Crypto
What is the strategic bitcoin reserve that Trump is promising and how would it work?
The US election results are monopolizing the debate in the crypto world. Donald Trump’s victory has taken Bitcoin to levels never seen before. In fact, for days now, a single Bitcoin is nearing $100,000, which has investors holding their breath. Other altcoins are joining in this euphoria, breaking new records. This includes Solana, as well as XRP — Ripple’s currency — which has seen triple-digit growth.
The cryptocurrency sector — already euphoric about the election of a pro-crypto president who wants to gut financial regulations — is now awaiting the materialization of the numerous promises that the Republican candidate made during the 2024 campaign.
Experts warn that it remains to be seen whether the tycoon will actually be able to honor his announcements. But, for the moment, the industry’s wishes seem to be fulfilled. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler — who has been skeptical and sometimes hostile to cryptocurrencies over the years — has already announced that he will step down as head of the securities market supervisor on January 20 at noon, just as Trump takes office. Meanwhile, the Republican recently named Scott Bessent as his nominee for the Department of the Treasury.
Bessent — in an interview with Fox Business earlier this year — said that cryptocurrencies “are about freedom and the crypto economy is here to stay. These assets are attracting young people, who haven’t participated in the [stock market].” But one of the promises that most excites the industry and investors is the possibility of creating a strategic reserve of bitcoins in the U.S. Trump mentioned this project back in June, during the Bitcoin 2024 conference held in Nashville, Tennessee. The proposal has deeply resonated with the sector.
What is a strategic bitcoin reserve?
A strategic reserve is a set of external assets that are immediately available and under the control of the monetary authorities. They’re meant to meet the financing needs of the balance of payments, or to intervene in the foreign exchange markets in order to influence the exchange rate, to name just some examples. In this way, a bitcoin reserve would be similar to the gold and foreign currency reserves held by central banks. There are also strategic reserves of basic raw materials, such as oil.
The pioneering cryptocurrencies would be incorporated into the mix of assets that the North American country has on its balance sheet, with the aim of diversifying reserves. However, the project isn’t clearly laid out and there’s still much speculation on the matter, starting with the basic question of which authority would be responsible for managing it. Would it be the Federal Reserve? Or another institution? And the no less important question concerns how to pay for it. Bitcoins could be purchased after selling off other assets — such as gold or bonds — increasing debt, or expanding the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet, an operation that is colloquially known as “printing money.”
This reserve would also include the bitcoins that the U.S. administration has seized to-date: some 208,109, worth almost $20 billion at the current market price. These include the cryptocurrencies confiscated in 2013 from Ross Ulbricht, the founder of Silk Road, a dark web that operated exclusively in bitcoin. Users would traffic drugs and hire hitmen, among other things. During the election campaign, Donald Trump promised to commute Ulbricht’s life sentence upon reaching the White House.
What does the proposal look like?
The most concrete proposal so far is that of pro-crypto Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis, who introduced her Bitcoin Act of 2024 (Boosting Innovation, Technology and Competitiveness through Optimized Investment Nationwide Act) in the Senate. This project provides for the Treasury and the Federal Reserve to buy 200,000 bitcoins each year for a period of five years, until reaching one million units. This would represent about 5% of the total global supply of bitcoins, which is around 21 million. The reserve would subsequently be maintained for a minimum of 20 years. The idea is that this reserve would serve as a hedge against the devaluation of the U.S. dollar, to strengthen national balance sheets and support future debt issues.
In the legislation, the proposed mechanism to purchase the cryptocurrency has two elements: on the one hand, the surplus that the Federal Reserve returns to the Treasury (i.e. the profits of the U.S. central banking system) would be used to buy bitcoin. On the other hand, it proposes that the central banks of each state reassess the gold certificates they hold, to better reflect the value of the metal in the current market. They must then deliver the difference to the Treasury, which will use the funds to buy bitcoin.
Noelle Achenson — author of the Crypto is Macro Now newsletter — explains that the Fed has certificates on its balance sheet that represent the gold held by the Treasury. The total valuation is approximately $10.5 billion. However, this value is based on a legal price that, since 1973, has remained constant at $42 per ounce. If valued at current prices, the stored gold would be worth about $643 billion.
Beyond the federal administration, states are also moving to have their own bitcoin reserves. Mike Cabell — a member of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives — recently introduced a bill for the creation of a strategic bitcoin reserve to allow the state treasury to invest up to 10% of its funds in bitcoin. The aim of this legislation is for the cryptocurrency to serve as a hedge against inflation. However, the details of the proposed regulations are still unknown.
What have other countries done?
El Salvador has been a pioneer in creating a strategic crypto reserve. In fact, the Central American country was the first to adopt bitcoin as legal tender in September of 2021. The government has since acquired up to 5,944 bitcoin, valued at more than $560 million at the current market price, according to the country’s Bitcoin Office. Added to this is the kingdom of Bhutan, which owns 12,218 bitcoins, valued at $1.2 billion, according to data from the firm Arkham Intelligence. The firm details that the fortune of this crypto state comes from bitcoin mining operations (taking advantage of the national orography for the generation of electrical energy) carried out by the country’s investment arm, the state-owned conglomerate Druk Holdings.
Other nations that own the pioneering cryptocurrency have mainly accumulated it through confiscations, as is the case of the United States. But beyond the North American country, other states have been collecting bitcoin in recent years. The United Kingdom, in fact, has an account with 61,245 tokens, worth more than $6 billion.
Experts also point to China as one of the largest holders of this cryptocurrency. In November of 2020, authorities confiscated 194,775 bitcoin from members of the PlusToken Ponzi scheme, a scam operating in the Asian country that promised its victims “constant” double-digit returns. The perpetrators of this scam collected cryptocurrencies worth billions of dollars, which they then used to buy properties and luxury cars for themselves or their relatives. However — according to Arkham Investments — it’s unclear whether the Chinese government still owns these seized bitcoins, or has since sold them.
What do the analysts say?
The experts consulted by EL PAÍS disagree on the possibility of this project being carried out. Luis Garvía — director of the Financial Risk graduate program at the Madrid-based Catholic Institute of Business Administration (ICADE) — is blunt: “It seems absolutely reasonable to me that any government should have a part of its reserves in bitcoin. Diversification is very important,” he emphasizes.
Carlos Salinas — a professor in the master’s degree program in Blockchain and Digital Asset Investment at the IEB — believes that the promise of creating a bitcoin reserve is one of the main drivers of the asset’s surging price. However, he doubts that the U.S. can accumulate such a large quantity of bitcoin, although he doesn’t rule it out entirely. And, if the proposed legislation indeed sees the light of day, other nations — such as Russia, China, Brazil, or India — wouldn’t want to be left out: “At the last highs of bitcoin in 2021, we saw the FOMO, but in this current bullish phase, we’re [dealing] with institutional FOMO. We don’t know how big this can become,” he warns
For his part, Javier Molina — a senior market analyst at eToro — doubts that bitcoin can ever be considered a store of value like gold, nor that there will ever be a large-scale adoption of the currency by governments, at least in the short and medium-term. “While the idea that bitcoin could one day play a role similar to that of gold as a store of value — like ‘digital gold’ — may be interesting, I think we’re still far from seeing a race for digital reserves at the government level,” he opines.
David Tercero-Lucas is a professor of Economics at ICADE. He specializes in cryptoassets and digital currencies. He highlights that, while bitcoin shares certain characteristics with traditional assets — such as gold, for example, given its scarcity and its independence from centralized entities — it lacks other essential characteristics typical of reliable reserve assets. “Gold has a millennia-old history as a store of value; it’s widely-accepted and has industrial uses that reinforce its usefulness. Currencies, such as the dollar, are backed by robust states and financial systems. Bitcoin, on the other hand, is extremely volatile and its value depends more on speculative expectations than on tangible fundamentals,” he details.
Therefore, according to this expert, selling gold to buy this cryptocurrency is risky, especially since its capacity to serve as a strategic reserve in crisis contexts has never been validated in the long-term. He also points out that the idea that this asset cannot be sold for 20 years — one of the requirements included in the Bitcoin Act — doesn’t offer financial resilience in the short-term. In fact, it contradicts the purpose of a strategic reserve, which should be available to stabilize the economy in emergency situations.
Santiago Carbó — a professor of Economics at the University of Valencia — agrees with this analysis. He warns that the proposed U.S. legislation sets a dangerous precedent: “Bitcoin has been anything but a stable value until now.” He trusts in the orthodoxy of the Federal Reserve to prevent this project from being approved, while still recognizing the growing acceptance of this cryptocurrency among investors. He also points to the lack of transparency in the crypto market, its lack of maturity and high levels of risk that make it unreliable as a reserve asset.
The expert consulted by EL PAÍS who’s most wary about the launch of a strategic reserve is Manuel Villegas, a digital asset analyst at Julius Baer. For him, there’s still a lot of noise around the idea. “The market has anticipated a lot and I think it hasn’t yet fully understood that this is [a serious] proposal. There’s a lot of speculation about what may happen. But the Federal Reserve is an independent authority and, in recent months, Jerome Powell hasn’t been very favorable to this issue,” he warns. Moreover, unlike SEC Chair Gary Gensler, the Fed chairman already made it clear at the last Fed meeting that he doesn’t intend to resign and that Trump cannot fire him.
Add to this another factor: market concentration. According to Villegas, buying 200,000 bitcoins a year in a market as illiquid as the current one could drive prices up excessively. And, on the other hand, it could concentrate a large part of the supply of this cryptocurrency in the hands of the U.S.: “It would become one of the largest holders of the asset, with 5% in reserves. [We also must add] the 3% held by MicroStrategy [which already has about $17 billion worth of bitcoin on its balance sheet] plus the holdings of Marathon and BlackRock,” he concludes.
While Bitcoin investors and the industry are rubbing their hands gleefully at the prospect of the pioneering cryptocurrency’s value skyrocketing even further, prediction markets indicate that this project won’t happen: the odds of the U.S. having its own Bitcoin strategic reserve stand at just 30% on Polymarket.
Translated by Avik Jain Chatlani.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition
Crypto
1 Cryptocurrency to Buy While It’s Under $80,000
Key Points
-
Investor pessimism toward the digital asset market has driven this top cryptocurrency 40% off its record high from last October.
-
History reveals that fiat currencies often end in collapse, paving the way for this innovative monetary asset to find greater adoption across the global economy.
-
Besides being electronic, scarcity and neutrality support this cryptocurrency’s value proposition.
It hasn’t been an enjoyable time if you have money tied up in cryptocurrencies. After the market’s valuation peaked at $4.4 trillion in October, we’ve witnessed a downward spiral that has resulted in that figure plummeting to $2.6 trillion today (as of April 17).
On the other hand, the S&P 500 index climbed 5% during the same time. It’s completely understandable if people want to forget about digital assets. They aren’t the easiest to hold; it’s hard to handle the volatility.
Will AI create the world’s first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an “Indispensable Monopoly” providing the critical technology Nvidia and Intel both need. Continue »
However, a monster opportunity is staring investors in the face. Here’s the cryptocurrency to buy right now, especially since it trades under $80,000.
Image source: Getty Images.
It usually doesn’t end well for fiat currencies
It’s time to shine the spotlight on Bitcoin(CRYPTO: BTC), the world’s first and most valuable cryptocurrency, with a market cap of $1.5 trillion. Bitcoin is a decentralized monetary network that was built to allow anyone in the world to transfer value to anyone else anywhere in the world without the use of an intermediary. It was a technological breakthrough at the time. And it still is today.
To understand the enormous importance of a completely novel monetary network to emerge, one that’s digital, immutable, and not controlled by anyone, it requires looking at the past. Fiat currencies, like the U.S. dollar, have a troubled history.
Since President Richard Nixon ended the convertibility of U.S. dollars to gold in 1971, the world economy has operated on government-backed, or fiat, currencies. The U.S. dollar has been the global reserve currency.
But the track record is impossible to ignore. Fiat currencies often end in collapse. Before the U.S. dollar’s current reign, it was the British Pound sterling. Over time, inflation decreases purchasing power, sometimes rapidly.
Is the writing on the wall for the U.S. dollar? Persistent fiscal deficits in the U.S., an ever-expanding debt burden that’s nearing $40 trillion, loss of public confidence and trust, and political instability are all clear signs that cracks in the system are forming.
While unsustainable things can go on for much longer than people anticipate, perhaps it’s only a matter of time before the U.S. dollar’s dominance comes to an end. And Bitcoin appears well-positioned to be a winner from this development.
The history lesson naturally leads to Bitcoin
After gaining more knowledge about the history of fiat currencies, investors will figure out the best ways to allocate capital to maintain and grow their purchasing power over the next decade. High-quality stocks, particularly in businesses that possess pricing power, present one idea. Real estate and commodities are also interesting if you have expertise in these areas.
Gold also comes to mind. It might not be a coincidence that the precious metal’s price doubled in the past two years. Those in charge of large pools of capital might be considering some of the variables that I just discussed, leading them to direct money toward an asset that has been viewed as a top store of value for millennia.
I believe, however, that Bitcoin is the best bet if you think there’s even a tiny chance that the U.S. dollar will collapse as its predecessors did.
Bitcoin is superior to gold, in my opinion. It’s purely digital, while also being divisible, allowing people to transact with it. It’s borderless and portable. And it’s finite, with a hard supply cap of 21 million units. It makes sense that a neutral monetary asset would succeed, or at least rise alongside, the U.S. dollar’s run. Individuals, corporations, financial institutions, and governments should gravitate toward the supreme cryptocurrency.
And that supports a much higher price a decade from now, with the upside even bigger on a longer time horizon. With Bitcoin trading 40% off its peak, at a price that’s under $80,000 right now, investors have the opportunity to buy what could end up being the dominant financial instrument in the economy one day.
Should you buy stock in Bitcoin right now?
Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $524,786!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,236,406!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 199% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 19, 2026.
Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Crypto
Arthur Hayes Warns Bitcoin May Stall Until Liquidity Returns
Key Takeaways:
- Arthur Hayes ties bitcoin’s outlook to global liquidity, with upside dependent on policy-driven liquidity.
- Geopolitics create a bearish setup as war risk, deleveraging, and AI-driven stress weigh on markets.
- Liquidity injections could lift bitcoin once credit stress forces intervention.
Bitcoin Outlook Hinges on Liquidity
Arthur Hayes’ latest market note, titled “No Trade Zone,” signals that bitcoin’s outlook is increasingly tied to global liquidity conditions rather than traditional macro indicators. On April 15, the Bitmex co-founder and Maelstrom CIO outlined a cautious stance, citing geopolitical tensions and artificial intelligence-driven economic risks as key constraints. The essay presents BTC as vulnerable in the short term but positioned to respond to future monetary expansion.
Hayes centered his outlook on monetary conditions rather than conventional valuation models. He asked, “Do you believe the quantity or the price of money is more important when valuing bitcoin?” He then answered with a direct thesis:
“I believe the quantity of money determines the price of bitcoin, not its price.”
That view underpins his broader market framework, which expects bitcoin to struggle during periods of forced deleveraging, then strengthen when policymakers expand credit. He tied that dynamic to several geopolitical outcomes involving the Strait of Hormuz, as well as to a domestic economic slowdown driven by job losses among white-collar workers. In Hayes’ view, those pressures could hit credit quality, weigh on banks, and delay any durable crypto rally until authorities supply fresh liquidity to stabilize the system.
War Risk and Credit Stress Threaten Rally
That caution appears clearly in one of the essay’s most specific forecasts. “ Bitcoin might bounce a bit after the situation reverts to the pre-war status quo,” Hayes wrote. “However, the AI agentic deflation bomb still ticks below the surface. Until the Fed provides the liquidity needed to plug the black hole in banks’ balance sheets caused by consumer credit defaults, bitcoin will not meaningfully rise.” He further shared:
“That’s not to say it couldn’t spike to $80,000 to $90,000, but for me putting new units of fiat at risk requires an all-clear from the Fed.”
The statement shows that he still sees upside potential, but not before broader financial stress is addressed.
Hayes also warned that market stress could produce another sharp bitcoin selloff before any recovery takes hold. “As investors de-risk their portfolios because of higher volatility and lower prices, investors sell bitcoin to meet margin calls,” he described, adding: “Only when things get bad enough will bitcoin rise, as expectations of a bailout become the consensus.” In the most extreme scenario, even a liquidity-fueled rally may not last. As Hayes put it: “The rally in bitcoin, inspired by money printing, might be short-lived because the destruction of the Iranian state materially raises the prospect of WW3.” Taken together, the essay presents a conditional forecast: near-term volatility remains high, while any lasting upside still depends on crisis-era money creation.
Crypto
Chainalysis Details ‘Shadow Crypto Economy’ Exposure as Grinex Suspends Operations
Key Takeaways:
- Chainalysis flags Grinex swaps as inconsistent with typical law enforcement seizures.
- Tron-based conversions show illicit actors avoiding stablecoin issuer intervention.
- Grinex activity does not clearly align with patterns of a conventional external hack.
Grinex Shutdown Raises Questions About Crypto Laundering Tactics
Sanctions pressure continues to test the resilience of crypto networks tied to restricted financial activity. Blockchain intelligence firm Chainalysis on April 17 examined Grinex after the sanctioned exchange suspended operations. The review described the shutdown as a new stress point for infrastructure tied to sanctions evasion.
Grinex claimed a cyberattack cost about 1 billion rubles, or $13.7 million, and published the source and destination addresses involved. Chainalysis then assessed the transfers using on-chain data rather than relying on the exchange’s narrative. The analysis found that the stolen assets were mainly a fiat-backed stablecoin before being moved through a Tron-based decentralized exchange into TRX.
“In the case of the alleged Grinex hack, the stablecoin funds were quickly swapped for a non-freezable token, thereby avoiding the risk of having the stablecoins frozen by the issuer,” the blockchain analytics firm stated, adding:
“This frantic swapping from stablecoins to more decentralized tokens is a hallmark tactic of cybercriminals and illicit actors attempting to launder funds before a centralized freeze can be executed.”
Chainalysis argued that this behavior does not fit a typical Western law enforcement seizure because authorities can request freezes from centralized stablecoin issuers. The firm instead said the rapid conversion raises questions about whether the activity aligns with a conventional external hack.
Shadow Crypto Economy Shows Deep Interconnected Structure
Those conclusions rest on more than the attack claim alone. Chainalysis noted that the decentralized exchange used in the swap had previously served Garantex, the sanctioned predecessor to Grinex, as a liquidity source for hot wallets. That detail is notable because Chainalysis has already described Grinex as the direct successor to Garantex after international enforcement disrupted the earlier platform. The company also tied Grinex to A7A5, a ruble-backed token issued by sanctioned Kyrgyzstani company Old Vector.
According to the analysis, A7A5 was built for a narrow Russia-linked payments ecosystem aligned with cross-border settlement needs under sanctions pressure. Chainalysis added that the exfiltrated funds were still sitting in a single address at publication time, leaving a live trail for future forensic review.
The broader takeaway was less about one theft than about the financial system surrounding it. Chainalysis observed that the episode is the latest disruption inside a “shadow crypto economy.” That phrase captured the firm’s larger conclusion that Grinex, Garantex, A7A5, and related services formed an interlinked network designed to keep value moving despite sanctions. Chainalysis further disclosed that it labeled the relevant addresses in its products to help customers identify exposure as the funds move downstream. Even without final attribution, the firm made clear that Grinex’s suspension damages a key channel within that sanctioned ecosystem.
-
Sports12 minutes agoRyan Ward has a solid debut, but bullpen blows it again as Dodgers lose to Rockies
-
World24 minutes agoSchools, shops shut in northern Israel to protest the Lebanon ceasefire
-
News54 minutes agoCommunities launch cleanup after severe weather and tornadoes churn across Midwest
-
Detroit, MI3 hours agoGame 21: Tigers at Red Sox, Garrett Crochet battles both Detroit and the weather
-
San Francisco, CA3 hours agoWhy do gray whales keep dying in San Francisco’s waters?
-
Dallas, TX3 hours agoDallas Mavericks Owners Might Be Making Big Mistake in Search for New GM
-
Miami, FL3 hours agoDefense dominates, Mensah flashes in Miami’s spring game – The Miami Hurricane
-
Boston, MA3 hours ago
A crowd scientist is helping the Boston Marathon manage a growing field of 30,000-plus runners