Connect with us

California

California towns with cute ‘backyard cottages’ are booming – but not everyone is happy about it

Published

on

California towns with cute ‘backyard cottages’ are booming – but not everyone is happy about it


Californians are sidestepping the state’s acute housing shortage and soaring property prices by building cute cottages in their backyards – but not everyone is happy about this new development. 

Advocates say in-law suites or accessory dwelling units (ADUs) are the quickest and easiest way to get people into livable homes. 

But some experts are warning that ADUs can drive down the price of single-family homes in neighborhoods because potential buyers may not want to live near the tenant of the backyard unit. 

Others complain that these tiny homes are not a comparable substitute for building more traditional homes to combat housing shortages. 

Advertisement

Despite this, many people are continuing to build ADUs – often to house elderly relatives who need assistance and have no use for a big home anymore. 

After Teddy Gray King’s mother passed away in 2021, she decided to move her 88-year-old father into a prefabricated house on her property in Piedmont, a small Bay Area town just outside Oakland.

Pictured: An accessory dwelling unit on display. Many of them aren’t bigger than 1,000 square feet and have one bedroom

He had been living in a 3,000-square-foot home in Millbrae, which King said he was able to sell so it could be freed up for another family.

King said she bought the prefab house from an Oakland-based company for $268,000 and had it airlifted to her backyard in 2022.

‘In a place like Piedmont where…many houses have a big backyard, it’s kind of a perfect way for infill development (and) it’s pretty low impact from the visual perspective,’ she told the San Francisco Chronicle.

Advertisement

Wealthy communities like Piedmont – where the median household income is more than $250,000 – are the predominant areas where these backyard cottages get built, according to government data that tracks what type of housing is being constructed across the state.

After all, King paid nearly $270,000 for the one-bedroom home her father now lives in, which is higher than the median sale price for an entire house in Cleveland, Ohio, or Buffalo, New York.

King still made off with a discount though, since there isn’t a single one-bedroom home in Piedmont on the market for less than $389,000.

Pictured: A 650-square-foot backyard cottage in Oakland, California

Pictured: A 650-square-foot backyard cottage in Oakland, California

Pictured: The exterior of the cottage, complete with a living area and a kitchen

Pictured: The exterior of the cottage, complete with a living area and a kitchen

However, if the goal with ADUs is to house more people who are being squeezed by rising rent in California, it’s unlikely to succeed.

A brief from the Virginia Housing Commission found that a significant percentage of ADUs don’t rent for below-market rates.

Advertisement

Scott Wild, the senior vice president of real estate-focused firm John Burns Research & Consulting, recently authored a report that agreed with this assessment.

‘If rented out, ADUs usually garner decent premiums over nearby multifamily rentals, positioning them at the high end of the comparable rental spectrum,’ Wild claimed. 

A 2021 bill from the New York assembly tried to address this issue by creating an ADU financing program for homeowners who wanted to build one on their property. 

But if they took a loan from the program, they’d have to rent the unit at a below-market rate in their area.

This proposal never made it out of committee.

Advertisement
Pictured: A 499-square foot ADU in Los Angeles. Putting a '1/2' on the address number is a common practice for properties like this

Pictured: A 499-square foot ADU in Los Angeles. Putting a ‘1/2’ on the address number is a common practice for properties like this

Prefabricated accessory dwelling units are often small enough to be delivered by truck, pictured, or even be airlifted straight onto the property

Prefabricated accessory dwelling units are often small enough to be delivered by truck, pictured, or even be airlifted straight onto the property

Meanwhile, California is steaming ahead, leading the nation in the number of ADUs built. 

Piedmont Mayor Jennifer Cavenaugh said the city doesn’t have many unused lots available for housing, which could be why no new living space has been built in Piedmont except for ADUs over the last three years.

ADUs were the only new housing built in two other Bay Area cities in 2022 and 2023: Los Altos and Hillsborough. 

Matt Lewis, a spokesperson for California YIMBY (which stands for Yes in My Back Yard), supports Piedmont loosening restrictions on ADUs but said cities should also be repurposing existing buildings to house more people.

‘Every city has the ability to increase the number of homes within its borders,’ Lewis told the Chronicle. ‘We have some of the lowest density cities around and it’s because of the constraints cities have put not just on building but how many homes you can put in a building.’

Advertisement

The backyard cottage craze has come as a result of California passing legislation in 2016 that required cities to approve ADUs if they met parking and size requirements.

Over 31,000 homeowners applied for ADU permits in 2023, up from 7,000 in 2018, state data show.

Rohin Dhar, a San Francisco real estate agent, is skeptical about ADUs and fears they may lead to more complications for people trying to sell their homes

The momentum may only get stronger thanks to two new bills signed by Governor Gavin Newsom last year that allow property owners to sell ADUs separately from their primary home and ban local governments from forcing owners to live in their backyard cottages. 

Even though it’s become all the rage, a San Francisco real estate agent raised serious concerns about ADUs and their potential impact on the housing market.

Rohin Dhar said he sees plenty of single family home owners who build ADUs to rent it out for some extra income. 

Advertisement

The problem comes, he says, when they list their home, especially if there’s a tenant in the additional unit.

‘But when they go to sell the home, it sells for *way less* than if they had never built the ADU,’ he wrote in a post on X. ‘You’re basically selling a single family home with someone living in the in-law unit. That’s a hard sell!’

Another San Francisco real estate agent, Naomi Lempert Lopez, told DailyMail.com that the buyers she interacts with generally react favorably when shown properties with ADUs

Another San Francisco real estate agent, Naomi Lempert Lopez, told DailyMail.com that the buyers she interacts with generally react favorably when shown properties with ADUs

Lopez recommends her clients sell their ADU-equipped home when there's no tenant occupying the additional space to cut down on complications

Lopez recommends her clients sell their ADU-equipped home when there’s no tenant occupying the additional space to cut down on complications

Another San Francisco real estate agent told DailyMail.com that the buyers she interacts with generally react favorably when shown properties with ADUs.

‘For buyers, they open up possibilities with properties vis-à-vis extended guests or additional income,’ Naomi Lempert Lopez said. ‘There’s so much that you could do with an ADU and they add flexibility.’

She also said homes with ADUs sell for more than homes without them, though its important to note that an additional unit adds square footage, which almost by definition would increase the price of a property.

Advertisement

However, Lopez recommends her clients sell their ADU-equipped home when there is no tenant occupying the additional space to cut down on complications. 

‘San Francisco is a city with extremely strong tenant protections, and so anything that is tenant occupied, be it the home, be it the ADU, be it a multi family, that is going to definitely give buyers pause,’ she said.

‘I would definitely say that selling vacant is a much bigger value add.’



Source link

Advertisement

California

Republican governor candidate Chad Bianco says he’s the ‘antithesis to California state government’

Published

on

Republican governor candidate Chad Bianco says he’s the ‘antithesis to California state government’


We are counting down to the California governor’s race. Chad Bianco, the sheriff of Riverside County, is one of the two biggest names running on the Republican ticket.

In a one-on-one interview with Eyewitness News political reporter Josh Haskell, Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco said, “I am the antithesis to California state government because I am going to take a nuclear bomb into that building and absolutely destroy everything that they do to us behind closed doors.”

Although he’s been elected by the voters twice, Bianco says he’s not a politician — which is why he believes his campaign for California governor is resonating, as reflected in the polls.

“President Trump, in one year, from 2025 when he took over, until now, did absolutely nothing to harm California. What’s harming California is 30 years of Democrat one-party rule that have created an environment here that no one can live in anymore. They’ve only been successful here in California because we vote D no matter what. You vote D or die. I mean, that’s it. Charles Manson would be elected in California if he was the only Democrat on the ballot,” Bianco said.

Advertisement

Bianco isn’t the only conservative Republican running for governor, and according to polling, he’s neck-and-neck with former Fox News host Steve Hilton.

SEE ALSO: CA governor candidate Steve Hilton says ‘everybody supports’ Trump’s immigration policies

Leading in some polls in the wide-open California Governor’s race as the June primary creeps closer is Republican and former Fox News host Steve Hilton.

“Steve has no chance of winning in November. The Democrats know that I’m going to win in November, and so they have to do everything they can to keep me out of that,” Bianco said.

When asked about the affordability crisis in the state, Bianco said, “Almost the entire issue of affordability in California is because of regulation, excessive regulation imposed by government. Every single regulation can be signed away with the governor’s signature.”

Advertisement

“It is a drug and alcohol addiction problem that, and a mental health problem,” he said about the homelessness crisis. “Every single bit of money that is going to these nonprofits that say ‘homeless,’ zero money. You’re getting absolutely nothing. I can’t tell you that we would end what we see in the homeless situation within a year, but I guarantee you we would never see it again after two years.”

When challenged on that prediction, pointing to how the state doesn’t have the facilities to treat the number of people living on our streets, Bianco responded, “We have been conditioned to believe that buildings take five years to build. It takes 90 days or less to build a house, but in California, it takes three to five years because the government won’t allow it. The regulations that are destroying this state are going to be removed with me as the governor.”

Bianco also said California jails shouldn’t have to play the role of treatment facilities.

Although he says he supports the Trump administration and wants the president’s endorsement, Bianco has been traveling the state — meeting not just with Republicans, but Democrats and independents as well. He says all of our state government officials have failed.

The primary election is June 2.

Advertisement

No clear front-runner in race for California governor, new poll shows

A new poll shows there’s still no clear front-runner in the race to replace Gov. Gavin Newsom.

Copyright © 2026 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

PlayOn Sports fined $1.1 million by California watchdog over student data violations

Published

on

PlayOn Sports fined .1 million by California watchdog over student data violations


California’s privacy watchdog has ordered PlayOn Sports to pay a $1.10 million fine and change how it handles consumer data after finding the company’s practices violated state law in ways that affected students and schools in the state.

The California Privacy Protection Agency Board issued the decision following a settlement reached by CalPrivacy’s Enforcement Division.

The decision is the first by the board to address privacy violations involving students and California schools.

Schools across the country use PlayOn Sports’ GoFan platform to sell digital tickets to high school sporting events, theater performances, and homecoming and prom dances, with attendees presenting tickets at the door on their mobile phones.

Advertisement

Schools also use PlayOn Sports’ platforms for other sports-related activities, including attending games, streaming them online, and looking up statistics about teams and players.

In California, about 1,400 schools contract with PlayOn Sports for these services.

[RELATED] X faces possible fines as EU probes Grok nonconsensual, sexualized deepfakes

GoFan is also the official ticketing platform for the California Interscholastic Federation, the governing body for high school sports.

According to the board’s decision, PlayOn Sports used tracking technologies to collect personal information and deliver targeted advertisements to ticketholders and others using its services.

Advertisement

The company allegedly required Californians to click “agree” to tracking technologies before they could use their tickets or view PlayOn Sports websites, without providing a sufficient opt-out option.

“Students trying to go to prom or a high school football game shouldn’t have to leave their privacy rights at the door,” said Michael Macko, CalPrivacy’s head of enforcement. “You couldn’t attend these events without showing your ticket, and you couldn’t show your ticket without being tracked for advertising. California’s privacy law does not work that way. Businesses must ensure they offer lawful ways for Californians to opt-out, particularly with captive audiences.”

The decision also describes students as a uniquely vulnerable population and warns that targeted advertising systems can subject students to profiling that can follow them for years, expose them to manipulative or harmful content, and develop sensitive inferences about their lives.

Instead of providing its own opt-out method, PlayOn Sports directed students and other users to opt out through the Network Advertising Initiative and the Digital Advertising Alliance, which the decision said violated the company’s responsibility to provide its own way for consumers to opt out. The company also allegedly failed to recognize opt-out preference signals and did not provide Californians with sufficient notice of its privacy practices.

“We are committed to making it as easy as possible for all Californians — from high school students to older adults, and everyone in between — to make the choice of whether they want to be tracked or not,” said Tom Kemp, CalPrivacy’s executive director. “Californians can opt-out with covered businesses, and they can sign up for the newly launched DROP system to request that data brokers delete their personal information.”

Advertisement

Beyond the $1.10 million fine, the board’s order requires PlayOn Sports to conduct risk assessments, provide disclosures that are easy to read and understand, and implement proper opt-out methods.

The order also requires the company to comply with California’s privacy law prohibiting the selling or sharing of personal information of consumers between 13 and 16 without their affirmative opt-in consent.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California bill to bar police from taking second job with ICE advances in state Assembly

Published

on

California bill to bar police from taking second job with ICE advances in state Assembly


Wednesday, March 4, 2026 4:43AM

CA bill to keep police from moonlighting with ICE advances

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KABC) — A bill that would prevent police officers from moonlighting with federal immigration enforcement agencies, such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, is advancing through the California State Assembly.

AB 1537 passed the State Assembly’s committee on public safety on Tuesday.

The bill also requires that officers report any offers for secondary employment related to immigration enforcement to their place of work.

Those failing to comply could face decertification as a peace officer in California.

Advertisement

The bill was introduced by Assemblymember Isaac Bryan, whose district includes Mar Vista, Ladera Heights, Mid-Wilshire and parts of South Los Angeles.

Copyright © 2026 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending