Connect with us

News

Donald Trump’s camp reels after debate injects new doubt into re-election bid

Published

on

Donald Trump’s camp reels after debate injects new doubt into re-election bid

Donald Trump’s campaign is reeling after his poor performance in the debate against Kamala Harris exasperated Republican allies who thought he had been unprepared, outplayed by the vice-president, and delivered erratic messages to voters. 

The televised face-off in Philadelphia on Tuesday — watched by nearly 60mn Americans, according to preliminary Nielsen estimates — marked a new campaign inflection point that could hurt Trump, who is now battling to regain his footing with less than two months left before the November 5 US presidential election.

“I think it was a missed opportunity to knock her out . . . She was losing momentum. I think it probably stabilised her,” a top Trump donor told the Financial Times.

Although Republican strategists and lawmakers did not think Trump’s uneven performance had crippled his campaign, many conceded the former president had struggled and that his re-election bid now looked more tenuous. 

“The biggest frustration about his performance is he took the bait on nonsense stuff, which prevented him from closing the deal. So definitely a missed opportunity,” said one senior Republican strategist close to Trump.  

Advertisement

“Maybe he was overconfident. Maybe he didn’t prepare. Maybe he was just tired,” said John Catsimatidis, the billionaire New York City grocery magnate and Trump donor. 

Catsimatidis also conceded that the vice-president had performed “much better than people expected” in the debate. “She kept her mouth shut for the last three months. Everybody thought that she was not capable of debating.”

Harris put Trump on the defensive for much of the 90-minute debate on Tuesday night, starting with an unexpected handshake between the two leaders — who had never met — before she tore into him over issues from abortion to his reputation with foreign leaders.

The former president appeared rattled at several points, including when Harris questioned the size of the crowds at his campaign rallies. Trump railed about migrants in response, rehashing an internet conspiracy theory that some were stealing people’s pets to eat them.

The debate had shown “Trump at his absolute worst”, said Frank Luntz, the veteran pollster who has worked for many Republicans over the years.

Advertisement

“He was given so many opportunities . . . every time inflation could have been raised, he chose to divert to a different issue,” Luntz said “Did [Harris] rattle him? Absolutely. Should he have been rattled? No way. But it is who he is.”

Luntz said Trump had “no choice” but to seek another televised showdown offered by Harris’s campaign, although the Republican candidate has not said if he will take part. “He has to recover. He has to give people a reason not to see this as his defining moment.”

On Wednesday morning, Trump and Harris appeared together at a ceremony to commemorate the September 11 2001 attacks in New York City, and shook hands again.

But minutes earlier, Trump had called into a morning television show on Fox News, insisting he “did great” and that the debate had been “rigged” against him, accusing the debate’s moderators at ABC News of being “dishonest” and saying their broadcasting licence should be revoked. 

A CNN poll conducted by SSRS immediately after the debate found 63 per cent of 605 people who watched it thought Harris had won, compared with 37 per cent for Trump. Before the debate, a panel of voters was evenly split, 50-50, on which candidate would perform better.

Advertisement

A YouGov poll from Wednesday of more than 3,300 people found 43 per cent thought Harris had laid out a clearer plan, with 32 per cent saying Trump had, and 24 per cent were unsure.

Betting markets also moved sharply in Harris’s favour during the debate. While Harris and Trump entered Tuesday night with similar odds, traders predicting the winner of the presidential election gave the vice-president a seven-point advantage over the former leader by the end of the night.

Even some of Trump’s top allies in Congress conceded that Harris had scored some points against the former president. “Kamala Harris? She knows how to needle people,” said Byron Donalds, the Florida Republican congressman, after the debate.

“[She] answered the question of can she stand on the stage and look the part, OK. But where was the policy, where was the leadership? She dodged and deflected on her own record,” he added. 

According to the FT’s national poll tracker, Harris had a slim 2.1 percentage point lead over Trump on Tuesday before the debate, with tight races in all of the key battleground states. 

Advertisement

The senior Republican strategist said that, despite their concerns, Trump’s poor showing was “unlikely to drastically move the race”. “She was better than passable, but hardly a knockout,” the strategist said of Harris. 

It remains unclear whether Trump will agree to a second presidential debate. Jen O’Malley Dillon, Harris’s campaign manager, signalled late on Tuesday that the vice-president would be willing to participate in another face-off next month.

Yet Trump on Wednesday expressed reservations to Fox News, which has proposed three possible debate dates in October.

“I don’t know that I want to do another debate,” Trump said. “I’d be less inclined to because we had a great night.”

Advertisement

News

Video: What the Texas Primary Battle Means for the Midterms

Published

on

Video: What the Texas Primary Battle Means for the Midterms

new video loaded: What the Texas Primary Battle Means for the Midterms

The first battle of the midterm elections will be the U.S. Senate primary in Texas. Our Texas bureau chief, David Goodman, explains why Democrats and Republicans across the U.S. are watching closely to see what happens in the state.

By J. David Goodman, Alexandra Ostasiewicz, June Kim and Luke Piotrowski

March 1, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Mass shooting at Austin, Texas bar leaves at least 3 dead, 14 wounded, authorities say

Published

on

Mass shooting at Austin, Texas bar leaves at least 3 dead, 14 wounded, authorities say

Gunfire rang out at a bar in Austin, Texas, early Sunday and at least three people were killed, the city’s police chief said.

Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis told reporters the shooter was killed by officers at the scene. 

Fourteen others were hospitalized and three were in critical condition, Austin-Travis County EMS Chief Robert Luckritz said.

“We received a call at 1:39 a.m. and within 57 seconds, the first paramedics and officers were on scene actively treating the patients,” Luckritz said.

Advertisement

There was no initial word on the shooter’s identity or motive.

An Austin police officer guards the scene on West 6th Street at West Avenue after a shooting on Sunday, March 1, 2026, in Austin, Texas.

Jay Janner/Austin American-Statesman via AP


Davis noted how fortunate it was that there was a heavy police presence in Austin’s entertainment district at the time, enabling officers to respond quickly as bars were closing.

Advertisement

“Officers immediately transitioned … and were faced with the individual with a gun,” Davis said. “Three of our officers returned fire, killing the suspect.”

She called the shooting a “tragic, tragic” incident.

Texas Bar Shooting

Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis provides a briefing after a shooting on Sunday, March 1, 2026, near West Sixth Street and Nueces in downtown Austin, Texas.

Ricardo B. Brazziell/Austin American-Statesman via AP


Austin Mayor Kirk Watson said his heart goes out to the victims, and he praised the swift response of first responders.

Advertisement

“They definitely saved lives,” he said.

Davis said federal law enforcement is aiding the investigation.

Continue Reading

News

A long-buried recording and the Supreme Court of old (CT+) : Consider This from NPR

Published

on

A long-buried recording and the Supreme Court of old (CT+) : Consider This from NPR
Recently, movie critic Bob Mondello brought us a story about how he found a 63-year-old recording of his father arguing a case before the Supreme Court. The next day, he bumped into Nina Totenberg, NPR’s legal affairs correspondent, in the newsroom. They were talking so animatedly that we ushered them into a studio to continue the conversation.To unlock this and other bonus content — and listen to every episode sponsor-free — sign up for NPR+ at plus.npr.org. Regular episodes haven’t changed and remain available every weekday.Email us at considerthis@npr.org.
Continue Reading

Trending