Indiana
The growing backlash to Indiana’s baby box empire
Indiana senators debate bill to ban abortion pills in the state
Indiana Senate advances bill allowing citizens to sue over abortion inducing drugs in a major shift for anti abortion efforts.
This article was originally published by Mirror Indy and is republished through our partnership with Free Press Indiana.
Monica Kelsey brought a baby box to the Indiana Statehouse.
Last fall, she joined lawmakers celebrating the 25th anniversary of the state’s Safe Haven Law, which allows parents to legally surrender their newborns to hospitals, police and firefighters.
Kelsey, a former paramedic, created the boxes, purported to give a desperate mother more anonymity: She can place her baby inside and walk away forever.
When the door opens, alarms trigger first responders, who collect the baby. Kelsey got the idea while promoting abstinence on a 2013 trip to South Africa. The work is personal: Kelsey said her mother was raped as a teenager and left her at an Ohio hospital after giving birth.
“I was one of those kids,” Kelsey, 52, said. “The unwanted kid everybody talks about.”
Now, a facility in her hometown of Woodburn in northeast Indiana produces almost all of the nation’s baby boxes. Her nonprofit, Safe Haven Baby Boxes, is a growing empire with 1.2 million followers on TikTok, a merch line and more than $4.4 million in revenue reported in 2024.
“These boxes are more than plastic and technology,” Kelsey told the crowd gathered Nov. 18 at the Indiana Statehouse. “They are mercy made tangible.”
Republican Gov. Mike Braun and other top state leaders listened from the front row. Before the event began, they bowed their heads as a preacher spoke: “We pray that every voice that would rise up against life in this state would be brought low.”
After Indiana passed a near-total abortion ban in 2022, Republican lawmakers have championed baby boxes as a solution for crisis pregnancies and infant abandonment. Churches, anti-abortion groups and $1 million allocated by the Indiana legislature have covered the costs to install some of the state’s boxes in the walls of fire departments and hospitals — even as officials at the Indiana Department of Health raised safety concerns.
After a baby is surrendered in the boxes, first responders complete a medical evaluation. Then, the infant goes into the custody of the Department of Child Services or a licensed child-placing agency.
Safe Haven Laws are stricter than regular adoptions: Birth parents have about 15 days to petition a court to get their child back — otherwise, their legal rights are terminated. Most of the babies placed in boxes grow up without knowing who surrendered them — or why.
Indiana now has about 150 baby boxes — more than a fourth of the boxes installed across the country. Nine are in Indianapolis. They’re expensive, but rarely used.
The price for one box is roughly $22,000 in installation costs, maintenance and annual fees. In the last decade, Kelsey’s nonprofit said at least 30 babies have been surrendered in Indiana via the boxes. That amounts to about three cases a year.
“When this baby is born, they’re going to go in a dumpster or one of our boxes,” Kelsey told Mirror Indy. “I think we can all agree a baby does not deserve to be in a dumpster.”
Critics ask for FDA approval
Messages like this have proven successful for Kelsey’s nonprofit.
Tax records show how donations powered her spending in 2024: $116,000 on travel, including trips for box blessing ceremonies across the country; more than $200,000 to cover her and her husband’s salaries; and a $382,000 advertising budget. (In an email, Kelsey said her salary is on-par with other nonprofit CEOs and the marketing is “life-saving awareness.”)
But she’s also increasingly playing defense. As the money flows in, backlash is growing.
It crystallized in 2024, when nearly 100 academics, child welfare advocates and legislators sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. They asked the agency to regulate baby boxes.
The Food and Drug Administration does not consider the boxes to be medical devices — a label that regulates everything from electronic toothbrushes to bandages.
That’s concerning to Lori Bruce, a bioethicist from Yale University who signed the letter. The boxes, she said, have heating and cooling elements and alarms that could fail.
“It is unsettling that the federal government declined to regulate devices that have so many implications for the safety and wellbeing of infants,” Bruce said. “A bassinet is a medical device. A baby box is a bassinet with alarms, electricity and HVAC.”
In an email, Kelsey said her product has internal safety protocols, testing requirements and mandatory daily checks from first responders. “They are not medical devices,” she wrote. “They are safety devices designed to facilitate legal custody transfer.”
Still, the controversy continues, with more than 400 boxes installed across the country.
In Maryland, medical groups pushed back on legislation approving the boxes, citing safety concerns. In Nebraska, a lawmaker successfully opposed baby boxes, which were ultimately written out of legislation. The devices, Sen. Carol Blood said, could “unknowingly provide concealment for crimes such as rape, incest or human trafficking.”
She also pointed out financial gain for nonprofits such as Kelsey’s: “We’re opening the doors for these grifters to come to Nebraska.”
And in Indiana, the fight over boxes was just as contentious a decade ago. But ultimately, state health officials lost.
Kelsey’s attorney at the time was James Bopp Jr., a prominent conservative lawyer who has led efforts to restrict abortion.
“Freedom is the norm, not government regulation,” Bopp Jr. said in 2016. “We do not think there is any state or federal law that regulates baby boxes, so there are no federal bureaucrats to deal with.”
‘No endorsement’ from Indiana Department of Health
In 2015, legislators asked a commission of state leaders to develop recommendations for safety protocols and standards for baby boxes.
Dr. Jerome Adams, a member and the commissioner of the Indiana Department of Health at the time, didn’t approve of the boxes. Neither did the commission’s Task Force on Infant Mortality and Child Health, a group made up of doctors and child welfare officials.
“There is simply no evidence to suggest the use of a baby box is a safe and prudent way to surrender a child,” Adams said in a joint 2016 statement with the Indiana Department of Child Services.
Instead, both agencies encouraged parents to surrender babies in-person. That’s a stance echoed by traditional Safe Haven groups, who say direct handoffs help mothers get immediate medical care and mental health support.
Emails obtained by Mirror Indy show Kelsey fighting back.
The state health department’s “accusations and mischaracterizations” about the safety of baby boxes, Kelsey wrote in a June 2016 email to agency leadership, are “unwarranted, ignorant (in the purest meaning of the word) and just plain wrong.”
Another section, directed at Adams: “YOU ARE NOT INTERESTED IN COMING TOGETHER AND WORKING WITH SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES FOR THE BETTERMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN THIS STATE.”
Ultimately, Kelsey installed the boxes — without the support of the Indiana Department of Health and Department of Child Services. And in 2017, legislators supported her mission by expanding the state’s Safe Haven Law to include baby boxes.
When Adams opposed the devices in 2016, Kelsey said, baby boxes were still new: “That does not mean they were inherently unsafe. Since then Indiana law has changed and boxes have operated without injury or death.”
Adams, reached by Mirror Indy via email, said he still has safety concerns all these years later. Those include possible delays in medical care for the surrendered baby and no “standardized oversight” of the boxes.
“As for why Indiana now has so many baby boxes, that didn’t then and doesn’t now reflect a state health department endorsement,” said Adams, who later became the U.S. Surgeon General under President Trump in 2017. “Laws changed and local entities were allowed to install them. The health department didn’t have the authority to stop that, even if not leading or recommending it as an evidence-based approach.”
See Dr. Jerome Adams’ full 2026 statement to Mirror Indy
The Indiana Department of Health, which has new leadership under Dr. Lindsay Weaver, did not answer questions about previous safety concerns. “We can’t speculate about past conversations regarding safe haven boxes,” a spokesperson wrote in a December 2025 email.
Adams, for his part, championed solutions outside of the boxes: improving awareness of the Safe Haven Law, expanding health care access and support for moms in crisis.
“Those approaches are backed by data,” he wrote, and “address why people feel like they have no options in the first place.”
‘Just an escape hatch’
In Indianapolis, one hospital has a baby box.
Franciscan Health installed the device in 2024. Melanie Boosey, the hospital’s manager of labor and delivery, started raising donations in the wake of Indiana’s near-total abortion ban. Even if the box isn’t used often, she said, it’s there as a last resort.
“I know the argument that it shouldn’t be a policy to just build baby boxes everywhere,” Boosey said. “But when working within the construct of my state law and a Catholic institution, I felt like this was something we could do.”
Other doctors said the boxes distract from the very issues that create crisis pregnancies: poverty, child care access and limited prenatal care.
“Putting an infant in a box and pretending it’s a win is a bit problematic,” said Dr. Elizabeth Ferries-Rowe, an OB-GYN at Eskenazi Health. “It’s just an escape hatch from the problems the state created.”
Alternate programs exist in Indianapolis. The BIRTH Fund gives up to $20K to pregnant women living in the city’s worst zip codes for infant mortality — no strings attached. Research shows financial pressure is a key reason people give up their children.
“We’re working toward long-term solutions that would make a baby box obsolete,” said Benjamin Tapper, the city’s chief diversity and equity officer who helped set up the fund in Indianapolis.
In an email, Kelsey said she supports policies that help with economic stability, housing and health care access — and that her nonprofit’s hotline connects parents to these resources.
“However, these programs do not address acute crisis moments, which are the circumstances in which unsafe abandonment occurs,” she wrote. “A baby box is not a substitute for economic policy — it is an emergency intervention.”
That sentiment rings true for the Barkman family, who adopted a baby in 2020 after he was placed in the box at Decatur Township Fire Station 74. The northside couple, who struggled with infertility, had long prayed for a child.
“Surrendering your child is one of the most selfless acts and biggest showing of love,” Kimberly Barkman told Mirror Indy. “We’re so grateful to Samuel’s mom for doing that.”
Sometimes, the little boy visits fire stations with his parents. “I was in there?” his mom remembers him asking once, pointing at the box.
In the moment, she nodded. Barkman knows she’ll be fielding questions for years to come. But she’s glad he’s alive and asking.
“We don’t want infants abandoned,” Barkman said. “We don’t want Brookside Park to happen again.”
Babyland
On Sept. 1, 2025, remains were found in the Indianapolis eastside park. Some Safe Haven advocates claimed it was the state’s first fatal infant abandonment in more than a decade.
Kelsey talked about the mother on TikTok. “If she would have just utilized the Safe Haven law, none of this would be happening,” Kelsey said. “A perfectly healthy little girl, just discarded like trash.”
Mirror Indy asked the Marion County Coroner if the death occurred in-utero or after birth, but did not receive an answer. The coroner’s office said the cause and manner of death are undetermined.
When Safe Haven fails, someone else enters the fold: Linda Znachko, the founder of He Knows Your Name, a local ministry honoring the lives of abandoned and unclaimed babies.
She was by Kelsey’s side at the Indiana Statehouse for the November Safe Haven anniversary event. The two met in 2015 at a funeral for an abandoned baby. “That’s a problem,” Kelsey had said, pointing at the little casket going into the ground. “I have the solution.”
A decade later, Znachko is still pleading for parents to use the boxes.
“Baby Haven was found 15 minutes away from two baby boxes,” she told the crowd, repeating the name she gave the remains found at Brookside Park. “Let this be the day Indiana says no more.”
Half a month later, Znachko’s Mercedes-Benz weaved through Washington Park East Cemetery, stopping at a section still covered in snow. A blue sign read, “Babyland.”
Here, the debates over politics and policies go silent.
Znachko got out of her car and placed flowers on more than 50 graves. A small number were for infants abandoned in public throughout the years; others were left unclaimed at funeral homes or hospitals.
She personally buried many of them and often chooses their names in death. Most come from the Bible.
“These moms are tragically desperate, gripped by fear and unfortunately alone,” Znachko said. A woman with family and support, she continued, would not abandon a child: “That is not the heart of a mother.”
Sometimes, she tires of the questions and narratives about these tragedies.
“It’s really important to shift our focus from the homeless mom story or the addicted mom story or the dumpster story,” Znachko said. “These babies are laid to rest, and I believe they’re hanging out in heaven together.”
The newest plaque said “Baby Haven.” Roses from the October funeral were brown and dying. But one carnation, red against the snow, was still fresh.
Mirror Indy, a nonprofit newsroom, is funded through grants and donations from individuals, foundations and organizations.
Mirror Indy reporter Mary Claire Molloy covers health. Reach her at 317-721-7648 or email maryclaire.molloy@mirrorindy.org. Follow her on X @mcmolloy7.
Indiana
Indiana mother charged with neglect after baby’s co-sleeping death
INDIANAPOLIS (WKRC) — An Indianapolis mother is now facing criminal charges after her 2-month-old baby died in an apparent improper co-sleeping environment, according to investigators.
According to a probable cause affidavit obtained by FOX 59/CBS 4, police were called to an area hospital on Sept. 19, 2024, following the death of 27-year-old Brooklyn Davis’ son. The boy had been found unresponsive in his family’s home early that morning, and Davis attempted CPR before he was rushed to the hospital.
The affidavit says the boy had been sleeping on Davis’ bed with his 6-year-old brother. Davis later showed investigators a video showing the baby sleeping chest down on the 6-year-old’s chest.
An autopsy concluded the baby’s cause of death was “sudden explained death of an infant” with an intrinsic factor, which included being “placed to sleep in a queen-sized mattress being shared with a 6-year-old sibling, along with numerous blankets and other miscellaneous items; discovered unresponsive in a prone position with his face turned to the side and partially covered with a blanket.”
A report from the Department of Child Services (DCS) indicated the boy had no known health issues and that Davis ran an FSSA-licensed day care and has “extensive training on child care and safe sleeping environments.”
Davis had been known to DCS prior to the baby’s death. The boy had been born marijuana-positive and, on July 2, 2024, Davis had reportedly signed a “Safe Sleep Safety Plan,” acknowledging she understood that the safest places for her baby to sleep were in a crib, pack-and-play or bassinet and warned that co-sleeping places the baby at risk of suffocation and sleeping areas should be kept free of blankets, pillows and other items. The plan also included a provision that Davis not use marijuana while caring for her children, but she told investigators during an interview that, the morning of her baby’s death, she had gone downstairs to smoke marijuana and left the children alone upstairs.
Davis’ two other children were removed from the home, and interviews with them revealed that co-sleeping with the infant happened often.
Investigators say they attempted to contact Davis several times after talking to her children.
“She called me on February 18, 2025, and said she didn’t do anything wrong, her baby died of SIDS,” the detective wrote in the affidavit. “Brooklyn never came in for an additional interview.”
Court records indicate the case was filed in March 2026. Davis was booked into jail on April 1 on three counts of neglect of a dependent. An initial hearing was held on April 7, and a bail review hearing is planned for Monday.
Indiana
Projecting the Indiana Fever’s 2026 Starting Lineup
The start of training camp officially marks the beginning of the 2026 WNBA season. The Indiana Fever were fairly quiet during free agency after successfully retaining most of their top-tier talent such as Kelsey Mitchell, Aliyah Boston, Lexie Hull, and Sophie Cunningham. Though they still managed to add a few solid pieces to further stack their depth.
Last season the Fever made an impressive postseason run despite facing multiple injuries, particularly in the backcourt. The front office clearly prioritized guard depth as a result, as well as looking to upgrade at the power forward position.
The Fever brass aimed to shore up any defensive deficiencies on the perimeter in the draft by adding guard Raven Johnson out of South Carolina, who brings a reputation as a defensive stopper. As for bolstering the frontcourt, to play alongside, and even provide some relief for Aliyah Boston, newly acquired 6-foot-4 Monique Billings and veteran forward Myisha Hines-Allen fit the bill. Indiana also picked up another solid player in Tyasha Harris at the guard position to provide backcourt depth and relieve pressure on Kelsey Mitchell and Caitlin Clark.
As for the starting lineup, here’s who the Indiana Fever are projected to run with:
Caitlin Clark, Guard
This comes as no surprise, but Clark will look to lead the way for the Fever in one of the two starting guard roles. Coming off of a season riddled with injuries, her return is highly anticipated. In true Clark fashion, she showed positive signs of production during the FIBA World Cup qualifiers where she led Team USA in assists and points.
Clark is expected to return to form in 2026. She provides speed in transition, is a deep threat from beyond the arc, and is elite at setting up her teammates. The only thing standing in the way of a productive season for Clark is remaining healthy for the duration of the season.
Kelsey Mitchell, Guard
Re-signing Kelsey Mitchell was yet again the main offseason priority for the Fever and they did just that. Coming off of a career year, Mitchell will be a key component in the Fever reaching a championship. She averaged 20.2 points per game last season and carried the team on her back during Clark’s absence.
As a premier scoring guard, she complements Clark’s game well and when the two are on the floor together, they’re easily the most explosive backcourt in the entire WNBA. Mitchell has exceptional speed and is a gifted isolation scorer. Her ability to quickly cut and drive to the rim makes her a nightmare for opposing teams to defend and contributed to her earning a 2025 All-WNBA First Team selection.
Mitchell is one of the most dangerous clutch situation players in the league making her a stellar weapon for the Fever.
Lexie Hull, Forward
Entering her fifth WNBA season, all with the Fever, no other player on the roster has grown as much as Lexie Hull. Her steady development has made her a key piece and earned her a starting role in the rotation as last season progressed. Listed as a guard, her defense and versatility has allowed her to frequently fill the role of small forward. She impacts the game on both ends of the floor and saw career highs in 2025 in points per game (7.2), rebounds per game (4.3), assists per game (1.8) and steals per game (1.2).
Her impactful instincts even contributed to her being near the top of the WNBA in offensive fouls drawn last season. With her high-percentage shooting from beyond the arc, solid perimeter defense, and elite hustle, Hull fills the wing role nicely for the Fever.
Monique Billings, Forward
Heading into the 2026 season, the Fever desperately needed to add talented size up front to complement Aliyah Boston’s skill set. With the departure of veteran Natasha Howard in free agency, the Fever acquired their likely next starting power forward in Monique Billings.
Billings is a strong finisher around the basket, has soft hands, runs the floor well, and is adept at screening for guards. She can also defend multiple positions and is a more than capable rebounder. Billings checks all of the boxes of a needed component for Indiana.
Aliyah Boston, Center
After making WNBA history with a record contract, Aliyah Boston looks to continue to elevate her game. Boston has quickly ascended as one of the league’s biggest threats in the middle of the floor. What makes this season even more promising for Boston is the dominant performances she put on display during Unrivaled.
She’s in peak physical shape, faster and has worked on her three-point shooting – an area she committed herself to improving on in the offseason. The three-time All-Star has already established herself as a force on the block due to her combination of size and footwork. Her step-through moves have increased her efficiency in scoring under the basket.
Boston seems poised to have the best season of her career in 2026.
Follow
Indiana
An Indiana district turned to voters to fund more preschool seats. Here’s what happened next.
(CHALKBEAT INDIANA) — When Pete Hinnefeld and his wife started looking for a preschool for their daughter, they hoped to send her to the same school her brother attended, which was just down the road from their house and offered Spanish-language immersion.
To do this for Lydia, then age 3, they were prepared to pay the $600 monthly cost.
But after voters approved a property tax referendum to fund early learning for children living within the Monroe County Community School Corporation, the family’s preschool bill was cut by more than half. Nearby preschool cut down time spent commuting to their parents’ house for babysitting, and helped Lydia build social skills.
The family are one of hundreds now benefitting from the 2023 referendum, which has more than doubled the number of children attending 3- and 4-year-old preschools in the district.
“For us, this is why you pay taxes,” Hinnefeld said. “It’s important for young kids to have access to school and if parents need to work, it’s an opportunity to let them work.”
The referendum put forward by the district, located in Bloomington, is a first in the state, offering all families tuition support on a sliding scale based on income, no matter whether children attend a district preschool or a partner provider.
It represents a local solution to problems with accessing and affording early learning that have left thousands of Indiana families waiting for help. Indiana in December 2024 froze its Child Care and Development Fund, or CCDF, and On My Way Pre-K dollars, which provide funding for early learning for income-eligible households.
A $200 million funding increase for CCDF approved by the State Budget Committee this week will allow Indiana to begin issuing vouchers againin May to around 14,000 more children, for a total enrollment of around 57,000. Those funds will last around one year.
Still, around 20,000 children will remain on the waitlist, and families may have fewer options for where to use their vouchers as hundreds of providers have closed since the freeze was announced, according to early learning advocates in the state. In a recent survey of early childhood educators in Indiana — which includes those working in a variety of settings — 90% of respondents said families are struggling to pay tuition.
A statewide universal preschool program is unlikely, Republican leaders have said. Instead, a legislative proposal this year would have let cities and counties — not just school districts — ask voters to fund preschool seats. It failed to get traction, but its advocates expect it to return.
The political climate isn’t especially promising for local tax increases: A new Indiana law has placed caps on property tax revenue that are already affecting local budgets. Lawmakers also recently restricted when schools can place referendums on the ballot.
Still, a new local revenue stream could be a boon in some Indiana communities, such as those with high demand for preschool, existing programs, and high social cohesion, said Sam Snideman, vice president of government relations for United Way of Central Indiana.
“There are going to be communities where this makes a ton of sense,” Snideman said. “The increasing challenge for an entity that goes before the public for a referendum is making a very clear value case. What is the common good and what is in the community interest is very important.”
School district’s pre-K enrollment doubles after referendum
Before Monroe schools brought the referendum request to voters, the district conducted a study that showed there were not enough early learning seats to serve children in the community, said Timothy Dowling, director of early learning and enrollment at Monroe schools. And families couldn’t always afford the seats that were available.
But the district also knew that research links quality early learning improved later academic outcomes, Dowling said.
“We wanted to do everything we can to help our students get the benefit of early learning, because we know it pays off in huge dividends,” Dowling said.
The referendum equated to around a $50 increase yearly for a home with an assessed value of $250,000, according to the district website, and also paid for instructional supplies for K-12 students. It passed with 55% of the vote; Dowling said the community study and transparency about how the referendum funds would be used were key to its success.
As a result of the successful referendum, all families in the district qualify for at least $4,000 in tuition assistance for preschool for 4-year-olds, whether their children attend a district school or at one of seven community providers.
Around 76% students in the district’s program attend for free based on their family’s income, Dowling said. Families in the lowest income tier who send their children to community providers receive $8,000 in tuition assistance.
The program also offers tuition assistance for 3-year-old preschool based on income and where the student attends school. For families making 225% or less of the federal poverty level, preschool is free at district programs. Often those families struggled the most to afford child care, even when state child care vouchers were available, Dowling said.
In 2024-25, the year after the referendum passed, the number of 4-year-olds attending preschool doubled from 184 to 378, with 64 of those children attending preschool at outside centers. This year, the district expanded preschool for 3-year-olds, based on the timeline laid out in the referendum. Enrollment jumped from 78 to 123, with another 33 students attending community child care centers, Dowling said.
With multiple types of providers, families have options, said Kelly Sipes, the executive director for Penny Lane Childcare Centers, which is a partner provider with the district. Those who need transportation might choose a district-run preschool, she said, but those who need year-round care during school holidays can choose a center like Penny Lane instead.
Her centers are usually at capacity, Sipes said, and child care needs in the community persist. When CCDF funding was cut, some of her families turned to the funding from the district instead.
“It’s awesome for the families,” Sipes said. “We should be all in this together as a community.”
Pitching child care: ‘We live in a society’
Replicating referendum-funded preschool might work well in communities where school-based providers already exist, and where there’s a sufficient tax base and steady demand for child care, Snideman said. It would also be an incentive to attract working families.
But it could be a harder sell in rural districts, where there are fewer families and less demand.
Generally, school referendums pass in districts that are wealthier, and in areas with less farmland, said Larry DeBoer, a Purdue University professor emeritus of agricultural economics, who has studied school referendums in depth.One of the biggest predictors of success is whether a school district has tried to pass a referendum before — even if they’ve failed, a second referendum is more likely to pass, DeBoer said.
Monroe schools had previously passed an operating referendum the year before its 2023 preschool referendum. As a county, Monroe has a slightly lower per-person income than Indiana as a whole, and has more students than the small and medium-sized districts most likely to propose successful ballot measures. It’s home to Indiana University, and tends to vote Democratic in a largely conservative state.
A legislative proposal this year, HB 1430, would have given the power to levy preschool referendums to counties and cities, potentially casting a wider net for both family demand and child care providers.
The bill did not receive a hearing, in part because Indiana legislative leaders are usually reluctant to consider bills with a fiscal impact in even-numbered years where they don’t pass a state budget. And the most recent state budget passed in 2025 was tight, with cuts to spending and programs due to a revenue shortfall.
The bill’s author, Rep. Blake Johnson, a Democrat, said that conversations about the bill have been fruitful, and that he expects the idea to return in a future session.
Given budget concerns, a locally funded solution that communities can tailor to their own needs may be more successful than a statewide one, said Patrick McAlister, who leads the Preschool Choice Alliance, a statewide group.
“This is an economic development need. Here’s the tool and the option to exercise it or not,” Johnson said.
A successful referendum would be a boon to working parents who struggle to afford the cost of early learning, said McAlister, who used to be the director of the Indianapolis Mayor’s Office of Education Innovation. But even for non-parents, a preschool referendum could have a positive impact on property values and in other ways, McAlister said.
Ultimately, it would be one part of an “all and above strategy” addressing care for children from birth to age 2.
“We live in a society,” McAlister said. “There are certain things we hold true and caring for children is a value many people share.”
Aleksandra Appleton covers Indiana education policy and writes about K-12 schools across the state. Contact her at aappleton@chalkbeat.org.
-
Florida4 minutes agoFlorida Lottery Fantasy 5, Cash Pop results for April 19, 2026
-
Georgia10 minutes ago
Gaudette & Patel Pitch Past No. 3 UNC, 5-2
-
Hawaii16 minutes agoA Deep Dive into Hawai‘i’s Shell Jewelry Industry – Hawaii Business Magazine
-
Idaho22 minutes ago
Idaho Lottery results: See winning numbers for Pick 3, Pick 4 on April 19, 2026
-
Illinois28 minutes agoMultiple people shot in Centralia, Illinois: REPORT
-
Indiana34 minutes agoIndiana mother charged with neglect after baby’s co-sleeping death
-
Iowa40 minutes agoFormer Iowa State star, All-American Audi Crooks announces transfer destination
-
Kansas46 minutes agoTyler Reddick needs OT at Kansas to claim fifth win of NASCAR season