Connect with us

New Hampshire

How New Hampshire’s candidates for governor would lead on energy, climate change • New Hampshire Bulletin

Published

on

How New Hampshire’s candidates for governor would lead on energy, climate change • New Hampshire Bulletin


This story is the second in a series examining how the top four gubernatorial candidates, as determined by polling data, would lead on energy and the environment. Read the first one here. The third installment, coming soon, will focus on the candidates’ positions on offshore wind.

New Hampshire’s natural beauty is undeniable. But its environment – and the people and the economy that depend on it – faces mounting threats due to climate change. 

You can see and feel the changes for yourself: It’s hotter than it used to be. It snows less. Water is creeping in from the coast. 

The next governor of New Hampshire will set the tone for how the state addresses climate change. So far, the state has been out of step with its New England neighbors. It lags in renewable energy adoption and is the only state in the region without a statutory requirement to lower greenhouse gas emissions.

Advertisement

Whoever replaces Gov. Chris Sununu, who is not seeking reelection after four terms in office, will also have to tackle energy affordability in a state and region with some of the highest electricity rates in the country. The next governor will also make key appointments to the Public Utilities Commission and the Department of Energy.

The four top candidates for governor expressed distinct visions in these areas in interviews with the Bulletin. Asked how they see climate change impacting the state in the coming years and decades, and what they would do to mitigate those impacts, the candidates described the problem in different terms.

NH gubernatorial candidates say no to Dalton landfill but split on other development

Kelly Ayotte, the Republican former U.S. senator and state attorney general, said she would take a “bipartisan, balanced approach to protecting our environment, but we have to do so without increasing energy costs, because people can’t afford how much energy costs right now in New Hampshire.”

She said she would focus on preserving natural spaces and was concerned by what was happening at the Connecticut Lakes Headwaters Forest in northern New Hampshire. A company that owns the land sought to reduce the tree harvest there and sell carbon credits, but the state rejected the plan

Advertisement

“Someone from out of state bought it and is trying to reduce the use of that land,” she said. “So, to me, as we think about conserving our land, it’s about conserving everything for the use of people and the enjoyment of the people of New Hampshire, and then protecting our environment.” 

Joyce Craig, the Democratic former Manchester mayor, said climate change “is coming up with residents in every conversation.” She said she would focus on lowering costs, increasing renewable energy, and protecting the environment.

“We are seeing how we’ve had a mild winter, impacting our outdoor recreation and tourism,” she said. “We’ve seen how climate change has affected our Seacoast, with Route 1 being washed out by storms this winter. And just recently, the effects of the storm, the flooding that we had this past week (in July). We need to take action on addressing climate change.”

Chuck Morse, the Republican who served for years as president of the state Senate, said he passed legislation that allows people to choose what forms of energy they want to use. He sponsored a bill in 2021 that banned municipalities from enacting mandates on how people heat their homes. 

“I’ve always been one that likes to deal with facts,” he said. “And I think, when it comes to climate change, or anything to do with energy, the people should be given the facts from the government, and they should be able to make that decision.”

Advertisement

Pressed on what effect he sees climate change having on the state, he said: “I’m a believer that we go through evolution and things are going to change, and that’s gonna happen. But I’ve worked pretty hard to make sure we protect New Hampshire, and most of my work has been in water, to be honest with you, but that’s where I’ve spent a lot of time.” 

Morse helped establish and previously led the state’s Drinking Water and Groundwater Trust Fund.

Cinde Warmington, the lone Democrat on the Executive Council, said the impacts of climate change are “visible everywhere in our state.”

She listed them: more frequent, severe floods; crop losses, especially apples last year; cyanobacteria blooms driven in part by lack of ice cover in the winter; economic impacts to the ski industry; and risks to “the health and well-being of Granite Staters and of our planet.”

She called climate change “a truly serious threat to our state” and said New Hampshire needs “a governor who will recognize that we’re in the middle of a climate crisis.”

Advertisement

“We start from the premise that climate change presents a real and imminent threat to our state,” she said, “and that we need to take really bold action to protect our future.”

Here’s more on how each candidate would lead on energy and climate.

Kelly Ayotte files as a candidate for governor at the Secretary of State’s Office in Concord on June 13, 2024. (Claire Sullivan | New Hampshire Bulletin)

Kelly Ayotte (R)

Ayotte, who Sununu endorsed this month, has a similar message on energy as the incumbent governor.

“I would take an all-of-the-above approach for New Hampshire,” she said. “And that means that we would look to make sure that whatever we do, that we aren’t adding additional costs to the people of New Hampshire that increase their energy bills.”

She said that “literally means all of the above.” (Though, she said later, not the offshore wind projects being proposed in the Gulf of Maine.) She said she is particularly interested in small modular nuclear reactors, because they’re “carbon neutral, but they also allow us to produce our own energy.’’

Advertisement

While in the U.S. Senate, Ayotte stood at odds with the vast majority of her party on climate change. She was one of only five Republican senators in 2015 to support an amendment that said humans contribute significantly to climate change. She was also the first Republican in Congress to openly back President Barack Obama’s plan to reduce carbon emissions. 

After losing reelection to the Senate, Ayotte sat on the board of Bloom Energy, a fuel cell company, from 2017 to 2019, according to HuffPost. A 2019 Axios investigation found the company had a “history of playing fast and loose with its numbers.” A 2020 Forbes report boiled down the technology’s limited reach to it being “too dirty and too costly.”

Campaign spokesman John Corbett called a recent HuffPost article detailing the issues with the company, and Ayotte’s connections to it, a “partisan hack job report.” “​​While partisan hacks write BS reports,” he said, “Kelly will continue to lay out her positive vision for our state,” pointing out her record crossing party lines in favor of environmental protection.

Ayotte said she would be “open to looking at” legislation to expand net metering but wants to “make sure that we don’t pass additional costs on to ratepayers.”

“I think responsible expansion of net metering, we would balance the benefits of clean energy that can flow to communities,” she said, “and really make sure, though, that we’re protecting ratepayers.”

Advertisement

Sununu frustrated clean energy advocates by vetoing legislation that would’ve expanded net metering to projects up to 5 megawatts. Currently, net metering is capped at 1 megawatt, except for “political subdivisions” like municipalities, for which Sununu approved a net metering expansion up to 5 megawatts in 2021. 

She said “reduced energy costs for everyone” would be the No. 1 focus of the Department of Energy, which was established in 2021, under her governorship.

Asked if it would be important to her that picks for the DOE and Public Utilities Commission, which regulates utilities in the state, have past experience in energy, she said, “I think in appointing anyone to any position in state government, I would want to look at their whole breadth of experience.”

“For me, obviously, I think experience in the field … that is very good to have,” she said. “… But I would need to look at everyone’s resume. I would have to consider their background, and also their prior experience and their performance.”

Transportation is the state’s “single largest source” of greenhouse gas emissions, according to the state’s Priority Climate Action Plan from March. Electric vehicles present an opportunity to cut that impact.

Advertisement

The nearby states of Maine, Massachusetts, and New York offer rebates for EVs. 

“I don’t think that we should offer rebates for electric vehicles,” Ayotte said, pointing to the fact that the Biden administration “has massively subsidized” EVs. “And if people want to own an electric vehicle, you know, certainly that’s their choice.”

Joyce Craig files to run for governor on June 14, 2024. (Annmarie Timmins | New Hampshire Bulletin)

Joyce Craig (D)

Craig said the state is “overly reliant on fossil fuels.” She connects addressing affordability to her push for green energy.

“We need to look at ways to decrease costs for our residents,” she said. “That includes expanding net metering, allowing families, businesses, schools, nonprofits that can’t meet their current needs on site to join shared generation projects, such as community solar farms or small hydro, to support New Hampshire’s growing community power movement, allowing customer generators to offset their remaining energy needs with community power, expand low and moderate income solar programs throughout our state, and develop offshore wind.”

She said she would sign the net metering expansion that Sununu vetoed. 

In terms of providing rebates for EVs, she said, “We would absolutely look into something like that.”

Advertisement

She said it was important to her that her appointees to the DOE and the PUC have past experience in the energy field – “and that they understand and believe climate change is real.”

“It is absolutely something that we need to make sure that these individuals have background in,” she said, “and believe in the value of energy efficiency programs, and making sure they are funded to save our residents money.”

As for the priorities for a Craig DOE, she said they would be “to lower costs for our residents, to diversify our energy, and to reduce our carbon footprint.”

Chuck Morse (seated) files to run for governor on June 5, 2024. (Annmarie Timmins | New Hampshire Bulletin)

Chuck Morse (R)

Morse thinks the key to lowering energy costs is getting more energy in the region.

“I believe the only way New Hampshire drives down electric costs is to have more energy come into the Northeast, whether that’s gas or oil, we just need to get more energy up here,” he said, “and that’s a big part of a governor solving the problem.”

He added: “Gov. Sununu has done a great job of not letting any costs hit on the energy side to the consumer, but that’s just playing defense, and that’s what we’ve been doing is playing defense.”

Advertisement

Asked if he would support legislation to expand net metering, Morse said: “I would do the same thing, though, that Gov. Sununu has paid attention to – I would do nothing that brings up the cost for someone else. And that’s why Gov. Sununu has vetoed all those projects.”

Like his Republican competitor, he said he wouldn’t support the state investing in EV rebates, pointing to other priorities. 

“I’ve always been one that has been, you know, more worried about the things that we have to do, whether it’s mental illness, disabled children, things like that,” he said. “… We’re a small state, and we have to be careful with our budgets.”

As for his DOE, he said, “it’d be a lot like Gov. Sununu.” In fact, he said, Joshua Elliott, who Sununu tapped as the department’s director of policy and programs, used to work for him in the Senate. 

On whether it was important his energy appointees have past experience in the field, he said, “I think any pick that I’m going to do in any field will have to deal with the fact that they have experience and they can move New Hampshire forward.”

Advertisement

Like Ayotte, he opposes offshore wind in the Gulf of Maine.

Cinde Warmington files for governor on June 12, 2024. Her mother, Jean McCaffrey, is at right. (Annmarie Timmins | New Hampshire Bulletin)

Cinde Warmington (D)

While Morse embraced Sununu’s energy record, Warmington cast herself in stark contrast to it.

Asked about how she would help residents struggling to pay their electric bills, she said, “this is in large part due to the … current governor’s philosophy of really being opposed – hostile – towards both energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy and of leaving us behind in terms of the electrification of our transportation sector.”

She said her plan for energy focuses on combating climate change, electrifying the transportation sector, adding jobs and growing the economy, and nurturing innovation in the state. Having a diversified energy portfolio, she said, “is what it’s going to take to ultimately lower the cost of energy in our state.”

She also slammed the governor’s “hostility toward solar energy,” saying, “we have to make sure we’ve worked through the details, but, yes, I mean, I want that piece of legislation” to expand net metering.

“That is really what our businesses and our municipalities are calling for,” she said. “And it is Sununu who is stopping that from happening in our state.”

Advertisement

As for EV rebates on the state level, she said, “we’re gonna look at all the options to increase and … truly lead in the electrification of our transportation sector” and that looking at federal funding would be “a priority.”

A Warmington DOE, she said, would focus on her plan for a clean energy economy, “all of that done with an eye to the ratepayer and making sure that the investments we’re making are going to benefit Granite Staters and Granite State businesses going forward.”

She said it would be important to her that her energy appointees have past experience in the field. She pointed to the fact that she was the lone vote against Sununu’s energy commissioner, Jared Chicoine.

That was, she said, “due in large part because of the lack of experience, but also because of his thoughts with respect to climate change, or rather that he doesn’t see government having a role in addressing climate change. I think government does have a role – an important role – in making sure that we’re addressing climate change.”

She was also the only vote against the chair of the PUC, Daniel C. Goldner. She said this was because, on climate change, he “doesn’t necessarily believe that it is a creation of man’s activities.”

Advertisement

Warmington, like Craig, supports offshore wind in the Gulf of Maine.



Source link

New Hampshire

2 transgender girls drop NH lawsuit after Supreme Court ruling, personal hardships

Published

on

2 transgender girls drop NH lawsuit after Supreme Court ruling, personal hardships


Two transgender girls who were the first to challenge President Donald Trump’s executive order, “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports,” have withdrawn their lawsuit in New Hampshire based on a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that upheld state bans on transgender athletes in girls’ sports and their own personal hardships, their lawyer said.

“This case was always about two courageous young girls who simply wanted the same opportunities as their peers to participate in school life,” their lawyer, Chris Erchull of GLAD Law, said in a statement Thursday. “Their willingness to stand up to extraordinary hostility made clear the human cost of laws that target transgender youth.”

The teenagers, Parker Tirrell and Iris Turmelle, took on Trump’s executive order last year, amending their 2024 complaint against New Hampshire’s law on banning transgender girls from school sports. A federal judge had granted a court order allowing them to play as the case proceeded.

For Tirrell, it meant being able to keep playing on her high school girls’ soccer team. For Turmelle, it was having a chance to try out for different sports.

Advertisement

Both sides agreed to pause the case and wait for a ruling from the Supreme Court as it considered similar state laws barring transgender girls and women from playing on school and college athletic teams in Idaho and West Virginia. Last month, the court upheld the laws. It also said that barring transgender girls and women doesn’t run afoul of the federal law known as Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination in education.

Several key rulings came out of the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, including a block on the president’s executive order ending birthright citizenship.

One teen and her family decided to move from New Hampshire

Turmelle and her family moved out of New Hampshire last summer following proposed legislation against transgender people. One measure signed into law by Republican Gov. Kelly Ayotte last year prohibits medical professionals from providing puberty blockers and hormone replacement therapy to new transgender patients under age 18.

“Though there may be a carve-out for people already receiving gender-affirming care, that is way too close a call for us to risk staying,” Turmelle’s mother, Amy Manzetti, wrote in an op-ed piece at the time. “Other New Hampshire laws also seek to erase her.”

Most Republican-controlled states in the past five years have adopted laws or policies limiting gender-affirming care for transgender minors and limiting which school bathrooms transgender people can use, as well as sports restrictions. The Williams Institute at UCLA estimates that about 3% of youth ages 13 to 17 identify as transgender.

Advertisement

“The challenges with relocation are significant and burdensome — this includes having to find new employment, buying and selling homes, packing and moving possessions, integrating kids with a new school system, losing access to longstanding family and friends, and potential loss of income,” Corinne Goodwin, the executive director of Eastern PA Trans Equality Project in Pennsylvania, said in an email.

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against two transgender students who sued to overturn their states’ bans against playing on girls’ and women’s teams.

“But these families do so because they love their kids and know that supporting them with the care and opportunities they need is critical to their long-term success and happiness.”

The other teen gave up playing soccer at high school

Tirrell, 17, began her junior year last fall on the girls’ junior varsity soccer team. Things were fine at first, and each time she scored a goal, she got a round of ice cream from her parents. But a few weeks into the season, she decided to stop playing.

“With all of the political stuff going on, soccer wasn’t just about the game anymore,” her mother, Sara Tirrell, told The Associated Press in an interview.

Advertisement

It became more about preparing for the possibility of conflict.

“Were there any local Facebook groups where they were sort of agitating about potential protests and how do we prepare, and what are we walking into, and we never kind of knew,” she said. “We were on a lot of pins and needles, especially after the previous season.”

She was referring to a controversy at an away game where two dads from an opposing team were banned from school grounds for wearing pink wristbands marked “XX” to represent female chromosomes. They sued the school district and a judge ruled against them. They have appealed their case.

Last fall, there was an increased presence of school administrators at the games and bus drivers pulled in closer to the field so the students weren’t in the parking lot, she said.

“Parker didn’t talk about it a lot, but I think she could see that stress for everybody — for her, for her teammates, for her coaches,” Sara Tirrell said. “She felt kind of bad about pulling them all into that circus again. And so she ultimately said, ‘This isn’t fun anymore and I don’t want to do it.’”

Advertisement

Parker’s father described the atmosphere as “palpable tension.”

Even playing on her own turf, “there would typically be a couple of police officers at the home games where there weren’t previously,” Zach Tirrell said.

In the past, Parker also played soccer in a recreation league and could still do so.

“But I think it all kind of still sort of weighs on her,” her mother said. “It’s the same group of kids that she plays with who, honestly, have been very supportive and love to have her on the team and have expressed that to her many times over. But I think she still has that worry in her brain around, ‘What are other people going to say and do if I show up at a game?’”

Parker’s parents hope she’ll return to playing soccer some day. In the meantime, “she plans to be around and use her voice to continue standing up to discrimination,” her mother said. “In some ways she’s had to grow up a lot faster than some of her peers.”

Advertisement

Associated Press reporter Geoff Mulvihill in Haddonfield, New Jersey, contributed to this article.

Two students challenging New Hampshire’s ban on transgender athletes on girls sports teams will also fight President Donald Trump’s executive order, “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports,” after a judge approved their request Wednesday.

It’s believed to be the first time that the constitutionality of the executive order signed by Trump last week is being challenged in court, according to Boston-based GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, also known as GLAD Law, one of the groups representing the teens.

“The systematic targeting of transgender people across American institutions is chilling, but targeting young people in schools, denying them support and essential opportunities during their most vulnerable years, is especially cruel,” said Chris Erchull, a GLAD attorney.

Last fall, a federal judge in New Hampshire ruled that the two students can try out for and play on girls school sports teams while the teens challenge the state ban.

Advertisement

A federal judge in New Hampshire ruled that two trans student athletes are temporarily allowed to play girls sports while their case plays out in court.

The families of Parker Tirrell, 15, and Iris Turmelle, 14, sued in August, seeking to overturn the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act that former Republican Gov. Chris Sununu signed into law in July.

Tirrell is a 10th-grade student who plays on her high school soccer team and Turmelle is a ninth-grade student who plans to try out for tennis in the spring.

“I love playing soccer and we had a great season last fall,” Tirrell said in a statement. “I just want to go to school like other kids and keep playing the game I love.”

Trump’s order last week gives federal agencies wide latitude to ensure entities that receive federal funding abide by Title IX in alignment with the Trump administration’s view, which interprets “sex” as the gender someone was assigned at birth.

Advertisement

GLAD and ACLU of New Hampshire asked the judge for permission to add Trump, the U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney General Pamela Bondi, the U.S. Department of Education and acting Secretary Denise Carter as defendants.

An email seeking comment was sent to the White House Press Office.

In a brief order, U.S. District Judge Landya McCafferty said she “finds good cause” for the lawyers to amend the lawsuit.

The lawyers say Trump’s executive order, along with parts of a Jan. 20 executive order that forbids federal money from being used to “promote gender ideology,” subjects the teens and all transgender girls to discrimination in violation of federal equal protection guarantees and their rights under Title IX.

The lawyers also say the executive orders unlawfully subject the teens’ schools to the threat of losing federal funding for allowing them to play sports.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Townsend man arrested in connection with two armed robberies in New Hampshire and New Jersey, authorities say – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Townsend man arrested in connection with two armed robberies in New Hampshire and New Jersey, authorities say – The Boston Globe


Authorities allege Joseph Sawyer brandished what appeared to be a handgun during a robbery at St. Mary’s Bank in Nashua, N.H., on June 12.Boston FBI

A Townsend man was arrested Wednesday night in connection with two armed bank robberies in New Hampshire and New Jersey last month, federal authorities said.

Joseph Sawyer, 52, was arrested by FBI Albany’s SWAT team after the bureau’s Boston office and Nashua, N.H., police learned he might be in upstate New York, FBI Boston said in a statement Thursday.

Investigators said the alleged robberies happened at St. Mary’s Bank on Northwest Boulevard in Nashua on June 12 and at a Chase Bank in Boonton, N.J., on June 27.

During both robberies, prosecutors allege Sawyer brandished what appeared to be a black semiautomatic handgun, ordered everyone inside the banks to get on the ground, and demanded their cell phones before stealing cash, according to a criminal complaint filed in New Hampshire federal court.

Advertisement

The complaint alleges Sawyer stole $6,000 from the Nashua bank before fleeing in a Honda minivan. Investigators say he discarded a shopping bag containing the bank manager’s cell phone in a nearby parking lot before driving away.

Investigators linked the two robberies through surveillance footage and license plate reader data, according to court filings. Authorities allege the minivan was driven with stolen New Jersey plates during the Boonton robbery that were later replaced with Massachusetts plates registered to Sawyer’s late father.

Sawyer was charged with one count of bank robbery in New Hampshire, court records show. It was not immediately clear Thursday night if he is being represented by an attorney.

The case is being prosecuted by the United States Attorney’s office for the District of New Hampshire, the FBI said.


Breanne Kovatch can be reached at breanne.kovatch@globe.com. Follow her @breannekovatch.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Trans athletes drop lawsuit to gain access to girls’ sports in New Hampshire after SCOTUS ruling

Published

on

Trans athletes drop lawsuit to gain access to girls’ sports in New Hampshire after SCOTUS ruling


A pair of trans athletes in New Hampshire have dismissed their lawsuit to challenge the state law that protects girls’ sports after the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Title IX ruling on June 30.

Advertisement

The trans teenage plaintiffs, Parker Tirrell and Iris Turmelle, originally filed the lawsuit in 2024 to challenge a current New Hampshire state law prohibiting trans athletes from participating in girls’ sports. The lawsuit later expanded to add President Donald Trump’s administration to the defendants after Trump signed the “No Men in Women’s Sports” executive order on Feb. 5, 2025.

The lawyers for the trans athletes claimed Trump’s executive order, along with parts of a Jan. 20 executive order that forbids federal money from being used to “promote gender ideology,” subjects the teens and all transgender girls to discrimination in violation of federal equal protection guarantees and their rights under Title IX.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

A transgender athlete and the Supreme Court (Getty Images)

The U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire then ruled last year that female athletes represented by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) attorneys were permitted to intervene in the case to defend the state’s women’s sports law and the administration’s executive orders.

Advertisement

Now, after the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling, which protects state laws that ensure only females compete in girls’ sports, there is no room for the trans teens to fight the law in New Hampshire.

“Women and girls deserve privacy, safety, and equal opportunities. That can’t happen when males are competing in women’s sports, taking spots on women’s athletic teams, and winning women’s championships,” ADF Senior Counsel and Vice President of Litigation Strategy Jonathan Scruggs said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital.

USA POWERLIFTING, ONCE IN TRANS ATHLETE LAWSUIT, SUPPORTS SCOTUS RULING: ‘LAW HAS CAUGHT UP WITH THE SCIENCE’

“President Trump’s executive orders and New Hampshire’s law recognize common sense and track Title IX, the federal law that ensures equal opportunities for women in athletics. We are grateful this case is coming to an end and that New Hampshire is free to protect its female athletes.”

Fox News Digital has reached out to Tirrell and Turmelle’s attorneys at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) for a response.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

A protester waves a transgender pride flag outside of the U.S. Supreme Court Building on June 18, 2025 in Washington, DC. Advocates organized a rally in response the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in US v. Skrmetti, in which the justices ruled to uphold state bans on gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The SCOTUS rulings in West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox, the high court upheld state laws requiring student-athletes to compete on sports teams that correspond with their biological sex at birth rather than their gender identity, in a 6-3 decision.

However, there are still 23 states, including California, New York and Massachusetts, that don’t have any such laws, and some of those have laws to protect trans athletes in girls’ sports.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending