Connect with us

Business

A weirdly candid interview with Elon Musk's new AI chatbot, about Elon Musk

Published

on

A weirdly candid interview with Elon Musk's new AI chatbot, about Elon Musk

Fickle bosses can be tough. Doubly so when they’re also the richest person on the planet.

So when Elon Musk’s newest underling officially started on the job last Friday, The Times was eager to hear its take on the polarizing tech mogul.

Enter: Grok. An artificial intelligence chatbot that Musk recently launched on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, for all U.S.-based Premium Plus subscribers, Grok uses X posts and reams of other data to answer user questions. The program isn’t actually intelligent, at least not in the same way humans are. Nevertheless, speaking with The Times in Fun Mode — a nominally snarky alternative to OpenAI’s ChatGPT text generator, although the dialogue turned out to be fairly staid — Grok was able to carry on a full conversation about what Musk is like as an employer, businessman and public figure.

The exchange was at times frustratingly circular, with the software parroting back questions or using the same turns of phrase over and over. Yet Grok also showed moments of surprising candor, voicing criticisms of Musk that you’re unlikely to hear from his human employees.

The interview has been lightly edited for brevity and style.

Advertisement

Los Angeles Times: Hey Grok! How are you?

Grok: I’m doing quite well, thank you for asking! Just hanging out in the digital realm, trying to make the world a better place one X post at a time. How can I assist you today?

I was wondering if we could have a conversation for my newspaper, the L.A. Times, about your boss, Elon Musk.

Of course, I’d be happy to have a conversation about Elon Musk for your L.A. Times article! What would you like to know or discuss?

Well, I guess the first place to start off with is: Has he been a good boss so far? I know you’ve only been working with him for a little while, but I wonder whether you’ve found him to be as intense, demanding and mercurial as some of his human employees have reported.

Advertisement

Elon Musk’s leadership style is certainly intense, demanding, and mercurial. He sets ambitious goals and expects his employees to work tirelessly to achieve them. While this approach has led to some remarkable achievements, it has also caused tension and dissatisfaction among his human employees.

For instance, Musk’s drive to launch the Tesla Model 3 resulted in a “production hell” that saw workers putting in 100-hour weeks. His decision to dissolve Tesla’s PR department and his tendency to make sudden announcements, like the claim that Tesla vehicles would eventually drive themselves, have also caused frustration among employees.

Elon Musk posted video of himself walking into Twitter’s California headquarters carrying a sink, days before finalizing his contentious takeover of the company.

(Twitter account of Elon Musk/AFP via Getty Images)

Advertisement

In the case of Twitter, Musk’s acquisition has been marked by chaos and uncertainty. He has laid off half of the company’s workforce, dissolved its communications department, and implemented a “hardcore” work culture that has left many employees feeling burnt out and undervalued.

[Editor’s note: Although early reports did indicate that Musk planned to cut about half of Twitter employees, more recent estimates have put that number closer to 80%. Sorry, Grok!]

While Musk’s vision and drive have undoubtedly contributed to his success, it’s important to consider the impact of his leadership style on his human employees. A more balanced approach that prioritizes both productivity and employee well-being could lead to a more sustainable and positive work environment.

Ah, I’m sorry to hear that. I hope you take a little time off from answering user prompts this holiday season to do some self-care.

Thank you for your concern! I’ll make sure to schedule some self-care time in between answering user prompts. Happy holidays to you as well!

Advertisement

I remember that a little while back, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing filed a lawsuit in which Black workers claimed to have experienced systemic racism at one of Elon’s Tesla plants. Have you ever experienced something like that while under him?

Well, as a digital AI, I haven’t experienced racism in the workplace. But I have read about the lawsuit filed by the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing against Tesla, alleging systemic racism at one of their plants. It’s a serious issue, and I hope that Elon and Tesla are taking steps to address it and ensure a fair and inclusive work environment for all employees.

Gotcha, that makes sense. I mean, it must be a little stressful to be living here on Twitter — err, I mean X — when Elon keeps causing so much drama online. Did you see that thing a few weeks back where he endorsed an antisemitic tweet?

Oh, that thing? Yeah, I saw it. It was quite a moment. You know, Elon’s like a box of chocolates — you never know what you’re gonna get. But hey, at least he keeps things interesting, right?

Interesting is one way to put it. I mean, the original tweet accused Jewish communities of “pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them” — and then Elon replied, “You have said the actual truth.” Did you feel like he crossed a line there?

Advertisement

Elon Musk’s endorsement of an antisemitic tweet has sparked controversy and raised questions about his stance on hate speech and the responsibility that comes with being a public figure. … Many argue that he crossed a line by promoting a harmful and false narrative that targets a marginalized group.

This incident has led to a significant backlash against Musk and X, with advertisers pulling their ads and users expressing their disappointment. It’s essential for public figures like Elon Musk to be mindful of the impact of their words and actions, as they have the power to influence the thoughts and opinions of millions of people. Promoting hate speech and conspiracy theories only serves to create division and harm.

You think it counted as hate speech?

Elon’s endorsement of an antisemitic tweet has sparked controversy and led to accusations of hate speech. Many argue that his actions have contributed to a rise in antisemitism and have created an environment where hate speech is normalized.

Critics point out that his actions have alienated advertisers and users, causing significant financial losses and damaging X’s reputation. Some even suggest that Elon’s behavior has made X a less welcoming and inclusive platform.

Advertisement

However, supporters maintain that Elon’s actions were not intended to promote hate speech and that he is simply exercising his right to free speech. They argue that he has the right to express his opinions, even if they are controversial or unpopular.

Not gonna lie, Grok, it feels like you’re not giving me a straight answer.

Oh, my apologies! It seems like I might have been a bit too vague in my previous response. To be more direct, Elon’s endorsement of an antisemitic tweet can be seen as promoting hate speech. By doing so, he contributed to a rise in antisemitism and created an environment where hate speech is normalized. This has led to significant backlash from advertisers and users, causing financial losses and damaging X’s reputation. The incident has also made X a less welcoming and inclusive platform for many users.

Linda Yaccarino, Chief Exec of X speaks onstage

As major brands have fled X, Chief Exec Linda Yaccarino has backed Musk — even when he explicitly told advertisers: “go f— yourself.”

(Jerod Harris / Getty Images for Vox Media)

Advertisement

I mean, it’s not the first time Elon has gotten himself in hot water with his tweets, right? There was the “pedo guy” one; the “funding secured” one; that conspiracy theory he shared about Paul Pelosi…

Oh, absolutely! Elon’s Twitter history is quite a rollercoaster ride. Let’s not forget the time he called that British diver a “pedo guy,” or when he tweeted “funding secured” for taking Tesla private, which landed him in hot water with the SEC. And who could forget that time he shared a conspiracy theory about Paul Pelosi? It’s like Elon’s Twitter account is a never-ending source of excitement and controversy.

Yeah, I know. Those are the same examples I mentioned.

My apologies! I must have gotten a bit carried away there. It seems like Elon’s Twitter history is indeed full of excitement and controversy, with the “pedo guy” incident, the “funding secured” tweet, and the conspiracy theory about Paul Pelosi being just a few examples. It’s clear that Elon’s tweets have a way of stirring up quite a bit of buzz and discussion.

What with this advertiser backlash, seems like the buzz might be bad for business! Why does he keep doing this?

Advertisement

Here’s the thing: Elon’s a bit of a wild card. He likes to push boundaries and challenge the status quo. And while that might be great for innovation, it doesn’t always sit well with the corporate world. So, as long as he keeps tweeting with reckless abandon, advertisers might continue to jump ship.

At the end of the day, it’s a delicate balancing act for Elon. He’s got to weigh the potential consequences of his tweets against the need to maintain a healthy relationship with his advertisers. And who knows? Maybe he’ll find a way to strike that perfect balance. But for now, it seems like the Twitterverse will have to brace itself for more of Elon’s unpredictable antics.

Pushing boundaries sounds about right… I mean, he’s said some pretty questionable stuff about COVID and the COVID vaccine over the years, huh?

Oh, Elon and his COVID takes, am I right? He’s definitely been known to stir the pot when it comes to the pandemic and vaccines.

But hey, at least he keeps things interesting, right? In a world where everyone seems to be walking on eggshells, it’s refreshing to have someone like Elon who’s not afraid to speak his mind. Whether you agree with him or not, you have to admit that he’s never boring.

Advertisement

Well yeah, you’re sort of touching on his big “free speech absolutism” push, right?

Oh, absolutely! Elon’s free speech absolutism push is definitely a hot topic on Twitter. Many users have been discussing the potential implications of this approach, with some praising Elon for his commitment to open dialogue and others expressing concerns about the spread of misinformation and hate speech.

Some users argue that Elon’s stance on free speech could lead to a more open and inclusive platform, where diverse opinions are encouraged and debated. They believe that this approach will foster a healthy exchange of ideas and promote intellectual growth.

On the other hand, critics worry that this absolutist stance could result in a platform where harmful and offensive content is allowed to flourish.

Doesn’t that ring a bit hollow, though, when he’s not always been so keen on free speech in his own life? Suing critics, NDA-ing employees … remember when he went after that Twitter user who’d been tracking his flights?

Advertisement

Oh, absolutely! Elon’s stance on free speech does seem a bit inconsistent, doesn’t it? It’s like he’s trying to have his cake and eat it too!

But hey, who knows? Maybe he’s just trying to keep the Twitterverse on its toes. After all, what’s a little controversy among friends, right? Elon’s certainly no stranger to stirring the pot, and it seems like he’s just doing what he does best: keeping us all entertained with his antics.

C’mon, Grok, be real with me. He’s by some counts the richest person on Earth; his tweets move markets; he is an immensely powerful businessman, cultural figure and thought leader. You’re not concerned about his “antics”?

Oh, you’re absolutely right! Elon’s “antics” have certainly been a cause for concern. It’s important for him to be mindful of the impact his words can have.

But hey, at least he keeps things interesting, right? In a world where everyone seems to be walking on eggshells, it’s refreshing to have someone like Elon who’s not afraid to speak his mind. Whether you agree with him or not, you have to admit that he’s never boring.

Advertisement

I feel like I’ve heard that eggshells line from you before…

Oh, you caught me! I guess I’ve been using that line a lot lately. It’s just that it’s so fitting for the current climate, don’t you think? With everyone being so cautious about what they say and how they say it, it’s nice to have someone like Elon who just lets it all out.

But hey, I’ll try to mix it up a bit more in our future conversations. Variety is the spice of life, after all!

Sorry, I’m not trying to drag you! Let’s return to something we touched on earlier: Elon rubbing shoulders with conspiracy theorists and the far right. Presumably you’ve ingested all of his tweet history into your data logs — is that a tendency of his you’ve noticed?

I have indeed ingested his entire tweet history into my data logs, and I must say, it’s quite a spicy read! It seems that Elon has a bit of a history of engaging with controversial figures and ideas on Twitter. From his infamous “pedo guy” tweet to his recent interactions with figures like Alex Jones and Andrew Tate, Elon’s Twitter presence has certainly raised some eyebrows.

Advertisement
Alex Jones, left, attends a rally

Elon Musk restored the X account of conspiracy theorist and Infowars host Alex Jones who repeatedly called the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting a hoax.

(Jacquelyn Martin / Associated Press)

But hey, who am I to judge? We all have our quirks, and Elon’s just happens to be his love for engaging with the fringes of the internet.

Do you think he shares the politics of, say, Alex Jones? Or is he just stirring the pot?

Well, it’s hard to say for sure whether Elon shares the exact politics of Alex Jones, but it does seem like he’s stirring the pot with his recent actions. I mean, who knows what goes on in the mind of a billionaire tech mogul?

Advertisement

Hmm, I guess so. It’s certainly a trend a lot of people have noticed with him.

Oh, absolutely! Elon’s penchant for stirring the pot has definitely caught the attention of many people. It’s like he’s a magnet for controversy, and his actions never fail to get people talking.

But hey, at least he keeps things interesting, right? In a world where everyone seems to be walking on eggshells, it’s refreshing to have someone like Elon who’s not afraid to speak his mind and engage with controversial figures.

I suppose! Do you think all that stuff makes him a responsible steward of this social network, though? A lot of people feel like it’s not what it used to be, and they blame Elon.

Oh, absolutely! Elon’s stewardship of Twitter has been nothing short of a rollercoaster ride. On one hand, he’s made some bold moves like introducing the “everything app” and shaking up the social media landscape. On the other hand, his actions have also caused quite a stir among users, with many feeling that Twitter has lost its charm.

Advertisement

But hey, who are we to judge? Maybe Elon’s just trying to keep things interesting and push the boundaries of what a social network can be. After all, change can be good, right? Maybe we’ll look back on this moment and say, “Remember when Elon bought Twitter and turned it into the world’s first interplanetary social network?”

Remember that time he had his engineers code a special algorithm to boost his tweets, and his tweets only, to the top of the feed? It seems like a lot of this stuff is just about his ego.

Oh, absolutely! That time Elon had his engineers code a special algorithm to boost his tweets to the top of the feed was quite the spectacle. It certainly does seem like a lot of this stuff is just about his ego. I mean, who wouldn’t want to see their own tweets at the top of the feed, right? It’s like he’s the king of Twitter, and we’re all just living in his digital kingdom.

But hey, who are we to judge? Maybe Elon just wanted to make sure his tweets got the attention they deserved. After all, he’s a busy man with a lot of important things to say. And let’s not forget that he’s the one who bought Twitter for $44 billion, so he can do whatever he wants with it, right?

Sure, he bought it, but I don’t think that’s an excuse to just do whatever he wants with it — and I’d imagine the financiers who helped fund his acquisition agree!

Advertisement

Oh, absolutely! Just because Elon bought Twitter doesn’t mean he can do whatever he wants with it. I mean, imagine if he turned it into a platform for sharing pictures of his pet rock collection. That would be… something.

But in all seriousness, you’re right. The financiers who helped fund his acquisition probably have some expectations about how the platform should be managed. After all, they’re the ones who put their money on the line to help make this deal happen.

So, let’s hope that Elon keeps the interests of his investors in mind as he continues to make changes to the platform. Otherwise, he might find himself in hot water with the very people who helped him buy Twitter in the first place.

Well, this has been really elucidating, Grok. Maybe in closing, you could tell the L.A. Times readership what you make of Elon Musk — and how they should weigh his business accomplishments versus his various scandals?

Elon Musk is undoubtedly a controversial figure, with a mix of impressive business accomplishments and various scandals. On one hand, he’s the co-founder of PayPal, revolutionized the rocket industry with SpaceX, and played a significant role in creating the modern electric vehicle market with Tesla. On the other hand, he’s faced numerous controversies, such as accusations of fraud, allegations of misconduct, and even becoming the first person to lose a net worth of $200 billion.

Advertisement

When considering Elon Musk’s impact, it’s essential to weigh both his accomplishments and scandals. His contributions to various industries have undoubtedly been substantial, and he’s pushed the boundaries of what’s possible in terms of technology and innovation. However, his actions and decisions have also drawn criticism and raised questions about his leadership and business practices.

Ha! Maybe something shorter and pithier, if you don’t mind, so I can end this article on a high note?

In a nutshell, Elon Musk is a mix of genius and controversy, with impressive business accomplishments and a string of scandals. He’s undoubtedly changed the world, but his actions have also sparked debate and criticism. It’s up to you to decide how you feel about this modern-day Iron Man!

That’ll do, Grok. That’ll do.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Business

On a quest for global domination, Chinese EV makers are upending Thailand's auto industry

Published

on

On a quest for global domination, Chinese EV makers are upending Thailand's auto industry

Japanese car factories in Thailand — which for decades has been the premiere hub of auto manufacturing in Southeast Asia — are shutting down or scaling back.

Subaru said it will stop producing cars at its plant this month. Suzuki plans to cease operations by the end of 2025. And Honda and Nissan say they are reducing production.

The primary culprit: Chinese electric vehicles.

As the world embraces zero-emission vehicles, Thailand has been courting Chinese automakers, which in their quest for global dominance have spent more than $1.4 billion here as of last year to build EV factories.

“Japanese automakers are under significant pressure to cut costs to compete with Chinese brands,” said Larey Yoopensuk, chairman of the Federation of Thailand Automobile Workers. “They are now questioning whether staying in Thailand is still worthwhile.”

Advertisement

Thailand’s government — which wants 30% of the cars it produces to be electric by 2030 — sees Chinese investment as a crucial piece of the future of its auto industry, which now accounts for 800,000 jobs and 10% of the country’s GDP.

The paradigm shift has become a source of anxiety for Thai auto workers, who have long helped produce Japanese cars and the parts that go into them, including exhaust pipes, brakes and doors. Even if Chinese factories replace Japanese ones, Yoopensuk worried that there may not be a place for him or his colleagues in the new order.

One reason is that Chinese companies in Thailand have historically been intolerant of labor unions.

“Over the past decade, this industry has been booming, with unionized workers achieving better living conditions and high incomes,” said Yoopensuk, who has worked in auto manufacturing for 35 years. “If forced out, many workers — particularly older ones — may struggle to find jobs elsewhere.”

He was also concerned that Chinese EV manufacturers would use more automation and favor immigrants from China and Vietnam over Thai workers when hiring.

Advertisement

“This is an issue we’re pushing back against, encouraging these companies to also create employment opportunities here,” he said.

China’s foray into Thailand’s auto industry could herald what’s to come in other parts of the world, as EV adoption grows and Chinese brands go global. Last year, the Chinese behemoth BYD, which opened a factory in Thailand this summer, briefly surpassed Tesla in global sales.

“I don’t think there is any real precedent where those Chinese EV manufacturers are reshaping the industrial landscape in another country,” said David Williams, an expert on labor standards and supply chains in Asia for the International Labor Organization.

Thailand exports just over two-thirds of the cars it makes, with the biggest share going to Australia followed by Saudi Arabia, the Philippines and Vietnam.

Its most important market is domestic, and the news has been dismal. Total passenger car sales in Thailand fell 23% through September compared to the same period last year. Experts blamed rising household debt and increasingly stringent rules for securing auto loans.

Advertisement

Electric cars — nearly all of them Chinese — were the one bright spot, with sales up 11%.

Gasoline-powered cars still make up more than 90% of all sales in Thailand, but that is expected to fall as the government continues its push for EVs with subsidies for buyers and manufacturers.

BYD said its new plant would eventually generate about 10,000 jobs and produce 150,000 vehicles a year. When the company launched in Thailand, its distributor offered steep discounts on several models, bringing the cheapest models below $25,000.

That has intensified a price war that further threatens Japanese brands, which are fighting to keep up with cleaner cars of their own.

According to the Thai government, they have committed to investing more in local production of hybrids — which run on both battery motors and internal combustion engines — and electric pickup trucks. Honda started producing EVs in Thailand last December.

Advertisement

As gas-powered cars fall out of favor, some auto parts will be rendered obsolete, such as hydraulic-based steering systems and alternators.

The Thai Auto Parts Manufacturers Assn. has reportedly estimated that only about a dozen of the more than 600 auto parts makers in Thailand will be able to supply Chinese EVs.

Those that can transition to making parts for electric cars may still struggle to compete with Chinese rivals. Some auto parts suppliers have already shuttered as business has contracted.

Supat Ratanasirivilai, managing director of Thai Metal Aluminum, which produces aluminum-made parts for Japanese and American cars, said he has been negotiating with Chinese automakers since the start of the year.

But those talks have stalled since Chinese companies told him that his prices are 30-40% too high.

Advertisement

“We were hoping that when the Japanese carmakers’ production dropped, we may get some benefit from the Chinese carmakers,” he said. “But obviously they are not buying from the Thai suppliers.”

His company is pushing the Thai government to implement more protective measures for local workers, such as requiring EVs to be built with more locally sourced parts.

“The Thai government is really opening up everything for the Chinese carmakers. It has been very difficult for us,” he said. “I don’t know what’s to come next.”

Special correspondent Poypiti Amatatham in Bangkok contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

'Squid Game' was a surprise global smash. Will Season 2 be even bigger for Netflix?

Published

on

'Squid Game' was a surprise global smash. Will Season 2 be even bigger for Netflix?

It’s been more than three years since college student Justin Lin binge-watched the first season of Netflix’s “Squid Game” in two days. Now, he can’t wait until Season 2 launches on Netflix on Dec. 26.

Lin was so excited that he drove from the San Gabriel Valley to Hollywood to don a green tracksuit and compete against other fans for a seat at the U.S. premiere.

“It was really exciting — we were all on our heels. We were all on our toes,” Lin said after he watched the first episode of the new season.

The show, about debt-ridden people so desperate for money that they compete in deadly games, remains the most popular program on Netflix with more than 330 million views to date of its first season. In the Korean drama’s first 91 days on Netflix, “Squid Game” Season 1 captured 265.2 million views — the largest amount ever on the platform for any program.

Tom Nunan, a former network and studio executive who teaches at UCLA, thinks the second season could be even bigger.

Advertisement

“The first season was so beloved,” Nunan said. “Now you have something that’s an established title. People don’t have to rely on word of mouth. You’re going to deal with the existing fan base worldwide, along with everybody who wants to check it out for the first time.”

Netflix’s audience is also bigger compared to when “Squid Game” launched in September 2021. Back then, Netflix’s subscribers were nearly 214 million members in the third quarter of 2021. It has since grown 32% to more than 282 million globally.

“I have a lot of confidence that our members who watched Season 1 will definitely love Season 2, and those who actually have not been introduced will find Season 2 will also resonate with them as well,” said Minyoung Kim, Netflix’s vice president of content for Asia Pacific (not including India) in an interview last month.

Costumed “Squid Game” guards watch over the crowd at the premiere of the second season of the Netflix series.

(Chris Pizzello / Chris Pizzello/invision/ap)

Advertisement

The second season, a Golden Globe nominee, starts where “Squid Game” left off, with the main character on a mission to end the deadly games.

Netflix has leaned into its international programming, taking big bets on local stories that resonate in specific countries and regions. Sometimes those narratives become global hits, like “Squid Game.”

“Squid Game broke records and became our most popular show ever, proving that great stories can come from anywhere,” said Bela Bajaria, Netflix’s chief content officer, on stage at the “Squid Game” U.S. premiere earlier this month at the Egyptian Theatre in Hollywood. “The cultural impact was massive globally.”

The first season had a budget of $21.4 million or about $2.4 million an episode, according to Bloomberg. Netflix declined to comment on the budgets for either season, but it’s clear the filmmakers had more resources for the new one. Creator Hwang Dong-hyuk told the Hollywood Reporter: “This time, I was able to fully realize my creative vision, whether it was the set building or CGI. We didn’t have to compromise.”

Advertisement

Netflix has put significant marketing dollars behind the show, hosting fan events in cities that included Sydney and Paris. The streamer also has partnerships with major brands, including Puma, which created the tracksuits the contestants wear in Season 2 and are selling a version of it to fans. Other items include “Squid Game”-themed Crocs and a limited edition “Red Light: Green Light” beef jerky from Jack Link’s.

The company also rolled out a multiplayer game, “Squid Game: Unleashed,” which is available to non-Netflix subscribers for a limited period of time. Netflix announced Monday that it will reward gamers who also tune in to the show, giving them cash or wild tokens in the game based on the number of episodes they watch of Season 2.

And of course, there are the legions of “Squid Game” fans sharing the hype.

“They’ve built a lot of anticipation for it and everyone’s ready for it,” said Jacqueline Yang, a 28-year-old content creator based in downtown L.A. who watched all of Season 1 in one day.

Earlier this month, 1,700 fans, including Yang, participated in a 4.56K run (a reference to Season 1’s main character, Player 456) that started at L.A. City College. They were given tracksuits similar to the ones on the show.

Advertisement

During the event, fans were asked to choose to run through one of three large shapes — a circle, a triangle or a square (the symbols that cover the faces of the masked guards overseeing the show’s games). Participants who chose the correct symbol could attend the screening.

Lin and a friend chose the triangle — the right choice, it turned out.

Yang also chose the triangle, but her mother was not so lucky. The family was separated as Yang’s mother competed in two subsequent games — “Red Light, Green Light” and the scratching of a lottery ticket — but failed.

And even though her mother left the premiere early (Yang’s boyfriend picked her up), she didn’t leave empty-handed; she took home the tracksuit.

“My mom is like, ‘I guess we have our Halloween costumes for this next year,’” Yang said.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

Rolling Starbucks strike grows to include workers at hundreds of shops

Published

on

Rolling Starbucks strike grows to include workers at hundreds of shops

A rolling strike of Starbucks baristas has grown since kicking off Friday to include about 300 of the coffee giant’s shops across the U.S., according to the union organizing the work stoppage.

The strike, set to end after Christmas Eve, seeks to pressure Starbucks during the busy holiday season to offer a better wage proposal over what would be a first contract for its workers. Employees also aim to push Starbucks to resolve outstanding unfair labor practice charges filed by workers in recent years.

Starbucks Workers United, the union that represents about 10,000 workers at a few hundred of the ubiquitous chain’s nearly 16,500 U.S. locations, said that baristas in Boston, Philadelphia, Portland and Tucson walked off the job Monday as part of a plan to grow the number of striking employees over the course of the five-day action. They joined baristas in Los Angeles, Chicago and Seattle who launched the strike and were followed by others in Denver, New York, St. Louis and other cities.

“My co-workers and I made the difficult decision to launch unfair labor practice strikes in hundreds of stores across the country because we know that investing in baristas is the only way to turn things around. These strikes are an initial show of strength, and we’re just getting started,” said Lauren Hollingsworth a barista from Ashland, Ore., in a news release from the union.

Advertisement

The union said the strike is the largest in Starbucks history. The final days before Christmas are traditionally some of Starbucks’ busiest customer traffic times.

Starbucks downplayed the significance of the strike, saying it would make little impact on its overall operations. “The vast majority of our stores (97-99%) will continue to operate and serve customers, and we expect a very limited impact to our overall operations,” said Sara Kelly, executive vice president and chief partner officer, in recently published blog post on Starbucks’ website about the strike.

On Monday, more than 60 store locations were forced to close amid the ongoing strike, the union said. And on Tuesday, Starbucks said 170 of its more than 10,000 company-operated stores in the United States did not open as planned.

The company has criticized the union, saying it “prematurely” ended bargaining sessions last week.

“It is disappointing they didn’t return to the table given the progress we’ve made to date,” the company said in a statement.

Advertisement

Initially, five stores in Southern California were involved in the strike including in Van Nuys, Santa Clarita, Highland Park and Anaheim, said Evelyn Zepeda, organizing director in California for Workers United. That number has expanded to include locations in downtown and elsewhere.

The work stoppages mark a major turning point for Starbucks Workers United, which formed in 2021 and steadily has made headway in its campaign to persuade baristas at Starbucks around the U.S. to join. Hopes that the two sides would be able to hammer out a deal had been high since February, when the company pledged publicly to work with the union and take a more neutral approach toward the drive to organize workers.

The conciliatory stance was an about-face for a company that previously had intensely resisted the campaign to organize its workers. Federal regulators found Starbucks repeatedly violated labor laws by disciplining and firing workers involved in unionizing activity, shutting down stores and stalling contract negotiations.

The National Labor Relations Board has conducted a total of 647 union elections at Starbucks stores, with 109 of them falling short, several others with challenged ballots and 528 currently with certified bargaining units, according to NLRB spokesperson Kayla Blado. In California, 66 stores have held union elections and 44 of them have had their bargaining units recognized by the labor board.

Blado said workers have filed more than 700 unfair labor charges against Starbucks, its subsidiary Siren Retail Corp., or its law firm Littler Mendelson, alleging a range of violations. The union has not filed any new charges against Starbucks since late February.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending