Connect with us

Northeast

Karen Read's lawyers identify exact moment prosecution 'lost the case' in murder trial

Published

on

Karen Read's lawyers identify exact moment prosecution 'lost the case' in murder trial

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Karen Read’s attorneys revealed over the weekend the turning point at trial that they believe tanked special prosecutor Hank Brennan’s credibility in front of the jury.

“My immediate thought was, I think he just lost the case,” Read attorney David Yannetti told Canadian lawyer and podcaster Ian Runkle over the weekend. “My immediate thought was that was the biggest gift we could’ve been handed in this trial. I wasn’t concerned about, was it intentional? Was it an accident? Who knew about it? Etc. The optics were terrible. It allowed Alan [Jackson], in closing argument to sort of rattle off a litany of stuff that was suspect.”

He was talking about a misstep Brennan made while questioning defense expert Dr. Daniel Wolfe about holes in the victim’s sweatshirt – holes that a Massachusetts State Police Crime Lab technician put there. 

BOSTON COP WOULD HAVE ‘TAKEN A BULLET’ FOR KAREN READ’S OFFICER BOYFRIEND FOUND DEAD ON HIS PROPERTY

Advertisement

Karen Read gestures to supporters after she was found not guilty of second-degree murder on Wednesday, June 18, 2025 in Dedham, Massachusetts. (AP Photo/Josh Reynolds)

“It appears that I made a mistake,” Brennan later told the judge.

The implication during questioning was that they might have been caused by a collision and Wolfe overlooked them. Jurors were later instructed that the holes came from forensic analysts.

“The one thing you don’t want to do something as a trial lawyer is to promise something and then not deliver – but more importantly, say something’s true and it turns out it wasn’t,” Yannetti said.

Jurors found Read not guilty of murder, manslaughter and fleeing the scene of a deadly crash following two Massachusetts trials in the death of her former boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. They found her guilty of only a drunken driving charge, for which she will serve a year of probation.

Advertisement

“I was stunned that it occurred,” Robert Alessi, another of Read’s defense attorneys, told Runkle of the hoodie incident. “My heart broke for a moment, but it was a millisecond and I went into overdrive in regard to combating it.”

CLEARED OF MURDER CHARGES, KAREN READ COULD EYE LEGAL PAYBACK AGAINST INVESTIGATORS WHO COST HER

WATCH : Karen Read defense moves for a mistrial again

He demanded a mistrial with prejudice after the gaffe. Judge Beverly Cannone denied his motion, but the defense plowed forward.

VINDICATED KAREN READ THANKS ‘GREATEST’ LEGAL TEAM AS JURORS DELIVER NOT GUILTY VERDICT IN BOYFRIEND’S DEATH

“These charges, they were unjust – they were unwarranted – in my judgment,” Alessi said. “At the start of the retrial, once people were able to assimilate the evidence and understand it, my hope, even my expectation was the top-line charge should’ve been withdrawn.”

Advertisement

Officer John O’Keefe poses for his official portrait. O’Keefe’s girlfriend, Karen Reed, is currently on trial for murder after he was found dead outside a Massachusetts home in January 2022. (Boston Police Department)

FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X

The state went too far on a shaky case, Alessi said, and he called on voters to enact reforms.

“Spoiler alert – there never was a collision,” he told Runkle.

GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB

Advertisement

Karen Read is surrounded by reporters as she and her legal team leave the Dedham, Massachusetts, courthouse after the judge issued instructions to the jury in Read’s trial at Norfolk Superior Court on Friday, June 13, 2025. (Josh Reynolds/AP Photo)

Several jurors have spoken out about how they reached their verdict, including two who were skeptical of the police investigation, which included storing blood samples in red Solo cups, mislabeled evidence bags and a fired lead investigator.

SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER

Another juror, speaking with local WCVB-TV over the weekend, said she had gone into the case with an open mind but was leaning toward a guilty verdict before changing her mind over four days of deliberations.

“We’ve got a great democracy, and I am hopeful that the great people of this country that I love will take action, exercise the right to vote, stand up, be heard, and cause reform to be made,” Alessi added.

Advertisement

“And do it in a constructive way, a peaceful way, but an aggressive way.”



Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Hampshire

NH attorney general clears top Democratic official of ‘electioneering’ charge

Published

on

NH attorney general clears top Democratic official of ‘electioneering’ charge


The New Hampshire Attorney General’s office has concluded that Executive Councilor Karen Liot Hill did nothing wrong when she used her government email to assist a law firm that was suing the state over its voter ID law.

Assistant Attorney General Brendan O’Donnell wrote that Liot Hill’s use of her state email to assist a national Democratic law firm find plaintiffs didn’t amount to “electioneering” under state law.

The state Republican party alleged in August that Liot Hill — the only Democrat on the five-member Executive Council — misused her position by involving herself in a lawsuit against the state.

From the start, Liot Hill called that claim baseless, and the Attorney General’s office said Liot Hill’s conduct didn’t warrant sanction.

Advertisement

“This Office cannot conclude that the e-mails constituted a misuse of position or otherwise violated the executive branch ethics code. This matter is closed,” the office wrote.

In a statement Friday, Liot Hill, from Lebanon, welcomed the conclusion of the case.

“The AG’s findings underscore the partisan nature of the ongoing attacks against me: I am being impeached not for wrong-doing, but for being a Democrat,” she said.

The lawsuit challenging New Hampshire’s voter ID recently failed in state court. But this issue may not yet be over: A top House Republican has filed a bill to explore Liot Hill’s impeachment next year.

As the lone Democrat on the Executive Council, Liot Hill is her party’s ranking member in the State House. That profile has made Liot Hill, who spent two decades in local politics before winning election to the council last year, a regular target for Republicans, who argue that her approach to the job, which she says honors the state’s volunteer spirit, has crossed ethical lines.

Advertisement

The New Hampshire Republican Party did not immediately respond to a request for comment to the Attorney General report Friday afternoon.





Source link

Continue Reading

New Jersey

Noesen’s Power Play Goal Pushes Devils Past Mammoth | GAME STORY | New Jersey Devils

Published

on

Noesen’s Power Play Goal Pushes Devils Past Mammoth | GAME STORY | New Jersey Devils


SALT LAKE CITY, UT – The Devils spent much of the night against the Utah Mammoth searching for answers on the power play, watching chances come and go, starting the game 0-for-4 with the man-advantage. That frustration finally broke when Stefan Noesen planted himself in the crease and finished in tight on Karel Vejmelka to give New Jersey the breakthrough they desperately needed.

“Great road win,” Brett Pesce said. “Didn’t have our best, myself included, felt like I hadn’t played in two months,” Brett Pesce said. “You know what, we got a win, we grinded it out, good teams find ways to get to two points.”

Noesen’s conversion provided a much-needed release on an ailing power play, and the timing made it even more significant. Not only did it snap the drought, but it also handed the Devils their first lead of the night against the Mammoth, one they would hang on to win 2-1 in Utah.

Not to be outdone, Jacob Markstrom was rock solid, allowing just a single goal to Utah, in the first period. As the Devils tried to find their footing in the game, with failed power play opportunities, and Utah pressing hard, Markstrom held the fort.

Advertisement

“This one is on him tonight,” head coach Sheldon Keefe said. “We don’t get the opportunity to hang around in the game and have big moments like we did in the third with the penalty kill and power play, if not for Marky and how held us in. We were outplayed for long stretches of the game, but it’s going to happen from time to time.”

The Devils had a gut-check moment at the end of the third period, when Dawson Mercer took a penalty in the dying minutes of the game and the Mammoth pulled their goalie for a 6-on-4. New Jersey came up with the clears and the blocks to hang on for the victory.

The Devils weren’t going to be denied the opportunity for a win, as Connor Brown explained:

“Marky deserved the win at that point, it was a bit scrambly, maybe a bit more scrambly than we would have liked but they got two extra guys on the ice, so it was nice to gut one out.”

Utah opened the game scoring with a first-period power-play goal by Daniil But, before Connor Brown tied the game in the second period, his second goal in as many games and his third in four.

Advertisement

“I’m playing my brand of hockey,” Brown said. “I’m being empowered a little more, playing a little more minutes than typically have over the last couple of years and it’s leading into a little bit more confidence, little bit more plays, so just kind of running with it.”

The Devils have started to find some more stride in their game and are winning four of their last six, including two straight on the two-game road trip through Vegas and Utah.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

More than $22 million in

Published

on

More than  million in


More than $22 million in “Money Match” checks were mailed to nearly 100,000 Pennsylvanians, the treasury said. 

In a news release on Thursday, the Pennsylvania Treasury said people should be on the lookout for the checks, which are part of the Pennsylvania Money Match program. Treasurer Stacy Garrity said to cash or deposit the checks “promptly.”

The first Pennsylvania Money Match checks, totaling more than $1.7 million, are now on the way to Pennsylvanians’ mailboxes. Pennsylvania Money Match is a new program that allows Treasury to return certain unclaimed property to rightful owners automatically, which was approved unanimously by the General Assembly and signed by the Governor last year.

Advertisement

SC


“I want Pennsylvanians to know that this is a real check, it is real money, and it belongs to them,” Garrity said in the news release. “And as always, I still encourage everyone to regularly search for unclaimed property online, as many claims will not qualify for the Money Match process.”

With the mailing of the year’s last batch of checks, more than $50 million will have been returned automatically to Pennsylvanians.

What are Money Match checks?

The program allows the state treasury to automatically return unclaimed property valued up to $500 owned by a single individual. Before the program was created in 2024, residents themselves had to seek out unclaimed property.

“I’m thrilled to continue this program as we work hard to get more money back to its rightful owners,” Garrity said in the news release. 

Advertisement

However, if the property has multiple owners or is valued higher than $500, Pennsylvanians still need to file a claim.  

What is unclaimed property? 

Unclaimed property includes dormant bank accounts, uncashed checks, forgotten stocks, rebates and insurance policies, among other things. It can also include the contents of abandoned safe deposit boxes.

According to the state treasury, more than one in 10 Pennsylvanians is owed some of the $5 billion in unclaimed property in the treasury’s care, and the average value of a claim is more than $1,000.  

Unclaimed property scam

On its website, the state treasury has a warning about scammers using text messages to target potential unclaimed property claimants.   

The department “never reaches out to people in regard to any program, including unclaimed property, via unsolicited text messages.” 

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending