South Dakota
Gov. Larry Rhoden outlines policy priorities as early voting approaches in South Dakota
Gov. Larry Rhoden began his political career as a school board member. He then served as a state legislator and as Lieutenant Governor in the Kristi Noem administration.
Rhoden is one of four Republicans vying for the state’s top elected office. He stopped by the SDPB studios in Sioux Falls to lay out his policy priorities. He spoke to SDPB’s Lori Walsh.
Rhoden is one of four Republicans on the primary ballot. Early voting begins on April 17. The primary election is June 2.
Watch the full Republican primary debate online.
A transcript of the interview follows:
LARRY RHODEN
It’s pretty simple. You know, I’ve said that my goals, my priorities, my pillars are to keep South Dakota strong, safe, free and open for opportunity. That’s more than just soundbites. That’s how we work.
I’ve got a great team around me. I’ve got the lieutenant governor in the studio with me right now. That’s a big part of my administration — putting the right people on the bus with me.
We’ve accomplished a great deal in the last 15 months. If people choose to give me another four years, it will be more of that.
We will just work to get things done. Bring businesses to South Dakota, strengthen the businesses we have, remain a low regulation state. The first seven months after session last year, I was on my Open for Opportunities tour, and learned a great deal about what we’ve got going for us. We learned a great deal on how to expand on what we’ve already accomplished in the state. And we will continue to follow that track.
LORI WALSH
You were lieutenant governor When Kristi Noem was governor during the pandemic. So when you’re on the Open for Opportunties tour post-pandemic, when you’re governor, you’re getting to see some business leaders who have also been through the pandemic and are not only reflecting on what happened in their business during that time, but looking to the future.
What did you learn about the crisis leadership during the pandemic from those business owners a few years later?
LARRY RHODEN
Yeah, that’s a fascinating question, and it was really interesting to me because we were touring businesses that had moved here post-pandemic. And because of the way South Dakota — the Noem/Rhoden administration —handled keeping our state open, that was the incentive for a lot of new business to move here.
So there was a mix of (new businesses) and a mix of old businesses that have been here for generations. It really gave me a kind of a new perspective on how much we have going for the state and also how much we take for granted.
I learned a great deal just by listening to the people. I told a few stories of policies that we learned about during that those tours that we went on to address at the federal level and found relief for businesses just by bringing them to … the Trump administration was just taking, control, and so we found that pretty valuable … to take things we learned from the business owners and actually implement change because of it.
LORI WALSH
It was an unprecedented time. Was there anything that you look back on five or six years later that you think, “We should have done that too. Or, we should have done that instead.”
LARRY RHODEN
You know, not really. When I look back on that, I mean, when we were going through it, it’s hard, it’s really hard to describe what it was like. And Tony (Venhuizen) was chief of staff for Kristi Noem at that time. So he was a big part of that. And, I think he would agree, just the unknown going through that.
What I’ve said, looking back, was that there were 49 governors who were making decisions based in fear, and one governor that was making decisions based on fact and then standing her ground.
But that wasn’t easy. Because some of the talking heads were trying to convince us that we were going to kill half our population if we made the wrong decisions. You kind of lay awake at night wondering if you were making the right decisions and, in history, looking back, she made the right decisions.
We made the right decisions.
LORI WALSH
And lot of people did die, thousands of South Dakotans died. And that’s something to reflect on too. How do you think about those lives today?
LARRY RHODEN
Well, obviously every life is precious. And you can never make light or discount the loss of life. But the statistics prove that we weren’t any worse off than we would have (been) if we would have closed our state down like other states had.
So I think the statistics bear out that we made the right decisions. We came through Covid in a lot better shape from the education perspective and from the disruption in our children’s lives. You know, our kids got back into the class or got back on track with their education a lot faster than they did in many other states.
LORI WALSH
One of the things I think I’m getting at is the weight of leadership. The role of governor can be a place to have big ideas and think about legacy and even power and influence. But it is also very consequential.
And you’ve been through that. And if people elect you, you’ll have another natural disaster, for example, or another crisis for South Dakotans.
How do you show up for your neighbors as governor?
LARRY RHODEN
Well, you know, for me, I’ve lived it. I grew up on a ranch in western South Dakota, and that’s just the way we live our lives.
When we had winter storm Atlas, we showed up for the neighbors and we took on the responsibility for others and helped our neighbors, looked out for them. And we learned that through Covid.
I’ve learned even last year as governor that there is a lot of weight on your shoulders. I surrounded myself with people that are like-minded, that are people of integrity and they’re wise and they give good counsel.
But the decision’s mine.
I think growing up on a ranch and running a ranch or running your own business also provides the background for making those decisions and a foundation for making decisions.
And we’ve accomplished some pretty significant things in the last year, especially with the legislature that we had acquired. There were a lot of, like I’ve said, a lot of new members and a lot of, you know, just disarray.
But, one of the cornerstones of my administration was civility. And I think that more than anything probably gives me a leg up on the other candidates, because I’ve had a lot of experience at dealing with legislators and people in different leadership positions all the way back to my military career.
My wife reminded me that when I was in basic training, I was the chosen trainee leader of my basic company in basic training. And, all that is part of who I am as far as learning about leadership.
And one of the primary advantages of being a good leader is knowing how to work with people and build relationships.
I think that’s what we saw in our legislature. I was a lot more hands on and a lot more proactive than other governors. I was on the third floor talking to legislators having them to my office to visit about their concerns. I think that’s what we need in the state is a leader that will lead by example and promote civility.
LORI WALSH
You mentioned surrounding yourself with like-minded people who can give you wise counsel.
In what ways do you surround yourself with people who don’t think like you, who might have a different idea about what freedom or safety means than you?
In what ways do you listen to them?
LARRY RHODEN
Well, you know, that’s also an interesting question. And, you know, in my team, there are a lot of, a lot of differing views, and they come at it from different perspectives based on their life experience.
When I say like-minded, I’m talking about people with the core values that are like mine, you know, people of integrity and, and people that are focused on policy.
And I’ve said this many times to my team that we were going to focus on policy. Policy. Good policy makes good politics for the most part, and good politics does not necessarily make good policy.
And so, you know, that’s, that’s primary to the decisions we make is focusing on the policy of the issues.
That gets to be a lot more difficult, especially when even in the last few weeks and months, every decision I make is held under that microscope of whether or not it’s political or not.
That’s come up in just the last few days and some of the events I went to. I’ve been challenged by some of the other candidates whether it was politically motivated.
That’s rather irritating to me because it’s not true. I know in my heart of hearts that it’s not true, that that I am focused on doing my job.
And just because three other guys want my job doesn’t mean I’m going to stop doing mine. I’m going to continue with what I just said — focusing on policy and making wise decisions for the betterment of South Dakota. Dealing with the politics is secondary to that.
LORI WALSH
So for people who don’t know, one of those things is your use of the Future Fund and $2 million to Western Dakota Tech to bring a gunsmithing program. Some of your competitors …
LARRY RHODEN
It was actually 4 million.
LORI WALSH
Four million. Thank you. Four million dollars for a gunsmithing program. Help separate that because they’re saying that’s politics. You were using your platform to say: Look at me. I’m doing this thing.
You’re saying that’s good policy. Tell us why that’s a good policy to use the Future Fund in that way, to bring this program to Western Dakota Tech.
LARRY RHODEN
Certainly. Well, I said this the other day when that first came up: I can’t think of anything more sound than using Future Fund dollars to bring an industry like that, a gunsmithing school, to Western Dakota Tech.
We’re using that to pay for the equipment and other things to get that class from Colorado into South Dakota in Rapid City, where we have a statewide … the gun industry, firearms industry, has gotten bigger and bigger.
And so it’s a perfect fit for South Dakota, and it’s a perfect fit for Future Funds. Because that’s what they’re designed to do so we can help bolster our economic future for our state.
And so if you’re planting those kind of seeds in an industry that’s already blooming in South Dakota, that’s, I think, just common sense.
LORI WALSH
Is there a demand for gunsmiths? Like there’s a demand for plumbers, electricians, for example?
LARRY RHODEN
Absolutely. And, especially out in in the Rapid City area, in Sturgis. in Sturgis, the entire industrial part, I think, is probably, three fourths of the businesses in their industrial park are gun-related. They have the old Dakota Arms. It’s now … I can’t think of the name offhand. There are a number of gun businesses in the Sturgis area, ammunition producers in the Rapid City area. So, absolutely.
Not to mention the fact that we opened the Pete Lien and Sons shooting complex just a few months ago, and we’ve already had over 30,000, visits to that gun range so far. And that’s just in the last few months. And that’s more than we expected in the first year.
So, that was created, that part of that shooting complex because of our Second Amendment … you know, we’re the most Second Amendment friendly state in the nation. And we have a lot of gun enthusiasts. And by all means, I think there’s a huge demand for gunsmiths in South Dakota.
LORI WALSH
After July 1st, new legislation from this legislative session will change how the governor can use Future Fund dollars. With the decisions that you’ve made, with the Rapid City National Defense Area and with the gunsmithing program, will those match the requirements that you’ll be under on August 1st for example?
You see what I’m asking?
LARRY RHODEN
I do. I understand thoroughly. And the (answer) is absolutely.
But let’s be clear, after July 1st, they won’t change. What that statute did, you know, there was concern over some of the ways that Future Funds were used in the past, prior to my administration. And, so we wanted to clear that air early on in session.
And so I issued an executive order, basically saying this is my view and what my blueprint is going to look like for determining the appropriate uses for Future Funds. I issued that and the legislators looked at that, said, well, would you support this if this was in statute?
Well, absolutely. Yeah. If it’s the same criteria that I spelled out as what I’m going to self-regulate with as far as appropriate uses for Future Funds. And so that’s what they basically put in statute. And so there was no change, practically speaking, from the way I was already doing business and the way I’d committed to do business with the use of the Future Funds.
LORI WALSH
What’s your vision for South Dakota in the future? I know “strong, safe and free.” But say more about what we’ll look like 50 years from now. What are you laying the groundwork for?
LARRY RHODEN
You know, we have we’ve already taken steps that indicate what my vision for the state is.
Ag will always be king in South Dakota. We have such a vast amount of ground. And so we’ve developed that, but beyond that, we’ve also focused on value-added agriculture, and we’ve gained leaps and bounds in that. And we’ve gained leaps and bounds in expanding our economic potential through trade, foreign trade in the last three years.
And I’ve been a big part of that. And Tony’s been a big part of that. He’s now leading trade missions. And I was as lieutenant governor. We just laid out in the last State of the State address that the next big industry in South Dakota would be national defense. And that’s an extension of that vision.
And if you’re looking at big picture, big ideas, big ideas that fit South Dakota, well, nothing fills a bill, I think, better than national defense being our next big industry in South Dakota.
Food security is national security. So as a starting point, we own the bone on food security in South Dakota.
And, beyond that — industry. Ellsworth Air Force Base and the addition of the B-21 bombers that are coming, we already have that industry. That’s starting to blossom on its own, but we’re going to be a lot more coordinated in that. I just announced the South Dakota Defense Institute. And that’s another part of that vision. To get that going and to jumpstart that.
LORI WALSH
Connecting with that — and I don’t think I’m going out on a limb here — we’ve also seen a lot of South Dakotans say they didn’t want a pipeline cutting through their land. They didn’t want their kids to see their data centers as far as the eye can see from the bus window on the way to school in Deuel County, in Piedmont and in Meade County, they don’t want their kids breathing air from limestone mines.
This is also a state where people want to walk the land, swim in the rivers and lakes, breathe the clean air. What are you doing to protect the land, the scenery of South Dakota?
LARRY RHODEN
I think we’ve struck a great balance there. I look at what the Black Hills looked like when I was a kid and Whitewood Creek, think how far we’ve come in protecting our natural resources and, and even in the way we’ve applied government.
You know, there was some concern about combining the Department of Ag with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. But what we’ve seen, and what I’ve said all along — and I think I’ve been vindicated on that — is that our ag producers, especially these generationally owned farms and ranches, which are 90 plus percent of our ag operations, nobody has a more vested interest in protecting our natural resources than the generational farmers and ranchers that have taken care of that land forever.
We continue to be vigilant about guarding our natural resources, but I think we’ve struck a pretty good balance.
LORI WALSH
As we wrap up here, I’m wondering if there’s an issue you wanted to talk about yet, or if you just wanted to address voters who maybe still don’t know your name about who you are?
LARRY RHODEN
Well, I’m. I’m Larry Roden, born and raised on a ranch in western South Dakota. I think if I talked about things that people might not know about me, that maybe set me apart, there’s a few things that set me apart.
I’m the only candidate that’s served the nation in the armed forces. I was in the National Guard for six years.
And I have a long history of military service in my family. That makes a difference. I think I look at things differently, and even the service to my nation, I think, set me up for a better perspective on running a state. I’m the only candidate that’s made my living off the land in agriculture.
And I think that’s also important. And I’m a generational South Dakotan. My grandparents on both sides of my family were homesteaders out in the area that I live now. And so I’ve grown up with a heart of service. And I’ve served the state, I’ve served my community, I’ve served the nation.
I think that sets me up better than most of the other candidates. And I’ve done the job and I’ve proven by results. Everybody else has plans. I’ve demonstrated the results of building coalitions and getting the job done.
South Dakota
Work, housing and staffing: How South Dakota’s corrections chief aims to keep inmates from returning
SIOUX FALLS – South Dakota’s repeat offense rate for people who leave prison can return to the low point it saw a a dozen years ago, the state’s corrections secretary said Tuesday.
Nick Lamb, now six months into his role atop the Department of Corrections, laid out the agency’s plan Tuesday at the Correctional Rehabilitation Task Force at its meeting in Sioux Falls. The plan includes work release programs, residential housing for inmates and a top-to-bottom restructuring of how the department operates.
Recidivism measures how many inmates return to prison within three years of their release. The figure for South Dakota stood at
50%
in the most recent data, which was based on the performance of inmates released in 2021.
South Dakota’s lowest recidivism rate in the last two decades was 39% in 2014.
“We’ll get back there,” Lamb said Tuesday.
Lamb told reporters after the meeting he wants “to start getting in the business of closing prisons” during his tenure.
“Our population is too high for our state,” Lamb said. “We need to get our population down, but we’ve got to give the offenders the tools they need that they haven’t always had.”
Several recommendations presented on Tuesday, by Lamb and other criminal justice experts, will require more staff and funding.
State Rep. John Hughes, R-Sioux Falls, worries that the Legislature’s budget-setting committee will balk at new spending.
“My concern is that we put all these elaborate proposals together, then when we get to appropriations we’re going to hit the wall,” Hughes said.
Inmates return to work release
Under Lamb’s predecessor, Kellie Wasko, pay for inmate work performed outside the prison walls
was increased to minimum wage
. After that policy change, fewer communities and organizations contracted inmate workers for community service jobs.
Rep. Tim Reisch, R-Howard, said most of the roughly 250 minimum-security prisoners he oversaw during his tenure as corrections secretary participated in work release.
“They got up and they all had jobs. They were used to getting out of bed, going to work, getting in a habit of that,” Reisch said.
When he toured the prison last year, fewer than 20 were working, he said.
Lamb has cut inmate wages below minimum wage since he started.
“We reached out to a lot of these communities, basically asking if they need help,” Lamb said. “We lowered the wage, which upset some people, but we need them out working.”
This summer, inmates will work at Sioux Falls parks and at its regional landfill, and they’ll prepare the fairgrounds in Huron for the State Fairgrounds in August. They’ll also help out during Riverboat Days in Yankton, and pitch in on tournament preparation for the National Field Archery Association.
Statewide residential facilities planned
Lamb also wants to establish a residential corrections program. He shared a presentation showing how such a program
operated in Iowa
, where he served as deputy director of institutional operations for the Iowa Department of Corrections before his move to South Dakota.
In Iowa, most residential facilities were filled with people on probation, parole or work release. He envisions a similar program in South Dakota, with housing outside of traditional prison settings designed to help transition back into the community, but he hasn’t finalized details or a timeline.
“We’re going to try it,” Lamb said. “I’ll be honest, I haven’t talked to the lieutenant governor or anybody else about it, but we need to try it. It works.”
The program has been in Iowa for decades. Iowa’s three-year recidivism rate peaked at 38.9% in 2019 and has since fallen to 32.8%, based on the
latest data available
.
“I’m not trying to throw you a sales pitch,” Lamb said, but residential programming is “a good idea.”
Lamb said he doesn’t want to replace programs like the one run by the Sioux Falls-based nonprofit St. Francis House, but to add to it.
St. Francis House doesn’t cap how long residents can stay and limits rent to $250 a month. Lamb said a state-run program would include a time limit and higher rent.
A lack of “felon-friendly housing” is a major driver of recidivism, said Sioux Falls Mayor Paul TenHaken, who’s leaving his position soon after two terms in office. The problem won’t improve without government involvement, he added.
“If the state ever chooses to invest in St. Francis House programming, it’s money well spent,” TenHaken said.
Justice Center recommendations
The percentage of inmates who got rehabilitative programming increased from 27%to 44% between 2023 and 2025, according to a report presented Tuesday by the Council for State Governments Justice Center.
The national nonprofit was contracted to analyze the state’s prison system and help guide the task force’s work.
Despite the gains in programming, the group reported, 46% of inmates released in 2025 received none. Access was also limited by where inmates were held, due to space and staffing restrictions.
The justice center recommended several changes, including:
- Creating a rehabilitation and reentry division and hiring several new positions.
- Creating a centralized waitlist for programs.
- Streamlining the program catalog to reduce overlap and fill gaps.
- Sequencing programming to cover an inmate’s entire stay, rather than stacking programs in the last few months of their sentence.
- Creating a dedicated parole violation program track.
Many of those recommendations hinge on hiring and retaining adequate staff — one of the department’s most significant challenges, according to the group.
Sara Friedman, program director with the Justice Center, said her team consistently heard in interviews that the department tends to shift employees around when attempting new initiatives, rather than hiring. That creates gaps for inmates seeking programming.
Sometimes, for example, shifting staffing patterns will leave facilities without enough security staff to transport inmates to classrooms.
“Technically, you’re fully staffed, but you’re fully staffed so thinly that the moment one thing goes wrong, the waterfall effect is people are not getting their rehabilitative services,” Friedman said.
Lamb told South Dakota Searchlight after the presentation that he wasn’t surprised by the staffing recommendations. The department lacks adequate staff to backfill for sick or vacationing employees, he said, though he didn’t say how many more employees would need to be hired to address the issue.
The department is already working to create the new rehabilitation and reentry division and centralize its scheduling.
The task force plans to meet two more times before it’ll finalize its recommendations for the Legislature ahead of the next session, which starts in January.
— This story was originally published on southdakotasearchlight.com.
South Dakota
South Dakota Republicans reject censuring John Thune over stalled SAVE America Act
South Dakota Republican delegates rejected a push to censure Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) over the stalled SAVE America Act, exposing a fight within the GOP over how far the party should go to force through sweeping new voting restrictions.
South Dakota Republicans voted down a proposed censure of Thune at the state party convention Friday after a resolution accused him of blocking President Donald Trump’s election agenda.
The measure had advanced out of the party’s Resolutions Committee, but failed before the full convention.
The resolution targeted Thune for what it called “his failure in regards to the SAVE America Act,” a Republican-backed bill that would impose strict proof-of-citizenship and photo ID requirements to vote.
Voting rights advocates have warned the bill could block millions of eligible Americans from registering, especially people who do not have easy access to passports, birth certificates or documents matching their current names.
Trump has sharply escalated pressure on Republicans to pass the bill. This week, he abruptly canceled a planned signing ceremony for a bipartisan housing affordability bill, tying the unrelated legislation to his demand that Congress first pass the SAVE America Act.
“Today’s Housing News Conference and Signing is hereby cancelled until such time as we pass the desperately needed SAVE AMERICA ACT, which I consider to be a National Emergency,” Trump wrote.
The censure push reflects growing anger among Trump allies who want Senate Republicans to change or bypass filibuster rules to pass the bill. A filibuster is a Senate procedure that usually requires 60 votes to move most legislation forward. Republicans do not have those votes.
“We don’t have the votes, either to proceed to a talking filibuster nor to sustain one if we got one,” Thune said last week. “That’s just a function of math. There isn’t anything I can do about that.”
For pro-democracy advocates, the fight is not simply about Thune. It is about a broader Republican effort to turn Trump’s election denialism into federal policy. Noncitizen voting is already illegal and exceedingly rare.
But the SAVE America Act would use that false crisis to create new barriers for eligible voters.
The South Dakota vote shows the limits of MAGA pressure even in a deep-red state. Delegates were willing to debate punishing their own Senate majority leader, but ultimately rejected escalating the internal fight.
Still, the episode underscores how central voting restrictions have become to the Republican agenda ahead of the midterms.
South Dakota
17 Republican attorneys general, including South Dakota’s, sue California over plastics law
Seventeen Republican attorneys general, including South Dakota’s, have sued California over a state law that requires plastic packaging producers to move away from single-use plastics, alleging that the law will raise costs for consumers across the country.
Led by Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers and the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors, the
complaint
filed Monday in the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of California challenges California’s Plastics Act. Under the law, which took effect May 1, plastic packaging producers
must reduce single-use plastic
by 25% and ensure all packaging is recyclable or compostable by 2032.
Joining Hilgers in the lawsuit are the attorneys general of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and West Virginia. They say the law is an attempt by California “to impose its own policy preferences on the entire nation.”
The law “will cause steep and persistent price increases” on products used daily by consumers in other states, the plaintiffs argue.
South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley said in a news release that the California law “imposes unreasonable, burdensome requirements on businesses and consumers nationwide.”
The attorneys general also assert that the law violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution by interfering with interstate commerce, and that it improperly extends regulatory authority to a private organization. California appointed a nonprofit, the Circular Action Alliance, to help develop, administer and implement the law.
“Once again, California is trying to enact a policy that negatively impacts the rest of the country. If California goes unchecked, consumers will be forced to pay more for basic necessities,” Hilgers said in a news release. “Nebraska is continuing to fight for consumers against California’s overreach.”
Environmental advocacy groups also
sued
California earlier this month, alleging the new regulations “fall short” in meeting the state’s aims of reducing plastic packaging, and that they contain loopholes for producers.
— This story was originally published on southdakotasearchlight.com.
-
Kentucky34 seconds agoKentucky Arts Council's Celebrating the Black Experience Art Exhibit to visit NKY in November
-
Louisiana8 minutes agoPolls open for Louisiana runoff election | Everything you need to know
-
Maine10 minutes ago
Maine Marine Patrol launches newest, largest patrol vessel in its fleet
-
Maryland16 minutes agoOff-and-on weekend showers before intense heat builds in Maryland
-
Michigan23 minutes ago4-star WR recruit commits to SEC power over Michigan Football
-
Massachusetts25 minutes agoCould ‘Golden Girls’-style homesharing solve the state’s housing woes? – The Boston Globe
-
Minnesota31 minutes agoWho’s the greatest Minnesota high school athlete of all time? Vote now in ‘USA 250’ poll
-
Mississippi38 minutes ago‘Mississippi firsts’ from Neshoba County Fair