Connect with us

Massachusetts

Families, physicians fear what Medicaid cuts could mean for children in Massachusetts – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Families, physicians fear what Medicaid cuts could mean for children in Massachusetts – The Boston Globe


Now, parents, policy makers, and health providers are holding their breath as Republicans in Congress weigh potentially billions of dollars in cuts to Medicaid. Federal dollars pay for more than half of MassHealth’s $20 billion annual budget.

“MassHealth is a cornerstone for children’s health in Massachusetts,“ said Katherine Howitt, director of the Massachusetts Medicaid Policy Institute, an independent policy analysis program of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Foundation.

The consequences of significant cuts to Medicaid, and the potential for voter outrage, have some doubtful Congress will ultimately cut from the public insurance program.

The information coming out of Washington is too vague to act upon, said Mike Levine, assistant secretary for MassHealth.

Advertisement

“We do not have specific contingency plans around what services we offer kids and what we might do if Congress or CMS takes actions we don’t like,” he said in an interview Monday.

Still, the possibility frightens Bernard. When her daughter, Victoria, was 2, before doctors had figured out what prescriptions and dosages would best control her epilepsy, she routinely had multiple seizures a week, her mother said. The child’s speech is delayed, but with the therapy MassHealth pays for, she is learning to express herself verbally.

“Without MassHealth I don’t know how I would do,” Bernard said. “I’m very concerned about it.”

Congressional Republicans have said they want to balance tax cuts by, in part, eliminating $880 billion in federal spending over 10 years. Leading Republicans, including President Trump, have said that won’t include cuts to Medicaid benefits. US House Speaker Mike Johnson has said his party is seeking only to reduce “fraud, waste, and abuse.”

But experts on health policy say there’s no way Republicans can achieve their budget goals without impacting Medicaid. At more than $600 billion a year, the program is among the federal government’s largest expenses.

Advertisement

“We know that the only way to achieve $880 billion in cuts is through catastrophic cuts to the Medicaid program as we know it,” said Megan Cole Brahim, a Boston University professor and co-director of the school’s Medicaid Policy Lab. “There’s really no way it wouldn’t have harmful implications for children.”

Massachusetts expanded MassHealth in 2006 to include children in households earning up to 300 percent of the federal poverty level, extending coverage to more children than in all but a few states.

As of 2023, only 0.6 percent of Massachusetts children were uninsured, according to a report from the state Center for Health Information and Analysis on insurance coverage in the state.

The state’s post-pandemic review of MassHealth eligibility led to about 363,000 people removed from membership last year, including almost 59,000 children ages 17 and younger, the state reported.

Even if Congress took a hatchet to Medicaid, Cole Brahim said she anticipated Massachusetts would seek to protect children from the brunt of the consequences. Officials could be forced to reduce access to some optional benefits, such as physical therapy, case management, and community health workers, and could reduce the kinds of prescription drugs, or the dosage amounts, covered by MassHealth.

Advertisement

Losing even partial Medicaid reimbursements would be devastating to community health centers and hospitals. On average, the health centers receive about 31 percent of their revenue from MassHealth, according to the Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers. MassHealth paid about 18 percent of all hospital revenue in the state as of 2022, according to the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Foundation. Boston Children’s Hospital reported roughly 46 percent of its Massachusetts patients are MassHealth members. Substantial cuts to Medicaid, hospital officials said, would create financial aftershocks that would affect every patient in the hospital.

“The danger for any children’s hospital in the country, [if] you start cutting Medicaid, you’re going to affect care delivery for every patient,” said Joshua Greenberg, Boston Children’s vice president of government relations.

On Monday, Governor Maura Healey and her partner, Joanna Lydgate, toured Children’s to highlight how potential cuts to Medicaid, as well as halts to millions in National Institutes of Health research grants, could affect patients. Kevin B. Churchwell, the hospital’s president and chief executive, said federal funding cuts have already disrupted clinical trials and research, including work with vaccines.

“We have patients in clinical trials who had their treatments stop because of this,” Healey said. “Can you imagine the cruelty of that?”

Among the groups Medicaid supports, including seniors and some people with disabilities, children are a relatively inexpensive clientele. They account for about 16 percent of the state’s total MassHealth expense. The families of some children enrolled also have private insurance but rely on MassHealth as secondary coverage to help with medical-related bills their insurer doesn’t cover.

Advertisement

For many children, MassHealth membership means more than covered doctor visits. The program pays whatever is needed to ensure children with disabilities have the equipment, care, and support they need. It allows children to receive Medicaid-covered services through their school’s health services and pays for behavioral health care in the community or home.

In addition, families on MassHealth get screenings to identify dental, aural, visual, or developmental concerns. Such wide-ranging and widely accessible insurance coverage can benefit children their whole lives. Children with good health care do better in school, a 2021 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Foundation report stated, and those with access to Medicaid tend to have fewer hospital stays, emergency room visits, and chronic conditions in adulthood.

Victoria Bernard’s doctor, Laura Livaditis, director of pediatrics at Mattapan Community Health Center, said about 90 percent of the children treated at the center are enrolled in MassHealth. Most of her patients are also from families living at or below the poverty line. MassHealth’s wide-ranging coverage has helped them to avoid evictions, she said. And for immigrants, the program has helped them make connections to ensure they have stable food and housing.

“I’m continuously impressed with the breadth and depth of services MassHealth covers for my patients,” Livaditis said. “I can’t remember the last time I had to fight with [MassHealth] insurance for needed services.”

Correspondent Emily Spatz contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Jason Laughlin can be reached at jason.laughlin@globe.com. Follow him @jasmlaughlin.





Source link

Massachusetts

Planning a staycation? Tripadvisor recommends this MA city

Published

on

Planning a staycation? Tripadvisor recommends this MA city


play

Are you thinking about spending some time off but don’t want to splurge on a big international vacation?

A summer 2025 report found that many Americans are choosing nearby staycations over changing time zones.

Advertisement

And Tripadvisor said one of the best travel experiences you could have in the United States would actually be a guided walking tour in Salem, Massachusetts, and the Freedom Trail walking tour in Boston.

As part of 2025 Travelers’ Choice Awards: Best of the Best Things To Do, Tripadvisor said that History and Hauntings of Salem Guided Walking Tour is the second-best experience in the U.S.

As we move on from 2025 onto 2026, here’s what you need to know about this Bay State travel opportunity.

Tripadvisor said Salem has the second best experience in the U.S.

Tripadvisor said the History and Hauntings of Salem Guided Walking Tour is one of the best experiences in the United States. Its AI summary tool said the tour guides paint a vivid portrait of one of America’s most macabre towns.

Advertisement

Here’s what Tripadvisor said about it: “There are many Salem tours out there but few are as compelling as this one, led by a local historian who brings alive the city’s history at the time of day you choose. For a spookier experience, pick a nighttime tour led by lantern light. Visit the Burying Point Cemetery, Witch House, and Ropes Mansion garden as your guide tells stories of the haunted history of Salem, Massachusetts.”

The itinerary says the tour begins at Salem Old Town Hall and ends at Hamilton Hall, visiting sites like the Bewitched statue of Elizabeth Montgomery and The Witch House at Salem on the way.

You can book History and Hauntings of Salem Guided Walking Tour at this link here. Be aware that this event is booked 23 days in advance, the tour’s Tripadvisor page said.

Kathleen Wong contributed to the reporting of this story. Rin Velasco is a trending reporter. She can be reached at rvelasco@gannett.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts beach towns look to ease ‘overly strict’ conservation rules: ‘Common sense’

Published

on

Massachusetts beach towns look to ease ‘overly strict’ conservation rules: ‘Common sense’


As certain shorebirds rebound in population along the Massachusetts coast, beach towns are pushing for the state to strike a healthier balance between conservation and recreation.

State Rep. Kenneth Sweezey, a South Shore Republican, is leading the charge on Beacon Hill, authoring legislation to untangle what he describes as “overly strict” regulations hindering his region’s access to its beaches.

Over the years, Duxbury Beach, in particular, has borne the brunt of protecting recovering bird species, including piping plovers and terns, limiting business and recreational opportunities at the prominent South Shore coastline.

The Duxbury Beach Reservation, a private landlord, has had to close certain roads and portions of the shoreline while birds are nesting. Residents and visitors are also required to have an oversand vehicle permit, which costs more than $150, for beach access.

Advertisement

Under one of Sweezey’s proposals, the state Division of Fisheries and Wildlife would only restrict over-sand vehicle access or other recreational activities if the bird species is listed as endangered or threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act.

Sweezey has said that piping plovers are the only species nesting on Duxbury Beach, which his district includes, that are federally endangered, while other birds carry a state designation.

“Birds may be federally protected because they’re doing poorly in one region of the nation, even though they may be thriving in the Commonwealth,” Sweezey said at the State House last week. “Those differences sort of create problems when you’re looking at human access, recreational opportunities on the beaches and conservation on the beach.”

Sweezey made his appeal to the Joint Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, touting shorebird management expert Chris Kennedy for helping him craft his proposals.

Kennedy, a wildlife biologist who has worked for the state Environmental Police and Division of Fisheries and Wildlife over the decades, is championing an equal balance between conservation and recreation.

Advertisement

In response to a post in the ‘Save Duxbury Beach’ Facebook page, Kennedy highlighted how the Bay State has seen a nearly “tenfold” jump in nesting plovers since 1986, going from 140 to over 1,200 last year. Roseate and common terns are also “strongly increasing,” while least terns are “slowly climbing.”

“Reasonable public access is not anti-birds,” Kennedy stated. “It is simply common sense.”

The 1,221 nesting pairs of plovers identified in 2025 marked a record high for the species’ population, up even from the 1,196 in 2024, numbers show.

According to the state’s Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Duxbury Beach had 149 days of recreational activity last year.

Sweezey is also calling state regulators to conduct a review of their recreational management guidelines that protect piping plovers, terns and their habitats across the state at least once every two years. Part of that process would include two public hearings.

Advertisement

Patrick Parquette, a government affairs officer for the Massachusetts Striped Bass Association, called the state’s current shorebird management program “long outdated,” having been adopted in 1993.

Parquette pointed out how, decades ago, nests of certain shorebirds needed to be a minimum of an eighth of a mile apart. Today, species, including the piping plover, are nesting within 100 feet of each other.

“At the time, it was based on the best thinking that we had,” he said. “I don’t think there’s a reasonable human being in this building, no matter the ilk or philosophy they come from, that would say that our knowledge base 33 years ago could compare with today’s knowledge base.”

Andrew Marshall, founder of the Save Duxbury Beach nonprofit advocacy group, centers his concerns around climate change and its effects on the Plymouth County town of roughly 16,000.

“We’re being unfairly punished due to climate change, with some of these southern birds moving up to the north here,” Marshall told lawmakers. “These birds aren’t rare or threatened. They’re just new in our area.”

Advertisement

A third piece of legislation that Sweezey has crafted would ban state regulators from prohibiting any beach management program from using all legally authorized shorebird nesting mitigation tools under the state’s habitat conservation plan.

Sweezey said a goal of the bill would be to promote parity among Massachusetts beaches.

“These bills,” the representative said, “are critically important to our environment, our coastal traditions and local economies down in Duxbury, but really along the entire coast.”

A woman takes in the shoreline view at Duxbury Beach. (Staff Photo By Faith Ninivaggi/Boston Herald/Media News Group, File)



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

State police investigate fatal crash on I-93 in Quincy

Published

on

State police investigate fatal crash on I-93 in Quincy


A person has died after a single-vehicle crash on I-93 in Quincy on Sunday morning.

Troopers responded to the single-vehicle crash around 6:05 a.m. and found two people injured. One person has died, and another was seriously hurt.

The right lane remains closed at this time to allow for an investigation, according to Massachusetts State Police.

The victim’s name is not being released at this time.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending