Business
Ships at L.A.’s ports face a fuel shock that’s shaking the economy
The massive ships that glide through the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach are facing extreme fuel costs as oil prices rise, often paying millions of dollars more to top off their titanic tanks.
The cost of filling up with shipping fuel in L.A. County is close to 20% higher than at other major ports in the U.S. and worldwide. The rates at the ports in Los Angeles and Long Beach also have risen by more than at other ports since the war in Iran began.
With some ships requiring the equivalent of millions of gallons of fuel after they drop off and pick up cargo, the extra costs add up. Shipping companies are taking steps to reduce fuel consumption and avoid expensive routes, but much of that extra cost eventually will show up in the prices of the many products transported in the hundreds of thousands of containers that pass through the ports every month.
“If someone asks you to ship something, you’re still going to do it, you’re just going to quote them a higher price,” said Mike Jacob, president of the Pacific Merchant Shipping Assn. “Higher supply chain costs ultimately have to be paid by somebody.”
The price of gas for automobiles has jumped more than 50%, making everyone’s commute more costly. Truckers are struggling with sky-high diesel prices and higher aviation fuel prices have lifted airfares and even led to the closure of Spirit Airlines.
Higher shipping fuel costs also are expected to continue contributing to inflation, even if there were an immediate resolution to the conflict with Iran.
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz since late February has blocked a large portion of the global oil supply from flowing freely, and uncertainty surrounding the conflict has kept oil prices volatile. A fragile ceasefire continues despite violence in the Strait in recent days.
Even if there were an immediate end to the Iran war, higher shipping fuel costs are expected to continue contributing to inflation. Above, an oil pumpjack in Santa Fe Springs on May 4, 2026.
(Kyle Grillot / Bloomberg )
As with other types of fuel in the state, taxes, fees and environmental restrictions can add to the cost of fuel for ships. California also gets squeezed more than other states by supply disruptions because it relies on oil delivered from other states and countries.
Less than a week ago, the last oil tanker to pass through the Strait of Hormuz before war broke out arrived at the Port of Long Beach and delivered 2 million barrels of crude oil to the Marathon Petroleum terminal. With no more ships arriving from the Persian Gulf, California will miss out on an average of 200,000 barrels of oil per day from that area.
California relies on the Middle East for 30% of its crude oil, said Port of Los Angeles Executive Director Gene Seroka, including oil that passes through the Strait of Hormuz.
“They’re evaluating all possibilities, including trying to be more fuel efficient and raising prices,” he said of major shippers,” Seroka said. “They may pass the costs to the American importer and exporter and ultimately to their customers, whether it be American consumers, factories or others who buy and sell these products.”
For container ships, fuel now costs about 25% of the total price of a voyage from Asia to Los Angeles, Seroka said.
Data show that fuel used by ships is more expensive in California, as is gasoline and jet fuel. The average price of very low-sulfur fuel oil has risen 70% to $925 per metric ton at the world’s top ports since the war started. The price at the Long Beach and Los Angeles ports has jumped almost 88% to $1,080.
“Fuel is our No. 1 expense for operating a ship,” Jacob said. “There are some things we can do to mitigate it, but those fuel prices end up being reflected in the rates.”
When fuel is expensive, cargo ships often run slower to burn it more efficiently, he said. And major shipping companies already have implemented fuel surcharges to cover higher costs.
For container ships, fuel now costs about 25% of the total price of a voyage from Asia to Los Angeles, Port of L.A. Executive Director Gene Seroka said. Above, a portion of the port May 5, 2026.
(William Liang / For The Times)
Amazon announced a 3.5% fuel and logistics surcharge last month and the U.S. Postal Service is charging an 8% fee on certain packages, its first fuel surcharge ever. Hapag-Lloyd, a German marine shipping company, reported that its fuel costs have gone up by $50 million a week.
Maersk, a shipping company based in Denmark, implemented an emergency bunker surcharge in late March, citing a challenging fuel market.
“We have undertaken significant redistribution of fuels to offset shortages in the Middle East, and are securing alternative sources from different locations and suppliers,” the company said.
The extra charges won’t cover the sustained higher costs immediately, so shipping companies say their profits will be hit. Matson, a shipping company with offices in Concord, Calif., addressed the spike in fuel prices in its investor call earlier this week. The company specializes in shipping to Hawaii and is a member of the Pacific Merchant Shipping Assn.
“We expect fuel price volatility to impact our near-term earnings due to a timing lag between when we incur fuel costs and when we can fully recover these costs through our fuel surcharge,” Matson Chief Executive Matt Cox said on Monday’s call.
Despite the increased costs, activity has not drastically slowed at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, which together handle more than $600 billion in cargo per year. The Port of Long Beach handled 774,935 containers in March, up more than 6,000 from February. Activity at the Port of Los Angeles was down 3% year over year in March.
A driver checks out his cargo container at the Port of Los Angeles in Wilmington on March 4, 2026.
(Genaro Molina / Los Angeles Times)
Operations at the Port of Long Beach aren’t totally spared from the impacts of the global oil shortage, however, Chief Executive Noel Hacegaba said.
“Fuel supplies are tightening and congestion is up at fueling hubs,” Hacegaba said. “Shippers are adjusting how they move cargo to manage costs and avoid congestion.”
Business
Sony Pictures invests $100 million in virtual reality venue Cosm
Sony Pictures will invest $100 million and take a minority stake in virtual reality venue operator Cosm, as the studio continues to build a business in communal experiences.
As part of the investment, Sony Pictures Chief Executive Ravi Ahuja will also join Cosm’s board of directors, the studio said Wednesday. The size of Sony’s minority stake was not disclosed.
The El Segundo-based Cosm currently operates three venues — one at Hollywood Park in Inglewood, and the others in Dallas and Atlanta. The company plans to open additional venues in Detroit and Cleveland.
Cosm bills itself as a “shared reality venue,” and its facilities center around a massive, wraparound screen that is intended to envelop viewers with additional digital effects. The company has largely focused on sports, though it has also shown Cirque du Soleil shows and done several collaborations with Warner Bros., including recent screenings of 2001’s “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone” in honor of the film’s 25th anniversary.
“Cosm sits at the intersection of several trends shaping the future of entertainment,” Ahuja said in a statement. “We’ve followed Cosm since before launch and have been impressed with the quality of the experience and the enthusiasm it’s generating with audiences.”
The investment is Sony’s latest venture into experiential entertainment. In 2024, the Culver City-based studio acquired dine-in theater chain Alamo Drafthouse Cinema.
Business
Los Angeles tries again to phase out urban oil production
The Los Angeles City Council on Tuesday unanimously advanced an ordinance to halt new oil and gas drilling and phase out all existing production over the next 20 years. L.A. is home to more than 2,000 active oil wells.
The measure revives a similar ban passed in 2022, which was struck down by a judge following legal challenges from the oil and gas industry.
It must pass a second vote before final adoption later this summer, and would make L.A. the largest city in the United States to phase out existing oil wells.
“Today, Los Angeles is making a decision that aligns with our need to turn the page on urban oil drilling,” Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky said during Tuesday’s council meeting. “The absence of an enforceable oil ordinance has had real consequences for our communities.”
The ban in 2022 was seen as a historic move for a region built on the petroleum industry.
But in 2024, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge invalidated the law, ruling that the state, not the city, has jurisdiction over petroleum production. The legal challenge was brought by oil companies including Warren Resources, which operates a large oil field in Wilmington. Much of the field is beneath the city of Long Beach, but it also extends under Los Angeles.
Shortly after that, state legislators advanced Assembly Bill 3233, which reaffirmed city and county authority to regulate oil and gas activity. It was largely seen as the missing piece that made the original ordinance vulnerable.
“It’s now unequivocal that cities have the authority to regulate, limit and prohibit oil and gas operations within our jurisdiction,” Yaroslavsky said.
The new ordinance, written by the Department of City Planning, prohibits new oil and gas extraction, including drilling, redrilling or deepening existing oil wells for the purposes of production. It also designates all existing and active idle wells as “nonconforming uses,” meaning they may only operate during the phaseout period and are no longer compliant with current zoning.
Warren Resources, which led the lawsuit against the previous ban, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company previously argued that the 2022 ban was rushed and would lead to more oil imports to the area, causing increased emissions from tankers and trucks and other environmental consequences.
Many wells in the city operate near schools, homes and parks. Most are concentrated in low-income areas and communities of color, such as Wilmington and the harbor district, West L.A. and South L.A., where residents have long reported respiratory issues, headaches, throat irritation and other health problems. Studies have found oil wells can emit carcinogens and are linked to adverse health effects.
“This ordinance is such an important step toward giving every frontline community in Los Angeles access to clean air,” Silvia Esparza, a South L.A. resident and member of environmental justice group Stand-L.A., said in a news conference ahead of Tuesday’s vote.
Ashley Hernandez, a Wilmington resident and organizer with the nonprofit Communities for a Better Environment, said bloody noses and noxious fumes were a regular part of life in the neighborhood growing up.
She noted that in addition to oil drilling, L.A. residents continue to face other environmental hazards, such as the recent oil pipeline rupture that sent crude into the L.A. River or the ongoing cold storage warehouse fire in Boyle Heights that is spewing toxic smoke.
“I’m here to remind L.A. city and these toxic neighbors that Wilmington residents are more important than any ‘black gold’ under their homes,” Hernandez said. “We need our city to protect our families now and to stop the oil industry’s reign of power in our city. A passage of the oil phaseout ordinance today gives the city a chance to correct this wrong.”
Times staff writer Dakota Smith contributed to this report.
Business
SpaceX stock returns to Earth after record IPO
Shares in Elon Musk’s rocket company SpaceX halted their three-day slide that had erased roughly $600 billion off its market value.
SpaceX shares closed at $156.11 with a nearly 1% gain on Tuesday, a slight recovery from a 16% fall on Monday.
That loss dropped the stock below $160.95, where it ended the day June 12 after a 19% surge during its record initial public offering. The IPO gave it a market cap of $2.2 trillion, making SpaceX one of the world’s most valuable public companies.
It also turned Musk into the world’s first trillionaire, a status he retains despite the sell-off.
The downturn probably reflects investor unease over the company’s spending plans and potential debt load, analysts say.
SpaceX raised a total of $86 billion after underwriters exercised their right to sell additional shares, on top of the $75 billion initially raised. It was the largest IPO in history.
A little more than half a billion shares were distributed to institutional and retail investors at a price of $135, with the stock opening at $150 as some holders immediately flipped shares for a profit.
Shares rose as high as $176.52 during the IPO before settling at the $160.95 price. In the weeks since, shares reached a high of $225.64, meaning that some investors lost money or are underwater with paper losses.
Since the IPO, SpaceX has dropped some big bucks.
It announced last week that it was acquiring AI coding startup Cursor for $60 billion in a deal expected to close in the third quarter. The San Francisco company, founded in 2022, enables engineers to instruct software in English to run coding tasks autonomously.
It also sold $25 billion in bonds on Tuesday , unusual for a company that just went public, much less for one that just raised a record sum.
The IPO surpassed the 2019 offering by Saudi Aramco, Saudi Arabia’s state-owned oil giant, which raised $29.4 billion, the prior record holder.
S&P Global issued a report last week that assigned SpaceX a “BBB” credit rating, the lowest possible rating to qualify as an investment grade credit risk. It noted the company will have “elevated capital expenditure” through 2029.
SpaceX rivals OpenAi and Anthropic filed this month for initial public offerings that, while not expected to be as large as Musk’s company, will be large in their own right.
Wedbush analyst Dan Ives, who has been bullish on SpaceX stock, said the market is digesting “massive debt and equity raises from Big Tech players” in the coming years.
“This is part of an industry wave of debt offerings on Wall Street, like Alphabet and SpaceX among others,” he wrote in an email.
With the stock already giving up gains since the IPO, it will be further tested when tranches of locked-up shares held by current and former employees are released.
At least 20% of the shares will be released after second-quarter results are disclosed sometime in the coming months, with all the lockups expiring in December.
SpaceX, based in Texas, is the leading launch services company in the world, with its Falcon 9 rocket accounting last year for the vast majority of satellites sent into space.
It is also the leading satellite-based broadband provider with its Starlink service. But the extraordinary interest in the IPO was driven by Musk’s plans to make the company an AI leader — including plans to launch orbiting satellite data centers powered by the sun that crunch AI data.
He merged his xAI artificial intelligence company into SpaceX this year, with the combined entity recently announcing it was leasing computer power to rivals Anthropic and Google at two terrestrial data centers it has constructed.
Musk moved the company’s headquarters from Hawthorne to Texas in 2024, but it retains large operations in the South Bay city and blasts off regularly from Vandenberg Space Force Base in Santa Barbara County.
Investment research firm Morningstar placed a $780-billion valuation on SpaceX, focusing on its core rocket and Starlink broadband satellite businesses. It suggested investors wait a few months for the stock to settle before buying in.
“I think the day-to-day stock price movements are usually based on market sentiment,” said report co-author Nicolas Owens, an equity analyst at Morningstar. “So I was not surprised when it went way up right after the IPO — and I’m not surprised it [came down]. Not much has really changed in the fundamentals.”
Mike Alves, founder of Pasadena’s Vida Vision Fund, has a stake in SpaceX that accounts for 46% of his AI and robotics fund.
He said he was not perturbed by the stock drop, noting that Facebook fell under $18 a share just months after its May 2012 IPO closed at $38 a share. It has since risen more than 1,000% above its offering price.
“The volatility doesn’t really matter because you’re going to multiply your best investment many times, so I’m not so worried about it,” he said, adding that investors seeking shares could now “scoop them up at a good deal.”
-
Tennessee2 minutes ago
Dolly Parton makes surprise public appearance amid health battle
-
Texas5 minutes agoWhy Texas? Explaining ins and outs of NHL exploring team for Houston or Austin
-
Utah10 minutes ago4 Prospects the Utah Jazz Could Trade Up to Draft in the Second Round
-
Washington15 minutes agoInside Woodlawn Cemetery’s mission to preserve history
-
Vermont17 minutes agoVermont Attorney General will not prosecute state trooper who fatally shot unarmed Putney man – VTDigger
-
Virginia20 minutes agoVirginia Tech introduces Brian White as new Athletics Director
-
Wisconsin32 minutes agoTop 100 Prospect Visiting Wisconsin on Wednesday
-
West Virginia35 minutes agoYeager Airport director receives four percent pay increase – WV MetroNews