Culture
How CT scanners are being used on trading cards: The ethical and legal issues it presents
NORTON SHORES, Mich. — There is nothing outside that suggests the machines sitting inside this gray, nondescript building in an industrial office center could disrupt the trading card industry.
Sign your name on the clipboard just past the entrance. Walk by a long table with pizza boxes next to a refrigerator and it all feels pretty normal. It’s not until you turn the corner and see millions of dollars worth of machinery in an open space flanked by a giant American flag on the wall that it starts to feel different. When you’re asked not to take certain pictures or video because of the required privacy of inventory nearby, yeah, that’s when everything changes.
There could be airplane parts. Pieces of a satellite. Rocketry. Military ballistics. And on a recent Friday afternoon, an unopened Mega Box of 2023 Donruss Optic Football cards with Anthony Richardson and Brock Purdy on the front, bought at a Detroit-area Meijer for $60.
The goal? To use the technology at Industrial Inspection and Consulting to see what’s inside without breaking the plastic wrapping that traditionally indicates an unsealed, untouched and unexamined package of cards.
For most of its history, buying and selling packs and boxes of trading cards was a game of chance with neither the buyer nor the seller knowing the results.
“The product is designed to be a mystery,” said Keith Irwin, the general manager of Industrial Inspection and Consulting.
And if it wants to stay that way?
“They’ll need to find new packaging solutions,” he said.
IIC went from a company focusing primarily on industrial X-rays and CT scans within the medical and aerospace fields to potentially taking the cover off the trading card industry without taking the cover off any product at all. And in the process, they say, their company — with no prior connections to the trading card industry — has earned thousands of satisfied customers in the collectibles space. All electing for a sneak peek at their cards before tearing the packs or boxes open, circumventing the mystery that has long been a central element of these products.
The service caters to high-end products manufactured by Topps, Panini and Upper Deck, with the technology best suited to reveal cards in densely packed configurations. Take a 2023 Panini Flawless Football First Off The Line case for instance. Each case comes with two boxes. Each box comes with one pack of 10 cards. At $15,000 a case, it certainly makes economic sense that collectors are willing to pay IIC the going rate of $650 per case of that product to get a CT scan and see whether there’s something inside that they want, or to keep the package sealed and sell it on to someone else.
The economics are easy. But the ethical dilemma isn’t for this group of non-collectors in western Michigan whose industrial scanning start-up has received a financial windfall from those in the hobby willing to pay for a preview.
“We’ve had to wrestle with that as a team and some of us think differently about it,” Irwin said. “So some of us say ‘It is what it is. We can do it (scan products).’ And others say, ‘This feels like we’re participating in something that is very much in a gray area.’ And we still wrestle with it. I think where we land is that we are data people and we’re very good at what we do. And if we’re not doing it, then somebody else will.”
Nick Andrews, co-host of the Sports Card Madness podcast, has been one of the more prevalent online commentators addressing the practice of CT scanning since IIC opened its doors to the trading card industry in late July. He’s been loudly expressing how this could be a significant concern within the hobby.
“I think ultimately they took the stance of Napster in a way, like they’re not committing fraud,” Andrews said. “What these people do with these CT scan(ned) cards is not their problem. You know, they’re not the shepherds or steward of the hobby.”
IIC’s website states, “Pandora’s box is open,” which is an interesting choice of words considering the controversial practice involves not opening the sports card box at all.
“I think that you can probably draw a lot of correlations to different industries that have been negatively impacted by a group or a large number of groups that figure out a way to get an edge,” said Zach Stanley, CEO of WeTheHobby, one of more prominent online card dealers and box breakers (the practice of opening boxes of cards in larger quantities after customers buy the rights to all the cards of specific teams, players, etc. that may come out of them) within the industry. “I also think my hope is that it is something that can be combated from a technological standpoint, but we’re obviously a ways off from that now.”
And with the CT scanning technology comes the increased possibility for questionable resale practices at best and fraud at worst.
“I’d strongly encourage collectors to buy from established shops they trust,” said Eric Doty, CEO of Loupe, a live streaming platform for online vendors. “The short-term gain you’d make from scanning is not worth the risk of losing your entire business due to breaching that trust.”
Stanley said WeTheHobby has been approached by other contacts within the industry to explore or be helped to explore CT scanning technology. He immediately followed up saying, “Obviously we rejected (the offer) quickly.” But not every seller stands on equal ground, or possesses an equal moral compass.
“When people get desperate they do desperate things,” Stanley said.
A 2000 Bowman Chrome Tom Brady rookie card as seen through the CT scanner. (Image provided by Industrial Inspection and Consulting)
It all began over lunch and a search for Charizard. The start-up industrial scanning company was looking for ways to market its capabilities and a brainstorming session led to the idea of scanning packs of Pokemon cards. Compared to airplane parts, scanning packs of cards was child’s play.
“It was like a revelation of ‘Holy cow! Not only did this work, but it’s extremely obvious,’” Irwin said. “That was really the extent of what we thought. So hey, let’s throw it up as a case study.”
Irwin said he posted the imagery and results on his LinkedIn page in late June, where it received “140 or 150 likes and tons of comments.” The company had no idea what it stumbled upon.
“Immediately we were like well nobody’s gonna be paying for our labor to be able to do this,” Irwin said. “But I think that that was a naive thought because we didn’t understand the true value of these cards.”
The values of sports and Pokemon cards have grown exponentially in recent years, with regular sales in the six-figure range and some going well into the millions (the highest sale to date for a Pokemon card was nearly $5.3 million in 2022 and the highest sale for a sports card was $12.6 million, also in 2022).
Irwin said the company began receiving emails from parties interested in having products scanned following the post on social media. He estimated it only took a week and a half from there to turn it into a “full flooded service.”
“We laugh that you have rocket components sitting on one shelf and then cards on the other shelf,” Irwin said. “It’s just odd.”
Irwin estimated the volume of product IIC has scanned since starting in July to be “in the thousands.” Though that’s still just a drop in the bucket for an industry that produces millions of packages of cards each year.
Now months into what’s gone from lunch room chatter to a sizable portion of Industrial Inspection’s income, what’s the biggest technical challenge for scanning thick paper and cardboard?
“How do we go fast enough to make it worth it for people to pay,” said Irwin, who told The Athletic on Wednesday the company has hired additional full-time staff to help with the card demand.
And what’s become the biggest non-technical challenge entering an unfamiliar niche space?
“It’s a moral dilemma,” Irwin said.
There have been threats. A window near the front of their building is covered. They’ve taken steps to protect themselves from those in the collectibles business who believe what they’re doing is morally wrong and a serious threat to a billion dollar industry.
“I think it’s certainly a disruption (in the industry). … First of all, for boxes that were produced before today, I think as a potential buyer of those boxes you have to be very cautious,” Professional Sports Authentication (PSA) CEO Nat Turner said in a recent interview on the Sports Card Madness podcast. “Basically you have to assume the box has been scanned. So I think you can see a price correction in boxes that are thrown up on eBay, for example, perhaps. But I think manufacturers I think are going to have to respond.”
The CT scanner loaded up with a box of football cards. (Photo: Craig Custance)
There’s been rampant speculation within the hobby long before IIC existed around card vendors using CT scanners to view inside card packs and boxes. Many times online accusations occur when box breakers unveil what some within the hobby would deem a disproportionate amount of “hits” from sealed products with a break.
Irwin said the company has seen verified proof that “many sources” are already scanning products and have been doing so without being public about it. (No proof was offered to The Athletic for this story.) IIC was the first one openly offering the service for certain price points, which is part of its moral defense. It believes it’s being very transparent about all of this. Its price list is on the website. So are pictures of the scans. IIC invited The Athletic in to see how it all works in person, an invitation that was accepted.
The company specifically quotes prices for high-end products (boxes priced around $1,000 or more, generally) manufactured by Topps, Panini, Upper Deck and Pokemon on its website, whose homepage essentially doesn’t promote the service at all other than an initial announcement near the bottom of the page. There’s a focus on cards from the last 25 years or so containing foil, raised portions, imprinted numbering and patches or relics (cards containing pieces of jerseys or other memorabilia) since those elements are the most defined on the scans.
Pricing varies per product. For example, IIC charges $75 for one box of Topps Dynasty, which is one of Topps’ premier products containing only one autographed patch card encased in a plastic holder and carries a retail price anywhere from $900 to $1,200, depending on the sport or year.
“Dynasty is our favorite, I’ll say that,” Irwin said. “It’s probably the easiest to detect, I’m guessing. It’s a single (package), it’s one to two cards, typically one card. It’s just a dream, and those are very expensive products. We sent out a quote to somebody with a Dynasty box, and they’re like, ‘God, this is a no brainer, I’m sending it over.’”
A patch autographed card numbered to 10 of Formula 1 star Max Verstappen from 2022 Topps Dynasty (image below) serves as one of IIC’s prime scanning discoveries. The card displayed by IIC last sold on eBay for nearly $2,200 on Aug. 3 according to CardLadder, which tracks sales across major online marketplaces.

When asked if card manufacturers like Topps and Panini have reached out to discuss the company’s scanning practices, Irwin said, “Any conversations like that are under non-disclosure, but we have spoken with a variety of interested parties that are leading the market. So I’m not just talking manufacturers — auction houses, authentication houses, third-party services that are like couriers, you name it. Pretty much anybody that is interested has either spoken to us or spoken to people that know us.”
Fanatics Collectibles, the owner of Topps, declined an interview for the story. But people inside Fanatics Collectibles told The Athletic: “While we believe that CT scanners aren’t currently being widely utilized, we take any issue that potentially harms collectors very seriously. As such, we are working on innovations and solutions to address the issue.”
Panini declined to be interviewed for this story. Upper Deck said it would look into the possibility, but never agreed to an interview. Goldin Auctions and parent company eBay declined an interview for the story, deferring the issue to individual sellers. The Athletic also reached out to four other prominent online vendors who never responded to interview requests.
When asked if the conversations with other parties involved a request to discontinue scanning products, having products scanned or ways to hinder the ability to reveal the contents of a product through scanning, Irwin said, “All of the above.”
“That’s an interesting question because it seems like publicly everybody wants us to stop,” Irwin said. “In private, nobody wants us to stop because everybody that you can imagine has reached out to us.”
There’s also no way to know whether a pack or box has been scanned without the person or company divulging that. There’s no database kept by IIC for what’s been scanned, nor is there an indicator placed on the product to show it’s been scanned by IIC.
Additionally, the company doesn’t know the true identity of everyone sending in products to be scanned.
“We’re not verifying our clients,” Irwin said. “A lot of them we assume are using fake emails. And so we don’t know who they are. Fake emails, fake names, and then we use Square for credit card processing. So we don’t know who any of these people are, honestly.”
Irwin said the company hasn’t looked into any instances of nefarious practices by individuals, box breakers, hobby shops or anyone else using IIC’s services once a scanned product leaves its hands.
“Our objective position is one of scientific ability and data-driven results,” according to IIC’s website. “It is not our responsibility to determine the ethical positions and choices of others and we do not accept responsibility for their actions. Our quotes require clients to disclose to their potential buyers if they have CT scanned their sealed products.”
The consequences from IIC for a customer failing to disclose to a potential buyer that a product was scanned is unclear. Legally speaking, that’s a different story.
Paul Lesko, a Missouri-based attorney known for being “The Hobby Lawyer,” said while scanning packs and boxes may be legal, consumer fraud charges could result for the owner of scanned products if resold without disclosure.
“Consumer fraud claims require a knowingly false representation about a product made with the intent for buyers to rely on that misrepresentation,” Lesko said. “So, if a seller scans a pack/box and determines it does not have a hit (industry parlance for a desirable/valuable card), but when selling states it ‘could contain an auto(graph) or patch’ or really just recites that the boxes ‘may contain an auto or relic’ or just shows a picture of the box with that representation from the manufacturer, that’s a false representation made by the seller in the hopes of duping the buyer.
“Best case scenario, after scanning a pack/box, if you’re going to resell it, disclose you scanned it.”
Irwin posed the question that anyone in the hobby would ask, though.
“Are people going to do that? I have no idea,” Irwin said.
Irwin was handed the box of 2023 Donruss Optic football cards, our attempt to see just how effective his technology was and the first thing he did was turn to YouTube. He wanted to learn more about a product in which he was unfamiliar since most people weren’t spending $75 to scan a $60 box of cards.
He landed on a video of a breaker sorting through each card individually. Immediately, he was able to determine that his machines wouldn’t be able to pick up the names of each player on the cards because of the design. But he was confident in the ability to pick up the outline of the players along with any uniform numbers, important indicators when searching for specific hits. He also expressed confidence in the ability to identify numbered cards and patches.
So we moved on to the next step.
A few feet away, a giant XTH 320 X-ray machine sat, waiting to reveal what was inside this box of football cards. Irwin placed the box in the middle of the machine on a round table on top of a piece of styrofoam. A large sliding door closed slowly, sealing itself next to a red emergency stop button and a caution sticker. Within minutes, the contents of the box of cards showed up on a monitor near the machine, each card a blurry gray rectangular shape that revealed little, until the outline of a patch on one of the cards became clear.
About 20 minutes later, the CT scan was complete. Irwin was able to rotate the scan in every direction. He was able to zoom in on specific cards. It was abundantly clear that the bottom pack contained the patch card, which he was then able to rotate and zoom in on to identify more characteristics of the card.
If we knew the specifics of a card we were trying to get, at that point we would have been able to identify it. But in the case of this patch card, we only could make out vague details. There was some writing on the front. It appeared to be a wide receiver with a number in the 80s. Just as important was identifying what wasn’t in the box. There didn’t appear to be any numbered cards. If we wanted to spend the time, we likely would have been able to determine there wasn’t a C.J. Stroud.
Once opened, the patch card turned out to be Raiders tight end Michael Mayer. A 10-minute scan of the contents was enough to conclude this wasn’t a particularly valuable box, which ended up being confirmed when it was later opened the old-fashioned way. By a 13-year-old ripping through foil.
The Michael Mayer patch card detected by the scan. (Photo: Craig Custance)
It wasn’t a fast process. There was a lot of card rotating and data reading. To truly benefit, there needs to be a target card in which the person doing the scanning can be on the lookout for. It’s tedious work on expensive equipment, one reason Irwin isn’t convinced the work is going to spread throughout the industry.
“You saw me scrolling through this data, it’s annoying, right?” Irwin said. “We were a startup hungry for work. We’re all workaholics without enough work. So we stumble upon this thing that nobody’s done before and all of a sudden we have… clients in a brand new territory.”
It’s transformed his business. Whether it alters another just might depend on what happens next.
There is a train that runs past the industrial complex where these scans are taking place, blaring its horn each morning while crossing a nearby road. It’s close enough that the shaking it produces in the building can disrupt scans that rely on complete stability for pinpoint accuracy.
The slightest vibration can get in the way of an accurate scan and that realization has helped this same group design a solution. IIC has patented a process that would make the scanning much more challenging.
“All (new packaging) has to do is introduce a slight vibration to the cards and it makes it very challenging for us to read it,” Irwin said.
The company hopes its solution would either be licensed or outright purchased by a card company.
“It would be strange to both want to be the fixer and then also the breaker,” Irwin said. “But in the conversations we’ve had, we’ve been compared to say Google wanting to hire the hacker to go through their systems, find loopholes, find ways in.”
But that still leaves every unopened product in the world made up to that point unprotected.
Geoff Wilson, a prominent YouTuber and owner of Cards HQ in Georgia, said in a video posted last week that he believes the CT scanning topic is an overblown issue for most collectors. He immediately followed up, though, saying certain types of collectors and investors should be “terrified.”
Wilson pointed to high-end sealed wax boxes that people have held onto for years as being an issue. He went so far to say he’s in the process of selling off older sealed boxes he’ s collected because “people will forever be concerned that this box was CT scanned” and the concern will only grow over time.
“I mean because of the moral gray, I think the best thing to do would be to eventually find a way to stop this, move out of it,” Irwin said. “What does that do for the last 25 years of product that is prime for CT scanning? I don’t know.”
So there lies the dilemma for the industry. The biggest problem isn’t that this is happening on a small scale. It’s that it’s creating distrust amongst consumers on a potentially larger one.
“Once you sow that distrust with the consumer, you’ve got bigger problems,” Stanley said. “I think that right now, educating the consumers on the fact that this is happening is going to enable them to be educated and prioritize who they are buying from. I think the resale market right now for sealed wax is going to become increasingly problematic.”
Follow The Athletic’s regular, in-depth sports memorabilia and collectibles coverage here.
The Athletic maintains full editorial independence in all our coverage. When you click or make purchases through our links, we may earn a commission.
(Top image: Industrial Inspection and Consulting, Craig Custance, Bruce Bennett/Getty Images, Mark Cunningham/MLB Photos via Getty Images; Design: Meech Robinson)
Culture
Poetry Challenge: Memorize “The More Loving One” by W.H. Auden
Let’s memorize a poem! Not because it’s good for us or because we think we should, but because it’s fun, a mental challenge with a solid aesthetic reward. You can amuse yourself, impress your friends and maybe discover that your way of thinking about the world — or even, as you’ll see, the universe — has shifted a bit.
Over the next five days, we’ll look closely at a great poem by one of our favorite poets, and we’ll have games, readings and lots of encouragement to help you learn it by heart. Some of you know how this works: Last year more Times readers than we could count memorized a jaunty 18-line recap of an all-night ferry ride. (If you missed that adventure, it’s not too late to embark. The ticket is still valid.)
This time, we’re training our telescopes on W.H. Auden’s “The More Loving One” — a clever, compact meditation on love, disappointment and the night sky.
Here’s the first of its four stanzas, read for us by Matthew McConaughey:
The More Loving One
Looking up at the stars, I know quite well
That, for all they care, I can go to hell,
But on earth indifference is the least
We have to dread from man or beast.
Matthew McConaughey, actor and poet
In four short lines we get a brisk, cynical tour of the universe: hell and the heavens, people and animals, coldness and cruelty. Commonplace observations — that the stars are distant; that life can be dangerous — are wound into a charming, provocative insight. The tone is conversational, mixing decorum and mild profanity in a manner that makes it a pleasure to keep reading.
Here’s Tracy K. Smith, a former U.S. poet laureate, with the second stanza:
How should we like it were stars to burn
With a passion for us we could not return?
If equal affection cannot be,
Let the more loving one be me.
Tracy K. Smith, poet
These lines abruptly shift the focus from astronomy to love, from the universal to the personal. Imagine how it would feel if the stars had massive, unrequited crushes on us! The speaker, couching his skepticism in a coy, hypothetical question, seems certain that we wouldn’t like this at all.
This certainty leads him to a remarkable confession, a moment of startling vulnerability. The poem’s title, “The More Loving One,” is restated with sweet, disarming frankness. Our friend is wearing his heart on his well-tailored sleeve.
The poem could end right there: two stanzas, point and counterpoint, about how we appreciate the stars in spite of their indifference because we would rather love than be loved.
But the third stanza takes it all back. Here’s Alison Bechdel reading it:
Admirer as I think I am
Of stars that do not give a damn,
I cannot, now I see them, say
I missed one terribly all day.
Alison Bechdel, graphic novelist
The speaker downgrades his foolish devotion to qualified admiration. No sooner has he established himself as “the more loving one” than he gives us — and perhaps himself — reason to doubt his ardor. He likes the stars fine, he guesses, but not so much as to think about them when they aren’t around.
The fourth and final stanza, read by Yiyun Li, takes this disenchantment even further:
Were all stars to disappear or die,
I should learn to look at an empty sky
And feel its total dark sublime,
Though this might take me a little time.
Yiyun Li, author
Wounded defiance gives way to a more rueful, resigned state of mind. If the universe were to snuff out its lights entirely, the speaker reckons he would find beauty in the void. A starless sky would make him just as happy.
Though perhaps, like so many spurned lovers before and after, he protests a little too much. Every fan of popular music knows that a song about how you don’t care that your baby left you is usually saying the opposite.
The last line puts a brave face on heartbreak.
So there you have it. In just 16 lines, this poem manages to be somber and funny, transparent and elusive. But there’s more to it than that. There is, for one thing, a voice — a thinking, feeling person behind those lines.
When he wrote “The More Loving One,” in the 1950s, Wystan Hugh Auden was among the most beloved writers in the English-speaking world. Before this week is over there will be more to say about Auden, but like most poets he would have preferred that we give our primary attention to the poem.
Its structure is straightforward and ingenious. Each of the four stanzas is virtually a poem unto itself — a complete thought expressed in one or two sentences tied up in a neat pair of couplets. Every quatrain is a concise, witty observation: what literary scholars call an epigram.
This makes the work of memorization seem less daunting. We can take “The More Loving One” one epigram at a time, marvelling at how the four add up to something stranger, deeper and more complex than might first appear.
So let’s go back to the beginning and try to memorize that insouciant, knowing first stanza. Below you’ll find a game we made to get you started. Give it a shot, and come back tomorrow for more!
Play a game to learn it by heart. Need more practice? Listen to Ada Limón, Matthew McConaughey, W.H. Auden and others recite our poem.
Question 1/6
Looking up at the stars, I know quite well That, for all they care, I can go to hell,
Tap a word above to fill in the highlighted blank.
Your first task: Learn the first four lines!
Let’s start with the first couplet. Fill in the rhyming words.
Monday
Love, the cosmos and everything in between, all in 16 lines.
Tuesday (Available tomorrow)
What’s love got to do with it?
Wednesday (Available April 22)
How to write about love? Be a little heartsick (and the best poet of your time).
Thursday (Available April 23)
Are we alone in the universe? Does it matter?
Friday (Available April 24)
You did it! You’re a star.
Ready for another round? Try your hand at the 2025 Poetry Challenge.
Edited by Gregory Cowles, Alicia DeSantis and Nick Donofrio. Additional editing by Emily Eakin,
Joumana Khatib, Emma Lumeij and Miguel Salazar. Design and development by Umi Syam. Additional
game design by Eden Weingart. Video editing by Meg Felling. Photo editing by Erica Ackerberg.
Illustration art direction by Tala Safie.
Illustrations by Daniel Barreto.
Text and audio recording of “The More Loving One,” by W.H. Auden, copyright © by the Estate of
W.H. Auden. Reprinted by permission of Curtis Brown, Ltd. Photograph accompanying Auden recording
from Imagno/Getty Images.
Culture
Famous Authors’ Less Famous Books
Literature
‘Romola’ (1863) by George Eliot
Who knew that there’s a major George Eliot novel that neither I nor any of my friends had ever heard of?
“Romola” was Eliot’s fourth novel, published between “The Mill on the Floss” (1860) and “Middlemarch” (1870-71). If my friends and I didn’t get this particular memo, and “Romola” is familiar to every Eliot fan but us, please skip the following.
“Romola” isn’t some fluky misfire better left unmentioned in light of Eliot’s greater work. It’s her only historical novel, set in Florence during the Italian Renaissance. It embraces big subjects like power, religion, art and social upheaval, but it’s not dry or overly intellectual. Its central character is a gifted, freethinking young woman named Romola, who enters a marriage so disastrous as to make Anna Karenina’s look relatively good.
It probably matters that many of Eliot’s other books have been adapted into movies or TV series, with actors like Hugh Dancy, Ben Kingsley, Emily Watson and Rufus Sewell. The BBC may be doing even more than we thought to keep classic literature alive. (In 1924, “Romola” was made into a silent movie starring Lillian Gish. It doesn’t seem to have made much difference.)
Anthony Trollope, among others, loved “Romola.” He did, however, warn Eliot against aiming over her readers’ heads, which may help explain its obscurity.
All I can say, really, is that it’s a mystery why some great books stay with us and others don’t.
‘Quiet Dell’ (2013) by Jayne Anne Phillips
This was an Oprah Book of the Week, which probably disqualifies it from B-side status, but it’s not nearly as well known as Phillips’s debut story collection, “Black Tickets” (1979), or her most recent novel, “Night Watch” (2023), which won her a long-overdue Pulitzer Prize.
Phillips has no parallel in her use of potent, stylized language to shine a light into the darkest of corners. In “Quiet Dell,” her only true-crime novel, she’s at the height of her powers, which are particularly apparent when she aims her language laser at horrific events that actually occurred. Her gift for transforming skeevy little lives into what I can only call “Blade Runner” mythology is consistently stunning.
Consider this passage from the opening chapter of “Quiet Dell”:
“Up high the bells are ringing for everyone alive. There are silver and gold and glass bells you can see through, and sleigh bells a hundred years old. My grandmother said there was a whisper for each one dead that year, and a feather drifting for each one waiting to be born.”
The book is full of language like that — and of complex, often chillingly perverse characters. It’s a dark, underrecognized beauty.
‘Solaris’ (1961) by Stanislaw Lem
You could argue that, in America, at least, the Polish writer Stanislaw Lem didn’t produce any A-side novels. You could just as easily argue that that makes all his novels both A-side and B-side.
It’s science fiction. All right?
I love science and speculative fiction, but I know a lot of literary types who take pride in their utter lack of interest in it. I always urge those people to read “Solaris,” which might change their opinions about a vast number of popular books they dismiss as trivial. As far as I know, no one has yet taken me up on that.
“Solaris” involves the crew of a space station continuing the study of an aquatic planet that has long defied analysis by the astrophysicists of Earth. Part of what sets the book apart from a lot of other science-fiction novels is Lem’s respect for enigma. He doesn’t offer contrived explanations in an attempt to seduce readers into suspending disbelief. The crew members start to experience … manifestations? … drawn from their lives and memories. If the planet has any intentions, however, they remain mysterious. All anyone can tell is that their desires and their fears, some of which are summoned from their subconsciousness, are being received and reflected back to them so vividly that it becomes difficult to tell the real from the projected. “Solaris” has the peculiar distinction of having been made into not one but two bad movies. Read the book instead.
‘Fox 8’ (2013) by George Saunders
If one of the most significant living American writers had become hypervisible with his 2017 novel, “Lincoln in the Bardo,” we’d go back and read his earlier work, wouldn’t we? Yes, and we may very well have already done so with the story collections “Tenth of December” (2013) and “Pastoralia” (2000). But what if we hadn’t yet read Saunders’s 2013 novella, “Fox 8,” about an unusually intelligent fox who, by listening to a family from outside their windows at night, has learned to understand, and write, in fox-English?: “One day, walking neer one of your Yuman houses, smelling all the interest with snout, I herd, from inside, the most amazing sound. Turns out, what that sound is, was: the Yuman voice, making werds. They sounded grate! They sounded like prety music! I listened to those music werds until the sun went down.”
Once Saunders became more visible to more of us, we’d want to read a book that ventures into the consciousness of a different species (novels tend to be about human beings), that maps the differences and the overlaps in human and animal consciousness, explores the effects of language on consciousness and is great fun.
We’d all have read it by now — right?
‘Between the Acts’ (1941) by Virginia Woolf
You could argue that Woolf didn’t have any B-sides, and yet it’s hard to deny that more people have read “Mrs. Dalloway” (1925) and “To the Lighthouse” (1927) than have read “The Voyage Out” (1915) or “Monday or Tuesday” (1921). Those, along with “Orlando” (1928) and “The Waves” (1931), are Woolf’s most prominent novels.
Four momentous novels is a considerable number for any writer, even a great one. That said, “Between the Acts,” her last novel, really should be considered the fifth of her significant books. The phrase “embarrassment of riches” comes to mind.
Five great novels by the same author is a lot for any reader to take on. Our reading time is finite. We won’t live long enough to read all the important books, no matter how old we get to be. I don’t expect many readers to be as devoted to Woolf as are the cohort of us who consider her to have been some sort of dark saint of literature and will snatch up any relic we can find. Fanatics like me will have read “Between the Acts” as well as “The Voyage Out,” “Monday or Tuesday” and “Flush” (1933), the story of Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s cocker spaniel. Speaking for myself, I don’t blame anyone who hasn’t gotten to those.
I merely want to add “Between the Acts” to the A-side, lest anyone who’s either new to Woolf or a tourist in Woolf-landia fail to rank it along with the other four contenders.
As briefly as possible: It focuses on an annual village pageant that attempts to convey all of English history in a single evening. The pageant itself interweaves subtly, brilliantly, with the lives of the villagers playing the parts.
It’s one of Woolf’s most lusciously lyrical novels. And it’s a crash course, of sorts, in her genius for conjuring worlds in which the molehill matters as much as the mountain, never mind their differences in size.
It’s also the most accessible of her greatest books. It could work for some as an entry point, in more or less the way William Faulkner’s “As I Lay Dying” (1930) can be the starter book before you go on to “The Sound and the Fury” (1929) or “Absalom, Absalom!” (1936).
As noted, there’s too much for us to read. We do the best we can.
More in Literature
See the rest of the issue
Culture
6 Poems You Should Know by Heart
Literature
‘Prayer’ (1985) by Galway Kinnell
Whatever happens. Whatever
what is is is what
I want. Only that. But that.
“I typically say Kinnell’s words at the start of my day, as I’m pedaling a traffic-laden path to my office,” says Major Jackson, 57, the author of six books of poetry, including “Razzle Dazzle” (2023). “The poem encourages a calm acceptance of the day’s events but also wants us to embrace the misapprehension and oblivion of life, to avoid probing too deeply for answers to inscrutable questions. I admire what Kinnell does with only 14 words; the repetition of ‘what,’ ‘that’ and ‘is’ would seem to limit the poem’s sentiment but, paradoxically, the poem opens widely to contain all manner of human experience. The three ‘is’es in the middle line give it a symmetry that makes its message feel part of a natural order, and even more convincing. Thanks to the skillful punctuation, pauses and staccato rhythm, a tonal quality of interior reflection emerges. Much like a haiku, it continues after its last words, lingering like the last note played on a piano that slowly fades.”
“Just as I was entering young adulthood, probably slow to claim romantic feelings, a girlfriend copied out a poem by Pablo Neruda and slipped it into an envelope with red lipstick kisses all over it. In turn, I recited this poem. It took me the remainder of that winter to memorize its lines,” says Jackson. “The poem captures the pitch of longing that defines love at its most intense. The speaker in Shakespeare’s most famous sonnet believes the poem creates the beloved, ‘So long as men can breathe or eyes can see, / So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.’ (Sonnet 18). In Rilke’s expressive declarations of yearning, the beloved remains elusive. Wherever the speaker looks or travels, she marks his world by her absence. I find this deeply moving.”
“Clifton faced many obstacles, including cancer, a kidney transplant and the loss of her husband and two of her children. Through it all, she crafted a long career as a pre-eminent American poet,” says Jackson. “Her poem ‘won’t you celebrate with me’ is a war cry, an invitation to share in her victories against life’s persistent challenges. The poem is meaningful to all who have had to stare down death in a hospital or had to bereave the passing of close relations. But, even for those who have yet to mourn life’s vicissitudes, the poem is instructive in cultivating resilience and a persevering attitude. I keep coming back to the image of the speaker’s hands and the spirit of steadying oneself in the face of unspeakable storms. She asks in a perfectly attuned gorgeously metrical line, ‘what did i see to be except myself?’”
‘Sonnet 94’ (1609) by William Shakespeare
They that have power to hurt and will do none,
That do not do the thing they most do show,
Who, moving others, are themselves as stone,
Unmovèd, cold, and to temptation slow,
They rightly do inherit heaven’s graces
And husband nature’s riches from expense;
They are the lords and owners of their faces,
Others but stewards of their excellence.
The summer’s flower is to the summer sweet,
Though to itself it only live and die;
But if that flower with base infection meet,
The basest weed outbraves his dignity.
For sweetest things turn sourest by their deeds;
Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds.
“It’s one of the moments of Western consciousness,” says Frederick Seidel, 90, the author of more than a dozen collections of poetry, including “So What” (2024). “Shakespeare knows and says what he knows.”
“It trombones magnificent, unbearable sorrow,” says Seidel.
“It’s smartass and bitter and bright,” says Seidel.
These interviews have been edited and condensed.
More in Literature
See the rest of the issue
-
Culture31 minutes agoPoetry Challenge: Memorize “The More Loving One” by W.H. Auden
-
Lifestyle37 minutes agoPhotos: How overfishing in Southeast Asia is an ecological and human crisis
-
Technology49 minutes agoBlue Origin successfully reused its New Glenn rocket
-
World55 minutes agoDistress call captures tanker under fire, Iran shuts Hormuz trapping thousands of sailors
-
Politics1 hour agoTrump ally diGenova tapped to lead DOJ probe into Brennan over Russia probe origins
-
Health1 hour agoExperts reveal why ‘nonnamaxxing’ trend may improve mental, physical health
-
Sports1 hour ago‘Demon’ Finn Balor settles score with Dominik Mysterio at WrestleMania 42
-
Technology1 hour agoiPhone and Samsung flashlight tricks you should know