Business
Cascade of A.I. Fakes About War With Iran Causes Chaos Online
A.I. A.I.
A torrent of fake videos and images generated by artificial intelligence have overrun social networks during the first weeks of the war in Iran.
The videos — showing huge explosions that never happened, decimated city streets that were never attacked or troops protesting the war who do not exist — have added a chaotic and confusing layer to the conflict online.
The New York Times identified over 110 unique A.I.-generated images and videos from the past two weeks about the war in the Middle East. The fakes covered every aspect of the fighting: They falsely depicted screaming Israelis cowering as explosions ripped through Tel Aviv, Iranians mourning their dead and American military vessels bombarded with missiles and torpedoes.
Collectively, they were seen millions of times online through networks like X, TikTok and Facebook, and countless more times within private messaging apps popular in the region and around the world.
The Times identified the A.I. content by checking for both obvious signs — such as depictions of buildings that do not exist, garbled text and behaviors or movements that defy expectations — and for invisible watermarks embedded within the files. The posts were also checked with multiple A.I. detector tools and compared with reports from news organizations.
A sophisticated new wave of A.I. tools makes the fakes possible, enabling nearly anyone to create lifelike simulations of war that can deceive the naked eye for little to no cost. Similar content has spread in other conflicts, including the war between Ukraine and Russia. But this war has multiple fronts, and that has led to a proliferation of fake content since the United States and Israel first attacked Iran, according to experts.
“Even compared to when the Ukraine war broke out, things now are very different,” said Marc Owen Jones, an associate professor of media analytics at Northwestern University in Qatar. “We’re probably seeing far more A.I.-related content now than we ever have before.”
Overall, the A.I. fakes included …
A.I.
A.I. A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I. A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I. A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I. A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I. A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I. A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I. A.I.
A.I. A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I. A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I.
A.I. 37 fake images and videos falsely depicting active war
5 fake images and videos falsely depicting war preparation
8 fake images and videos falsely depicting destruction
5 fake images and videos falsely depicting crying soldiers
43 memes and overt uses of A.I.
13 other fake images and videos
The content has become a potent informational weapon for Tehran as it seeks to shake the public’s tolerance for war by depicting scenes of devastation and destruction across the region. The majority of A.I. videos about the war push pro-Iranian views, often to falsely demonstrate its military superiority and sophistication, according to a study of online activity by Cyabra, a social media intelligence company.
“The use of A.I. images of places in the Gulf — being burnt or damaged — becomes more important in Iran’s playbook,” Mr. Jones said, “because it allows them to give a sense that this war is more destructive and maybe more costly for America’s allies than it might actually be.”
In one of the most circulated fake videos found online, a shaky handheld scene seemingly shot from an apartment balcony in Tel Aviv shows the skyline pounded with missiles as an Israeli flag sits in the foreground. The video was viewed millions of times across platforms and was picked up by social media influencers and fringe news websites, according to a review of social media activity by The Times.
The Israeli flag in the foreground was one telltale sign that the video was A.I.-generated, experts said. To generate such videos, creators who use A.I. tools will typically write simple text instructions describing, for example, a shaky handheld video of a missile strike on Israel. The A.I. tools will then often include an Israeli flag or the Star of David to fulfill such a request. Several other A.I. videos included the flag.
There is ample genuine footage of the war being shared online, too, with cellphones and social platforms giving a real-time view of the conflict. Many of those images and videos are more subdued than the scenes made by A.I. tools.
Real footage of missile strikes was often shot from far away, typically at night, with missiles visible as little more than bright lights in the distance. Explosions in real videos are more often shown as plumes of smoke, not as fireballs, with bystanders rushing to film the scene only after the munitions meet their target.
Some A.I. videos and images, by contrast, have falsely depicted war like an over-the-top Hollywood action movie, with enormous explosions resulting in mushroom clouds, sonic booms that ripple across unnamed cities and supposed hypersonic missiles that leave glowing streaks in the sky. Real footage is sometimes enhanced by A.I. tools to make explosions appear larger and more devastating, further blurring the line between what is real and fake.
The A.I. footage has essentially created an alternate reality more suited to social media, experts said, where the exaggerated footage is more likely to find an audience.
In one instance, the A.I. fakes played an outsize role in the debate online and between governments over the fate of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln, an aircraft carrier deployed to the region. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Navy initially suggested on March 1 that they had successfully attacked the ship, possibly sinking it. That led to a deluge of A.I.-generated fakes depicting the ship or those like it on fire. Iranian users celebrated the footage online as evidence that their country’s counteroffensive was rattling the U.S.-Israeli alliance.
The United States later said that the attack was unsuccessful and that the ship was unharmed.
A.I.
Dozens of other A.I. images and videos made no effort to hide that they were fake, acting instead as a new form of digital propaganda that brought to life the political arguments typically made by governments or their propaganda arms. Those included flattering depictions of world leaders as powerful men, or dehumanizing depictions of opposition leaders.
One collection of clearly fictional videos offered a view of the Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school, which was destroyed by the United States in an apparent errant missile strike on Feb. 28, according to a preliminary inquiry. At least 175 people were killed, most of them children, according to Iranian officials.
The A.I.-generated videos unfolded like short films, showing school girls playing outside before an American fighter jet launches missiles.
Social media companies have done little to combat the scourge of A.I. videos that overwhelmed their platforms last year after OpenAI released Sora, a video-generating app that allowed anyone to create realistic fakes through a simple app. (The New York Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft in 2023, accusing them of copyright infringement of news content related to A.I. systems. The two companies have denied those claims.)
Though videos generated by many A.I. tools can include both visible and invisible watermarks labeling them as fake, those are easy to remove or obscure. Only a few of the videos identified by The Times contained such watermarks.
Elon Musk’s X, which has taken a broadly permissive approach to allowing misinformation on its platform, announced last week that it would suspend accounts from receiving revenue from the platform for 90 days if they posted A.I.-generated content of “armed conflict” without labeling it as such, in a bid to stop users from profiting off the falsehoods.
But many of the Iranian-linked accounts identified by Cyabra appeared far more focused on spreading its messages than making money.
“This is a natural front for Iran to try and exploit and it feels like this is one of the reasons it is so voluminous,” said Valerie Wirtschafter, a fellow at the Brookings Institution studying foreign policy and A.I. “It’s actually a tool of war.”
Business
Luxury outdoor mall Victoria Gardens sold for more than $500 million
Victoria Gardens, an expansive outdoor shopping center in Rancho Cucamonga, has sold for $530 million as open-air malls continue to outdraw conventional indoor centers.
The center, built in 2004 on former agricultural land at a cost of $285 million, is one of the largest regional malls in Southern California, with more than 30 buildings on 12 blocks, interspersed with parks, gardens and fountains. It also has a public library and cultural center.
The new ownership is a venture led by Newport Beach real estate company Redwood West and Panattoni, in partnership with Prime Finance and Prism Places.
Victoria Gardens gets nearly 15 million visitors annually and generates more than $1,100 per square foot in retail sales, placing it among top-grossing open-air shopping centers in the nation, Redwood West said.
It has about 160 retailers including Apple, Lululemon, Chanel, Gorjana, Sephora, Nike, Zara, AMC Theatres, Shake Shack and Macy’s.
“We see tremendous opportunity with Victoria Gardens,” John Pomer, a managing partner at Redwood West, said in a statement. “It is a one-of-a-kind, highly productive asset with deep roots in the region.”
The new owners said they will spend another $50 million on improvements, such as landscaping, signage and common area upgrades.
When it was built, the mall was part of a trend among commercial builders to create mini downtowns for cities that lacked them.
Town Center Drive in Santa Clarita and Birch Street Promenade in Brea are smaller examples of the town center concept that dates to the early 1990s, after the success of Reston Town Center in Virginia.
The seller of the mall was Brookfield Properties, a Canadian real estate giant that has been selling commercial properties in Southern California in recent years, including office buildings in downtown Los Angeles and the Shoppes at Carlsbad mall in San Diego County.
Business
El Pollo Loco is on fire as it spreads to other states and sales sizzle
Southern California’s El Pollo Loco, known for its flame-grilled chicken, is eyeing further national expansion after announcing surprisingly strong results for last year.
The Costa Mesa-based chain, which expanded to Washington and New Mexico last year, plans to open more locations in other states where customers have been lining up outside some of its new outlets for its citrus-grilled chicken dishes.
“Similar to last year, the vast majority of the 18 to 20 new openings in 2026 are expected to be outside of California,” the company’s chief executive, Liz Williams, said on an earnings call Thursday.
El Pollo Loco’s shares, which have been moving sideways for months, shot up nearly 17% Friday as its results were well above Wall Street’s expectations.
The expansion comes on the heels of a rebrand that company leadership has dubbed “Let’s Get Loco,” featuring a new store design and trials of new menu items like loaded quesadillas and horchata coffee drinks.
It also builds on the chain’s recent successes outside California.
Its first Washington store in Kent, which opened late last year, has had to cut back operating hours to manage long lines — an indicator of pent-up demand — while its New Mexico franchise partner, pleased with results, is searching for sites to open more stores, Williams said on the call.
“While California has been our home and holds a rich history for our brand, we know El Pollo Loco is destined for more,” Williams said on an earnings call last year when announcing new restaurants in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas and Washington.
New locations are coming to El Paso, Albuquerque, Dallas and Denver, and the company is in talks with potential franchise partners in the Midwest and Northeast, spokesperson Brittney Shaffer told The Times in an email.
In California, more locations are planned in Sacramento, Redding, the Bay Area and Southern California.
Shaffer said the company decided it was the right time to enter new markets after spending the past two years strengthening its foundation with improved unit economics, enhanced hospitality, and a revitalized pipeline of culinary innovation.
El Pollo Loco traces its history to the 1970s in Guasave, Sinaloa, Mexico, where it was started by shoe salesman Pancho Ochoa using his family’s citrus-marinated chicken recipe.
The chain grew to more than 80 restaurants in Mexico and opened its first U.S. location in Westlake in 1980.
In 1983, Denny’s Inc. bought Ochoa’s American restaurants and expanded its network, though largely sticking to Southern California. The chain was later sold to a private equity group.
It has struggled during some economic downturns and weathered competition from fast-casual chains like Rubio’s, Chipotle and Panera Bread, The Times reported in 2011.
But the tides are turning. Fast-casual options like Sweetgreen and Chipotle have become “skippable splurges” for customers struggling with rising costs.
El Pollo Loco may be just the right combination of price and differentiation from fast-food burgers at a time when consumers are looking to save.
El Pollo Loco, which went public on Nasdaq in 2014, reported on Thursday that its fourth-quarter comparable restaurant sales rose more than 2% from a year earlier.
Wall Street was impressed by its ability to cut costs to boost its profits.
The company said one of its secrets was to open new outlets in spaces that were already set up to be restaurants.
It saved money while expanding by not having to build out spaces from scratch, said Williams, giving the example in Dallas where it took over a former Arby’s.
The chain’s street corn-and-double-chicken burrito bowls and queso crunch double-chicken burrito bowls, which were introduced in late September, were “instrumental” in driving fourth-quarter results, the company said.
“The popularity of these hearty, value-driven, high-quality offerings was so positive that we made the strategic decision to keep both bowls as permanent menu items,” Williams said on the Thursday earnings call.
Next on the menu to give new consumers an easy-to-grasp introduction to the company’s take on chicken: chicken tenders and a chicken sandwich are expected later this year.
El Pollo Loco had 503 locations — the majority in California — as of the end of last year.
Business
This $100,000 EV from Sony is part gadget, part gamble and only available in California
As electric vehicle makers struggle to remain relevant, a new competitor is about to hit California’s roads.
It is stuffed to the sunroof with speakers and screens, and it’s a Sony.
Sony’s joint venture with Honda, Sony Honda Mobility, will launch a luxury EV brand called Afeela just in California this year.
-
Share via
The sedan is a brash bet that the two old-guard brands can succeed where others have struggled.
“We believe customers are looking for more than just a means of transportation” in their luxury EVs, said Sony Honda Mobility President and Chief Executive Shugo Yamaguchi in a statement to The Times. “They are looking for technology, safety, design, and a personalized experience.”
Afeela vehicles aim to do for driving what the Sony Walkman did for walking.
They have 28 speakers, wraparound screens, an AI assistant and an entertainment system for Karaoke or playing Sony PlayStation games.
The interior of the Afeela vehicle at Afeela Studio in Beverly Hills.
(Ronaldo Bolanos/Los Angeles Times)
Even as the end of government incentives for EVs has taken the air out of the market, Sony and Honda are hoping there are enough high-end Tesla buyers who may be looking to try something different.
Some EV enthusiasts have been alienated by Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk’s affiliation with President Trump, who has strangled government support for green vehicles.
In West Los Angeles, a big Afeela ad above a Tesla dealership puts the EV leader squarely in its crosshairs.
“Get stares, not glares,” the billboard reads, with a glamour shot of a sleek, silver Afeela 1.
Tesla’s market share in California slipped to 48% last year from around 53% a year earlier.
Honda’s own EVs haven’t been wildly successful but their market share in California edged up to 3.8% last year compared to 1.8% a year earlier.
Afeela is entering the market at a time when federal support for EVs is low and public enthusiasm is faltering.
Major automakers including Ford, General Motors and Stellantis are paring back their EV ambitions. Lucid, a Newark, Calif.-based EV maker, has been struggling to turn a profit and recently laid off more than 300 employees.
Irvine-based luxury EV maker Rivian said last year that it was laying off more than 800 workers as it looked to cut costs.
Afeela has showrooms in San José, Beverly Hills and Century City. The company is manufacturing the cars at a Honda plant in Marysville, Ohio, and will make its first deliveries at the end of the year.
The Sony and Honda joint venture is in the midst of legal obstacles as it aims to build a solid reputation. Last August, the California New Car Dealers Assn. filed a lawsuit against American Honda Motor Company and Sony Honda Mobility, alleging that the companies violated franchise law by selling Afeela vehicles directly to consumers rather than through Honda dealerships.
Various display screens inside the Afeela vehicle at Afeela Studio, Beverly Hills.
(Ronaldo Bolanos/Los Angeles Times)
For now, Californians can reserve an Afeela 1 for a $200 deposit. Selling only in the Golden State at first will allow the company to learn from an engaged customer base, said Yamaguchi.
“California is one of the most advanced markets for EV adoption, grid infrastructure, and new mobility technology,” he said. “It also represents a culture of innovation and creativity that aligns well with the Afeela vision.”
The company is planning to begin sales in Arizona next year.
The car comes in two trims, starting at $89,900 and $102,900. Both trims come with level two automation. When using a vehicle with level 2 automation, the driver must remain in control and attentive while the system assists with braking, acceleration or steering.
While some of Afeela’s tech may have a leg up on the competition, the brand will have to prove there’s healthy demand for it at that price, said Brian Moody, an auto industry analyst.
(Ronaldo Bolanos/Los Angeles Times)
Sony and Honda are looking to capitalize on growing interest in self-driving technology and plan to eventually equip all their vehicles for full autonomy. The Afeela 1 comes with 18 cameras, nine radars, 12 ultrasonic sensors, and lidar, a laser-based radar that Waymo uses to power its autonomous taxis.
“You do have to pay attention and we definitely don’t want people to believe that they can just go to sleep behind the wheel,” said Raisu Williams, an Afeela engagement operations associate. “But we are aiming for that level four autonomy, where you don’t have to drive at all.”
While some of Afeela’s tech may have a leg up on the competition, the brand will have to prove there’s healthy demand for it at that price, said Brian Moody, an auto industry analyst.
“Tesla and its platforms are aging, and the Lucids and Afeelas of the world feel more modern, more futuristic,” Moody said. “We’ll see if the car can make the jump from early adopters and tech-type people to the mainstream.”
The AFEELA logo sits on top of a rear cameras of a Afeela vehicle.
(Ronaldo Bolanos/Los Angeles Times)
Afeela is hoping to have more success than Lucid with attracting a wide audience. Lucid laid off more people this year after laying off around 6,800 people in 2024 and hiring actor Timotheé Chalamet as a brand ambassador.
“I do think Afeela is in danger of heading down the same road as as Lucid,” Moody said. “If those cars can be successful in California, will that translate to success throughout the rest of the country and the world?”
Sony Honda Mobility got its start when the two founding companies formed a strategic alliance in 2022. The new company unveiled its first Afeela prototype in 2023 at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.
AFEELA 1 unveiled during a Sony news conference at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas last year. ,
(Ian Maule/AFP via Getty Images)
Auto industry experts said Honda’s bet on Afeela is somewhat risky for the major automaker, but it could pay off. Because Sony and Honda each own 50% of Sony Honda Mobility, the companies reduce their liability by sharing risk, said auto analyst Kristin Shaw.
Honda has popular gas-powered models such as the Pilot and the CR-V to fall back on if their ambitions with Sony fall through.
“Honda’s bread and butter is still in their production vehicles,” Shaw said. “Honda is hedging its bets across the board, and Afeela is one way for them to explore what could happen.”
-
Detroit, MI1 week agoU.S. Postal Service could run out of money within a year
-
Pennsylvania1 week agoPa. man found guilty of raping teen girl who he took to Mexico
-
Oklahoma6 days ago
OSSAA unveils Class 6A-2A basketball state tournament brackets, schedule
-
Sports1 week agoKeith Olbermann under fire for calling Lou Holtz a ‘scumbag’ after legendary coach’s death
-
Michigan5 days agoOperation BBQ Relief helping with Southwest Michigan tornado recovery
-
Southeast5 days ago‘90 Day Fiancé’ alum’s boyfriend on trial for attempted murder over wild ‘Boca Bash’ accusations
-
Health6 days agoAncient herb known as ‘nature’s Valium’ touted for improving sleep and anxiety
-
Nebraska2 days agoWildfire forces immediate evacuation order for Farnam residents