food market.

“The hope is that the consumer will go there and maybe buy something additional to the value meal and then want to return even when there is no deal,” Singh said.

But the promotions, analysts warned, can’t last forever.

Advertisement

“It’s not sustainable,” Singh said. “I don’t expect any of these deals to stay.”

Continue Reading

Business

Dominic Ng: Philanthropist banker, inclusion practitioner

Published

on

Dominic Ng: Philanthropist banker, inclusion practitioner

The year 2023 was especially cruel to regional banks in California. Repeated interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve exposed the poor bets and hubris of regional highfliers like Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic. Those banks capsized, which sparked bank runs, which wiped shareholders out.

One regional bank, however, smoothly sailed on: East West Bank, helmed for more than 30 years by Dominic Ng, who champions the durable power of steady growth. “We’re prudent and cautious, but very entrepreneurial,” he said from his office at East West headquarters in Pasadena. “The way you win in banking is not through shortcuts. It’s a long game.”

‘His leadership has transformed the bank, transformed philanthropy and what business leadership looks like in L.A.’

— Elise Buik, United Way of Greater Los Angeles’ chief executive

Advertisement

The result has been accolades: No. 1 best-performing bank in its size category last year from S&P Global Market Intelligence and No. 1 performing bank in 2023 by trade publication Bank Director. The diversity of its board of directors — Latino, Asian, Black, female and LGBTQ+ all represented — has also won acclaim.

Steady profits enabled East West to become one of Los Angeles’ top civic benefactors. Ng has been especially active with the United Way of Greater Los Angeles for more than 25 years and is credited with championing a strategic change in direction to more effectively serve the city’s desperately poor, while persuading more of the city’s richest residents to pitch in.

Discover the changemakers who are shaping every cultural corner of Los Angeles. This week we bring you The Money, a collection of bankers, political bundlers, philanthropists and others whose deep pockets give them their juice. Come back each Sunday for another installment.

Advertisement

“His leadership has transformed the bank, transformed philanthropy and what business leadership looks like in L.A.,” said Elise Buik, the United Way chapter’s chief executive.

Born to Chinese parents in Hong Kong in 1959, the youngest of six children, Ng has been chief executive of East West Bank since 1992 and expanded on the bank’s original mission of financing Chinese immigrants who in the 1970s found it difficult to qualify for loans through the usual channels. It’s now the largest publicly traded independent bank based in Southern California, serving an economically and ethnically diverse clientele. On the world stage, Ng serves as co-chair of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Business Advisory Council.

Ng, 65, worries about the future of philanthropy in Los Angeles. He longs for the “good old days” when business chiefs didn’t think twice about pitching in to help the city’s less fortunate.

Dominic Ng

“Today, the pressure is on for [immediate] return to shareholders,” and people running companies have to respond to shareholders who seem to “care less every year” about civic responsibility.

More young, monied tech and finance hotshots would do well to take some cues from business leaders like Ng.

Advertisement

More from L.A. Influential

Continue Reading

Business

Mark Suster: The face of L.A. venture capital

Published

on

Mark Suster: The face of L.A. venture capital

Mark Suster, photographed at the Los Angeles Times in El Segundo on Sept. 8.

Cancer-fighting robots. AI-powered baby monitors. The future of American shipbuilding.

These are the kinds of startup ideas that get Mark Suster out of bed in the morning, into his Tesla, and down to the Santa Monica offices of Upfront, the venture capital firm he joined 16 years ago.

“There’s that old saying — the future is already here, it’s just unevenly distributed,” Suster said. “My job lets me see where the world’s going five years before the general population.”

Advertisement
L.A. Influential

Discover the changemakers who are shaping every cultural corner of Los Angeles. This week we bring you The Money, a collection of bankers, political bundlers, philanthropists and others whose deep pockets give them their juice. Come back each Sunday for another installment.

But Suster, 56, didn’t become the face of the L.A. venture capital scene thanks to his day-to-day investing. He got there by throwing a party called the Upfront Summit.

Every year, Suster’s splashy tech conference takes over an iconic L.A. location. One year, it’s at the Rose Bowl. Another year, it’s at a retreat center high in the Santa Monica Mountains. There are zip lines, hot air balloons, and, among the talks with tech founders about software and product development, fireside chats with celebrities, politicians and authors (Lady Gaga, Katy Perry and Novak Djokovic graced the stage this year).

The razzle-dazzle is part of the draw, and Suster clearly relishes his role as emcee (“I was a theater kid — I still love going to the theater,” he said.)

Advertisement

‘My job lets me see where the world’s going five years before the general population.’

— Mark Suster

But the real appeal comes down to cash. Suster’s strategic move was to invite not just venture capital investors, but the people who invest in venture capital investors. Called limited partners, these are the managers of pensions, sovereign wealth funds and other giant pools of money that want to tap into the tech market. By making sure they’re on the guest list, Suster has made the summit one of the easiest places in America for fellow venture capitalists to raise a new fund.

Mark Suster

The summit loses Upfront money. When Suster started it in 2012, it cost around $300,000. In 2022, costs hit $2.3 million, Suster said, with a handful of sponsors chipping in to cut the losses. But throwing the premiere professional party in California comes with intangible benefits, like bringing in deals that would otherwise leave out Upfront and other L.A. funds and founders.

Advertisement

The 2024 party was a little scaled back, now that higher interest rates have throttled the fire hose of money that went into venture capital during the last decade. But Suster says that he welcomes the less frothy environment. “I’m having a lot more fun now,” he said, investing in founders “looking to build real businesses.”

More from L.A. Influential

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending