Connect with us

Northeast

Federal appeals court rejects parents' challenge to school policy that hid students' gender identity

Published

on

Federal appeals court rejects parents' challenge to school policy that hid students' gender identity

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Massachusetts parents hope to take their case before the U.S. Supreme Court after a federal court ruled that they do not have a constitutional right to be notified about their child’s gender transition at school.

In a February 18 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld a lower court’s dismissal of the lawsuit first filed by parents Stephen Foote and Marissa Silvestri in 2022 against Ludlow Public Schools.

Advertisement

The lawsuit accuses school staff at Paul R. Baird Middle School in Ludlow, Massachusetts, of secretly encouraging their then- 11-year-old daughter to adopt a new name and different gendered pronouns while at school.

The parents argue that the school’s nondisclosure policy, which keeps a student’s requested gender identity from parents unless the student consents, violates their parental rights protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

JUDGE DISMISSES MA PARENTS’ LAWSUIT OVER SCHOOL GENDER POLICY, SCOLDS DISTRICT: ‘DISCONCERTING’

Parents lost a lawsuit in federal court this month challenging a Massachusetts school district policy that affirmed and concealed their child’s gender identity. (iStock via Getty/AP Photo)

“[The Ludlow School Committee and implicated educators] exceeded the bounds of legitimate pedagogical concerns and usurped the role of [the plaintiffs] and other parents in the Town of Ludlow to direct the education and upbringing of their children, make medical and mental health decisions for their children and to promote and preserve family privacy and integrity,” the lawsuit alleges.

Advertisement

Vernadette Ramirez Broyles, President and General Counsel for the Child & Parental Rights Campaign, represented the parents in court and said that they plan to petition the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case.

“We’re very disappointed and frankly disturbed by this decision,” Broyles told Fox News Digital. “I truly believe that parents across the nation, across Massachusetts, of all political stripes, will be disturbed by this.”

According to the lawsuit, Baird Middle School students were given a biographical video assignment by the school librarian that asked them to include their pronouns. Afterward, the plaintiffs’ daughter began receiving “unsolicited” LGBTQ video suggestions on her school computer, which made her start questioning her gender identity and sexuality, the lawsuit says. 

CHRISTIAN TEACHER FIRED OVER TRANS POLICY CELEBRATES TRUMP ORDER TARGETING GENDER IDEOLOGY IN SCHOOLS

L.G.B.T. activists and their supporters rally in support of transgender people on the steps of New York City Hall, October 24, 2018, in New York City.  (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Advertisement

After a teacher informed the parents that their daughter had confided in her that she was struggling with depression, self-esteem issues and confusion about her sexuality, the parents thanked the teacher and emailed teachers and school administrators to inform them they were seeking private counseling for their child. The parents directly instructed school officials to not have private conversations with their daughter about the issue.

Unbeknownst to the parents, the daughter later e-mailed the school counselor to say she was “genderqueer” and requested to be called by a new name and pronouns while at school.

The parents allege that various school officials — the librarian, principal, counselor and superintendent — violated their request by affirming and privately counseling the student about her gender identity, without their knowledge or consent, in alignment with the district’s nondisclosure policy.

Over one thousand school districts across the nation have gender identity nondisclosure policies, Parents Defending Education says. (istock)

A 3-judge panel of the First Circuit Court, entirely composed of Democratic presidential appointees, sided with the Ludlow school district. 

Advertisement

The panel ruled that the district’s nondisclosure policy “does not restrict parental rights in a way courts have recognized as a violation of the guarantees of substantive due process.”

The ruling recognized parents’ rights to be “informed of, and to direct, significant aspects of their child’s life,” but added that those rights “are not unlimited.”

“Parents may not invoke the Due Process Clause to create a preferred educational experience for their child in public school,” the ruling states.

The panel rejected the parents’ argument that the school’s actions constituted medical or mental health treatment, and argued that discussions about gender identity with the student were within the scope of the school’s ability to make “curricular and administrative decisions.”

MASSACHUSETTS PARENTS SUE SCHOOL, SAY OFFICIALS ENCOURAGED CHILDREN TO USE NEW NAMES, PRONOUNS WITHOUT CONSENT

Advertisement

Parents across the nation have filed lawsuits against school districts for concealing students’ gender identity from parents. (Fox News Digital)

The judges argued that Ludlow’s protocol followed guidance handed down by the Commonwealth’s Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE), advising schools on how to comply with state laws against gender identity discrimination in public schools. 

The DESE guidance suggests school officials accommodate a student’s requested gender identity to make them feel safe and supported and ask for their consent before informing parents, if they are 14 years of age or older. 

“If a student is under 14 and is not yet in the ninth grade, the student’s parent (alone) has the authority to decide on disclosures and other student record matters,” the guidance states.

Broyles told Fox News Digital that there were a number of issues with this defense.

Advertisement

First, the Education Department’s guidance was voluntary, so schools were not required to follow it, she said. Second, it did not apply in this case as the students were under 14 years old, and third, this guidance still must be interpreted in light of the U.S. Constitution.

She argued the court ruling expanded the authority of school officials over the family’s “personal, intimate mental health decisions.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST MEDIA AND CULTURE NEWS

Lawyers for Massachusetts parents Stephen Foote and Marissa Silvestri argued the gender identity nondisclosure protocol, affirming students’ gender identity without consulting parents, was an unconstitutional mental health intervention. (iStock)

“Effectively, parents are losing the ability to direct the upbringing of their child if they choose to send their children to public schools that they pay for in their taxes. That cannot possibly be the standard for the children of the First Circuit,” she said.

Advertisement

The lawsuit claimed school officials also applied the gender identity protocol to their 12-year-old son, who also began using a different name and pronouns around the same time of these events. However, the federal court’s decision only focused on the younger child, saying there were “scant relevant details” provided specific to the student’s older sibling.

The Massachusetts Family Institute also represented the parents in court.

The Ludlow defendants’ attorneys did not respond to requests for comment.

David Lawless, a lawyer for the Ludlow School Committee, called the First Circuit’s decision a “characteristically thoughtful and well-reasoned opinion,” Reuters reported.

The case is one of several cases nationally coming from parents suing school districts over their gender identity policies that conceal the child’s transgender identity from parents.

Advertisement

According to conservative education watchdog Parents Defending Education, there are at least 1,195 school districts across 37 states and Washington, D.C., that have policies that explicitly state that school officials “can or should keep a student’s transgender status hidden from parents.”

President Trump signed an executive order in January calling to strip federal funding for “illegal and discriminatory treatment and indoctrination in K-12 schools, including based on gender ideology and discriminatory equity ideology.”

Reuters contributed to this report.

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Boston, MA

Workers at the ICA in Boston opt to unionize – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Workers at the ICA in Boston opt to unionize – The Boston Globe


Employees at the Institute of Contemporary Art / Boston are gearing up for contract negotiations with the Seaport museum after quietly opting to unionize last month.

Just over 90 employees, in roles ranging from visitor services to development to curation, are now being represented by the UAW Local 2110, a New York-based union, as they prepare to go to the bargaining table, seeking better pay and other job protections.

The ICA voluntarily recognized the union shortly after the workers went to museum leadership in early April, said Maida Rosenstein, UAW Local 2110’s director of organizing. That meant the employees could sidestep a formal election through the National Labor Relations Board and instead conduct a card-counting process.

“That all happened quite quickly,” said Rosenstein.

Advertisement

“Our experience with getting voluntary recognition was that the ICA was reasonable about the process,” she added. “So hopefully that will continue through the bargaining process.”

The next step, Rosenstein said, is for the workers to elect a bargaining committee from among their ranks, and then draw up some specific proposals. “We’re hopeful of being able to be negotiating this summer,” she said.

In a statement, the ICA’s director, Nora Burnett Abrams, who stepped into the top job last May, noted that “our exceptional staff are at the heart of what makes the museum so special.”

“We are voluntarily recognizing our employees’ choice to be represented by a union and view the decision to organize as an expression of their deep dedication to the institution,” Burnett Abrams said. “We look forward to working collaboratively and in good faith with Local UAW 2110 toward a collective agreement.”

The ICA is just the latest local institution to see labor action among its workforce. UAW Local 2110 also represents employees at the MFA Boston, who voted to unionize in 2020 and secured compensation increases and other benefit improvements when they ratified their first contract in 2022. Workers at MASS MoCa in North Adams, the Emily Dickinson Museum in Amherst, and the Portland Museum of Art in Maine are also represented by UAW Local 2110.

Advertisement

Carter Seggev, a 28-year-old events coordinator at the museum, said seeing the MFA go through its own unionization process served as something of a blueprint for the ICA workers.

“It has been a very helpful beginner example, to sort of be like, ‘Oh, yeah, they can do it,’ and especially that scale,” he said.

Rosenstein said a chief concern among workers is improving pay, which is currently “very slightly above minimum wage at the entry level,” she said. Other concerns include protections against layoffs and other “health and safety” provisions, such as adequate rest and seating for visitor-facing employees.

For Seggev, who earns $50,000 a year at the museum, better pay is only one piece of the puzzle. He wants more transparency from museum leadership into policy decisions — and a greater say in the institution’s future.

“I like the ICA a lot. It’s a fun workplace, and I would love to have more of a voice in making sure that everyone is being considered and everyone’s needs are being taken into account,” he said. “For me personally, that’s been the biggest driving force.”

Advertisement

He added that, since workers went public with their organizing efforts, he’s been happy with leadership’s willingness to talk with workers about their aims. He was also encouraged by the museum’s voluntary recognition of the union.

“I know that is a very rare thing, and so far, the communication has been very positive,” he said. “I think everyone’s sort of looking forward to working together to make the ICA better.”

The ICA, which has been housed in a gleaming glass building perched on the waterfront since 2006, had an operating surplus of about $800,000 in the fiscal year that ended in June 2025, according to its latest publicly released financial statements. That was up more than a quarter-million dollars from the previous year.


Dana Gerber can be reached at dana.gerber@globe.com. Follow her @danagerber6.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pittsburg, PA

Panini A. Chowdhury: How much did Pittsburgh buy with its national introduction?

Published

on

Panini A. Chowdhury: How much did Pittsburgh buy with its national introduction?






Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

PAID POST: Connecticut Expands AI Workforce Training Through Charter Oak Partnership

Published

on

PAID POST: Connecticut Expands AI Workforce Training Through Charter Oak Partnership


Connecticut is taking a major step to prepare its workforce for the growing influence of artificial intelligence, as Charter Oak State College announces a significant expansion of its AI Academy.

Through this initiative, developed in partnership with the Business-Higher Education Forum and Axim Collaborative, Charter Oak learners, job seekers, educators, and employees of small and mid-sized businesses will gain new pathways to in-demand careers using the Open edX platform.

Charter Oak, which is part of the Connecticut State Colleges & Universities (CSCU) system, is the state’s only public online college.

At a time when artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming industries ranging from healthcare to finance, the expansion reflects both urgency and opportunity. Employers are increasingly seeking workers who understand how to apply AI tools effectively, yet many job seekers and organizations lack access to affordable, relevant training. The AI Academy is intended to close that gap by aligning education directly with workforce needs.

Advertisement

This effort addresses a pressing economic challenge: ensuring that small and mid-sized businesses — which employ nearly half of Connecticut’s workforce — are not left behind as AI reshapes industries.

“Connecticut’s economic strength lies in its small and medium-sized businesses. The expansion of the AI Academy is a direct investment in those businesses, providing them with the high-level AI fluency typically reserved for large corporations. Furthermore, by bringing a tool-agnostic, mindset-first approach to our K-12 districts, we are helping educators move past the ‘hype’ and focus on the strategic deployment of AI. We aren’t just teaching people how to use AI; we are empowering Connecticut’s schools and businesses to lead with it,” said Dr. Dave Ferreira, Provost, Charter Oak State College.

The expanded AI Academy will offer stackable credentials over a three-year period, combining technical training with durable skills like communication, problem-solving, adaptability, and digital literacy. Learners will be able to progress at their own pace, building credentials that align with specific career pathways while remaining flexible enough to adapt to changing job market demands.

The program is designed with direct input from more than 100 leaders across business and higher education, including major employers in insurance, consulting, and technology. That collaboration ensures the curriculum reflects real-world needs, helping participants gain skills that are immediately applicable in the workplace.

A key component of the initiative is a new pathway for K-12 school districts. Rather than focusing on specific tools or platforms, the program emphasizes building an “AI mindset” — equipping educators and administrators with the knowledge to make informed, strategic decisions about how AI is used in classrooms and operations. This approach is intended to help school systems develop sustainable policies that can evolve alongside rapidly changing technology.

Advertisement

“The future of work demands a new kind of collaboration,” said Kristen Fox, CEO of the Business-Higher Education Forum. “When employers and institutions join forces to equip learners with AI skills and durable competencies, we create real pathways for people to unlock new opportunities, advance their careers, and thrive in an economy that is changing faster than any one sector can address alone. This is the model we need — and Connecticut is showing how it’s done.”

In addition to supporting businesses and schools, the initiative aims to expand access for individuals who have traditionally faced barriers to career advancement. By offering flexible online learning, the program is designed to reach underemployed workers, adult learners, and those seeking to transition into new fields.

The academy will begin with foundational AI coursework and expand into high-demand fields such as business, health technology, and cybersecurity — sectors where the need for skilled workers continues to grow. Over time, the program is expected to scale statewide before expanding nationally, with a goal of reaching 10,000 learners over the next five years.

“By partnering with employers to co-design AI-focused curricula, Charter Oak and BHEF are equipping learners with the skills and experiences they need to thrive in a changing economy while fueling regional economic development,” said Stephanie Khurana, CEO of Axim Collaborative.

The effort builds on Charter Oak’s existing CT AI Academy, launched in 2025, which has already served more than 3,500 residents with free AI training. That early success demonstrated strong demand for accessible AI education and helped lay the foundation for this expanded, more comprehensive model.

Advertisement

State higher education leaders say the initiative strengthens Connecticut’s long-term workforce pipeline while positioning the state as a model for others seeking to align education with economic development.

As artificial intelligence continues to reshape the workplace, Connecticut’s approach highlights how coordinated investment in education, business partnerships, and workforce development can help ensure that growth is both inclusive and sustainable — and that workers and employers alike are prepared for what comes next.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending