Maryland
How AI misconduct cases are handled across Maryland campuses
By TIASIA SAUNDERS
Capital News Service
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence technologies has prompted universities across Maryland to adopt AI policies quickly. An examination of academic integrity policies shows that enforcement may be inconsistent, with instructors given significant discretion in applying these guidelines, according to experts.
While many universities acknowledge that AI detection tools are unreliable, fewer clearly define what constitutes evidence of AI misconduct, interviews with campus officials show.
“Because AI is a new and evolving technology, the larger challenge we have experienced has been when faculty have been unclear or vague in their messages around usage of AI tools, leading to a gray area where students may have needed to make assumptions,” Pavan Purswani, interim assistant dean of students at the University of Baltimore, said.
At several Maryland Universities, including the University of Maryland, University of Maryland, Baltimore, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Loyola University Maryland, University of Baltimore and Morgan State University, guidelines caution against relying on AI detection tools as definitive proof of misconduct, according to guidelines and policies reviewed by CNS.
Instead, the universities advise that such tools be used only as indicators and not as the sole basis for disciplinary decisions, emphasizing that instructors should consider additional context and communicate clearly with students about how AI tools are evaluated.
Across the Maryland university policies reviewed, AI-related cases are generally addressed under broader academic integrity frameworks rather than AI-specific standards, with determinations about sufficient evidence often left to faculty judgment.
As a result, the type and threshold of evidence can vary significantly from case to case
“We found it was really kind of a losing battle to define what constituted AI misconduct, and that what we needed was a much broader reckoning of how we define misconduct to begin with,” Katie Grantz, the provost and dean of faculty at St Mary’s College of Maryland, said.
She added that St. Mary’s now requires every syllabus to include an AI policy, emphasizing that expectations may vary by instructor and discipline, but that students must be clearly informed of those rules in advance.
The reliance on instructor discretion is reflected across multiple Maryland universities, where policies often grant professors broad authority to define acceptable AI use and determine whether a violation has occurred.
A review of academic integrity policies across Maryland universities shows that in some cases, faculty may resolve concerns informally with students; in other cases, they may be escalated through formal misconduct processes, creating a system where similar behavior can result in different outcomes.
Craig Farmer, the assistant director of student conduct at Johns Hopkins University, explained that when students engage in similar behavior, how a case is initially handled can vary widely depending on the instructor. Some faculty may treat a violation as minor and assign a single charge, while others may pursue multiple charges or formal action.
“It’s quite possible that if two students do the same thing, one might receive one charge while another receives three,” Farmer said, adding that their office works to ensure outcomes are ultimately consistent.
At St. Mary’s College of Maryland, Loyola University Maryland and Johns Hopkins University, faculty are generally expected to report or initiate misconduct proceedings when violations are identified formally. In contrast, at Towson University, Bowie State University, and Frostburg State University, policies allow instructors greater discretion, enabling them to address concerns directly with students or to decide whether to escalate cases to formal misconduct processes.
All of the schools reviewed have published AI guidelines to provide suggestions on how to navigate using generative AI for schoolwork.
The University of Maryland requires instructors to define how AI can be used in their courses, and students are expected to cite the use of AI tools properly. The university also emphasizes transparency and human oversight when using generative AI tools.
“Our code of academic integrity does not have a rule saying that AI use is prohibited,” said James Bond, assistant dean of students and director of student conduct. “Our code speaks to five different types of violations: cheating, facilitation of academic misconduct, fabrication, plagiarism and self-plagiarism.”
Inconsistent classroom policies can create uncertainty for students about what is permitted across courses and may lead to different interpretations of similar behavior, said Jessica Stansbury, founding director of the Center for AI Learning and Community-Engaged Innovation at the University of Baltimore.
“This inconsistency creates confusion of expectations for students, and more importantly, a stigma of AI use,” she said, adding that conflicting classroom rules can discourage open discussion about how students use the tools.
At some Maryland colleges, such as St. Mary’s College of Maryland and Salisbury University, faculty have discussed creating standardized frameworks to define and evaluate AI use in academic work.
These approaches include developing universal scales to distinguish between acceptable use and misconduct, aiming to reduce ambiguity across courses.
“We’re looking at adopting a universal AI scale—like a zero-to-six or red-to-green system—that would be task-specific and allow instructors to choose different levels of use,” Grantz said.
These conversations reflect a broader shift in how colleges are approaching AI in education, moving away from rigid prohibitions and toward more adaptive, guidance-based systems. As AI tools become increasingly embedded in everyday academic work, universities are being pushed to rethink not only how misconduct is defined, but how learning itself is assessed.
“We as universities should accept the fact that now AI tools are ubiquitous. They’re everywhere. I believe we should be teaching students how to use AI responsibly. We should be finding different ways to integrate AI into the lesson planned while also being creative and strategic with how we are challenging our students to think critically as well,” Farmer said.
Related
Maryland
Maryland official denies receiving warning over alleged nude photos to deputies
SALISBURY, Md. (WBFF) — A previously private dispute between Wicomico County’s two highest-ranking elected officials has reached a breaking point, sparking a potential public records battle over whether the sheriff ordered the county executive to stop sending his deputies sexually explicit images.
Wicomico County Executive Julie Giordano and Sheriff Mike Lewis are at odds over the existence of a document that sources allege is a demand for Giordano to cease sending semi-nude, nude or pornographic photographs of herself to sheriff’s deputies.
Wicomico County Executive Julie Giordano, the first woman elected to lead the county, speaks at Maryland Gov. Wes Moore’s ‘Delivering for Maryland’ tour stop on Thursday, June 4, 2026, at Salisbury University. (Steve Pierce/Spotlight on Maryland)
While Giordano flatly denied that such a document exists, describing the allegations as a “horrific rumor” and a product of political malice, Sheriff Lewis confirmed the letter’s existence in an interview last week. However, he said he would not release it to the public without a court order.
The conflicting accounts have prompted Spotlight on Maryland to file a formal demand for records under the Maryland Public Information Act (MPIA). The county has thus far withheld key documents, citing exemptions for personal privacy and records being “investigatory.”
Conflicting narratives
The controversy stems from allegations that Giordano, both during her 2022 campaign and early into her tenure as county executive, sent nude or semi-nude photos to deputies in the sheriff’s office. Sources familiar with the matter allege that in October 2024, Lewis issued a letter to the county executive demanding an end to the behavior.
When asked about the situation last week, Giordano dismissed the claims as “false narratives.”
There was never a letter sent to stop,” Giordano said. “So, basically what happened was, there was a horrific rumor that went around, and that’s just what happens in a campaign, and so, we’ve moved on from it.”
Giordano said she and Lewis had discussed the matter and worked through it.
“We have a campaign coming up, so I think we have handled it quite well, and Sheriff Lewis and I have had those conversations,” Giordano said. “He seems to be, ‘I don’t really know where this came from, I don’t know why this happened,’ and that sort of thing, so we’ve worked together on that and sort of got over it together.”
Wicomico County Sheriff’s Office logo outside of its headquarters on Thursday, June 4, 2026. (Steve Pierce/Spotlight on Maryland)
Asked whether deputies who claim to have received the images were false or lying, Giordano said she knew of no deputies who had made such a claim.
“I don’t believe that there are any deputies who have claimed to have received any of them, at least not that I know of,” she said. “I know of none that have claimed to have received anything.”
It’s not something that happened,” Giordano added. “Again, just the sad side of politics, and it’s just a shame that people I think go out of their way to hurt people and try to create these false narratives and false rumors.”
However, when pressed hours after Spotlight’s interview with Giordano in Salisbury, Sheriff Lewis contradicted the county executive’s account. While declining to discuss the specific contents of the correspondence, the sheriff confirmed, “The letter does exist.”
Lewis declined to release the document voluntarily, saying, “I’m not going to give you a copy of that letter unless I’m ordered to by the court. And when I’m ordered by the court, you will get a copy of that letter.”
Meanwhile, the county’s legal response to Spotlight’s public records request proves the existence of the letter.
After the county initially failed to acknowledge a January request for communications involving terms such as “nudes” and “pornographic,” an attorney for Sinclair, Inc., the parent company of Spotlight on Maryland, issued a formal demand for documents.
The county attorney has withheld the contested records, arguing their release would constitute an “unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.”
Wicomico County Executive Julie Giordano told Spotlight on Maryland on Thursday, June 4, 2026, at Salisbury University that she has not received a letter telling her to stop sending alleged nude photos to sheriff’s deputies. (Steve Pierce/Spotlight on Maryland)
When pressed, Giordano said she was aware of the records request in January but disputed that a cease-and-desist letter existed.
“I never received a cease-and-desist letter,” she said. “I would go on the record and say that the reason that the document didn’t get released is because it doesn’t exist because I never received a cease-and-desist letter from them.”
While the document in question allegedly did not contain the headline of “cease or desist,” sources claim the letter did tell the Wicomico County executive to stop.
Giordano also said she understood the sheriff’s office had consulted with the Maryland Attorney General’s Office and followed the guidance it received. The legal response from the sheriff’s office came from the Wicomico County attorney, not the attorney general.
Attorneys for Spotlight on Maryland sent a final demand letter to the sheriff’s office on Monday, signaling that a lawsuit will be filed if the records are not produced within two days.
Under the MPIA, while agencies may cite exemptions, those decisions are subject to legal challenge when the public interest in transparency regarding elected officials outweighs individual privacy claims.
A tense working relationship
The public dispute threatens a fragile peace between the county executive and the county sheriff.
Long-time Wicomico County Sheriff Mike Lewis said on Thursday, June 4, 2026, at his office outside of Salisbury, Md., that a “letter does exist” when asked about a document asking County Executive Julie Giordano to stop sending photos to his deputies. (Steve Pierce/Spotlight on Maryland)
Lewis acknowledged that the relationship has historically been strained but claimed they have worked to put the “bad chapter” behind them, and he noted the sheriff’s office has secured funding and benefits for the deputies.
I have not always had a good relationship with my county executive,” Lewis said. “For the last year and a half, I think we both have worked very hard to get along for the betterment of Wicomico County.”
Lewis pointed to recent benefits for his deputies, including pay raises, disability benefits, retirement changes and vehicles, as examples of the current working relationship between his office and the county executive.
“Right now, I have a great working relationship, working relationship, with this county executive, and I don’t want to revisit the bad chapter,” Lewis said. “I obviously believe in truth, and if you guys obviously choose to explore other means to get a copy of that letter — that does exist — that’s on you guys.”
Do you have any tips or information related to this story? Send news tips togmcollins@sbgtv.comor contact Spotlight on Maryland’s hotline at (410) 467-4670.
Follow Gary Collins on X and Instagram. Spotlight on Maryland is a collaboration between FOX45 News, WJLA in Washington, D.C., and The Baltimore Sun.
Maryland
Maryland man charged with arson after investigators say he set his home on fire
WASHINGTON COUNTY, Md. – A Maryland man is facing arson charges after investigators say he intentionally set fire to his home Saturday night in Washington County.
What we know:
Investigators say 25‑year‑old Austin David Brown of Knoxville has been charged with first‑degree arson, first‑degree malicious burning, malicious destruction of property over $1,000, and animal cruelty.
Shortly before 11:35 p.m., firefighters responded to a house fire on Kaetzel Road and determined the blaze had been intentionally set. Neighbors told investigators the occupant, Brown, was seen walking away from the home shortly after the fire began. Deputy State Fire Marshals later received additional information, including security camera footage from a nearby resident, they say further linked Brown to the fire.
Austin David Brown (Deputy State Fire Marshal)
An arrest warrant was issued charging him in connection with the incident.
On Monday, investigators learned Brown had returned to the area and located him on Weverton Road before he ran into the woods. After an approximately 40‑minute search, he surrendered and was taken into custody without incident. He was transported to the Washington County Detention Center, where he is being held without bond.
The investigation is continuing.
The Source: Information in this article comes from the Deputy State Fire Marshal.
Maryland
Maryland Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for June 8, 2026
Powerball, Mega Millions jackpots: What to know in case you win
Here’s what to know in case you win the Powerball or Mega Millions jackpot.
Just the FAQs, USA TODAY
The Maryland Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at June 8, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Powerball numbers from June 8 drawing
03-24-34-43-49, Powerball: 20, Power Play: 3
Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 3 numbers from June 8 drawing
Midday: 5-4-1
Evening: 4-4-0
Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 4 numbers from June 8 drawing
Midday: 6-0-0-3
Evening: 5-9-1-5
Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Pick 5 numbers from June 8 drawing
Midday: 3-1-5-2-3
Evening: 4-6-1-4-0
Check Pick 5 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Cash Pop numbers from June 8 drawing
9 a.m.: 01
1 p.m.: 07
6 p.m.: 14
11 p.m.: 12
Check Cash Pop payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Bonus Match 5 numbers from June 8 drawing
11-13-14-19-35, Bonus: 38
Check Bonus Match 5 payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning MultiMatch numbers from June 8 drawing
10-21-22-25-26-32
Check MultiMatch payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Powerball Double Play numbers from June 8 drawing
01-16-20-21-49, Powerball: 10
Check Powerball Double Play payouts and previous drawings here.
Keno
Drawings are held every four minutes. Check winning numbers here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize
Maryland Lottery retailers will redeem prizes up to $600. For prizes above $600, winners can claim by mail or in person from the Maryland Lottery office, an Expanded Cashing Authority Program location or cashiers’ windows at Maryland casinos. Prizes over $5,000 must be claimed in person.
Claiming by Mail
Sign your winning ticket and complete a claim form. Include a photocopy of a valid government-issued ID and a copy of a document that shows proof of your Social Security number or Federal Tax ID number. Mail these to:
Maryland Lottery Customer Resource Center
1800 Washington Boulevard
Suite 330
Baltimore, MD 21230
For prizes over $600, bring your signed ticket, a government-issued photo ID, and proof of your Social Security or Federal Tax ID number to Maryland Lottery headquarters, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, MD. Claims are by appointment only, Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. This location handles all prize amounts, including prizes over $5,000.
Winning Tickets Worth $25,000 or Less
Maryland Lottery headquarters and select Maryland casinos can redeem winning tickets valued up to $25,000. Note that casinos cannot cash prizes over $600 for non-resident and resident aliens (tax ID beginning with “9”). You must be at least 21 years of age to enter a Maryland casino. Locations include:
- Horseshoe Casino: 1525 Russell Street, Baltimore, MD
- MGM National Harbor: 101 MGM National Avenue, Oxon Hill, MD
- Live! Casino: 7002 Arundel Mills Circle, Hanover, MD
- Ocean Downs Casino: 10218 Racetrack Road, Berlin, MD
- Hollywood Casino: 1201 Chesapeake Overlook Parkway, Perryville, MD
- Rocky Gap Casino: 16701 Lakeview Road NE, Flintstone, MD
Check previous winning numbers and payouts at Maryland Lottery.
When are the Maryland Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 11 p.m. ET Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 11 p.m. ET Tuesday and Friday.
- Pick 3, Pick 4 and Pick 5 Midday: 12:27 p.m. ET Monday through Friday, 12:28 p.m. ET Saturday and Sunday.
- Pick 3, 4 and 5 Evening: 7:56 p.m. ET Monday through Saturday, 8:10 p.m. ET on Sunday.
- Cash4Life: 9 p.m. ET daily.
- Cash Pop: 9 a.m., 1 p.m., 6 p.m. and 11 p.m. daily.
- Bonus Match 5: 7:56 p.m. ET Monday through Saturday, 8:10 p.m. ET on Sunday.
- MultiMatch: 7:56 p.m. Monday and Thursday.
- Powerball Double Play: 11 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Maryland editor. You can send feedback using this form.
-
News15 minutes agoIn Nevada, Trump’s policies are making things tough for Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo
-
New York2 hours agoThis Parking Spot Is Free. Should It Be?
-
Los Angeles, Ca2 hours agoO.C. Uber customer says driver asleep in Tesla on 405 Freeway
-
Detroit, MI2 hours agoOne person dead, another in custody following shooting in Detroit, police say
-
San Francisco, CA2 hours agoBay Area artists celebrate Wong Kim Ark’s legacy in San Francisco’s Chinatown
-
Dallas, TX2 hours agoPlano’s new tax increment reinvestment zone could allocate $700M for Dallas Stars arena
-
Miami, FL2 hours agoHome intruder shot and killed in Miami Gardens
-
Boston, MA3 hours agoRays hold on to beat Tolle, Red Sox 4-3